Polyp of ColonNCT06447012
Artificial Intelligence Development for Colorectal Polyp Diagnosis
An observational study of Polyp of Colon and Colorectal Polyp, run by King's College Hospital NHS Trust at 1 site in United Kingdom.
Trial summary
Accurate classification of growths in the large bowel (polyps) identified during colonoscopy is imperative to inform the risk of colorectal cancer. Reliable identification of the cancer risk of individual polyps helps determine the best treatment option for the detected polyp and determine the appropriate interval… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Polyp of Colon, Colorectal Polyp
- What is being tested?
- Colonoscopy
- How many people
- 4,000 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited Kingdom
- Study dates
- 4 May 2024to 30 May 2026
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: All adult (over 18 years) presenting for screening or symptomatic colonoscopy
Who may be able to join
- Above 18 years at inclusion Symptomatic or screening colonoscopy
Who cannot join
- Unable to provide informed consent.
- Colitis Associated Dysplasia
- Polyps at surgical anastomosis sites
- Pregnancy
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United Kingdom1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
London, SE5 9RS
Shraddha B Gulati, MBBS PHD MRCP, +442032996044, shraddha.gulati@nhs.net
Olaolu Olabintan, MBBS MRCP, +447939056819, olaolu.olabintan@nhs.net
About this study
Official title: Development of a Novel Real Time Computer Assisted Colonoscopy Diagnostic Tool for Colorectal Polyps: Lesion Diagnosis and Personalised Patient Management
Accurate classification of growths in the large bowel (polyps) identified during colonoscopy is imperative to inform the risk of colorectal cancer. Reliable identification of the cancer risk of individual polyps helps determine the best treatment option for the detected polyp and determine the appropriate interval requirements for future colonoscopy to check the site of removal and for further polyps elsewhere in the bowel.
Current advanced endoscopic imaging techniques require specialist skills and expertise with an associated long learning curve and increased procedure time. It is for these reasons that despite being introduced in clinical practice, uptake of such techniques is limited and current methods of polyp risk stratification during colonoscopy without Artificial intelligence (AI) is suboptimal. Approximately 25% of bowel polyps that are removed by major surgery are analysed and later proved to be non-cancerous polyps that could have been removed via endoscopy thus avoiding anatomy altering surgery and the associated risks. With accurate polyp diagnosis and risk stratification in real time with AI, such polyps could have been removed non-surgically (endoscopically). Current Computer Assisted Diagnosis (CADx, a form of AI) platforms only differentiate between cancerous and non cancerous polyps which is of limited value in providing a personalised patient risk for colorectal cancer. The development of a multi-class algorithm is of greater complexity than a binary classification and requires larger training and validation datasets. A robust CADx algorithm should also involve global trainable data to minimise the introduction of bias. It is for these reasons that this is a planned international multicentre study.
Read more
The Investigators aim to develop a novel AI five class pathology prediction risk prediction tool that provides reliable information to identify cancer risk independent of the endoscopists skill.
These 5 categories are chosen because treatment options differ according to the polyp type and future check colonoscopy guidelines require these categories
Read the detailed description
The use of artificial intelligence in computer-assisted detection (CADe) to detect polyps (pre-cancerous growths) during colonoscopy is gaining increasing interest and acceptance with multiple devices already in the mainstream market. The Investigator know already from work in other countries that detecting more polyps results in a reduced risk of bowel cancer for the patient having the procedure, in the years following their colonoscopy (ie. pre-cancerous growths were detected and removed). This has formed the basis of national bowel cancer screening programmes. With increased detection of colorectal polyps, there is a growing need to correctly identify the nature of the polyp to inform the risk of colorectal cancer with the polyp detected and also the potential future risk to the patient. Accurate polyp diagnosis is also required to determine the correct mode or removal-whether this does require removal at all (leading to conservation of costs and resources in a challenging current climate), whether endoscopic removal is possible and if so by what procedure, whether surgery is required.
Published data demonstrates that approximately one quarter of surgically removed colorectal polyps with patients undergoing major surgery were benign and therefore major surgery could have been avoided with these polyps removed endoscopically reducing the risk of complication and organ preservation for the patient.
Current polyp diagnosis techniques involve the use and interpretation of specialist dyes and magnification endoscopes which come with gaining expertise expertise with an associated learning curve and increased procedure time. It is for these reasons that despite being introduced in clinical practice, uptake of such techniques is limited and current methods of polyp risk stratification during colonoscopy without AI is suboptimal.
Current polyp diagnosis AI (CADx) algorithms are limited to smaller classification Current CADx platforms differentiate between cancerous and non-cancerous polyps which is of limited value in providing a personalised patient risk for colorectal cancer. The development of a multiclass algorithm is of greater complexity than a binary classification and requires larger training and validation datasets. A robust CADx algorithm should also involve global trainable data to minimise the introduction of bias. It is for these reasons that this is a planned international multicentre study
Prospective collection of data:
This study will be conducted alongside usual patient care, but will require research staff to enter data onto a secure web-based report form (REDCAP database). This means that participants will undergo exactly the same procedure, with no differences and no extra visits or data, than would have otherwise have occurred. Participants will be those patients that have been scheduled to have a colonoscopy for the standard reasons. Patients will be invited in the usual way for colonoscopy.
They may - where possible - be sent the PIS with their appointment letter (up to 6 weeks in advance). On arrival in the endoscopy unit, they will be approached by a member of the research team and given a copy of the PIS to read - up to an hour before their procedure. They will be provided face-to-face information and explanation, prior to written consent to allow their data to be collected in the database. As the study does not require any change or additional procedures, The investigator feel that an initial approach on arrival into the endoscopy unit will provide sufficient, appropriate time to consent, even if the PIS has not been read in advance (although it will be sent if possible). The only additional consideration will be the consent to recording of the video (no patient identifiable data will be transferred as part of this aspect).
Once the colonoscopy has been completed, there will be no additional visits.
- Conditions
- Polyp of Colon, Colorectal Polyp
- Being tested
- Colonoscopy
- Keywords
- Artificial Intelligence, Computer assisted diagnosis (CADx), Colorectal cancer, Colorectal polyp, Machine learning
- Medical subject headings
- Colonic Polyps, Colorectal Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
ColonoscopyDiagnostic test
No intervention required from this study, however images will be obtained from patient presenting for colonoscopy
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
To achieve an overall accuracy of 85% for the five-classification lesion prediction algorithm.
Sensitivity and Specificity
Measured: 24 months
Positive and negative predicted value
Assess the accuracy to the trained device
Measured: 24 months
Secondary outcomes (4)
Interobserver agreement of the endoscopists' prediction of histology of polyps during the annotation process.
We will analyse the calculate the histology agreement between the advance endoscopist
Measured: 36 months
Sub-analysis of the polyp characteristics focused on different gender and ethnicity.
To assess if the prediction of patient gender, ethnicity, and age is possible with use of the developed CADx model.
Measured: 36 months
This will be a sub analysis of an AI algorithm that is trained to predict polyp histology using the prospective data cohort.
A qualitative analysis of CADx incorrect diagnoses will also be conducted by a multidisciplinary panel to evaluate potential impact
Measured: 36 months
Learned effects of AI augmented endoscopy on endoscopist optical diagnosis
We will evaluate if the use of AI during colonoscopy can be a learning tools for endoscopist
Measured: 36 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted6 Jun 2024
- Study start4 May 2024
- Primary completion1 Jun 2025 (estimated)
- Study completion30 May 2026 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Polyp of ColonStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 4,000 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- King's College Hospital NHS Trust
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06447012
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 323988
- Status last verified
- Jun 2024
- First submitted
- 7 May 2024
- Last updated
- 6 Jun 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 6 Jun 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Development of a Novel Real Time Computer Assisted Colonoscopy Diagnostic Tool for Colorectal Polyps: Lesion Diagnosis and Personalised Patient Management
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06447012
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 323988
- Conditions
- Polyp of Colon, Colorectal Polyp
- Keywords
- Artificial Intelligence, Computer assisted diagnosis (CADx), Colorectal cancer, Colorectal polyp, Machine learning
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 4,000 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- King's College Hospital NHS TrustUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 4 May 2024 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Jun 2025 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 30 May 2026 (estimated)
- First posted
- 6 Jun 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Accurate classification of growths in the large bowel (polyps) identified during colonoscopy is imperative to inform the risk of colorectal cancer. Reliable identification of the cancer risk of individual polyps helps determine the best treatment option for the detected polyp and determine the appropriate interval requirements for future colonoscopy to check the site of removal and for further polyps elsewhere in the bowel.
Current advanced endoscopic imaging techniques require specialist skills and expertise with an associated long learning curve and increased procedure time. It is for these reasons that despite being introduced in clinical practice, uptake of such techniques is limited and current methods of polyp risk stratification during colonoscopy without Artificial intelligence (AI) is suboptimal. Approximately 25% of bowel polyps that are removed by major surgery are analysed and later proved to be non-cancerous polyps that could have been removed via endoscopy thus avoiding anatomy altering surgery and the associated risks. With accurate polyp diagnosis and risk stratification in real time with AI, such polyps could have been removed non-surgically (endoscopically). Current Computer Assisted Diagnosis (CADx, a form of AI) platforms only differentiate between cancerous and non cancerous polyps which is of limited value in providing a personalised patient risk for colorectal cancer. The development of a multi-class algorithm is of greater complexity than a binary classification and requires larger training and validation datasets. A robust CADx algorithm should also involve global trainable data to minimise the introduction of bias. It is for these reasons that this is a planned international multicentre study.
The Investigators aim to develop a novel AI five class pathology prediction risk prediction tool that provides reliable information to identify cancer risk independent of the endoscopists skill.
These 5 categories are chosen because treatment options differ according to the polyp type and future check colonoscopy guidelines require these categories
Detailed description
The use of artificial intelligence in computer-assisted detection (CADe) to detect polyps (pre-cancerous growths) during colonoscopy is gaining increasing interest and acceptance with multiple devices already in the mainstream market. The Investigator know already from work in other countries that detecting more polyps results in a reduced risk of bowel cancer for the patient having the procedure, in the years following their colonoscopy (ie. pre-cancerous growths were detected and removed). This has formed the basis of national bowel cancer screening programmes. With increased detection of colorectal polyps, there is a growing need to correctly identify the nature of the polyp to inform the risk of colorectal cancer with the polyp detected and also the potential future risk to the patient. Accurate polyp diagnosis is also required to determine the correct mode or removal-whether this does require removal at all (leading to conservation of costs and resources in a challenging current climate), whether endoscopic removal is possible and if so by what procedure, whether surgery is required.
Published data demonstrates that approximately one quarter of surgically removed colorectal polyps with patients undergoing major surgery were benign and therefore major surgery could have been avoided with these polyps removed endoscopically reducing the risk of complication and organ preservation for the patient.
Current polyp diagnosis techniques involve the use and interpretation of specialist dyes and magnification endoscopes which come with gaining expertise expertise with an associated learning curve and increased procedure time. It is for these reasons that despite being introduced in clinical practice, uptake of such techniques is limited and current methods of polyp risk stratification during colonoscopy without AI is suboptimal.
Current polyp diagnosis AI (CADx) algorithms are limited to smaller classification Current CADx platforms differentiate between cancerous and non-cancerous polyps which is of limited value in providing a personalised patient risk for colorectal cancer. The development of a multiclass algorithm is of greater complexity than a binary classification and requires larger training and validation datasets. A robust CADx algorithm should also involve global trainable data to minimise the introduction of bias. It is for these reasons that this is a planned international multicentre study
Prospective collection of data:
This study will be conducted alongside usual patient care, but will require research staff to enter data onto a secure web-based report form (REDCAP database). This means that participants will undergo exactly the same procedure, with no differences and no extra visits or data, than would have otherwise have occurred. Participants will be those patients that have been scheduled to have a colonoscopy for the standard reasons. Patients will be invited in the usual way for colonoscopy.
They may - where possible - be sent the PIS with their appointment letter (up to 6 weeks in advance). On arrival in the endoscopy unit, they will be approached by a member of the research team and given a copy of the PIS to read - up to an hour before their procedure. They will be provided face-to-face information and explanation, prior to written consent to allow their data to be collected in the database. As the study does not require any change or additional procedures, The investigator feel that an initial approach on arrival into the endoscopy unit will provide sufficient, appropriate time to consent, even if the PIS has not been read in advance (although it will be sent if possible). The only additional consideration will be the consent to recording of the video (no patient identifiable data will be transferred as part of this aspect).
Once the colonoscopy has been completed, there will be no additional visits.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- All adult (over 18 years) presenting for screening or symptomatic colonoscopy
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Above 18 years at inclusion Symptomatic or screening colonoscopy
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Unable to provide informed consent.
- Colitis Associated Dysplasia
- Polyps at surgical anastomosis sites
- Pregnancy
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| ColonoscopyNo intervention required from this study, however images will be obtained from patient presenting for colonoscopy | Diagnostic test | – |
Primary outcome
To achieve an overall accuracy of 85% for the five-classification lesion prediction algorithm.
Time frame: 24 months
Sensitivity and Specificity
Positive and negative predicted value
Time frame: 24 months
Assess the accuracy to the trained device
4 secondary outcomes
Interobserver agreement of the endoscopists' prediction of histology of polyps during the annotation process.
Time frame: 36 months
Sub-analysis of the polyp characteristics focused on different gender and ethnicity.
Time frame: 36 months
This will be a sub analysis of an AI algorithm that is trained to predict polyp histology using the prospective data cohort.
Time frame: 36 months
Learned effects of AI augmented endoscopy on endoscopist optical diagnosis
Time frame: 36 months
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 6 Jun 2024.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Polyp of Colon
RecruitingObservational study
A Prospective Registry of Patients With Endoscopically Resected Malignant Colorectal Polyps (pT1 Colorectal Cancer)
Malignant Colorectal Polyp, Colorectal Cancer
Enrolling by invitation
Cold Snare Piecemeal Resection vs Cold Snare Endoscopic Mucosal Resection
Colon Polyp, Colon Adenoma
Enrolling by invitation
Six Versus Twelve Month Index Follow-up After Large Colon Polyp Resection
Colon Polyp, Adenoma
RecruitingPhase 1
Testing for Safety and Colorectal Cancer Preventive Effects of ONC201
Colorectal Adenomatous Polyp, Colorectal Carcinoma
Recruiting
Performance and Safety of MiWEndo-assisted Colonoscopy (MiWEndo II)
Colorectal Cancer, Colorectal Polyp
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Polyp of Colon and Colorectal Polyp, run by King's College Hospital NHS Trust at 1 site in United Kingdom.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Jun 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Shraddha B Gulati, MBBS PHD MRCP (+442032996044, shraddha.gulati@nhs.net), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
To achieve an overall accuracy of 85% for the five-classification lesion prediction algorithm. (time frame: 24 months). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Jun 2024.