Peri-ImplantitisNCT06430268
Efficacy of Non-surgical and Surgical Surface Decontamination Methods on Peri-implantitis-affected Implants
A study testing implant decontamination with titanium curette and implant decontamination with Air-Flow device in people with Peri-Implantitis and Dental Implant Failed, run by Andrea Ravida at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
This study will compare 2 methods to clean contaminated implant surfaces: air-polishing device versus titanium curette. Both of these methods will be used in the non-surgical and surgical setting, followed by implant removal. Then, in-vitro analysis to assess the efficacy of surface decontamination will be performed. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Peri-Implantitis, Dental Implant Failed
- What is being tested?
- implant decontamination with titanium curette and implant decontamination with Air-Flow device
- Type of treatment
- Medical device, Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 90 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 21 May 2024to 30 Jun 2027
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Adult individuals between 18 and 80 years of age who require the explantation of at least one titanium or titanium alloy implant due to severe peri-implantitis (> 50% bone loss and signs of inflammation);
- Individuals who did not undergo surgical or non-surgical peri-implant therapy in the previous 6 months.
Who cannot join
- Acute infection associated with adjacent teeth;
- Any technical complication that does not allow implant removal using a reverse torque device;
- Active infectious diseases of any kind;
- Medical conditions which requires premedication prior to dental treatments/visits;
- Pregnant women or planning to become pregnant (self-reported);
- History of radiotherapy in the head and neck or chemotherapy in the last 3 years;
- Any other diseases or medications that may contraindicate the surgical procedure or compromise wound healing.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
United States1 site
University of Pittsburgh, School of Dental Medicine
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15213
About this study
Official title: Efficacy of Non-surgical and Surgical Surface Decontamination Methods on Peri-implantitis-affected Implants: A Randomized Clinical Trial
This study will compare 2 methods to clean contaminated implant surfaces: air-polishing device versus titanium curette. Both of these methods will be used in the non-surgical and surgical setting, followed by implant removal. Then, in-vitro analysis to assess the efficacy of surface decontamination will be performed.
Read the detailed description
A screening visit will be performed to determine the elegibility of the individuals to participate in the study. Information related to the target implant (e.g., brand, material, surface, dimensions, time of function, history of treatment of peri-implantitis) and reconstruction (e.g., cemented or screwed prosthesis, single, multi-unit or full-arch) will be collected. Intra-oral radiographs will be obtained or exported from patients' dental records, and the marginal bone level (MBL) will be measured at the mesial and distal aspects of the implants by one calibrated investigator using an image analysis software (Image J; National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA). The anatomy of the bone defect will be determined.
Randomization will be performed in a stratified manner, in sets of 10 implants, by a computer software, to obtain equally balanced groups based on implant characteristics (site, brand, design). A researcher not involved in the clinical interventions will be responsible for randomization.
At the day of implant removal, a single calibrated examiner will assess the following parameters at six sites around each experimental implant using an UNC 15 periodontal probe: (1) Plaque accumulation, using the modified plaque index [mPI]; (2) Probing depth (mm); (3) Bleeding on probing, using the modified gingival index [mGI] ; (4) Suppuration; (5) Recession (mm). The width of keratinized mucosa (KM) will be obtained in the mid-buccal and mid-lingal aspect of the implants (mm). A standard tessellation language (STL) file of the arch of interest using an intraoral optical scanner (Trios 3, 3Shape, Denmark) will be obtained.
Surface decontamination protocols:
All cleaning procedures will be performed without the suprastructures. A notch will be performed on the buccal side of all implant shoulders with the aid of a bur, in order to distinguish the different implant surfaces during the microbiological and biocompatibility analysis phases.
Following local anesthesia, implants will be randomly assigned to the following study groups:
- Non-surgical decontamination with titanium curettes prior to implant removal (n = 20);
- Non-surgical decontamination with erythritol powder prior to implant removal (n = 20);
- Surgical decontamination with titanium curettes prior to implant removal (n = 20);
- Surgical decontamination with erythritol powder prior to implant removal (n = 20);
- No decontamination prior to implant removal (n=10).
In the surgical groups, intra-sulcular and, if necessary, vertical releasing incisions will be performed. Full-thickness flaps will be elevated in the buccal and lingual aspects and the granulation tissue will be removed.
All giant (visible) calculus will be removed with an ultrasonic tip in advance, without touching the implant surface directly. Copious irrigation with saline will be performed in both groups prior to implant decontamination. All implants will be cleaned by the same operator with the aid of dental surgical loupes. The time needed for the operator to consider the implant surface clean will be recorded.
- Titanium curettes (Hu-Friedy, Chicago, Illinois, USA) will be used for supra and submucosal around the implants.
- Air-polishing (Airflow Prophylaxis Master, EMS, Nyon, Switzerland) will be carried out with AIR-FLOW powder PLUS (EMS) containing erythritol (sugar alcohol, 14 μm), amorphous silica and 0.3% chlorhexidine. The device will be adjusted to a power setting of 5 bar static pressure and a maximum level of irrigation with water.
- Non-surgical group: The supramucosal implant surfaces will be cleaned with the Airflow handpiece, while for the submucosal areas, a Perioflow handpiece and nozzle for submucosal instrumentation will be used. The nozzle will be changed after cleaning each implant.
- Surgical group: The Airflow handpiece will be moved in a horizontal direction along implant threads from an apical to a coronal position. The angulation of the handpiece and working distance will not be standardized as they may vary according to the area being cleaned.
Implant removal:
Once the decontamination procedure has been completed, all the implants will be explanted with the aid of a reverse torque device (Implant Removal Kit; Zimmer Biomet); no trephines will be used. During the procedure, care will be taken to avoid damage to the implant and its surface. The retrieved implants will be immersed in a transport medium (Dulbecco's Modified Eagle Medium) and stored in sterile plastic vials at 4°C until further analysis.
In all study groups, the explanted sites will be again curetted and the soft tissues will be sutured with interrupted or crossed sutures. Subjects will receive detailed verbal and written postoperative instructions, as well as a prescription for anti-inflammatory medication (ibuprofen [600mg], for 3-5 days, as needed for pain control). Patients will be instructed to rinse gently with 0.12% chlorhexidine twice daily for 1 week. Sutures will be removed after 2 weeks.
Subsequently, a second randomization will take place to direct each implant (n = 10 in each decontamination group) for microbiological/elementary composition analysis and biocompatibility analysis. In-vitro analysis post surface decontamination includes assessing the cleaning efficacy, microbiological analysis, biocompatibility analysis including cultivation of cells, RNA extraction, Reverse Transcription (RT) and Real-Time RT-Polymerase Chain Reaction (Real-Time RT-PCR) , and elementary composition analysis including implant surface degradation, corrosion performance and atomic composition.
- Conditions
- Peri-Implantitis, Dental Implant Failed
- Being tested
- implant decontamination with titanium curette, implant decontamination with Air-Flow device
- Keywords
- Peri-implantitis, Decontamination, Implant Surface
- Medical subject headings
- Peri-Implantitis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
implant decontamination with titanium curetteProcedure or surgery
Titanium curettes (Hu-Friedy, Chicago, Illinois, USA) will be used for supra and submucosal around the implant, with and without flap elevation.
implant decontamination with Air-Flow deviceDevice
Air-polishing (Airflow Prophylaxis Master, EMS, Nyon, Switzerland) will be carried out with AIR-FLOW powder PLUS (EMS) containing erythritol (sugar alcohol, 14 μm), amorphous silica and 0.3% chlorhexidine to decontaminate implants with and without flap elevation. The device will be adjusted to a power setting of 5 bar static pressure and a maximum level of irrigation with water.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Non-surgical decontamination with titanium curettes followed by explantation | Experimental | Titanium curettes (Hu-Friedy, Chicago, Illinois, USA) will be used for supra and submucosal around the implants without any flap elevation. Receives: Procedure: implant decontamination with titanium curette |
| Non-surgical decontamination with erythritol powder prior to implant removal | Experimental | Without any flap elevation, the supramucosal implant surfaces will be cleaned with the Airflow handpiece, while for the submucosal areas, a Perioflow handpiece and nozzle for submucosal instrumentation will be used. The nozzle will be changed after cleaning each implant. Receives: Device: implant decontamination with Air-Flow device |
| Surgical decontamination with titanium curettes prior to implant removal | Experimental | Intra-sulcular and, if necessary, vertical releasing incisions will be performed. Full-thickness flaps will be elevated in the buccal and lingual aspects and the granulation tissue will be removed. Titanium curettes (Hu-Friedy, Chicago, Illinois, USA) will be used for supra and submucosal around the implants Receives: Procedure: implant decontamination with titanium curette |
| Surgical decontamination with erythritol powder prior to implant removal | Experimental | Intra-sulcular and, if necessary, vertical releasing incisions will be performed. Full-thickness flaps will be elevated in the buccal and lingual aspects and the granulation tissue will be removed.The Airflow handpiece will be moved in a horizontal direction along implant threads from an apical to a coronal position. The angulation of the handpiece and working distance will not be standardized as they may vary according to the area being cleaned. Receives: Device: implant decontamination with Air-Flow device |
| No decontamination prior to implant removal | No intervention | No decontamination will be performed on implants in this group. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Percentage of clean implant surface area following implant decontamination approaches
The cleaned surface area will be planimetrically recorded, and the percentage presence/absence of mineralized deposits as well as scratches on the decontaminated implant surfaces will be determined with the aid of a stereomicroscope.
Measured: Right after decontamination and implant removal (T0)
Secondary outcomes (8)
Bacterial composition of the implants
Shotgun metagenomic sequencing will be used to identify the bacterial composition in the residual biofilms.
Measured: Right after decontamination and implant removal (T0)
Biocompatibility analysis of the implant
Cultivation of osteoblastic cells will be performed and assessed on the implants.
Measured: Right after decontamination and implant removal (T0)
Scanning electron microscopy analysis of the cells and residual bacterial deposits
SEM images of the surfaces of negative control implants (brand new) and treated implants for each decontamination method will be exemplarily taken after instrumentation and cell culture.
Measured: Right after decontamination and implant removal (T0)
Patient satisfaction with the decontamination devices
Patients will be asked to fill out a questionnaire.
Measured: Right after decontamination and implant removal (T0)
Incidence of complications
Incidence of complications will be recorded by the clinician performing the intervention.
Measured: Right after decontamination and implant removal (T0)
Implant surface degradation
Three-dimensional images and roughness line profiles will be acquired by laser scanning confocal microscopy.
Measured: Right after decontamination and implant removal (T0)
Corrosion performance
In vitro electrochemical tests will be conducted to determine the corrosion performance.
Measured: Right after decontamination and implant removal (T0)
Atomic composition of the implants after removal
The atomic composition of the surface of the decontaminated implants will be examined using energy-dispersive x-ray spectroscopy (EDS).
Measured: Right after decontamination and implant removal (T0)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted28 May 2024
- Study start21 May 2024
- Primary completion30 Jun 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion30 Jun 2027 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Peri-ImplantitisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 90 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Andrea Ravida
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Association for Dental Infection Control
- Responsible party
- Sponsor-investigator, Andrea Ravida, University of Pittsburgh
- Investigators
- Andrea Ravida, DDS MS PhD, Principal investigator, University of Pittsburgh
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06430268
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- STUDY23100029
- Status last verified
- May 2026
- First submitted
- 21 May 2024
- Last updated
- 18 May 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 18 May 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Efficacy of Non-surgical and Surgical Surface Decontamination Methods on Peri-implantitis-affected Implants: A Randomized Clinical Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06430268
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- STUDY23100029
- Conditions
- Peri-Implantitis, Dental Implant Failed
- Keywords
- Peri-implantitis, Decontamination, Implant Surface
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Enrolling by invitation
- Enrolment
- 90 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Andrea RavidaUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Association for Dental Infection Control
- Study start
- 21 May 2024 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Jun 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 30 Jun 2027 (estimated)
- First posted
- 28 May 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study will compare 2 methods to clean contaminated implant surfaces: air-polishing device versus titanium curette. Both of these methods will be used in the non-surgical and surgical setting, followed by implant removal. Then, in-vitro analysis to assess the efficacy of surface decontamination will be performed.
Detailed description
A screening visit will be performed to determine the elegibility of the individuals to participate in the study. Information related to the target implant (e.g., brand, material, surface, dimensions, time of function, history of treatment of peri-implantitis) and reconstruction (e.g., cemented or screwed prosthesis, single, multi-unit or full-arch) will be collected. Intra-oral radiographs will be obtained or exported from patients' dental records, and the marginal bone level (MBL) will be measured at the mesial and distal aspects of the implants by one calibrated investigator using an image analysis software (Image J; National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA). The anatomy of the bone defect will be determined.
Randomization will be performed in a stratified manner, in sets of 10 implants, by a computer software, to obtain equally balanced groups based on implant characteristics (site, brand, design). A researcher not involved in the clinical interventions will be responsible for randomization.
At the day of implant removal, a single calibrated examiner will assess the following parameters at six sites around each experimental implant using an UNC 15 periodontal probe: (1) Plaque accumulation, using the modified plaque index [mPI]; (2) Probing depth (mm); (3) Bleeding on probing, using the modified gingival index [mGI] ; (4) Suppuration; (5) Recession (mm). The width of keratinized mucosa (KM) will be obtained in the mid-buccal and mid-lingal aspect of the implants (mm). A standard tessellation language (STL) file of the arch of interest using an intraoral optical scanner (Trios 3, 3Shape, Denmark) will be obtained.
Surface decontamination protocols:
All cleaning procedures will be performed without the suprastructures. A notch will be performed on the buccal side of all implant shoulders with the aid of a bur, in order to distinguish the different implant surfaces during the microbiological and biocompatibility analysis phases.
Following local anesthesia, implants will be randomly assigned to the following study groups:
- Non-surgical decontamination with titanium curettes prior to implant removal (n = 20);
- Non-surgical decontamination with erythritol powder prior to implant removal (n = 20);
- Surgical decontamination with titanium curettes prior to implant removal (n = 20);
- Surgical decontamination with erythritol powder prior to implant removal (n = 20);
- No decontamination prior to implant removal (n=10).
In the surgical groups, intra-sulcular and, if necessary, vertical releasing incisions will be performed. Full-thickness flaps will be elevated in the buccal and lingual aspects and the granulation tissue will be removed.
All giant (visible) calculus will be removed with an ultrasonic tip in advance, without touching the implant surface directly. Copious irrigation with saline will be performed in both groups prior to implant decontamination. All implants will be cleaned by the same operator with the aid of dental surgical loupes. The time needed for the operator to consider the implant surface clean will be recorded.
- Titanium curettes (Hu-Friedy, Chicago, Illinois, USA) will be used for supra and submucosal around the implants.
- Air-polishing (Airflow Prophylaxis Master, EMS, Nyon, Switzerland) will be carried out with AIR-FLOW powder PLUS (EMS) containing erythritol (sugar alcohol, 14 μm), amorphous silica and 0.3% chlorhexidine. The device will be adjusted to a power setting of 5 bar static pressure and a maximum level of irrigation with water.
- Non-surgical group: The supramucosal implant surfaces will be cleaned with the Airflow handpiece, while for the submucosal areas, a Perioflow handpiece and nozzle for submucosal instrumentation will be used. The nozzle will be changed after cleaning each implant.
- Surgical group: The Airflow handpiece will be moved in a horizontal direction along implant threads from an apical to a coronal position. The angulation of the handpiece and working distance will not be standardized as they may vary according to the area being cleaned.
Implant removal:
Once the decontamination procedure has been completed, all the implants will be explanted with the aid of a reverse torque device (Implant Removal Kit; Zimmer Biomet); no trephines will be used. During the procedure, care will be taken to avoid damage to the implant and its surface. The retrieved implants will be immersed in a transport medium (Dulbecco's Modified Eagle Medium) and stored in sterile plastic vials at 4°C until further analysis.
In all study groups, the explanted sites will be again curetted and the soft tissues will be sutured with interrupted or crossed sutures. Subjects will receive detailed verbal and written postoperative instructions, as well as a prescription for anti-inflammatory medication (ibuprofen [600mg], for 3-5 days, as needed for pain control). Patients will be instructed to rinse gently with 0.12% chlorhexidine twice daily for 1 week. Sutures will be removed after 2 weeks.
Subsequently, a second randomization will take place to direct each implant (n = 10 in each decontamination group) for microbiological/elementary composition analysis and biocompatibility analysis. In-vitro analysis post surface decontamination includes assessing the cleaning efficacy, microbiological analysis, biocompatibility analysis including cultivation of cells, RNA extraction, Reverse Transcription (RT) and Real-Time RT-Polymerase Chain Reaction (Real-Time RT-PCR) , and elementary composition analysis including implant surface degradation, corrosion performance and atomic composition.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 5
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Non-surgical decontamination with titanium curettes followed by explantation | Experimental | Procedure: implant decontamination with titanium curetteTitanium curettes (Hu-Friedy, Chicago, Illinois, USA) will be used for supra and submucosal around the implants without any flap elevation. |
| Non-surgical decontamination with erythritol powder prior to implant removal | Experimental | Device: implant decontamination with Air-Flow deviceWithout any flap elevation, the supramucosal implant surfaces will be cleaned with the Airflow handpiece, while for the submucosal areas, a Perioflow handpiece and nozzle for submucosal instrumentation will be used. The nozzle will be changed after cleaning each implant. |
| Surgical decontamination with titanium curettes prior to implant removal | Experimental | Procedure: implant decontamination with titanium curetteIntra-sulcular and, if necessary, vertical releasing incisions will be performed. Full-thickness flaps will be elevated in the buccal and lingual aspects and the granulation tissue will be removed. Titanium curettes (Hu-Friedy, Chicago, Illinois, USA) will be used for supra and submucosal around the implants |
| Surgical decontamination with erythritol powder prior to implant removal | Experimental | Device: implant decontamination with Air-Flow deviceIntra-sulcular and, if necessary, vertical releasing incisions will be performed. Full-thickness flaps will be elevated in the buccal and lingual aspects and the granulation tissue will be removed.The Airflow handpiece will be moved in a horizontal direction along implant threads from an apical to a coronal position. The angulation of the handpiece and working distance will not be standardized as they may vary according to the area being cleaned. |
| No decontamination prior to implant removal | No intervention | –No decontamination will be performed on implants in this group. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 80 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Adult individuals between 18 and 80 years of age who require the explantation of at least one titanium or titanium alloy implant due to severe peri-implantitis (> 50% bone loss and signs of inflammation);
- Individuals who did not undergo surgical or non-surgical peri-implant therapy in the previous 6 months.
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Acute infection associated with adjacent teeth;
- Any technical complication that does not allow implant removal using a reverse torque device;
- Active infectious diseases of any kind;
- Medical conditions which requires premedication prior to dental treatments/visits;
- Pregnant women or planning to become pregnant (self-reported);
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| implant decontamination with titanium curetteTitanium curettes (Hu-Friedy, Chicago, Illinois, USA) will be used for supra and submucosal around the implant, with and without flap elevation. | Procedure or surgery | Non-surgical decontamination with titanium curettes followed by explantation, Surgical decontamination with titanium curettes prior to implant removal |
| implant decontamination with Air-Flow deviceAir-polishing (Airflow Prophylaxis Master, EMS, Nyon, Switzerland) will be carried out with AIR-FLOW powder PLUS (EMS) containing erythritol (sugar alcohol, 14 μm), amorphous silica and 0.3% chlorhexidine to decontaminate implants with and without flap elevation. The device will be adjusted to a power setting of 5 bar static pressure and a maximum level of irrigation with water. | Device | Non-surgical decontamination with erythritol powder prior to implant removal, Surgical decontamination with erythritol powder prior to implant removal |
Primary outcome
Percentage of clean implant surface area following implant decontamination approaches
Time frame: Right after decontamination and implant removal (T0)
The cleaned surface area will be planimetrically recorded, and the percentage presence/absence of mineralized deposits as well as scratches on the decontaminated implant surfaces will be determined with the aid of a stereomicroscope.
8 secondary outcomes
Bacterial composition of the implants
Time frame: Right after decontamination and implant removal (T0)
Biocompatibility analysis of the implant
Time frame: Right after decontamination and implant removal (T0)
Scanning electron microscopy analysis of the cells and residual bacterial deposits
Time frame: Right after decontamination and implant removal (T0)
Patient satisfaction with the decontamination devices
Time frame: Right after decontamination and implant removal (T0)
Incidence of complications
Time frame: Right after decontamination and implant removal (T0)
Implant surface degradation
Time frame: Right after decontamination and implant removal (T0)
Corrosion performance
Time frame: Right after decontamination and implant removal (T0)
Atomic composition of the implants after removal
Time frame: Right after decontamination and implant removal (T0)
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 18 May 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Peri-Implantitis
Not yet recruiting
Effect of Customized Versus Stock Healing Abutments on Peri-Implant Soft Tissue
Peri-Implantitis
RecruitingObservational study
Evaluation of 25(OH)D3 and LL-37 Levels in Periimplant Sulcus Fluid
Peri Implantitis, Peri Implant Mucositis
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Diagnostic Accuracy of Large Language Models for Peri-Implant Marginal Bone Loss on Panoramic Radiographs
Peri-implantitis, Alveolar Bone Loss
RecruitingObservational study
Access to Probing and Peri-implant Diseases
Peri-implantitis, Peri-implant Bone Loss
Not yet recruitingObservational study
ATR-FTIR and Raman Spectroscopy of Peri-Implant Crevicular Fluid in Peri-Implantitis
Peri-Implantitis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Andrea Ravida, DDS MS PhD principal investigator
University of Pittsburgh
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing implant decontamination with titanium curette and implant decontamination with Air-Flow device in people with Peri-Implantitis and Dental Implant Failed, run by Andrea Ravida at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: enrolling by invitation, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 May 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Percentage of clean implant surface area following implant decontamination approaches (time frame: Right after decontamination and implant removal (T0)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 May 2026.