AzTrials
AzTrials

Aortic Valve StenosisNCT06420830

Valve Performance of the SAPIEN 3 Ultra RESILIA Valve: A Prospective Registry With Central Echocardiography Analysis.

An observational study of Aortic Valve Stenosis and Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement, run by Institut universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de Québec, University Laval at 1 site in Canada.

Recruiting

Looking for participants now. Contact the study team or a site below to ask about taking part.

Sites and contacts
Official record

Search all trials

Trial summary

The issue of valve durability has become one of the most important aspects in the TAVR field in recent years since transcatheter aortic valve replacement has been progressively applied to younger patients with a low co-morbidity burden. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 80 years
What is being tested?
SAPIEN 3 Ultra RESILIA Valve
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
How many people
150 participants
Where
1 siteCanada
Study dates
16 May 2024to 1 Sep 2034
Phase
Observational

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 80 years
  • All sexes
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Population Patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) with the SAPIEN 3 Ultra RESILIA valve.

Who may be able to join

  • Inclusion criteria - Patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing transarterial TAVR with the SAPIEN 3 Ultra RESILIA valve.
  • Successful valve implantation of the SAPIEN 3 Ultra RESILIA valve.
  • VARC-3- defined technical success defined as:
  • Freedom from mortality
  • Successful access, delivery of the device, and retrieval of the delivery system
  • Correct positioning of a single prosthetic heart valve into the proper anatomical location
  • Freedom from surgery or intervention related to the device (excluding permanent pacemaker) or to a major vascular or access related, or cardiac structural complication - Absence of severe procedural or in-hospital complications (VARC-3 definitions): mortality, stroke, bleeding type 2-4, myocardial infarction, need for a second valve, valve embolization, coronary obstruction, annular rupture.

Who cannot join

  • Age >80 years
  • Severe pulmonary disease (FEV1 <50% predicted or need for home oxygen)
  • Severe renal dysfunction (eGFR <30 ml/min/1.73m2)
  • Frailty (Clinical Frailty Scale > 4)
  • Severe coronary disease (SYNTAX score >32)
  • Left ventricular ejection fraction ≤30%
Show all 11Show fewer
  • Moderate-to-severe mitral regurgitation
  • Severe tricuspid regurgitation
  • Pulmonary systolic pressure >60 mmHg
  • STS-PROM >5%
  • Any disease leading to a life expectancy <5 years

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Canada1 site, 1 recruiting
  • IUCPQ

    Québec, Quebec, G1V 4G5

    Josep Rodes-Cabau, MD, 418-656-8711, josep.rodes@criucpq.ulaval.ca

    Emilie Pelletier Beaumont, MSc, 418-656-8711, emilie.pelletier-beaumont@criucpq.ulaval.ca

    Recruiting

Other trials in Canada

About this study

Official title: Title Valve Performance of the SAPIEN 3 Ultra RESILIA Valve: A Prospective Registry With Central Echocardiography Analysis.

The issue of valve durability has become one of the most important aspects in the TAVR field in recent years since transcatheter aortic valve replacement has been progressively applied to younger patients with a low co-morbidity burden. The SAPIEN 3 Ultra RESILIA valve represents the last generation of the SAPIEN valve system and includes several important iterations (newer leaflet calcium-blocking technology targeting calcium-attracting free aldehydes, dry tissue storage, newer skirt textile design) that should translate into a favorable impact on valve durability at mid- to long- term follow-up

Read the detailed description

Prospective observational registry including patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing TAVR with the SAPIEN 3 Ultra RESILIA valve. All patients who will survive the procedure will undergo a clinical and echocardiographic follow-up at 1-3 months (± 15 days), at 1-year (±30 days), 3-5 year (±30 days), 6-8 year (±30 days) and 9-10 year (±30 days) after valve implantation. Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) exams (baseline, 1-3-month, 1 year, 3-5 years, 6-8 years, and 9-10 years post-procedure) will be evaluated in a Centralized Echocardiographic Core Lab at the Quebec Heart and Lung Institute. The measurements obtained in the Core Lab regarding transvalvular gradient, EOA, PPM and PVL at 1-3 months will determine the primary outcome of the study.

Being tested
SAPIEN 3 Ultra RESILIA Valve
Medical subject headings
Aortic Valve Stenosis

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • SAPIEN 3 Ultra RESILIA ValveProcedure or surgery

    Patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing transarterial TAVR with the SAPIEN 3 Ultra RESILIA valve.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Transvalvular gradient

    Residual (peak and mean) transvalvular gradient

    Measured: 1-3 months

  2. Effective orifice area (EOA)

    EOA evaluated by echocardiography imaging

    Measured: 1-3 months

  3. Prosthesis-patient mismatch

    Moderate or severe prothesis-patient mismatch (defines as an index aortic valve area 0.85-0.66 cm2/m2 (moderate), ≤0.65 cm2/m2 (severe) for patient with BMI ˂30km/m2 and 0.70-0.56 cm2/m2 (moderate), ≤0.55 cm2/m2 (severe) for patient with BMI ≥30km/m2 and/or moderate-severe aortic regurgitation (AR) (VARC-3 definition).

    Measured: 1-3 months

  4. Paravalvular leaks

    Paravalvular leaks evaluated by echocardiography imaging

    Measured: 1-3 months

Secondary outcomes (10)
  1. Transvalvular gradient

    Residual (maximal and mean) transvalvular gradient

    Measured: 1-, 3-5-, 6-8-, and 9-10-year follow-up.

  2. Effective orifice area (EOA)

    EOA evaluated by echocardiography imaging

    Measured: 1-, 3-5-, 6-8-, and 9-10-year follow-up.

  3. Bioprosthetic valve dysfunction

    Bioprosthetic valve dysfunction evaluated by VARC3 criteria

    Measured: 1-, 3-5-, 6-8-, and 9-10-year follow-up.

  4. Paravalvular leaks

    Paravalvular leaks evaluated by echocardiography imaging

    Measured: 1-, 3-5-, 6-8-, and 9-10-year follow-up.

  5. Bioprosthetic valve dysfunction

    Incidence rate (per 100 patient-years) of bioprosthetic valve dysfunction (stage 2 or 3)

    Measured: yearly

  6. Bioprosthetic valve failure

    Incidence rate (per 100 patient-years) of bioprosthetic valve failure

    Measured: yearly

  7. Bioprosthetic valve failure

    Bioprosthetic valve failure evaluated by VARC3 criteria

    Measured: 1-, 3-5-, 6-8-, and 9-10-year follow-up.

  8. Clinical events

    Individual: mortality, stroke, bleeding type 2-4, cardiac rehospitalization, heart failure rehospitalization

    Measured: 1month and yearly up to 10-year

  9. Valve thrombosis

    Number of patients with valve thrombosis

    Measured: 1-3 months and yearly up to 10-year

  10. Valve endocarditis

    Number of patients with valve endocarditis

    Measured: 1-3 months and yearly up to 10-year

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted20 May 2024
  2. Study start16 May 2024
  3. Primary completion1 Oct 2026 (estimated)
  4. Study completion1 Sep 2034 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
150 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06420830
Sponsor's protocol ID
RESILIA
Status last verified
Mar 2026
First submitted
15 May 2024
Last updated
27 Mar 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Publications

  • Writing Committee Members; Otto CM, Nishimura RA, Bonow RO, Carabello BA, Erwin JP 3rd, Gentile F, Jneid H, Krieger EV, Mack M, McLeod C, O'Gara PT, Rigolin VH, Sundt TM 3rd, Thompson A, Toly C; ACC/AHA Joint Committee Members; O'Gara PT, Beckman JA, Levine GN, Al-Khatib SM, Armbruster A, Birtcher KK, Ciggaroa J, Deswal A, Dixon DL, Fleisher LA, de las Fuentes L, Gentile F, Goldberger ZD, Gorenek B, Haynes N, Hernandez AF, Hlatky MA, Joglar JA, Jones WS, Marine JE, Mark D, Palaniappan L, Piano MR, Spatz ES, Tamis-Holland J, Wijeysundera DN, Woo YJ. 2020 ACC/AHA guideline for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2021 Aug;162(2):e183-e353. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2021.04.002. Epub 2021 May 8. No abstract available.

    PubMed 33972115
  • Vahanian A, Beyersdorf F, Praz F, Milojevic M, Baldus S, Bauersachs J, Capodanno D, Conradi L, De Bonis M, De Paulis R, Delgado V, Freemantle N, Gilard M, Haugaa KH, Jeppsson A, Juni P, Pierard L, Prendergast BD, Sadaba JR, Tribouilloy C, Wojakowski W; ESC/EACTS Scientific Document Group. 2021 ESC/EACTS Guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease. Eur Heart J. 2022 Feb 12;43(7):561-632. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab395. No abstract available.

    PubMed 34453165
  • Mack MJ, Leon MB, Thourani VH, Makkar R, Kodali SK, Russo M, Kapadia SR, Malaisrie SC, Cohen DJ, Pibarot P, Leipsic J, Hahn RT, Blanke P, Williams MR, McCabe JM, Brown DL, Babaliaros V, Goldman S, Szeto WY, Genereux P, Pershad A, Pocock SJ, Alu MC, Webb JG, Smith CR; PARTNER 3 Investigators. Transcatheter Aortic-Valve Replacement with a Balloon-Expandable Valve in Low-Risk Patients. N Engl J Med. 2019 May 2;380(18):1695-1705. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1814052. Epub 2019 Mar 16.

    PubMed 30883058
  • Popma JJ, Deeb GM, Yakubov SJ, Mumtaz M, Gada H, O'Hair D, Bajwa T, Heiser JC, Merhi W, Kleiman NS, Askew J, Sorajja P, Rovin J, Chetcuti SJ, Adams DH, Teirstein PS, Zorn GL 3rd, Forrest JK, Tchetche D, Resar J, Walton A, Piazza N, Ramlawi B, Robinson N, Petrossian G, Gleason TG, Oh JK, Boulware MJ, Qiao H, Mugglin AS, Reardon MJ; Evolut Low Risk Trial Investigators. Transcatheter Aortic-Valve Replacement with a Self-Expanding Valve in Low-Risk Patients. N Engl J Med. 2019 May 2;380(18):1706-1715. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1816885. Epub 2019 Mar 16.

    PubMed 30883053
  • Montarello NJ, Willemen Y, Tirado-Conte G, Travieso A, Bieliauskas G, Sondergaard L, De Backer O. Transcatheter aortic valve durability: a contemporary clinical review. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023 May 9;10:1195397. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1195397. eCollection 2023.

    PubMed 37229228
  • Ferreira-Neto AN, Rodriguez-Gabella T, Guimaraes L, Freitas-Ferraz A, Bernier M, Figueiredo Guimaraes C, Pasian S, Paradis JM, Delarochelliere R, Dumont E, Mohammadi S, Kalavrouziotis D, Cote M, Pibarot P, Rodes-Cabau J. Multimodality evaluation of transcatheter structural valve degeneration at long-term follow-up. Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed). 2021 Mar;74(3):247-256. doi: 10.1016/j.rec.2020.02.002. Epub 2020 Apr 8. English, Spanish.

    PubMed 32278660
  • Leon MB, Smith CR, Mack M, Miller DC, Moses JW, Svensson LG, Tuzcu EM, Webb JG, Fontana GP, Makkar RR, Brown DL, Block PC, Guyton RA, Pichard AD, Bavaria JE, Herrmann HC, Douglas PS, Petersen JL, Akin JJ, Anderson WN, Wang D, Pocock S; PARTNER Trial Investigators. Transcatheter aortic-valve implantation for aortic stenosis in patients who cannot undergo surgery. N Engl J Med. 2010 Oct 21;363(17):1597-607. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1008232. Epub 2010 Sep 22.

    PubMed 20961243

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in