AzTrials
AzTrials

HypospadiasNCT06405763

Snodgrass Versus Grafted Snodgrass Repair in Narrow Urethral Plate in Distal Penile Hypospadias

A study testing Snodgrass repair and Snodgrass repair with graft in people with Hypospadias, run by Sohag University at 1 site in Egypt.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

We aime to compare between Snodgrass and grafted Snodgrass repair in the outcome in distal penile hypospadias with urethral plate less than 8mm Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 6 months to 16 years, men onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Hypospadias
What is being tested?
Snodgrass repair and Snodgrass repair with graft
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
50 participants
Where
1 siteEgypt
Study dates
11 Dec 2023to 10 Dec 2024
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 6 months to 16 years
  • Men only
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Child

Who may be able to join

  • Children age: > 6m up to 16y
  • Distal penile hypospadias(distal shaft,coronal,subcoronal )
  • mid penile hypospadias with mild chordae les 30 degree
  • Urethral plate <8 mm in maximum transverse diameter before the midline urethral plate incision .Primary non-circumcised cases of hypospadias

Who cannot join

  • Proximal and mid penile hypospadias with marked chordae
  • previous hypospadias repair

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Ahmed S Gebaly Adam, Resident contact

+2001126314479

ahmedshawky@med.sohag.edu.eg

Tarek A Siefin, Lecturer contact

+200109 880 4947

Egypt1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Sohag University Hospitals

    Sohag, 82511

    Ahmed S Gebaly Adam, +2001002372157, ahmedshawky@med.sohag.edu.eg

    Recruiting

Other trials in Egypt

About this study

We aime to compare between Snodgrass and grafted Snodgrass repair in the outcome in distal penile hypospadias with urethral plate less than 8mm

Read the detailed description

The main goal for hypospadias repair is to achieve both cosmetic and functional normality.

Several surgical techniques for hypospadias repair have been developed that depend on the site of the urethral meatus in children The effect of the urethral plate characteristics on the surgical outcome of Snodgrass repair has been studied in many series. Some documented that urethral plate width has a significant impact on the complication rates Holland and Smith reported a high complication rate in Snodgrass repair with a urethral plate width of less than 8 mm 7 The augmentation of the urethral plate either with inlay graft (DIGU, Snodgraft, or G-TIP), Onlay preputial flap, or other flaps carries a better outcome than the original TIP in many studies Others denied any effect of the narrow urethral plate on the success rate We aim in this study to determine which is better in narrow urethral plate in distal penile hypospadias, as regarding surgical and cosmetic outcomes; Snodgrass or combined inner preputial graft with Snodgrass

Conditions
Hypospadias
Being tested
Snodgrass repair, Snodgrass repair with graft
Medical subject headings
Hypospadias

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Snodgrass repairProcedure or surgery

    A relaxing incision is made in the midline by using scalpel or scissors

    A 6 F stent is passed into the bladder. The neourethra is closed

  • Snodgrass repair with graftProcedure or surgery

    A relaxing incision is made in the midline by using scalpel or scissors In grafted Snodgrass repairA free graft was measured and harvested from the inner prepuce and was defatted and sutured onto the incised urethral plate The graft was sutured overlying the incision line A 6 F stent is passed into the bladder. The neourethra is closed

Study groups in NCT06405763
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Snodgrass repair groupActive comparatorA relaxing incision is made in the midline by using scalpel or scissors from Within the meatus to the end of the plate. A 6 F stent is passed into the bladder. The neourethra is closed using a fine suture, 7-0 or 6-0 vicryl sutures in two-layer.
Receives: Procedure: Snodgrass repair
Snodgrass repair with graft groupActive comparatorA relaxing incision is made in the midline by using scalpel or scissors A free graft was measured and harvested from the inner prepuce and was defatted and sutured onto the incised urethral plate after the urethral plate was incised he graft was sutured overlying the incision line A 6 F stent is passed into the bladder. The neourethra is closed
Receives: Procedure: Snodgrass repair with graft

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Functional outcome

    Investigators want to compare between Snodgrass and combined inner preputial graft with Snodgrass in functional outcome by evaluation of the stream an ideal stream of urine (single, compact, rifled, non-dispersed urinary stream of adequate caliber) without straining.

    Measured: 12 months

  2. Cosmetic outcome

    Investigators want to compare between Snodgrass and combined inner preputial graft with Snodgrass in cosmetic outcome By Hypospadias Objective penile Evaluation (HOPE) Score 1.meatus position 2.meatus shape 3.glans shape 4.penile skin shape 5.penile axis secreal 6.Torsion

    Measured: 12 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted8 May 2024
  2. Study start11 Dec 2023
  3. Primary completion10 Dec 2024 (estimated)
  4. Study completion10 Dec 2024 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
50 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06405763
Sponsor's protocol ID
Soh-Med-23-12-06MS
Status last verified
May 2024
First submitted
28 Apr 2024
Last updated
8 May 2024
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Publications

  • Stock JA, Scherz HC, Kaplan GW. Distal hypospadias. Urol Clin North Am. 1995 Feb;22(1):131-8.

    PubMed 7855949
  • Elmoghazy H, Hussein MM, Mohamed E, Badawy A, Alsagheer G, Abd Elhamed AM. A novel technique for repair of mid-penile hypospadias using a preputial skin flap: results of 110 patients. Int Urol Nephrol. 2016 Dec;48(12):1943-1949. doi: 10.1007/s11255-016-1416-7. Epub 2016 Sep 13.

    PubMed 27623810
  • Nerli RB, Chandra S, Rai S, Dixit NS. Grafted tubularised incised plate: A right option in the management of failed mid-penile and distal hypospadias. Afr J Paediatr Surg. 2023 Jul-Sep;20(3):197-201. doi: 10.4103/ajps.ajps_19_22.

    PubMed 37470555
  • Holland AJ, Smith GH, Ross FI, Cass DT. HOSE: an objective scoring system for evaluating the results of hypospadias surgery. BJU Int. 2001 Aug;88(3):255-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1464-410x.2001.02280.x.

    PubMed 11488741

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Snodgrass repair and Snodgrass repair with graft in people with Hypospadias, run by Sohag University at 1 site in Egypt.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 May 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Egypt. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Ahmed S Gebaly Adam, Resident (+2001126314479, ahmedshawky@med.sohag.edu.eg), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Functional outcome (time frame: 12 months). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06405763, which also lists 4 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 May 2024.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in