Esophageal CancerERSS-EGCNCT06306755
Effectiveness of Risk-based Sequential Screening for Esophageal and Gastric Cancer
A study testing Risk Assessment and Individualized Surveillance and Universal screening in people with Esophageal Cancer and Gastric Cancer, run by Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute at 1 site in China.
Trial summary
To evaluate the feasibility, applicability, effectiveness, and health-economic value of the risk-based sequential screening modality for esophageal and gastric cancers, the investigators aim to initiate a community-based randomized controlled trial in Xun County, Henan Province, which is a high-risk region of upper… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 50 to 69 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Esophageal Cancer, Gastric Cancer, Precision Screening
- What is being tested?
- Risk Assessment and Individualized Surveillance and Universal screening
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 21,000 participants
- Where
- 1 siteChina
- Study dates
- 25 Jun 2024to Dec 2034
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 50 to 69 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Permanent residency in the target villages in Xun County, Henan Province, China;
- Aged 50 to 69 at the enrollment;
- Voluntarily participate in this study and provide informed consent.
Who cannot join
- Had a history of endoscopic examination within 5 years prior to the initial interview;
- Had a history of cancer;
- Had a history of mental disorder;
- Positive for hepatitis B virus (HBV), hepatitis C virus (HCV), and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV);
- Had severe cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases;
- Had severe respiratory disease, dyspnea, or asthmaticus status;
Show all 14Show fewer
- Had retropharyngeal abscess, severe spinal deformity, or aortic aneurysm;
- With physical debility unable to tolerate endoscopic examination, or with difficulty in achieving sedation and self-control;
- In the acute phase of corrosive inflammation of the upper gastrointestinal tract, or with suspected perforation of the upper gastrointestinal tract;
- Had massive ascites, severe abdominal distension, or severe esophageal varices;
- Pregnancy;
- Had severe history of allergies;
- Had propensity for bleeding (coagulopathy);
- Others unable to tolerate the clinical examinations involved in this study.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
China1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Department of genetics, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 100142
Zhonghu He, zhonghuhe@bjcancer.org
Zhonghu He, PhD
About this study
Official title: Effectiveness of Risk-based Sequential Screening for Esophageal and Gastric Cancer: A Community-Based Randomized Controlled Trial
To evaluate the feasibility, applicability, effectiveness, and health-economic value of the risk-based sequential screening modality for esophageal and gastric cancers, the investigators aim to initiate a community-based randomized controlled trial in Xun County, Henan Province, which is a high-risk region of upper gastrointestinal cancer (UGIC) in northern China.
A total of 258 target villages from all the 11 communities (townships and streets) in Xun County will be randomly selected and assigned to the sequential screening group and the universal screening group at a ratio of 2:1 and the total sample size will be 21,000.
Read more
In the sequential screening group, participants in the top 50% risk level (i.e., stratified as the high-risk subgroup) will be offered a standard upper gastrointestinal endoscopic screening. In contrast, all participants in the universal screening group will receive the endoscopic examination. The surveillance strategy for participants with screening-detected premalignant lesions in the sequential screening group will be tailored based on individualized risk assessment using endoscopic characteristics, pathological diagnosis, and biomarkers. Surveillance for participants in the universal screening group will adhere to current guidelines for UGIC screening and clinical treatment.
Detection rates of upper gastrointestinal malignant lesions, early-stage malignant lesions and premalignant lesions, and health-economic indicators such as the unit cost per detected malignant lesions will be compared between the two groups.
Read the detailed description
A series of challenges have arisen for the current UGIC screening modality in China, including high screening costs, low detection rates, delayed and unstandardized treatment, and lack of sustainability and scalability. These challenges significantly hinder the normalization and high-quality implementation of UGIC prevention and control efforts. The precision shift in the screening modality is expected to result in substantial savings in medical resources while maximizing the identification and management of high-risk populations.
The investigators aim to initiate a community-based randomized controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness of risk-stratification-based sequential screening for esophageal and gastric cancer (ERSS-EGC trial) in Xun County of Henan Province, which is a high-risk region of UGIC in northern China.
According to the baseline data obtained from our prior UGIC screening program conducted in the same region, the detection rate of upper gastrointestinal malignant lesions in the targeted population (aged 50-69 years) in the universal screening group is estimated to be 1.1%. It is assumed that the implementation of sequential screening will increase this detection rate by 70%, indicating an expected detection rate of 1.9% for upper gastrointestinal malignant lesions in the sequential screening group. Ultimately, a total of 7,674 endoscopies (with 3,837 in each group) will be required to achieve a statistical power of 80% at a one-sided significance level of 2.5%.
Based on the estimated population coverage determined by sample size, a total of 258 target villages from all the 11 communities (townships and streets) in Xun County will be randomly selected, stratified by townships and streets. These 258 target villages will be randomly assigned to either the sequential screening group or the universal screening group at a ratio of 2:1, based on the population size of each village and stratified by region (urban and rural areas). This results in 172 villages in the sequential screening group and 86 villages in the universal screening group. Approximately 21,000 permanent residents aged 50 to 69 residing in the target villages will be enrolled in the trial.
All enrolled eligible participants will receive an epidemiological questionnaire investigation (collecting data on basic information, dietary habits, environmental exposure, family history, symptoms, quality of life, etc.). Additionally, participants will receive a physical examination, which includes measurement of height, weight, blood pressure, as well as the collection of biological samples. These samples comprise: (1) peripheral venous blood samples for serological screening of infectious diseases, complete blood count, and biospecimen banking (including serum, plasma, white blood cells, and cell-free DNA); (2) tongue coating swab. Furthermore, standardized digital tongue images will be captured from all study participants.
In the sequential screening group, all enrolled participants will be offered a risk assessment for esophageal and gastric malignancies based on two questionnaire-based diagnostic models. Participants identified as "high-risk" (i.e., with a top 50% risk level) for esophageal and/or gastric malignancy will receive the standard upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Standardized diagnosis and treatment recommendations will be provided to patients with screening-detected malignant lesions, and green referral channels will be established for them. For participants with screening-detected premalignant lesions, the risk of progression will be evaluated based on endoscopic characteristics, pathological diagnosis, and biomarkers. Individualized reexamination and surveillance will be implemented accordingly.
In the universal screening group, all enrolled participants will receive the same standard upper gastrointestinal endoscopy as those in the sequential screening group, irrespective of the results of the risk assessment. Standardized diagnosis and treatment recommendations will be provided to patients with screening-detected malignant lesions, and green referral channels will be established for them. For participants with screening-detected premalignant lesions, the reexamination and surveillance will be performed according to the current guidelines for UGIC screening and clinical treatment.
Prior to the endoscopic examination, exfoliated cells from the esophagus and esophagogastric junction will be collected using a sponge device and stored in preservation solution for subsequent scientific research. For individuals who exhibited abnormalities during endoscopic examination and are biopsied for pathologic diagnosis, a paired tissue biopsy sample at the same location will be collected and preserved in RNA protection solution for further scientific research.
The primary outcome of this study is the detection rate of upper gastrointestinal (esophageal/gastric) malignant lesions. The secondary outcomes include the rate of early-stage upper gastrointestinal (esophageal/gastric) malignant lesions, detection rate of upper gastrointestinal (esophageal/gastric) premalignant lesions, response rate of endoscopic examination, total screening costs, unit cost per detected upper gastrointestinal malignant lesions, unit cost per detected early-stage upper gastrointestinal malignant lesions, unit cost per detected upper gastrointestinal premalignant lesions, satisfaction of project executors and participants, rate of timely treatment, UGIC-specific mortality, all-cause mortality, and quality of life.
Through a comprehensive comparison with the universal screening, this trial will provide high-level evidence regarding the feasibility, applicability, effectiveness, and health-economic value of the sequential screening modality. Furthermore, it could effectively facilitate standardized diagnosis and treatment for screening-detected patients, providing crucial practical experience and scientific evidence for the reform and development of secondary prevention strategies for UGIC in China.
- Conditions
- Esophageal Cancer, Gastric Cancer, Precision Screening, Sequential Screening, Risk Stratification
- Being tested
- Risk Assessment and Individualized Surveillance, Universal screening
- Medical subject headings
- Esophageal Neoplasms, Stomach Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Risk Assessment and Individualized SurveillanceProcedure or surgery
- An epidemiological questionnaire-based risk assessment for UGIC conducted prior to the endoscopic examination;
- Individuals identified as "high-risk" receive the upper gastrointestinal endoscopic examination with Lugol's Iodine in the esophagus and indigo carmine staining in the stomach;
- Individualized reexamination and surveillance strategy will be given to participants diagnosed with premalignant lesions, based on evaluation of risk progression using endoscopic characteristics, pathological diagnosis, and biomarkers.
Universal screeningProcedure or surgery
- A questionnaire investigation;
- All participants undergo the upper gastrointestinal endoscopic examination with Lugol's Iodine in the esophagus and indigo carmine staining in the stomach;
- Reexamination and surveillance will be performed according to the current guidelines for UGIC screening and clinical treatment.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Sequential screening group | Experimental | The enrolled participants will undergo a questionnaire investigation and receive a risk assessment for esophageal and gastric malignancies based on two questionnaire-based diagnostic models. Participants identified as "high-risk" (i.e., with a top 50% risk level) for esophageal and/or gastric malignancy will receive the standard upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Standardized diagnosis and treatment recommendations will be provided to patients with screening-detected malignant lesions, and green referral channels will be established for them. For participants with screening-detected premalignant lesions, the risk of progression will be evaluated based on endoscopic characteristics, pathological diagnosis, and biomarkers. Individualized reexamination and surveillance will be implemented accordingly. Receives: Procedure: Risk Assessment and Individualized Surveillance |
| Universal screening group | Active comparator | The enrolled participants will undergo a questionnaire investigation and receive the same standard upper gastrointestinal endoscopy as those in the sequential screening group, irrespective of the results of the risk assessment. Standardized diagnosis and treatment recommendations will be provided to patients with screening-detected malignant lesions, and green referral channels will be established for them. For participants with screening-detected premalignant lesions, the reexamination and surveillance will be performed according to the current guidelines for UGIC screening and clinical treatment. Receives: Procedure: Universal screening |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Detection rate of upper gastrointestinal (esophageal/gastric) malignant lesions
Number of detected malignant lesions / Number of completed endoscopies × 100%
Measured: 12 months
Secondary outcomes (12)
Rate of early-stage upper gastrointestinal (esophageal/gastric) malignant lesions
Measured: 12 months
Detection rate of upper gastrointestinal (esophageal/gastric) premalignant lesions
Measured: 12 months
Response rate of endoscopic examination
Measured: 12 months
Total screening costs
Measured: 12 months
Unit cost per detected upper gastrointestinal (esophageal/gastric) malignant lesions
Measured: 12 months
Unit cost per detected early-stage upper gastrointestinal (esophageal/gastric) malignant lesions
Measured: 12 months
Unit cost per detected upper gastrointestinal (esophageal/gastric) premalignant lesions
Measured: 12 months
Satisfaction with the risk-based sequential screening modality
Satisfaction with the risk-based sequential screening modality is measured through a one-on-one interview using a semi-structured questionnaire specially designed for this trial.
Measured: 12 months
Rate of timely treatment
Measured: 12 months
UGIC-specific mortality
Measured: 5-10 years
All-cause mortality
Measured: 5-10 years
Quality of life Scale Score
European Quality of Life 5-Dimension (EQ-5D) index score is used to assess health-related quality of life.
Measured: 12 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted12 Mar 2024
- Study start25 Jun 2024
- Primary completionDec 2028 (estimated)
- Study completionDec 2034 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (3)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Esophageal CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Peking University Cancer Hospital & InstituteThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Screening
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 21,000 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06306755
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2021YFC2500405
- Acronym
- ERSS-EGC
- Status last verified
- Jan 2025
- First submitted
- 3 Mar 2024
- Last updated
- 24 Jan 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Zheng H, Liu Z, Chen Y, Ji P, Fang Z, He Y, Guo C, Xiao P, Wang C, Yin W, Li F, Chen X, Liu M, Pan Y, Liu F, Liu Y, He Z, Ke Y. Development and external validation of a quantitative diagnostic model for malignant gastric lesions in clinical opportunistic screening: A multicenter real-world study. Chin Med J (Engl). 2024 Oct 5;137(19):2343-2350. doi: 10.1097/CM9.0000000000002903. Epub 2024 Feb 26.
PubMed 38403900Liu Z, Zheng H, Liu M, He Y, Chen Y, Ji P, Fang Z, Xiao P, Li F, Guo C, Yin W, Pan Y, He Z, Ke Y. Development and External Validation of an Improved Version of the Diagnostic Model for Opportunistic Screening of Malignant Esophageal Lesions. Cancers (Basel). 2022 Nov 30;14(23):5945. doi: 10.3390/cancers14235945.
PubMed 36497427He Z, Liu Z, Liu M, Guo C, Xu R, Li F, Liu A, Yang H, Shen L, Wu Q, Duan L, Li X, Zhang C, Pan Y, Cai H, Ke Y. Efficacy of endoscopic screening for esophageal cancer in China (ESECC): design and preliminary results of a population-based randomised controlled trial. Gut. 2019 Feb;68(2):198-206. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2017-315520. Epub 2018 Jan 6.
PubMed 29306867
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 24 Jan 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Effectiveness of Risk-based Sequential Screening for Esophageal and Gastric Cancer: A Community-Based Randomized Controlled Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06306755
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ERSS-EGC / 2021YFC2500405
- Conditions
- Esophageal Cancer, Gastric Cancer, Precision Screening, Sequential Screening, Risk Stratification
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 21,000 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Peking University Cancer Hospital & InstituteUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 25 Jun 2024 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Dec 2028 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Dec 2034 (estimated)
- First posted
- 12 Mar 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
To evaluate the feasibility, applicability, effectiveness, and health-economic value of the risk-based sequential screening modality for esophageal and gastric cancers, the investigators aim to initiate a community-based randomized controlled trial in Xun County, Henan Province, which is a high-risk region of upper gastrointestinal cancer (UGIC) in northern China.
A total of 258 target villages from all the 11 communities (townships and streets) in Xun County will be randomly selected and assigned to the sequential screening group and the universal screening group at a ratio of 2:1 and the total sample size will be 21,000.
In the sequential screening group, participants in the top 50% risk level (i.e., stratified as the high-risk subgroup) will be offered a standard upper gastrointestinal endoscopic screening. In contrast, all participants in the universal screening group will receive the endoscopic examination. The surveillance strategy for participants with screening-detected premalignant lesions in the sequential screening group will be tailored based on individualized risk assessment using endoscopic characteristics, pathological diagnosis, and biomarkers. Surveillance for participants in the universal screening group will adhere to current guidelines for UGIC screening and clinical treatment.
Detection rates of upper gastrointestinal malignant lesions, early-stage malignant lesions and premalignant lesions, and health-economic indicators such as the unit cost per detected malignant lesions will be compared between the two groups.
Detailed description
A series of challenges have arisen for the current UGIC screening modality in China, including high screening costs, low detection rates, delayed and unstandardized treatment, and lack of sustainability and scalability. These challenges significantly hinder the normalization and high-quality implementation of UGIC prevention and control efforts. The precision shift in the screening modality is expected to result in substantial savings in medical resources while maximizing the identification and management of high-risk populations.
The investigators aim to initiate a community-based randomized controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness of risk-stratification-based sequential screening for esophageal and gastric cancer (ERSS-EGC trial) in Xun County of Henan Province, which is a high-risk region of UGIC in northern China.
According to the baseline data obtained from our prior UGIC screening program conducted in the same region, the detection rate of upper gastrointestinal malignant lesions in the targeted population (aged 50-69 years) in the universal screening group is estimated to be 1.1%. It is assumed that the implementation of sequential screening will increase this detection rate by 70%, indicating an expected detection rate of 1.9% for upper gastrointestinal malignant lesions in the sequential screening group. Ultimately, a total of 7,674 endoscopies (with 3,837 in each group) will be required to achieve a statistical power of 80% at a one-sided significance level of 2.5%.
Based on the estimated population coverage determined by sample size, a total of 258 target villages from all the 11 communities (townships and streets) in Xun County will be randomly selected, stratified by townships and streets. These 258 target villages will be randomly assigned to either the sequential screening group or the universal screening group at a ratio of 2:1, based on the population size of each village and stratified by region (urban and rural areas). This results in 172 villages in the sequential screening group and 86 villages in the universal screening group. Approximately 21,000 permanent residents aged 50 to 69 residing in the target villages will be enrolled in the trial.
All enrolled eligible participants will receive an epidemiological questionnaire investigation (collecting data on basic information, dietary habits, environmental exposure, family history, symptoms, quality of life, etc.). Additionally, participants will receive a physical examination, which includes measurement of height, weight, blood pressure, as well as the collection of biological samples. These samples comprise: (1) peripheral venous blood samples for serological screening of infectious diseases, complete blood count, and biospecimen banking (including serum, plasma, white blood cells, and cell-free DNA); (2) tongue coating swab. Furthermore, standardized digital tongue images will be captured from all study participants.
In the sequential screening group, all enrolled participants will be offered a risk assessment for esophageal and gastric malignancies based on two questionnaire-based diagnostic models. Participants identified as "high-risk" (i.e., with a top 50% risk level) for esophageal and/or gastric malignancy will receive the standard upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Standardized diagnosis and treatment recommendations will be provided to patients with screening-detected malignant lesions, and green referral channels will be established for them. For participants with screening-detected premalignant lesions, the risk of progression will be evaluated based on endoscopic characteristics, pathological diagnosis, and biomarkers. Individualized reexamination and surveillance will be implemented accordingly.
In the universal screening group, all enrolled participants will receive the same standard upper gastrointestinal endoscopy as those in the sequential screening group, irrespective of the results of the risk assessment. Standardized diagnosis and treatment recommendations will be provided to patients with screening-detected malignant lesions, and green referral channels will be established for them. For participants with screening-detected premalignant lesions, the reexamination and surveillance will be performed according to the current guidelines for UGIC screening and clinical treatment.
Prior to the endoscopic examination, exfoliated cells from the esophagus and esophagogastric junction will be collected using a sponge device and stored in preservation solution for subsequent scientific research. For individuals who exhibited abnormalities during endoscopic examination and are biopsied for pathologic diagnosis, a paired tissue biopsy sample at the same location will be collected and preserved in RNA protection solution for further scientific research.
The primary outcome of this study is the detection rate of upper gastrointestinal (esophageal/gastric) malignant lesions. The secondary outcomes include the rate of early-stage upper gastrointestinal (esophageal/gastric) malignant lesions, detection rate of upper gastrointestinal (esophageal/gastric) premalignant lesions, response rate of endoscopic examination, total screening costs, unit cost per detected upper gastrointestinal malignant lesions, unit cost per detected early-stage upper gastrointestinal malignant lesions, unit cost per detected upper gastrointestinal premalignant lesions, satisfaction of project executors and participants, rate of timely treatment, UGIC-specific mortality, all-cause mortality, and quality of life.
Through a comprehensive comparison with the universal screening, this trial will provide high-level evidence regarding the feasibility, applicability, effectiveness, and health-economic value of the sequential screening modality. Furthermore, it could effectively facilitate standardized diagnosis and treatment for screening-detected patients, providing crucial practical experience and scientific evidence for the reform and development of secondary prevention strategies for UGIC in China.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Screening
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Sequential screening group | Experimental | Procedure: Risk Assessment and Individualized SurveillanceThe enrolled participants will undergo a questionnaire investigation and receive a risk assessment for esophageal and gastric malignancies based on two questionnaire-based diagnostic models. Participants identified as "high-risk" (i.e., with a top 50% risk level) for esophageal and/or gastric malignancy will receive the standard upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Standardized diagnosis and treatment recommendations will be provided to patients with screening-detected malignant lesions, and green referral channels will be established for them. For participants with screening-detected premalignant lesions, the risk of progression will be evaluated based on endoscopic characteristics, pathological diagnosis, and biomarkers. Individualized reexamination and surveillance will be implemented accordingly. |
| Universal screening group | Active comparator | Procedure: Universal screeningThe enrolled participants will undergo a questionnaire investigation and receive the same standard upper gastrointestinal endoscopy as those in the sequential screening group, irrespective of the results of the risk assessment. Standardized diagnosis and treatment recommendations will be provided to patients with screening-detected malignant lesions, and green referral channels will be established for them. For participants with screening-detected premalignant lesions, the reexamination and surveillance will be performed according to the current guidelines for UGIC screening and clinical treatment. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 50 to 69 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Permanent residency in the target villages in Xun County, Henan Province, China;
- Aged 50 to 69 at the enrollment;
- Voluntarily participate in this study and provide informed consent.
Key exclusion criteria (14 listed)
- Had a history of endoscopic examination within 5 years prior to the initial interview;
- Had a history of cancer;
- Had a history of mental disorder;
- Positive for hepatitis B virus (HBV), hepatitis C virus (HCV), and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV);
- Had severe cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases;
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Risk Assessment and Individualized Surveillance1. An epidemiological questionnaire-based risk assessment for UGIC conducted prior to the endoscopic examination; 2. Individuals identified as "high-risk" receive the upper gastrointestinal endoscopic examination with Lugol's Iodine in the esophagus and indigo carmine staining in the stomach; 3. Individualized reexamination and surveillance strategy will be given to participants diagnosed with premalignant lesions, based on evaluation of risk progression using endoscopic characteristics, pathological diagnosis, and biomarkers. | Procedure or surgery | Sequential screening group |
| Universal screening1. A questionnaire investigation; 2. All participants undergo the upper gastrointestinal endoscopic examination with Lugol's Iodine in the esophagus and indigo carmine staining in the stomach; 3. Reexamination and surveillance will be performed according to the current guidelines for UGIC screening and clinical treatment. | Procedure or surgery | Universal screening group |
Primary outcome
Detection rate of upper gastrointestinal (esophageal/gastric) malignant lesions
Time frame: 12 months
Number of detected malignant lesions / Number of completed endoscopies × 100%
12 secondary outcomes
Rate of early-stage upper gastrointestinal (esophageal/gastric) malignant lesions
Time frame: 12 months
Detection rate of upper gastrointestinal (esophageal/gastric) premalignant lesions
Time frame: 12 months
Response rate of endoscopic examination
Time frame: 12 months
Total screening costs
Time frame: 12 months
Unit cost per detected upper gastrointestinal (esophageal/gastric) malignant lesions
Time frame: 12 months
Unit cost per detected early-stage upper gastrointestinal (esophageal/gastric) malignant lesions
Time frame: 12 months
Unit cost per detected upper gastrointestinal (esophageal/gastric) premalignant lesions
Time frame: 12 months
Satisfaction with the risk-based sequential screening modality
Time frame: 12 months
Rate of timely treatment
Time frame: 12 months
UGIC-specific mortality
Time frame: 5-10 years
All-cause mortality
Time frame: 5-10 years
Quality of life Scale Score
Time frame: 12 months
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 24 Jan 2025.
- Background: PubMed 38403900Zheng H, Liu Z, Chen Y, Ji P, Fang Z, He Y, Guo C, Xiao P, Wang C, Yin W, Li F, Chen X, Liu M, Pan Y, Liu F, Liu Y, He Z, Ke Y. Development and external validation of a quantitative diagnostic model for malignant gastric lesions in clinical opportunistic screening: A multicenter real-world study. Chin Med J (Engl). 2024 Oct 5;137(19):2343-2350. doi: 10.1097/CM9.0000000000002903. Epub 2024 Feb 26.
- Background: PubMed 36497427Liu Z, Zheng H, Liu M, He Y, Chen Y, Ji P, Fang Z, Xiao P, Li F, Guo C, Yin W, Pan Y, He Z, Ke Y. Development and External Validation of an Improved Version of the Diagnostic Model for Opportunistic Screening of Malignant Esophageal Lesions. Cancers (Basel). 2022 Nov 30;14(23):5945. doi: 10.3390/cancers14235945.
- Background: PubMed 29306867He Z, Liu Z, Liu M, Guo C, Xu R, Li F, Liu A, Yang H, Shen L, Wu Q, Duan L, Li X, Zhang C, Pan Y, Cai H, Ke Y. Efficacy of endoscopic screening for esophageal cancer in China (ESECC): design and preliminary results of a population-based randomised controlled trial. Gut. 2019 Feb;68(2):198-206. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2017-315520. Epub 2018 Jan 6.
Related trials for Esophageal Cancer
RecruitingPhase 2/3
Multicenter Validation Trial of [18F]AlF-FAPI-74 for PET Imaging of Cancer-associated Fibroblasts Through Fibroblast Activation Protein Inhibitors (FAPI) in Different Tumor Types
Oesophageal Cancer, Gastric Cancer
RecruitingObservational study
Multicenter Prospective Cohort on Esophageal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection
Superficial Esophageal Cancer, Oesophageal Adenocarcinoma
Recruiting
The Vanguard Study: Testing a New Way to Screen for Cancer
Bladder Carcinoma, Breast Carcinoma
RecruitingPhase 2
At-Home Cancer Directed Therapy Versus in Clinic for the Treatment of Patients With Advanced Cancer
Advanced Anal Carcinoma, Advanced Biliary Tract Carcinoma
RecruitingPhase 1
A Study to Learn About the Study Medicine Called PF-08046876 in People With Advanced Solid Tumors
Advanced/Metastatic Solid Tumors, Bladder Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Risk Assessment and Individualized Surveillance and Universal screening in people with Esophageal Cancer and Gastric Cancer, run by Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute at 1 site in China.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 14 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Jan 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Zhonghu He (010-88196702, zhonghuhe@bjcancer.org), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Detection rate of upper gastrointestinal (esophageal/gastric) malignant lesions (time frame: 12 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06306755, which also lists 3 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Jan 2025.