Acute Malnutrition in ChildhoodNCT06287827
Treatment of Acute Malnutrition in Outpatient Care Services in Venezuela: a Prospective Cohort Research
An observational study of Acute Malnutrition in Childhood and Wasting, run by UNICEF - Venezuela at 4 sites in Venezuela.
Trial summary
The goal of this observational study is to compare the effectiveness, safety, and efficiency of the simplified protocol, which includes the following three modifications: a) use of a single treatment product (RUTF), b) reduced dose, c) expanded cut-offs, with the standard protocol based on the 2023 World Health… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 6 to 59 months
- Conditions the study is for
- Acute Malnutrition in Childhood, Wasting, Child Malnutrition
- What is being tested?
- Simplified protocol and Standard protocol
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- How many people
- 299 participants
- Where
- 4 sitesVenezuela
- Study dates
- 14 Feb 2024to 31 Aug 2024
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 6 to 59 months
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child
Study population: The research population consisted of children with uncomplicated moderate or severe acute malnutrition who are admitted to the nutritional care program in care centers and associated institutions in Bolívar, Capital District, La Guaira, and Miranda. Given the observational nature of the research, the sample size of the population will not be calculated. Rather, a research group or intentional sample will be analyzed, made up of all children who attend the care centers and meet the inclusion criteria of the research during a collection period of two months in each cohort.
Who may be able to join
- Simplified protocol cohort
- MUAC <125 mm or
- Weight-Height/length Z Score <-2 or
- Mild bipedal pitting oedema.
- And all the following:
- No medical complications
Show all 25Show fewer
- Positive appetite test.
- Standard protocol cohort
- SAM:
- MUAC <115 mm or
- Weight-Height/length Z Score <-3 or
- Mild bipedal pitting oedema
- And all the following:
- No medical complications
- Positive appetite test
- MAM (Although MAM cases are not traditionally included, in this study they will be incorporated if they meet the following criteria):
- MUAC ≥ 115 mm to < 125 mm or
- Weight-Height/length Z Score ≥ -3 to < -2 and
- No nutritional oedema
- And at least one the following:
- Failing to recover from moderate wasting after receiving other interventions (counselling alone).
- Having relapsed to moderate wasting
- History of severe wasting
- Households' low socioeconomic status (Determined by Graffar-Mendez-Castellanos method)
- Co-morbidity (HIV, tuberculosis, or a physical or mental disability that does not jeopardize the anthropometric measurements)
Who cannot join
- Both cohorts:
- Congenital malformations that make anthropometric measurements impossible.
- Family that intends to leave the study area before four months.
- Presence of medical condition requiring referral for hospitalization. Presence of medical condition requiring referral for hospitalization.
Trial locations and contacts
4 sites in 1 country.
Venezuela4 sites
Ditrict Capital centers
Caracas, Distrito Federal, 1090
La Guaira State Centers
La Guaira, 1160
Bolivar State Centers
Puerto Ordaz and San Felix, Bolívar, 8050
Miranda State Centers
Santa Lucía, Miranda, 1214
About this study
Official title: Evaluation of the Treatment of Moderate and Severe Acute Malnutrition in Outpatient Care Services in Venezuela: a Multicentric and Prospective Cohort Research
The goal of this observational study is to compare the effectiveness, safety, and efficiency of the simplified protocol, which includes the following three modifications: a) use of a single treatment product (RUTF), b) reduced dose, c) expanded cut-offs, with the standard protocol based on the 2023 World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines for the prevention and treatment of acute malnutrition in children aged 6 to 59 months, in outpatient care services of the states of Bolívar, Capital District, La Guaira, and Miranda of Venezuela.
The main question it aims to answer is:
Read more
What is the effectiveness, safety, and efficiency of the simplified protocol, which includes these three modifications (use of a single treatment product (RUTF), reduced dose, expanded cut-offs) when compared to a standard protocol that is based on the 2023 WHO guidelines for the prevention and treatment of acute malnutrition in children aged 6 to 59 months in the outpatient care services of the states of Bolívar, Capital District, La Guaira, and Miranda of Venezuela? This prospective cohort, longitudinal study will be conducted in 4 states, treating children aged 6-59 months diagnosed with uncomplicated AM, defined as WHZ <-2 or mid-upper-arm circumference (MUAC) <125mm or bilateral edema. Children will be prospectively followed for 16 weeks or until their recovery.
Researchers will compare the simplified protocol cohort with the standard protocol cohort to determine which one has the best effectiveness, safety, and efficiency indicators in the Venezuela context.
The effectiveness of the treatment will be measured by the recovery rate, duration of the treatment, and changes in anthropometry (weight, height, and arm circumference). Other treatment effects will also be measured, including how many are admitted to the hospital, death, and relapse rates from the nutritional program. An economic evaluation component will be incorporated. Total costs will be aggregated and presented as costs per child treated and per child recovered.
Read the detailed description
The general objective of the study is to compare the effectiveness, safety, and efficiency of the simplified protocol, which includes the following three modifications: a) use of a single treatment product (RUTF), b) reduced dose, c) expanded cut-offs, with the standard protocol based on the 2023 WHO guidelines for the prevention and treatment of acute malnutrition in children aged 6 to 59 months in outpatient care services in the states Bolívar, Capital District, La Guaira, and Miranda of Venezuela.
This will be a multicentric and prospective cohort study assessing the Simplified Protocol with the Standard Protocol, among children with uncomplicated acute malnutrition. Children will be prospectively followed until their recovery or for a maximum of 16 weeks.
The study will be implemented in 4 Venezuelan states chosen based on their acute malnutrition prevalence and operational constraints.
The protocol will be implemented by health professionals from each institution, duly previously trained in applying the study protocol.
- Conditions
- Acute Malnutrition in Childhood, Wasting, Child Malnutrition
- Being tested
- Simplified protocol, Standard protocol
- Keywords
- Severe acute malnutrition, Moderate acute malnutrition, Ready-to-use therapeutic food, Malnutrition treatment, Venezuela, Mid-upper arm circumference, Wasting, Simplified protocol, Standard protocol
- Medical subject headings
- Cachexia, Child Nutrition Disorders, Severe Acute Malnutrition
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Simplified protocolProcedure or surgery
MUAC-based dosing:
- SAM [MUAC <115mm or WHZ <-3 or oedema (+/++)] = Two 92g sachets Ready to use Therapeutic Food (RUTF)/day (Approx. 1000 kcal/day).
- MAM [MUAC 115mm<125mm or WHZ <-2] = One 92g sachet RUTF/day (Approx. 500 kcal/day).
Standard protocolProcedure or surgery
Weight-based dosing
- SAM: Mid-upper-arm circumference (MUAC) <115mm or Weight-Height/length Z Score <-3 or mild or moderate bipedal oedema: 150-185 kcal/kg/day is offered using RUTF until the patient passes to MAM and then the dose is reduced to 100 -130 kcal/kg/day using RUTF until recovery.
- MAM: MUAC 115-<125mm or Weight-Height/length Z Score <-2: 100-130 kcal/kg/day is offered using RUTF until recovery.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Simplified protocol | The first cohort will be composed of all children between 6 and 59 months of age who attend predefined outpatient care points in the states Distrito Capital, Miranda, and La Guaira. These children must meet the inclusion criteria for the research. For those selected in these centers, the method of nutritional treatment for acute malnutrition will be the simplified protocol. Adaptations in this protocol include:
1. Use of a single treatment product (Ready to use therapeutic food).
2. Reduced dose.
3. Expanded cut-offs. Receives: Procedure: Simplified protocol | |
| Standard protocol | The second cohort will be composed of all children between 6 and 59 months of age who attend other predefined outpatient care points in the four states and met the inclusion criteria for this research. Nutritional treatment will be administered to these children, following the WHO Standard Protocol. Receives: Procedure: Standard protocol |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Recovery rate
This indicator is defined as the number of children who recovered from SAM and MAM (WHZ>-2 and MUAC>=125mm and the absence of bilateral edema for two consecutive visits, within 16 weeks of enrollment in the program, divided by the total number of treated children.
Measured: From date of inclusion in the program until the date of recovery or 16th week after inclusion in the program or date of death from any cause, whichever came first
Weight gain
Average weight change in each protocol.
Measured: From date of inclusion in the program until the date of recovery or 16th week after inclusion in the program or date of death from any cause, whichever came first
Mid-Upper Arm Circumference (MUAC) gain
Average Mid-Upper Arm Circumference (MUAC) change in each protocol.
Measured: From date of inclusion in the program until the date of recovery or 16th week after inclusion in the program or date of death from any cause, whichever came first
Duration of the treatment
Defined as the average number of weeks spent on treatment (enrollment and recovery) in children 6-59 months of age at enrollment, according to health registers
Measured: From date of inclusion in the program until the date of recovery or 16th week after inclusion in the program or date of death from any cause, whichever came first
Prevalence of child morbidity
Defined by the number of days with symptoms of acute respiratory infections, fever, diarrhea (three or more loose or liquid stools per day) and malaria divided by the total number of days observed/reported in the recall period
Measured: From date of enrolment until the date of recovery, last documented progression or date of death from any cause, whichever came first.
Number of RUTF delivered per child
Average number of RUTF delivered per child (SAM/MAM) in each protocol
Measured: From date of inclusion in the program until the date of recovery or 16th week after inclusion in the program or date of death from any cause, whichever came first
Cost per child
Average number of dollars that cost to recovery a child in each cohort
Measured: From date of inclusion in the program until the date of recovery or 16th week after inclusion in the program or date of death from any cause, whichever came first
Secondary outcomes (1)
Prevalence of child stunting
Proportion of children with Height-for-age Z-score (LAZ)<-2 (according to the 2006 World Health Organization reference) at the end of the study
Measured: At the date of recovery or 16th week after inclusion in the program or date of death from any cause, whichever came first
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted1 Mar 2024
- Study start14 Feb 2024
- Primary completion31 Aug 2024
- Study completion31 Aug 2024
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (10)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Acute Malnutrition in ChildhoodStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 299 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- UNICEF - Venezuela
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Pablo Hernandez, MSc, Principal investigator, Nutri Consult
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06287827
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 190224
- Status last verified
- Sep 2024
- First submitted
- 19 Feb 2024
- Last updated
- 2 Oct 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Alvarez Moran JL, Ale GBF, Charle P, Sessions N, Doumbia S, Guerrero S. The effectiveness of treatment for Severe Acute Malnutrition (SAM) delivered by community health workers compared to a traditional facility based model. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Mar 27;18(1):207. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-2987-z.
PubMed 29580238Bahwere P. Severe acute malnutrition during emergencies: burden management, and gaps. Food Nutr Bull. 2014 Jun;35(2 Suppl):S47-51. doi: 10.1177/15648265140352S107.
PubMed 25069293Maust A, Koroma AS, Abla C, Molokwu N, Ryan KN, Singh L, Manary MJ. Severe and Moderate Acute Malnutrition Can Be Successfully Managed with an Integrated Protocol in Sierra Leone. J Nutr. 2015 Nov;145(11):2604-9. doi: 10.3945/jn.115.214957. Epub 2015 Sep 30.
PubMed 26423737Bailey J, Opondo C, Lelijveld N, Marron B, Onyo P, Musyoki EN, Adongo SW, Manary M, Briend A, Kerac M. A simplified, combined protocol versus standard treatment for acute malnutrition in children 6-59 months (ComPAS trial): A cluster-randomized controlled non-inferiority trial in Kenya and South Sudan. PLoS Med. 2020 Jul 9;17(7):e1003192. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003192. eCollection 2020 Jul.
PubMed 32645109Stephenson KB, Agapova SE, Hendrixson DT, Koroma AS, Manary MJ. An Optimized Dose of Therapeutic Feeding Results in Noninferior Growth in Midupper Arm Circumference Compared with a Standard Dose in Children in Sierra Leone Recovering from Acute Malnutrition. Curr Dev Nutr. 2021 Feb 2;5(2):nzab007. doi: 10.1093/cdn/nzab007. eCollection 2021 Feb.
PubMed 33659773James PT, Van den Briel N, Rozet A, Israel AD, Fenn B, Navarro-Colorado C. Low-dose RUTF protocol and improved service delivery lead to good programme outcomes in the treatment of uncomplicated SAM: a programme report from Myanmar. Matern Child Nutr. 2015 Oct;11(4):859-69. doi: 10.1111/mcn.12192. Epub 2015 Apr 7.
PubMed 25850698Daures M, Phelan K, Issoufou M, Kouanda S, Sawadogo O, Issaley K, Cazes C, Seri B, Ouaro B, Akpakpo B, Mendiboure V, Shepherd S, Becquet R. New approach to simplifying and optimising acute malnutrition treatment in children aged 6-59 months: the OptiMA single-arm proof-of-concept trial in Burkina Faso. Br J Nutr. 2020 Apr 14;123(7):756-767. doi: 10.1017/S0007114519003258. Epub 2019 Dec 10.
PubMed 31818335Hussain I, Habib A, Ariff S, Khan GN, Rizvi A, Channar S, Hussain A, Fazal S, Kumar D, Alvarez JL, Guerrero S, Grant A, Soofi SB. Effectiveness of management of severe acute malnutrition (SAM) through community health workers as compared to a traditional facility-based model: a cluster randomized controlled trial. Eur J Nutr. 2021 Oct;60(7):3853-3860. doi: 10.1007/s00394-021-02550-y. Epub 2021 Apr 20.
PubMed 33880645Lelijveld N, Bailey J, Mayberry A, Trenouth L, N'Diaye DS, Haghparast-Bidgoli H, Puett C. The "ComPAS Trial" combined treatment model for acute malnutrition: study protocol for the economic evaluation. Trials. 2018 Apr 24;19(1):252. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2594-7.
PubMed 29690899Bailey J, Lelijveld N, Marron B, Onyoo P, Ho LS, Manary M, Briend A, Opondo C, Kerac M. Combined Protocol for Acute Malnutrition Study (ComPAS) in rural South Sudan and urban Kenya: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2018 Apr 24;19(1):251. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2643-2.
PubMed 29690916
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 2 Oct 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Evaluation of the Treatment of Moderate and Severe Acute Malnutrition in Outpatient Care Services in Venezuela: a Multicentric and Prospective Cohort Research
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06287827
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 190224
- Conditions
- Acute Malnutrition in Childhood, Wasting, Child Malnutrition
- Keywords
- Severe acute malnutrition, Moderate acute malnutrition, Ready-to-use therapeutic food, Malnutrition treatment, Venezuela, Mid-upper arm circumference, Wasting, Simplified protocol
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 299 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- UNICEF - VenezuelaUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 14 Feb 2024 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Aug 2024 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 Aug 2024 (actual)
- First posted
- 1 Mar 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The goal of this observational study is to compare the effectiveness, safety, and efficiency of the simplified protocol, which includes the following three modifications: a) use of a single treatment product (RUTF), b) reduced dose, c) expanded cut-offs, with the standard protocol based on the 2023 World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines for the prevention and treatment of acute malnutrition in children aged 6 to 59 months, in outpatient care services of the states of Bolívar, Capital District, La Guaira, and Miranda of Venezuela.
The main question it aims to answer is:
What is the effectiveness, safety, and efficiency of the simplified protocol, which includes these three modifications (use of a single treatment product (RUTF), reduced dose, expanded cut-offs) when compared to a standard protocol that is based on the 2023 WHO guidelines for the prevention and treatment of acute malnutrition in children aged 6 to 59 months in the outpatient care services of the states of Bolívar, Capital District, La Guaira, and Miranda of Venezuela? This prospective cohort, longitudinal study will be conducted in 4 states, treating children aged 6-59 months diagnosed with uncomplicated AM, defined as WHZ <-2 or mid-upper-arm circumference (MUAC) <125mm or bilateral edema. Children will be prospectively followed for 16 weeks or until their recovery.
Researchers will compare the simplified protocol cohort with the standard protocol cohort to determine which one has the best effectiveness, safety, and efficiency indicators in the Venezuela context.
The effectiveness of the treatment will be measured by the recovery rate, duration of the treatment, and changes in anthropometry (weight, height, and arm circumference). Other treatment effects will also be measured, including how many are admitted to the hospital, death, and relapse rates from the nutritional program. An economic evaluation component will be incorporated. Total costs will be aggregated and presented as costs per child treated and per child recovered.
Detailed description
The general objective of the study is to compare the effectiveness, safety, and efficiency of the simplified protocol, which includes the following three modifications: a) use of a single treatment product (RUTF), b) reduced dose, c) expanded cut-offs, with the standard protocol based on the 2023 WHO guidelines for the prevention and treatment of acute malnutrition in children aged 6 to 59 months in outpatient care services in the states Bolívar, Capital District, La Guaira, and Miranda of Venezuela.
This will be a multicentric and prospective cohort study assessing the Simplified Protocol with the Standard Protocol, among children with uncomplicated acute malnutrition. Children will be prospectively followed until their recovery or for a maximum of 16 weeks.
The study will be implemented in 4 Venezuelan states chosen based on their acute malnutrition prevalence and operational constraints.
The protocol will be implemented by health professionals from each institution, duly previously trained in applying the study protocol.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Simplified protocol | – | Procedure: Simplified protocolThe first cohort will be composed of all children between 6 and 59 months of age who attend predefined outpatient care points in the states Distrito Capital, Miranda, and La Guaira. These children must meet the inclusion criteria for the research. For those selected in these centers, the method of nutritional treatment for acute malnutrition will be the simplified protocol. Adaptations in this protocol include: 1. Use of a single treatment product (Ready to use therapeutic food). 2. Reduced dose. 3. Expanded cut-offs. |
| Standard protocol | – | Procedure: Standard protocolThe second cohort will be composed of all children between 6 and 59 months of age who attend other predefined outpatient care points in the four states and met the inclusion criteria for this research. Nutritional treatment will be administered to these children, following the WHO Standard Protocol. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 6 to 59 months
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child
- Study population
- The research population consisted of children with uncomplicated moderate or severe acute malnutrition who are admitted to the nutritional care program in care centers and associated institutions in Bolívar, Capital District, La Guaira, and Miranda. Given the observational nature of the research, the sample size of the population will not be calculated. Rather, a research group or intentional sample will be analyzed, made up of all children who attend the care centers and meet the inclusion criteria of the research during a collection period of two months in each cohort.
Key inclusion criteria (25 listed)
- Simplified protocol cohort
- No medical complications
- Positive appetite test.
- MUAC <115 mm or
- Weight-Height/length Z Score <-3 or
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Both cohorts:
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Simplified protocolMUAC-based dosing: * SAM [MUAC <115mm or WHZ <-3 or oedema (+/++)] = Two 92g sachets Ready to use Therapeutic Food (RUTF)/day (Approx. 1000 kcal/day). * MAM [MUAC 115mm<125mm or WHZ <-2] = One 92g sachet RUTF/day (Approx. 500 kcal/day). | Procedure or surgery | Simplified protocol |
| Standard protocolWeight-based dosing * SAM: Mid-upper-arm circumference (MUAC) <115mm or Weight-Height/length Z Score <-3 or mild or moderate bipedal oedema: 150-185 kcal/kg/day is offered using RUTF until the patient passes to MAM and then the dose is reduced to 100 -130 kcal/kg/day using RUTF until recovery. * MAM: MUAC 115-<125mm or Weight-Height/length Z Score <-2: 100-130 kcal/kg/day is offered using RUTF until recovery. | Procedure or surgery | Standard protocol |
Primary outcome
Recovery rate
Time frame: From date of inclusion in the program until the date of recovery or 16th week after inclusion in the program or date of death from any cause, whichever came first
This indicator is defined as the number of children who recovered from SAM and MAM (WHZ>-2 and MUAC>=125mm and the absence of bilateral edema for two consecutive visits, within 16 weeks of enrollment in the program, divided by the total number of treated children.
Weight gain
Time frame: From date of inclusion in the program until the date of recovery or 16th week after inclusion in the program or date of death from any cause, whichever came first
Average weight change in each protocol.
Mid-Upper Arm Circumference (MUAC) gain
Time frame: From date of inclusion in the program until the date of recovery or 16th week after inclusion in the program or date of death from any cause, whichever came first
Average Mid-Upper Arm Circumference (MUAC) change in each protocol.
Duration of the treatment
Time frame: From date of inclusion in the program until the date of recovery or 16th week after inclusion in the program or date of death from any cause, whichever came first
Defined as the average number of weeks spent on treatment (enrollment and recovery) in children 6-59 months of age at enrollment, according to health registers
Prevalence of child morbidity
Time frame: From date of enrolment until the date of recovery, last documented progression or date of death from any cause, whichever came first.
Defined by the number of days with symptoms of acute respiratory infections, fever, diarrhea (three or more loose or liquid stools per day) and malaria divided by the total number of days observed/reported in the recall period
Number of RUTF delivered per child
Time frame: From date of inclusion in the program until the date of recovery or 16th week after inclusion in the program or date of death from any cause, whichever came first
Average number of RUTF delivered per child (SAM/MAM) in each protocol
Cost per child
Time frame: From date of inclusion in the program until the date of recovery or 16th week after inclusion in the program or date of death from any cause, whichever came first
Average number of dollars that cost to recovery a child in each cohort
1 secondary outcome
Prevalence of child stunting
Time frame: At the date of recovery or 16th week after inclusion in the program or date of death from any cause, whichever came first
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 2 Oct 2024.
- Background: PubMed 29580238Alvarez Moran JL, Ale GBF, Charle P, Sessions N, Doumbia S, Guerrero S. The effectiveness of treatment for Severe Acute Malnutrition (SAM) delivered by community health workers compared to a traditional facility based model. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Mar 27;18(1):207. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-2987-z.
- Background: PubMed 25069293Bahwere P. Severe acute malnutrition during emergencies: burden management, and gaps. Food Nutr Bull. 2014 Jun;35(2 Suppl):S47-51. doi: 10.1177/15648265140352S107.
- Background: PubMed 26423737Maust A, Koroma AS, Abla C, Molokwu N, Ryan KN, Singh L, Manary MJ. Severe and Moderate Acute Malnutrition Can Be Successfully Managed with an Integrated Protocol in Sierra Leone. J Nutr. 2015 Nov;145(11):2604-9. doi: 10.3945/jn.115.214957. Epub 2015 Sep 30.
- Results publication: PubMed 32645109Bailey J, Opondo C, Lelijveld N, Marron B, Onyo P, Musyoki EN, Adongo SW, Manary M, Briend A, Kerac M. A simplified, combined protocol versus standard treatment for acute malnutrition in children 6-59 months (ComPAS trial): A cluster-randomized controlled non-inferiority trial in Kenya and South Sudan. PLoS Med. 2020 Jul 9;17(7):e1003192. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003192. eCollection 2020 Jul.
- Results publication: PubMed 33659773Stephenson KB, Agapova SE, Hendrixson DT, Koroma AS, Manary MJ. An Optimized Dose of Therapeutic Feeding Results in Noninferior Growth in Midupper Arm Circumference Compared with a Standard Dose in Children in Sierra Leone Recovering from Acute Malnutrition. Curr Dev Nutr. 2021 Feb 2;5(2):nzab007. doi: 10.1093/cdn/nzab007. eCollection 2021 Feb.
- Results publication: PubMed 25850698James PT, Van den Briel N, Rozet A, Israel AD, Fenn B, Navarro-Colorado C. Low-dose RUTF protocol and improved service delivery lead to good programme outcomes in the treatment of uncomplicated SAM: a programme report from Myanmar. Matern Child Nutr. 2015 Oct;11(4):859-69. doi: 10.1111/mcn.12192. Epub 2015 Apr 7.
- Results publication: PubMed 31818335Daures M, Phelan K, Issoufou M, Kouanda S, Sawadogo O, Issaley K, Cazes C, Seri B, Ouaro B, Akpakpo B, Mendiboure V, Shepherd S, Becquet R. New approach to simplifying and optimising acute malnutrition treatment in children aged 6-59 months: the OptiMA single-arm proof-of-concept trial in Burkina Faso. Br J Nutr. 2020 Apr 14;123(7):756-767. doi: 10.1017/S0007114519003258. Epub 2019 Dec 10.
- Results publication: PubMed 33880645Hussain I, Habib A, Ariff S, Khan GN, Rizvi A, Channar S, Hussain A, Fazal S, Kumar D, Alvarez JL, Guerrero S, Grant A, Soofi SB. Effectiveness of management of severe acute malnutrition (SAM) through community health workers as compared to a traditional facility-based model: a cluster randomized controlled trial. Eur J Nutr. 2021 Oct;60(7):3853-3860. doi: 10.1007/s00394-021-02550-y. Epub 2021 Apr 20.
- Results publication: PubMed 29690899Lelijveld N, Bailey J, Mayberry A, Trenouth L, N'Diaye DS, Haghparast-Bidgoli H, Puett C. The "ComPAS Trial" combined treatment model for acute malnutrition: study protocol for the economic evaluation. Trials. 2018 Apr 24;19(1):252. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2594-7.
- Results publication: PubMed 29690916Bailey J, Lelijveld N, Marron B, Onyoo P, Ho LS, Manary M, Briend A, Opondo C, Kerac M. Combined Protocol for Acute Malnutrition Study (ComPAS) in rural South Sudan and urban Kenya: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2018 Apr 24;19(1):251. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2643-2.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Acute Malnutrition in Childhood
Not yet recruiting
The Relapse to Acute Malnutrition Prevention (RAMP) Trial
Acute Malnutrition in Childhood, Acute Malnutrition, Severe
RecruitingPhase 4
Opportunistic Pneumococcal Immunisation Trial in MALnutrition
Severe Acute Malnutrition in Childhood, Pneumococcal Disease
Active, not recruiting
Regular Growth Monitoring (RGM) of Young Children in Guinea-Bissau
Severe Acute Malnutrition, Moderate Acute Malnutrition (MAM)
Not yet recruiting
Treatment of Severe Acute Malnutrition in Children 6 to 59 Months Old With Standard Ready To Use Therapeutic Food Compared to a Newly Formulated Lipid Optimized Ready To Use Therapeutic Food
Severe Acute Malnutrition in Childhood, Malnutrition, Child
Recruiting
The DECIDE-TB Trial; Validation of Treatment Decision Algorithms for Childhood Tuberculosis
Tuberculosis, Child Health
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Pablo Hernandez, MSc principal investigator
Nutri Consult
4 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Acute Malnutrition in Childhood and Wasting, run by UNICEF - Venezuela at 4 sites in Venezuela.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 25 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 2 Oct 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 4 sites in Venezuela. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Recovery rate (time frame: From date of inclusion in the program until the date of recovery or 16th week after inclusion in the program or date of death from any cause, whichever came first). The study lists 7 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06287827, which also lists 10 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 2 Oct 2024.