AzTrials
AzTrials

TuberculosisDTBNCT06593080

The DECIDE-TB Trial; Validation of Treatment Decision Algorithms for Childhood Tuberculosis

A study testing The comprehensive TDA based approach in people with Tuberculosis and Child Health, run by Chishala Chabala at 29 sites in Zambia.

Recruiting

Looking for participants now. Contact the study team or a site below to ask about taking part.

Sites and contacts
Official record

Search all trials

Trial summary

The Decide-TB project aims to generate evidence for the implementation of a comprehensive Treatment Decision Algorithms (TDA) based approach for TB in children living in high TB burden and resource-limited countries, at District Hospital (DH) and Primary Health Centre (PHC) levels, and to facilitate the integration of… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages Up to 14 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Tuberculosis, Child Health, HIV
What is being tested?
The comprehensive TDA based approach
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
30,240 participants
Where
29 sitesZambia
Study dates
1 Jun 2024to 31 Aug 2027
Phase
Interventional

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Up to 14 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Child

Who may be able to join

  • The effectiveness assessment will be conducted using aggregated or individual data from direct beneficiaries of the intervention:
  • All sick children aged below 15 years entering the selected health facilities (DH and PHC) at either outpatient (OPD) or inpatient (IPD) departments, including children from high-risk groups, as well as children identified as contact of TB cases through community- or facility-based household contact tracing.
  • Children with presumptive TB.
  • The WHO definition of presumptive TB will be used, as defined in the 2022 WHO Operational Handbook, namely: children are classified as having presumptive TB if they have unremitting symptoms lasting more than 2 weeks (any one of cough, fever, not eating well or anorexia, weight loss or failure to thrive, fatigue, reduced playfulness or decreased activity) .
  • The definitions of presumptive TB have been adapted locally for the programmatic pilot. All children with presumptive TB as defined locally will be considered in the intervention and in secondary effectiveness and sub-group analyses.
  • High-risk group will be defined using the definition in WHO-suggested TDAs A\&B as children younger than 2 years, CLHIV or children with SAM. CLHIV will be defined per national testing strategy including positive PCR test for children below the age of 18 months. Children will be considered to have SAM (and thereby be eligible for the TB-Speed SAM algorithm) using WHO criteria. These include being <5 years with a weight-for-height Z score (WHZ) < -3 SDs or mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC) < 115 mm (in children over 6 months) or clinical signs of bilateral pitting oedema, and being aged ≥5 years with a body mass index (BMI) for age Z-score < -3SD.

Who cannot join

  • There will be no exclusion criteria for the programmatic pilot: all children will be offered the intervention.

Trial locations and contacts

29 sites in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

29 sites in 1 country

Zambia29 sites, 29 recruiting
  • Chawama Urban Health Centre

    Chingola, Copperbelt

    Recruiting
  • Chiwempala Urban Health Centre

    Chingola, Copperbelt

    Recruiting
  • Kabundi East Urban Health Clinic

    Chingola, Copperbelt

    Recruiting
  • Kasompe Urban Health Centre

    Chingola, Copperbelt

    Recruiting
  • Muchinshi Rural Health Centre

    Chingola, Copperbelt

    Recruiting
  • Nchanga 1 Urban Health Centre

    Chingola, Copperbelt

    Recruiting
  • Nchanga North Referal Hospital

    Chingola, Copperbelt

    Recruiting
  • Chipepo Rural Health Centre

    Chirundu, Southern Province

    Recruiting
  • Hachipilika Rural Health Centre

    Chirundu, Southern Province

    Recruiting
  • Jamba Rural Health Centre

    Chirundu, Southern Province

    Recruiting
  • Kapululira Rural Health Centre

    Chirundu, Southern Province

    Recruiting
  • Lusitu Rural Health Centre

    Chirundu, Southern Province

    Recruiting
  • Mtendere Mission Referal hospital

    Chirundu, Southern Province

    Recruiting
  • Sikoongo Rural Health Centre

    Chirundu, Southern Province

    Recruiting
  • Habulile Rural Health Centre

    Kalomo, Southern Province

    Recruiting
  • Kalomo District Hospital

    Kalomo, Southern Province

    Recruiting
  • Kalomo Urban Health Centre

    Kalomo, Southern Province

    Recruiting
  • Mawaya Urban Health Centre

    Kalomo, Southern Province

    Recruiting
  • Namwianga Urban Health Centre

    Kalomo, Southern Province

    Recruiting
  • Nkandanzovu Rural Health Centre

    Kalomo, Southern Province

    Recruiting
  • Siachitema Rural Health Centre

    Kalomo, Southern Province

    Recruiting
  • Allessandras Urban Health Centre

    Luanshya, Copperbelt

    Recruiting
  • Chaisa Urban Health Centre

    Luanshya, Copperbelt

    Recruiting
  • Fisenge Urban Health Centre

    Luanshya, Copperbelt

    Recruiting
  • Kawama Urban Health Centre

    Luanshya, Copperbelt

    Recruiting
  • Malaika Urban Health Centre

    Luanshya, Copperbelt

    Recruiting
  • Mikomfwa Urban Health Centre

    Luanshya, Copperbelt

    Recruiting
  • Roan Antelope General Hospital

    Luanshya, Copperbelt

    Alan Kachuka

    Natasha Namuziya

    Recruiting
  • Thomson District Hospital

    Luanshya, Copperbelt

    Recruiting

Other trials in Zambia

About this study

Official title: Validation of Treatment Decision Algorithms for Childhood Tuberculosis at District Health Care Levels in Mozambique and Zambia - the Decide-TB Cluster-randomized Pragmatic Trial

The Decide-TB project aims to generate evidence for the implementation of a comprehensive Treatment Decision Algorithms (TDA) based approach for TB in children living in high TB burden and resource-limited countries, at District Hospital (DH) and Primary Health Centre (PHC) levels, and to facilitate the integration of this evidence within practices and policies.

This programmatic pilot led by the National TB Programs (NTP) will test a TDA-based approach integrating TB screening, diagnosis, treatment decision-making, and disease severity assessment for shorter treatment eligibility, for use at a lower level of healthcare. This TDA-based approach will be evaluated in a hybrid effectiveness implementation study based on a pragmatic stepped wedge cluster-randomized trial. The Decide TB project will be implemented at the district level, targeting five districts in each country. Each cluster in a district will be made up of one district hospital and six primary health centers. The study will develop a Clinical Decision Support System (CDSS) to operationalize the use of TDAs, and strengthen District Health Information Systems (DHIS2) to collect individual data, which will contribute to monitoring and evaluation, clinical mentoring, and supervision by the country's NTPs.

Read the detailed description

The Decide-TB trial is a pragmatic cluster-randomized study utilizing a stepped wedge design to provide scientific evidence on a comprehensive TDA-based approach for TB screening, diagnosis, and treatment in children under 15 years at low healthcare levels in Zambia and Mozambique.

The trial's primary objective is to evaluate the effectiveness, feasibility, implementation, acceptability, costs, cost-effectiveness, and adoption of a TDA-based approach for childhood TB screening, diagnosis, and treatment decision-making under programmatic conditions at District Hospitals (DH) and Primary Health Centres (PHC) levels in these countries.

There are five specific objectives corresponding to the trial's research components:

  1. To assess the effectiveness of the comprehensive TDA-based approach in increasing TB case detection in children as compared to the Standard of Care (SOC), and in providing good quality TB diagnosis and treatment decision (diagnostic accuracy and reliability of treatment decision for TB and shorter treatment).
  2. To describe the implementation and the feasibility of using the comprehensive TDA-based approach, including associated digital tools, and to identify contextual determinants influencing implementation and contribute to improved implementation/adaptations throughout intervention delivery.
  3. To assess preferences, acceptability, and perceived feasibility of using the comprehensive TDA-based approach, including associated digital tools, among end-users, beneficiaries, and key stakeholders.
  4. To assess the costs from the health system and the beneficiary (parents/caregivers of children) perspective, the cost-effectiveness of using the comprehensive TDA-based approach, including associated digital tools, and the budget impact of scaling up the intervention.
  5. To assess the factors and stakeholders that support or constrain the adoption of the comprehensive TDA-based approach as health policy at district level.

The intervention will be implemented as a programmatic pilot, following the National TB Programs' decision in Mozambique and Zambia to adopt a TDA-based approach in line with World Health Organisation's (WHO) conditional recommendations. Additionally, both the standard of care and the intervention will be implemented in a non-randomized district to document diagnostic accuracy throughout the trial. The Decide-TB trial is a hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial (type 2), assessing both the clinical intervention's effectiveness and the feasibility and utility of the implementation strategy.

Diagnostic accuracy of both the standard of care and the intervention will be evaluated in an additional district, which will transition to the intervention phase alongside the last district selected per the stepped wedge design. Aggregated data will be retrospectively collected over 12 months from all participating districts and health facilities.

The Decide-TB trial endpoints include effectiveness, acceptability, implementation, health economics, and health policy. Effectiveness endpoints include the proportion of children who started TB treatment, the time it takes to make a treatment decision, and the consistency of TDA results with final treatment decisions, among other factors. Acceptability endpoints consider user preferences and local social value, whereas implementation endpoints evaluate the practicality, fidelity, contextual aspects, and sustainability of the TDA-based method. Health economics endpoints include cost assessments, cost-effectiveness, and budget impact of scaling up the TDA-based approach vs the standard of care, while health policy endpoints look at key stakeholders' roles, practices, and policy translation processes.

Being tested
The comprehensive TDA based approach
Medical subject headings
Tuberculosis, Severe Acute Malnutrition

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • The comprehensive TDA based approachOther

    The intervention consists of implementing a comprehensive TDA-based approach for TB diagnosis and treatment decision-making, including shorter treatment for non-severe TB in children identified as TB presumptive cases through a CDSS. It will also include the management of high-risk groups. In practice, all sick children will be assessed using the WHO-suggested TDAs A with CXR (DH) and B without CXR (PHC). CLHIV and those hospitalised with SAM at DH will have further assessment and treatment decisions based on the PAANTHER and TB-Speed SAM TDAs, respectively.

    Clinical and microbiological assessment data will be incorporated into a CDSS to help with the clinical decision to initiate TB treatment. The CDSS will incorporate specific features and test results for high-risk group children based on the PAANTHER TDA and the TB-Speed SAM TDA and will incorporate the results of the severity assessment to guide the choice of TB treatment duration once children are diagnosed with TB.

Study groups in NCT06593080
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Standard of CareNo interventionThe District Hospitals and Primary Health Centres in study districts will implement TB diagnosis for children as per the current Standard of Care (control) in both countries . In Mozambique, the SOC is based on local algorithms which include: TB symptoms screening (TB contact history), HIV testing, Xpert testing on induced sputum (and stool), and a tuberculin skin test. Urine Lipoarabinomannan (LAM) is indicated for Children Living with HIV (CLHIV). No CXR is performed. In Zambia, the SOC is based on the Union desk guide algorithm which includes: TB symptom screening (TB contact history), HIV testing and Xpert testing on respiratory or stool samples. Urine LAM is indicated for CLHIV,Severe Acute Malnutrition, sepsis, immune-suppression; chronic kidney diseases and cancer. CXRs are performed depending on the facilities. Other tests and imaging are advised in presumed extrapulmonary TB cases. A confirmed TB diagnosis is made based on a positive Xpert or LAM test.
The comprehensive TDA based approachExperimentalChildren will benefit from the country SOC as described in the control arm, plus the study intervention
Receives: Other: The comprehensive TDA based approach

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Effectiveness endpoints: Children initiated on TB treatment

    Proportion of children started on treatment for TB among sick children attending care at participant health facilities for any health complaints

    Measured: Throughout the study, an average of 24 months

Secondary outcomes (35)
  1. Effectiveness endpoints: Children treated for TB among those with presumptive TB

    Proportion of children treated for TB among those with presumptive TB, including children with microbiologically confirmed TB.

    Measured: Throughout the study, an average of 24 months

  2. Effectiveness endpoints: TB treatment proportion in high-risk pediatric groups

    Proportion of children from high-risk groups treated for TB (age <2 years, CLHIV, children with SAM) i) among all children from high-risk groups attending care, ii) among children from high-risk groups with presumptive TB.

    Measured: Throughout the study, an average of 24 months

  3. Effectiveness endpoints: Microbiologically confirmed TB cases

    Proportion of children with TB that are microbiologically confirmed (i.e. smear or Xpert or LAM positive), ratio of <5 to 5-14 years among children with TB, ratio of pulmonary TB to extrapulmonary TB (EPTB).

    Measured: Throughout the study, an average of 24 months

  4. Effectiveness endpoints: Time to TDA assessment completion

    Time from presumptive TB identification to final TB treatment decision and access to TB diagnostic assessment defined as the proportion of children with presumptive TB having completed assessment with the TDAs and CDSS, including in high-risk groups.

    Measured: From the start of intervention to the end of the project, an average of 21 months

  5. Effectiveness endpoints: Concordance of TDA results and TB treatment decisions

    Concordance of the TDA result and the final TB treatment decision using the proportion of children wrongly initiated or not initiated on TB treatment defined as: i) children not started on TB treatment despite positive score; ii) children initiated on TB treatment despite negative score. Reasons for both decisions will be collected.

    Measured: From the start of intervention to the end of the intervention, an average of 21 months

  6. Effectiveness endpoints: Missed and over-diagnosed TB cases

    Proportion of missed TB cases (false negative) and over-diagnosed TB cases (unlikely TB with a positive score, i.e. false positive).

    Measured: From the start of intervention to the end of the intervention, an average of 21 months

  7. Effectiveness endpoints: Concordance of TB severity evaluation and treatment regimen decision

    Concordance of the severity evaluation and decision for short TB treatment regimen using the proportion of i) children with 4-month TB treatment regimen used despite severe disease as assessed by the clinical/CXR evaluation; ii) children with 6-month TB treatment regimen despite non-severe disease as assessed by the clinical/CXR evaluation.

    Measured: From the start of intervention to the end of the intervention, an average of 21 months

  8. Effectiveness endpoints: False positive and negative TB severity assessments

    Proportion of false positive and false negative TB severity assessments at low level of health care: i) children with non-severe disease according to clinical criteria despite severe disease as evaluated by expert CXR read; ii) children with clinically assessed severe disease despite non-severe disease as evaluated by expert CXR read.

    Measured: From the start of intervention to the end of the intervention, an average of 21 months

  9. Effectiveness endpoints: Non-severe TB cases initiated on shorter treatment

    Proportion of children with presumptive TB and with non-severe TB disease initiated on shorter TB treatment.

    Measured: From the start of intervention to the end of the intervention, an average of 21 months

  10. Effectiveness endpoints: TB treatment outcomes stratified by severity and regimen duration.

    TB treatment outcomes as defined per WHO (treatment success, cured, treatment completion, loss to follow-up, death, treatment failure) overall and stratified by severity and regimen duration.

    Measured: From the start of intervention to the end of the intervention, an average of 21 months

  11. Effectiveness endpoints: Deaths averted

    Number of deaths averted assessed through modelling.

    Measured: From the start of intervention to the end of the intervention, an average of 21 months

  12. Effectiveness endpoints: Child TB among all diagnosed TB cases, including adults

    Number of adults with TB, including microbiologically confirmed TB, and proportion of all TB diagnosed that is child TB.

    Measured: Throughout the study, an average of 24 months

  13. Acceptability endpoints: Preferences

    Proportion of healthcare providers' preferences in delivering childhood TB screening, diagnosis, and treatment decision-making, comparing the comprehensive TDA-based approach vs. the Standard of Care (SOC) approach, as assessed by TB diagnosis questionnaire, a self-administered questionnaire, completed every 3months in both arms, by all healthcare providers involved in child care.

    Measured: Throughout the study, an average of 24 months

  14. Acceptability endpoints: Local social value (users)

    Proportion of healthcare providers' preferences/ alignment with values and perceived potential to impact on lived experience) of the comprehensive TDA-based approach, including associated digital tools, to users (healthcare providers) as part of their work duties in childhood TB care, assessed by questionnaires.

    Measured: Throughout the study, an average of 24 months

  15. Acceptability endpoints: Local social value (beneficiaries)

    Proportion of beneficiaries' (children and their caregivers receiving a diagnosis of TB) local social value of the comprehensive TDA-based approach, including associated digital tools, as assessed by interviews and group discussions

    Measured: Throughout the study, an average of 24 months

  16. Acceptability endpoints:Health systems and socioeconomic factors

    Number of health systems and socioeconomic factors influencing preferences and local social value of the comprehensive TDA-based approach, including associated digital tools, for users and beneficiaries, as assessed by questionnaires, interviews and group discussions

    Measured: Throughout the study, an average of 24 months

  17. Implementation endpoints: Feasibility

    Feasibility of implementing and delivering the comprehensive TDA-based approach, including associated digital tools: health systems, logistical, managerial, challenges faced during implementation, and solutions found as assessed by the TB diagnosis questionnaire.

    Measured: From the start of intervention to the end of the intervention, an average of 21 months

  18. Implementation endpoints: Fidelity

    Fidelity to intervention delivery and to implementation strategies: adherence to intervention procedures and implementation guide/manuals, adaptations, quality of implementation and intervention delivery.Assessed based on project process data (for example number and regularity of support supervision visits achieved compared to what was planned); fidelity of intervention delivery will based on the TB diagnosis questionnaire (number of health care worker reporting using TDAs to diagnose TB in children).

    Measured: From the start of intervention to the end of the intervention, an average of 21 months

  19. Implementation endpoints: Contextual factors

    Number of contextual factors influencing intervention delivery and implementation (at Individual, facility, health systems and community-level): barriers and facilitators as assessed by questionnaires, interviews and group discussions.

    Measured: From the start of intervention to the end of the intervention, an average of 21 months

  20. Implementation endpoints: Sustained intervention delivery

    Number of facilities reporting using TDAs for childhood TB diagnosis 6 months post intervention period as assessed by sustainability questionaries.

    Measured: 6 months post intervention

  21. Health economics endpoints: Cost analysis 1

    Total TB care costs from the health system perspective.

    Measured: Throughout the study, an average of 24 months

  22. Health economics endpoints: Cost analysis 2

    Unit cost per TB care activity (e.g. clinical assessment, CXR).

    Measured: Throughout the study, an average of 24 months

  23. Health economics endpoints: Cost analysis 3

    Total TB care costs of overdiagnosis (false positive)

    Measured: From the start of intervention to the end of the intervention, an average of 21 months

  24. Health economics endpoints: Cost analysis 4

    Total costs incurred by parents/caregivers for receiving child TB care

    Measured: Throughout the study, an average of 24 months

  25. Health economics endpoints: Cost effectiveness; Modelled health impact measure 1

    Number of children treated for TB.

    Measured: Throughout the study, an average of 24 months

  26. Health economics endpoints: Cost effectiveness; Modelled health impact measure 2

    Number of adults treated for TB.

    Measured: Throughout the study, an average of 24 months

  27. Health economics endpoints: Cost effectiveness; Modelled health impact measure 3

    Number of deaths.

    Measured: Throughout the study, an average of 24 months

  28. Health economics endpoints: Cost effectiveness; Modelled health impact measure 4

    Measure of healthy life lost, either through premature death or living with disability due to illness; Disability-Adjusted Life Years (DALYs)

    Measured: Throughout the study, an average of 24 months

  29. Health economics endpoints: Cost effectiveness- Incremental cost 1

    Incremental number of children treated for TB.

    Measured: Throughout the study, an average of 24 months

  30. Health economics endpoints: Cost effectiveness- Incremental cost 2

    Incremental cost per Death averted.

    Measured: Throughout the study, an average of 24 months

  31. Health economics endpoints: Cost effectiveness- Incremental cost 3

    Incremental cost per DALY averted.

    Measured: Throughout the study, an average of 24 months

  32. Health economics endpoints: Budget impact 1

    Cost of scaling up the comprehensive TDA-based approach nationally.

    Measured: Throughout the study; an average duration of 24 months and extending up to 5 years after its conclusion.

  33. Health economics endpoints: Budget impact 2

    Cumulative number of children and adults treated for TB, lives saved, and DALYs averted during a 5-year scale-up.

    Measured: Throughout the study; an average duration of 24 months and extending up to 5 years after its conclusion.

  34. Health Policy endpoints: Roles, practices and processes

    Roles, practices and processes among implementers and decision-makers of the comprehensive TDA-based approach, including associated digital tools, at district-level.

    Measured: Throughout the study, an average of 24 months

  35. Health policy endpoints: Translation mechanism

    Mechanism of translation of the research results and evidence on the comprehensive TDA-based approach, including associated digital tools, into public policies and practices: experience and perceptions of key stakeholders at regional, national and district-level.

    Measured: At the end of the project, after 24 months since the start of the project

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted19 Sep 2024
  2. Study start1 Jun 2024
  3. Primary completion31 Aug 2027 (estimated)
  4. Study completion31 Aug 2027 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Diagnosis
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Sequential
Model description
Stepped Wedge Design
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
30,240 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06593080
Sponsor's protocol ID
DECIDE-TB
Acronym
DTB
Status last verified
Mar 2026
First submitted
1 Aug 2024
Last updated
24 Mar 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: Individual participant data (IPD) will be available after de-identification. Access to the IPD dataset for each specific publication will be provided upon request to the coordinating investigators and with approval by the study sponsors and scientific oversight committee.

Publications

  • Orne-Gliemann J, Roucher C, Khosa C, Hoddinott G, d'Elbee M, Huyen Ton Nu Nguyet M, Banze D, Bonnet M, Cossa K, Desselas E, Dodd PJ, Etoa C, Kachuka A, Lebrun N, Lungu P, Jose B, Manguele S, Monin C, Mubanga A, Mutemba C, Namuziya N, Olbrich L, Palmer M, van der Zalm MM, Seddon JA, Chabala C, Marcy O; Decide TB study group. Validation of treatment decision algorithms for childhood tuberculosis at district healthcare levels in Mozambique and Zambia: the Decide TB cluster-randomised pragmatic trial - a study protocol. BMJ Open. 2026 May 15;16(5):e114005. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-114005.

    PubMed 42152442

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in