Psychotic EpisodeDIPEMNCT06263933
Effect of Experience Sharing and Mutual Assistance on Insight and Recovery During the First Psychotic Episode
A study testing Insight Scale, Semi-directional interviews and routine care in people with Psychotic Episode, run by Centre hospitalier de Ville-Evrard, France at 1 site in France.
Trial summary
Controlled, prospective, qualitative and quantitative trial. The goal of this trial is to evaluate the mutual assistance early intervention device efficacy and its impact on insight and personal recovery of participants living with a first psychotic episode. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 40 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Psychotic Episode
- What is being tested?
- Insight Scale, Semi-directional interviews and routine care
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 50 participants
- Where
- 1 siteFrance
- Study dates
- 13 Nov 2023to 13 Nov 2025
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 40 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Man or woman between 18 and 40 years old
- First psychotic episode under the guidance of a doctor
- Brief psycotic trouble (SM-V)
- Presenting a first psychiatry hospitalization (all modalities hospitalizations combined)
- Fluent in French language (read and written)
- Patient affiliated to a social protection system or beneficiary of Medical Aid of State
- Patient having signed informed consent for his participation in the protocol
Who cannot join
- Patients whose clinical condition does not allow them to participate in research
- Patients placed in isolation rooms during the intervention
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
France1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Etablissement Public de Santé de Ville-Evrard
Neuilly-sur-Marne, 93330
Rusheenthira Thavaseelan, 0143093232 ext. 033, r.thavaseelan@epsve.fr
Dominique Januel, 0143093232 ext. 033, d.januel@epsve.fr
About this study
Controlled, prospective, qualitative and quantitative trial. The goal of this trial is to evaluate the mutual assistance early intervention device efficacy and its impact on insight and personal recovery of participants living with a first psychotic episode. This intervention lasts 5 days with 1 session per day of 1 hour 30 minutes. Three evaluations, before the intervention, after intervention and 1 month after the hospitalization's end.
- Conditions
- Psychotic Episode
- Being tested
- Insight Scale, Semi-directional interviews, routine care, session of mutual assistance with a mediator psychologist
- Keywords
- retablishment, insight, mutual assistance, peer helper, psychiatric hospitalization, first psychotic episode
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Insight ScaleOther
Also called stage of recovery scale
Before the patient was in DIPEM or control group and after the patient is involved in DIPEM or control group
Semi-directional interviewsOther
In the end of the intervention. In the end of DIPEM Or in the end of control group.
This intervention will be held after one month of hospitalization.
routine careOther
routine care
session of mutual assistance with a mediator psychologistOther
session of mutual assistance with a mediator psychologist
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Control group | Sham comparator | Patients are followed in routine care. Receives: Other: Insight Scale; Other: Semi-directional interviews; Other: routine care |
| DIPEM group | Experimental | Patients have 5 session of mutual assistance with a mediator psychologist, during five days, with 1 session per day. Each session lasts 1h30, with 45 min for atelier, 15 min for pause and 30 min about collective discussion. Receives: Other: Insight Scale; Other: Semi-directional interviews; Other: session of mutual assistance with a mediator psychologist |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
The level of the increasing of The INSIGHT scale
Used the "Echelle de conscience de trouble" - insight scale. There are 8 items, with 3 choices for each items : agree, disagree, unsure. The time is 5 minutes.
Maximum score = 12, very good Insight Minimum score= 0, No Insight 9 and more= good insight
Measured: at baseline (T0) and at 5 days after the intervention's beginning (T1).
Secondary outcomes (2)
The increase of Recovery Scale
Scale of recovery "Stage of recovery instrument" (STORI). The time is 25 minutes. There are 5 dimensions of recovery, with 10 groups of questions, with 50 items in total. There is 5 choices for each items, with "0" to "2" for "not at all true currently" and "3" to "5" is "completely true currently".
Measured: At baseline (T0) and at 5 days after the intervention's beginning (T1).
The semi-structured interview
For the first semi-structured interview, with 11 questions on 3 themes : the crisis course and the hospitalization, the role of peers during hospitalization and finally afterwards hospitalization. For the second semi-structured interview, there are 13 questions with 4 themes : the hospitalization living, psychosocial functioning, trouble awareness and management of symptoms.
Measured: At baseline (T0) and at 1 month after the hospitalization's end (T2).
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted16 Feb 2024
- Study start13 Nov 2023
- Primary completion13 Nov 2024 (estimated)
- Study completion13 Nov 2025 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (8)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Psychotic EpisodeStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- A control group and a intervention group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 50 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Centre hospitalier de Ville-Evrard, France
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Dominique JANUEL, Centre hospitalier de Ville-Evrard, France
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06263933
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2023-A01804-41
- Acronym
- DIPEM
- Status last verified
- Dec 2023
- First submitted
- 3 Jan 2024
- Last updated
- 16 Feb 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Andresen R, Oades L, Caputi P. The experience of recovery from schizophrenia: towards an empirically validated stage model. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2003 Oct;37(5):586-94. doi: 10.1046/j.1440-1614.2003.01234.x.
PubMed 14511087Courtet P. [Suicidal risk during the first psychotic episode]. Encephale. 2018 Dec;44(6S):S39-S43. doi: 10.1016/S0013-7006(19)30078-8. French.
PubMed 30935486Fennig S, Kovasznay B, Rich C, Ram R, Pato C, Miller A, Rubinstein J, Carlson G, Schwartz JE, Phelan J, et al. Six-month stability of psychiatric diagnoses in first-admission patients with psychosis. Am J Psychiatry. 1994 Aug;151(8):1200-8. doi: 10.1176/ajp.151.8.1200.
PubMed 8037256Franck N. [How to involve patients with schizophrenia in their treatment using psychoeducation]. Presse Med. 2016 Sep;45(9):742-8. doi: 10.1016/j.lpm.2016.07.012. Epub 2016 Aug 12. French.
PubMed 27526987Kessler RC, Amminger GP, Aguilar-Gaxiola S, Alonso J, Lee S, Ustun TB. Age of onset of mental disorders: a review of recent literature. Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2007 Jul;20(4):359-64. doi: 10.1097/YCO.0b013e32816ebc8c.
PubMed 17551351Malla A, McGorry P. Early Intervention in Psychosis in Young People: A Population and Public Health Perspective. Am J Public Health. 2019 Jun;109(S3):S181-S184. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2019.305018.
PubMed 31242015Souaiby L, Gaillard R, Krebs MO. [Duration of untreated psychosis: A state-of-the-art review and critical analysis]. Encephale. 2016 Aug;42(4):361-6. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2015.09.007. Epub 2016 May 6. French.
PubMed 27161262Thompson KN, McGorry PD, Harrigan SM. Reduced awareness of illness in first-episode psychosis. Compr Psychiatry. 2001 Nov-Dec;42(6):498-503. doi: 10.1053/comp.2001.27900.
PubMed 11704943
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 16 Feb 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Effect of Experience Sharing and Mutual Assistance on Insight and Recovery During the First Psychotic Episode
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06263933
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- DIPEM / 2023-A01804-41
- Conditions
- Psychotic Episode
- Keywords
- retablishment, insight, mutual assistance, peer helper, psychiatric hospitalization, first psychotic episode
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 50 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Centre hospitalier de Ville-Evrard, FranceUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 13 Nov 2023 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 13 Nov 2024 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 13 Nov 2025 (estimated)
- First posted
- 16 Feb 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Controlled, prospective, qualitative and quantitative trial. The goal of this trial is to evaluate the mutual assistance early intervention device efficacy and its impact on insight and personal recovery of participants living with a first psychotic episode. This intervention lasts 5 days with 1 session per day of 1 hour 30 minutes. Three evaluations, before the intervention, after intervention and 1 month after the hospitalization's end.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- A control group and a intervention group
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Control group | Sham comparator | Other: Insight Scale, Other: Semi-directional interviews, Other: routine carePatients are followed in routine care. |
| DIPEM group | Experimental | Other: Insight Scale, Other: Semi-directional interviews, Other: session of mutual assistance with a mediator psychologistPatients have 5 session of mutual assistance with a mediator psychologist, during five days, with 1 session per day. Each session lasts 1h30, with 45 min for atelier, 15 min for pause and 30 min about collective discussion. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 40 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Man or woman between 18 and 40 years old
- First psychotic episode under the guidance of a doctor
- Brief psycotic trouble (SM-V)
- Presenting a first psychiatry hospitalization (all modalities hospitalizations combined)
- Fluent in French language (read and written)
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Patients whose clinical condition does not allow them to participate in research
- Patients placed in isolation rooms during the intervention
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Insight ScaleAlso: stage of recovery scaleBefore the patient was in DIPEM or control group and after the patient is involved in DIPEM or control group | Other | Control group, DIPEM group |
| Semi-directional interviewsIn the end of the intervention. In the end of DIPEM Or in the end of control group. This intervention will be held after one month of hospitalization. | Other | Control group, DIPEM group |
| routine careroutine care | Other | Control group |
| session of mutual assistance with a mediator psychologistsession of mutual assistance with a mediator psychologist | Other | DIPEM group |
Primary outcome
The level of the increasing of The INSIGHT scale
Time frame: at baseline (T0) and at 5 days after the intervention's beginning (T1).
Used the "Echelle de conscience de trouble" - insight scale. There are 8 items, with 3 choices for each items : agree, disagree, unsure. The time is 5 minutes. Maximum score = 12, very good Insight Minimum score= 0, No Insight 9 and more= good insight
2 secondary outcomes
The increase of Recovery Scale
Time frame: At baseline (T0) and at 5 days after the intervention's beginning (T1).
The semi-structured interview
Time frame: At baseline (T0) and at 1 month after the hospitalization's end (T2).
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 16 Feb 2024.
- Background: PubMed 14511087Andresen R, Oades L, Caputi P. The experience of recovery from schizophrenia: towards an empirically validated stage model. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2003 Oct;37(5):586-94. doi: 10.1046/j.1440-1614.2003.01234.x.
- Background: PubMed 30935486Courtet P. [Suicidal risk during the first psychotic episode]. Encephale. 2018 Dec;44(6S):S39-S43. doi: 10.1016/S0013-7006(19)30078-8. French.
- Background: PubMed 8037256Fennig S, Kovasznay B, Rich C, Ram R, Pato C, Miller A, Rubinstein J, Carlson G, Schwartz JE, Phelan J, et al. Six-month stability of psychiatric diagnoses in first-admission patients with psychosis. Am J Psychiatry. 1994 Aug;151(8):1200-8. doi: 10.1176/ajp.151.8.1200.
- Background: PubMed 27526987Franck N. [How to involve patients with schizophrenia in their treatment using psychoeducation]. Presse Med. 2016 Sep;45(9):742-8. doi: 10.1016/j.lpm.2016.07.012. Epub 2016 Aug 12. French.
- Background: PubMed 17551351Kessler RC, Amminger GP, Aguilar-Gaxiola S, Alonso J, Lee S, Ustun TB. Age of onset of mental disorders: a review of recent literature. Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2007 Jul;20(4):359-64. doi: 10.1097/YCO.0b013e32816ebc8c.
- Background: PubMed 31242015Malla A, McGorry P. Early Intervention in Psychosis in Young People: A Population and Public Health Perspective. Am J Public Health. 2019 Jun;109(S3):S181-S184. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2019.305018.
- Background: PubMed 27161262Souaiby L, Gaillard R, Krebs MO. [Duration of untreated psychosis: A state-of-the-art review and critical analysis]. Encephale. 2016 Aug;42(4):361-6. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2015.09.007. Epub 2016 May 6. French.
- Background: PubMed 11704943Thompson KN, McGorry PD, Harrigan SM. Reduced awareness of illness in first-episode psychosis. Compr Psychiatry. 2001 Nov-Dec;42(6):498-503. doi: 10.1053/comp.2001.27900.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Psychotic Episode
RecruitingObservational study
The ATP Project (Antipsychotic-TEP-Psychosis)
First Episose Psychosis, Metabolic Disease
Recruiting
French Minds Cohort: a French Longitudinal and Multimodal Cohort of Patients With Major Mood Disorders, Psychotic Disorders, Autism Spectrum Disorders, and Healthy Controls
Schizophrenia / Schizoaffective Disorder, First Episode Psychosis (FEP)
RecruitingObservational study
Deep Phenotyping for Clinical Inferring Response in Treatment Resistant Depression
Depressive; Disorder, Major, Single Episode, Major, With Psychotic Symptoms, Depressive; Disorder, Major, Single Episode, Major (Without Psychotic Symptoms)
RecruitingPhase 3
Stratification and Treatment in Early Psychosis Study - ENHANCE
Psychosis, First Episode Psychosis
Not yet recruiting
Mobile Application-Based Interventions for Cannabis Use in Young Adults With First Episode Psychosis
First Episode Psychosis (FEP), Psychosis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Insight Scale, Semi-directional interviews and routine care in people with Psychotic Episode, run by Centre hospitalier de Ville-Evrard, France at 1 site in France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Feb 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Rusheenthira Thavaseelan (0143093232 ext. 033, r.thavaseelan@epsve.fr), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
The level of the increasing of The INSIGHT scale (time frame: at baseline (T0) and at 5 days after the intervention's beginning (T1).). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06263933, which also lists 8 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Feb 2024; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 7 Nov 2026.