AzTrials
AzTrials

PainVR TMD EEGNCT06214923

Neural Mechanisms of Immersive Virtual Reality in Chronic Pain (VR TMD EEG)

A study testing RelieVRx in people with Pain and Virtual Reality, run by University of Maryland, Baltimore at 2 sites in United States.

Recruiting

Looking for participants now. Contact the study team or a site below to ask about taking part.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This project examines, in chronic pain, the mechanisms of immersive virtual reality compared to the mechanisms of placebo hypoalgesia. The potential of developing new non-pharmacological premises for low-risk interventions for pain management is high. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 88 years
Conditions the study is for
Pain, Virtual Reality, Placebo
What is being tested?
RelieVRx
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
78 participants
Where
2 sitesUnited States
Study dates
9 Apr 2024to 30 Nov 2026
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 88 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Age (18-88 years)
  • English speaker (written and spoken)
  • Temporal Mandibular Disorder (TMD) for at least 3 months
  • TMD Grade Chronic Pain Scale (GCPS) ≥ 0

Who cannot join

  • Present or past degenerative neuromuscular disease
  • Cardiovascular, neurological diseases, pulmonary abnormalities, kidney disease, liver disease, history of cancer within past 3 years
  • Cervical pain (e.g. stenosis, radiculopathy)
  • Any personal (or family first degree) history of mania, schizophrenia, or other psychoses
  • Severe psychiatric condition (e.g. schizophrenia, bipolar disorders, autism) leading to hospitalization within the last 3 years.
  • Use of Antipsychotics (e.g., Risperdal, Ability and clozaril)Lifetime alcohol/drug dependence or alcohol/drug abuse in past 3 months
Show all 18Show fewer
  • Pregnancy or breast feeding
  • Color-blindness
  • Impaired or uncorrected hearing
  • Non-dominant hand
  • Any facial trauma that has occurred in the last 6 weeks
  • History of a severe facial trauma in the last 2-3 months
  • Conditions that would interfere with the VR mask placement (e.g. trauma, burn, infection)
  • Known history of severe motion sickness
  • Non-removable head cover, artificial hair, certain types of braids or dreadlocks
  • History of fainting
  • History of angioedema
  • Failed drug test (testing for opiates, cocaine, methamphetamines, and amphetamines)

Trial locations and contacts

2 sites in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Research Coordinator contact

410-706-5975

NRSCollocaLab@umaryland.edu

Katia Matychak, MS contact

410-706-5975

katiamatychak@umaryland.edu

United States2 sites, 2 recruiting
  • Luana Colloca

    Baltimore, Maryland, 21201-1512

    Luana Colloca, MD,PhD,MS, 3013648089, Colloca@umaryland.edu

    Recruiting
  • University of Maryland

    Baltimore, Maryland, 21201-1512

    Luana Colloca, MD, PhD, MS, 3013648089, colloca@umaryland.edu

    Katia Matychak, MS, 4107065975, asuhr@umaryland.edu

    Recruiting

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Neural Mechanisms of Immersive Virtual Reality in Chronic Pain

This project examines, in chronic pain, the mechanisms of immersive virtual reality compared to the mechanisms of placebo hypoalgesia. The potential of developing new non-pharmacological premises for low-risk interventions for pain management is high.

Read the detailed description

Virtual reality (VR) has been seen as an intervention for alleviating clinical chronic (and acute) pain. An approach to pain management utilizing VR presents opportunities for reducing pain and suffering by using immersive, aesthetic, and multisensory stimulation. Investigator will analyze the behavioral and neural mechanisms of active VR against sham VR as two methods that investigate descending pain modulation. Thus, the central hypothesis is that those who respond to placebos will likely respond to active VR. If VR-induced analgesia depends upon the release of endogenous opioids.

In this project, the investigators will determine the effects of VR at the neural and clinical levels directly for TMD participants, inviting participants from an existing Colloca Lab-based cohort phenotyped for diagnosis, grade, and low/high impact pain profiles and prospective TMD participants in collaboration with Johns Hopkins University. These participants have agreed to be recontacted for further research.

In this study, based on our PAF study and modulation of autonomic measurements via VR, we will determine the role of acute and 3-week VR intervention to help restore PAF oscillations to normal. PAF and autonomic measurements will be collected in TMD participants characterized by low/high-impact pain. All participants will go through Active VR, Sham VR and NH phases (3-week each) where participants will be monitored for changes in cortical excitability via PAF oscillations and clinical benefit via EMA.

Being tested
RelieVRx, Sham-VR, No-VR (natural history control)
Keywords
TMD volunteers, VR, Clinical Pain, Ecological Momentary Assessment
Medical subject headings
Pain, Temporomandibular Joint Disorders

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • RelieVRxDevice

    Also called Active-VR

    Participants will use RelieVRx daily for 20min/day for 3 weeks

  • Sham-VRDevice

    Participants will use Sham-VR, consisting of video, images, and sound in a head-mounted display but lack the "sense of presence" and immersive features of Active-VR (for example, scene changes with head movement). Participants will use the Sham-VR daily for 20min/day for 3 weeks

  • No-VR (natural history control)Other

    Participants will continue regular/usual care without any VR devices (goggles or audiovisual input)

Study groups in NCT06214923
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
High impact TMDOtherOther: TMD Phenotype TMD participants will be clinically phenotyped into two between-subject groups based on their score on the Graded Chronic Pain Scale (GCPS). This group will have a GCPS grade 2b, 3, and 4.
Receives: Device: RelieVRx; Device: Sham-VR; Other: No-VR (natural history control)
Low impact TMDOtherOther: TMD Phenotype TMD participants will be clinically phenotyped into two between-subject groups based on their score on the Graded Chronic Pain Scale (GCPS). This group will have a GCPS grade 0, 1, and 2a
Receives: Device: RelieVRx; Device: Sham-VR; Other: No-VR (natural history control)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Peak alpha frequency (PAF)

    EEG response PAF when participants are undergoing the in-person VR

    Measured: We will acquire 2-10 min of baseline EEG with open eyes and 2-10 min of EEG with closed eyes. This measurement will occur at each of the four in-person visit approximately every 3 weeks.

  2. Objective incremental Celsius changes in heat-pain tolerance

    Heat pain tolerance to incremental change in temperature will be obtained using a timer (minutes of tolerance)

    Measured: The heat incremental changes range from 30 sec to 2 min tolerance. This measurement will occur at each of the four in-person visit approximately every 3 weeks.

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Subjective VAS (Visual Analog Scale) scores for mood, situational anxiety, and pain intensity/unpleasantness

    Participants will take Ecological Momentary Assessment questionnaires. Minimum Value: 0 Maximum Value: 100 Score interpretation: 0=not at all, 100=most/strongest For example, anxiety on a scale of 0-100, 0=no anxiety, 100=the most anxious

    Measured: Daily during the 3-week condition timeframe

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted22 Jan 2024
  2. Study start9 Apr 2024
  3. Primary completion30 May 2026
  4. Study completion30 Nov 2026 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Basic science
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Crossover
Model description
This is a 2 (high- vs. low-impact pain) by 3 (3-week Active VR vs. 3-week Sham VR vs. 3-week NH) conditions mixed experimental design. TMD participants will be clinically phenotype into high-impact or low-impact pain groups according to Graded Chronic Pain Scale (GCPS). All participants will go through Active VR, Sham VR and NH phases (3-week each). There will be 4 in-person visits where participants will be monitored for changes in cortical excitability via PAF oscillations and clinical benefit via Ecological Momentary Assessments (EMA) during the 3-week conditions. Crossover Study Model was chosen because each participant will receive VR, Sham-VR, and No-VR in random order
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Participant
Enrolment
78 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06214923
Sponsor's protocol ID
HP-00095888 (VR TMD EEG)
Acronym
VR TMD EEG
Status last verified
Jul 2026
First submitted
18 Dec 2023
Last updated
7 Jul 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
Individual data sharing
No: At this time, there is neither intent nor plan to share IPD.

Publications

  • Honzel E, Murthi S, Brawn-Cinani B, Colloca G, Kier C, Varshney A, Colloca L. Virtual reality, music, and pain: developing the premise for an interdisciplinary approach to pain management. Pain. 2019 Sep;160(9):1909-1919. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001539. No abstract available.

    PubMed 30817437
  • Colloca L, Raghuraman N, Wang Y, Akintola T, Brawn-Cinani B, Colloca G, Kier C, Varshney A, Murthi S. Virtual reality: physiological and behavioral mechanisms to increase individual pain tolerance limits. Pain. 2020 Sep 1;161(9):2010-2021. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001900.

    PubMed 32345915
  • Amanzio M, Benedetti F. Neuropharmacological dissection of placebo analgesia: expectation-activated opioid systems versus conditioning-activated specific subsystems. J Neurosci. 1999 Jan 1;19(1):484-94. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.19-01-00484.1999.

    PubMed 9870976
  • Colloca L. The Placebo Effect in Pain Therapies. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 2019 Jan 6;59:191-211. doi: 10.1146/annurev-pharmtox-010818-021542. Epub 2018 Sep 14.

    PubMed 30216744

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing RelieVRx in people with Pain and Virtual Reality, run by University of Maryland, Baltimore at 2 sites in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 18 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 Jul 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 2 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Research Coordinator (410-706-5975, NRSCollocaLab@umaryland.edu), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Peak alpha frequency (PAF) (time frame: We will acquire 2-10 min of baseline EEG with open eyes and 2-10 min of EEG with closed eyes. This measurement will occur at each of the four in-person visit approximately every 3 weeks.). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06214923, which also lists 4 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 Jul 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in