AzTrials
AzTrials

Cancer PainNCT06188286

The Effect of Patient-Controlled TEAS vs Sham TEAS for Improve Quality of Life in Patients With Cancer Pain

A study testing Transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation in people with Cancer Pain, run by Yi Liang.

Not yet recruiting

Opening soon. The study is approved but enrolment has not started yet. Sites may already take enquiries.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The conduct of a pilot trial is of great significance as a means of assessing the feasibility and harmonization of the research and is a very necessary precursor to the better conduct of formal trials. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 75 years
Conditions the study is for
Cancer Pain
What is being tested?
Transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
94 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
25 Dec 2024to 30 Dec 2025
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 75 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Participants who had been diagnosed with cancer pain were eligible if they ①were 18 to 75 years old, ②had NRS pain score of ≥4 in the previous 1 week, or had regular use of analgesics, ③ anticipated survival of at least 6 months, ④ECOG-PS score ≤2 points, ⑤stable vital signs, clear consciousness, and the ability to correctly judge their pain, communication is unhindered, able to cooperate with researchers to complete relevant research assessments, ⑥voluntarily participate in this study and sign the informed consent form. Exclusion criteria included the following: ①Have venous thrombosis of the upper and lower limbs (below the elbow/knee joint), active cerebrovascular disease, severe cardiopulmonary dysfunction, or patient is clinically unstable (eg, acute infections, electrolyte disturbances).②Patients with pacemaker implantation or metal implantation in the body. ③People with local skin at acupoints lesions, poor skin conditions, or other people unsuitable for PC-TEAS treatment. ④Cancer patients who are planning to become pregnant recently or are pregnant. ⑤Have a psychiatric disorder or severe cognitive impairment who are unable to communicate. ⑥Participating in other clinical trials.

About this study

Official title: Patient-Controlled Transcutaneous Acupoint Electrical Stimulation to Improve Quality of Life in Patients With Cancer Pain

The conduct of a pilot trial is of great significance as a means of assessing the feasibility and harmonization of the research and is a very necessary precursor to the better conduct of formal trials. The primary aim of this pilot study is to assess the feasibility of a PC-TEAS in improving the quality of life of cancer patients with pain, with the aspiration of providing process evidence base and an assessment of the intervention for conducting a formal trial. the secondary outcome is to assess the clinical efficacy of the PC-TEAS.

Conditions
Cancer Pain
Being tested
Transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation, sham Transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation
Keywords
transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation
Medical subject headings
Cancer Pain

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulationOther

    The 4 patches of the transcutaneous acupoint electrical stimulator were pasted on two pairs of acupuncture points, the output frequency was adjusted to 2Hz, the intensity was up to 50ma, the single intervention time was 30 minutes, and another group of acupuncture points was replaced after completion, and the rest of the operations were the same as above, with a total intervention time of 1 hour.

  • sham Transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulationOther

    The patch is fixed on the acupuncture point to turn on the instrument, but there is no current output

Study groups in NCT06188286
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
TEASActive comparatortranscutaneous acupoint electrical stimulation was performed at the bilateral Hegu and Waiguan acupoints for 30 minutes, and then transcutaneous acupoint electrical stimulation was performed at the Sanyinjiao and Zusanli acupoints of the bilateral lower limbs for 30 minutes.
Receives: Other: Transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation
sham TEASPlacebo comparatorExcept for the transcutaneous acupoint electrical stimulator, which has no current output, the other operations are the same as TEAS group
Receives: Other: sham Transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Trial feasibility

    The feasibility of the proposed approach will be evaluated by the number who agreed to participate in the trial.

    Measured: week 4

Secondary outcomes (6)
  1. the changes of EORTC QLQ-C30 score from baseline

    EORTC QLQ-C30 is a specific scale for the quality of life of cancer patients and contains 30 questions. It encompasses three dimensions of assessment which are global quality of life assessment, function assessment (physical, role, emotional, cognitive, social), and symptom assessment (fatigue, nausea, vomiting, pain, dyspnea, sleep, appetite, constipation, diarrhea, and financial). Standardized scores with values ranging from 0 to 100. Higher scores in global quality of life and functioning are indicative of an improved quality of life, whereas higher scores in symptom are associated with poorer health outcomes.

    Measured: week 4, week 8, week 12

  2. the changes in BPI score of mean pain, severe Pain, least pain and current pain from baesline

    Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) scale is a commonly used scale for evaluating pain. Assess the patient's mean pain, severe pain, least pain score over the past week, and current level of pain. Scores range from 1-10, with higher scores indicating more severe pain.

    Measured: week 4, week 8, week 12

  3. the amounts of analgesics used

    Changes in Patient Medication Dosage Compared to Baseline.

    Measured: week 4, week 8, week 12

  4. Index of spontaneous bowel movements

    Spontaneous bowel movements (SBM) refer to bowel movements that have occurred within the past 24 hours without the use of laxatives.Record the number of spontaneous bowel movements of the subject in the past week. Bowel Function Index (BFI) in clinical practice. Specially used to evaluate constipation caused by opioid drugs, the subject's difficulty in defecation and feeling of incomplete defecation in the past week will be recorded. The overall satisfaction rating of defecation.

    Measured: week 4, week 8, week 12

  5. The changes in mood scale scores of Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D)

    HAM-D is a standardized scale for the measurement of the severity of depressive symptoms, initially designed to yield a total score based on 17 items. The scores of anxiety/depression and its change during the previous 2 weeks from baseline will be recorded.The total score > 24 points, severe depression. 17≤ score ≤24, moderate depression. 7≤ score ≤17, mild depression. < 7 points, no depressive symptoms.

    Measured: week 4, week 8, week 12

  6. The changes in mood scale scores of Hamilton Rating Scale for Hamilton Rating Scale for Anxiety (HAM-A)

    HAM-A is one of the most widely used rating scales to measure the severity of perceived anxiety symptoms. A total of 14 items were included 14 items. The total score ≥29 points, may be severe anxiety. ≥21 points, there must be obvious anxiety. ≥14 points, must have anxiety. ≥7 points, may have anxiety. < 7 points, no anxiety symptoms.

    Measured: week 4, week 8, week 12

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted3 Jan 2024
  2. Study start25 Dec 2024 (estimated)
  3. Primary completion31 Oct 2025 (estimated)
  4. Study completion30 Dec 2025 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
94 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06188286
Sponsor's protocol ID
0593
Status last verified
Dec 2024
First submitted
18 Dec 2023
Last updated
24 Dec 2024
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation in people with Cancer Pain, run by Yi Liang.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Dec 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Trial feasibility (time frame: week 4). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Dec 2024.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in