HIV TestingAEGIDANCT06150937
HST for Female Sex Workers/Drug Users in Kazakhstan
A study testing AEGIDA intervention arm in people with HIV Testing and Intention, run by City University of New York at 1 site in Kazakhstan.
Trial summary
The goal of this behavioral intervention clinical trial is to assess acceptability, feasibility, and preliminary efficacy of a 4-session intervention to increase consistent HIV testing and linkage to care and prevention among HIV uninfected (assessed via on-site testing) female sex workers who use drugs in Kazakhstan. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- HIV Testing, Intention
- What is being tested?
- AEGIDA intervention arm
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 90 participants
- Where
- 1 siteKazakhstan
- Study dates
- 15 Nov 2022to Aug 2024
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- Women only
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- report vaginal or anal intercourse in past year in exchange for money, alcohol, drugs, or other goods/resources
- report having injected or used drugs and/or binged alcohol in past year
- report at least one episode of condomless sexual intercourse in past 90 days with a paying, casual, or regular (intimate) sexual partner
- HIV-negative as confirmed by rapid test at enrollment
Who cannot join
- have a cognitive or psychiatric impairment preventing comprehension of study procedures as assessed during Informed Consent
- do not speak and understand Russian at a conversational level
- previously enrolled in the pre-pilot portion of the study
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: HIV Self-testing Intervention for Female Sex Workers Who Inject Drugs in Kazakhstan
The goal of this behavioral intervention clinical trial is to assess acceptability, feasibility, and preliminary efficacy of a 4-session intervention to increase consistent HIV testing and linkage to care and prevention among HIV uninfected (assessed via on-site testing) female sex workers who use drugs in Kazakhstan.
The main question it aims to answer are:
Read more
- is the intervention acceptable and feasible
- do participants randomized to the intervention arm report: 1) past 3-month testing; 2) frequent testing (2+ test over 6 mos.); 3) linkage to HIV care and ART initiation, if positive, or intention to uptake PrEP, if negative, as compared with control arm participants. Secondary outcomes include incident, biologically-confirmed STIs and stigma-related factors. Follow-up period is six months.
All participants will be HIV-negative upon study enrollment as assessed via rapid HIV test.
Participants randomized to the intervention arm will be engaged in a 4-session intervention that offers training and education in HIV self-testing, peer education on HIV self-testing, internalized stigma coping and resistance via basic cognitive restructuring, and provision of HIV self-test kits and reminders every three months. Researchers will compare participants randomized to the intervention arm to participants randomized to the time- and attention-control arm to evaluate impact of the intervention on the outcomes described above.
Read the detailed description
SPECIFIC AIMS This application seeks to transfer R34 DA049664, awarded previously to Research Foundation City University of New York (Contact MPI: Frye), to Columbia University where both the Contact and non-Contact MPI (El-Bassel) are based. The goal of this study is to assess acceptability, feasibility, and preliminary efficacy of an intervention to increase consistent HIV testing and linkage to care and prevention among female sex workers who inject drugs (FSWID) in Kazakhstan. Central Asia (CA) has one of the world's fastest growing HIV epidemics, increasing 30% since 20101. Key populations made up 95% of new infections in 2017, with 9% among female sex workers (FSW), 39% among people who inject drugs (PWID), and 28% among clients/sex partners of key populations. In Kazakhstan, new HIV infections doubled from 2010 to 2017 and AIDS-related deaths increased 32%. According to the Kazakh Scientific Center of Dermatology and Infectious Diseases (KSCDID), HIV prevalence is 9% among PWID and 2% among FSW, and incidence increased among both groups from 2016 to 2017. Overall, 79% of people living with HIV (PLWH) were status aware, 43% on antiretroviral therapy (ART), and 24% virally suppressed in 2017. FSW who inject drugs (FSWID) are at increased risk of HIV/STI infection and less likely to test/receive care. Prior research found that ~30% of FSWID are HIV-infected.
HIV testing is the point of entry to HIV care and prevention, including PrEP/PEP where available. Consistent testing and early diagnosis are essential to achieving global 90-90-90 targets (90% status aware; 90% on ART; 90% virally suppressed). HIV-related stigmas, including community, enacted/experienced, internalized/self- and anticipated, remain major barriers to HIV testing, care and prevention. FSWID in Kazakhstan experience dual stigma and bias from healthcare providers (HCPs) related to sex work and/or drug use. HIV self-testing (HST) is an acceptable, user-controlled tool that increases new case identification and, due to less contact with HCPs, reduces enacted and anticipated stigma. HST interventions for FSW in Africa increased status knowledge, recent testing and HST is WHO recommended for key populations although reading test results and suboptimal linkage to care are concerns. There is a tension between HST as a private, stigma-avoidant approach and linkage to care/prevention, which is face-to-face. Prior research suggests that FSW welcome HST, but that HCP bias inhibits linkage to care. As PrEP may become available for key populations in CA, interventions to leverage HST to locate new cases via consistent testing and facilitate ART and biomedical prevention linkage are needed. Presently, no such interventions are registered or have been evaluated for FSWID in CA. To address this gap, the study proposes to design and assess feasibility, acceptability and preliminary efficacy of a novel, theory-based intervention for FSWID that will combine core components from efficacious HST and linkage interventions with novel components to reduce self-stigma and improve anticipated stigma coping, as well as exploratory targets (e.g. HCP/community stigma, collective efficacy, PrEP awareness/intention, etc.) identified via formative research. Finally, the study will describe data required to calculate cost implications related to feasibility/sustainability. The study aims are:
Aim 1: Elicit preferences to inform adaptation of existing evidence-based HST components: training (peer vs. pro), distribution (network vs. site), support (in-person vs. text) and linkage (navigation, etc.). Elicit perspectives to inform design of novel linkage to care/biomedical prevention components. To achieve this aim, the following will occur: formative research (30 in-depth interviews; 4 focus groups [N=20]) to identify preferences around HST; and characterize barriers (e.g. HCP/community/anticipated stigma/self-stigma) to and facilitators of (e.g. self and collective efficacy, empowerment, peer support, PrEP awareness) linkage to care/prevention.
Aim 2. Design, component test (N=20) and pre-pilot (N=20) the 4-session intervention. Here, modified intervention adaptation and design will be used to combine core components of efficacious HST interventions for FSW with novel ones to address self-stigma and anticipated stigma coping, as well as advocacy and peer-based linkage facilitators, using stigma, advocacy, and empowerment theoretical approaches.
Aim 3. Aim 3. Assess feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of the intervention in increasing HIV testing and linkage to care (if positive) or biomedical uptake intention (if negative). To achieve this aim, the study will randomize 90 HIV-negative FSWID to a 4-session experimental arm or a time- and attention-controlled standard HIV test/risk reduction counseling arm and follow them for 6 months. Primary outcomes are: 1) past 3-month testing; 2) frequent testing (2+ test over 6 mos.); 3) linkage to HIV care and ART initiation, if positive; and 3) intention to uptake PrEP if negative. Secondary outcomes will include incident, biologically-confirmed STIs and stigma-related factors.
The pilot RCT will be conducted in partnership with Amelia, a non-profit, FSW advocacy organization, and KSCDID, which leads national HIV treatment/prevention strategy. The study builds on GHRCCA's decade-long success in designing and testing HIV behavior change interventions in Kazakhstan, significant regional research infrastructure, providing economies in execution. The results of this study, which is unique in linking HST with stigma-reduction approaches, will inform the submission of an R01 application and will have implications for research with FSW and PWID globally and in the United States.
- Conditions
- HIV Testing, Intention
- Being tested
- AEGIDA intervention arm, AEGIDA control arm
- Keywords
- Pre-exposure Prophylaxis, Post-exposure Prophylaxis, HIV self-testing
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
AEGIDA intervention armBehavioural
The intervention arm has 4 sessions facilitated one-on-one by trained staff and lasting ~40 minutes. The first session focuses on establishing rapport, assessing HIV risk, and educating/training participants on HIV self-testing/PEP/PrEP. The second session on peer education/training, barriers to and facilitators of testing, and supporting peers in receiving reactive and/or indeterminate HIV test results, as well as self-care. The third session on stigma and discrimination and techniques to cope with and resist stigma. The final session is a culminating one focused on reviewing key skills and health promotion planning conducted in first three sessions. The intervention arm applies anti-intersectional stigma, empowerment, and harm reduction approaches. All participants will receive/have access to HIV self-test kits every three months.
AEGIDA control armBehavioural
The control arm has 4 sessions via one-on-one facilitation by a trained facilitator and lasting ~40 minutes. It includes basic information on self-screening for common adverse health conditions among women in Kazakhstan, including STIs and HIV, as well as information on testing and risk reduction. All participants will receive/have access to HIV self-test kits every three months.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| AEGIDA intervention arm | Experimental | Four session behavioral intervention to promote consistent HIV testing, frequent HIV testing and intention to uptake PEP/PrEP. Receives: Behavioral: AEGIDA intervention arm |
| AEGIDA control arm | Active comparator | Four session didactic intervention to promote self-screening for common health problems, including HIV self-testing. Receives: Behavioral: AEGIDA control arm |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
HIV testing
HIV testing (operationalized as 1+ test in past 3 mos. over follow-up) When was the last time you were tested for HIV? (6M_HIV TEST LAST)
- In the past 3 months
- Not in the past 3 months, but in the past 6 months
- Not in the past 6 months, but in the past year
- Not in the past year, but in the past 3 years
- More than 3 years ago
- Refuse to answer
Measured: 6 months
Frequent HIV testing
frequent HIV testing (2+ test within 6 mos. over follow-up) In the last 3 months, how many times have you tested for HIV? (6M_HIV TEST TIMES) 0 (never)
- time
- times 3-4 times
5 or more times
Measured: 6 months
HIV care linkage/ART initiation
self-reported HIV care receipt and ART initiation For participant's who test positive, the study team engages in outreach and linkage to care, which is documented in the study file
Measured: 6 months
Intention to uptake PrEP
self-reported intention to use PrEP Have you heard of "PrEP" also known as pre exposure prophylaxis?
In the last three months, have you spoken to a health care provider about PrEP to reduce the risk of HIV infection?
In the last three months, have you taken PrEP to reduce the risk of HIV infection?
Are you currently taking PrEP (pre-exposure prophylaxis)?
Are you taking PrEP under a doctor or health care professional's supervision?
Are you planning to take PrEP (pre-exposure prophylaxis)?
Women who exchange sex and/or use drugs should take PrEP.
Based on what I know about PrEP, I would prefer (RANK the options):
Measured: 6 months
Secondary outcomes (2)
incident STI
incident, biologically-confirmed STIs
Measured: 12 months
stigma-related outcomes
self-reported internalized HIV stigma, sex worker stigma, drug user stigma
Smith LR, Earnshaw VA, Copenhaver MM, Cunningham CO. Substance use stigma: Reliability and validity of a theory-based scale for substance-using populations. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2016 May 1;162:34-43. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2016.02.019. Epub 2016 Feb 26. PMID: 26972790; PMCID: PMC5293183.
Kerrigan, D., Karver, T., Barrington, C., Davis, D. A., Donastorg, Y., Perez, M., . . . Chan, K. S.
(2021). Using Item Response Theory to Develop the Experiences of Sex Work Stigma Scale: Implications for the Reseaerch on the Social Determinants of HIV. AIDS Behavior.
With the new HIV medications, HIV infection is no longer a danger. (6M HIV KNOW MED). (G04) True False Don't know
Measured: 12 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted30 Nov 2023
- Study start15 Nov 2022
- Primary completion1 Apr 2024 (estimated)
- Study completionAug 2024 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for HIV TestingStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Pilot RCT of a 4-session intervention. Participants will be randomized in a 2:1 intervention to control ratio and followed up for 12 months.
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 90 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- City University of New York
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Columbia University
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Victoria Frye, City University of New York
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06150937
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- R34DA049664
- Acronym
- AEGIDA
- Status last verified
- Feb 2024
- First submitted
- 14 Nov 2023
- Last updated
- 5 Feb 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
West BS, Darisheva M, McCrimmon T, Chang M, Zholnerova N, Grigorchuk E, Starbird L, Terlikbayeva A, Primbetova S, Cordingley O, Baiserkin B, Kassymbekova S, Mussina Z, Rashidov I, Gilbert L, El-Bassel N, Frye V; AEGIDA Study Team; Key Community Partners. AEGIDA: Results of a Pilot Randomized Trial of an HIV Self-Testing Intervention for Women Who Exchange Sex and Use Substances in Kazakhstan. AIDS Behav. 2026 Mar;30(3):655-667. doi: 10.1007/s10461-025-04927-0. Epub 2025 Nov 3.
PubMed 41177842
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 5 Feb 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- HIV Self-testing Intervention for Female Sex Workers Who Inject Drugs in Kazakhstan
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06150937
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- AEGIDA / R34DA049664
- Conditions
- HIV Testing, Intention
- Keywords
- Pre-exposure Prophylaxis, Post-exposure Prophylaxis, HIV self-testing
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 90 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- City University of New YorkUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Columbia University
- Study start
- 15 Nov 2022 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Apr 2024 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Aug 2024 (estimated)
- First posted
- 30 Nov 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The goal of this behavioral intervention clinical trial is to assess acceptability, feasibility, and preliminary efficacy of a 4-session intervention to increase consistent HIV testing and linkage to care and prevention among HIV uninfected (assessed via on-site testing) female sex workers who use drugs in Kazakhstan.
The main question it aims to answer are:
- is the intervention acceptable and feasible
- do participants randomized to the intervention arm report: 1) past 3-month testing; 2) frequent testing (2+ test over 6 mos.); 3) linkage to HIV care and ART initiation, if positive, or intention to uptake PrEP, if negative, as compared with control arm participants. Secondary outcomes include incident, biologically-confirmed STIs and stigma-related factors. Follow-up period is six months.
All participants will be HIV-negative upon study enrollment as assessed via rapid HIV test.
Participants randomized to the intervention arm will be engaged in a 4-session intervention that offers training and education in HIV self-testing, peer education on HIV self-testing, internalized stigma coping and resistance via basic cognitive restructuring, and provision of HIV self-test kits and reminders every three months. Researchers will compare participants randomized to the intervention arm to participants randomized to the time- and attention-control arm to evaluate impact of the intervention on the outcomes described above.
Detailed description
SPECIFIC AIMS This application seeks to transfer R34 DA049664, awarded previously to Research Foundation City University of New York (Contact MPI: Frye), to Columbia University where both the Contact and non-Contact MPI (El-Bassel) are based. The goal of this study is to assess acceptability, feasibility, and preliminary efficacy of an intervention to increase consistent HIV testing and linkage to care and prevention among female sex workers who inject drugs (FSWID) in Kazakhstan. Central Asia (CA) has one of the world's fastest growing HIV epidemics, increasing 30% since 20101. Key populations made up 95% of new infections in 2017, with 9% among female sex workers (FSW), 39% among people who inject drugs (PWID), and 28% among clients/sex partners of key populations. In Kazakhstan, new HIV infections doubled from 2010 to 2017 and AIDS-related deaths increased 32%. According to the Kazakh Scientific Center of Dermatology and Infectious Diseases (KSCDID), HIV prevalence is 9% among PWID and 2% among FSW, and incidence increased among both groups from 2016 to 2017. Overall, 79% of people living with HIV (PLWH) were status aware, 43% on antiretroviral therapy (ART), and 24% virally suppressed in 2017. FSW who inject drugs (FSWID) are at increased risk of HIV/STI infection and less likely to test/receive care. Prior research found that ~30% of FSWID are HIV-infected.
HIV testing is the point of entry to HIV care and prevention, including PrEP/PEP where available. Consistent testing and early diagnosis are essential to achieving global 90-90-90 targets (90% status aware; 90% on ART; 90% virally suppressed). HIV-related stigmas, including community, enacted/experienced, internalized/self- and anticipated, remain major barriers to HIV testing, care and prevention. FSWID in Kazakhstan experience dual stigma and bias from healthcare providers (HCPs) related to sex work and/or drug use. HIV self-testing (HST) is an acceptable, user-controlled tool that increases new case identification and, due to less contact with HCPs, reduces enacted and anticipated stigma. HST interventions for FSW in Africa increased status knowledge, recent testing and HST is WHO recommended for key populations although reading test results and suboptimal linkage to care are concerns. There is a tension between HST as a private, stigma-avoidant approach and linkage to care/prevention, which is face-to-face. Prior research suggests that FSW welcome HST, but that HCP bias inhibits linkage to care. As PrEP may become available for key populations in CA, interventions to leverage HST to locate new cases via consistent testing and facilitate ART and biomedical prevention linkage are needed. Presently, no such interventions are registered or have been evaluated for FSWID in CA. To address this gap, the study proposes to design and assess feasibility, acceptability and preliminary efficacy of a novel, theory-based intervention for FSWID that will combine core components from efficacious HST and linkage interventions with novel components to reduce self-stigma and improve anticipated stigma coping, as well as exploratory targets (e.g. HCP/community stigma, collective efficacy, PrEP awareness/intention, etc.) identified via formative research. Finally, the study will describe data required to calculate cost implications related to feasibility/sustainability. The study aims are:
Aim 1: Elicit preferences to inform adaptation of existing evidence-based HST components: training (peer vs. pro), distribution (network vs. site), support (in-person vs. text) and linkage (navigation, etc.). Elicit perspectives to inform design of novel linkage to care/biomedical prevention components. To achieve this aim, the following will occur: formative research (30 in-depth interviews; 4 focus groups [N=20]) to identify preferences around HST; and characterize barriers (e.g. HCP/community/anticipated stigma/self-stigma) to and facilitators of (e.g. self and collective efficacy, empowerment, peer support, PrEP awareness) linkage to care/prevention.
Aim 2. Design, component test (N=20) and pre-pilot (N=20) the 4-session intervention. Here, modified intervention adaptation and design will be used to combine core components of efficacious HST interventions for FSW with novel ones to address self-stigma and anticipated stigma coping, as well as advocacy and peer-based linkage facilitators, using stigma, advocacy, and empowerment theoretical approaches.
Aim 3. Aim 3. Assess feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of the intervention in increasing HIV testing and linkage to care (if positive) or biomedical uptake intention (if negative). To achieve this aim, the study will randomize 90 HIV-negative FSWID to a 4-session experimental arm or a time- and attention-controlled standard HIV test/risk reduction counseling arm and follow them for 6 months. Primary outcomes are: 1) past 3-month testing; 2) frequent testing (2+ test over 6 mos.); 3) linkage to HIV care and ART initiation, if positive; and 3) intention to uptake PrEP if negative. Secondary outcomes will include incident, biologically-confirmed STIs and stigma-related factors.
The pilot RCT will be conducted in partnership with Amelia, a non-profit, FSW advocacy organization, and KSCDID, which leads national HIV treatment/prevention strategy. The study builds on GHRCCA's decade-long success in designing and testing HIV behavior change interventions in Kazakhstan, significant regional research infrastructure, providing economies in execution. The results of this study, which is unique in linking HST with stigma-reduction approaches, will inform the submission of an R01 application and will have implications for research with FSW and PWID globally and in the United States.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Pilot RCT of a 4-session intervention. Participants will be randomized in a 2:1 intervention to control ratio and followed up for 12 months.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| AEGIDA intervention arm | Experimental | Behavioral: AEGIDA intervention armFour session behavioral intervention to promote consistent HIV testing, frequent HIV testing and intention to uptake PEP/PrEP. |
| AEGIDA control arm | Active comparator | Behavioral: AEGIDA control armFour session didactic intervention to promote self-screening for common health problems, including HIV self-testing. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- report vaginal or anal intercourse in past year in exchange for money, alcohol, drugs, or other goods/resources
- report having injected or used drugs and/or binged alcohol in past year
- report at least one episode of condomless sexual intercourse in past 90 days with a paying, casual, or regular (intimate) sexual partner
- HIV-negative as confirmed by rapid test at enrollment
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- have a cognitive or psychiatric impairment preventing comprehension of study procedures as assessed during Informed Consent
- do not speak and understand Russian at a conversational level
- previously enrolled in the pre-pilot portion of the study
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| AEGIDA intervention armThe intervention arm has 4 sessions facilitated one-on-one by trained staff and lasting ~40 minutes. The first session focuses on establishing rapport, assessing HIV risk, and educating/training participants on HIV self-testing/PEP/PrEP. The second session on peer education/training, barriers to and facilitators of testing, and supporting peers in receiving reactive and/or indeterminate HIV test results, as well as self-care. The third session on stigma and discrimination and techniques to cope with and resist stigma. The final session is a culminating one focused on reviewing key skills and health promotion planning conducted in first three sessions. The intervention arm applies anti-intersectional stigma, empowerment, and harm reduction approaches. All participants will receive/have access to HIV self-test kits every three months. | Behavioural | AEGIDA intervention arm |
| AEGIDA control armThe control arm has 4 sessions via one-on-one facilitation by a trained facilitator and lasting ~40 minutes. It includes basic information on self-screening for common adverse health conditions among women in Kazakhstan, including STIs and HIV, as well as information on testing and risk reduction. All participants will receive/have access to HIV self-test kits every three months. | Behavioural | AEGIDA control arm |
Primary outcome
HIV testing
Time frame: 6 months
HIV testing (operationalized as 1+ test in past 3 mos. over follow-up) When was the last time you were tested for HIV? (6M_HIV TEST LAST) 1. In the past 3 months 2. Not in the past 3 months, but in the past 6 months 3. Not in the past 6 months, but in the past year 4. Not in the past year, but in the past 3 years 5. More than 3 years ago 99. Refuse to answer
Frequent HIV testing
Time frame: 6 months
frequent HIV testing (2+ test within 6 mos. over follow-up) In the last 3 months, how many times have you tested for HIV? (6M_HIV TEST TIMES) 0 (never) 1. time 2. times 3-4 times 5 or more times
HIV care linkage/ART initiation
Time frame: 6 months
self-reported HIV care receipt and ART initiation For participant's who test positive, the study team engages in outreach and linkage to care, which is documented in the study file
Intention to uptake PrEP
Time frame: 6 months
self-reported intention to use PrEP Have you heard of "PrEP" also known as pre exposure prophylaxis? In the last three months, have you spoken to a health care provider about PrEP to reduce the risk of HIV infection? In the last three months, have you taken PrEP to reduce the risk of HIV infection? Are you currently taking PrEP (pre-exposure prophylaxis)? Are you taking PrEP under a doctor or health care professional's supervision? Are you planning to take PrEP (pre-exposure prophylaxis)? Women who exchange sex and/or use drugs should take PrEP. Based on what I know about PrEP, I would prefer (RANK the options):
2 secondary outcomes
incident STI
Time frame: 12 months
stigma-related outcomes
Time frame: 12 months
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 5 Feb 2024.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 41177842West BS, Darisheva M, McCrimmon T, Chang M, Zholnerova N, Grigorchuk E, Starbird L, Terlikbayeva A, Primbetova S, Cordingley O, Baiserkin B, Kassymbekova S, Mussina Z, Rashidov I, Gilbert L, El-Bassel N, Frye V; AEGIDA Study Team; Key Community Partners. AEGIDA: Results of a Pilot Randomized Trial of an HIV Self-Testing Intervention for Women Who Exchange Sex and Use Substances in Kazakhstan. AIDS Behav. 2026 Mar;30(3):655-667. doi: 10.1007/s10461-025-04927-0. Epub 2025 Nov 3.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for HIV Testing
Not yet recruiting
HealthMpowerment Korea: Pilot Testing the Cultural Adaptation of a Digital HIV Intervention for Men Who Have Sex With Men in South Korea
HIV Infections, HIV Prevention and Care
Not yet recruiting
HIV/STI/HCV Testing and Overdose Prevention Among Survivors of Sex Trafficking
HIV Testing, STI
Recruiting
A Study to Evaluate the Performance, and Usability of TruPlex HIV/HepB/Syphilis Rapid Test
HIV1 Infection, HIV 2 Infection
Enrolling by invitation
Intervention to Reduce HIV Related Stigma Among Pregnant and Postpartum Women
HIV, HIV - Human Immunodeficiency Virus
Active, not recruiting
Evaluating the Effectiveness of a Mobile HIV Prevention App to Increase HIV and Sexually Transmitted Infections (STI) Testing and PrEP Initiation Among Rural Men Who Have Sex With Men
HIV Infections, STI
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing AEGIDA intervention arm in people with HIV Testing and Intention, run by City University of New York at 1 site in Kazakhstan.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Feb 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Kazakhstan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
HIV testing (time frame: 6 months). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06150937, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Feb 2024.