AzTrials
AzTrials

HIV TestingAEGIDANCT06150937

HST for Female Sex Workers/Drug Users in Kazakhstan

A study testing AEGIDA intervention arm in people with HIV Testing and Intention, run by City University of New York at 1 site in Kazakhstan.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The goal of this behavioral intervention clinical trial is to assess acceptability, feasibility, and preliminary efficacy of a 4-session intervention to increase consistent HIV testing and linkage to care and prevention among HIV uninfected (assessed via on-site testing) female sex workers who use drugs in Kazakhstan. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
HIV Testing, Intention
What is being tested?
AEGIDA intervention arm
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
90 participants
Where
1 siteKazakhstan
Study dates
15 Nov 2022to Aug 2024
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • Women only
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • report vaginal or anal intercourse in past year in exchange for money, alcohol, drugs, or other goods/resources
  • report having injected or used drugs and/or binged alcohol in past year
  • report at least one episode of condomless sexual intercourse in past 90 days with a paying, casual, or regular (intimate) sexual partner
  • HIV-negative as confirmed by rapid test at enrollment

Who cannot join

  • have a cognitive or psychiatric impairment preventing comprehension of study procedures as assessed during Informed Consent
  • do not speak and understand Russian at a conversational level
  • previously enrolled in the pre-pilot portion of the study

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Kazakhstan1 site
  • Global Health Research Center of Central Asia

    Almaty

Other trials in Kazakhstan

About this study

Official title: HIV Self-testing Intervention for Female Sex Workers Who Inject Drugs in Kazakhstan

The goal of this behavioral intervention clinical trial is to assess acceptability, feasibility, and preliminary efficacy of a 4-session intervention to increase consistent HIV testing and linkage to care and prevention among HIV uninfected (assessed via on-site testing) female sex workers who use drugs in Kazakhstan.

The main question it aims to answer are:

Read more
  1. is the intervention acceptable and feasible
  2. do participants randomized to the intervention arm report: 1) past 3-month testing; 2) frequent testing (2+ test over 6 mos.); 3) linkage to HIV care and ART initiation, if positive, or intention to uptake PrEP, if negative, as compared with control arm participants. Secondary outcomes include incident, biologically-confirmed STIs and stigma-related factors. Follow-up period is six months.

All participants will be HIV-negative upon study enrollment as assessed via rapid HIV test.

Participants randomized to the intervention arm will be engaged in a 4-session intervention that offers training and education in HIV self-testing, peer education on HIV self-testing, internalized stigma coping and resistance via basic cognitive restructuring, and provision of HIV self-test kits and reminders every three months. Researchers will compare participants randomized to the intervention arm to participants randomized to the time- and attention-control arm to evaluate impact of the intervention on the outcomes described above.

Read the detailed description

SPECIFIC AIMS This application seeks to transfer R34 DA049664, awarded previously to Research Foundation City University of New York (Contact MPI: Frye), to Columbia University where both the Contact and non-Contact MPI (El-Bassel) are based. The goal of this study is to assess acceptability, feasibility, and preliminary efficacy of an intervention to increase consistent HIV testing and linkage to care and prevention among female sex workers who inject drugs (FSWID) in Kazakhstan. Central Asia (CA) has one of the world's fastest growing HIV epidemics, increasing 30% since 20101. Key populations made up 95% of new infections in 2017, with 9% among female sex workers (FSW), 39% among people who inject drugs (PWID), and 28% among clients/sex partners of key populations. In Kazakhstan, new HIV infections doubled from 2010 to 2017 and AIDS-related deaths increased 32%. According to the Kazakh Scientific Center of Dermatology and Infectious Diseases (KSCDID), HIV prevalence is 9% among PWID and 2% among FSW, and incidence increased among both groups from 2016 to 2017. Overall, 79% of people living with HIV (PLWH) were status aware, 43% on antiretroviral therapy (ART), and 24% virally suppressed in 2017. FSW who inject drugs (FSWID) are at increased risk of HIV/STI infection and less likely to test/receive care. Prior research found that ~30% of FSWID are HIV-infected.

HIV testing is the point of entry to HIV care and prevention, including PrEP/PEP where available. Consistent testing and early diagnosis are essential to achieving global 90-90-90 targets (90% status aware; 90% on ART; 90% virally suppressed). HIV-related stigmas, including community, enacted/experienced, internalized/self- and anticipated, remain major barriers to HIV testing, care and prevention. FSWID in Kazakhstan experience dual stigma and bias from healthcare providers (HCPs) related to sex work and/or drug use. HIV self-testing (HST) is an acceptable, user-controlled tool that increases new case identification and, due to less contact with HCPs, reduces enacted and anticipated stigma. HST interventions for FSW in Africa increased status knowledge, recent testing and HST is WHO recommended for key populations although reading test results and suboptimal linkage to care are concerns. There is a tension between HST as a private, stigma-avoidant approach and linkage to care/prevention, which is face-to-face. Prior research suggests that FSW welcome HST, but that HCP bias inhibits linkage to care. As PrEP may become available for key populations in CA, interventions to leverage HST to locate new cases via consistent testing and facilitate ART and biomedical prevention linkage are needed. Presently, no such interventions are registered or have been evaluated for FSWID in CA. To address this gap, the study proposes to design and assess feasibility, acceptability and preliminary efficacy of a novel, theory-based intervention for FSWID that will combine core components from efficacious HST and linkage interventions with novel components to reduce self-stigma and improve anticipated stigma coping, as well as exploratory targets (e.g. HCP/community stigma, collective efficacy, PrEP awareness/intention, etc.) identified via formative research. Finally, the study will describe data required to calculate cost implications related to feasibility/sustainability. The study aims are:

Aim 1: Elicit preferences to inform adaptation of existing evidence-based HST components: training (peer vs. pro), distribution (network vs. site), support (in-person vs. text) and linkage (navigation, etc.). Elicit perspectives to inform design of novel linkage to care/biomedical prevention components. To achieve this aim, the following will occur: formative research (30 in-depth interviews; 4 focus groups [N=20]) to identify preferences around HST; and characterize barriers (e.g. HCP/community/anticipated stigma/self-stigma) to and facilitators of (e.g. self and collective efficacy, empowerment, peer support, PrEP awareness) linkage to care/prevention.

Aim 2. Design, component test (N=20) and pre-pilot (N=20) the 4-session intervention. Here, modified intervention adaptation and design will be used to combine core components of efficacious HST interventions for FSW with novel ones to address self-stigma and anticipated stigma coping, as well as advocacy and peer-based linkage facilitators, using stigma, advocacy, and empowerment theoretical approaches.

Aim 3. Aim 3. Assess feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of the intervention in increasing HIV testing and linkage to care (if positive) or biomedical uptake intention (if negative). To achieve this aim, the study will randomize 90 HIV-negative FSWID to a 4-session experimental arm or a time- and attention-controlled standard HIV test/risk reduction counseling arm and follow them for 6 months. Primary outcomes are: 1) past 3-month testing; 2) frequent testing (2+ test over 6 mos.); 3) linkage to HIV care and ART initiation, if positive; and 3) intention to uptake PrEP if negative. Secondary outcomes will include incident, biologically-confirmed STIs and stigma-related factors.

The pilot RCT will be conducted in partnership with Amelia, a non-profit, FSW advocacy organization, and KSCDID, which leads national HIV treatment/prevention strategy. The study builds on GHRCCA's decade-long success in designing and testing HIV behavior change interventions in Kazakhstan, significant regional research infrastructure, providing economies in execution. The results of this study, which is unique in linking HST with stigma-reduction approaches, will inform the submission of an R01 application and will have implications for research with FSW and PWID globally and in the United States.

Being tested
AEGIDA intervention arm, AEGIDA control arm
Keywords
Pre-exposure Prophylaxis, Post-exposure Prophylaxis, HIV self-testing

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • AEGIDA intervention armBehavioural

    The intervention arm has 4 sessions facilitated one-on-one by trained staff and lasting ~40 minutes. The first session focuses on establishing rapport, assessing HIV risk, and educating/training participants on HIV self-testing/PEP/PrEP. The second session on peer education/training, barriers to and facilitators of testing, and supporting peers in receiving reactive and/or indeterminate HIV test results, as well as self-care. The third session on stigma and discrimination and techniques to cope with and resist stigma. The final session is a culminating one focused on reviewing key skills and health promotion planning conducted in first three sessions. The intervention arm applies anti-intersectional stigma, empowerment, and harm reduction approaches. All participants will receive/have access to HIV self-test kits every three months.

  • AEGIDA control armBehavioural

    The control arm has 4 sessions via one-on-one facilitation by a trained facilitator and lasting ~40 minutes. It includes basic information on self-screening for common adverse health conditions among women in Kazakhstan, including STIs and HIV, as well as information on testing and risk reduction. All participants will receive/have access to HIV self-test kits every three months.

Study groups in NCT06150937
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
AEGIDA intervention armExperimentalFour session behavioral intervention to promote consistent HIV testing, frequent HIV testing and intention to uptake PEP/PrEP.
Receives: Behavioral: AEGIDA intervention arm
AEGIDA control armActive comparatorFour session didactic intervention to promote self-screening for common health problems, including HIV self-testing.
Receives: Behavioral: AEGIDA control arm

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. HIV testing

    HIV testing (operationalized as 1+ test in past 3 mos. over follow-up) When was the last time you were tested for HIV? (6M_HIV TEST LAST)

    1. In the past 3 months
    2. Not in the past 3 months, but in the past 6 months
    3. Not in the past 6 months, but in the past year
    4. Not in the past year, but in the past 3 years
    5. More than 3 years ago
    6. Refuse to answer

    Measured: 6 months

  2. Frequent HIV testing

    frequent HIV testing (2+ test within 6 mos. over follow-up) In the last 3 months, how many times have you tested for HIV? (6M_HIV TEST TIMES) 0 (never)

    1. time
    2. times 3-4 times

    5 or more times

    Measured: 6 months

  3. HIV care linkage/ART initiation

    self-reported HIV care receipt and ART initiation For participant's who test positive, the study team engages in outreach and linkage to care, which is documented in the study file

    Measured: 6 months

  4. Intention to uptake PrEP

    self-reported intention to use PrEP Have you heard of "PrEP" also known as pre exposure prophylaxis?

    In the last three months, have you spoken to a health care provider about PrEP to reduce the risk of HIV infection?

    In the last three months, have you taken PrEP to reduce the risk of HIV infection?

    Are you currently taking PrEP (pre-exposure prophylaxis)?

    Are you taking PrEP under a doctor or health care professional's supervision?

    Are you planning to take PrEP (pre-exposure prophylaxis)?

    Women who exchange sex and/or use drugs should take PrEP.

    Based on what I know about PrEP, I would prefer (RANK the options):

    Measured: 6 months

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. incident STI

    incident, biologically-confirmed STIs

    Measured: 12 months

  2. stigma-related outcomes

    self-reported internalized HIV stigma, sex worker stigma, drug user stigma

    Smith LR, Earnshaw VA, Copenhaver MM, Cunningham CO. Substance use stigma: Reliability and validity of a theory-based scale for substance-using populations. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2016 May 1;162:34-43. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2016.02.019. Epub 2016 Feb 26. PMID: 26972790; PMCID: PMC5293183.

    Kerrigan, D., Karver, T., Barrington, C., Davis, D. A., Donastorg, Y., Perez, M., . . . Chan, K. S.

    (2021). Using Item Response Theory to Develop the Experiences of Sex Work Stigma Scale: Implications for the Reseaerch on the Social Determinants of HIV. AIDS Behavior.

    With the new HIV medications, HIV infection is no longer a danger. (6M HIV KNOW MED). (G04) True False Don't know

    Measured: 12 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted30 Nov 2023
  2. Study start15 Nov 2022
  3. Primary completion1 Apr 2024 (estimated)
  4. Study completionAug 2024 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Pilot RCT of a 4-session intervention. Participants will be randomized in a 2:1 intervention to control ratio and followed up for 12 months.
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
90 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06150937
Sponsor's protocol ID
R34DA049664
Acronym
AEGIDA
Status last verified
Feb 2024
First submitted
14 Nov 2023
Last updated
5 Feb 2024
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • West BS, Darisheva M, McCrimmon T, Chang M, Zholnerova N, Grigorchuk E, Starbird L, Terlikbayeva A, Primbetova S, Cordingley O, Baiserkin B, Kassymbekova S, Mussina Z, Rashidov I, Gilbert L, El-Bassel N, Frye V; AEGIDA Study Team; Key Community Partners. AEGIDA: Results of a Pilot Randomized Trial of an HIV Self-Testing Intervention for Women Who Exchange Sex and Use Substances in Kazakhstan. AIDS Behav. 2026 Mar;30(3):655-667. doi: 10.1007/s10461-025-04927-0. Epub 2025 Nov 3.

    PubMed 41177842

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing AEGIDA intervention arm in people with HIV Testing and Intention, run by City University of New York at 1 site in Kazakhstan.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Feb 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Kazakhstan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

HIV testing (time frame: 6 months). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06150937, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Feb 2024.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in