Low Pressure HydrocephalusNCT06129565
The Use of Q-Collar to Increase CSF Drainage in Low-pressure Hydrocephalus Patients
A study testing Q-collar in people with Low Pressure Hydrocephalus, run by University of Kansas Medical Center.
Trial summary
The investigators hypothesize that the Q-collar compression on bilateral internal jugular veins of patients with low pressure hydrocephalus will decrease venous drainage from the intracranial space, therefore increasing intracranial volume, decreasing brain compliance, and increasing CSF drainage through the shunt. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Low Pressure Hydrocephalus
- What is being tested?
- Q-collar
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 0 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- Dec 2024to Dec 2025
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- adult with low-pressure hydrocephalus, able to cranial imaging, able to provide consent or have surrogate decision maker that is able to provide it for them
Who cannot join
- pediatric patients, patients that can't consent or don't have a surrogate decision maker, patients that can't get cranial imaging
About this study
The investigators hypothesize that the Q-collar compression on bilateral internal jugular veins of patients with low pressure hydrocephalus will decrease venous drainage from the intracranial space, therefore increasing intracranial volume, decreasing brain compliance, and increasing CSF drainage through the shunt. This should improve persistent hydrocephalus symptoms and demonstrate improved ventricular drainage on imaging with decompressed ventricles.
Read the detailed description
Low-pressure hydrocephalus is an entity that is rare and difficult to manage. At this institution, Dr. Paul Camarata uses a method of "neck-wrapping" in those low-pressure hydrocephalus patients that were admitted for complications with their shunt, hypothesized to decrease venous outflow from the intracranial space, increase venous pressure within the cranium and therefore increase the turgor in the brain tissue allowing for CSF to more easily be pushed out of the ventricular space and through the drain. This would relieve the hydrocephalus symptoms and reduce ventricular size on imaging. The advent of the Q-collar for reducing TBI in contact sports functions in a similar way to the "neck-wrapping" used at this institution, but via the simplified tool of the collar. It functions by compressing the internal jugular veins bilaterally to increase intracranial volume and prevent "brain slosh" that can occur in contact sports that leads to brain injury. The collar in contrast to the neck wrap occupies a smaller surface area, which the investigators hypothesize will reduce the discomfort that is commonly associated with neck wrap. Furthermore, applying this Q-collar to low pressure hydrocephalus patients that struggle with symptom management while inpatient, the investigators hypothesize that CSF drainage will improve with wearing the collar via increased intracranial volume and lower brain compliance, therefore improving persistent hydrocephalus symptoms that are limiting on patient quality of life.
- Conditions
- Low Pressure Hydrocephalus
- Being tested
- Q-collar
- Medical subject headings
- Hydrocephalus, Normal Pressure
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Q-collarDevice
Q-collar is placed for all patients that are admitted with low-pressure hydrocephalus
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Q-collar Intervention | Experimental | All patients with low-pressure hydrocephalus that qualify for the study and agree to participate will receive the Q-collar for intervention Receives: Device: Q-collar |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Ventricular drainage
Amount of ventricular drainage with Q collar treatment
Measured: within 4-6 weeks
Ventricular size
change in ventricular size with Q collar treatment
Measured: within 4-6 weeks
Secondary outcomes (1)
Change in low-pressure hydrocephalus symptoms
Patients surveyed daily regarding low-pressure hydrocephalus symptoms including headache, altered mental status, blurry vision, other. Will document if worse, unchanged, or improved.
Measured: 4-6 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted13 Nov 2023
- Study startDec 2024 (estimated)
- Primary completionDec 2025 (estimated)
- Study completionDec 2025 (estimated)
Why it stopped: Participants not enrolled due to interest in the project
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (9)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Low Pressure HydrocephalusStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of Kansas Medical CenterThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 0 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Kansas Medical Center
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06129565
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- UKansasQcollarLPH
- Status last verified
- Jul 2025
- First submitted
- 3 Oct 2023
- Last updated
- 8 Jul 2025
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Smith DW, Bailes JE, Fisher JA, Robles J, Turner RC, Mills JD. Internal jugular vein compression mitigates traumatic axonal injury in a rat model by reducing the intracranial slosh effect. Neurosurgery. 2012 Mar;70(3):740-6. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e318235b991.
PubMed 21904255Turner RC, Naser ZJ, Bailes JE, Smith DW, Fisher JA, Rosen CL. Effect of slosh mitigation on histologic markers of traumatic brain injury: laboratory investigation. J Neurosurg. 2012 Dec;117(6):1110-8. doi: 10.3171/2012.8.JNS12358. Epub 2012 Sep 21.
PubMed 22998060Sindelar B, Bailes J, Sherman S, Finan J, Stone J, Lee J, Ahmadian S, Zhou Y, Patel V, Smith D. Effect of Internal Jugular Vein Compression on Intracranial Hemorrhage in a Porcine Controlled Cortical Impact Model. J Neurotrauma. 2017 Apr 15;34(8):1703-1709. doi: 10.1089/neu.2016.4648. Epub 2016 Dec 16.
PubMed 27573472Mannix R, Morriss NJ, Conley GM, Meehan WP 3rd, Nedder A, Qiu J, Float J, DiCesare CA, Myer GD. Internal Jugular Vein Compression Collar Mitigates Histopathological Alterations after Closed Head Rotational Head Impact in Swine: A Pilot Study. Neuroscience. 2020 Jun 15;437:132-144. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2020.04.009. Epub 2020 Apr 10.
PubMed 32283181Myer GD, Yuan W, Barber Foss KD, Thomas S, Smith D, Leach J, Kiefer AW, Dicesare C, Adams J, Gubanich PJ, Kitchen K, Schneider DK, Braswell D, Krueger D, Altaye M. Analysis of head impact exposure and brain microstructure response in a season-long application of a jugular vein compression collar: a prospective, neuroimaging investigation in American football. Br J Sports Med. 2016 Oct;50(20):1276-1285. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2016-096134. Epub 2016 Jun 15.
PubMed 27307271Myer GD, Yuan W, Barber Foss KD, Smith D, Altaye M, Reches A, Leach J, Kiefer AW, Khoury JC, Weiss M, Thomas S, Dicesare C, Adams J, Gubanich PJ, Geva A, Clark JF, Meehan WP 3rd, Mihalik JP, Krueger D. The Effects of External Jugular Compression Applied during Head Impact Exposure on Longitudinal Changes in Brain Neuroanatomical and Neurophysiological Biomarkers: A Preliminary Investigation. Front Neurol. 2016 Jun 6;7:74. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2016.00074. eCollection 2016.
PubMed 27375546Dinsmore M, Hajat Z, Brenna CT, Fisher J, Venkatraghavan L. Effect of a neck collar on brain turgor: a potential role in preventing concussions? Br J Sports Med. 2022 Jun;56(11):605-607. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2021-103961. Epub 2021 Nov 25.
PubMed 34824061Filippidis AS, Kalani MY, Nakaji P, Rekate HL. Negative-pressure and low-pressure hydrocephalus: the role of cerebrospinal fluid leaks resulting from surgical approaches to the cranial base. J Neurosurg. 2011 Nov;115(5):1031-7. doi: 10.3171/2011.6.JNS101504. Epub 2011 Jul 29.
PubMed 21800965Strand A, Balise S, Leung LJ, Durham S. Low-Pressure Hydrocephalus: A Case Report and Review of the Literature. World Neurosurg. 2018 Jan;109:e131-e135. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.09.120. Epub 2017 Sep 28.
PubMed 28962963
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 8 Jul 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Use of Q-Collar to Increase CSF Drainage in Low-pressure Hydrocephalus Patients
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06129565
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- UKansasQcollarLPH
- Conditions
- Low Pressure Hydrocephalus
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- WithdrawnReason stopped: Participants not enrolled due to interest in the project
- Enrolment
- 0 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of Kansas Medical CenterUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Dec 2024 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- Dec 2025 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Dec 2025 (estimated)
- First posted
- 13 Nov 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The investigators hypothesize that the Q-collar compression on bilateral internal jugular veins of patients with low pressure hydrocephalus will decrease venous drainage from the intracranial space, therefore increasing intracranial volume, decreasing brain compliance, and increasing CSF drainage through the shunt. This should improve persistent hydrocephalus symptoms and demonstrate improved ventricular drainage on imaging with decompressed ventricles.
Detailed description
Low-pressure hydrocephalus is an entity that is rare and difficult to manage. At this institution, Dr. Paul Camarata uses a method of "neck-wrapping" in those low-pressure hydrocephalus patients that were admitted for complications with their shunt, hypothesized to decrease venous outflow from the intracranial space, increase venous pressure within the cranium and therefore increase the turgor in the brain tissue allowing for CSF to more easily be pushed out of the ventricular space and through the drain. This would relieve the hydrocephalus symptoms and reduce ventricular size on imaging. The advent of the Q-collar for reducing TBI in contact sports functions in a similar way to the "neck-wrapping" used at this institution, but via the simplified tool of the collar. It functions by compressing the internal jugular veins bilaterally to increase intracranial volume and prevent "brain slosh" that can occur in contact sports that leads to brain injury. The collar in contrast to the neck wrap occupies a smaller surface area, which the investigators hypothesize will reduce the discomfort that is commonly associated with neck wrap. Furthermore, applying this Q-collar to low pressure hydrocephalus patients that struggle with symptom management while inpatient, the investigators hypothesize that CSF drainage will improve with wearing the collar via increased intracranial volume and lower brain compliance, therefore improving persistent hydrocephalus symptoms that are limiting on patient quality of life.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Q-collar Intervention | Experimental | Device: Q-collarAll patients with low-pressure hydrocephalus that qualify for the study and agree to participate will receive the Q-collar for intervention |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- adult with low-pressure hydrocephalus, able to cranial imaging, able to provide consent or have surrogate decision maker that is able to provide it for them
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- pediatric patients, patients that can't consent or don't have a surrogate decision maker, patients that can't get cranial imaging
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Q-collarQ-collar is placed for all patients that are admitted with low-pressure hydrocephalus | Device | Q-collar Intervention |
Primary outcome
Ventricular drainage
Time frame: within 4-6 weeks
Amount of ventricular drainage with Q collar treatment
Ventricular size
Time frame: within 4-6 weeks
change in ventricular size with Q collar treatment
1 secondary outcome
Change in low-pressure hydrocephalus symptoms
Time frame: 4-6 weeks
Results and safety
The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 8 Jul 2025.
- Background: PubMed 21904255Smith DW, Bailes JE, Fisher JA, Robles J, Turner RC, Mills JD. Internal jugular vein compression mitigates traumatic axonal injury in a rat model by reducing the intracranial slosh effect. Neurosurgery. 2012 Mar;70(3):740-6. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e318235b991.
- Background: PubMed 22998060Turner RC, Naser ZJ, Bailes JE, Smith DW, Fisher JA, Rosen CL. Effect of slosh mitigation on histologic markers of traumatic brain injury: laboratory investigation. J Neurosurg. 2012 Dec;117(6):1110-8. doi: 10.3171/2012.8.JNS12358. Epub 2012 Sep 21.
- Background: PubMed 27573472Sindelar B, Bailes J, Sherman S, Finan J, Stone J, Lee J, Ahmadian S, Zhou Y, Patel V, Smith D. Effect of Internal Jugular Vein Compression on Intracranial Hemorrhage in a Porcine Controlled Cortical Impact Model. J Neurotrauma. 2017 Apr 15;34(8):1703-1709. doi: 10.1089/neu.2016.4648. Epub 2016 Dec 16.
- Background: PubMed 32283181Mannix R, Morriss NJ, Conley GM, Meehan WP 3rd, Nedder A, Qiu J, Float J, DiCesare CA, Myer GD. Internal Jugular Vein Compression Collar Mitigates Histopathological Alterations after Closed Head Rotational Head Impact in Swine: A Pilot Study. Neuroscience. 2020 Jun 15;437:132-144. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2020.04.009. Epub 2020 Apr 10.
- Background: PubMed 27307271Myer GD, Yuan W, Barber Foss KD, Thomas S, Smith D, Leach J, Kiefer AW, Dicesare C, Adams J, Gubanich PJ, Kitchen K, Schneider DK, Braswell D, Krueger D, Altaye M. Analysis of head impact exposure and brain microstructure response in a season-long application of a jugular vein compression collar: a prospective, neuroimaging investigation in American football. Br J Sports Med. 2016 Oct;50(20):1276-1285. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2016-096134. Epub 2016 Jun 15.
- Background: PubMed 27375546Myer GD, Yuan W, Barber Foss KD, Smith D, Altaye M, Reches A, Leach J, Kiefer AW, Khoury JC, Weiss M, Thomas S, Dicesare C, Adams J, Gubanich PJ, Geva A, Clark JF, Meehan WP 3rd, Mihalik JP, Krueger D. The Effects of External Jugular Compression Applied during Head Impact Exposure on Longitudinal Changes in Brain Neuroanatomical and Neurophysiological Biomarkers: A Preliminary Investigation. Front Neurol. 2016 Jun 6;7:74. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2016.00074. eCollection 2016.
- Background: PubMed 34824061Dinsmore M, Hajat Z, Brenna CT, Fisher J, Venkatraghavan L. Effect of a neck collar on brain turgor: a potential role in preventing concussions? Br J Sports Med. 2022 Jun;56(11):605-607. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2021-103961. Epub 2021 Nov 25.
- Background: PubMed 21800965Filippidis AS, Kalani MY, Nakaji P, Rekate HL. Negative-pressure and low-pressure hydrocephalus: the role of cerebrospinal fluid leaks resulting from surgical approaches to the cranial base. J Neurosurg. 2011 Nov;115(5):1031-7. doi: 10.3171/2011.6.JNS101504. Epub 2011 Jul 29.
- Background: PubMed 28962963Strand A, Balise S, Leung LJ, Durham S. Low-Pressure Hydrocephalus: A Case Report and Review of the Literature. World Neurosurg. 2018 Jan;109:e131-e135. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.09.120. Epub 2017 Sep 28.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Low Pressure Hydrocephalus
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Prediction of Response to Shunt Surgery in Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus Using Radscale and Lumbar Puncture
Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus, Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus
Recruiting
Analysis of Cerebrospinal Fluid Dynamics in Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus
Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus
Active, not recruiting
Evaluation of the Safety and Effectiveness of the CereVasc® eShunt® System in Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus
Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus
Recruiting
Examining the Feasibility of Using Pressure Gradient Regulated Automated Cerebral Spinal Fluid Drainage During External Lumbar Drain Trials
NPH (Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus)
RecruitingObservational study
Assessment of ShuntCheck Performance Characteristics in Asymptomatic Patients With Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus
Hydrocephalus, Normal Pressure
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Q-collar in people with Low Pressure Hydrocephalus, run by University of Kansas Medical Center.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: withdrawn, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Jul 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Ventricular drainage (time frame: within 4-6 weeks). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06129565, which also lists 9 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Jul 2025.