Chronic Non-Cancer PainNCT06063902
Long-Term Opioid Therapy in Chronic Non-Cancer Pain: Risks and Benefits
An observational study of Chronic Non-Cancer Pain and Opioid Use Disorder, run by Uppsala University at 1 site in Sweden.
Trial summary
The study investigates long-term opioid treatment in patients with chronic non-cancer pain (CNCP). The study aims to prospectively identify predictive factors for work ability and for developing opioid use disorder (according to DSM-5) as well as predictive factors for pain, activity, and health-related quality of… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Chronic Non-Cancer Pain, Opioid Use Disorder
- How many people
- 1,000 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSweden
- Study dates
- 14 Jan 2019to 14 Jan 2027
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Patients with moderate to severe CNCP referred to secondary and tertiary pain care at the Uppsala University Hospital.
Who may be able to join
- Referral for a first visit to the Pain Centre of Uppsala University Hospital. The following
- Competent in Swedish
- Chronic Non-Cancer Pain (pain > 90 days)
Who cannot join
- In active cancer treatment/Cancer-related pain
- In palliative care
- Need for interpreter
- Cognitive impairment of magnitude that will prevent completion of study or ability to give informed consent
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
About this study
Official title: Long-Term Opioid Therapy in Chronic Non-Cancer Pain: Risks and Benefits - A Prospective Cohort Study of Patients Treated in Specialized Pain Care
The study investigates long-term opioid treatment in patients with chronic non-cancer pain (CNCP). The study aims to prospectively identify predictive factors for work ability and for developing opioid use disorder (according to DSM-5) as well as predictive factors for pain, activity, and health-related quality of life.
It is hypothesized that certain biopsychosocial factors mapped in this study predict patterns of opioid use and the risk for developing OUD for patients with CNCP on long-term opioid therapy. Further, it is hypothesized that certain biopsychosocial factors mapped in this study predict the chance of improved work ability and other treatment benefits of long term opioid therapy in patients with CNCP.
Read the detailed description
Chronic pain affects nearly 20% of the Swedish population. Pain from the musculoskeletal system together with psychiatric disorders are the chronic conditions that cost the most for the Swedish health care disability insurance and health care systems. Current knowledge suggests that chronic pain is maintained by changes in the nervous system together with psychological and social factors.
Opioids are known to be effective for acute and post-operative pain, and can be indispensable in palliative treatment of cancer pain. Long-term opioid therapy on the other hand is associated witg several risks, e.g., development of opioid dependence and opioid use disorder (OUD), and other opioid related complications including premature death. Clinical experience, qualitative and quantitative research suggest that some individuals with chronic pain do benefit from long-term opioid therapy in terms of clinical significant pain relief with only a low level of negative side-effects. However, evidence of change in functional outcomes and health related quality of life is ambiguous. Therefore, the role of long-term opioid therapy in chronic pain conditions remains debated and sometimes controversial.
In contrast to the well-established opioid epidemic in the U.S., little is known about the use of prescribed opioids in Sweden, and how this has developed during the last decade. The annual prevalence of opioid prescription did not change much during 2006-2017, but there were significant shifts in choice of opioids, with an increase in strong opioids e.g., oxycodone and morphine. Very little is known about what clinical consequences this shift might lead to.
The U-PAIN cohort study aims to examine patterns of prescribed opioid use, risks of adverse effects of long-term opioid therapy, and benefits of long-term opioid therapy, in a prospective clinical cohort.
The study aims to complete a broad bio-psycho-social characterization of the participants relevant to chronic pain. The study participants are followed over 5 years in order to study trajectories for patterns of opioid use, and predictive factors for opioid use disorder, work ability, pain severity and interference, and health-related quality of life.
At baseline, participants will be classified into 4 groups based on their current use of opioids:
- No use
- Short-term or intermittent use Criteria: short-term use defined as regular use of opioids for < 3 months or intermittent use as dosing up to 10 days/months (independent of time frame).
- Long-term use with low to moderate doses Criteria: use of opioids for more > 3 months, more the 10 days/month and mean daily dose < 40 mg (oral morphine milligram equivalent dose (MEE) defined as low dose. Mean daily dose 40-100 mg MEE defined as high dose.
- Long-term use with high doses Criteria: use of opioids for > 3 months. More than 100 mg MEE.
Main research questions for the cohort study are:
- What characterizes patients without opioid use disorder at baseline compared to patients with mild, moderate or severe opioid use disorder respectively at baseline?
- What variables predict their future:
- Patterns of opioid use and substance use disorder?
- Work ability, activity interference, quality of life and pain?
Potential predictors and co-variates include: (1) Individual factor and demographic variables (2) Pain characteristics, (3) Psychiatric co-morbidity and susceptibility for OUD, (3) Cognitive-behavioral variables, and (4) Physical functioning.
The objective is to identify the most salient predictors from each group and combine them into a final model with the best goodness of fit.
The four groups concerning patterns of opioid use will be statistically compared regarding key outcomes at baseline (opioid use disorders, work ability, activity interference, pain and HQoL)) by use of t-tests and chi-square tests. Logistic regression analyses will be applied for the study of predictors of opioid use, OUD, work ability, activity interference and pain. The dependent variables, e.g. OUD/no OUD will be regressed towards hypothetic predictors, grouped as described earlier, to end up with a final model including the most salient predictors from each group of variables. Multivariate regression models will be considered for continuous dependent variables.
In addition this clinical cohort will be open for other studies after ethical vetting, i.e. the cohort is unique and could contribute to further understanding of this population and hence should be open for further research.
- Conditions
- Chronic Non-Cancer Pain, Opioid Use Disorder
- Keywords
- Chronic pain, Chronic primary pain, Analgesics, Opioid, Opioid-use disorder, Work Ability, Health-related quality of life, Opioid-related risk behavior, Pain, Activity, Opioid-related complications
- Medical subject headings
- Opioid-Related Disorders, Chronic Pain, Pain, Motor Activity
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Characterization and changes in opioid use disorder
As defined in the fifth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5).
Measured by:
Structured interview: Modified version of the Swedish Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview, Part J (Substance use). Response format yes/no.
Mild opioid use disorder = 2-3 symptoms Moderate opioid use disorder = 4-5 symptoms Severe opioid use disorder = 6 or more symptoms
Measured: Baseline, 1 year, 2 years, 3 years, 4 years, 5 years
Changes in work ability
Self report. Work Ability Index (WAI). The questionnaire covers 7 dimensions:
- current work ability compared with lifetime best
- work ability in relation to the demands of the job
- number of diagnosed illnesses or limiting conditions
- estimated impairment owing to diseases/illnesses or limiting conditions
- amount of sick leave during the last year
- prognosis of work ability in 2 years' time
- psychological resources.
The dimensions have different scores. A total index is computed ranging from 7 to 49, where higher scores indicate higher work ability. Individual items or sub-scales of WAI may also be used as outcome measures.
Measured: Baseline, 1 year, 2 years, 3 years, 4 years, 5 years
Secondary outcomes (26)
Changes and patterns of opioid use (type of opioid, dose, and duration)
The Time Line Follow-Back (TLFB) Structured interview, calendar format, using 4 week intervals starting with the most recent complete week, week 1, working backward one week at a time recording days of use for each opioid.
Measured: Baseline, 1 year, 2 years, 3 years, 4 years, 5 years
Changes in pain severity and pain interference: The Brief Pain Inventory short-form (BPI-SF)
Self report. The Brief Pain Inventory. Pain severity is measured with 4 items where worst, least, average, and current pain during the past week are scored. Each scale ranges from 0-10, where 0 = 'no pain' and 10 = 'pain as bad as can be'.
Pain interference is measured with 7 items measuring how pain have interfered with the respondent's general activity, mood, walking ability, normal work, relations with other people, sleep, and enjoyment of life during the last 24 ours. Each scale ranges from 0-10, where 0 = 'Does not interfere' and 10 = 'Interferes completely'.
Higher scores indicate more pain severity and pain interference.
Measured: Baseline, 1 year, 2 years, 3 years, 4 years, 5 years
Changes in health related quality of life: EQ-5D-5L
Self report. The EuroQoL - Five dimension (EQ-5D-5L). The five dimensions are: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression, each with five levels of functioning: "1=no problems," "2=slight problems," "3=moderate problems," "4=severe problems," and "5=unable to"/ "extreme problems" for all dimensions that describe unique health states.The health states can be converted into index scores derived from population-based studies, that ranges from states worse than dead (<0) to 1 (full health), anchoring dead at 0.The EQ-5D questionnaire also includes a visual analog scale where perceived health status is rated with a grade ranging from 0 (the worst possible health status) to 100 (the best possible health status).
Measured: Baseline, 1 year, 2 years, 3 years, 4 years, 5 years
Depressive symptoms
Self report: Patient Health Questionnaire - 9 (PHQ-9), Swedish version. 9 items ranging from 0 ='not at all', to 3 ='almost every day'. 1 item ranging from 0 ='no difficulties, to 3 = 'extreme difficulties'. The first 9 items are summed to a sum score ranging from 0 to 27, where: 0-4 = no signs of depression, 5-9 = mild depression, 10-14 = moderate depression, 15-19 = moderately severe depression, 20-27 = severe depression. Item 10 is reported as a single item where high scores indicate high interference with daily function.
Measured: Baseline
Generalised Anxiety Disorder
Self report: Generalised Anxiety Disorder (GAD-7). 7 items ranging from 0 ='not at all', to 3 ='almost every day'. 1 item ranging from 0 ='no difficulties, to 3 = 'extreme difficulties'. 1 item ranging from 0 ='not at all, to 3 = 'very disturbing'. The first 7 items are summed to a sum score ranging from 0 to 21, where: 0-4 = no signs of anxiety, 5-9 = mild GAD, 10-14 = moderate GAD, 15-21 = severe GAD. Item 8 is reported as a single item where higher score means higher interference.
Measured: Baseline
Sleep
Self-report: The insomnia severity index (ISI) The ISI comprises 7 items that assess current (i.e., preceding 2 weeks) sleep problems. The first three items evaluate the severity of sleep onset, sleep maintenance, and early morning awakening problems. Subsequent items assess current sleep problem, interference with daily functioning, noticeability of impairment attributed to the sleep problem, and amount of worry due to the current sleep problem. Items are rated on a five-point Likert scale ('0' representing none or not at all and '4' representing very much). Total scores range from 0 to 28, with higher combined scores indicating worse insomnia severity.
Measured: Baseline
Pain self-efficacy
The Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire 2 (PSEQ-2), comprises 2 items that asses the participants beliefs about their ability to accomplish activities despite their pain: 'I can do some form of work, despite the pain. ("work" includes housework,paid and unpaid work)', and 'I can live a normal lifestyle, despite the pain'. Items are rated on a seven-point Likert scale ('0' not confident at all '6' Completelt confident). Total scores range from 0 to 12, with higher combined scores indicating stronger self-efficacy beliefs.
Measured: Baseline
Experienced injustice
Self report: Injustice Experience Questionnaire (IEQ), Swedish version. IEQ measure the degree of experienced injustice following an injury. Respondents are asked to indicate on a five-point scale, ranging from 0 ='never, to 4 ='all the time'. The total score is calculated by adding the scores of each item. A total score is computed by summing the scores to all 12 items, ranging from 0-48 where higher scores indicate higher experience of injustice.
Measured: Baseline
Fear of movement and reinjury
Self report, The Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia-11 (TSK-11), Swedish version. 11 items ranging from 1 to 4 where 1 = 'does not agree at all', 4 = 'totally agree'. A total score is calculated ranging from 11 to 44 where higher scores indicate higher fear of movement/kinesiophobia.
Measured: Baseline
Catastrophizing - The Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) - Swedish version.
Self report, self-administered form. The Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) - Swedish version. 13 items, ranging from 0 to 4 where 0 = 'not at all', 4 = 'all the time'. A total score is calculated ranging from 0 to 52 where higher scores indicate higher catastrophizing.
Measured: Baseline
Changes in life habits
Self-report. The Lifestyle questionnaire by the Swedish National Board of Health. Assesses physical activity and sedentary (duration in minutes and intensity), tobacco use (any use, tobacco cessation= stopped using> 6 month ago or stopped< than 6 months, and amount), diet (eating vegetables, fruit/berries, fish or shellfish, and candy/cookies; twice/day, once/day, couple of times/week, once/week, couple of times/month or less. Breakfast; every day, almost every day, few days/week, one/week or less) and alcohol use (any use, occasions/week and amount).
Measured: Baseline, 1 year, 2 years, 3 years, 4 years, 5 years
Alcohol Use
Self report: Alcohol Use Disorder Identification Test (AUDIT) Swedish version, a 10-item measure of past-year harmful and hazardous alcohol use. The AUDIT addresses three conceptual domains: alcohol consumption (three items), alcohol-related problems (four items), and adverse psychological reactions (three items). The first 8 items are scored on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 to 4, and the last two are scored on a 3-point scale with values 0, 2, and 4. The total score ranges from 0-40 with cut-off values of 8 and 6 points for men and women respectively indicate hazardous alcohol use and a score of ≥19, indicates alcohol-related problems including dependence.
Measured: Baseline
Illicit drug use
Self report. The Drug Use Disorder Identification test (DUDIT) Swedish version,an 11-item screening instrument developed to identify non-alcohol drug use patterns and drug-related problems. The first nine items are scored on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 to 4, and the last two are scored on a 3-point scale with values 0, 2, and 4. Thus, scores range from 0-44 with higher scores indicating a more severe drug problem, with cut-off values of 4 and 2 points for men and women respectively indicate hazardous drug use.
Measured: Baseline
Pain classification
International classification of disease (ICD-11).
Measured: Baseline
Personality traits
Self report. Swedish universities scale of personality (SSP), an instrument developed to measure personality traits intended to be markers for various neurobiological processes related to vulnerability to mental illness. It consists of 91 items that generates 13 different scales. For all items the respondent fill in one of four possible answer alter; not true at all, does not match particularly well, agree somewhat, exactly right. Each of the 13 scales represent relevant personality aspects and are as follow; Somatic trait anxiety (STA), Psychic trait anxiety (PsTA), Stress susceptibility (SS), Lack of assertiveness (LA), Detachment (D), Embitterment (E), Mistrust (M), Physical trait aggression (PhTA), Verbal trait aggression (VTA), Adventure seeking (AS), Impulsiveness (I), Social desirability (SD), and Trait irritability (TI). SSP has also been factor-analysed into three major dimensions, Neuroticism, Aggressiveness and Extraversion.
Measured: Baseline
Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) symptoms
Self report. ADHD Self-Report Scale (ASRS v.1.1) includes 18 items of recent DSM-IV Criterion A symptoms of adult ADHD. Respondents are asked how often a symptom has occurred over the past 6 months on a scale ranging from 0 to 4 (never, rarely, sometimes, often and very often).
Measured: Baseline
Life-time experience of traumatic events
Self-report. the Life Events Checklist (LEC) consists of 16 items inquiring about the experience of 16 different potentially traumatic events (PTE) known to result in PTSD or other posttraumatic difficulties. For each PTE, respondents rate their experience of that event on a 5-point nominal scale (1 = happened to me, 2 = witnessed it, 3 = learned about it, 4 = not sure, and 5 = does not apply).
Measured: Baseline
Walk speed
Physical functional test. 10 meters test of walking
Measured: Baseline
Balance
Physical functional test.The Mini Balance Evaluation Systems Test (mini-BESTest) consist of 14 item measuring dynamic balance. Each item is scored on a 3-category ordinal scale from 0 (unable or requiring help to perform) to 2 (normal) with a total score from 0 to 28.
Measured: Baseline
Substance use and substance use disorder
Structured interview: Modified version of the Swedish Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview, Part J (Substance use). The M.I.N.I (J) assesses eight categories of substances, including both prescribed medications and illicit substances: opioids (heroin and opium as a separate category), stimulants, cocaine, hallucinogens, inhalants, marijuana, and benzodiazepines. The substance use disorder section was modified to assess current as well as life-time drug use, and medical as well as non-medical use. Response format yes/no.
Substance use disorder defined in the fifth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5).
Mild substance use disorder = 2-3 symptoms Moderate substance use disorder= 4-5 symptoms Severe substance use disorder = 6 or more symptoms
Measured: Baseline
Explorative identification of change in biomarkers
Biomarkers will be explored by use of the OLINK (name of brand) panel which enables analysis of 92 inflammation-related protein biomarkers.
Measured: Baseline
Experienced effect of treatment/Global goal achievement
Self report. Patient global impression of change (PGIC). The measure reflects participant's beliefs about the efficacy of treatment. The patient rates overall improvement on a 7-point scale where 3 = 'very much improved', 2 = 'much improved', 1 = 'minimally improved', 0 = 'no change', -1 = 'minimally worse', -2 = 'much worse', and -3 ='very much worse'.
Measured: 1 year
Experienced effect of treatment/Global goal achievement
Self report. Patient global impression of change (PGIC). The measure reflects participant's beliefs about the efficacy of treatment. The patient rates overall improvement on a 7-point scale where 3 = 'very much improved', 2 = 'much improved', 1 = 'minimally improved', 0 = 'no change', -1 = 'minimally worse', -2 = 'much worse', and -3 ='very much worse'.
Measured: 2 year
Experienced effect of treatment/Global goal achievement
Self report. Patient global impression of change (PGIC). The measure reflects participant's beliefs about the efficacy of treatment. The patient rates overall improvement on a 7-point scale where 3 = 'very much improved', 2 = 'much improved', 1 = 'minimally improved', 0 = 'no change', -1 = 'minimally worse', -2 = 'much worse', and -3 ='very much worse'.
Measured: 3 year
Experienced effect of treatment/Global goal achievement
Self report. Patient global impression of change (PGIC). The measure reflects participant's beliefs about the efficacy of treatment. The patient rates overall improvement on a 7-point scale where 3 = 'very much improved', 2 = 'much improved', 1 = 'minimally improved', 0 = 'no change', -1 = 'minimally worse', -2 = 'much worse', and -3 ='very much worse'.
Measured: 4 year
Experienced effect of treatment/Global goal achievement
Self report. Patient global impression of change (PGIC). The measure reflects participant's beliefs about the efficacy of treatment. The patient rates overall improvement on a 7-point scale where 3 = 'very much improved', 2 = 'much improved', 1 = 'minimally improved', 0 = 'no change', -1 = 'minimally worse', -2 = 'much worse', and -3 ='very much worse'.
Measured: 5 year
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted3 Oct 2023
- Study start14 Jan 2019
- Primary completion14 Jan 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion14 Jan 2027 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Chronic Non-Cancer PainStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Uppsala UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 1,000 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Uppsala University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Pernilla Åsenlöf, Professor, Principal investigator, Uppsala University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06063902
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2016/376
- Status last verified
- Sep 2023
- First submitted
- 12 Jan 2023
- Last updated
- 3 Oct 2023
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 3 Oct 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Long-Term Opioid Therapy in Chronic Non-Cancer Pain: Risks and Benefits - A Prospective Cohort Study of Patients Treated in Specialized Pain Care
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06063902
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 2016/376
- Conditions
- Chronic Non-Cancer Pain, Opioid Use Disorder
- Keywords
- Chronic pain, Chronic primary pain, Analgesics, Opioid, Opioid-use disorder, Work Ability, Health-related quality of life, Opioid-related risk behavior
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Enrolling by invitation
- Enrolment
- 1,000 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Uppsala UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 14 Jan 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 14 Jan 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 14 Jan 2027 (estimated)
- First posted
- 3 Oct 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The study investigates long-term opioid treatment in patients with chronic non-cancer pain (CNCP). The study aims to prospectively identify predictive factors for work ability and for developing opioid use disorder (according to DSM-5) as well as predictive factors for pain, activity, and health-related quality of life.
It is hypothesized that certain biopsychosocial factors mapped in this study predict patterns of opioid use and the risk for developing OUD for patients with CNCP on long-term opioid therapy. Further, it is hypothesized that certain biopsychosocial factors mapped in this study predict the chance of improved work ability and other treatment benefits of long term opioid therapy in patients with CNCP.
Detailed description
Chronic pain affects nearly 20% of the Swedish population. Pain from the musculoskeletal system together with psychiatric disorders are the chronic conditions that cost the most for the Swedish health care disability insurance and health care systems. Current knowledge suggests that chronic pain is maintained by changes in the nervous system together with psychological and social factors.
Opioids are known to be effective for acute and post-operative pain, and can be indispensable in palliative treatment of cancer pain. Long-term opioid therapy on the other hand is associated witg several risks, e.g., development of opioid dependence and opioid use disorder (OUD), and other opioid related complications including premature death. Clinical experience, qualitative and quantitative research suggest that some individuals with chronic pain do benefit from long-term opioid therapy in terms of clinical significant pain relief with only a low level of negative side-effects. However, evidence of change in functional outcomes and health related quality of life is ambiguous. Therefore, the role of long-term opioid therapy in chronic pain conditions remains debated and sometimes controversial.
In contrast to the well-established opioid epidemic in the U.S., little is known about the use of prescribed opioids in Sweden, and how this has developed during the last decade. The annual prevalence of opioid prescription did not change much during 2006-2017, but there were significant shifts in choice of opioids, with an increase in strong opioids e.g., oxycodone and morphine. Very little is known about what clinical consequences this shift might lead to.
The U-PAIN cohort study aims to examine patterns of prescribed opioid use, risks of adverse effects of long-term opioid therapy, and benefits of long-term opioid therapy, in a prospective clinical cohort.
The study aims to complete a broad bio-psycho-social characterization of the participants relevant to chronic pain. The study participants are followed over 5 years in order to study trajectories for patterns of opioid use, and predictive factors for opioid use disorder, work ability, pain severity and interference, and health-related quality of life.
At baseline, participants will be classified into 4 groups based on their current use of opioids:
- No use
- Short-term or intermittent use Criteria: short-term use defined as regular use of opioids for < 3 months or intermittent use as dosing up to 10 days/months (independent of time frame).
- Long-term use with low to moderate doses Criteria: use of opioids for more > 3 months, more the 10 days/month and mean daily dose < 40 mg (oral morphine milligram equivalent dose (MEE) defined as low dose. Mean daily dose 40-100 mg MEE defined as high dose.
- Long-term use with high doses Criteria: use of opioids for > 3 months. More than 100 mg MEE.
Main research questions for the cohort study are:
- What characterizes patients without opioid use disorder at baseline compared to patients with mild, moderate or severe opioid use disorder respectively at baseline?
- What variables predict their future:
- Patterns of opioid use and substance use disorder?
- Work ability, activity interference, quality of life and pain?
Potential predictors and co-variates include: (1) Individual factor and demographic variables (2) Pain characteristics, (3) Psychiatric co-morbidity and susceptibility for OUD, (3) Cognitive-behavioral variables, and (4) Physical functioning.
The objective is to identify the most salient predictors from each group and combine them into a final model with the best goodness of fit.
The four groups concerning patterns of opioid use will be statistically compared regarding key outcomes at baseline (opioid use disorders, work ability, activity interference, pain and HQoL)) by use of t-tests and chi-square tests. Logistic regression analyses will be applied for the study of predictors of opioid use, OUD, work ability, activity interference and pain. The dependent variables, e.g. OUD/no OUD will be regressed towards hypothetic predictors, grouped as described earlier, to end up with a final model including the most salient predictors from each group of variables. Multivariate regression models will be considered for continuous dependent variables.
In addition this clinical cohort will be open for other studies after ethical vetting, i.e. the cohort is unique and could contribute to further understanding of this population and hence should be open for further research.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Patients with moderate to severe CNCP referred to secondary and tertiary pain care at the Uppsala University Hospital.
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Referral for a first visit to the Pain Centre of Uppsala University Hospital. The following
- Competent in Swedish
- Chronic Non-Cancer Pain (pain > 90 days)
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- In active cancer treatment/Cancer-related pain
- In palliative care
- Need for interpreter
- Cognitive impairment of magnitude that will prevent completion of study or ability to give informed consent
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Characterization and changes in opioid use disorder
Time frame: Baseline, 1 year, 2 years, 3 years, 4 years, 5 years
As defined in the fifth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5). Measured by: Structured interview: Modified version of the Swedish Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview, Part J (Substance use). Response format yes/no. Mild opioid use disorder = 2-3 symptoms Moderate opioid use disorder = 4-5 symptoms Severe opioid use disorder = 6 or more symptoms
Changes in work ability
Time frame: Baseline, 1 year, 2 years, 3 years, 4 years, 5 years
Self report. Work Ability Index (WAI). The questionnaire covers 7 dimensions: 1. current work ability compared with lifetime best 2. work ability in relation to the demands of the job 3. number of diagnosed illnesses or limiting conditions 4. estimated impairment owing to diseases/illnesses or limiting conditions 5. amount of sick leave during the last year 6. prognosis of work ability in 2 years' time 7. psychological resources. The dimensions have different scores. A total index is computed ranging from 7 to 49, where higher scores indicate higher work ability. Individual items or sub-scales of WAI may also be used as outcome measures.
26 secondary outcomes
Changes and patterns of opioid use (type of opioid, dose, and duration)
Time frame: Baseline, 1 year, 2 years, 3 years, 4 years, 5 years
Changes in pain severity and pain interference: The Brief Pain Inventory short-form (BPI-SF)
Time frame: Baseline, 1 year, 2 years, 3 years, 4 years, 5 years
Changes in health related quality of life: EQ-5D-5L
Time frame: Baseline, 1 year, 2 years, 3 years, 4 years, 5 years
Depressive symptoms
Time frame: Baseline
Generalised Anxiety Disorder
Time frame: Baseline
Sleep
Time frame: Baseline
Pain self-efficacy
Time frame: Baseline
Experienced injustice
Time frame: Baseline
Fear of movement and reinjury
Time frame: Baseline
Catastrophizing - The Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) - Swedish version.
Time frame: Baseline
Changes in life habits
Time frame: Baseline, 1 year, 2 years, 3 years, 4 years, 5 years
Alcohol Use
Time frame: Baseline
Illicit drug use
Time frame: Baseline
Pain classification
Time frame: Baseline
Personality traits
Time frame: Baseline
Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) symptoms
Time frame: Baseline
Life-time experience of traumatic events
Time frame: Baseline
Walk speed
Time frame: Baseline
Balance
Time frame: Baseline
Substance use and substance use disorder
Time frame: Baseline
Explorative identification of change in biomarkers
Time frame: Baseline
Experienced effect of treatment/Global goal achievement
Time frame: 1 year
Experienced effect of treatment/Global goal achievement
Time frame: 2 year
Experienced effect of treatment/Global goal achievement
Time frame: 3 year
Experienced effect of treatment/Global goal achievement
Time frame: 4 year
Experienced effect of treatment/Global goal achievement
Time frame: 5 year
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 3 Oct 2023.
Related trials for Chronic Non-Cancer Pain
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
Web-based Pain Coping Skills Training for Breast Cancer Survivors With AI-Associated Arthralgia
Breast Cancer, Arthralgia
Not yet recruiting
The Effect of Chiropractic Care on Opioid Use for Chronic Spinal Pain: A Feasibility Study
Back Pain
RecruitingObservational study
Risk of Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events for Naldemedine & Other Medications for Opioid Induced Constipation
Opioid-induced Constipation
Recruiting
Improved Treatment for Patients With Long-term Opioid Therapy for Non-cancer Pain in Primary Care
Chronic Pain, Chronic Pain Management
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
A Study to Evaluate the Drug-Drug Interaction Between KL0011034 Injection and Alfentanil Hydrochloride Injection in Participants With Moderate-to-Severe Non-Cancer Chronic Pain
Chronic Pain
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Pernilla Åsenlöf, Professor principal investigator
Uppsala University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Chronic Non-Cancer Pain and Opioid Use Disorder, run by Uppsala University at 1 site in Sweden.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: enrolling by invitation, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 Oct 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Sweden. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Characterization and changes in opioid use disorder (time frame: Baseline, 1 year, 2 years, 3 years, 4 years, 5 years). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 Oct 2023.