Food AddictionNCT06044285
Ultra Crave: An Investigation of Ultra-Processed Food
A study testing Low UP (meals provided) and Low UP (self-guided) in people with Food Addiction, run by University of Michigan at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
This study experimentally investigates whether a reduction in ultra-processed (UP) food intake (1) causes aversive withdrawal symptoms in humans, (2) increases the motivational salience of UP food cues and, if so, (3) whether these factors undermine the ability to adhere to a low-UP diet. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 22 to 60 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Food Addiction
- What is being tested?
- Low UP (meals provided) and Low UP (self-guided)
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 210 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 5 Aug 2023to 5 Aug 2028
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 22 to 60 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- 22 to 60 years of age
- English-speaking
- Must own an Android or iPhone Smartphone
- Able and willing to commute to the laboratory
- endorsement of ≥ 4 symptoms on the YFAS 2.0 completed during eligibility screener; at the time of consent, symptom count must remain above threshold for food addiction (this discrepany is based on a previously found tendency during pilot testing to overestimate food addiction symptoms at the time of screening)
- Willing and able to follow specific dietary instructions provided by the study team
Show all 10Show fewer
- Willing and able to attend 3 in-person lab visits
- Willing to complete 4 phone interviews about foods eaten in the past 24 hours
- Willing to report daily intake of food
- Like the taste of chocolate milkshake (for fMRI scan eligibility only).
Who cannot join
- participants with a self-reported BMI < 18.5
- Current diagnosis of disorder that may impact study results or the ability to safely complete study tasks (hypothyroidism (uncontrolled by medication), diabetes, etc.)
- History of food allergies
- Unable to respond to brief questionnaires within 90-minutes during the day
- Work night shifts or irregular shifts
- Restrictive dietary requirements (e.g., vegan) or high levels of picky eating
Show all 19Show fewer
- Medications (e.g., insulin, antipsychotic medications) that may impact study results or safe completion of study tasks
- Diagnosis of severe mental illness (e.g., schizophrenia, bipolar disorder)
- Diagnosis of a restrictive eating disorder (e.g., Anorexia Nervosa, Bulimia Nervosa, purging disorder) within the last 5 years
- Current diagnoses of disorders that can impact reward/metabolic functioning
- 20+ pound weight fluctuation in the last 3-months
- Prior weight loss surgery (e.g., bariatric surgery)
- Currently pregnant, breastfeeding, trying to get pregnant, or within 6-months of having given birth
- High levels or high-risk intake of alcohol or caffeine
- Use of tobacco or nicotine in the past month
- Use of THC cannabis within the past week
- Unwillingness to abstain from THC cannabis, tobacco or nicotine during the main portion of the study (~22 days)
- fMRI contraindications (e.g., claustrophobia, metal implants, BMI >40, etc; Note: this is an fMRI-specific exclusion criterion. participants may be allowed to participate in all other study measures that do not involve fMRI).
- inability to complete a random report within 90 minutes
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
United States1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
University of Michigan
Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109
Ashley Gearhardt, PhD, 734-647-3920, agearhar@umich.edu
About this study
Official title: Ultra Crave: A Biopsychobehavioral Investigation of Withdrawal From Ultra-Processed Food in Humans
This study experimentally investigates whether a reduction in ultra-processed (UP) food intake (1) causes aversive withdrawal symptoms in humans, (2) increases the motivational salience of UP food cues and, if so, (3) whether these factors undermine the ability to adhere to a low-UP diet. The following aims and hypotheses are tested:
Aim 1: To investigate whether aversive physical, cognitive, and affective withdrawal symptoms emerge in response to reduced UP food intake compared to a high-UP diet, and whether this predicts failure to adhere to a low-UP diet.
Read more
H1a: Reducing UP food intake will result in aversive physical, cognitive, and affective withdrawal symptoms, as indicated by 1) ecological momentary assessment (EMA) reports of aversive withdrawal symptoms, and 2) heart rate reactivity and subjective distress to an in-lab stressor.
H1b: Aversive symptoms of UP food withdrawal will predict greater UP food intake and higher blood glucose levels when trying to adhere to a low UP diet.
Aim 2: To investigate whether increased motivational salience of UP food cues emerges in response to reduced UP food intake, and whether this predicts failure to maintain a low-UP diet.
H2a: Reducing UP food intake will result in increased motivational salience of UP food cues, as indicated by 1) EMA reports of UP food craving, 2) heart rate reactivity and subjective craving in a simulated fast-food restaurant, 3) heightened reinforcement value for UP food relative to other reinforcers, and 4) greater reward-related neural response to UP food cues.
H2b: Increased motivational salience of UP food cues will predict greater UP food intake and higher blood glucose levels when trying to adhere to a low UP diet.
Read the detailed description
The study will include a combination of in-person, at-home, and virtual activities over the course of ~14 days (contingent on scheduling, this duration may vary and particularly between in-person visits #1 and #2). Participants complete three in-lab visits. Visit 1 and 2 will each followed by a week of remote data tasks (e.g., EMA, continuous glucose monitoring, physical activity and sleep tracking (Fitbit), and two 24-hour dietary recall interviews).
During in-lab visit #1, participants will complete questionnaires, behavioral tasks, and interviews, and will have body composition measurements taken (height, weight, Inbody scan). Participants will complete the remote tasks for the following week while eating their typical diet (i.e., baseline period).
During in-lab visit #2, participants will complete questionnaires, interviews, and body composition measurements (height, weight, Inbody scan). Participants are randomly assigned to one of three conditions--control (i.e., high UP), self-guided low UP, or meals provided low UP--and will follow instructions about how to eat consistent with their condition during week 2 of remote data collection (i.e., dietary intervention period).
During in-lab visit #3, participants will complete questionnaires, behavioral tasks, body composition measurements (height, weight, InBody scan), and an fMRI scan.
Participants are contacted 1- and 3-months later to complete a short follow-up survey and provide information about their current diet.
- Conditions
- Food Addiction
- Being tested
- Low UP (meals provided), Low UP (self-guided), Active Control
- Keywords
- Withdrawal, Food Addiction, Highly Processed Foods
- Medical subject headings
- Food Addiction
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Low UP (meals provided)Other
This study incorporates within- and between-subject comparisons. All participants complete a series of three in-lab visits with remote data collection:
Visit 1 and the following week comprise the baseline assessment period.
Visit 2 and the following week comprise the dietary intervention period. Food is provided by the study team for 7 days in accordance with a low UP diet.
Visit 3 assesses post-dietary intervention outcomes. All participants will complete remote assessments at 1 month and 3 month follow-up.
Low UP (self-guided)Other
Visit 1 and the following week comprise the baseline assessment period.
Visit 2 and the following week comprise the dietary intervention period. Participants are asked to eat a low UP diet according to study provided nutritional guidance.
Visit 3 assesses post-dietary intervention outcomes. All participants will complete remote assessments at 1 month and 3 month follow-up.
Active ControlOther
Visit 1 and the following week comprise the baseline assessment period.
Visit 2 and the following week comprise the dietary intervention period. Participants are asked to eat as they normally do.
Visit 3 assesses post-dietary intervention outcomes. All participants will complete remote assessments at 1 month and 3 month follow-up.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Self-Guided Low UP Food Diet | Experimental | Participants asked to eat a low UP food diet according to study provided nutritional guidance. Receives: Other: Low UP (self-guided) |
| Meals Provided Low UP Food Diet | Experimental | .Participants asked to eat a low UP food diet provided by the study team. Receives: Other: Low UP (meals provided) |
| Control | Active comparator | Participants asked to eat as they usually do. Receives: Other: Active Control |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Withdrawal Symptoms
Withdrawal symptoms (e.g., anger, anxiety) will be assessed using ecological momentary assessment (EMA) on a scale from 1 (not at all) to 7 (extremely); higher scores indicate greater withdrawal symptoms.
Measured: Assessed during dietary intervention period for 1 week
Craving of ultra-processed (UP) foods
Craving of UP foods will be assessed using EMA on a scale from 1 (not at all) to 7 (extremely); higher scores indicate greater craving of UP foods.
Measured: Assessed during dietary intervention period for 1 week
Low UP food intake
Intake of low UP foods will be assessed using two 24 hour dietary recall interviews.
Measured: Assessed during dietary intervention period for 1 week
Self-Reported Low UP food intake
Intake of low UP foods will be assessed using EMA reports of food intake. Responses will be coded into high and low UP food intake based on the NOVA classification.
Measured: Assessed during dietary intervention period for 1 week
Secondary outcomes (7)
Reactivity to a stressor
Stress reactivity will be assessed using an in-lab stress task that has participants listen to an audio recording of a current stressor in their life. Participants' heart rate in response to the audio recording, relative to a baseline measurement, will be used as an indicator of stress reactivity; an increase in heart rate will be indicative of greater stress reactivity.
Measured: Assessed post-dietary intervention during in-lab Visit 3 (1 day)
Self-reported reactivity to a stressor
Stress reactivity will be assessed using an in-lab stress task that has participants listen to an audio recording of a current stressor in their life. Participants' subjective ratings of reactivity will be assessed at baseline (prior to listening to the audio recording) and immediately after listening to the audio recording using the negative affect subscale from the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS); each item is rated on a 1 (very slightly or not at all) to 5 (extremely) scale, with higher numbers indicating greater experienced affect; an increase in score, relative to baseline, will indicate greater stress reactivity.
Measured: Assessed post-dietary intervention during in-lab Visit 3 (1 day)
Cue reactivity to a simulated fast food restaurant
Participants will spend 5 minutes in a simulated fast food restaurant. Participants' heart rate in response to the simulated fast food restaurant, relative to a baseline measurement, will be used as an indicator of cue reactivity; increases in will be indicative of greater cue reactivity.
Measured: Assessed post-dietary intervention during in-lab Visit 3 (1 day)
Self-reported cue reactivity to a simulated fast food restaurant
Participants will spend 5 minutes in a simulated fast food restaurant. Participants' subjective craving will be assessed at baseline (prior to entering the restaurant) and while in the restaurant on a scale from 0 (no craving at all) to 100 (I have never craved food more), with greater numbers indicating higher craving; an increase in score, relative to baseline, will indicate greater cue reactivity.
Measured: Assessed post-dietary intervention during in-lab Visit 3 (1 day)
Level of reinforcement value for ultra processed foods
Participants will complete a computerized task that measures their willingness to work (i.e., reinforcement value) for a UP food gift card relative to a non-food gift card.
Measured: Baseline assessed during in-lab Visit 1 (1 day); assessed again post-dietary intervention during in-lab Visit 3 (1 day)
Magnitude of neural reward-related response to tasting a milkshake
Participants will complete an fMRI paradigm where they see a UP food cue (i.e., picture of a chocolate milkshake) that predict receipt of a UP food (i.e., a chocolate milkshake). The paradigm also includes a control cue (i.e., picture of a water glass) that predicts receipt of a tasteless solution (which contains the ionic components of saliva; 25 mM KCl and 2.5 mM NaHCO3 in distilled water). Participants' activation in neural regions associated with reward (e.g., mOFC, striatum) to the milkshake cue (relative to the water cue) will be used as a measure of increased reward-related response to UP food cues.
Measured: Assessed post-dietary intervention during in-lab Visit 3 (1 day)
Blood Glucose Level
Assessed using a continuous blood glucose monitor.
Measured: Assessed during dietary intervention period for 1 week
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted21 Sep 2023
- Study start5 Aug 2023
- Primary completion5 Aug 2028 (estimated)
- Study completion5 Aug 2028 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Food AddictionStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of MichiganThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Basic science
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Multi-method, within subjects, perspectives, experimental design
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 210 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Michigan
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA), Oregon Research Institute, University of Tasmania, Brown University, Pennington Biomedical Research Center
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Ashley Gearhardt, University of Michigan
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06044285
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- HUM00226716
- Other IDs
- 1R01DA055027-01A1
- Status last verified
- Sep 2026
- First submitted
- 11 Aug 2023
- Last updated
- 24 Sep 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: This research will generate demographic, neural, heart rate, ecological momentary assessment, continuous glucose monitoring, self-report and anthropometric data. The data will be stored as SPSS or SAS files. Meta data will also be included in the selected repositories. The metadata will include the data dictionaries, which describe the generation of all variables. The deidentified data will be made available within one year of completion of the study at the University of Michigan's data repository - Deep Blue.
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 24 Sep 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Ultra Crave: A Biopsychobehavioral Investigation of Withdrawal From Ultra-Processed Food in Humans
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06044285
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- HUM00226716
- Conditions
- Food Addiction
- Keywords
- Withdrawal, Food Addiction, Highly Processed Foods
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 210 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- University of MichiganUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA), Oregon Research Institute, University of Tasmania, Brown University, Pennington Biomedical Research Center
- Study start
- 5 Aug 2023 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 5 Aug 2028 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 5 Aug 2028 (estimated)
- First posted
- 21 Sep 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study experimentally investigates whether a reduction in ultra-processed (UP) food intake (1) causes aversive withdrawal symptoms in humans, (2) increases the motivational salience of UP food cues and, if so, (3) whether these factors undermine the ability to adhere to a low-UP diet. The following aims and hypotheses are tested:
Aim 1: To investigate whether aversive physical, cognitive, and affective withdrawal symptoms emerge in response to reduced UP food intake compared to a high-UP diet, and whether this predicts failure to adhere to a low-UP diet.
H1a: Reducing UP food intake will result in aversive physical, cognitive, and affective withdrawal symptoms, as indicated by 1) ecological momentary assessment (EMA) reports of aversive withdrawal symptoms, and 2) heart rate reactivity and subjective distress to an in-lab stressor.
H1b: Aversive symptoms of UP food withdrawal will predict greater UP food intake and higher blood glucose levels when trying to adhere to a low UP diet.
Aim 2: To investigate whether increased motivational salience of UP food cues emerges in response to reduced UP food intake, and whether this predicts failure to maintain a low-UP diet.
H2a: Reducing UP food intake will result in increased motivational salience of UP food cues, as indicated by 1) EMA reports of UP food craving, 2) heart rate reactivity and subjective craving in a simulated fast-food restaurant, 3) heightened reinforcement value for UP food relative to other reinforcers, and 4) greater reward-related neural response to UP food cues.
H2b: Increased motivational salience of UP food cues will predict greater UP food intake and higher blood glucose levels when trying to adhere to a low UP diet.
Detailed description
The study will include a combination of in-person, at-home, and virtual activities over the course of ~14 days (contingent on scheduling, this duration may vary and particularly between in-person visits #1 and #2). Participants complete three in-lab visits. Visit 1 and 2 will each followed by a week of remote data tasks (e.g., EMA, continuous glucose monitoring, physical activity and sleep tracking (Fitbit), and two 24-hour dietary recall interviews).
During in-lab visit #1, participants will complete questionnaires, behavioral tasks, and interviews, and will have body composition measurements taken (height, weight, Inbody scan). Participants will complete the remote tasks for the following week while eating their typical diet (i.e., baseline period).
During in-lab visit #2, participants will complete questionnaires, interviews, and body composition measurements (height, weight, Inbody scan). Participants are randomly assigned to one of three conditions--control (i.e., high UP), self-guided low UP, or meals provided low UP--and will follow instructions about how to eat consistent with their condition during week 2 of remote data collection (i.e., dietary intervention period).
During in-lab visit #3, participants will complete questionnaires, behavioral tasks, body composition measurements (height, weight, InBody scan), and an fMRI scan.
Participants are contacted 1- and 3-months later to complete a short follow-up survey and provide information about their current diet.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Basic science
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 3
- Model description
- Multi-method, within subjects, perspectives, experimental design
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Self-Guided Low UP Food Diet | Experimental | Other: Low UP (self-guided)Participants asked to eat a low UP food diet according to study provided nutritional guidance. |
| Meals Provided Low UP Food Diet | Experimental | Other: Low UP (meals provided).Participants asked to eat a low UP food diet provided by the study team. |
| Control | Active comparator | Other: Active ControlParticipants asked to eat as they usually do. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 22 to 60 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (10 listed)
- 22 to 60 years of age
- English-speaking
- Must own an Android or iPhone Smartphone
- Able and willing to commute to the laboratory
- endorsement of ≥ 4 symptoms on the YFAS 2.0 completed during eligibility screener; at the time of consent, symptom count must remain above threshold for food addiction (this discrepany is based on a previously found tendency during pilot testing to overestimate food addiction symptoms at the time of screening)
Key exclusion criteria (19 listed)
- participants with a self-reported BMI < 18.5
- Current diagnosis of disorder that may impact study results or the ability to safely complete study tasks (hypothyroidism (uncontrolled by medication), diabetes, etc.)
- History of food allergies
- Unable to respond to brief questionnaires within 90-minutes during the day
- Work night shifts or irregular shifts
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Low UP (meals provided)This study incorporates within- and between-subject comparisons. All participants complete a series of three in-lab visits with remote data collection: Visit 1 and the following week comprise the baseline assessment period. Visit 2 and the following week comprise the dietary intervention period. Food is provided by the study team for 7 days in accordance with a low UP diet. Visit 3 assesses post-dietary intervention outcomes. All participants will complete remote assessments at 1 month and 3 month follow-up. | Other | Meals Provided Low UP Food Diet |
| Low UP (self-guided)Visit 1 and the following week comprise the baseline assessment period. Visit 2 and the following week comprise the dietary intervention period. Participants are asked to eat a low UP diet according to study provided nutritional guidance. Visit 3 assesses post-dietary intervention outcomes. All participants will complete remote assessments at 1 month and 3 month follow-up. | Other | Self-Guided Low UP Food Diet |
| Active ControlVisit 1 and the following week comprise the baseline assessment period. Visit 2 and the following week comprise the dietary intervention period. Participants are asked to eat as they normally do. Visit 3 assesses post-dietary intervention outcomes. All participants will complete remote assessments at 1 month and 3 month follow-up. | Other | Control |
Primary outcome
Withdrawal Symptoms
Time frame: Assessed during dietary intervention period for 1 week
Withdrawal symptoms (e.g., anger, anxiety) will be assessed using ecological momentary assessment (EMA) on a scale from 1 (not at all) to 7 (extremely); higher scores indicate greater withdrawal symptoms.
Craving of ultra-processed (UP) foods
Time frame: Assessed during dietary intervention period for 1 week
Craving of UP foods will be assessed using EMA on a scale from 1 (not at all) to 7 (extremely); higher scores indicate greater craving of UP foods.
Low UP food intake
Time frame: Assessed during dietary intervention period for 1 week
Intake of low UP foods will be assessed using two 24 hour dietary recall interviews.
Self-Reported Low UP food intake
Time frame: Assessed during dietary intervention period for 1 week
Intake of low UP foods will be assessed using EMA reports of food intake. Responses will be coded into high and low UP food intake based on the NOVA classification.
7 secondary outcomes
Reactivity to a stressor
Time frame: Assessed post-dietary intervention during in-lab Visit 3 (1 day)
Self-reported reactivity to a stressor
Time frame: Assessed post-dietary intervention during in-lab Visit 3 (1 day)
Cue reactivity to a simulated fast food restaurant
Time frame: Assessed post-dietary intervention during in-lab Visit 3 (1 day)
Self-reported cue reactivity to a simulated fast food restaurant
Time frame: Assessed post-dietary intervention during in-lab Visit 3 (1 day)
Level of reinforcement value for ultra processed foods
Time frame: Baseline assessed during in-lab Visit 1 (1 day); assessed again post-dietary intervention during in-lab Visit 3 (1 day)
Magnitude of neural reward-related response to tasting a milkshake
Time frame: Assessed post-dietary intervention during in-lab Visit 3 (1 day)
Blood Glucose Level
Time frame: Assessed during dietary intervention period for 1 week
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 24 Sep 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. This research will generate demographic, neural, heart rate, ecological momentary assessment, continuous glucose monitoring, self-report and anthropometric data. The data will be stored as SPSS or SAS files. Meta data will also be included in the selected repositories. The metadata will include the data dictionaries, which describe the generation of all variables. The deidentified data will be made available within one year of completion of the study at the University of Michigan's data repository - Deep Blue.
Related trials for Food Addiction
Not yet recruiting
Compulsive Eating and Brain's Reward System in Different Pathologies
PARKINSON DISEASE (Disorder), Bipolar 1 Disorder
RecruitingObservational study
Is Craving a Central Criterion for Diagnosing a Behavioral Addiction?
Addictive Behaviors, Internet Addiction Disorder
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Physiopathology of Behavioral Addictions and Biomarkers
Food Addiction, Sexual Addiction
Active, not recruiting
Biobehavioral Reward Responses Associated With Consumption of Nutritionally Diverse Ultra-Processed Foods
Obesity, Overeating
Recruiting
Effects of Semaglutide on Brain Dopamine Responses to Food Cues in Adults With Obesity and Food Addiction Tendencies
Food Addiction Tendency, Obesity
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Low UP (meals provided) and Low UP (self-guided) in people with Food Addiction, run by University of Michigan at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 10 inclusion and 19 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Sep 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Ashley Gearhardt, PhD (734-647-3920, agearhar@umich.edu), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Withdrawal Symptoms (time frame: Assessed during dietary intervention period for 1 week). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Sep 2026.