Gastroesophageal HerniaHillKINGNCT06040723
Hill-grade Knowledge Via Integrated Neural-network for Gastroscopy
An observational study of Gastroesophageal Hernia, run by Wuerzburg University Hospital at 1 site in Germany.
Trial summary
The Hill classification, also known as the Hill grade, is a system used to classify the severity of gastroesophageal valve incompetence, specifically related to gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and hiatal hernia. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Gastroesophageal Hernia
- What is being tested?
- EndoMind
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- How many people
- 195 participants
- Where
- 1 siteGermany
- Study dates
- 10 Oct 2023to 22 Dec 2023
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: All adult patients that have not undergone and are not undergoing a surgery for reconstruction of the flap-valve.
Who may be able to join
- Adult patients (>18 years)
- Scheduled gastroscopy
Who cannot join
- Examination level
- Previous surgical interventions or altered anatomy that prevents the proper examination of the flap valve
- Flap-valve not inspected
- Data Level:
- Image during flap-valve inspection not stored
- Expert committee not resulting in a majority vote
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Real Time Determination of the Hill Grade During Gastroscopy Using Artificial Intelligence
The Hill classification, also known as the Hill grade, is a system used to classify the severity of gastroesophageal valve incompetence, specifically related to gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and hiatal hernia. This study aims to compare the ability of physicians versus an AI model to asses the Hill grade during gastroscopy.
Read the detailed description
Objective:
The primary goal of this study is to compare the accuracy in determining the Hill classification during gastroscopy between an artificial intelligence (AI) based system and physicians performing the examination. Secondary outcomes include evaluation of the per-class accuracy and other statistical measures such as precision, recall and f1 score.
Study Design:
Single center, endoscopist blinded study. The model considered in a previous study achieved a mean accuracy of 88%. All participants initially attended a lecture serving as a refresher regarding the Hill classification. Subsequently, physicians were asked to provide the Hill classification for test images expert annotated images depicting different Hill grades, achieving mean accuracy of 72%. Thus 127 paired measurements are required. Taking patient drop-out into consideration, at least 159 patients need to be recruited. Upon examination of the flap-valve during endoscopy, the physician is required to store an image of the flap-valve during retroflexion, which is part of the standard procedure, based on which they determine the Hill classification. The prediction of the AI model on this image is considered the model output and is considered the model's output. A group of three expert endoscopists determines the Hill classification for each image, based on majority vote, which is treated as the gold standard.
AI setup and limitations:
There are no limitations caused by the AI. The method performs a frame-by-frame analysis of the recording. These images are parsed from the AI based system in order to obtain predictions. The only interactions required with the method is a button press that initiates the examination recording process and a second button press to terminate the recording. This is performed at the beginning and end of the examination respectively. The model used in this study is an updated version of the model reported in a preliminary study, that has been trained with more data together with an auxiliary output for predicting if the Hill classification is relevant to the shown image.
Study population:
All adult patients appointed for gastroscopy that do not match the exclusion criteria will be asked for informed consent. Exclusion criteria include previous surgical interventions or altered anatomy that prevents the proper examination of the flap valve, examinations where the flap-valve is not inspected, and examinations where the expert committee does not produce a majority vote.
Intervention:
The physician performs the examination as usual. Upon inspection of the flap valve, the physician captures an image of the examination, as usual, and gives their assessment of the Hill grade. The output of the model for the same image is considered the model prediction. The physician is blinded to the model's prediction.
- Conditions
- Gastroesophageal Hernia
- Being tested
- EndoMind
- Keywords
- Hill grade, Gastroscopy, Gastroesophageal Flap Valve, Artificial Intelligence
- Medical subject headings
- Hernia, Hiatal
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
EndoMindDevice
The EndoMind system is equipped with an AI model for predicting the Hill grade during gastroscopy.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Experimental: Intervention arm | All patients within the study are included in the intervention arm: The Hill classification is determined by the physician and the AI method. Receives: Device: EndoMind |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Accuracy of assessments for the Hill classification for physicians and AI method.
Binary assessment of physician vs AI correct and erroneous predictions.
Measured: Through study completion, an average of 5 months
Secondary outcomes (3)
Accuracy of assessments for each Hill grade for physicians and AI method.
Description: The correct and erroneous predictions for each specific Hill class.
Measured: Through study completion, an average of 5 months
Precision and recall of the assessments for each Hill from endoscopists and AI method.
The precision, and recall statistics for each class (1v0) over the four different Hill classes.
Measured: Through study completion, an average of 5 months
Distance for label assessment from gold standard label.
Comparison of the distance between the gold standard label and the label assigned by the physician and AI method.
Measured: Through study completion, an average of 5 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted15 Sep 2023
- Study start10 Oct 2023
- Primary completion22 Dec 2023
- Study completion22 Dec 2023
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Gastroesophageal HerniaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Case only
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 195 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Wuerzburg University Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06040723
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- AI04
- Acronym
- HillKING
- Status last verified
- May 2024
- First submitted
- 8 Sep 2023
- Last updated
- 9 May 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Kafetzis I, Sodmann P, Herghelegiu BE, Brand M, Zoller WG, Seyfried F, Fuchs KH, Meining A, Hann A. Prospective Evaluation of Real-Time Artificial Intelligence for the Hill Classification of the Gastroesophageal Junction. United European Gastroenterol J. 2025 Mar;13(2):240-246. doi: 10.1002/ueg2.12721. Epub 2024 Dec 12.
PubMed 39668544
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 9 May 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Real Time Determination of the Hill Grade During Gastroscopy Using Artificial Intelligence
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06040723
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- HillKING / AI04
- Conditions
- Gastroesophageal Hernia
- Keywords
- Hill grade, Gastroscopy, Gastroesophageal Flap Valve, Artificial Intelligence
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 195 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Wuerzburg University HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 10 Oct 2023 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 22 Dec 2023 (actual)
- Study completion
- 22 Dec 2023 (actual)
- First posted
- 15 Sep 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The Hill classification, also known as the Hill grade, is a system used to classify the severity of gastroesophageal valve incompetence, specifically related to gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and hiatal hernia. This study aims to compare the ability of physicians versus an AI model to asses the Hill grade during gastroscopy.
Detailed description
Objective:
The primary goal of this study is to compare the accuracy in determining the Hill classification during gastroscopy between an artificial intelligence (AI) based system and physicians performing the examination. Secondary outcomes include evaluation of the per-class accuracy and other statistical measures such as precision, recall and f1 score.
Study Design:
Single center, endoscopist blinded study. The model considered in a previous study achieved a mean accuracy of 88%. All participants initially attended a lecture serving as a refresher regarding the Hill classification. Subsequently, physicians were asked to provide the Hill classification for test images expert annotated images depicting different Hill grades, achieving mean accuracy of 72%. Thus 127 paired measurements are required. Taking patient drop-out into consideration, at least 159 patients need to be recruited. Upon examination of the flap-valve during endoscopy, the physician is required to store an image of the flap-valve during retroflexion, which is part of the standard procedure, based on which they determine the Hill classification. The prediction of the AI model on this image is considered the model output and is considered the model's output. A group of three expert endoscopists determines the Hill classification for each image, based on majority vote, which is treated as the gold standard.
AI setup and limitations:
There are no limitations caused by the AI. The method performs a frame-by-frame analysis of the recording. These images are parsed from the AI based system in order to obtain predictions. The only interactions required with the method is a button press that initiates the examination recording process and a second button press to terminate the recording. This is performed at the beginning and end of the examination respectively. The model used in this study is an updated version of the model reported in a preliminary study, that has been trained with more data together with an auxiliary output for predicting if the Hill classification is relevant to the shown image.
Study population:
All adult patients appointed for gastroscopy that do not match the exclusion criteria will be asked for informed consent. Exclusion criteria include previous surgical interventions or altered anatomy that prevents the proper examination of the flap valve, examinations where the flap-valve is not inspected, and examinations where the expert committee does not produce a majority vote.
Intervention:
The physician performs the examination as usual. Upon inspection of the flap valve, the physician captures an image of the examination, as usual, and gives their assessment of the Hill grade. The output of the model for the same image is considered the model prediction. The physician is blinded to the model's prediction.
Study design
- Observational model
- Case only
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Experimental: Intervention arm | – | Device: EndoMindAll patients within the study are included in the intervention arm: The Hill classification is determined by the physician and the AI method. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- All adult patients that have not undergone and are not undergoing a surgery for reconstruction of the flap-valve.
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Adult patients (>18 years)
- Scheduled gastroscopy
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Examination level
- Previous surgical interventions or altered anatomy that prevents the proper examination of the flap valve
- Flap-valve not inspected
- Image during flap-valve inspection not stored
- Expert committee not resulting in a majority vote
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| EndoMindThe EndoMind system is equipped with an AI model for predicting the Hill grade during gastroscopy. | Device | Experimental: Intervention arm |
Primary outcome
Accuracy of assessments for the Hill classification for physicians and AI method.
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 5 months
Binary assessment of physician vs AI correct and erroneous predictions.
3 secondary outcomes
Accuracy of assessments for each Hill grade for physicians and AI method.
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 5 months
Precision and recall of the assessments for each Hill from endoscopists and AI method.
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 5 months
Distance for label assessment from gold standard label.
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 5 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 9 May 2024.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 39668544Kafetzis I, Sodmann P, Herghelegiu BE, Brand M, Zoller WG, Seyfried F, Fuchs KH, Meining A, Hann A. Prospective Evaluation of Real-Time Artificial Intelligence for the Hill Classification of the Gastroesophageal Junction. United European Gastroenterol J. 2025 Mar;13(2):240-246. doi: 10.1002/ueg2.12721. Epub 2024 Dec 12.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Gastroesophageal Hernia
Active, not recruiting
Gastropexy in the Repair of Patients With Paraesophageal Hernias
Paraesophageal Hernia
Recruiting
Mesh Vs Pledgets for Repair of Paraesophageal Hernia
Paraesophageal Hernia, GERD
Recruiting
Phrenoesophageal Ligament Reconstruction With Mesh
Hiatus Hernia, Gastreoesophageal Reflux Disease
RecruitingObservational study
Preoperative Predictors of Symptom Improvement After Laparoscopic Fundoplication
Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease, Hiatal Hernia
Active, not recruiting
Multicenter Single-Blind RCT of CTIF Versus LNF For Treatment of GERD in Patients Requiring Hiatal Hernia Repair
GERD, Hiatal Hernia
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Gastroesophageal Hernia, run by Wuerzburg University Hospital at 1 site in Germany.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 May 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Germany. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Accuracy of assessments for the Hill classification for physicians and AI method. (time frame: Through study completion, an average of 5 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06040723, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 May 2024.