Bladder DysfunctionNCT05968352
Restoration of Bladder Function in Spinal Cord Injury
An observational study of Bladder Dysfunction and Spinal Cord Injuries, run by University of Oxford at 1 site in United Kingdom.
Trial summary
The aim of this study is to develop improved methods of restoring function to the neurogenic bladder, using electrical stimulation without cutting nerves in patients with spinal cord injury. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Bladder Dysfunction, Spinal Cord Injuries
- What is being tested?
- Sacral Anterior Root Stimulation (SARS)
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- How many people
- 0 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited Kingdom
- Study dates
- 18 Nov 2021to 14 Oct 2025
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Patients with clinically complete spinal cord injury who have undergone implantation of a Finetech Brindley Bladder Controller, with or without sacral posterior rhizotomy. John Radcliffe Hospital (Oxford), Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital (Stanmore) and Walton Centre (Liverpool) will be both patient identification centres and research sites for this study. Stoke Mandeville Hospital will be an additional patient identification centre, but studies on patients identified there will be conducted at Oxford as patients are generally under joint care between Stoke Mandeville Hospital and Oxford.
Who may be able to join
- Patients with clinically complete spinal cord injury who have undergone implantation of a Finetech Brindley Bladder controller, with or without sacral posterior rhizotomy.
- Male or female, aged 18 years or over.
- Patients willing and able to give informed consent to involvement in the study
Who cannot join
- External urethral sphincterotomy
- Patients are taking part in any studies on drugs or devices that alter bladder or autonomic function
- Any other significant comorbidity or illness that would preclude their participation or increase the risk to them of participating in the study
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
The aim of this study is to develop improved methods of restoring function to the neurogenic bladder, using electrical stimulation without cutting nerves in patients with spinal cord injury.
The investigators will test 5-10 subjects with existing sacral anterior root stimulation (SARS) devices and look at the effects of high frequency (up to 600Hz) compared to the usual low frequency stimulation on bladder function. The investigators are particularly interested in whether it is possible to reproduce a 'functional' dorzal rhizotomy using high frequency stimulation of the S2 efferent nerves
Read the detailed description
This is a proof of concept study of the effects on the urinary bladder and sphincter of high frequency stimuli applied to sacral efferent nerves. The effects on the bladder of low frequency stimuli applied to sacral afferent nerves will also be studied. It is also part of an academic collaboration between Oxford and Stanford University. The results will not be sold to Stanford but will be shared to enhance the development of therapies for patients with spinal cord injury. There is no intention to commercialise the findings at this stage nor to use the data for CE-marking.
Participants will be patients with clinically complete spinal cord injury who already have a commercially available implanted Finetech Brindley bladder stimulator with electrodes on the sacral nerves or roots, controlled by an external transmitter whose frequency can be adjusted by the investigator. This study will explore modified stimulation parameters and will deliver the stimulation pattern with a modified/experimental external stimulation control unit. The motivation for exploring these parameters is to see if clinical efficacy might be improved for future systems.
Primary outcome: Measurement of the effects of high and low frequency stimulation of the sacral efferent nerves on Bladder Pressure, rectal pressure, Detrusor pressure, Sphincter pressure, volume voided, post-void residual volume, voiding flow rate
Secondary measures: Effects of low frequency stimulation on bladder pressure, bladder capacity and reflex incontinence
The exploration of these novel stimulation parameters will require modification of the existing CE-marked system. The modifications will be limited to the external stimulation control unit, and will not compromise either the implantable system or its capability to continue normal operation with the existing CE-marked external control unit. The modified external stimulation control unit will be referred to as the "research stimulation controller." The use environment for the research stimulation controller will be a controlled hospital/laboratory setting, under clinical supervision. Outside of the clinic, the CE-marked system will be used to ensure normal therapy is provided to the subject. Access to the research stimulation controller will be controlled by the PI to prevent inadvertent misuse.
The development of the research stimulation controller will follow accepted good design practices. More specifically, the team will use a scaled version of 13845-compliant processes to 1) assess user needs 2) generate a risk analysis and plan 3) develop system requirements from design inputs 4) document and summarize design outputs 5) perform device verification tests and 6) perform user validation tests. These files will be maintained in a controlled document system.
The modified controller is similar to the CE marked device but will allow the investigators to explore a wider range of electrical stimulation parameters such as different waveforms and higher frequencies. Our intention is to use up to 600 Hz frequencies, compared to the existing frequencies in this device of up to 53 Hz. These changes are modest and are well within the energy delivery provided by existing commercial neuromodulation systems such as spinal cord stimulation (typical parameters for spinal cord stimulation include the Nevro® system that delivers up to 10kHz). Patients both with and without posterior sacral rhizotomy will also be included. No further surgery is required. Measurements of bladder function will be made in the urodynamic laboratory.
The study is prospective and unblinded. Each participant will serve as their own control; outcome measures will be compared with different frequencies of electrical stimuli and with no electrical stimuli.
- Conditions
- Bladder Dysfunction, Spinal Cord Injuries
- Being tested
- Sacral Anterior Root Stimulation (SARS)
- Medical subject headings
- Spinal Cord Injuries
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Sacral Anterior Root Stimulation (SARS)Device
Comparison of High frequency versus low frequency stimulation
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Bladder Pressure
Urodynamics testing - High frequency SARS
Measured: 2-3 hours
Rectal Pressure
Urodynamics- High frequency SARS
Measured: 2-3 hours
Detrusor Pressure
Urodynamics- High frequency SARS
Measured: 2-3 hours
Sphincter Pressure
Urodynamics1- High frequency SARS
Measured: 2-3 hours
Volume voided
urodynamics- High frequency SARS
Measured: 2-3 hours
Post-void residual volume
Urodynamics- High frequency SARS
Measured: 2-3 hours
Voiding Flow Rate
Urodynamics- High frequency SARS
Measured: 2-3 hours
Secondary outcomes (3)
Bladder pressure
Urodynamics - Low frequency SARS
Measured: 2-3 hours
Bladder Capacity
Urodynamics - Low frequency SARS
Measured: 2-3 hours
Reflex incontinence
Urodynamics - Low frequency SARS
Measured: 2-3 hours
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted1 Aug 2023
- Study start18 Nov 2021
- Primary completion14 Oct 2025
- Study completion14 Oct 2025
Why it stopped: Unable to find participants to recruit
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Bladder DysfunctionStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of OxfordThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Case only
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 0 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Oxford
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05968352
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- IRAS 260021
- Status last verified
- Oct 2025
- First submitted
- 20 Jul 2023
- Last updated
- 18 Nov 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 18 Nov 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Restoration of Bladder Function in Spinal Cord Injury
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05968352
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- IRAS 260021
- Conditions
- Bladder Dysfunction, Spinal Cord Injuries
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- WithdrawnReason stopped: Unable to find participants to recruit
- Enrolment
- 0 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of OxfordUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 18 Nov 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 14 Oct 2025 (actual)
- Study completion
- 14 Oct 2025 (actual)
- First posted
- 1 Aug 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The aim of this study is to develop improved methods of restoring function to the neurogenic bladder, using electrical stimulation without cutting nerves in patients with spinal cord injury.
The investigators will test 5-10 subjects with existing sacral anterior root stimulation (SARS) devices and look at the effects of high frequency (up to 600Hz) compared to the usual low frequency stimulation on bladder function. The investigators are particularly interested in whether it is possible to reproduce a 'functional' dorzal rhizotomy using high frequency stimulation of the S2 efferent nerves
Detailed description
This is a proof of concept study of the effects on the urinary bladder and sphincter of high frequency stimuli applied to sacral efferent nerves. The effects on the bladder of low frequency stimuli applied to sacral afferent nerves will also be studied. It is also part of an academic collaboration between Oxford and Stanford University. The results will not be sold to Stanford but will be shared to enhance the development of therapies for patients with spinal cord injury. There is no intention to commercialise the findings at this stage nor to use the data for CE-marking.
Participants will be patients with clinically complete spinal cord injury who already have a commercially available implanted Finetech Brindley bladder stimulator with electrodes on the sacral nerves or roots, controlled by an external transmitter whose frequency can be adjusted by the investigator. This study will explore modified stimulation parameters and will deliver the stimulation pattern with a modified/experimental external stimulation control unit. The motivation for exploring these parameters is to see if clinical efficacy might be improved for future systems.
Primary outcome: Measurement of the effects of high and low frequency stimulation of the sacral efferent nerves on Bladder Pressure, rectal pressure, Detrusor pressure, Sphincter pressure, volume voided, post-void residual volume, voiding flow rate
Secondary measures: Effects of low frequency stimulation on bladder pressure, bladder capacity and reflex incontinence
The exploration of these novel stimulation parameters will require modification of the existing CE-marked system. The modifications will be limited to the external stimulation control unit, and will not compromise either the implantable system or its capability to continue normal operation with the existing CE-marked external control unit. The modified external stimulation control unit will be referred to as the "research stimulation controller." The use environment for the research stimulation controller will be a controlled hospital/laboratory setting, under clinical supervision. Outside of the clinic, the CE-marked system will be used to ensure normal therapy is provided to the subject. Access to the research stimulation controller will be controlled by the PI to prevent inadvertent misuse.
The development of the research stimulation controller will follow accepted good design practices. More specifically, the team will use a scaled version of 13845-compliant processes to 1) assess user needs 2) generate a risk analysis and plan 3) develop system requirements from design inputs 4) document and summarize design outputs 5) perform device verification tests and 6) perform user validation tests. These files will be maintained in a controlled document system.
The modified controller is similar to the CE marked device but will allow the investigators to explore a wider range of electrical stimulation parameters such as different waveforms and higher frequencies. Our intention is to use up to 600 Hz frequencies, compared to the existing frequencies in this device of up to 53 Hz. These changes are modest and are well within the energy delivery provided by existing commercial neuromodulation systems such as spinal cord stimulation (typical parameters for spinal cord stimulation include the Nevro® system that delivers up to 10kHz). Patients both with and without posterior sacral rhizotomy will also be included. No further surgery is required. Measurements of bladder function will be made in the urodynamic laboratory.
The study is prospective and unblinded. Each participant will serve as their own control; outcome measures will be compared with different frequencies of electrical stimuli and with no electrical stimuli.
Study design
- Observational model
- Case only
- Time perspective
- Prospective
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Patients with clinically complete spinal cord injury who have undergone implantation of a Finetech Brindley Bladder Controller, with or without sacral posterior rhizotomy. John Radcliffe Hospital (Oxford), Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital (Stanmore) and Walton Centre (Liverpool) will be both patient identification centres and research sites for this study. Stoke Mandeville Hospital will be an additional patient identification centre, but studies on patients identified there will be conducted at Oxford as patients are generally under joint care between Stoke Mandeville Hospital and Oxford.
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Patients with clinically complete spinal cord injury who have undergone implantation of a Finetech Brindley Bladder controller, with or without sacral posterior rhizotomy.
- Male or female, aged 18 years or over.
- Patients willing and able to give informed consent to involvement in the study
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- External urethral sphincterotomy
- Patients are taking part in any studies on drugs or devices that alter bladder or autonomic function
- Any other significant comorbidity or illness that would preclude their participation or increase the risk to them of participating in the study
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Sacral Anterior Root Stimulation (SARS)Comparison of High frequency versus low frequency stimulation | Device | – |
Primary outcome
Bladder Pressure
Time frame: 2-3 hours
Urodynamics testing - High frequency SARS
Rectal Pressure
Time frame: 2-3 hours
Urodynamics- High frequency SARS
Detrusor Pressure
Time frame: 2-3 hours
Urodynamics- High frequency SARS
Sphincter Pressure
Time frame: 2-3 hours
Urodynamics1- High frequency SARS
Volume voided
Time frame: 2-3 hours
urodynamics- High frequency SARS
Post-void residual volume
Time frame: 2-3 hours
Urodynamics- High frequency SARS
Voiding Flow Rate
Time frame: 2-3 hours
Urodynamics- High frequency SARS
3 secondary outcomes
Bladder pressure
Time frame: 2-3 hours
Bladder Capacity
Time frame: 2-3 hours
Reflex incontinence
Time frame: 2-3 hours
Results and safety
The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 18 Nov 2025.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Bladder Dysfunction
Recruiting
Safety and Performance of UCon Patch Electrode
Urinary Incontinence, Urinary Incontinence, Urge
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Association of POCD With Circulating Biomarkers in Patients Undergoing TUR of Bladder Tumor
Cognitive Decline, Urinary Bladder Cancer
RecruitingPhase 2
A Proof-Of-Concept (POC) Study of SFG-02 Transdermal Formulation in Participants With Underactive Bladder (UAB)
Participants With Underactive Bladder (UAB)
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
Eribulin Mesylate in Treating Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Cancer of the Urothelium and Kidney Dysfunction
Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma, Locally Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma
Recruiting
Ambulatory Long Length URodynamics Evaluation
Urology, Urinary Bladder, Overactive
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Bladder Dysfunction and Spinal Cord Injuries, run by University of Oxford at 1 site in United Kingdom.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: withdrawn, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Nov 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Bladder Pressure (time frame: 2-3 hours). The study lists 7 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Nov 2025.