Chronic Low Back PainPhase 2NCT05935761
Investigating Novel Interventions for Low Back Pain in US Military Veterans: A Randomized Controlled Adaptive Phase II Trial
A Phase 2 study testing Pregnenolone and DHEA in people with Chronic Low Back Pain, run by VA Office of Research and Development at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
Chronic pain symptoms are very common among U.S. Military Veterans and have a profound negative impact on mental health symptoms and quality of life, in addition to increasing risk for suicidal ideation and suicidal behaviors. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Chronic Low Back Pain
- What is being tested?
- Pregnenolone and DHEA
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 108 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 1 Dec 2026to 31 Dec 2029
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Veterans with chronic low back pain
- Based on medical history and medical records, have low back pain (Thoracic Vertebrae 6 or below) present on most days for the preceding 6 months or longer, and fulfill all disease diagnostic criteria (please see disease diagnostic criteria below)
- Have a weekly mean of 24-hour average pain score 4 at baseline
- Negative pregnancy test if female. Sexually active subjects are required to use a medically acceptable form of birth control if they are of childbearing potential and could become pregnant during the study. A medically acceptable form of birth control includes non-hormonal intrauterine devices, surgical sterilization, or double barrier methods (e.g. diaphragm with contraceptive jelly, condom with contraceptive foam, cervical caps with contraceptive jelly). Sexual abstinence with agreement to continue abstinence or to use a medically acceptable method of contraception (as listed above) should sexual activity occur is permissible
- No change in medications less than 4 weeks before baseline
- No anticipated need to alter psychotropic or pain medications for the 6-wk study duration (as determined by study physician's review of records and/or discussion with prescribing physician)
- Ability to fully participate in the informed consent process
Who cannot join
- Unstable medical or neurological illness, including seizures, renal impairment or cerebral vascular accident (CVA)
- Use of oral contraceptives or other hormonal supplements-this is out of caution, as it is unknown if the study medications would impact the efficacy of hormonal contraception
- Significant suicidal or homicidal ideation that necessitates intervention
- Daily use of long or short-acting narcotic medications (PRN use will be considered)
- Current DSM-5 diagnosis of bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, or other psychotic disorder, or cognitive disorder due to a general medical condition
- Female participants who are pregnant or breast-feeding
Show all 13Show fewer
- Known allergy to study medication
- History of moderate or severe TBI (mild TBI is permissible)
- DSM-5 criteria met for alcohol and/or other substance abuse or dependence within past three months (excludes caffeine and nicotine)
- Have received epidural steroids, facet block, nerve block or other invasive procedures aimed to reduce low back pain within the past 3 months prior to Visit 1
- Have ongoing or anticipated disability compensation or litigation issues, in the best judgment of the investigator
- Have a presence of any factors/conditions, medical or other, that in the judgment of the investigator may interfere with performance of study outcome measures, such as treatment-refractory history
- Have serious or unstable cardiovascular, hepatic, renal, metabolic, respiratory, or hematologic illness, symptomatic peripheral vascular disease, or other medical condition or psychiatric conditions that, in the opinion of investigator and study physician, would compromise participation or be likely to lead to hospitalization during the study
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
United States1 site
Durham VA Medical Center, Durham, NC
Durham, North Carolina, 27705-3875
Jennifer C Naylor, PhD, (919) 286-0411 ext. 7722, jennifer.naylor2@va.gov
Christine E. Marx, MD MA
About this study
Chronic pain symptoms are very common among U.S. Military Veterans and have a profound negative impact on mental health symptoms and quality of life, in addition to increasing risk for suicidal ideation and suicidal behaviors. There are currently extremely few safe and effective pharmacological treatments for chronic pain disorders, and the clinical need to develop new therapeutics for pain has never been more urgent. Fueled by the worsening opioid crisis and further exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic, opioid and other drug overdose deaths have climbed to staggeringly high levels. The rapid development of medications for the management of chronic pain conditions that are safe, well-tolerated, efficacious and non-addicting is thus of paramount importance. The two neurosteroid candidates to be investigated in this trial are naturally occurring molecules enriched in human brain and potentially ideal candidates for safe and effective chronic pain treatment.
Read the detailed description
Pain is one of the most common reasons that Americans seek medical care, with more than 50 million Americans reporting pain that is chronic (CDC NHIS data) and almost 20 million Americans reporting high impact pain that affects major life activities (Nahin, 2015). Chronic pain conditions disproportionately impact U.S. Military Veterans, and back pain is one of the most common diagnoses among Iraq/Afghanistan-era Veterans. The often-debilitating sequelae of chronic low back pain profoundly impacts quality of life and function in a very large number of Veterans and is substantial risk factor for the development or worsening of depression, anxiety and suicidal ideation. Commonly used treatments for pain include long-term opioid use, which is frequently suboptimal and has played a substantial role in the recent surge of opioid-related addiction and deaths. Non-opioid pharmacological interventions that maximize analgesia and minimize adverse outcomes are thus of critical national importance.
Neurosteroids exhibit pleiotropic actions that are highly relevant to central nervous system conditions, including pain disorders. Both preclinical and clinical studies provide strong evidence for the role of neurosteroids in pain. Among other similar studies, the investigators' laboratory has also demonstrated that allopregnanolone levels are reduced in Veterans reporting low back pain and chest pain. Moreover, the recently completed randomized clinical trial (RCT) demonstrated that Veterans randomized to pregnenolone (an endogenous precursor of allopregnanolone) demonstrated significant reduction in low back pain compared to placebo (Naylor et al 2020). The highest dose of pregnenolone resulted in the greatest improvements in pain intensity ratings but the investigators' data suggested that higher doses of this molecule may be even more efficacious. Thus, an RCT to optimize dosing of pregnenolone is warranted. Furthermore, dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) is another neurosteroid that has been implicated in pain. The investigators' laboratory (and others) demonstrates that DHEA levels are generally inversely associated with pain and the preliminary data indicate that supplementation with DHEA is associated with a reduction in pain symptoms. Administration of DHEA could thus also represent a novel therapeutic intervention for chronic pain symptoms. The investigators therefore propose to utilize an efficient and informative adaptive trial design to evaluate the efficacy and safety of these two promising molecules for the treatment of chronic low back pain.
Specific Aim 1: To conduct a Phase II adaptive randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial with flexible dosing of pregnenolone, DHEA or placebo (1:1:1 randomization) to highest well-tolerated doses in 108 Veterans with chronic low back pain who served in the U.S. Military. Safety and efficacy will be determined for each chronic low back pain intervention over the course of 4 weeks (total study duration is 6 weeks). Hypothesis 1: Based on the investigators' previously published RCT showing that 500 mg of pregnenolone significantly reduces low back pain, it's hypothesize the investigators will replicate these positive findings with the pregnenolone 500 mg dosing strategy and that pregnenolone at higher doses of 1,000 mg and 2,000 mg per day will result in even greater improvements in low back pain Hypothesis 2: DHEA levels at baseline and post-treatment will predict therapeutic response and higher doses will result in greater improvement in low back pain. Hypothesis 3: Pregnenolone and DHEA will be safe and well-tolerated in this adaptive clinical trial design using flexible dosing.
Specific Aim 2: To conduct biomarker candidate investigations quantifying pregnenolone, DHEA and their neurosteroid metabolite levels (allopregnanolone, others) in serum at baseline, during treatment and post-treatment with pregnenolone and DHEA using highly sensitive and specific mass spectrometry-based methodologies (GC/MS/MS) in order to: a.) characterize the metabolic profile and pharmacokinetics of pregnenolone and DHEA and b.) identify predictors of therapeutic response (potentially yielding valuable dosing information and identifying windows of optimal therapeutic efficacy). Hypothesis: Based on the preliminary candidate biomarker data, the investigators hypothesize that changes in pregnenolone, pregnenolone metabolites, DHEA and DHEA metabolite levels post-treatment will be predictive of therapeutic response and identify optimal therapeutic ranges.
As chronic low back pain conditions significantly impact Veterans, there is an urgent need for the development of pharmacological treatments that are safe, efficacious and non-habit forming. The proposed adaptive platform RCT would thus provide pivotal evidence to optimize treatment in pain disorders for Veterans that could be easily translated to active duty and civilian populations. This RCT thus potentially represents a therapeutic breakthrough for the treatment of pain and may also have the added benefit of mitigating other commonly co-occurring symptoms.
- Conditions
- Chronic Low Back Pain
- Being tested
- Pregnenolone, DHEA, Placebo
- Keywords
- neurosteroid, pregnenolone, DHEA, Veteran, Pain, Back
- Medical subject headings
- Pain
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
PregnenoloneDrug
Pregnenolone dosing will begin at 500 milligrams (mg)/day x 7 days, and will increase by 500mg each following week as tolerated (to a potential maximum dose 2000mg/day).
DHEADrug
DHEA dosing will begin at 100 milligrams (mg)/day x 7 days, and will increase by 100mg each following week as tolerated (to a potential maximum dose 400mg/day).
PlaceboDrug
Same as active comparator arms, except placebo dispensed
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Pregnenolone | Active comparator | Pregnenolone dosing will begin at 500 milligrams (mg)/day x 7 days, and will increase by 500mg each following week as tolerated (to a potential maximum dose 2000mg/day). Receives: Drug: Pregnenolone |
| DHEA | Active comparator | DHEA dosing will begin at 100 milligrams (mg)/day x 7 days, and will increase by 100mg each following week as tolerated (to a potential maximum dose 400mg/day). Receives: Drug: DHEA |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Same as active comparator arms, except placebo dispensed Receives: Drug: Placebo |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Pain Numerical Rating Scale (0-10) Change
Weekly mean of the 24-hour average pain severity scores recorded daily on an 11-point numerical rating scale, an ordinal scale ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain).
Measured: Visit 1 (Week 1/screening), Visit 2 (Week 2/Randomization/Baseline), Visit 3 (Week 3), Visit 4 (Week 4), Visit 5 (Week 5), Visit 6 (Week 6)
Secondary outcomes (1)
Brief Pain Inventory (BPI)
The BPI is a self-reported scale that measures the severity of pain and the interference of pain on function. The scores range from 0 (no pain) to 10 (pain as severe as you can imagine). There are 4 questions assessing worst pain, least pain, average pain in the past 24 hours, and the pain right now. The Interference scores range from 0 (does not interfere) to 10 (completely interferes). There are 7 questions assessing the interference of pain in the past 24 hours for general activity, mood, walking ability, normal work, relations with other people, sleep, and enjoyment of life. Questions from the BPI will be asked at each study visit.
Measured: Visit 1 (Week 1/screening), Visit 2 (Week 2/Randomization/Baseline), Visit 3 (Week 3), Visit 4 (Week 4), Visit 5 (Week 5), Visit 6 (Week 6)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted7 Jul 2023
- Study start1 Dec 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completion1 Oct 2029 (estimated)
- Study completion31 Dec 2029 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Chronic Low Back PainStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by VA Office of Research and DevelopmentThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled trial.
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 108 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- VA Office of Research and Development
- Sponsor type
- US federal agency
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Jennifer C Naylor, PhD, Principal investigator, Durham VA Medical Center, Durham, NCChristine E. Marx, MD MA, Principal investigator, Durham VA Medical Center, Durham, NC
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05935761
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- NURP-004-22F
- Other IDs
- I01CX002667-01
- Status last verified
- Sep 2026
- First submitted
- 28 Jun 2023
- Last updated
- 8 Sep 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 8 Sep 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Investigating Novel Interventions for Low Back Pain in US Military Veterans: A Randomized Controlled Adaptive Phase II Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05935761
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- NURP-004-22F
- Conditions
- Chronic Low Back Pain
- Keywords
- neurosteroid, pregnenolone, DHEA, Veteran, Pain, Back
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Not yet recruiting
- Enrolment
- 108 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- VA Office of Research and DevelopmentUS federal agency
- Study start
- 1 Dec 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- 1 Oct 2029 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 31 Dec 2029 (estimated)
- First posted
- 7 Jul 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Chronic pain symptoms are very common among U.S. Military Veterans and have a profound negative impact on mental health symptoms and quality of life, in addition to increasing risk for suicidal ideation and suicidal behaviors. There are currently extremely few safe and effective pharmacological treatments for chronic pain disorders, and the clinical need to develop new therapeutics for pain has never been more urgent. Fueled by the worsening opioid crisis and further exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic, opioid and other drug overdose deaths have climbed to staggeringly high levels. The rapid development of medications for the management of chronic pain conditions that are safe, well-tolerated, efficacious and non-addicting is thus of paramount importance. The two neurosteroid candidates to be investigated in this trial are naturally occurring molecules enriched in human brain and potentially ideal candidates for safe and effective chronic pain treatment.
Detailed description
Pain is one of the most common reasons that Americans seek medical care, with more than 50 million Americans reporting pain that is chronic (CDC NHIS data) and almost 20 million Americans reporting high impact pain that affects major life activities (Nahin, 2015). Chronic pain conditions disproportionately impact U.S. Military Veterans, and back pain is one of the most common diagnoses among Iraq/Afghanistan-era Veterans. The often-debilitating sequelae of chronic low back pain profoundly impacts quality of life and function in a very large number of Veterans and is substantial risk factor for the development or worsening of depression, anxiety and suicidal ideation. Commonly used treatments for pain include long-term opioid use, which is frequently suboptimal and has played a substantial role in the recent surge of opioid-related addiction and deaths. Non-opioid pharmacological interventions that maximize analgesia and minimize adverse outcomes are thus of critical national importance.
Neurosteroids exhibit pleiotropic actions that are highly relevant to central nervous system conditions, including pain disorders. Both preclinical and clinical studies provide strong evidence for the role of neurosteroids in pain. Among other similar studies, the investigators' laboratory has also demonstrated that allopregnanolone levels are reduced in Veterans reporting low back pain and chest pain. Moreover, the recently completed randomized clinical trial (RCT) demonstrated that Veterans randomized to pregnenolone (an endogenous precursor of allopregnanolone) demonstrated significant reduction in low back pain compared to placebo (Naylor et al 2020). The highest dose of pregnenolone resulted in the greatest improvements in pain intensity ratings but the investigators' data suggested that higher doses of this molecule may be even more efficacious. Thus, an RCT to optimize dosing of pregnenolone is warranted. Furthermore, dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) is another neurosteroid that has been implicated in pain. The investigators' laboratory (and others) demonstrates that DHEA levels are generally inversely associated with pain and the preliminary data indicate that supplementation with DHEA is associated with a reduction in pain symptoms. Administration of DHEA could thus also represent a novel therapeutic intervention for chronic pain symptoms. The investigators therefore propose to utilize an efficient and informative adaptive trial design to evaluate the efficacy and safety of these two promising molecules for the treatment of chronic low back pain.
Specific Aim 1: To conduct a Phase II adaptive randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial with flexible dosing of pregnenolone, DHEA or placebo (1:1:1 randomization) to highest well-tolerated doses in 108 Veterans with chronic low back pain who served in the U.S. Military. Safety and efficacy will be determined for each chronic low back pain intervention over the course of 4 weeks (total study duration is 6 weeks). Hypothesis 1: Based on the investigators' previously published RCT showing that 500 mg of pregnenolone significantly reduces low back pain, it's hypothesize the investigators will replicate these positive findings with the pregnenolone 500 mg dosing strategy and that pregnenolone at higher doses of 1,000 mg and 2,000 mg per day will result in even greater improvements in low back pain Hypothesis 2: DHEA levels at baseline and post-treatment will predict therapeutic response and higher doses will result in greater improvement in low back pain. Hypothesis 3: Pregnenolone and DHEA will be safe and well-tolerated in this adaptive clinical trial design using flexible dosing.
Specific Aim 2: To conduct biomarker candidate investigations quantifying pregnenolone, DHEA and their neurosteroid metabolite levels (allopregnanolone, others) in serum at baseline, during treatment and post-treatment with pregnenolone and DHEA using highly sensitive and specific mass spectrometry-based methodologies (GC/MS/MS) in order to: a.) characterize the metabolic profile and pharmacokinetics of pregnenolone and DHEA and b.) identify predictors of therapeutic response (potentially yielding valuable dosing information and identifying windows of optimal therapeutic efficacy). Hypothesis: Based on the preliminary candidate biomarker data, the investigators hypothesize that changes in pregnenolone, pregnenolone metabolites, DHEA and DHEA metabolite levels post-treatment will be predictive of therapeutic response and identify optimal therapeutic ranges.
As chronic low back pain conditions significantly impact Veterans, there is an urgent need for the development of pharmacological treatments that are safe, efficacious and non-habit forming. The proposed adaptive platform RCT would thus provide pivotal evidence to optimize treatment in pain disorders for Veterans that could be easily translated to active duty and civilian populations. This RCT thus potentially represents a therapeutic breakthrough for the treatment of pain and may also have the added benefit of mitigating other commonly co-occurring symptoms.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 3
- Model description
- Randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled trial.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Pregnenolone | Active comparator | Drug: PregnenolonePregnenolone dosing will begin at 500 milligrams (mg)/day x 7 days, and will increase by 500mg each following week as tolerated (to a potential maximum dose 2000mg/day). |
| DHEA | Active comparator | Drug: DHEADHEA dosing will begin at 100 milligrams (mg)/day x 7 days, and will increase by 100mg each following week as tolerated (to a potential maximum dose 400mg/day). |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Drug: PlaceboSame as active comparator arms, except placebo dispensed |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 65 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Veterans with chronic low back pain
- Based on medical history and medical records, have low back pain (Thoracic Vertebrae 6 or below) present on most days for the preceding 6 months or longer, and fulfill all disease diagnostic criteria (please see disease diagnostic criteria below)
- Have a weekly mean of 24-hour average pain score 4 at baseline
- Negative pregnancy test if female. Sexually active subjects are required to use a medically acceptable form of birth control if they are of childbearing potential and could become pregnant during the study. A medically acceptable form of birth control includes non-hormonal intrauterine devices, surgical sterilization, or double barrier methods (e.g. diaphragm with contraceptive jelly, condom with contraceptive foam, cervical caps with contraceptive jelly). Sexual abstinence with agreement to continue abstinence or to use a medically acceptable method of contraception (as listed above) should sexual activity occur is permissible
- No change in medications less than 4 weeks before baseline
Key exclusion criteria (13 listed)
- Unstable medical or neurological illness, including seizures, renal impairment or cerebral vascular accident (CVA)
- Use of oral contraceptives or other hormonal supplements-this is out of caution, as it is unknown if the study medications would impact the efficacy of hormonal contraception
- Significant suicidal or homicidal ideation that necessitates intervention
- Daily use of long or short-acting narcotic medications (PRN use will be considered)
- Current DSM-5 diagnosis of bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, or other psychotic disorder, or cognitive disorder due to a general medical condition
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| PregnenolonePregnenolone dosing will begin at 500 milligrams (mg)/day x 7 days, and will increase by 500mg each following week as tolerated (to a potential maximum dose 2000mg/day). | Drug | Pregnenolone |
| DHEADHEA dosing will begin at 100 milligrams (mg)/day x 7 days, and will increase by 100mg each following week as tolerated (to a potential maximum dose 400mg/day). | Drug | DHEA |
| PlaceboSame as active comparator arms, except placebo dispensed | Drug | Placebo |
Primary outcome
Pain Numerical Rating Scale (0-10) Change
Time frame: Visit 1 (Week 1/screening), Visit 2 (Week 2/Randomization/Baseline), Visit 3 (Week 3), Visit 4 (Week 4), Visit 5 (Week 5), Visit 6 (Week 6)
Weekly mean of the 24-hour average pain severity scores recorded daily on an 11-point numerical rating scale, an ordinal scale ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain).
1 secondary outcome
Brief Pain Inventory (BPI)
Time frame: Visit 1 (Week 1/screening), Visit 2 (Week 2/Randomization/Baseline), Visit 3 (Week 3), Visit 4 (Week 4), Visit 5 (Week 5), Visit 6 (Week 6)
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 8 Sep 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Chronic Low Back Pain
Not yet recruiting
Effect of Lumbar Stabilization Exercises With and Without YTWL (Scapular Stabilization Exercises) on Reducing Chronic Low Back Pain and Related Disability. A Randomized Clinical Trial,
Chronic Non Specific Mechanical Low Back Pain
Not yet recruiting
Comparing Non-Medicine Strategies for Improving Low Back Pain
Chronic Low-back Pain (cLBP), High-Impact Chronic Pain (HICP)
Not yet recruiting
Spinery Basivertebral Nerve Ablation for Vertebrogenic Chronic Low Back Pain
Low Back Pain, Chronic Low Back Pain (CLBP)
Enrolling by invitation
Effects of 3-dimensional Versus Dynamic Myofascial Release Techniques With Lumbar Mobilization and Exercise Therapy Program in Chronic Non-specific Low Back Pain.
Chronic Non-Specific Low Back Pain, Myofascial Release
RecruitingPhase 2
A Master Protocol Study (LY900028) of Multiple Intervention-Specific-Appendices (ISAs) in Participants With Chronic Pain
Osteoarthritis, Knee, Diabetic Neuropathic Pain
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Jennifer C Naylor, PhD principal investigator
Durham VA Medical Center, Durham, NC
Christine E. Marx, MD MA principal investigator
Durham VA Medical Center, Durham, NC
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Pregnenolone and DHEA in people with Chronic Low Back Pain, run by VA Office of Research and Development at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 13 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Sep 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Jennifer C Naylor, PhD ((919) 286-0411 ext. 7722, jennifer.naylor2@va.gov), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Pain Numerical Rating Scale (0-10) Change (time frame: Visit 1 (Week 1/screening), Visit 2 (Week 2/Randomization/Baseline), Visit 3 (Week 3), Visit 4 (Week 4), Visit 5 (Week 5), Visit 6 (Week 6)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Sep 2026.