AzTrials
AzTrials

Attention Deficit and Hyperactivity DisorderNCT05935254

Plaque Removal Efficacy of Electric Toothbrushes in ADHD

A study testing Plaque removal efficacy of children's electric toothbrush (Oral-B D100 Vitality; Procter & Gamble, Cincinnati, OH, United States) and Plaque removal efficacy of children's soft manual toothbrush (Oral-B Stages 6-12 years; Procter & Gamble, Cincinnati, OH, United States) in people with Attention Deficit and Hyperactivity Disorder and Dental Plaque, run by Aydin Adnan Menderes University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

A total of 52 children, 26 of whom were diagnosed with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) as the experimental group and 26 healthy with no systemic disease as the control group, were included in the study. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 8 to 10 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
What is being tested?
Plaque removal efficacy of children's electric toothbrush (Oral-B D100 Vitality; Procter & Gamble, Cincinnati, OH, United States) and Plaque removal efficacy of children's soft manual toothbrush (Oral-B Stages 6-12 years; Procter & Gamble, Cincinnati, OH, United States)
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
52 participants
Where
1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
Study dates
29 Jan 2022to 15 Dec 2022
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 8 to 10 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Child

Who may be able to join

  • Having not had oral prophylaxis in the last 1 month
  • Taking not antibiotics within the last 1 month
  • Having not had severe periodontal disease and dental caries
  • Having no pain symptoms due to caries in any of their teeth,
  • Not using any orthodontic appliances
  • Not using an electric toothbrush before
  • Having at least 16 teeth in the mouth

Who cannot join

  • Have a complex medical history
  • Have psychiatric illness other than attention deficit and hyperactivity disorder

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Turkey (Türkiye)1 site
  • Aydın Adnan Menderes University Faculty of Dentistry Department of Pediatric Dentistry

    Aydin, 09100

Other trials in Turkey (Türkiye)

About this study

Official title: Comparative Evaluation of Plaque Removal Efficacy of Electric Toothbrushes Between Children With Attention Deficit And Hyperactivity Disorder And Healthy Children

A total of 52 children, 26 of whom were diagnosed with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) as the experimental group and 26 healthy with no systemic disease as the control group, were included in the study. Then, in order to evaluate the effectiveness of electric and manual toothbrushes, each group was randomly divided into 2 subgroups: Electric and Manual. Children were educated on toothbrushing according to subgroups. DMFT/dft and Löe-Silness Gingival Index (GI) values were recorded. At the first appointment, plaque disclosing was performed and Turesky modification of Quigley-Hein Plaque Index (TQHPI) and Approximal Plaque Index (API) values were recorded to determine the amount of dental plaque before the brushing. Subsequently, children brushed their teeth for 2 minutes with the subgroup's toothbrush type. Then, plaque disclosing and measurements were repeated to determine the amount of plaque removal after brushing. The same procedure steps were repeated at the 1st and 3rd-month appointments, respectively. a p-value below 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Read the detailed description

A total of 52 children, 26 of whom were diagnosed with ADHD, as the experimental group and 26 of whom were healthy, as the control group, were included in the study. Intraoral examination of the children was performed in a dental chair. Standard coding systems and tools developed by the World Health Organization were used to collect data in calculating the criteria for oral health. Soft tissues, tongue, cheek, and palate area were checked in each examination period. Intraoral examination was performed carefully, from the distal right maxillary molars to the most distal right mandibular molars. If there was no cavitation with white spot lesions and black/dark and bright discolorations were considered healthy. According to the DMFT index (Decayed, Missing, and Filled Teeth Index) with the obtained records, DMFT values for permanent teeth and dft values for primary teeth were calculated.

Randomization of the patients to determine the subgroups was carried out by the physician who performed the first examination (B.M.A) using a computer program called www.Random.org (Randomness and Integrity Services Ltd., Ireland). In order to evaluate the effectiveness of electric and manual toothbrushes, each group was divided into 2 subgroups according to the types of brush (electric and manual). There are a total of 4 subgroups in the study. In the manual toothbrush subgroups, the children had a demonstration of how to brush with the Bass Technique on the model. The electric toothbrush subgroups had a demonstration about how to brush their teeth with an electric toothbrush according to the manufacturer's instructions on the model. During the study, children brushed their teeth at home under parental supervision. It is instructed to brush teeth for 2 minutes 2 times a day. During the study period, Sensodyne Promine Kids (GlaxoSmithKline Brazil Ltda, Jacarepagua, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil) were given to children. In both the experimental and control groups and their parents had received instruction to avoid oral hygiene procedures such as flossing and using mouthwash during the study period, except tooth brushing.

After randomization, at the first appointment, Löe-Silness Gingival Index values were recorded in all fully erupted permanent teeth and primary teeth without exfoliation. In order to determine the amount of dental plaque before the first brushing, Mira-2-Ton Plaque Staining Solution (Hager Werken, Germany) was applied to the labial and lingual surfaces of all teeth with a micro brush, and then the children were asked to rinse their mouths with water for 30 seconds. After plaque discoloration, the Approximal Plaque Index and the Turesky Modification of Quigley-Hein Plaque Index values were recorded. The children brushed their teeth in front of a mirror for 2 minutes with the toothbrushes according to subgroups, under the supervision of a physician who was not included in the study. To determine the amount of plaque removal after the first brushing, plaque discoloration was performed again. The Turesky modification of the Quigley-Hein Plaque Index and the Approximal Plaque Index measurements were recorded. The same procedures were repeated to evaluate the brushing habits at the 1st-month and 3rd-month, respectively.

Being tested
Plaque removal efficacy of children's electric toothbrush (Oral-B D100 Vitality; Procter & Gamble, Cincinnati, OH, United States), Plaque removal efficacy of children's soft manual toothbrush (Oral-B Stages 6-12 years; Procter & Gamble, Cincinnati, OH, United States)
Medical subject headings
Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Dental Plaque

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Plaque removal efficacy of children's electric toothbrush (Oral-B D100 Vitality; Procter & Gamble, Cincinnati, OH, United States)Device

    At the baseline appointment, Löe-Silness Gingival Index values were recorded in all fully erupted permanent teeth and primary teeth without exfoliation. Mira-2-Ton Plaque Staining Solution was applied to the labial and lingual surfaces of all teeth with a micro brush to determine the amount of dental plaque before the first brushing. After plaque discoloration, the Approximal Plaque Index and the Turesky Modification of Quigley-Hein Plaque Index values were recorded. The children brushed their teeth with an electric toothbrush for 2 minutes, under the supervision of a physician who was not included in the study. Plaque discoloration was performed again to determine the amount of plaque removal after the first brushing. Approximal Plaque Index and The Turesky modification of the Quigley-Hein Plaque Index the measurements were recorded. The same procedures were repeated to evaluate the brushing habits at the 1st-month and 3rd-month, respectively.

  • Plaque removal efficacy of children's soft manual toothbrush (Oral-B Stages 6-12 years; Procter & Gamble, Cincinnati, OH, United States)Device

    At the baseline appointment, Löe-Silness Gingival Index values were recorded in all fully erupted permanent teeth and primary teeth without exfoliation. Mira-2-Ton Plaque Staining Solution was applied to the labial and lingual surfaces of all teeth with a micro brush to determine the amount of dental plaque before the first brushing. After plaque discoloration, the Approximal Plaque Index and the Turesky Modification of Quigley-Hein Plaque Index values were recorded. The children brushed their teeth with a manual toothbrush for 2 minutes, under the supervision of a physician who was not included in the study. Plaque discoloration was performed again to determine the amount of plaque removal after the first brushing. Approximal Plaque Index and The Turesky modification of the Quigley-Hein Plaque Index the measurements were recorded. The same procedures were repeated to evaluate the brushing habits at the 1st-month and 3rd-month, respectively.

Study groups in NCT05935254
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
ADHD-Electric Toothbrush GroupExperimentalChildren aged 8-10 years who were diagnosed with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) according to DSM-5 criteria, who applied to Aydın Adnan Menderes University Faculty of Medicine Child Psychiatry Clinic, were randomly assigned to the electric toothbrush group.
Receives: Device: Plaque removal efficacy of children's electric toothbrush (Oral-B D100 Vitality; Procter & Gamble, Cincinnati, OH, United States)
ADHD-Manual Toothbrush GroupExperimentalChildren aged 8-10 years who were diagnosed with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) according to DSM-5 criteria, who applied to Aydın Adnan Menderes University Faculty of Medicine Child Psychiatry Clinic, were randomly assigned to the manual toothbrush group.
Receives: Device: Plaque removal efficacy of children's soft manual toothbrush (Oral-B Stages 6-12 years; Procter & Gamble, Cincinnati, OH, United States)
Healthy- Electric Toothbrush GroupActive comparatorAmong the physically and psychologically healthy children aged 8-10 who applied to the Pediatric Dentistry Clinic of ADU Faculty of Dentistry, those assigned to the electric toothbrush group as a result of randomization
Receives: Device: Plaque removal efficacy of children's electric toothbrush (Oral-B D100 Vitality; Procter & Gamble, Cincinnati, OH, United States)
Healthy- Manual Toothbrush GroupActive comparatorAmong the physically and psychologically healthy children aged 8-10 who applied to the Pediatric Dentistry Clinic of ADU Faculty of Dentistry, those assigned to the manual toothbrush group as a result of randomization
Receives: Device: Plaque removal efficacy of children's soft manual toothbrush (Oral-B Stages 6-12 years; Procter & Gamble, Cincinnati, OH, United States)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Determination of Gingival Index (GI) values

    Evaluation of children's gingival health during the study period

    Measured: The measurements will be done before the intervention at baseline

  2. Determination of Gingival Index (GI) values

    Evaluation of children's gingival health during the study period

    Measured: The measurements will be done before the intervention at 1st month

  3. Determination of Gingival Index (GI) values

    Evaluation of children's gingival health during the study period

    Measured: The measurements will be done before the intervention at 3rd month

  4. Determination of Turesky modification of Quigley-Hein Plaque Index (TQHPI) values

    Evaluation of plaque removal efficiency from labial and lingual surfaces of teeth with a toothbrush

    Measured: The measurements will be done immediately before the intervention at baseline

  5. Determination of Turesky modification of Quigley-Hein Plaque Index (TQHPI) values

    Evaluation of plaque removal efficiency from labial and lingual surfaces of teeth with a toothbrush

    Measured: The measurements will be done immediately after the intervention at baseline

  6. Determination of Turesky modification of Quigley-Hein Plaque Index (TQHPI) values

    Evaluation of plaque removal efficiency from labial and lingual surfaces of teeth with a toothbrush

    Measured: The measurements will be done immediately before the intervention at 1st month

  7. Determination of Turesky modification of Quigley-Hein Plaque Index (TQHPI) values

    Evaluation of plaque removal efficiency from labial and lingual surfaces of teeth with a toothbrush

    Measured: The measurements will be done immediately after the intervention at 1st month

  8. Determination of Turesky modification of Quigley-Hein Plaque Index (TQHPI) values

    Evaluation of plaque removal efficiency from labial and lingual surfaces of teeth with a toothbrush

    Measured: The measurements will be done immediately before the intervention at 3rd month

  9. Determination of Turesky modification of Quigley-Hein Plaque Index (TQHPI) values

    Evaluation of plaque removal efficiency from labial and lingual surfaces of teeth with a toothbrush

    Measured: The measurements will be done immediately after the intervention at 3rd month

  10. Determination of Approximal Plaque Index (API) values

    Evaluation of plaque removal efficiency from proximal surfaces of teeth with a toothbrush

    Measured: The measurements will be done immediately before the intervention at baseline

  11. Determination of Approximal Plaque Index (API) values

    Evaluation of plaque removal efficiency from proximal surfaces of teeth with a toothbrush

    Measured: The measurements will be done immediately after the intervention at baseline

  12. Determination of Approximal Plaque Index (API) values

    Evaluation of plaque removal efficiency from proximal surfaces of teeth with a toothbrush

    Measured: The measurements will be done immediately before the intervention at 1st month

  13. Determination of Approximal Plaque Index (API) values

    Evaluation of plaque removal efficiency from proximal surfaces of teeth with a toothbrush

    Measured: The measurements will be done immediately after the intervention at 1st month

  14. Determination of Approximal Plaque Index (API) values

    Evaluation of plaque removal efficiency from proximal surfaces of teeth with a toothbrush

    Measured: The measurements will be done immediately before the intervention at 3rd month

  15. Determination of Approximal Plaque Index (API) values

    Evaluation of plaque removal efficiency from proximal surfaces of teeth with a toothbrush

    Measured: The measurements will be done immediately after the intervention at 3rd month

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. Determination of the DMFT Index (Decayed, Missing and filled Teeth Index) of the subgroups

    To determine the risk of dental caries in the permanent dentition period of children during the study period.

    Measured: Baseline

  2. Determination of the DMFT Index (Decayed, Missing and filled Teeth Index) of the subgroups

    To determine the risk of dental caries in the permanent dentition period of children during the study period.

    Measured: 3rd Month

  3. Determination of the dft Index (decay filled teeth index) of the subgroups

    To determine the risk of dental caries in the primary dentition of children during the study period.

    Measured: Baseline

  4. Determination of the dft Index (decay filled teeth index) of the subgroups

    To determine the risk of dental caries in the primary dentition of children during the study period.

    Measured: 3rd Month

  5. A questionnaire consisting of 19 questions that all children participating in the study could answer with their parents.

    To determine of nutrition, diet, and tooth brushing habits of children and sociodemographic factors

    Measured: Baseline

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted7 Jul 2023
  2. Study start29 Jan 2022
  3. Primary completion20 Sep 2022
  4. Study completion15 Dec 2022

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Investigator
Enrolment
52 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05935254
Sponsor's protocol ID
AdnanMU-ZUCAR.001
Status last verified
Jul 2023
First submitted
6 Mar 2023
Last updated
7 Jul 2023
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Polanczyk GV, Salum GA, Sugaya LS, Caye A, Rohde LA. Annual research review: A meta-analysis of the worldwide prevalence of mental disorders in children and adolescents. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2015 Mar;56(3):345-65. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.12381. Epub 2015 Feb 3.

    PubMed 25649325
  • Drumond VZ, Souza GLN, Pereira MJC, Mesquita RA, Amin M, Abreu LG. Dental Caries in Children with Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: A Meta-Analysis. Caries Res. 2022;56(1):3-14. doi: 10.1159/000521142. Epub 2021 Dec 20.

    PubMed 34929707
  • Paszynska E, Krahel A, Pawinska M, Dmitrzak-Weglarz M, Perczak A, Slopien A, Gawriolek M. Management for Caries Prevention in ADHD Children. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jun 17;19(12):7455. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19127455.

    PubMed 35742701
  • Atmetlla G, Burgos V, Carrillo A, Chaskel R. Behavior and orofacial characteristics of children with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder during a dental visit. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2006 Spring;30(3):183-90. doi: 10.17796/jcpd.30.3.g66h2750h11242p6.

    PubMed 16683663
  • Pirila-Parkkinen K, Pirttiniemi P, Nieminen P, Tolonen U, Pelttari U, Lopponen H. Dental arch morphology in children with sleep-disordered breathing. Eur J Orthod. 2009 Apr;31(2):160-7. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjn061. Epub 2008 Nov 20.

    PubMed 19028674
  • Andersson H, Sonnesen L. Sleepiness, occlusion, dental arch and palatal dimensions in children attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2018 Apr;19(2):91-97. doi: 10.1007/s40368-018-0330-3. Epub 2018 Mar 14.

    PubMed 29542042
  • Avsar A, Akbas S, Ataibis T. Traumatic dental injuries in children with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Dent Traumatol. 2009 Oct;25(5):484-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-9657.2009.00792.x. Epub 2009 Jun 1.

    PubMed 19496799
  • Blomqvist M, Holmberg K, Fernell E, Dahllof G. A retrospective study of dental behavior management problems in children with attention and learning problems. Eur J Oral Sci. 2004 Oct;112(5):406-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0722.2004.00150.x.

    PubMed 15458498
  • Sujlana A, Dang R. Dental care for children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. J Dent Child (Chic). 2013 May-Aug;80(2):67-70.

    PubMed 24011294
  • Marsh PD. Dental plaque: biological significance of a biofilm and community life-style. J Clin Periodontol. 2005;32 Suppl 6:7-15. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2005.00790.x.

    PubMed 16128825
  • Nishihara T, Koseki T. Microbial etiology of periodontitis. Periodontol 2000. 2004;36:14-26. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0757.2004.03671.x. No abstract available.

    PubMed 15330940
  • Schmidt JC, Zaugg C, Weiger R, Walter C. Brushing without brushing?--a review of the efficacy of powered toothbrushes in noncontact biofilm removal. Clin Oral Investig. 2013 Apr;17(3):687-709. doi: 10.1007/s00784-012-0836-8. Epub 2012 Sep 23.

    PubMed 23001187
  • Turgut MD, Keceli TI, Tezel B, Cehreli ZC, Dolgun A, Tekcicek M. Number, length and end-rounding quality of bristles in manual child and adult toothbrushes. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2011 May;21(3):232-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-263X.2010.01102.x. Epub 2010 Oct 21.

    PubMed 20961341
  • Slot DE, Wiggelinkhuizen L, Rosema NA, Van der Weijden GA. The efficacy of manual toothbrushes following a brushing exercise: a systematic review. Int J Dent Hyg. 2012 Aug;10(3):187-97. doi: 10.1111/j.1601-5037.2012.00557.x. Epub 2012 Jun 6.

    PubMed 22672101
  • Thomassen TMJA, Van der Weijden FGA, Slot DE. The efficacy of powered toothbrushes: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. Int J Dent Hyg. 2022 Feb;20(1):3-17. doi: 10.1111/idh.12563. Epub 2021 Dec 31.

    PubMed 34877772

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Plaque removal efficacy of children's electric toothbrush (Oral-B D100 Vitality; Procter & Gamble, Cincinnati, OH, United States) and Plaque removal efficacy of children's soft manual toothbrush (Oral-B Stages 6-12 years; Procter & Gamble, Cincinnati, OH, United States) in people with Attention Deficit and Hyperactivity Disorder and Dental Plaque, run by Aydin Adnan Menderes University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 Jul 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Determination of Gingival Index (GI) values (time frame: The measurements will be done before the intervention at baseline). The study lists 15 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05935254, which also lists 49 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 Jul 2023.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in