Alzheimer DiseaseLIGHT4LIFENCT05926011
Efficacy of RGn600 in Patients With Mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's Disease
A study testing RGn600 in people with Alzheimer Disease, run by REGEnLIFE SAS at 7 sites in France.
Trial summary
This is a controlled investigation, with randomization of the patients, which aims at demonstrating the efficacy of device RGn600 in treating patients with mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's disease (AD). RGn600 is a non-invasive medical device which is applied on the head (helmet) and on the abdomen (abdominal belt). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 55 to 85 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Alzheimer Disease
- What is being tested?
- RGn600
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 108 participants
- Where
- 7 sitesFrance
- Study dates
- 24 Jul 2023to Dec 2027
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 55 to 85 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Male or female aged 55 to 85 years old (both included)
- Diagnosed with AD according to McKhann et al. international criteria dated 2011
- With mild-to-moderate AD, i.e., 10 ≤ MMSE score ≤ 26
- With blood analyses results (for: thyroid-stimulating hormone, vitamin B12, folate, complete blood count including platelets, electrolytes including calcium, creatinine, clearance, alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, bilirubin, coagulation, C-reactive protein) dated less than 1 year ago in line with AD diagnosis, as deemed by the investigator
- With brain Computed Tomography (CT) or/and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) scan dated less than 1 year ago in line with AD diagnosis, as deemed by the investigator
- In case of treatment with AD symptomatic treatments (memantine and acetylcholinesterase inhibitors) and psychotropic treatments (anxiolytics, antidepressants and neuroleptics): with a stable dose of such treatments 4 weeks before inclusion
Show all 9Show fewer
- Who has a caregiver who is sufficiently and regularly present and can help the patient throughout the investigation, as deemed by the investigator
- Affiliated to French social security
- Who provided, with his/her caregiver, a dated and signed informed consent form.
Who cannot join
- Patient protected by a French legal measure ("sauvegarde de justice", "tutelle" or "curatelle")
- Patient deprived of liberty or hospitalized without consent
- Non-menopausal woman
- Patient taking a disease-modifying treatment such as the Leqembi® or any other disease-modifying treatment that may be authorized in France before the end of the study
- Patient living in a medical facility
- Patient who experienced a surgery at the treatment application area (abdomen or head) within 3 months prior inclusion
Show all 20Show fewer
- Patient with skin lesions on the treatment application area (abdomen or head)
- Patient with a short-term life-threatening pathology (e.g., evolving cancer; non-stable heart failure; severe hepatic, renal or respiratory failure, etc.)
- Patient diagnosed with a stroke within 3 months prior inclusion
- Patients with ferromagnetic material (i.e., iron, nickel, cobalt or any metal alloy) on or near the head or abdomen, or implanted with a pacemaker
- Patient with a risk of epileptic seizure
- Patient with a genetic form of AD
- Patient with major physical or neurosensorial disorders that may interfere with neurological assessments
- Patient with chronic psychosis or psychotic episodes
- Patient addicted to alcohol or drugs
- Patient with known and non-supplemented vitamin B12 and folic acid deficiencies
- Patient with known untreated hypothyroidism
- Patient who participated to another investigation/study involving the use of an investigational medical device/drug within the 30 days prior inclusion
- Patient not able to meet treatment sessions as deemed by the investigator
- Patient not able to complete requested investigation assessments as deemed by the investigator.
Trial locations and contacts
7 sites in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
7 sites in 1 country
France7 sites, 7 recruiting
- Recruiting
CHIC Castres Mazamet Site Autan
Castres, 81100
Marie-Noëlle Cufi, Geriatrician, marie-noelle.cufi@chic-cm.fr
- Recruiting
CH Lavaur
Lavaur, 81500
Louise Naccache, Geriatrician, l.naccache@ch-lavaur.fr
- Recruiting
Hôpital Lariboisière
Paris, 75010
Claire PAQUET, Neurologist, claire.paquet@aphp.fr
- Recruiting
Hôpital Broca
Paris, 75013
Marie Laure SEUX, Geriatrician, marie-laure.seux@aphp.fr
- Recruiting
Biofortis
Saint-Herblain, 44800
Maud JOURDAIN, General practitioner, maud.jourdain@biofortis.fr
- Recruiting
Toulouse University Hospital Gerontopole
Toulouse, 31 000
Julien DELRIEU, Neurologist-Geriatrician, +33 5 61 77 70 58, delrieu.j@chu-toulouse.fr
- Recruiting
Hôpital des Charpennes - HCL
Villeurbanne, 69100
Antoine GARNIER-CRUSSARD, Geriatrician, antoine.garnier-crussard@chu-lyon.fr
About this study
Official title: Efficacy of RGn600 in Patients With Mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's Disease: a Pivotal, Sham-controlled, Randomized, Double-blind, Multicentric Investigation (LIGHT4LIFE)
This is a controlled investigation, with randomization of the patients, which aims at demonstrating the efficacy of device RGn600 in treating patients with mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's disease (AD). RGn600 is a non-invasive medical device which is applied on the head (helmet) and on the abdomen (abdominal belt). It combines 2 technologies:
- PhotoBioModulation (PBM), which involves exposure to light from the red to near-infrared wavelengths using lasers and Light Emitting Diodes (LEDs)
- Static Magnetic Stimulation (SMS), which consists in the application of a static magnetic field.
Considering previous investigations, this innovative technology could reduce inflammation on the brain-gut axis, implicated in the development of Alzheimer's disease.
Read the detailed description
This multicentric investigation is planned to include 108 patients in France who will be followed up to 52 weeks.
Patients meeting all eligibility criteria will be randomized on a 1: 1 ratio into one of the two following treatment groups: active RGn600 device or sham device (inactivated RGn600). The site investigation teams and patients/caregivers will be blinded. The device will be applied to the patients during 26 weeks through 20-min onsite sessions following the below pattern:
- 5 treatment sessions per week from Week 1 (W1) to W8
- 3 treatment sessions per week from W9 to W16
- 2 treatment sessions per week from W17 to W26 Throughout the investigation, patients will be treated per randomization with the device initially allocated by the IWRS.
Follow-up will continue up to W52 ± 2 weeks
At inclusion visit, after verification of the eligibility criteria, data regarding patients will be collected: demographic data, date of AD diagnosis, comorbidities, concomitant medications, sociological data. A blood sample for APOE genotyping will be also performed.
Endpoints will be evaluated during 4 onsite visits at Day 0 (Inclusion, randomization to the active or sham group and first treatment session), W8 (last treatment session of), W26 (last treatment session of) and W52 ± 2 weeks. During these visits:
- Patient's cognition and autonomy will be assessed through neurological scales and/or neuropsychological tests
- Patient's quality of life and medico-economic interest of RGn600 treatment with regards to healthcare consumption will be assessed through questionnaires fulfilled by the patient himself/herself with the help of his/her caregiver
- The safety of RGn600 will be assessed : collection of all AEs and device deficiencies, blood samples for safety analysis, clinical exams
Within the context of this investigation, a biobank will be created based on blood, fecal and saliva samples of patients included by Toulouse University Hospital Gerontopole site:
- Blood samples will be collected for all patients included by this site (at D0, W26 and W52)
- Fecal samples will be collected for the first 30 consecutive patients included by this site (at D0, W26 and W52).
- Saliva samples will be collected for the patients included by this site after the substantial modification approval (at D0, W26 and W52).
The biobank will be located at the site. The objective of this biobank will be to perform subsequent analysis on blood samples of AD blood markers. Other analyses might be conducted on blood, fecal and saliva samples as well such as Inflammatory blood markers (iAGE), fecal microbiota and metabolome and salivary micro RiboNucleic Acid (microRNAs)
- Conditions
- Alzheimer Disease
- Being tested
- RGn600, RGn600 Sham
- Keywords
- Alzheimer, Neurostimulation, Optics and photonics, Photobiomodulation, Brain Diseases, Central Nervous System Diseases, Nervous System Diseases, Medical Device
- Medical subject headings
- Alzheimer Disease, Brain Diseases, Central Nervous System Diseases, Nervous System Diseases
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
RGn600Device
RGn600 with a 10 Hz-pulsed wave mode light emission
RGn600 ShamDevice
RGn600 inactivated
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Active RGn600 | Experimental | RGn600 with a 10 Hz-pulsed wave mode light emission Receives: Device: RGn600 |
| Sham | Sham comparator | Inactivated RGn600 Receives: Device: RGn600 Sham |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Evolution of patient's cognition between Day 0 and Week 26 as measured with the AD Assessment Scale-cognitive subscale (ADAS-cog) score
Absolute change (Week 26-Day 0) in ADAS-cog score
Measured: Day 0, Week 26
Secondary outcomes (30)
Evolution of patient's cognition from Day 0 to Week 8, from Day 0 to Week 52 and from Week 26 to Week 52 as measured with the AD Assessment Scale-cognitive subscale (ADAS-cog) score
Measured: Day 0, Week 8, Week 26, Week 52
Evolution from Day 0 to Week 26 and from Day 0 to Week 52 of patient's cognitive functions
Evolution of the score of the Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE)
Measured: Day 0, Week 26, Week 52
Evolution from Day 0 to Week 26 and from Day 0 to Week 52 of patient's cognitive functions
Evolution of the score of the Category Naming Test (CNT)
Measured: Day 0, Week 26, Week 52
Evolution from Day 0 to Week 26 and from Day 0 to Week 52 of patient's cognitive functions
Evolution of the scores of the Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST)
Measured: Day 0, Week 26, Week 52
Evolution from Day 0 to Week 26 and from Day 0 to Week 52 of patient's cognitive functions
Evolution of the score of the Trail Making Test part A and B (TMT A \& B)
Measured: Day 0, Week 26, Week 52
Evolution from Day 0 to Week 26 and from Day 0 to Week 52 of patient's cognitive functions
Evolution of the score of the Clinical Dementia Rating - Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB) scale
Measured: Day 0, Week 26, Week 52
Evolution from Day 0 to Week 26 and from Day 0 to Week 52 of patient's cognitive functions
Evolution of the score of the AD Composite Score (ADCOMS)
Measured: Day 0, Week 26, Week 52
Evolution from Day 0 to Week 26 and from Day 0 to Week 52 of patient's cognitive functions
Evolution of the score of the Digit span test
Measured: Day 0, Week 26, Week 52
Evolution from Day 0 to Week 26 and from Day 0 to Week 52 of patient's autonomy
Evolution of the Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL) questionnaire score
Measured: Day 0, Week 26, Week 52
Evolution from Day 0 to Week 26 and from Day 0 to Week 52 of patient's Overall clinical response
Evolution of the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) scale score
Measured: Day 0, Week 26, Week 52
Evolution from Day 0 to Week 26 and from Day 0 to Week 52 of patient's Quality of life
Evolution of the EuroQoL 5 Dimensions-5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) score
Measured: Day 0, Week 26, Week 52
Incidence of Adverse Events (AEs)
Proportion of subjects with at least one Adverse Event (AE)
Measured: Throughout the investigation (from Day 0 to Week 52)
Incidence of RGn600's Adverse Device Effects (ADEs)
Proportion of subjects with at least one Adverse Device Effect (ADE)
Measured: Throughout the investigation (from Day 0 to Week 52)
Incidence of RGn600's Device Deficiencies (DDs)
Proportion of subjects with at least one Device Deficiency (DD)
Measured: Throughout the investigation (from Day 0 to Week 52)
Evolution from Day 0 to Week 8, Day 0 to Week 26 and from Day 0 to Week 52 of level of safety blood markers
Change from baseline (Day 0) of level of Complete blood count, including platelets
Measured: Day 0, Week 8, Week 26, Week 52
Evolution from Day 0 to Week 8, Day 0 to Week 26 and from Day 0 to Week 52 of level of safety blood markers
Change from baseline (Day 0) of level of electrolytes, including calcium
Measured: Day 0, Week 8, Week 26, Week 52
Evolution from Day 0 to Week 8, Day 0 to Week 26 and from Day 0 to Week 52 of level of safety blood markers
Change from baseline (Day 0) of level of Creatinine
Measured: Day 0, Week 8, Week 26, Week 52
Evolution from Day 0 to Week 8, Day 0 to Week 26 and from Day 0 to Week 52 of level of safety blood markers
Change from baseline (Day 0) of level of creatinine clearance
Measured: Day 0, Week 8, Week 26, Week 52
Evolution from Day 0 to Week 8, Day 0 to Week 26 and from Day 0 to Week 52 of level of safety blood markers
Change from baseline (Day 0) of level of urea
Measured: Day 0, Week 8, Week 26, Week 52
Evolution from Day 0 to Week 8, Day 0 to Week 26 and from Day 0 to Week 52 of level of safety blood markers
Change from baseline (Day 0) of level of ASpartate AminoTransferase (ASAT)
Measured: Day 0, Week 8, Week 26, Week 52
Evolution from Day 0 to Week 8, Day 0 to Week 26 and from Day 0 to Week 52 of level of safety blood markers
Change from baseline (Day 0) of level of ALanine AminoTransferase (ALAT)
Measured: Day 0, Week 8, Week 26, Week 52
Evolution from Day 0 to Week 8, Day 0 to Week 26 and from Day 0 to Week 52 of level of safety blood markers
Change from baseline (Day 0) of level of Gamma-GT
Measured: Day 0, Week 8, Week 26, Week 52
Evolution from Day 0 to Week 8, Day 0 to Week 26 and from Day 0 to Week 52 of level of safety blood markers
Change from baseline (Day 0) of level of ALkalyne Phosphatase (ALP)
Measured: Day 0, Week 8, Week 26, Week 52
Evolution from Day 0 to Week 8, Day 0 to Week 26 and from Day 0 to Week 52 of level of safety blood markers
Change from baseline (Day 0) of level of bilirubin
Measured: Day 0, Week 8, Week 26, Week 52
Evolution from Day 0 to Week 8, Day 0 to Week 26 and from Day 0 to Week 52 of Blood pressure
Measure of Blood pressure (mmHg)
Measured: Day 0, Week 8, Week 26, Week 52
Evolution from Day 0 to Week 8, Day 0 to Week 26 and from Day 0 to Week 52 of Weight
Measure of Weight (Kg)
Measured: Day 0, Week 8, Week 26, Week 52
Evolution from Day 0 to Week 8, Day 0 to Week 26 and from Day 0 to Week 52 of Heart rate
Measure of Heart rate (beats/min)
Measured: Day 0, Week 8, Week 26, Week 52
Evolution from Day 0 to Week 8, Day 0 to Week 26 and from Day 0 to Week 52 of Temperature
Measure of Temperature (°C)
Measured: Day 0, Week 8, Week 26, Week 52
Evolution from Day 0 to Week 8, Day 0 to Week 26 and from Day 0 to Week 52 of ElectroCardioGram (ECG) interpretation
ElectroCardioGram (ECG) interpretation (Normal / Abnormal - Abnormality description)
Measured: Day 0, Week 8, Week 26, Week 52
Medico-economic interest of RGn600 treatment with regards to healthcare consumption
Resource Utilization in Dementia (RUD) questionnaire filled in by the patient/caregiver.
Measured: Day 0, Week 26
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted3 Jul 2023
- Study start24 Jul 2023
- Primary completionJun 2027 (estimated)
- Study completionDec 2027 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Alzheimer DiseaseStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- An interventional, prospective, multicentric, randomized, comparative and double-blinded pivotal clinical investigation
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 108 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- REGEnLIFE SAS
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- RCTs, University Hospital, Toulouse
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Guillaume BLIVET, Study director, REGEnLIFE SASJacques TOUCHON, Study chair, Montpellier UniversityJulien DELRIEU, Principal investigator, Toulouse University Hospital Gerontopole
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05926011
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- LIGHT4LIFE
- Other IDs
- 2022-A02556-37
- Acronym
- LIGHT4LIFE
- Status last verified
- Aug 2026
- First submitted
- 6 Jun 2023
- Last updated
- 21 Aug 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 21 Aug 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Efficacy of RGn600 in Patients With Mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's Disease: a Pivotal, Sham-controlled, Randomized, Double-blind, Multicentric Investigation (LIGHT4LIFE)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05926011
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- LIGHT4LIFE / LIGHT4LIFE
- Conditions
- Alzheimer Disease
- Keywords
- Alzheimer, Neurostimulation, Optics and photonics, Photobiomodulation, Brain Diseases, Central Nervous System Diseases, Nervous System Diseases, Medical Device
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 108 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- REGEnLIFE SASIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- RCTs, University Hospital, Toulouse
- Study start
- 24 Jul 2023 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Jun 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Dec 2027 (estimated)
- First posted
- 3 Jul 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This is a controlled investigation, with randomization of the patients, which aims at demonstrating the efficacy of device RGn600 in treating patients with mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's disease (AD). RGn600 is a non-invasive medical device which is applied on the head (helmet) and on the abdomen (abdominal belt). It combines 2 technologies:
- PhotoBioModulation (PBM), which involves exposure to light from the red to near-infrared wavelengths using lasers and Light Emitting Diodes (LEDs)
- Static Magnetic Stimulation (SMS), which consists in the application of a static magnetic field.
Considering previous investigations, this innovative technology could reduce inflammation on the brain-gut axis, implicated in the development of Alzheimer's disease.
Detailed description
This multicentric investigation is planned to include 108 patients in France who will be followed up to 52 weeks.
Patients meeting all eligibility criteria will be randomized on a 1: 1 ratio into one of the two following treatment groups: active RGn600 device or sham device (inactivated RGn600). The site investigation teams and patients/caregivers will be blinded. The device will be applied to the patients during 26 weeks through 20-min onsite sessions following the below pattern:
- 5 treatment sessions per week from Week 1 (W1) to W8
- 3 treatment sessions per week from W9 to W16
- 2 treatment sessions per week from W17 to W26 Throughout the investigation, patients will be treated per randomization with the device initially allocated by the IWRS.
Follow-up will continue up to W52 ± 2 weeks
At inclusion visit, after verification of the eligibility criteria, data regarding patients will be collected: demographic data, date of AD diagnosis, comorbidities, concomitant medications, sociological data. A blood sample for APOE genotyping will be also performed.
Endpoints will be evaluated during 4 onsite visits at Day 0 (Inclusion, randomization to the active or sham group and first treatment session), W8 (last treatment session of), W26 (last treatment session of) and W52 ± 2 weeks. During these visits:
- Patient's cognition and autonomy will be assessed through neurological scales and/or neuropsychological tests
- Patient's quality of life and medico-economic interest of RGn600 treatment with regards to healthcare consumption will be assessed through questionnaires fulfilled by the patient himself/herself with the help of his/her caregiver
- The safety of RGn600 will be assessed : collection of all AEs and device deficiencies, blood samples for safety analysis, clinical exams
Within the context of this investigation, a biobank will be created based on blood, fecal and saliva samples of patients included by Toulouse University Hospital Gerontopole site:
- Blood samples will be collected for all patients included by this site (at D0, W26 and W52)
- Fecal samples will be collected for the first 30 consecutive patients included by this site (at D0, W26 and W52).
- Saliva samples will be collected for the patients included by this site after the substantial modification approval (at D0, W26 and W52).
The biobank will be located at the site. The objective of this biobank will be to perform subsequent analysis on blood samples of AD blood markers. Other analyses might be conducted on blood, fecal and saliva samples as well such as Inflammatory blood markers (iAGE), fecal microbiota and metabolome and salivary micro RiboNucleic Acid (microRNAs)
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- An interventional, prospective, multicentric, randomized, comparative and double-blinded pivotal clinical investigation
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Active RGn600 | Experimental | Device: RGn600RGn600 with a 10 Hz-pulsed wave mode light emission |
| Sham | Sham comparator | Device: RGn600 ShamInactivated RGn600 |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 55 to 85 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Male or female aged 55 to 85 years old (both included)
- Diagnosed with AD according to McKhann et al. international criteria dated 2011
- With mild-to-moderate AD, i.e., 10 ≤ MMSE score ≤ 26
- With blood analyses results (for: thyroid-stimulating hormone, vitamin B12, folate, complete blood count including platelets, electrolytes including calcium, creatinine, clearance, alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, bilirubin, coagulation, C-reactive protein) dated less than 1 year ago in line with AD diagnosis, as deemed by the investigator
- With brain Computed Tomography (CT) or/and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) scan dated less than 1 year ago in line with AD diagnosis, as deemed by the investigator
Key exclusion criteria (20 listed)
- Patient protected by a French legal measure ("sauvegarde de justice", "tutelle" or "curatelle")
- Patient deprived of liberty or hospitalized without consent
- Non-menopausal woman
- Patient taking a disease-modifying treatment such as the Leqembi® or any other disease-modifying treatment that may be authorized in France before the end of the study
- Patient living in a medical facility
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| RGn600RGn600 with a 10 Hz-pulsed wave mode light emission | Device | Active RGn600 |
| RGn600 ShamRGn600 inactivated | Device | Sham |
Primary outcome
Evolution of patient's cognition between Day 0 and Week 26 as measured with the AD Assessment Scale-cognitive subscale (ADAS-cog) score
Time frame: Day 0, Week 26
Absolute change (Week 26-Day 0) in ADAS-cog score
30 secondary outcomes
Evolution of patient's cognition from Day 0 to Week 8, from Day 0 to Week 52 and from Week 26 to Week 52 as measured with the AD Assessment Scale-cognitive subscale (ADAS-cog) score
Time frame: Day 0, Week 8, Week 26, Week 52
Evolution from Day 0 to Week 26 and from Day 0 to Week 52 of patient's cognitive functions
Time frame: Day 0, Week 26, Week 52
Evolution from Day 0 to Week 26 and from Day 0 to Week 52 of patient's cognitive functions
Time frame: Day 0, Week 26, Week 52
Evolution from Day 0 to Week 26 and from Day 0 to Week 52 of patient's cognitive functions
Time frame: Day 0, Week 26, Week 52
Evolution from Day 0 to Week 26 and from Day 0 to Week 52 of patient's cognitive functions
Time frame: Day 0, Week 26, Week 52
Evolution from Day 0 to Week 26 and from Day 0 to Week 52 of patient's cognitive functions
Time frame: Day 0, Week 26, Week 52
Evolution from Day 0 to Week 26 and from Day 0 to Week 52 of patient's cognitive functions
Time frame: Day 0, Week 26, Week 52
Evolution from Day 0 to Week 26 and from Day 0 to Week 52 of patient's cognitive functions
Time frame: Day 0, Week 26, Week 52
Evolution from Day 0 to Week 26 and from Day 0 to Week 52 of patient's autonomy
Time frame: Day 0, Week 26, Week 52
Evolution from Day 0 to Week 26 and from Day 0 to Week 52 of patient's Overall clinical response
Time frame: Day 0, Week 26, Week 52
Evolution from Day 0 to Week 26 and from Day 0 to Week 52 of patient's Quality of life
Time frame: Day 0, Week 26, Week 52
Incidence of Adverse Events (AEs)
Time frame: Throughout the investigation (from Day 0 to Week 52)
Incidence of RGn600's Adverse Device Effects (ADEs)
Time frame: Throughout the investigation (from Day 0 to Week 52)
Incidence of RGn600's Device Deficiencies (DDs)
Time frame: Throughout the investigation (from Day 0 to Week 52)
Evolution from Day 0 to Week 8, Day 0 to Week 26 and from Day 0 to Week 52 of level of safety blood markers
Time frame: Day 0, Week 8, Week 26, Week 52
Evolution from Day 0 to Week 8, Day 0 to Week 26 and from Day 0 to Week 52 of level of safety blood markers
Time frame: Day 0, Week 8, Week 26, Week 52
Evolution from Day 0 to Week 8, Day 0 to Week 26 and from Day 0 to Week 52 of level of safety blood markers
Time frame: Day 0, Week 8, Week 26, Week 52
Evolution from Day 0 to Week 8, Day 0 to Week 26 and from Day 0 to Week 52 of level of safety blood markers
Time frame: Day 0, Week 8, Week 26, Week 52
Evolution from Day 0 to Week 8, Day 0 to Week 26 and from Day 0 to Week 52 of level of safety blood markers
Time frame: Day 0, Week 8, Week 26, Week 52
Evolution from Day 0 to Week 8, Day 0 to Week 26 and from Day 0 to Week 52 of level of safety blood markers
Time frame: Day 0, Week 8, Week 26, Week 52
Evolution from Day 0 to Week 8, Day 0 to Week 26 and from Day 0 to Week 52 of level of safety blood markers
Time frame: Day 0, Week 8, Week 26, Week 52
Evolution from Day 0 to Week 8, Day 0 to Week 26 and from Day 0 to Week 52 of level of safety blood markers
Time frame: Day 0, Week 8, Week 26, Week 52
Evolution from Day 0 to Week 8, Day 0 to Week 26 and from Day 0 to Week 52 of level of safety blood markers
Time frame: Day 0, Week 8, Week 26, Week 52
Evolution from Day 0 to Week 8, Day 0 to Week 26 and from Day 0 to Week 52 of level of safety blood markers
Time frame: Day 0, Week 8, Week 26, Week 52
Evolution from Day 0 to Week 8, Day 0 to Week 26 and from Day 0 to Week 52 of Blood pressure
Time frame: Day 0, Week 8, Week 26, Week 52
Evolution from Day 0 to Week 8, Day 0 to Week 26 and from Day 0 to Week 52 of Weight
Time frame: Day 0, Week 8, Week 26, Week 52
Evolution from Day 0 to Week 8, Day 0 to Week 26 and from Day 0 to Week 52 of Heart rate
Time frame: Day 0, Week 8, Week 26, Week 52
Evolution from Day 0 to Week 8, Day 0 to Week 26 and from Day 0 to Week 52 of Temperature
Time frame: Day 0, Week 8, Week 26, Week 52
Evolution from Day 0 to Week 8, Day 0 to Week 26 and from Day 0 to Week 52 of ElectroCardioGram (ECG) interpretation
Time frame: Day 0, Week 8, Week 26, Week 52
Medico-economic interest of RGn600 treatment with regards to healthcare consumption
Time frame: Day 0, Week 26
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 21 Aug 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Alzheimer Disease
RecruitingPhase 2
Neuroplasticity Enhancement From Cognitive Training Reinforced by Psilocybin
Alzheimer's Disease
Not yet recruiting
Acupressure as Long-term Intervention to Slow the Progression of Early/Mild Alzheimer's Disease
Alzheimer's Disease
RecruitingObservational study
Effectiveness and Safety of Disease-Modifying Therapy for Alzheimer's Disease: A Multicenter Retrospective Study
Alzheimer's Disease (AD)
RecruitingPhase 3
A Phase 3 Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of KarXT + KarX-EC for the Treatment of Agitation Associated With Alzheimer's Disease (ADAGIO-1)
Alzheimer Disease
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study of Trontinemab in Cognitively Unimpaired Individuals at Risk for Progression to Symptomatic Alzheimer's Disease
Alzheimer's Disease
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Guillaume BLIVET study director
REGEnLIFE SAS
Jacques TOUCHON study chair
Montpellier University
Julien DELRIEU principal investigator
Toulouse University Hospital Gerontopole
7 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing RGn600 in people with Alzheimer Disease, run by REGEnLIFE SAS at 7 sites in France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 9 inclusion and 20 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Aug 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 7 sites in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Guillaume CHAMPLEBOUX (+33 649 813 454, gchampleboux@regenlife.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Evolution of patient's cognition between Day 0 and Week 26 as measured with the AD Assessment Scale-cognitive subscale (ADAS-cog) score (time frame: Day 0, Week 26). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Aug 2026.