AzTrials
AzTrials

GingivitisNOQMOQSNCT05813236

NOVOSYN® Quick Versus MONOSYN® Quick Suture Material in Resective Periodontal Surgery

A study testing Novosyn® in resective periodontal surgery and Monosyn® in resective periodontal surgery in people with Gingivitis and Gingival Diseases, run by Aesculap AG at 1 site in Spain.

Recruiting

Looking for participants now. Contact the study team or a site below to ask about taking part.

Sites and contacts
Official record

Search all trials

Trial summary

The aim of this study is to prove that Novosyn Quick and Monosyn Quick are equivalent in early wound healing in adult patients undergoing resective periodontal surgery. In order to show equivalence between Novosyn Quick and Monosyn Quick EHS, which is composed of 3 parameters: clinical signs of reepithelization… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
What is being tested?
Novosyn® in resective periodontal surgery and Monosyn® in resective periodontal surgery
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
84 participants
Where
1 siteSpain
Study dates
28 Jun 2023to Dec 2026
Phase
Interventional

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Adult patient undergoing resective periodontal surgery abd one of the incisions below has been performed:
  • Crestal incision
  • Vertical incision
  • Intrasulcular incision
  • Submarginal incision
  • Written informed consent regarding the data collection for the RCT

Who cannot join

  • Emergency surgery.
  • Pregnancy.
  • Breastfeeding
  • Patients taking medication that might affect wound healing.
  • Patients having a condition that might affect wound healing.
  • Patients with hypersensitivity or allergy to the suture material

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Jaume García López, Dr. contact

+3493586620 ext. 0

info@bbraun.com

Jose Manuel Molina, Dr. contact

info@bbraun.com

Spain1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Facultat d'Odontologia. Universitat Internacional de Catalunya

    Sant Cugat del Vallès, Catalonia, 08195

    Carolina Mor Reinoso, Dra.

    Carolina Mor Reinoso, Dra.

    Recruiting

Other trials in Spain

About this study

Official title: Randomized, Monocentric, Double Blinded, Prospective Study to Evaluate the Early Wound Healing After the Utilization of NOVOSYN® Quick Versus MONOSYN® Quick Suture Material in Resective Periodontal Surgery

The aim of this study is to prove that Novosyn Quick and Monosyn Quick are equivalent in early wound healing in adult patients undergoing resective periodontal surgery.

In order to show equivalence between Novosyn Quick and Monosyn Quick EHS, which is composed of 3 parameters: clinical signs of reepithelization, clinical signs of haemostasis and clinical signs of inflammation, will be calculated for each suture 10 ± 5 days postoperatively and cannot differ more than 2 points.

Furthermore, complications, the handling of the suture material, pain, satisfaction of the patient and bacterial contamination of the thread (optional) will also be assessed as secondary objectives.

Being tested
Novosyn® in resective periodontal surgery, Monosyn® in resective periodontal surgery
Keywords
Resective periodontal surgery
Medical subject headings
Gingivitis, Gingival Diseases, Periodontal Diseases

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Novosyn® in resective periodontal surgeryDevice

    The aim of resective procedures is the re-establishment of a healthy periodontium at a reduced level, accepting as irreversible the destruction that has already occurred. In essence, these procedures are all designed to achieve pocket elimination or reduction by the apical shift of the gingival margin.

  • Monosyn® in resective periodontal surgeryDevice

    The aim of resective procedures is the re-establishment of a healthy periodontium at a reduced level, accepting as irreversible the destruction that has already occurred. In essence, these procedures are all designed to achieve pocket elimination or reduction by the apical shift of the gingival margin.

Study groups in NCT05813236
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Novosyn®ExperimentalNovosyn® Quick is available in a range of gauge sizes and lengths, non-needled or attached to stainless steel needles of varying types and sizes: Novosyn® Quick sutures are available undyed in sizes USP 2 (5 metric) through USP 6-0 (0.7 metric).
Receives: Device: Novosyn® in resective periodontal surgery
Monosyn®Active comparatorMonosyn® Quick is a sterile, synthetic, absorbable, monofilament surgical suture material made from a triblock copolymer comprising glycolide (72 %), ε-caprolactone (14 %) and trimethylene carbonate (14 %), which is only available undyed.
Receives: Device: Monosyn® in resective periodontal surgery

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. early wound healing score (EHS)

    The primary end point in order to evaluate the primary objective of the study will be the determination of early wound healing score (EHS) in patients undergoing resective periodontal surgery. The EHS will be evaluated in 3 parameters: clinical signs of re-epithelization (CSR), clinical signs of haemostasis (CSH), and clinical signs of inflammation (CSI). Zero, 3 or 6 points have been used to evaluate the CSR, whereas 0, 1, or 2 points have been used for both CSH and CSI (Table 3). The summation of these 3 parameters generated the EHS. The EHS for ideal wound healing was 10 points, while the worst possible score was 0 points. An EHS of 0 points was assigned in the presence of suppuration, independently of the ratings for the 3 single parameters.

    Measured: 10 ± 5 days postoperatively

Secondary outcomes (12)
  1. Number of patients showing postoperative wound dehiscence

    Incidence of wound dehiscence after resective periodontal surgery. Dehiscence is the

    Measured: 10 ± 5 days postoperatively

  2. Number of patients showing postoperative Dentinal hypersensitivity

    Incidence of Dentinal hypersensitivity after resective periodontal surgery

    Measured: 10 ± 5 days postoperatively

  3. Number of patients showing postoperative Oral candidiasis

    Incidence of oral candidiasis after resective periodontal surgery

    Measured: 10 ± 5 days postoperatively

  4. Number of patients showing postoperative Angular cheilitis

    Incidence of Angular cheilitis after resective periodontal surgery

    Measured: 10 ± 5 days postoperatively

  5. Number of patients showing postoperative Swelling

    Incidence of Swelling after resective periodontal surgery

    Measured: 10 ± 5 days postoperatively

  6. Number of patients showing postoperative Bleeding

    Incidence of Bleeding after resective periodontal surgery

    Measured: 10 ± 5 days postoperatively

  7. Number of patients showing postoperative Infection

    Incidence of infection after resective periodontal surgery

    Measured: 10 ± 5 days postoperatively

  8. Number of Systemic complications

    The number of systemic complications is summarized, this includes fever, skin rash, neuropraxia, trismus, osteomyelitis, sinusitis and other complications.

    Measured: 10 ± 5 days postoperatively

  9. Pain assessment

    This parameter will be noted using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) which state "0" at one end representing "no pain" and "100" at the opposite end representing "maximal pain"

    Measured: 10 ± 5 days postoperatively

  10. Satisfaction of the patient

    This parameter will be noted using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) which state "0" at one end representing "not satisfied at all" and "100" at the opposite end representing "completely satisfied"

    Measured: 10 ± 5 days postoperatively

  11. Number of patients with Bacterial contamination of the thread (optional)

    Assessment of bacterial colonization on the thread of the suture will be evaluated by sending the swab of the suture to laboratory to be investigated and analysed. Polymerase Chain Reaktion Test (PCR) analysis is the test used for bacterial colonization. The micro-IDent® and micro-IDent® plus tests are able to identify 11 bacterial pathogens, including two complex pathogens.

    Measured: 10 ± 5 days postoperatively

  12. Assessment of the handling of the suture material

    Assessment of the suture material will be performed intra-operatively using a questionnaire including different dimensions (ease of passage through the tissue, first throw knot holding, knot security, knot tie down smoothness, surgical hand, memory effect and degree of fraying) with 5 point scale (excellent, very good, good, satisfied, poor) and the overall handling of the suture material.

    Measured: intraoperatively

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted14 Apr 2023
  2. Study start28 Jun 2023
  3. Primary completionOct 2026 (estimated)
  4. Study completionDec 2026 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Patients undergoing resective periodontal surgery will randomly (1:1) receive Novosyn Quick (control group) or Monosyn Quick (treatment group). Randomization will take place intraoperatively through dynamic allocation with minimisation algorithm to a suture group. Randomization will be stratified by study site.
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
84 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05813236
Sponsor's protocol ID
AAG-O-H-2109
Acronym
NOQMOQS
Status last verified
Aug 2026
First submitted
3 Apr 2023
Last updated
13 Aug 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in