Somatic Symptom DisorderNCT05795803
Effects of COVID-19 Forced Isolation Context on Adolescents With and Without Somatic Symptom Disorder
An observational study of Somatic Symptom Disorder, run by IRCCS Burlo Garofolo at 1 site in Italy.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether a forced isolation context (such provided by the ongoing Covid-19 pandemic restrictive measures) could reduce the burden of somatic symptoms among a group of patients with Somatic Symptom Disorder (SSD). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 12 to 17 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Somatic Symptom Disorder
- What is being tested?
- Forced isolation context
- How many people
- 115 participants
- Where
- 1 siteItaly
- Study dates
- 1 Apr 2020to 31 May 2020
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 12 to 17 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child
Study population: * SSD group: Adolescents who received a diagnosis of SSD at the Institute for maternal and child health "Burlo Garofolo" * Without SSD group: Adolescents who accessed the Emergency Department for traumatic injuries or the Pediatric Clinic/Day Hospital Service for oral immunotherapy because of food allergies.
Who may be able to join
- Adolescents aged between 12 and 17 years old who received a diagnosis of SSD within the last six months or before unless assessed and confirmed by a specialist within the last six months
- Adolescents without a diagnosis of SSD, who previously accessed the Institute for maternal and child health "Burlo Garofolo" Emergency Department for traumatic injuries or the Pediatric Clinic/Day Hospital Service for oral immunotherapy because of food allergies.
- Adolescents experiencing a quarantine period during the Covid19 pandemic.
Who cannot join
- Adolescents with cognitive impairment.
- Adolescents with chronic diseases.
- Adolescents with other neuropsychiatric disorders according to the fifth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorder (DSM V).
- For the group without SSD diagnosis, any access to Emergency Department for unexplained chronic pain or any history of other psychiatric comorbidities.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Italy1 site
Institute for Maternal and Child Health - IRCCS Burlo Garofolo-
Trieste, 34137
About this study
Official title: Effects of a Pandemic Forced Isolation Context on Adolescents With Somatic Symptom Disorder. A Panel Study
The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether a forced isolation context (such provided by the ongoing Covid-19 pandemic restrictive measures) could reduce the burden of somatic symptoms among a group of patients with Somatic Symptom Disorder (SSD). Secondary objective is to assess if a reduction in terms of depression tendency and anxiety occurs in this specific population and which are the effect of such a context among a group of adolescents without SSD. We want to compare these results with data obtained at the end of the pandemic.
Read the detailed description
This study aims to evaluate whether the forced isolation context provided by the ongoing Covid-19 pandemic is providing an advantage in terms of reduction of somatic symptoms burden among an Italian group of adolescents with SSD, assessed by the Patient Health Questionnaire (PhQ15) administered during and at the end of the pandemic.
Secondary objectives of the study are:
- To investigate the difference in anxiety and depression scores assessed by the Multidimensional Anxiety Scale for Children (MASC2) and Child Development Inventory (CDI-2) questionnaires among a group of SSD adolescents, during and after the pandemic isolation context.
- To investigate the difference in anxiety and depression scores assessed by the Multidimensional Anxiety Scale for Children (MASC2) and Child Development Inventory (CDI-2) questionnaires among a group of adolescents without SSD, during and after the pandemic isolation context.
- To compare the difference in anxiety and depression scores time modification between the two groups of adolescents.
- To explore through tailored questions which adolescents' coping strategies are during a pandemic isolation context among SSD patients and a group of controls without SSD.
- Conditions
- Somatic Symptom Disorder
- Being tested
- Forced isolation context
- Keywords
- SSD, adolescents, coping strategies, social media
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Forced isolation contextOther
Also called COVID-19 lockdown
Exposure to the forced isolation context provided by the ongoing Covid-19 pandemic restrictive measures
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| SSD group | Adolescents with SSD diagnosis made within previously six months or before unless assessed and confirmed by a specialist within the last six months Receives: Other: Forced isolation context | |
| Without SSD group | Control group: adolescents without diagnosis of SSD, matched with the SSD group by age and sex Receives: Other: Forced isolation context |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Difference in mean PhQ15 scale scores between T0 and T1 in the SSD adolescents group.
To SSD group, the Health Questionnaire Physical Symptoms (PhQ15) will be administrated to quantify the somatic symptom burden.
Measured: During the pandemic and within 6 months after the end
Secondary outcomes (7)
Difference in mean MASC2 scores between T0 and T1 in the SSD group.
SSD adolescents will receive the Multidimensional Anxiety Scale for Children (MASC 2), composed by 50 items, to quantify adolescents' anxiety.
Measured: During the pandemic and within 6 months after the end
Difference in mean CDI-2 short questionnaire scores between T0 and T1 in the SSD group.
SSD adolescents will receive the Children's Depression Inventory (CDI-2) self-report short questionnaire, composed by 12 items, to quantify adolescents' depression.
Measured: During the pandemic and within 6 months after the end
Difference in mean MASC2 scores between T0 and T1 in the adolescents group without SSD diagnosis.
Adolescents without SSD will receive the Multidimensional Anxiety Scale for Children (MASC 2), composed by 50 items, to quantify adolescents' anxiety
Measured: During the pandemic and within 6 months after the end
Difference in mean CDI-2 short questionnaires scores between T0 and T1 in the adolescents group without SSD diagnosis.
Adolescents without SSD will receive the Children's Depression Inventory (CDI-2) self-report short questionnaire, composed by 12 items, to quantify adolescents' depression
Measured: During the pandemic and within 6 months after the end
Comparison between the two groups of adolescents in the mean T1-T0 differences for MASC2 scores.
Differences in the Multidimensional Anxiety Scale for Children (MASC 2), composed by 50 items
Measured: During the pandemic and within 6 months after the end
Comparison between the two groups of adolescents in the mean T1-T0 differences for CDI-2 short questionnaires scores.
Differences in Children's Depression Inventory (CDI-2) self-report short questionnaire, composed by 12 items
Measured: During the pandemic and within 6 months after the end
Description of adolescents' coping strategies during a pandemic isolation context among SSD and non-SSD adolescent
A general anonymous semi-structured survey will be administered to both the groups in order to investigate their habits, social media and videogames pattern of usage, and other leisure pattern of frequency. This will provide us a description of adolescents' general coping strategies during quarantine period.
Measured: During the pandemic
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted3 Apr 2023
- Study start1 Apr 2020
- Primary completion31 May 2020
- Study completion31 May 2020
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Somatic Symptom DisorderStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Other
- Time perspective
- Cross-sectional
- Enrolment
- 115 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- IRCCS Burlo Garofolo
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Giuseppe Abbracciavento, MD, Study chair, Institute for maternal and child health Burlo GarofoloLaura De Nardi, MD, Principal investigator, Institute for maternal and child health Burlo GarofoloAndrea Trombetta, MD, Principal investigator, Institute for maternal and child health Burlo Garofolo
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05795803
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- RC 11/2020
- Status last verified
- Mar 2023
- First submitted
- 11 May 2020
- Last updated
- 3 Apr 2023
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 3 Apr 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Effects of a Pandemic Forced Isolation Context on Adolescents With Somatic Symptom Disorder. A Panel Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05795803
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- RC 11/2020
- Conditions
- Somatic Symptom Disorder
- Keywords
- SSD, adolescents, coping strategies, social media
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 115 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- IRCCS Burlo GarofoloUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Apr 2020 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 May 2020 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 May 2020 (actual)
- First posted
- 3 Apr 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether a forced isolation context (such provided by the ongoing Covid-19 pandemic restrictive measures) could reduce the burden of somatic symptoms among a group of patients with Somatic Symptom Disorder (SSD). Secondary objective is to assess if a reduction in terms of depression tendency and anxiety occurs in this specific population and which are the effect of such a context among a group of adolescents without SSD. We want to compare these results with data obtained at the end of the pandemic.
Detailed description
This study aims to evaluate whether the forced isolation context provided by the ongoing Covid-19 pandemic is providing an advantage in terms of reduction of somatic symptoms burden among an Italian group of adolescents with SSD, assessed by the Patient Health Questionnaire (PhQ15) administered during and at the end of the pandemic.
Secondary objectives of the study are:
- To investigate the difference in anxiety and depression scores assessed by the Multidimensional Anxiety Scale for Children (MASC2) and Child Development Inventory (CDI-2) questionnaires among a group of SSD adolescents, during and after the pandemic isolation context.
- To investigate the difference in anxiety and depression scores assessed by the Multidimensional Anxiety Scale for Children (MASC2) and Child Development Inventory (CDI-2) questionnaires among a group of adolescents without SSD, during and after the pandemic isolation context.
- To compare the difference in anxiety and depression scores time modification between the two groups of adolescents.
- To explore through tailored questions which adolescents' coping strategies are during a pandemic isolation context among SSD patients and a group of controls without SSD.
Study design
- Observational model
- Other
- Time perspective
- Cross-sectional
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| SSD group | – | Other: Forced isolation contextAdolescents with SSD diagnosis made within previously six months or before unless assessed and confirmed by a specialist within the last six months |
| Without SSD group | – | Other: Forced isolation contextControl group: adolescents without diagnosis of SSD, matched with the SSD group by age and sex |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 12 to 17 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child
- Study population
- * SSD group: Adolescents who received a diagnosis of SSD at the Institute for maternal and child health "Burlo Garofolo" * Without SSD group: Adolescents who accessed the Emergency Department for traumatic injuries or the Pediatric Clinic/Day Hospital Service for oral immunotherapy because of food allergies.
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Adolescents aged between 12 and 17 years old who received a diagnosis of SSD within the last six months or before unless assessed and confirmed by a specialist within the last six months
- Adolescents without a diagnosis of SSD, who previously accessed the Institute for maternal and child health "Burlo Garofolo" Emergency Department for traumatic injuries or the Pediatric Clinic/Day Hospital Service for oral immunotherapy because of food allergies.
- Adolescents experiencing a quarantine period during the Covid19 pandemic.
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Adolescents with cognitive impairment.
- Adolescents with chronic diseases.
- Adolescents with other neuropsychiatric disorders according to the fifth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorder (DSM V).
- For the group without SSD diagnosis, any access to Emergency Department for unexplained chronic pain or any history of other psychiatric comorbidities.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Forced isolation contextAlso: COVID-19 lockdownExposure to the forced isolation context provided by the ongoing Covid-19 pandemic restrictive measures | Other | SSD group, Without SSD group |
Primary outcome
Difference in mean PhQ15 scale scores between T0 and T1 in the SSD adolescents group.
Time frame: During the pandemic and within 6 months after the end
To SSD group, the Health Questionnaire Physical Symptoms (PhQ15) will be administrated to quantify the somatic symptom burden.
7 secondary outcomes
Difference in mean MASC2 scores between T0 and T1 in the SSD group.
Time frame: During the pandemic and within 6 months after the end
Difference in mean CDI-2 short questionnaire scores between T0 and T1 in the SSD group.
Time frame: During the pandemic and within 6 months after the end
Difference in mean MASC2 scores between T0 and T1 in the adolescents group without SSD diagnosis.
Time frame: During the pandemic and within 6 months after the end
Difference in mean CDI-2 short questionnaires scores between T0 and T1 in the adolescents group without SSD diagnosis.
Time frame: During the pandemic and within 6 months after the end
Comparison between the two groups of adolescents in the mean T1-T0 differences for MASC2 scores.
Time frame: During the pandemic and within 6 months after the end
Comparison between the two groups of adolescents in the mean T1-T0 differences for CDI-2 short questionnaires scores.
Time frame: During the pandemic and within 6 months after the end
Description of adolescents' coping strategies during a pandemic isolation context among SSD and non-SSD adolescent
Time frame: During the pandemic
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 3 Apr 2023.
Related trials for Somatic Symptom Disorder
RecruitingObservational study
Precision-Based Genomics in Prostate Cancer
Prostate Cancer
Active, not recruiting
Body-oriented Psychotherapy for Individuals With a History of Child Maltreatment and Trauma-related Symptoms
Safety, Psychological, Acceptability of Health Care
RecruitingPhase 2
A 52-Week Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Arumakimig (MAS825) in Participants With VEXAS Followed by Open-Label Extension (OLE) Period
VEXAS Syndrome
Recruiting
Stress Management and Meditative Movements for Asian Americans With Depression and Physical Symptoms
Depression / Major Depressive Disorder, Mental Health (Depression)
Recruiting
Ultra-brief Psychological Treatments for Emotional Symptoms and Disorders
Depression - Major Depressive Disorder, Generalized Anxiety Disorder
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Giuseppe Abbracciavento, MD study chair
Institute for maternal and child health Burlo Garofolo
Laura De Nardi, MD principal investigator
Institute for maternal and child health Burlo Garofolo
Andrea Trombetta, MD principal investigator
Institute for maternal and child health Burlo Garofolo
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Somatic Symptom Disorder, run by IRCCS Burlo Garofolo at 1 site in Italy.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 Apr 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Difference in mean PhQ15 scale scores between T0 and T1 in the SSD adolescents group. (time frame: During the pandemic and within 6 months after the end). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 Apr 2023.