AzTrials
AzTrials

StrokeNCT05747950

Different Treatment Methods Effect on Upper Extremity Spasticity and Decreased Functionality After Stroke

A study testing Vibration, Modified Constraint-İnduced Movement Therapy and Conventional Therapy in people with Stroke and Spasticity as Sequela of Stroke, run by Zuhal Şevval Gökdere at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The aim of our study is to objectively and clearly determine the differences between the Spasticity and Decreased Functionality in the Upper Extremity Flexor Group Muscles After Stroke, the Vibration, mBZHT and Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation Applications in terms of treatment process and effectiveness, and to… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 75 years
What is being tested?
Vibration, Modified Constraint-İnduced Movement Therapy and Conventional Therapy
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
45 participants
Where
1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
Study dates
10 Jan 2023to 25 Jun 2023
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 75 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Those who are diagnosed with stroke between the ages of 18-75 and can stand
  • No cognitive and communication problems
  • Persons weighing less than 150 kg
  • Patients who have had at least 10 days after Botox application

Who cannot join

  • Individuals who are not stable in terms of vital signs
  • Those who have any open wounds on their upper extremities
  • Those with spasticity and contracture that prevent sole contact
  • Pathological conditions affecting upper extremity sensation (after surgery after fracture etc.)
  • Those with a Mini Mental Test score below 24
  • Posterior circulation stroke (stroke type in which basilar artery and cerebellum are affected)
Show all 10Show fewer
  • Arterial blood circulation disorders
  • Lymphatic Edema
  • Those who have been diagnosed with Multiple Sclerosis, Parkinson's and other neurological diseases
  • People with vision and hearing problemsPatients who have been diagnosed with stroke for at least 8 weeks

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Turkey (Türkiye)1 site
  • Kırıkkale University Faculty of Health Sciences Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation

    Kirikkale, Merkez, 71000

Other trials in Turkey (Türkiye)

About this study

Official title: The Effect of Local Vibration, Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy (CIMT) and Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation Applied to the Upper Extremity Spasticity and Decreased Functionality After Stroke

The aim of our study is to objectively and clearly determine the differences between the Spasticity and Decreased Functionality in the Upper Extremity Flexor Group Muscles After Stroke, the Vibration, mBZHT and Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation Applications in terms of treatment process and effectiveness, and to increase the use of the hands and upper extremities in the daily life activities of the patient.

Read the detailed description

The World Health Organization has defined stroke as a clinical condition that occurs suddenly, with no apparent cause other than a vascular cause, leading to focal or global cerebral dysfunction, lasting 24 hours or longer, or resulting in death. Stroke ranks third among the causes of death and first in terms of disability. Spasticity, a velocity-dependent increase in muscle tone as a part of upper motor neuron syndrome, is seen in a wide variety of neurological diseases, including stroke, and may occur in the first week after stroke.Rehabilitation aims to inhibit spasticity, improve motor functions, gain independence in activities of daily living, and improve health-related quality of life in stroke patients.This is an observational study within a study.This study was carried out in Kırıkkale University Faculty of Medicine, Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Hospital and Tokat State Hospital Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Unit 45 volunteers who were diagnosed with stroke, aged 18-75 years, who met the inclusion criteria of the study planned for the individual.In the study, patients were divided into 3 groups according to different treatment methods the effects of Local Vibration and m(CIMT) applied to upper extremity flexor muscle groups on spasticity and upper extremity functionality will be examined in addition to the conventional rehabilitation program in stroke individuals. A program that includes joint range of motion exercises, strengthening exercises, mobility and transfer activities and various activities to increase participation in daily life activities will be applied routinely for 3 sessions 45 minutes a week for 8 weeks in the first group of patients in the training group.In addition, in addition to conventional physiotherapy, patients in the 1st group immediately after the sessions. Upper extremity flexor on the hemiplegic side in supine position, 3 sessions per week with a CE certified vibration device with a frequency of 50-110 Hz and an amplitude of 1-4 mm.Vibration will be done for 15 minutes each.From the patients in the second group, for 8 weeks, 3 days a week, 60 minutes joint range of motion exercises as routine conventional treatment in sessions,strengthening exercises, mobility and transfer activities, and activities of daily living.In order to increase participation, a program including various activities will be implemented. Moreover after the sessions, patients can use their intact extremities with shoulder stabilization orthosis at home restraint, grasping on the hemiplegic side, using spoons and forks, combing hair daily life activities, 8 weeks, 3 days a week, and approximately 3 hours Modified Restrictor Forced Movement Therapy m(CIMT) will be applied.In the third group, the last group in the third group, for 8 weeks, 3 days a week, 60 minutes joint range of motion exercises as routine conventional treatment only in sessions, strengthening exercises, mobility and transfer activities, and activities of daily living. In order to increase participation, a program including various activities will be implemented.

First of all, all individuals; Demographic characteristics such as age, gender, height, weight, case report form will be questioned. Upper extremity of all subjects before and 8 weeks after treatment.

Spasticity (tonus, elasticity, stiffness) in flexor group muscles Modified Ashworth and It will be measured with modified Tardieu Scales. Manual dexterity, speed and coordination of upper extremity activities were determined by Fugl-Meyer Upper Limb Evaluation Scale, 9-Hole Peg Test, Box and Block Test [BBT]) and Upper Extremity Motor Activity Diary-28; The quality of life of individuals with stroke, with the Stroke-Specific Quality of Life Scale; Cognitive states of stroke individuals will be evaluated with the Mini Mental Test.

Being tested
Vibration, Modified Constraint-İnduced Movement Therapy, Conventional Therapy
Medical subject headings
Stroke, Mobility Limitation

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • VibrationOther

    Vibration is used as an alternative to physical exercise in various areas to increase muscle performance and flexibility, improve balance and proprioception, reduce spasticity and increase bone density.

  • Modified Constraint-İnduced Movement TherapyOther

    Compulsory use therapy is a form of treatment in which the movements of the healthy side are prevented and the use of the weak side is encouraged in the stroke patient.

  • Conventional TherapyOther

    Conventional exercises

Study groups in NCT05747950
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Vibration groupOtherVibration is defined as "a mechanical stimulus characterized by oscillating movements". has been defined.The first method is a hand held as a local vibration application that can be applied directly to the widest part of the muscle with the object.is named. The second method, called whole body vibration, is a vibration source applied on the platform. Participants immediately after the sessions in addition to conventional physiotherapy. Upper extremity flexor on the hemiplegic side in supine position, 8 weeks, 3 sessions per week with a CE certified vibration device with a frequency of 50-110 Hz and an amplitude of 1-4 mm. Local vibration will be applied for 15 minutes each.
Receives: Other: Vibration
Modified Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy groupOtherModified Constraint-İnduced Movement Therapy is a rehabilitation technique that promotes 'repetitive' use of the affected upper extremity in people with upper extremity neurological motor deficits. Constraint-İnduced Movement Therapy upper extremity after stroke it is a rehabilitation approach used to increase functional use. post stroke Approximately 20-25% of surviving patients can meet the motor criteria of mCIMT. Participants In addition to conventional treatment, they can use their intact extremities at home with a shoulder stabilization orthosis.Restraint, grasping on the hemiplegic side, using spoons and forks, combing hair daily life activities, 8 weeks, 3 days a week, and approximately 3 hours Modified Constraint-İnduced Movement Therapy m(CIMT) will be applied.
Receives: Other: Modified Constraint-İnduced Movement Therapy
Control groupOtherControl group in the training group, will be given a program that includes joint range of motion exercises, strengthening exercises, mobility and transfer activities, and various activities in order to increase participation in daily life activities as a routine conventional treatment in 60-minute sessions, 3 days a week, for 8 weeks.
Receives: Other: Conventional Therapy

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS)

    It is the most widely used clinical scale to evaluate spasticity. Despite its widespread clinical use, the reliability of the scale is questioned in some studies. Recent publications indicate that more studies are needed on the reliability of the scale.

    Measured: Change in Upper Extremity Spasticity at 8 Weeks,Two measurements before and after treatment, 1 minute

  2. Modified Tardieu Scale (MTS)

    Like the MAS, the Modified Tardieu Scale (MTS) is another clinical scale used to assess spasticity. Although it is not as widely used as MAS, it is recommended as a more effective method in the evaluation of spasticity because it measures resistance to passive movement at two different rates. While performing MTS, the extremities are moved passively with V1, V2 and V3 velocities. V1 speed; as slow as possible (slower than the gravity fall velocity of the limb segment), V2 velocity is defined as the extremity fall velocity, and V3 velocity is defined as as fast as possible (faster than the normal gravity fall velocity of the limb). In MTS, V1 velocity can be used to measure passive range of motion, and V2 or V3 velocities can be used to measure spasticity.

    Measured: Change in Upper Extremity Spasticity at 8 Weeks,Two measurements before and after treatment, 1 minute

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. Fugl-Meyer Upper Extremity Rating Scale

    It is a performance-based scale specific to hemiplegia, and each parameter is scored as 0: unsuccessful, 1: partially successful, 2: completely successful performance. Reflex activity, voluntary movements with dynamic flexor and/or extensor synergies, voluntary movements with the use of dynamic flexor and extensor synergies, voluntary movements without or little dependence on synergies, and normal reflex activity parameters are evaluated. When evaluating the wrist, three different functions of the wrist muscles are evaluated in the shoulder, elbow and forearm. In the hemiplegia hand evaluation, 7 movements (flexion, extension and five grip functions) are evaluated. In the evaluation of coordination / speed, finger-nose test is performed for the upper extremity. During this test, tremor, dysmetria, and speed of movement are evaluated. The maximum motor performance score for the upper extremity is 66 points.

    Measured: Change in Upper Extremity Functionality at 8 Weeks,Two measurements before and after treatment, 5 minutes

  2. Nine Hole Peg Test

    It is a simple, fast, manual skill test with proven validity and reliability. It is particularly sensitive to changes in upper extremity performance. The test material consists of nine small sticks made in standard sizes and a nine-hole board on which to place them. NHPT is applied with the patient in a sitting position. The patient is asked to line up the nine sticks in the box on the table as quickly as possible into the holes of the other box and, after finishing, remove them immediately. The test is started with the dominant hand, the time is measured with a stopwatch, and it is started when the hand touches the bars and ends when the last stick is placed in the box.

    Measured: Change in Upper Extremity Functionality at 8 Weeks,Two measurements before and after treatment, 4 minutes

  3. Stroke-Specific Quality of Life Scale

    In 1999, Williams et al. Developed by The original scale, consisting of 49 items in total, consists of 12 domains evaluating mobility, energy, upper extremity function, self-care, occupation/productivity, temperament, social role, family role, vision, language, thinking, and personality traits.

    Measured: Change in Upper Extremity Functionality at 8 Weeks,Two measurements before and after treatment, 5 minutes

  4. Box and Block Test (BBT)

    The Box-Block Test was developed to assess rough manual dexterity and is a very simple, practical and quick test to use. A box and small wooden blocks are used for the test, which is divided into two equal areas right in the middle. Small wooden blocks are all placed on one side of the box. For the test, the patient is told to throw the wooden blocks in one section into the other section as quickly as possible and 60 seconds are given. The test is applied to both the dominant and non-dominant hand and the number of wooden blocks thrown to the opposite side gives the total score. The test is particularly suitable for patients with limited grip and dexterity.

    Measured: Change in Upper Extremity Functionality at 8 Weeks,Two measurements before and after treatment, 1 minute

  5. Upper Extremity Motor Activity Diary-28

    This scale, which aims to evaluate the function of the hemiparetic upper extremity, was developed by Uswatte et al. in 2006. 30 upper extremity functions are evaluated and scored with 2 different scales as "use level" and "use quality". The score for each scale is calculated by summing the scores and dividing by the number of marked items.

    Measured: Change in Upper Extremity Functionality at 8 Weeks,Two measurements before and after treatment, 5 minutes

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted28 Feb 2023
  2. Study start10 Jan 2023
  3. Primary completion25 Jun 2023
  4. Study completion25 Jun 2023

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
In the study, 45 individuals between the ages of 18-75 who were diagnosed with stroke and met the inclusion criteria will be recruited. Individuals will be divided into 3 groups according to different treatment methods.
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator
Enrolment
45 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05747950
Sponsor's protocol ID
2022.12.08
Status last verified
Oct 2023
First submitted
8 Jan 2023
Last updated
18 Oct 2023
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: Working Protocol with Other Researchers, Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP),Informed Consent Form (ICF),Clinical Trial Report (CSR) and Analytical Code will be shared.

Publications

  • Nasb M, Li Z, S A Youssef A, Dayoub L, Chen H. Comparison of the effects of modified constraint-induced movement therapy and intensive conventional therapy with a botulinum-a toxin injection on upper limb motor function recovery in patients with stroke. Libyan J Med. 2019 Dec;14(1):1609304. doi: 10.1080/19932820.2019.1609304.

    PubMed 31032717
  • Caliandro P, Celletti C, Padua L, Minciotti I, Russo G, Granata G, La Torre G, Granieri E, Camerota F. Focal muscle vibration in the treatment of upper limb spasticity: a pilot randomized controlled trial in patients with chronic stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012 Sep;93(9):1656-61. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2012.04.002. Epub 2012 Apr 13.

    PubMed 22507444
  • Hsieh HC, Liao RD, Yang TH, Leong CP, Tso HH, Wu JY, Huang YC. The clinical effect of Kinesio taping and modified constraint-induced movement therapy on upper extremity function and spasticity in patients with stroke: a randomized controlled pilot study. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2021 Aug;57(4):511-519. doi: 10.23736/S1973-9087.21.06542-4. Epub 2021 Jan 15.

    PubMed 33448755

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Vibration, Modified Constraint-İnduced Movement Therapy and Conventional Therapy in people with Stroke and Spasticity as Sequela of Stroke, run by Zuhal Şevval Gökdere at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Oct 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) (time frame: Change in Upper Extremity Spasticity at 8 Weeks,Two measurements before and after treatment, 1 minute). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05747950, which also lists 3 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Oct 2023; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 26 Oct 2026.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in