Skin CancerPhase 1NCT05736224
Assessing a Natural Product Plus Bioadhesive Nanoparticle (BNP) Sunscreen
A Phase 1 study testing Sunscreen and UV Light in people with Skin Cancer, run by Yale University at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the effects of a novel sunscreen formulation by assessing the extent of ultraviolet radiation (UVR)-induced direct and indirect cellular and DNA damage to human skin, in the presence vs absence of the sunscreen, in a population of healthy adults with fair skin… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Skin Cancer
- What is being tested?
- Sunscreen and UV Light
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 30 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 15 May 2023to 1 Sep 2023
- Phase
- Phase 1
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Provision of signed and dated informed consent form
- Stated willingness to comply with all study procedures and availability for the duration of the study
- Women of child-bearing potential must have negative urine pregnancy test
- In good general health as evidenced by medical history
- Fair skinned with Fitzpatrick Scale skin types I, II or III using the following Skin Type and Sunburn and Tanning History (based on the first 30-45 minutes of sun exposure after a winter season of no sun exposure):
- I always burns easily; never tans (sensitive)
- II always burns easily; tans minimally (sensitive)
- III burns moderately; tans gradually (light brown) (normal)
Who cannot join
- Individuals with active or a history of dermatological disorders-psoriasis, rosacea, eczema, vitiligo, lupus, dermatomyositis, etc
- Individuals known to be subject to any abnormal responses to sunlight, such as phototoxic or photoallergic response.
- Current use of medication (topical or systemic) that is known to produce abnormal sunlight responses.
- History of skin cancer (such as basal cell carcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, melanoma)
- Family history of melanoma
- Presence of sunburn, suntan, scars, active dermal lesions or uneven skin tone on the test site.
Show all 12Show fewer
- Skin type falling under the Fitzpatrick Scale skin types IV, V or VI using the following Skin Type and Sunburn and Tanning History (based on the first 30-45 minutes of sun exposure after a winter season of no sun exposure):
- IV Burns minimally; always tans well (moderate brown) (normal)
- V Rarely burns; tans profusely (dark brown) (insensitive)
- Use of sunscreen within the last week on the test site area (such that UV filter penetration may confound results)
- Febrile illness within 48 hours.
- Women with a positive urine pregnancy test
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Yale School of Medicine
New Haven, Connecticut, 06511
About this study
The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the effects of a novel sunscreen formulation by assessing the extent of ultraviolet radiation (UVR)-induced direct and indirect cellular and DNA damage to human skin, in the presence vs absence of the sunscreen, in a population of healthy adults with fair skin (Fitzpatrick Scale type I, II or III).
Read the detailed description
Skin cancer is the most commonly diagnosed malignancy in the USA and ultraviolet radiation (UVR) exposure is the major environmental risk factor for skin cancer development. Currently available sunscreens utilize UVR filters that, while absorbing UVR energy, have been shown to induce ROS, resulting in oxidative DNA damage after UVR exposure. Organic sunscreen actives have also been shown to penetrate into the skin, raising direct toxicity, as well as irritant and photoallergic concerns. Further systemic absorption may result in additional health risks such as endocrine disruption. Novel sunscreens that more safely prevent both direct and indirect DNA damage are needed.
The study team have produced a bioadhesive nanoparticle (BNP) sunscreen designed to keep organic UVR filters from penetrating into the skin and have incorporated non-toxic natural products into this sunscreen to further safely boost UVR absorbing capacity and reduce oxidative, indirect DNA damage. This study will test the capacity of this sunscreen to prevent direct and indirect cellular and DNA damage in human skin exposed to UVR.
- Conditions
- Skin Cancer
- Being tested
- Sunscreen, UV Light
- Medical subject headings
- Skin Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
SunscreenDrug
The sunscreen contains bioadhesive nanoparticles (BNP) encapsulating avobenzone and octocrylene plus the non-toxic natural products diosmin, ferulic acid, cytisine and trans-resveratrol.
UV LightOther
UV light to the correct sites, and the Multiport 610 solar simulator used to deliver 1 MED UVR to the appropriate subsites.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Sunscreen | Experimental | Portion of skin covered by sunscreen. There are 3 different formulations of sunscreen (Formulation 1, Formulation 2, Formulation 3) Receives: Drug: Sunscreen; Other: UV Light |
| No treatment control | Other | Portion of skin not covered by sunscreen. Receives: Other: UV Light |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
DNA Damage Level by Cyclobutane Pyrimidine Dimer (CPD) Measurement
Ultraviolet radiation (UVR) exposure are indicative of direct DNA damage. DNA will be prepared and assayed by ELISA for quantification of CPDs. CPDs measured in samples obtained immediately after UVR exposure are indicative of direct DNA damage. DNA from skin biopsies was used to quantify the level of DNA damage, represented by CPD levels detected by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)
Measured: 5 minutes after UVR exposure
DNA Damage Level by Cyclobutane Pyrimidine Dimer (CPD) Measurement
Ultraviolet radiation (UVR) exposure are indicative of direct DNA damage. DNA will be prepared and assayed by ELISA for quantification of CPDs. CPDs measured in samples obtained immediately after UVR exposure are indicative of direct DNA damage. DNA from skin biopsies was used to quantify the level of DNA damage, represented by CPD levels detected by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)
Measured: 4 hours after UVR exposure
Detectable DNA Strand Breaks
Formalin fixed paraffin embedded skin stained with anti-gH2AX to identify keratinocytes with DNA strand breaks. Indirect, oxidative DNA damage may result in DNA strand breaks that can be visualized by microscopic analysis after staining for gH2AX, which builds up within cells with DNA strand break.
Measured: 5 minutes after UVR exposure
Number of DNA Strand Breaks
Formalin fixed paraffin embedded skin stained with anti-gH2AX to identify keratinocytes with DNA strand breaks. Indirect, oxidative DNA damage may result in DNA strand breaks that can be visualized by microscopic analysis after staining for gH2AX, which builds up within cells with DNA strand break.
Measured: 4 hours after UVR exposure
Cellular Damage
Formalin fixed paraffin embedded skin stained with anti-3-nitrotyrosine to identify cellular damage. ROS and high energy triplet state species can result in nitration of tyrosine residues of cellular proteins. This type of damage can be visualized by microscopic visualization of 3-nitrotyrosine.
Measured: 5 minutes after UVR exposure
Cellular Damage
Formalin fixed paraffin embedded skin stained with anti-3-nitrotyrosine to identify cellular damage. ROS and high energy triplet state species can result in nitration of tyrosine residues of cellular proteins. This type of damage can be visualized by microscopic visualization of 3-nitrotyrosine.
Measured: 4 hours after UVR exposure
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted21 Feb 2023
- Study start15 May 2023
- Primary completion1 Sep 2023
- Study completion1 Sep 2023
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Skin CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Yale UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 1
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Within subject design where participant serves as own control.
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 30 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Yale University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Cancer Institute (NCI)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Michael Girardi, MD, FAAD, Principal investigator, Evans Professor of Dermatology; Director, Residency Program, Dermatology
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05736224
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2000033876
- Other IDs
- 2P50CA121974-11A1
- Status last verified
- Nov 2024
- First submitted
- 9 Feb 2023
- Last updated
- 27 Nov 2024
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: Individual participant data that underlie the results published from this study, after deidentification (text, tables, figures, and appendices), will be made available to researchers who provide a methodologically sound proposal. Proposals should be directed to michael.girardi@yale.edu.
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 27 Nov 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Assessing a Natural Product Plus Bioadhesive Nanoparticle (BNP) Sunscreen
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05736224
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 2000033876
- Conditions
- Skin Cancer
- Phase
- Phase 1
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 30 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Yale UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Cancer Institute (NCI)
- Study start
- 15 May 2023 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Sep 2023 (actual)
- Study completion
- 1 Sep 2023 (actual)
- First posted
- 21 Feb 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 27 Nov 2024
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the effects of a novel sunscreen formulation by assessing the extent of ultraviolet radiation (UVR)-induced direct and indirect cellular and DNA damage to human skin, in the presence vs absence of the sunscreen, in a population of healthy adults with fair skin (Fitzpatrick Scale type I, II or III).
Detailed description
Skin cancer is the most commonly diagnosed malignancy in the USA and ultraviolet radiation (UVR) exposure is the major environmental risk factor for skin cancer development. Currently available sunscreens utilize UVR filters that, while absorbing UVR energy, have been shown to induce ROS, resulting in oxidative DNA damage after UVR exposure. Organic sunscreen actives have also been shown to penetrate into the skin, raising direct toxicity, as well as irritant and photoallergic concerns. Further systemic absorption may result in additional health risks such as endocrine disruption. Novel sunscreens that more safely prevent both direct and indirect DNA damage are needed.
The study team have produced a bioadhesive nanoparticle (BNP) sunscreen designed to keep organic UVR filters from penetrating into the skin and have incorporated non-toxic natural products into this sunscreen to further safely boost UVR absorbing capacity and reduce oxidative, indirect DNA damage. This study will test the capacity of this sunscreen to prevent direct and indirect cellular and DNA damage in human skin exposed to UVR.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Within subject design where participant serves as own control.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Sunscreen | Experimental | Drug: Sunscreen, Other: UV LightPortion of skin covered by sunscreen. There are 3 different formulations of sunscreen (Formulation 1, Formulation 2, Formulation 3) |
| No treatment control | Other | Other: UV LightPortion of skin not covered by sunscreen. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Provision of signed and dated informed consent form
- Stated willingness to comply with all study procedures and availability for the duration of the study
- Women of child-bearing potential must have negative urine pregnancy test
- In good general health as evidenced by medical history
- Fair skinned with Fitzpatrick Scale skin types I, II or III using the following Skin Type and Sunburn and Tanning History (based on the first 30-45 minutes of sun exposure after a winter season of no sun exposure):
Key exclusion criteria (12 listed)
- Individuals with active or a history of dermatological disorders-psoriasis, rosacea, eczema, vitiligo, lupus, dermatomyositis, etc
- Individuals known to be subject to any abnormal responses to sunlight, such as phototoxic or photoallergic response.
- Current use of medication (topical or systemic) that is known to produce abnormal sunlight responses.
- History of skin cancer (such as basal cell carcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, melanoma)
- Family history of melanoma
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| SunscreenThe sunscreen contains bioadhesive nanoparticles (BNP) encapsulating avobenzone and octocrylene plus the non-toxic natural products diosmin, ferulic acid, cytisine and trans-resveratrol. | Drug | Sunscreen |
| UV LightUV light to the correct sites, and the Multiport 610 solar simulator used to deliver 1 MED UVR to the appropriate subsites. | Other | No treatment control, Sunscreen |
Primary outcome
DNA Damage Level by Cyclobutane Pyrimidine Dimer (CPD) Measurement
Time frame: 5 minutes after UVR exposure
Ultraviolet radiation (UVR) exposure are indicative of direct DNA damage. DNA will be prepared and assayed by ELISA for quantification of CPDs. CPDs measured in samples obtained immediately after UVR exposure are indicative of direct DNA damage. DNA from skin biopsies was used to quantify the level of DNA damage, represented by CPD levels detected by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)
DNA Damage Level by Cyclobutane Pyrimidine Dimer (CPD) Measurement
Time frame: 4 hours after UVR exposure
Ultraviolet radiation (UVR) exposure are indicative of direct DNA damage. DNA will be prepared and assayed by ELISA for quantification of CPDs. CPDs measured in samples obtained immediately after UVR exposure are indicative of direct DNA damage. DNA from skin biopsies was used to quantify the level of DNA damage, represented by CPD levels detected by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)
Detectable DNA Strand Breaks
Time frame: 5 minutes after UVR exposure
Formalin fixed paraffin embedded skin stained with anti-gH2AX to identify keratinocytes with DNA strand breaks. Indirect, oxidative DNA damage may result in DNA strand breaks that can be visualized by microscopic analysis after staining for gH2AX, which builds up within cells with DNA strand break.
Number of DNA Strand Breaks
Time frame: 4 hours after UVR exposure
Formalin fixed paraffin embedded skin stained with anti-gH2AX to identify keratinocytes with DNA strand breaks. Indirect, oxidative DNA damage may result in DNA strand breaks that can be visualized by microscopic analysis after staining for gH2AX, which builds up within cells with DNA strand break.
Cellular Damage
Time frame: 5 minutes after UVR exposure
Formalin fixed paraffin embedded skin stained with anti-3-nitrotyrosine to identify cellular damage. ROS and high energy triplet state species can result in nitration of tyrosine residues of cellular proteins. This type of damage can be visualized by microscopic visualization of 3-nitrotyrosine.
Cellular Damage
Time frame: 4 hours after UVR exposure
Formalin fixed paraffin embedded skin stained with anti-3-nitrotyrosine to identify cellular damage. ROS and high energy triplet state species can result in nitration of tyrosine residues of cellular proteins. This type of damage can be visualized by microscopic visualization of 3-nitrotyrosine.
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 27 Nov 2024.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. Individual participant data that underlie the results published from this study, after deidentification (text, tables, figures, and appendices), will be made available to researchers who provide a methodologically sound proposal. Proposals should be directed to michael.girardi@yale.edu.
Related trials for Skin Cancer
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Study of INBRX-106 and INBRX-106 in Combination With Pembrolizumab (Keytruda®) in Subjects With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors (Hexavalent OX40 Agonist)
Solid Tumor, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
RecruitingPhase 1
IL-17 Blockade to Decrease irAEs (REPLAY)
Metastatic Melanoma
Active, not recruiting
Streamlined Geriatric and Oncological Evaluation Based On IC Technology
Breast Cancer, Comorbidities and Coexisting Conditions
RecruitingPhase 2
Gene Signatures to Guide HR+MBC Therapy in a Diverse Cohort
Invasive Mammary Carcinoma, Metastatic Breast Cancer
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study of Camrelizumab Plus Chemotherapy in Combination With or Without Famitinib as Neoadjuvant Therapy in Participants With Triple Negative Breast Cancer (BCTOP-T-N01)
TNBC - Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Michael Girardi, MD, FAAD principal investigator
Evans Professor of Dermatology; Director, Residency Program, Dermatology
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 1 study testing Sunscreen and UV Light in people with Skin Cancer, run by Yale University at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 12 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Nov 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 1 studies test a treatment in a small group of people for the first time or in a new way, mainly to check safety and find the right dose.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 27 Nov 2024). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
DNA Damage Level by Cyclobutane Pyrimidine Dimer (CPD) Measurement (time frame: 5 minutes after UVR exposure). The study lists 6 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Nov 2024.