Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2GO_EASYNCT05694351
Family-based Prevention of Diabetes Through Eating Habits and Physical Activity
A study testing Healthy meals and physical activity in families with type 2 diabetes in people with Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 and Family Health, run by Slagelse Hospital at 1 site in Denmark.
Trial summary
Introduction: Type 2 diabetes represents a growing health risk for the society. An easy-access and low-cost intervention for the whole family will be developed to help families with (at risk of) type 2 diabetes maintain diabetes-frendly everyday life. The intervention will be tested for feasibility. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 5 to 99 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Family Health, Health Behavior
- What is being tested?
- Healthy meals and physical activity in families with type 2 diabetes
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 18 participants
- Where
- 1 siteDenmark
- Study dates
- 15 Jan 2024to 31 Dec 2024
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 5 to 99 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Parents (aged 18 or older) with (or at risk of) type 2 diabetes living in the same household with 5-17 years old children
- At least one family member not meeting the current physical activity recommendations.
Who cannot join
- Pregnancy or postpartum period (6 months after birth)
- Current critical illness, e.g. cancer
- Participating in other type 2 diabetes treatment programs
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: GO EASY: Eating Habits and Physical Activity in Synergy for Diabetes Prevention in Families
Introduction: Type 2 diabetes represents a growing health risk for the society. An easy-access and low-cost intervention for the whole family will be developed to help families with (at risk of) type 2 diabetes maintain diabetes-frendly everyday life. The intervention will be tested for feasibility.
Methods: Following the framework for developing and conduct of complex interventions, the intervention will be developed on the basis of current evidence on family-based diabetes treatment and opinions of families with type 2 diabetes. The feasibility test will have embedded mixed methods one-group study design.
Read more
Participants: Families will answer a brief screening questionnaire. Families (n=25) that consist of at least one adult with (in risk of) type 2 diabetes living in the same household with at least one 5-18 yeard old child, and at least one family member living sedentary lifestyle, will participate.
Intervention: The 3-months long hybrid telehealth/face-to-face intervention with weekly 1-hour contacts with health professionals will deliver diabetes education and tailored support to implement more physical activity and healthy meals in the family everyday life. A 3-months long supervised maintenance phase with monthly professional contacts will be included.
Outcomes: Feasibility evaluation will be conducted using quantitative (quantifiable) and qualitative research methods. The feasibility data will be the primary outcomes of the study, collected and evaluated using the predefined research progression criteria applied the green-amber-red method. Sociodemography and secondary outcomes, such as physical activity, dieting habits, daily occupations, occupational balance, health and quality of life will be assessed at baseline and 3 and 6-months follow-ups. The quantitative results will be comprehended through qualitative data from participant interviews which will nuance the feasibility evaluation.
Analysis: Relevant statistical methods and qualitative analysis method will be applied.
Expected results: The intervention will help families achieve sustainable lifestyle changes, e.g., diabetes stabilized blood glucose in adults with type 2 diabetes, increased physical activity time and improved dieting habits, for better family health and well-being.
Ethics and dissemination: The trial does not have any obvious health risks for the participants. All the results - significant, non-significant and/ or inconclusive - will be reported.
Read the detailed description
Note: T2D means type 2 diabetes
Design
The GO EASY intervention is an easy-access and low-cost intervention promoting physical activity and healthier meals in families with (at risk of) T2D. The intervention will be developed and tested for feasibility, following the recommendations on developing and conducting complex interventions from the Medical Research Council (MRC) framework.
Feasibility evaluation of the intervention will be conducted using quantitative (quantifiable) and qualitative research methods. The quantitative results will be comprehended through qualitative data which will help a nuanced in-depth evaluation of feasibility from participant and clinical perspectives.
For the quantitative (quantifiable) data collection on feasibility, predefined research progression criteria will be determined, and the green-amber-red method will be applied. The green-amber-red method with the categories GREEN (Proceed with the RCT/ implementation), AMBER (Proceed, but changes to the protocol need to be discussed and solved) and RED (Do not proceed unless the problem can be solved) will help evaluate the readiness of the intervention to be tested for effectiveness in an RCT. Parameters relevant to T2D research, i.e., dieting habits, routines, and physical activity, will be monitored and assessed before and after the intervention. Several families will participate in objective physical activity assessments using technological devices (activity trackers).
Min. 10 - max. 20 qualitative family interviews will study the mechanisms of what is at stake during changing health behavior within participating families. Families who earned the experiences with the activity tracker technology will be invited to share their experiences in a separate qualitative interview-based study in a walk-and-talk format to explore the acceptability and usability of the devices.
Data privacy and ethical concerns
The project follows the principles of The World Medical Association (WMA) described in the WMA Declaration of Helsinki. The ethical approval of the project is sought at The Regional Committee on Health Research Ethics in Region Zealand (Denmark). The Data Protection Agency in Region Zealand (reg.) and the Research \& Innovation Organization (RIO) at the University of Southern Denmark (SDU) are sought for approval of the project. The use of activity trackers (Garmin) has been approved by the IT-Concern in Region Zealand.
The project procedures will be conducted in compliance with the European Union's (EU) General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and the Danish Data Protection Act. The project data may be used in other statistical and scientific projects approved by the internal (regional) data protection authorities or the Danish Data Protection Agency, with written permission from the main investigator for the current project. Other projects must report on data transmission from this project in their protocols. The transmitted data must be protected for identification of the individuals behind, e.g. by dissemination of the results. After project completion, all transmitted data must be archived and included in data collection in the definitive trial.
Biobank
A project biobank will be established in the Region Zealand Biobank for research purposes. Blood samples from adults with (at risk of) T2D will be obtained for monitoring blood glucose (Hb1Ac) before and after the intervention. The outcome is recommended for T2D studies and allows objective evaluation of health promotion planned in the research project. The biobank data is included in the applications sent to the Regional Committee on Health Research Ethics in Region Zealand, the Data Protection Agency in Region Zealand and the RIO at SDU.
Each blood sample will be attached to the personal project ID. Key codes will only be available for the research responsible during the ongoing research. By the end of the research activities (see the project timeline), all the biological materials used in the project and key codes will be destroyed. Subsequently, all the data will be anonymized and archived in Region Zealand. Anonymized excessive biological materials collected in this project will be stored in the Region Zealand Biobank for further unspecific research.
The participants will be informed of the blood sampling purpose and asked for their consent on delivering biological material to the biobank (see the project information leaflet and the informed consent form for adults). The consent will imply that relevant information from Hb1Ac analysis (values beyond the recommended range) will be registered in patient journal in Sundhedsplatformen with a note to the participant and his or her family physician right after obtaining the analysis results. Because monitoring of Hb1Ac is essential for T2D prevention, the participants will not be given the option to decline to receive the reports.
Risks and discomfort
The trial does not have any obvious health risks for the participants. Educated health professional assessors will supervise all the participants during assessment procedures.
Study setting
The Department for Physiotherapy and Occupational Therapy at Næstved-Slagelse-Ringsted Hospitals is leading and delivering the intervention in cooperation with SDCS. The six SDCS departments located in Slagelse, Næstved, and Holbæk will accommodate the intervention delivery.
Participants
Families (n=25) of at least two family members - minimum one adult and one child per family unit (appx. 100 individuals in total) will be included. A convenient study sample will be composed with no restriction to family types - traditional nuclear families, same-sex parenting families, single-parent families, or blended/ step-parent families). Balanced representation of different geographical areas within Region Zealand will be attempted.
Recruitment
The participants will be enrolled with help from already established research collaborators at the Department for Physiotherapy and Occupational Therapy at Næstved-Slagelse-Ringsted Hospitals who have contact to target population in general practice and municipal healthcare centers. Additionally, outpatient healthcare services for children and youth, local and social media, and public schools, will be involved.
Leaflets distributed through the study settings and news and social media will provide parents with contact information and access to a detailed project description and an invitation to an online information meeting in a secure VDX-video communication system, an educated project assistant will provide detailed oral information on participation. Phone or e-mail contacts will be answered by the project assistant. At least one week of thinking time will be given.
Families that have received detailed written and oral information on the project will be provided with access to a brief digital questionnaire designed for eligibility screening in the secure system RedCap. The eligibility screening shall be completed by each adult family member individually. The eligibility screening questionnaire will start with informed consent on participation in the project, before asking any questions on eligibility. Opened questionnaires with no consent will remain anonymous and registered as incomplete. Inconsistencies in the completed eligibility screening responses will be clarified by phone.
The informed consent will give the principal investigator and his representative access to information relevant to the project from journal records, e.g., medication lists, other treatments and adverse events, to ensure eligibility and support compliance during the intervention.
All the included families will participate in the intervention. Due to the study design and the intervention character, the participants, intervention deliverers, outcome assessors and statisticians cannot be blinded to treatment. A minimum of six participating families will be invited to the qualitative interviews after discharge from the intervention. Recruitment to the qualitative part of the study will be completed when data saturation is observed, expectedly at the maximum of ten family interviews.
Statistical considerations for the feasibility study
No sample size calculation will be performed. According to the rationale about feasibility, we considered a convenient sample of 25 families (appx. 100 individuals) would be sufficient to reach the boundaries in predefined research criteria and evaluate the intervention feasibility. Acceptable dropout of max. 20% is included in the sample size determined for this study. All the families will be invited to participate in the family interviews post-discharge. A minimum of 6 families will be attempted to be included in the family interviews to ensure data saturation.
Analysis
Quantitative analyses: According to the normality check results, the data will be described by mean ± SD or median (range) and analyzed for pre-post changes. Parametric or nonparametric statistics will be applied to the data analysis performed using the STATA 17.0 software (StataCorp, Texas, USA).
Qualitative analysis: The interview data will be transcribed verbatim and analyzed using thematic content analysis.
- Conditions
- Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Family Health, Health Behavior, Healthy Lifestyle, Prediabetic State, Telemedicine
- Being tested
- Healthy meals and physical activity in families with type 2 diabetes
- Medical subject headings
- Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Health Behavior, Prediabetic State
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Healthy meals and physical activity in families with type 2 diabetesBehavioural
Also called GO EASY: God ernæring og aktivitet for nye synergier i familier i Region Sjælland
Families will participate in telehealth family education on diabetes management and prevention through lifestyle modifications in their everyday occupations regarding current recommendations for physical activity, grocery shopping, meal preparation, and family meal routines. Each family will be assisted in setting tailored goals for the family as a whole and individually regarding physical activity and dieting habits. The goals will be incorporated into family daily routines, to secure manageability and sustainability of the new lifestyle habits. Local facilities and communy networks will be engaged in this process to empower and motivate the participants. Working with the goals will be monitored and facilitated throughout the intervention period of 3 months. Before discharge, each family will co-produce a maintenance plan for physical activity and healthy dieting.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Families with type 2 diabetes | Experimental | Families (n=25) of at least two family members - minimum one adult and one child per family unit (appx. 100 individuals in total) will be included. A convenient study sample will be composed with no restriction to family types - traditional nuclear families, same-sex parenting families, single-parent families, or blended/ step-parent families). Balanced representation of different geographical areas within Region Zealand will be attempted. Receives: Behavioral: Healthy meals and physical activity in families with type 2 diabetes |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Rate of the participants recruited per months
cf. predefined research progression criteria
Measured: 3 months
Rate of the participants recruited per months
cf. predefined research progression criteria
Measured: 6 months
Percentage of participants completed the intervention
cf. predefined research progression criteria
Measured: 3 months
Percentage of participants completed the intervention
cf. predefined research progression criteria
Measured: 6 months
Rate of participants' adherence to the intervention's sessions (attendance registration forms)
cf. predefined research progression criteria
Measured: 3 months
Rate of participants' adherence to the intervention's sessions (attendance registration forms)
cf. predefined research progression criteria
Measured: 6 months
Participants' self-perceived relevance (questionnaire, 5-items Likert scale, higher score is best)
cf. predefined research progression criteria
Measured: 3 months
Participants' self-perceived relevance (questionnaire, 5-items Likert scale, higher score is best)
cf. predefined research progression criteria
Measured: 6 months
Participants' self-perceived timing (questionnaire, 5-items Likert scale, higher score is best)
cf. predefined research progression criteria
Measured: 3 months
Participants' self-perceived timing (questionnaire, 5-items Likert scale, higher score is best)
cf. predefined research progression criteria
Measured: 6 months
Participants' self-perceived mode of delivery (questionnaire, 5-items Likert scale, higher score is best)
cf. predefined research progression criteria
Measured: 3 months
Participants' self-perceived mode of delivery (questionnaire, 5-items Likert scale, higher score is best)
cf. predefined research progression criteria
Measured: 6 months
Satisfaction with the treatment (questionnaire, 5-items Likert scale, higher score is best)
cf. predefined research progression criteria
Measured: 3 months
Satisfaction with the treatment (questionnaire, 5-items Likert scale, higher score is best)
cf. predefined research progression criteria
Measured: 6 months
Assessment procedure acceptance (questionnaire, 5-items Likert scale, higher score is best)
cf. predefined research progression criteria
Measured: 3 months
Assessment procedure acceptance (questionnaire, 5-items Likert scale, higher score is best)
cf. predefined research progression criteria
Measured: 6 months
Adverse events
cf. predefined research progression criteria
Measured: 3 months
Adverse events
cf. predefined research progression criteria
Measured: 6 months
Fidelity of delivery (questionnaire, 5-items Likert scale, higher score is best)
cf. predefined research progression criteria
Measured: 3 months
Fidelity of delivery (questionnaire, 5-items Likert scale, higher score is best)
cf. predefined research progression criteria
Measured: 6 months
Contextual appropriateness (questionnaire, 5-items Likert scale, higher score is best)
Treatment acceptance, cf. predefined research progression criteria
Measured: 3 months
Contextual appropriateness (questionnaire, 5-items Likert scale, higher score is best)
Treatment acceptance, cf. predefined research progression criteria
Measured: 6 months
Secondary outcomes (11)
Weekly physical activity, self-reported
physical activity time (hours and minutes)
Measured: Change from baseline to 6 months
Daily wake-time physical activity, objective
Physical activity time (hours and minutes) using Axivity AX3 accelerometer mounted on the right thigh for 7 days
Measured: Change from baseline to 6 months
Daily walking steps, objective
Step count using Axivity AX3 accelerometer mounted on the right thigh for 7 days
Measured: Change from baseline to 6 months
Dieting habits
generic questionnaire, weekly consumption of greens, fruits, meat and fish, and alcohol
Measured: Change from baseline to 6 months
Glucaemic control
Haemoglobin A1c blood test
Measured: Change from baseline to 6 months
BMI
calculated by division of self-reported data on body weight in kilograms by height in meters squared (only adults)
Measured: Change from baseline to 6 months
Activities of daily living
generic questionnaire, occupational performance problems (5-items Likert scale, higher score is worst)
Measured: Change from baseline to 6 months
Occupational balance
OBQ13 questionnaire -13 items measured, 6-step ordinal scales (higher score is best)
Measured: Change from baseline to 6 months
Self-perceived health today
EQ-5D-5L, EQ-VAS (0-100)
Measured: Change from baseline to 6 months
Health-related quality of life
EQ-5D-5L, EQ-Index - 5 dimensions: (1) mobility; (2) self-care; (3) usual activities; (4) pain/discomfort and (5) anxiety/depression, \& 5-level rating - Level 1: no problems; Level 2: slight problems; Level 3: moderate problems; Level 4: severe problems; Level 5: extreme problems (higher is worst)
Measured: Change from baseline to 6 months
Well-being
WHO5 questionnaire
Measured: Change from baseline to 6 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted23 Jan 2023
- Study start15 Jan 2024
- Primary completion31 Dec 2024
- Study completion31 Dec 2024
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2Studies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 18 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Slagelse Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Svetlana Solgaard Nielsen, Slagelse Hospital
- Investigators
- Svetlana Solgaard Nielsen, PhD, Principal investigator, Slagelse Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05694351
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 96452
- Acronym
- GO_EASY
- Status last verified
- May 2025
- First submitted
- 29 Dec 2022
- Last updated
- 18 May 2025
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Nielsen SS, Agerskov H, Skou ST, Sunddahl LDK, Kjaergaard E, Simony C. Enhancing personal capacities in families with or at risk of type 2 diabetes: qualitative investigation of the GO EASY intervention. BMC Public Health. 2026 Mar 13;26(1):1303. doi: 10.1186/s12889-026-26951-y.
PubMed 41826886
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 18 May 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- GO EASY: Eating Habits and Physical Activity in Synergy for Diabetes Prevention in Families
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05694351
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- GO_EASY / 96452
- Conditions
- Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Family Health, Health Behavior, Healthy Lifestyle, Prediabetic State, Telemedicine
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 18 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Slagelse HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 15 Jan 2024 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Dec 2024 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 Dec 2024 (actual)
- First posted
- 23 Jan 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Introduction: Type 2 diabetes represents a growing health risk for the society. An easy-access and low-cost intervention for the whole family will be developed to help families with (at risk of) type 2 diabetes maintain diabetes-frendly everyday life. The intervention will be tested for feasibility.
Methods: Following the framework for developing and conduct of complex interventions, the intervention will be developed on the basis of current evidence on family-based diabetes treatment and opinions of families with type 2 diabetes. The feasibility test will have embedded mixed methods one-group study design.
Participants: Families will answer a brief screening questionnaire. Families (n=25) that consist of at least one adult with (in risk of) type 2 diabetes living in the same household with at least one 5-18 yeard old child, and at least one family member living sedentary lifestyle, will participate.
Intervention: The 3-months long hybrid telehealth/face-to-face intervention with weekly 1-hour contacts with health professionals will deliver diabetes education and tailored support to implement more physical activity and healthy meals in the family everyday life. A 3-months long supervised maintenance phase with monthly professional contacts will be included.
Outcomes: Feasibility evaluation will be conducted using quantitative (quantifiable) and qualitative research methods. The feasibility data will be the primary outcomes of the study, collected and evaluated using the predefined research progression criteria applied the green-amber-red method. Sociodemography and secondary outcomes, such as physical activity, dieting habits, daily occupations, occupational balance, health and quality of life will be assessed at baseline and 3 and 6-months follow-ups. The quantitative results will be comprehended through qualitative data from participant interviews which will nuance the feasibility evaluation.
Analysis: Relevant statistical methods and qualitative analysis method will be applied.
Expected results: The intervention will help families achieve sustainable lifestyle changes, e.g., diabetes stabilized blood glucose in adults with type 2 diabetes, increased physical activity time and improved dieting habits, for better family health and well-being.
Ethics and dissemination: The trial does not have any obvious health risks for the participants. All the results - significant, non-significant and/ or inconclusive - will be reported.
Detailed description
Note: T2D means type 2 diabetes
Design
The GO EASY intervention is an easy-access and low-cost intervention promoting physical activity and healthier meals in families with (at risk of) T2D. The intervention will be developed and tested for feasibility, following the recommendations on developing and conducting complex interventions from the Medical Research Council (MRC) framework.
Feasibility evaluation of the intervention will be conducted using quantitative (quantifiable) and qualitative research methods. The quantitative results will be comprehended through qualitative data which will help a nuanced in-depth evaluation of feasibility from participant and clinical perspectives.
For the quantitative (quantifiable) data collection on feasibility, predefined research progression criteria will be determined, and the green-amber-red method will be applied. The green-amber-red method with the categories GREEN (Proceed with the RCT/ implementation), AMBER (Proceed, but changes to the protocol need to be discussed and solved) and RED (Do not proceed unless the problem can be solved) will help evaluate the readiness of the intervention to be tested for effectiveness in an RCT. Parameters relevant to T2D research, i.e., dieting habits, routines, and physical activity, will be monitored and assessed before and after the intervention. Several families will participate in objective physical activity assessments using technological devices (activity trackers).
Min. 10 - max. 20 qualitative family interviews will study the mechanisms of what is at stake during changing health behavior within participating families. Families who earned the experiences with the activity tracker technology will be invited to share their experiences in a separate qualitative interview-based study in a walk-and-talk format to explore the acceptability and usability of the devices.
Data privacy and ethical concerns
The project follows the principles of The World Medical Association (WMA) described in the WMA Declaration of Helsinki. The ethical approval of the project is sought at The Regional Committee on Health Research Ethics in Region Zealand (Denmark). The Data Protection Agency in Region Zealand (reg.) and the Research \& Innovation Organization (RIO) at the University of Southern Denmark (SDU) are sought for approval of the project. The use of activity trackers (Garmin) has been approved by the IT-Concern in Region Zealand.
The project procedures will be conducted in compliance with the European Union's (EU) General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and the Danish Data Protection Act. The project data may be used in other statistical and scientific projects approved by the internal (regional) data protection authorities or the Danish Data Protection Agency, with written permission from the main investigator for the current project. Other projects must report on data transmission from this project in their protocols. The transmitted data must be protected for identification of the individuals behind, e.g. by dissemination of the results. After project completion, all transmitted data must be archived and included in data collection in the definitive trial.
Biobank
A project biobank will be established in the Region Zealand Biobank for research purposes. Blood samples from adults with (at risk of) T2D will be obtained for monitoring blood glucose (Hb1Ac) before and after the intervention. The outcome is recommended for T2D studies and allows objective evaluation of health promotion planned in the research project. The biobank data is included in the applications sent to the Regional Committee on Health Research Ethics in Region Zealand, the Data Protection Agency in Region Zealand and the RIO at SDU.
Each blood sample will be attached to the personal project ID. Key codes will only be available for the research responsible during the ongoing research. By the end of the research activities (see the project timeline), all the biological materials used in the project and key codes will be destroyed. Subsequently, all the data will be anonymized and archived in Region Zealand. Anonymized excessive biological materials collected in this project will be stored in the Region Zealand Biobank for further unspecific research.
The participants will be informed of the blood sampling purpose and asked for their consent on delivering biological material to the biobank (see the project information leaflet and the informed consent form for adults). The consent will imply that relevant information from Hb1Ac analysis (values beyond the recommended range) will be registered in patient journal in Sundhedsplatformen with a note to the participant and his or her family physician right after obtaining the analysis results. Because monitoring of Hb1Ac is essential for T2D prevention, the participants will not be given the option to decline to receive the reports.
Risks and discomfort
The trial does not have any obvious health risks for the participants. Educated health professional assessors will supervise all the participants during assessment procedures.
Study setting
The Department for Physiotherapy and Occupational Therapy at Næstved-Slagelse-Ringsted Hospitals is leading and delivering the intervention in cooperation with SDCS. The six SDCS departments located in Slagelse, Næstved, and Holbæk will accommodate the intervention delivery.
Participants
Families (n=25) of at least two family members - minimum one adult and one child per family unit (appx. 100 individuals in total) will be included. A convenient study sample will be composed with no restriction to family types - traditional nuclear families, same-sex parenting families, single-parent families, or blended/ step-parent families). Balanced representation of different geographical areas within Region Zealand will be attempted.
Recruitment
The participants will be enrolled with help from already established research collaborators at the Department for Physiotherapy and Occupational Therapy at Næstved-Slagelse-Ringsted Hospitals who have contact to target population in general practice and municipal healthcare centers. Additionally, outpatient healthcare services for children and youth, local and social media, and public schools, will be involved.
Leaflets distributed through the study settings and news and social media will provide parents with contact information and access to a detailed project description and an invitation to an online information meeting in a secure VDX-video communication system, an educated project assistant will provide detailed oral information on participation. Phone or e-mail contacts will be answered by the project assistant. At least one week of thinking time will be given.
Families that have received detailed written and oral information on the project will be provided with access to a brief digital questionnaire designed for eligibility screening in the secure system RedCap. The eligibility screening shall be completed by each adult family member individually. The eligibility screening questionnaire will start with informed consent on participation in the project, before asking any questions on eligibility. Opened questionnaires with no consent will remain anonymous and registered as incomplete. Inconsistencies in the completed eligibility screening responses will be clarified by phone.
The informed consent will give the principal investigator and his representative access to information relevant to the project from journal records, e.g., medication lists, other treatments and adverse events, to ensure eligibility and support compliance during the intervention.
All the included families will participate in the intervention. Due to the study design and the intervention character, the participants, intervention deliverers, outcome assessors and statisticians cannot be blinded to treatment. A minimum of six participating families will be invited to the qualitative interviews after discharge from the intervention. Recruitment to the qualitative part of the study will be completed when data saturation is observed, expectedly at the maximum of ten family interviews.
Statistical considerations for the feasibility study
No sample size calculation will be performed. According to the rationale about feasibility, we considered a convenient sample of 25 families (appx. 100 individuals) would be sufficient to reach the boundaries in predefined research criteria and evaluate the intervention feasibility. Acceptable dropout of max. 20% is included in the sample size determined for this study. All the families will be invited to participate in the family interviews post-discharge. A minimum of 6 families will be attempted to be included in the family interviews to ensure data saturation.
Analysis
Quantitative analyses: According to the normality check results, the data will be described by mean ± SD or median (range) and analyzed for pre-post changes. Parametric or nonparametric statistics will be applied to the data analysis performed using the STATA 17.0 software (StataCorp, Texas, USA).
Qualitative analysis: The interview data will be transcribed verbatim and analyzed using thematic content analysis.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Families with type 2 diabetes | Experimental | Behavioral: Healthy meals and physical activity in families with type 2 diabetesFamilies (n=25) of at least two family members - minimum one adult and one child per family unit (appx. 100 individuals in total) will be included. A convenient study sample will be composed with no restriction to family types - traditional nuclear families, same-sex parenting families, single-parent families, or blended/ step-parent families). Balanced representation of different geographical areas within Region Zealand will be attempted. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 5 to 99 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Parents (aged 18 or older) with (or at risk of) type 2 diabetes living in the same household with 5-17 years old children
- At least one family member not meeting the current physical activity recommendations.
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Pregnancy or postpartum period (6 months after birth)
- Current critical illness, e.g. cancer
- Participating in other type 2 diabetes treatment programs
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Healthy meals and physical activity in families with type 2 diabetesAlso: GO EASY: God ernæring og aktivitet for nye synergier i familier i Region SjællandFamilies will participate in telehealth family education on diabetes management and prevention through lifestyle modifications in their everyday occupations regarding current recommendations for physical activity, grocery shopping, meal preparation, and family meal routines. Each family will be assisted in setting tailored goals for the family as a whole and individually regarding physical activity and dieting habits. The goals will be incorporated into family daily routines, to secure manageability and sustainability of the new lifestyle habits. Local facilities and communy networks will be engaged in this process to empower and motivate the participants. Working with the goals will be monitored and facilitated throughout the intervention period of 3 months. Before discharge, each family will co-produce a maintenance plan for physical activity and healthy dieting. | Behavioural | Families with type 2 diabetes |
Primary outcome
Rate of the participants recruited per months
Time frame: 3 months
cf. predefined research progression criteria
Rate of the participants recruited per months
Time frame: 6 months
cf. predefined research progression criteria
Percentage of participants completed the intervention
Time frame: 3 months
cf. predefined research progression criteria
Percentage of participants completed the intervention
Time frame: 6 months
cf. predefined research progression criteria
Rate of participants' adherence to the intervention's sessions (attendance registration forms)
Time frame: 3 months
cf. predefined research progression criteria
Rate of participants' adherence to the intervention's sessions (attendance registration forms)
Time frame: 6 months
cf. predefined research progression criteria
Participants' self-perceived relevance (questionnaire, 5-items Likert scale, higher score is best)
Time frame: 3 months
cf. predefined research progression criteria
Participants' self-perceived relevance (questionnaire, 5-items Likert scale, higher score is best)
Time frame: 6 months
cf. predefined research progression criteria
Participants' self-perceived timing (questionnaire, 5-items Likert scale, higher score is best)
Time frame: 3 months
cf. predefined research progression criteria
Participants' self-perceived timing (questionnaire, 5-items Likert scale, higher score is best)
Time frame: 6 months
cf. predefined research progression criteria
Participants' self-perceived mode of delivery (questionnaire, 5-items Likert scale, higher score is best)
Time frame: 3 months
cf. predefined research progression criteria
Participants' self-perceived mode of delivery (questionnaire, 5-items Likert scale, higher score is best)
Time frame: 6 months
cf. predefined research progression criteria
Satisfaction with the treatment (questionnaire, 5-items Likert scale, higher score is best)
Time frame: 3 months
cf. predefined research progression criteria
Satisfaction with the treatment (questionnaire, 5-items Likert scale, higher score is best)
Time frame: 6 months
cf. predefined research progression criteria
Assessment procedure acceptance (questionnaire, 5-items Likert scale, higher score is best)
Time frame: 3 months
cf. predefined research progression criteria
Assessment procedure acceptance (questionnaire, 5-items Likert scale, higher score is best)
Time frame: 6 months
cf. predefined research progression criteria
Adverse events
Time frame: 3 months
cf. predefined research progression criteria
Adverse events
Time frame: 6 months
cf. predefined research progression criteria
Fidelity of delivery (questionnaire, 5-items Likert scale, higher score is best)
Time frame: 3 months
cf. predefined research progression criteria
Fidelity of delivery (questionnaire, 5-items Likert scale, higher score is best)
Time frame: 6 months
cf. predefined research progression criteria
Contextual appropriateness (questionnaire, 5-items Likert scale, higher score is best)
Time frame: 3 months
Treatment acceptance, cf. predefined research progression criteria
Contextual appropriateness (questionnaire, 5-items Likert scale, higher score is best)
Time frame: 6 months
Treatment acceptance, cf. predefined research progression criteria
11 secondary outcomes
Weekly physical activity, self-reported
Time frame: Change from baseline to 6 months
Daily wake-time physical activity, objective
Time frame: Change from baseline to 6 months
Daily walking steps, objective
Time frame: Change from baseline to 6 months
Dieting habits
Time frame: Change from baseline to 6 months
Glucaemic control
Time frame: Change from baseline to 6 months
BMI
Time frame: Change from baseline to 6 months
Activities of daily living
Time frame: Change from baseline to 6 months
Occupational balance
Time frame: Change from baseline to 6 months
Self-perceived health today
Time frame: Change from baseline to 6 months
Health-related quality of life
Time frame: Change from baseline to 6 months
Well-being
Time frame: Change from baseline to 6 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 18 May 2025.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 41826886Nielsen SS, Agerskov H, Skou ST, Sunddahl LDK, Kjaergaard E, Simony C. Enhancing personal capacities in families with or at risk of type 2 diabetes: qualitative investigation of the GO EASY intervention. BMC Public Health. 2026 Mar 13;26(1):1303. doi: 10.1186/s12889-026-26951-y.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
Efficacy and Safety of Once-Weekly SHR-3167 Compared With Once-Daily Insulin Glargine in Adults With Insulin-Naive Type 2 Diabetes
Type 2 Diabetes
Active, not recruiting
Digital Reinforcement of Motivational Interviewing Micro-Skills Among Primary Care Healthcare Professionals
Hypertension (Without Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus)
Recruiting
Investigating Vascular Properties of HEMI and SPG Signals in Individuals With or at Risk for Chronic Kidney Disease
Chronic Kidney Disease, Hypertension (HTN)
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
A Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness and Safety of the Drug AZD6234 for Managing Weight in Adults Who Are Obese or Overweight. These Participants May or May Not Also Have Type 2 Diabetes
Obesity, Overweight
Not yet recruiting
Impact of Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty (ESG) in Obese Adults With Type 2 Diabetes (T2D)
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2D), Obesity (BMI>30)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Svetlana Solgaard Nielsen, PhD principal investigator
Slagelse Hospital
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Healthy meals and physical activity in families with type 2 diabetes in people with Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 and Family Health, run by Slagelse Hospital at 1 site in Denmark.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 May 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Denmark. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Rate of the participants recruited per months (time frame: 3 months). The study lists 22 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05694351, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 May 2025.