Nutrition Disorders in Old AgeNUTRICARENCT05691595
Attitudes, Knowledge, Self-efficacy, and Behaviors of Nurses in Nutritional Care for Older People
An observational study of Nutrition Disorders in Old Age, run by IRCCS Policlinico S. Donato at 2 sites in Italy.
Trial summary
Even if awareness among nurses regarding the importance of nutritional care for older people has increased in recent years, nurses continue to underestimate the necessary approach to prevent malnutrition. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Nutrition Disorders in Old Age
- What is being tested?
- Online survey data collection
- How many people
- 179 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesItaly
- Study dates
- 1 Jun 2022to 1 Oct 2025
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: In general, the study sampling is comprised of nurses with more than six months of experience working in the same ward and who have solid background in nutritional care intervention for the elderly.
Who may be able to join
- to be a nurse;
- aged ≥ 18 years;
- full-time work contract;
- work experience: more than six months of experience in the same ward;
- work experience in nutritional care for older people (people aged 60 years and older).
Who cannot join
- not available to participate in the study;
- not compiling the informed consent (via the same web-survey);
- working in critical care settings (e.g., intensive care units, emergency demertments);
- working in outpatient settings.
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country.
Italy2 sites
ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda
Milan, 20162
IRCCS Policlinico San Donato
San Donato Milanese, Milan, 20097
About this study
Official title: Attitudes, Knowledge, Self-efficacy, and Behaviors of Nurses in NUTRItional CARE for Older People: an Observational Study (the NUTRICARE Project)
Even if awareness among nurses regarding the importance of nutritional care for older people has increased in recent years, nurses continue to underestimate the necessary approach to prevent malnutrition. Therefore, some authors have argued the critical importance of understanding which factors can influence nurses' caring behaviors during real situations and affect the prevention and management of malnutrition under actual working conditions. Specifically, the relationship between nurses' attitudes, knowledge, and self-efficacy in nutritional care for older people has not been described yet. Understanding these relationships can provide a framework to enhance adequate caring behaviors, mitigating the negative attitudes.
Considering that self-efficacy has been previously theorized in several populations as the mediator of the relationship from knowledge and attitudes to specific behaviors, the investigators hypothesized that knowledge and attitudes in the specific area of nursing nutritional care have moderately positive effects on nursing caring behaviors in nutritional care only through the mediation of nursing self-efficacy.
The study design is a multi-phase, descriptive observational cross-sectional, multicentric study, collecting data using a web-survey.
Read the detailed description
Background and rationale
Malnutrition in older people is still an unsolved issue, affecting from 3.1% among outpatients to 29.4% in rehabilitation/sub-acute settings. To date, empirical evidence shows that malnutrition in older people cause a higher risk of disability and loss of autonomy and increase morbidity and mortality. For this reason, prevention of malnutrition should be a priority of health professionals in the care and cure of older patients, and nurses are in a strategic position to prevent malnutrition in older people because they are the only health professionals who look after the patients 24/24 and 7/7. However, several studies report that the quality of nutritional care is often under the standard in clinical settings, underlining that the major barriers to nutritional care, from the nurses' point of view, were: loneliness in nutritional care, a need for competence in nutritional care, low flexibility in foodservice practices, system failure in nutritional care and the neglect of nutritional care.
In this regard, it is possible to hypothesize several key factors underpinning the nursing nutritional competencies that could influence the quality of nutritional care delivery, such as knowledge, attitudes, and self-efficacy. Indeed, numerous authors have described that a lack of knowledge about the key elements of good nutritional care is fundamental to delivering care with high quality, as lead them to underestimate the consequences of its inadequacy. Literature explained that a lack of knowledge of the important concepts of malnutrition could lead to an underestimation of the phenomenon and to behaviors that do not prevent the onset of malnutrition. Therefore, it is crucial to measure the level of the health professional's knowledge on these matters to implement targeted training, although recent literature reported an improvement in this regard. A further factor that could influence the quality of care is the attitude of nurses toward nutritional care. Indeed, previous evidence identified that the proper screening for malnourished patients and implementing corrective strategies with the multidisciplinary team are essential aspects of the nursing competencies . Unfortunately, literature reports that nurses often have a negative attitude toward nutritional care because they often perceive nutritional care as a secondary responsibility. These negative attitudes can cause underestimating malnutrition, which can remain undetected, increasing the risk of negative health-related outcomes in older adults.
Finally, self-efficacy, defined as the beliefs that people have in their ability to successfully complete complex tasks, can be considered a proxy for nursing job performance, and its perceived level by nurses could influence the quality of nutritional care. In fact, according to Bandura, self-efficacy is a predictor of performance, which can be modified through appropriate educational and motivational interventions, mediating between the level of both knowledge and attitudes with action. In this regard, Dellafiore et al. developed a self-efficacy scale for nurses to assess the nutritional care of older adults to make it possible to measure nurses' self-efficacy in nutritional care (as a proxy assessment of nursing competencies in nutritional care) and, consequently, evaluate its improvement by specific interventions.
Data collection and sample size
The collected data will be sent into an electronic data collector, whose output will be saved as an eCRF file in REDCap. The start and end of the data collection are scheduled for June 2022 and June 2023, respectively.
Thus far, it is known that the correlation between knowledge and attitudes regarding nutritional nursing care is moderately positive (r = 0.410; p<0.001), while the correlations between knowledge, attitude with self-efficacy, and behaviors are mainly undescribed. As per our hypothesis, knowledge and attitudes with self-efficacy and behaviors might show moderate positive correlations. Thus, the investigators hypothesize that the weakest correlation (out of the total of six in the posited model) could be approximately r = 0.25. According to Hulley et al. (2013), a total sample size required to determine whether a correlation coefficient differs from zero has to meet the following criteria: N = [(Zα+Zβ)/C]2 +3; where N is the sample size, α = 0.05/6 (0.0083) considering a Bonferroni correction for performing six tests of hypotheses, and therefore Zα = 2.40, β = 10% and then Zβ = 1.28, C = 0.5 * ln[(1 + r)/(1 - r)] = 0.5*ln[(1 + 0.25)/(1 - 0.25)] = 0.5 * ln[1.67] = 0.5 * 0.51 = 0.26. Consequently, [(2.40+1.28)/0.26]2 +3 = 203. Therefore, 203 nurses should be enrolled to determine whether the correlation coefficients differ from zero.
The data collection will be performed with the following questionnaires in a self-reporting format via web-survey:
- Socio-demographic variables, such as sex (male, female), age (years), and marital status (married, unmarried, other)
- Professional characteristics are: postgraduate education (yes, no), clinical setting (chronic care settings, acute care settings), work experience (years), nutritional care to older adults (routine care, infrequent care)
- Staff Attitudes to Nutritional Nursing Care Geriatric scale (SANN-G scale)
- Knowledge of Malnutrition- Geriatric (KoM-G)
- Self-efficacy Scale for Nursing Nutrition Care (SE-NNC)
Statistical analysis
All the data will be checked using the frequency distribution to assess possible missing, errors or outliers. Descriptive statistics will be used to describe the sample characteristics, where categorical data will be presented as frequencies, and continuous data will be presented as means ± standard deviation (M±SD) for normally distributed variables and as the median and interquartile range (25°-75° percentile) for continues data non-normally distributed. The study of skewness will be used to preliminary assess the normal distribution of the variables, followed by the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. Missing data will be managed using a pairwise approach. The sample characteristics will be compared between and within groups and using Pearson's χ2 test for dichotomous variables in the univariate analysis or using The Student's t-test (or one-way ANOVA when appropriate) for parametric values.
For the preliminary Aim, the Bartlett's test will be used to assess the correlation matrix's factorability and the Kaiser-Mayer-Olkin (KMO) index will be performed before running an exploratory factor analysis (EFA). EFAs will be performed using robust maximum likelihood parameter estimates (MLR) in the case of non-normally distributed items or robust maximum likelihood (ML) in the case of normally-distributed items. A geomin oblique rotation will be used for facilitating the interpretation of the relationships between latent factors and observed variables. The selection of the number of factors to be extracted will be guided by analyzing the eigenvalues, the scree test, the interpretation of the relationships between latent factors and observed variables, and the theoretical domains conceptualized in the items' generation phase.
Structural equation modelings will be run according to the posited hypothesis to investigate the main Aim. The models will be evaluated considering the interpretation of the following indices of fit: the Satorra-Bentler χ2; the comparative fit index (CFI) (values >0.90 indicated an acceptable fit); the root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) (values <0.06 indicated an acceptable fit); the weighted root mean square residual (WRMR; values 1.0 indicated an acceptable fit).
All data will be analyzed using Statistical Package for Social Science version 22 (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA) and MPLus 8.1, and the level of significance will be set at 0.05 and two-tailed.
Expected results
This study will provide useful information to firstly understand and determine the relationship between attitudes, knowledge, self-efficacy, and behaviors of nurses in nutritional care for older people. So far, this topic has been under-investigated, and this study will provide helpful information to answer a gap in knowledge.
Data management
All data collected anonymously through the web-survey will be processed following current legislation (European Regulation 2016/679, Legislative Decree 101/2018) and the GCP, respecting the participating subjects' privacy. The data will be automatically entered into an online binder after each patient completes the questionnaire. Once the collection phase is complete, the binder will be extrapolated into an Excel sheet for analysis purposes. The Excel output will also be deposited in REDCap.
Ethical considerations
Prior to the compilation of the web-survey, the informed consent will be obtained online on the same page. The study can be described as anonymous because it is impossible to link any particular sample to a person based on the obtained data. It is not considered necessary to employ a separate written informed permission for this sort of study, according to current legislation (European Regulation 2016/679, Legislative Decree 101/2018), because it would cease to exist the study's confidentiality. On the other hand, it is thought to prioritize properly informing subjects with a clear and understandable presentation webpage that explains the survey's purpose before they complete the online questionnaire.
- Conditions
- Nutrition Disorders in Old Age
- Being tested
- Online survey data collection
- Keywords
- Nurses, Attitudes, Knowledge, Self-efficacy, Nutritional care, Elderly
- Medical subject headings
- Behavior
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Online survey data collectionOther
The data will be collected via a web-survey created with the SurveyMonkey® software. The web-survey will be distributed among nurses at IRCCS Policlinico San Donato (San Donato Milanese, Italy) and ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda (Milan, Italy).
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
To describe the relationship of attitudes (measured using the SANN-G scale) with knowledge and self-efficacy of nurses in delivering nutritional care for older people
The attitudes will be measured with the Staff Attitudes to Nutritional Nursing Care Geriatric scale (SANN-G scale). The SANN G scale consists of 18 statements, which the respondent can answer on a five-point Likert scale from 'Strongly Agree' to 'Strongly Disagree'. The SANN-G scale is based on the theory of planned behavior by Ajzen (1991). The original scale investigates the attitudes of nurses to five factors related to nutritional care, identified in the literature as critical for high-quality care. The authors of the original instrument also validated the cut-off for a positive attitude to each factor. The five factors, with their ranges and cut-offs for positive attitudes, are: norms, habits, assessment, intervention, individualization.
Measured: June 2022 - December 2023
To describe the relationship of knowledge (measured using the KoM-G scale) with attitudes and self-efficacy of nurses in delivering nutritional care for older people
The knowledge will be measured with the Knowledge of Malnutrition- Geriatric (KoM-G), a questionnaire that consists of 19 multiple-choice questions about malnutrition in older people, with six possible answers, one of which is "I don't know". Each of the other five answers can be right or wrong. The question is considered correct if all the answers are correctly marked. A correct answer assigns 6 points; an incorrect answer is 1 point. The score goes from a minimum of 19 points to a maximum of 114 points; no cut-off will be specified). The Italian version of the tool showed good psychometric properties (ICC coefficient for the total scores=0.981; Kuder-Richardson 20 test=0.914).
Measured: June 2022 - December 2023
To describe the relationship of self-efficacy (measured using the SE-NNC scale) with attitudes and knowledge of nurses in delivering nutritional care for older people.
The self-efficacy of nurses to assess nutritional care will be measured using the self-efficacy scale for nursing nutrition care (SE-NNC). SE-NNC is a self-report tool encompassing 27 items and measuring self-efficacy in boosting knowledge (regarding nutritional care), assessment and evidence utilization, and care delivery. Each domain requires to be computed standardizing the responses in a 0-100 score, where the higher self-efficacy scores indicate greater self-efficacy levels. A total self-efficacy score might be computed. In the validation study, the SE-NNC showed adequate internal consistency for each domain and the overall scale (Cronbach's α ranged from 0.879 to 0.963).
Measured: June 2022 - December 2023
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted20 Jan 2023
- Study start1 Jun 2022
- Primary completion30 Sep 2025
- Study completion1 Oct 2025
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (29)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Nutrition Disorders in Old AgeStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by IRCCS Policlinico S. DonatoThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Other
- Time perspective
- Cross-sectional
- Enrolment
- 179 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- IRCCS Policlinico S. Donato
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Gianluca Conte, IRCCS Policlinico S. Donato
- Investigators
- Rosario Caruso, Study director, IRCCS Policlinico S. Donato
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05691595
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 74/INT/2022
- Acronym
- NUTRICARE
- Status last verified
- Oct 2025
- First submitted
- 10 Jan 2023
- Last updated
- 2 Oct 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: Data collected will be the property of the Promoter (i.e., IRCCS Policlinico San Donato). The results of this study will be disseminated through peer-review publications or other scientific communication such as abstracts, short communications, or posters, in compliance with applicable copyright law, also crediting the authors of the guide.
Publications
Ayre, C., & Scally, A. J. (2014). Critical values for Lawshe's content validity ratio: revisiting the original methods of calculation. Measurement and evaluation in counseling and development, 47(1), 79-86.
Bachrach-Lindstrom M, Jensen S, Lundin R, Christensson L. Attitudes of nursing staff working with older people towards nutritional nursing care. J Clin Nurs. 2007 Nov;16(11):2007-14. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01868.x. Epub 2007 Apr 5.
PubMed 17419794Bandura A. Guide for constructing self-efficacy scales. Self-efficacy beliefs Adolesc. 2006. doi:10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
Bassola B, Tommasi V, Bonetti L, Bauer S, Lusignani M. Nurses' knowledge about malnutrition in older people: A multicenter cross-sectional study. Nutrition. 2020 Oct;78:110947. doi: 10.1016/j.nut.2020.110947. Epub 2020 Jul 18.
PubMed 32861178Bauer S, Halfens RJ, Lohrmann C. Knowledge and Attitudes of Nursing Staff Towards Malnutrition Care in Nursing Homes: A Multicentre Cross-Sectional Study. J Nutr Health Aging. 2015 Aug;19(7):734-40. doi: 10.1007/s12603-015-0535-7.
PubMed 26193856Bjerrum M, Tewes M, Pedersen P. Nurses' self-reported knowledge about and attitude to nutrition -- before and after a training programme. Scand J Caring Sci. 2012 Mar;26(1):81-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6712.2011.00906.x. Epub 2011 Jul 1.
PubMed 21718341Boaz M, Rychani L, Barami K, Houri Z, Yosef R, Siag A, Berlovitz Y, Leibovitz E. Nurses and nutrition: a survey of knowledge and attitudes regarding nutrition assessment and care of hospitalized elderly patients. J Contin Educ Nurs. 2013 Aug;44(8):357-64. doi: 10.3928/00220124-20130603-89. Epub 2013 Jun 10.
PubMed 23758072Bollo M, Terzoni S, Ferrara P, Destrebecq A, Bonetti L. Nursing students' attitudes towards nutritional care of older people: A multicentre cross-sectional survey incorporating a pre post design. Nurse Educ Today. 2019 Jul;78:19-24. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2019.03.016. Epub 2019 Apr 17.
PubMed 31029954Bonetti L, Bagnasco A, Aleo G, Sasso L. 'The transit of the food trolley'- malnutrition in older people and nurses' perception of the problem. Scand J Caring Sci. 2013 Jun;27(2):440-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6712.2012.01043.x. Epub 2012 Jul 30.
PubMed 22846143Bonetti L, Terzoni S, Lusignani M, Negri M, Froldi M, Destrebecq A. Prevalence of malnutrition among older people in medical and surgical wards in hospital and quality of nutritional care: A multicenter, cross-sectional study. J Clin Nurs. 2017 Dec;26(23-24):5082-5092. doi: 10.1111/jocn.14051. Epub 2017 Sep 29.
PubMed 28833723Casanova N, Bagnasco A, Bonetti L, Sasso L. [Nurses' attitudes towards nutritional care and malnutrition in hospitalised older people: A Survey in the Liguria Region]. Prof Inferm. 2015 Oct-Dec;68(4):219-26. doi: 10.7429/pi.2015.684219. Italian.
PubMed 26752313Cereda E, Pedrolli C, Klersy C, Bonardi C, Quarleri L, Cappello S, Turri A, Rondanelli M, Caccialanza R. Nutritional status in older persons according to healthcare setting: A systematic review and meta-analysis of prevalence data using MNA(R). Clin Nutr. 2016 Dec;35(6):1282-1290. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2016.03.008. Epub 2016 Apr 6.
PubMed 27086194Dellafiore F, Caruso R, Arrigoni C, Magon A, Baroni I, Alotto G, Quaccini C, Bianchi M, Bonetti L. The development of a self-efficacy scale for nurses to assess the nutritional care of older adults: A multi-phase study. Clin Nutr. 2021 Mar;40(3):1260-1267. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2020.08.008. Epub 2020 Aug 14.
PubMed 32839036DiMaria-Ghalili RA, Mirtallo JM, Tobin BW, Hark L, Van Horn L, Palmer CA. Challenges and opportunities for nutrition education and training in the health care professions: intraprofessional and interprofessional call to action. Am J Clin Nutr. 2014 May;99(5 Suppl):1184S-93S. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.113.073536. Epub 2014 Mar 19.
PubMed 24646823Donini LM, Stephan BCM, Rosano A, Molfino A, Poggiogalle E, Lenzi A, Siervo M, Muscaritoli M. What Are the Risk Factors for Malnutrition in Older-Aged Institutionalized Adults? Nutrients. 2020 Sep 18;12(9):2857. doi: 10.3390/nu12092857.
PubMed 32961917
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 2 Oct 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Attitudes, Knowledge, Self-efficacy, and Behaviors of Nurses in NUTRItional CARE for Older People: an Observational Study (the NUTRICARE Project)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05691595
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- NUTRICARE / 74/INT/2022
- Conditions
- Nutrition Disorders in Old Age
- Keywords
- Nurses, Attitudes, Knowledge, Self-efficacy, Nutritional care, Elderly
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 179 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- IRCCS Policlinico S. DonatoUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda
- Study start
- 1 Jun 2022 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Sep 2025 (actual)
- Study completion
- 1 Oct 2025 (actual)
- First posted
- 20 Jan 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Even if awareness among nurses regarding the importance of nutritional care for older people has increased in recent years, nurses continue to underestimate the necessary approach to prevent malnutrition. Therefore, some authors have argued the critical importance of understanding which factors can influence nurses' caring behaviors during real situations and affect the prevention and management of malnutrition under actual working conditions. Specifically, the relationship between nurses' attitudes, knowledge, and self-efficacy in nutritional care for older people has not been described yet. Understanding these relationships can provide a framework to enhance adequate caring behaviors, mitigating the negative attitudes.
Considering that self-efficacy has been previously theorized in several populations as the mediator of the relationship from knowledge and attitudes to specific behaviors, the investigators hypothesized that knowledge and attitudes in the specific area of nursing nutritional care have moderately positive effects on nursing caring behaviors in nutritional care only through the mediation of nursing self-efficacy.
The study design is a multi-phase, descriptive observational cross-sectional, multicentric study, collecting data using a web-survey.
Detailed description
Background and rationale
Malnutrition in older people is still an unsolved issue, affecting from 3.1% among outpatients to 29.4% in rehabilitation/sub-acute settings. To date, empirical evidence shows that malnutrition in older people cause a higher risk of disability and loss of autonomy and increase morbidity and mortality. For this reason, prevention of malnutrition should be a priority of health professionals in the care and cure of older patients, and nurses are in a strategic position to prevent malnutrition in older people because they are the only health professionals who look after the patients 24/24 and 7/7. However, several studies report that the quality of nutritional care is often under the standard in clinical settings, underlining that the major barriers to nutritional care, from the nurses' point of view, were: loneliness in nutritional care, a need for competence in nutritional care, low flexibility in foodservice practices, system failure in nutritional care and the neglect of nutritional care.
In this regard, it is possible to hypothesize several key factors underpinning the nursing nutritional competencies that could influence the quality of nutritional care delivery, such as knowledge, attitudes, and self-efficacy. Indeed, numerous authors have described that a lack of knowledge about the key elements of good nutritional care is fundamental to delivering care with high quality, as lead them to underestimate the consequences of its inadequacy. Literature explained that a lack of knowledge of the important concepts of malnutrition could lead to an underestimation of the phenomenon and to behaviors that do not prevent the onset of malnutrition. Therefore, it is crucial to measure the level of the health professional's knowledge on these matters to implement targeted training, although recent literature reported an improvement in this regard. A further factor that could influence the quality of care is the attitude of nurses toward nutritional care. Indeed, previous evidence identified that the proper screening for malnourished patients and implementing corrective strategies with the multidisciplinary team are essential aspects of the nursing competencies . Unfortunately, literature reports that nurses often have a negative attitude toward nutritional care because they often perceive nutritional care as a secondary responsibility. These negative attitudes can cause underestimating malnutrition, which can remain undetected, increasing the risk of negative health-related outcomes in older adults.
Finally, self-efficacy, defined as the beliefs that people have in their ability to successfully complete complex tasks, can be considered a proxy for nursing job performance, and its perceived level by nurses could influence the quality of nutritional care. In fact, according to Bandura, self-efficacy is a predictor of performance, which can be modified through appropriate educational and motivational interventions, mediating between the level of both knowledge and attitudes with action. In this regard, Dellafiore et al. developed a self-efficacy scale for nurses to assess the nutritional care of older adults to make it possible to measure nurses' self-efficacy in nutritional care (as a proxy assessment of nursing competencies in nutritional care) and, consequently, evaluate its improvement by specific interventions.
Data collection and sample size
The collected data will be sent into an electronic data collector, whose output will be saved as an eCRF file in REDCap. The start and end of the data collection are scheduled for June 2022 and June 2023, respectively.
Thus far, it is known that the correlation between knowledge and attitudes regarding nutritional nursing care is moderately positive (r = 0.410; p<0.001), while the correlations between knowledge, attitude with self-efficacy, and behaviors are mainly undescribed. As per our hypothesis, knowledge and attitudes with self-efficacy and behaviors might show moderate positive correlations. Thus, the investigators hypothesize that the weakest correlation (out of the total of six in the posited model) could be approximately r = 0.25. According to Hulley et al. (2013), a total sample size required to determine whether a correlation coefficient differs from zero has to meet the following criteria: N = [(Zα+Zβ)/C]2 +3; where N is the sample size, α = 0.05/6 (0.0083) considering a Bonferroni correction for performing six tests of hypotheses, and therefore Zα = 2.40, β = 10% and then Zβ = 1.28, C = 0.5 * ln[(1 + r)/(1 - r)] = 0.5*ln[(1 + 0.25)/(1 - 0.25)] = 0.5 * ln[1.67] = 0.5 * 0.51 = 0.26. Consequently, [(2.40+1.28)/0.26]2 +3 = 203. Therefore, 203 nurses should be enrolled to determine whether the correlation coefficients differ from zero.
The data collection will be performed with the following questionnaires in a self-reporting format via web-survey:
- Socio-demographic variables, such as sex (male, female), age (years), and marital status (married, unmarried, other)
- Professional characteristics are: postgraduate education (yes, no), clinical setting (chronic care settings, acute care settings), work experience (years), nutritional care to older adults (routine care, infrequent care)
- Staff Attitudes to Nutritional Nursing Care Geriatric scale (SANN-G scale)
- Knowledge of Malnutrition- Geriatric (KoM-G)
- Self-efficacy Scale for Nursing Nutrition Care (SE-NNC)
Statistical analysis
All the data will be checked using the frequency distribution to assess possible missing, errors or outliers. Descriptive statistics will be used to describe the sample characteristics, where categorical data will be presented as frequencies, and continuous data will be presented as means ± standard deviation (M±SD) for normally distributed variables and as the median and interquartile range (25°-75° percentile) for continues data non-normally distributed. The study of skewness will be used to preliminary assess the normal distribution of the variables, followed by the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. Missing data will be managed using a pairwise approach. The sample characteristics will be compared between and within groups and using Pearson's χ2 test for dichotomous variables in the univariate analysis or using The Student's t-test (or one-way ANOVA when appropriate) for parametric values.
For the preliminary Aim, the Bartlett's test will be used to assess the correlation matrix's factorability and the Kaiser-Mayer-Olkin (KMO) index will be performed before running an exploratory factor analysis (EFA). EFAs will be performed using robust maximum likelihood parameter estimates (MLR) in the case of non-normally distributed items or robust maximum likelihood (ML) in the case of normally-distributed items. A geomin oblique rotation will be used for facilitating the interpretation of the relationships between latent factors and observed variables. The selection of the number of factors to be extracted will be guided by analyzing the eigenvalues, the scree test, the interpretation of the relationships between latent factors and observed variables, and the theoretical domains conceptualized in the items' generation phase.
Structural equation modelings will be run according to the posited hypothesis to investigate the main Aim. The models will be evaluated considering the interpretation of the following indices of fit: the Satorra-Bentler χ2; the comparative fit index (CFI) (values >0.90 indicated an acceptable fit); the root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) (values <0.06 indicated an acceptable fit); the weighted root mean square residual (WRMR; values 1.0 indicated an acceptable fit).
All data will be analyzed using Statistical Package for Social Science version 22 (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA) and MPLus 8.1, and the level of significance will be set at 0.05 and two-tailed.
Expected results
This study will provide useful information to firstly understand and determine the relationship between attitudes, knowledge, self-efficacy, and behaviors of nurses in nutritional care for older people. So far, this topic has been under-investigated, and this study will provide helpful information to answer a gap in knowledge.
Data management
All data collected anonymously through the web-survey will be processed following current legislation (European Regulation 2016/679, Legislative Decree 101/2018) and the GCP, respecting the participating subjects' privacy. The data will be automatically entered into an online binder after each patient completes the questionnaire. Once the collection phase is complete, the binder will be extrapolated into an Excel sheet for analysis purposes. The Excel output will also be deposited in REDCap.
Ethical considerations
Prior to the compilation of the web-survey, the informed consent will be obtained online on the same page. The study can be described as anonymous because it is impossible to link any particular sample to a person based on the obtained data. It is not considered necessary to employ a separate written informed permission for this sort of study, according to current legislation (European Regulation 2016/679, Legislative Decree 101/2018), because it would cease to exist the study's confidentiality. On the other hand, it is thought to prioritize properly informing subjects with a clear and understandable presentation webpage that explains the survey's purpose before they complete the online questionnaire.
Study design
- Observational model
- Other
- Time perspective
- Cross-sectional
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- In general, the study sampling is comprised of nurses with more than six months of experience working in the same ward and who have solid background in nutritional care intervention for the elderly.
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- to be a nurse;
- aged ≥ 18 years;
- full-time work contract;
- work experience: more than six months of experience in the same ward;
- work experience in nutritional care for older people (people aged 60 years and older).
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- not available to participate in the study;
- not compiling the informed consent (via the same web-survey);
- working in critical care settings (e.g., intensive care units, emergency demertments);
- working in outpatient settings.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Online survey data collectionThe data will be collected via a web-survey created with the SurveyMonkey® software. The web-survey will be distributed among nurses at IRCCS Policlinico San Donato (San Donato Milanese, Italy) and ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda (Milan, Italy). | Other | – |
Primary outcome
To describe the relationship of attitudes (measured using the SANN-G scale) with knowledge and self-efficacy of nurses in delivering nutritional care for older people
Time frame: June 2022 - December 2023
The attitudes will be measured with the Staff Attitudes to Nutritional Nursing Care Geriatric scale (SANN-G scale). The SANN G scale consists of 18 statements, which the respondent can answer on a five-point Likert scale from 'Strongly Agree' to 'Strongly Disagree'. The SANN-G scale is based on the theory of planned behavior by Ajzen (1991). The original scale investigates the attitudes of nurses to five factors related to nutritional care, identified in the literature as critical for high-quality care. The authors of the original instrument also validated the cut-off for a positive attitude to each factor. The five factors, with their ranges and cut-offs for positive attitudes, are: norms, habits, assessment, intervention, individualization.
To describe the relationship of knowledge (measured using the KoM-G scale) with attitudes and self-efficacy of nurses in delivering nutritional care for older people
Time frame: June 2022 - December 2023
The knowledge will be measured with the Knowledge of Malnutrition- Geriatric (KoM-G), a questionnaire that consists of 19 multiple-choice questions about malnutrition in older people, with six possible answers, one of which is "I don't know". Each of the other five answers can be right or wrong. The question is considered correct if all the answers are correctly marked. A correct answer assigns 6 points; an incorrect answer is 1 point. The score goes from a minimum of 19 points to a maximum of 114 points; no cut-off will be specified). The Italian version of the tool showed good psychometric properties (ICC coefficient for the total scores=0.981; Kuder-Richardson 20 test=0.914).
To describe the relationship of self-efficacy (measured using the SE-NNC scale) with attitudes and knowledge of nurses in delivering nutritional care for older people.
Time frame: June 2022 - December 2023
The self-efficacy of nurses to assess nutritional care will be measured using the self-efficacy scale for nursing nutrition care (SE-NNC). SE-NNC is a self-report tool encompassing 27 items and measuring self-efficacy in boosting knowledge (regarding nutritional care), assessment and evidence utilization, and care delivery. Each domain requires to be computed standardizing the responses in a 0-100 score, where the higher self-efficacy scores indicate greater self-efficacy levels. A total self-efficacy score might be computed. In the validation study, the SE-NNC showed adequate internal consistency for each domain and the overall scale (Cronbach's α ranged from 0.879 to 0.963).
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 2 Oct 2025.
- BackgroundAyre, C., & Scally, A. J. (2014). Critical values for Lawshe's content validity ratio: revisiting the original methods of calculation. Measurement and evaluation in counseling and development, 47(1), 79-86.
- Background: PubMed 17419794Bachrach-Lindstrom M, Jensen S, Lundin R, Christensson L. Attitudes of nursing staff working with older people towards nutritional nursing care. J Clin Nurs. 2007 Nov;16(11):2007-14. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01868.x. Epub 2007 Apr 5.
- BackgroundBandura A. Guide for constructing self-efficacy scales. Self-efficacy beliefs Adolesc. 2006. doi:10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
- Background: PubMed 32861178Bassola B, Tommasi V, Bonetti L, Bauer S, Lusignani M. Nurses' knowledge about malnutrition in older people: A multicenter cross-sectional study. Nutrition. 2020 Oct;78:110947. doi: 10.1016/j.nut.2020.110947. Epub 2020 Jul 18.
- Background: PubMed 26193856Bauer S, Halfens RJ, Lohrmann C. Knowledge and Attitudes of Nursing Staff Towards Malnutrition Care in Nursing Homes: A Multicentre Cross-Sectional Study. J Nutr Health Aging. 2015 Aug;19(7):734-40. doi: 10.1007/s12603-015-0535-7.
- Background: PubMed 21718341Bjerrum M, Tewes M, Pedersen P. Nurses' self-reported knowledge about and attitude to nutrition -- before and after a training programme. Scand J Caring Sci. 2012 Mar;26(1):81-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6712.2011.00906.x. Epub 2011 Jul 1.
- Background: PubMed 23758072Boaz M, Rychani L, Barami K, Houri Z, Yosef R, Siag A, Berlovitz Y, Leibovitz E. Nurses and nutrition: a survey of knowledge and attitudes regarding nutrition assessment and care of hospitalized elderly patients. J Contin Educ Nurs. 2013 Aug;44(8):357-64. doi: 10.3928/00220124-20130603-89. Epub 2013 Jun 10.
- Background: PubMed 31029954Bollo M, Terzoni S, Ferrara P, Destrebecq A, Bonetti L. Nursing students' attitudes towards nutritional care of older people: A multicentre cross-sectional survey incorporating a pre post design. Nurse Educ Today. 2019 Jul;78:19-24. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2019.03.016. Epub 2019 Apr 17.
- Background: PubMed 22846143Bonetti L, Bagnasco A, Aleo G, Sasso L. 'The transit of the food trolley'- malnutrition in older people and nurses' perception of the problem. Scand J Caring Sci. 2013 Jun;27(2):440-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6712.2012.01043.x. Epub 2012 Jul 30.
- Background: PubMed 28833723Bonetti L, Terzoni S, Lusignani M, Negri M, Froldi M, Destrebecq A. Prevalence of malnutrition among older people in medical and surgical wards in hospital and quality of nutritional care: A multicenter, cross-sectional study. J Clin Nurs. 2017 Dec;26(23-24):5082-5092. doi: 10.1111/jocn.14051. Epub 2017 Sep 29.
- Background: PubMed 26752313Casanova N, Bagnasco A, Bonetti L, Sasso L. [Nurses' attitudes towards nutritional care and malnutrition in hospitalised older people: A Survey in the Liguria Region]. Prof Inferm. 2015 Oct-Dec;68(4):219-26. doi: 10.7429/pi.2015.684219. Italian.
- Background: PubMed 27086194Cereda E, Pedrolli C, Klersy C, Bonardi C, Quarleri L, Cappello S, Turri A, Rondanelli M, Caccialanza R. Nutritional status in older persons according to healthcare setting: A systematic review and meta-analysis of prevalence data using MNA(R). Clin Nutr. 2016 Dec;35(6):1282-1290. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2016.03.008. Epub 2016 Apr 6.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. Data collected will be the property of the Promoter (i.e., IRCCS Policlinico San Donato). The results of this study will be disseminated through peer-review publications or other scientific communication such as abstracts, short communications, or posters, in compliance with applicable copyright law, also crediting the authors of the guide.
Related trials for Nutrition Disorders in Old Age
RecruitingObservational study
Effects of Obesity on Physical Abilities and Daily Living Activities in Elderly Adults
Obesity, Sarcopenic Obesity
Recruiting
Perioperative Multicomponent Rehabilitation and Outcomes in Elderly Patients With Frailty
Old Age; Debility, Digestive Cancer
Recruiting
Multimodal Intervention for Weight Management and Health in the Elderly Population
Obesity & Overweight
Active, not recruiting
Sustainable Exercise and Nutrition Programs for Managing Metabolic Disorders in Older Women
Metabolic Syndrome, Aging
RecruitingObservational study
Nutritional Status and Patient Characteristics Upon Length of Stay, Clinical Outcome, and Survival in Older Hospitalized Patients
Geriatric, Malnutrition
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Rosario Caruso study director
IRCCS Policlinico S. Donato
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Nutrition Disorders in Old Age, run by IRCCS Policlinico S. Donato at 2 sites in Italy.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 2 Oct 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
To describe the relationship of attitudes (measured using the SANN-G scale) with knowledge and self-efficacy of nurses in delivering nutritional care for older people (time frame: June 2022 - December 2023). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05691595, which also lists 29 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 2 Oct 2025.