Endometrial NeoplasmsMANECNCT05687084
Uterine Manipulator Versus no Uterine Manipulator in Endometrial Cancer Trial
A study testing Uterine manipulator use in people with Endometrial Neoplasms, run by Universita di Verona at 3 sites in Italy.
Trial summary
Minimally invasive surgery is the recommended approach in endometrial cancer (EC) patients based on the results of two randomized controlled trials, given its advantages without compromised oncologic outcomes. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 100 years, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Endometrial Neoplasms
- What is being tested?
- Uterine manipulator use
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 1,030 participants
- Where
- 3 sitesItaly
- Study dates
- 16 Jan 2023to 31 Dec 2031
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 100 years
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Diagnosis of Endometrial Cancer of any histology (including carcinosarcoma) and grade
- Planned surgical treatment including hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (ovarian preservation in selected patients is not an exclusion criterion)
- Age ≥ 18 years
- No preoperative evidence of extrauterine disease (Clinical stage IIIA, IIIB)
- No preoperative evidence of suspicious lymph nodes (Clinical stage IIIC)
- No preoperative evidence of distant metastasis (Clinical stage IV)
- Approved and signed informed consent
Who cannot join
- Neoadjuvant therapy
- Synchronous or previous (< 5 years) invasive cancer, not including non-melanoma skin cancer
- Fertility preservation
- World Health Organization performance score > 2
- Uterine sarcoma
- Previous pelvic/abdominal radiotherapy, hormone therapy for cancer (< 5 years), chemotherapy (< 5 years), pelvic or paraaortic lymphadenectomy, or retroperitoneal surgery
Show all 10Show fewer
- Inadequate bone marrow function (white blood cells <3·0×109/L, platelets <100×109/L)
- Inadequate liver function (bilirubin >1.5×upper normal limit [UNL], aspartate aminotransferase, and alanine aminotransferase >2.5 × UNL)
- Inadequate kidney function (creatinine clearance < 60 mL per min calculated according to Cockcroft-Gault 10 or < 50 mL per min Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid clearance)
- Intraoperative evidence of stage IV disease
Trial locations and contacts
3 sites in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Italy3 sites, 3 recruiting
- Recruiting
UOC Ostetricia e Ginecologia, Azienda Ospedaliera Santa Croce e Carle
Cuneo, Italy, 12100
Andrea Puppo, Dr., 00000000000, puppo.a@ospedale.cuneo.it
- Recruiting
UOC Ostetricia e Ginecologia, Arcispedale Santa Maria Nuova
Reggio Emilia
Vincenzo Dario Mandato, Dr., 000000000, VincenzoDario.Mandato@ausl.re.it
- Recruiting
AOUI Verona - University of Verona - Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Verona, 37125
Simone Garzon, MD
About this study
Official title: Randomized Controlled Trial on the Oncologic Outcomes of Use Versus Not Use of the Uterine Manipulator in the Surgical Treatment of Apparent Uterine-confined Endometrial Carcinoma
Minimally invasive surgery is the recommended approach in endometrial cancer (EC) patients based on the results of two randomized controlled trials, given its advantages without compromised oncologic outcomes. The uterine manipulator is commonly used in benign and malignant pathologies to perform a laparoscopic or robotic hysterectomy. However, although regularly used, the uterine manipulator adoption in EC is a controversial technical aspect due to the raised concerns regarding the possible risk of disruption of the tumor mass, the spread of malignant cells, and seeding of the disease, particularly at the level of the vaginal cuff or spread of tumor cells, with increased risk of recurrence and death due to EC. On that basis, given that hysterectomy without a uterine manipulator is feasible, only a randomized controlled trial comparing oncologic outcomes in EC patients after use versus not use of the uterine manipulator will be able to provide high-quality evidence to answer this critical question and allow or exclude the use of a uterine manipulator during minimally invasive hysterectomy for EC.
- Conditions
- Endometrial Neoplasms
- Being tested
- Uterine manipulator use
- Keywords
- Endometrial Neoplasms, Uterine manipulator, Laparoscopic hysterectomy, Recurrence-free survival, Cause-specific survival, Overall survival, Oncologic outcomes
- Medical subject headings
- Endometrial Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Uterine manipulator useDevice
The uterine manipulator will be inserted into the uterus to assist in the procedure of total hysterectomy.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Total hysterectomy with a uterine manipulator | Experimental | Total hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy performed with the use of a uterine manipulator during surgery. Receives: Device: Uterine manipulator use |
| Total hysterectomy without a uterine manipulator | No intervention | Total hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy performed without the use of a uterine manipulator during surgery. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Recurrence-free survival
Any recurrence or death related to endometrial cancer (EC) or treatment
Measured: Each follow-up visit, up to 4 years from the day of surgery
Secondary outcomes (9)
Cause-specific survival
Any death related to endometrial cancer (EC) or treatment
Measured: Each follow-up visit, up to 4 years from the day of surgery
Overall survival
Any death for any cause
Measured: Each follow-up visit, up to 4 years from the day of surgery
Site-specific recurrence-free survival
Any recurrence per site of first recurrence
Measured: Each follow-up visit, up to 4 years from the day of surgery
Operative time
Time between first incision and skin closure
Measured: Day of surgery
Intraoperative blood loss
Total blood aspirate during the surgical procedure
Measured: Day of surgery
30-day post-surgical morbidity
Perioperative (intraoperative and postoperative) complications graded based on the Clavien-Dindo classification
Measured: 30 days after surgery
Lymphovascular space invasion
Presence of lymphovascular space invasion at definitive pathology
Measured: Day of surgery
Peritoneal cytology
Presence of positive peritoneal cytology at definitive pathology
Measured: Day of surgery
Quality of life indexes
The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - General (FACT-G) - A 27-item questionnaire designed to measure four domains of Health-Related Quality of Life in cancer patients: Physical, social, emotional, and functional well-being. Score range 0-108. The higher the score, the better the Quality of Life.
Measured: Each follow-up visit, up to 4 years from the day of surgery
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted17 Jan 2023
- Study start16 Jan 2023
- Primary completion31 Dec 2031 (estimated)
- Study completion31 Dec 2031 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (6)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Endometrial NeoplasmsStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Multicenter, parallel arms, open-label, randomized controlled trial.
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 1,030 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Universita di Verona
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Stefano Uccella, Universita di Verona
- Investigators
- Stefano Uccella, MD, PhD, Principal investigator, AOUI Verona - University of VeronaSimone Garzon, MD, Principal investigator, AOUI Verona - University of VeronaPier Carlo Zorzato, MD, Principal investigator, AOUI Verona - University of Verona
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05687084
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- MANEC Trial
- Acronym
- MANEC
- Status last verified
- Apr 2026
- First submitted
- 6 Nov 2022
- Last updated
- 5 May 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Concin N, Matias-Guiu X, Vergote I, Cibula D, Mirza MR, Marnitz S, Ledermann J, Bosse T, Chargari C, Fagotti A, Fotopoulou C, Gonzalez Martin A, Lax S, Lorusso D, Marth C, Morice P, Nout RA, O'Donnell D, Querleu D, Raspollini MR, Sehouli J, Sturdza A, Taylor A, Westermann A, Wimberger P, Colombo N, Planchamp F, Creutzberg CL. ESGO/ESTRO/ESP guidelines for the management of patients with endometrial carcinoma. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2021 Jan;31(1):12-39. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2020-002230. Epub 2020 Dec 18.
PubMed 33397713van den Haak L, Alleblas C, Nieboer TE, Rhemrev JP, Jansen FW. Efficacy and safety of uterine manipulators in laparoscopic surgery: a review. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2015 Nov;292(5):1003-11. doi: 10.1007/s00404-015-3727-9. Epub 2015 May 13.
PubMed 25967852Uccella S, Cianci S, Gueli Alletti S. Uterine manipulator in endometrial cancer: we are still far from the answer. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Mar;224(3):332. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.09.049. Epub 2020 Nov 15. No abstract available.
PubMed 33207238Uccella S, Bonzini M, Malzoni M, Fanfani F, Palomba S, Aletti G, Corrado G, Ceccaroni M, Seracchioli R, Shakir F, Ferrero A, Berretta R, Tinelli R, Vizza E, Roviglione G, Casarella L, Volpi E, Cicinelli E, Scambia G, Ghezzi F. The effect of a uterine manipulator on the recurrence and mortality of endometrial cancer: a multi-centric study by the Italian Society of Gynecological Endoscopy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Jun;216(6):592.e1-592.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.01.027. Epub 2017 Jan 29.
PubMed 28147240Padilla-Iserte P, Lago V, Tauste C, Diaz-Feijoo B, Gil-Moreno A, Oliver R, Coronado P, Martin-Salamanca MB, Pantoja-Garrido M, Marcos-Sanmartin J, Gilabert-Estelles J, Lorenzo C, Cazorla E, Roldan-Rivas F, Rodriguez-Hernandez JR, Sanchez L, Muruzabal JC, Hervas D, Domingo S; Spanish Society of Gynecology and Obstetrics Spanish Investigational Network Gynecologic Oncology Group. Impact of uterine manipulator on oncological outcome in endometrial cancer surgery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Jan;224(1):65.e1-65.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.07.025. Epub 2020 Jul 18.
PubMed 32693096Uccella S, Puppo A, Ghezzi F, Zorzato PC, Ceccaroni M, Mandato VD, Berretta R, Camanni M, Seracchioli R, Perrone AM, Chiantera V, Vizzielli G, Sozzi G, Beretta P, Steinkasserer M, Legge F, Stevenazzi G, Candotti G, Bergamini V, Fanfani F, Garzon S. A randomized controlled trial on the oncologic outcomes of use of the intrauterine manipulator in the treatment of apparent uterine-confined endometrial carcinoma: the MANEC Trial. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2024 Dec 2;34(12):1971-1975. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2024-005668.
PubMed 39266205
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 5 May 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Randomized Controlled Trial on the Oncologic Outcomes of Use Versus Not Use of the Uterine Manipulator in the Surgical Treatment of Apparent Uterine-confined Endometrial Carcinoma
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05687084
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- MANEC / MANEC Trial
- Conditions
- Endometrial Neoplasms
- Keywords
- Endometrial Neoplasms, Uterine manipulator, Laparoscopic hysterectomy, Recurrence-free survival, Cause-specific survival, Overall survival, Oncologic outcomes
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 1,030 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Universita di VeronaUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 16 Jan 2023 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Dec 2031 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 31 Dec 2031 (estimated)
- First posted
- 17 Jan 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Minimally invasive surgery is the recommended approach in endometrial cancer (EC) patients based on the results of two randomized controlled trials, given its advantages without compromised oncologic outcomes. The uterine manipulator is commonly used in benign and malignant pathologies to perform a laparoscopic or robotic hysterectomy. However, although regularly used, the uterine manipulator adoption in EC is a controversial technical aspect due to the raised concerns regarding the possible risk of disruption of the tumor mass, the spread of malignant cells, and seeding of the disease, particularly at the level of the vaginal cuff or spread of tumor cells, with increased risk of recurrence and death due to EC. On that basis, given that hysterectomy without a uterine manipulator is feasible, only a randomized controlled trial comparing oncologic outcomes in EC patients after use versus not use of the uterine manipulator will be able to provide high-quality evidence to answer this critical question and allow or exclude the use of a uterine manipulator during minimally invasive hysterectomy for EC.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Multicenter, parallel arms, open-label, randomized controlled trial.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Total hysterectomy with a uterine manipulator | Experimental | Device: Uterine manipulator useTotal hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy performed with the use of a uterine manipulator during surgery. |
| Total hysterectomy without a uterine manipulator | No intervention | –Total hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy performed without the use of a uterine manipulator during surgery. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 100 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Diagnosis of Endometrial Cancer of any histology (including carcinosarcoma) and grade
- Planned surgical treatment including hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (ovarian preservation in selected patients is not an exclusion criterion)
- Age ≥ 18 years
- No preoperative evidence of extrauterine disease (Clinical stage IIIA, IIIB)
- No preoperative evidence of suspicious lymph nodes (Clinical stage IIIC)
Key exclusion criteria (10 listed)
- Neoadjuvant therapy
- Synchronous or previous (< 5 years) invasive cancer, not including non-melanoma skin cancer
- Fertility preservation
- World Health Organization performance score > 2
- Uterine sarcoma
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Uterine manipulator useThe uterine manipulator will be inserted into the uterus to assist in the procedure of total hysterectomy. | Device | Total hysterectomy with a uterine manipulator |
Primary outcome
Recurrence-free survival
Time frame: Each follow-up visit, up to 4 years from the day of surgery
Any recurrence or death related to endometrial cancer (EC) or treatment
9 secondary outcomes
Cause-specific survival
Time frame: Each follow-up visit, up to 4 years from the day of surgery
Overall survival
Time frame: Each follow-up visit, up to 4 years from the day of surgery
Site-specific recurrence-free survival
Time frame: Each follow-up visit, up to 4 years from the day of surgery
Operative time
Time frame: Day of surgery
Intraoperative blood loss
Time frame: Day of surgery
30-day post-surgical morbidity
Time frame: 30 days after surgery
Lymphovascular space invasion
Time frame: Day of surgery
Peritoneal cytology
Time frame: Day of surgery
Quality of life indexes
Time frame: Each follow-up visit, up to 4 years from the day of surgery
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 5 May 2026.
- Background: PubMed 33397713Concin N, Matias-Guiu X, Vergote I, Cibula D, Mirza MR, Marnitz S, Ledermann J, Bosse T, Chargari C, Fagotti A, Fotopoulou C, Gonzalez Martin A, Lax S, Lorusso D, Marth C, Morice P, Nout RA, O'Donnell D, Querleu D, Raspollini MR, Sehouli J, Sturdza A, Taylor A, Westermann A, Wimberger P, Colombo N, Planchamp F, Creutzberg CL. ESGO/ESTRO/ESP guidelines for the management of patients with endometrial carcinoma. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2021 Jan;31(1):12-39. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2020-002230. Epub 2020 Dec 18.
- Background: PubMed 25967852van den Haak L, Alleblas C, Nieboer TE, Rhemrev JP, Jansen FW. Efficacy and safety of uterine manipulators in laparoscopic surgery: a review. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2015 Nov;292(5):1003-11. doi: 10.1007/s00404-015-3727-9. Epub 2015 May 13.
- Background: PubMed 33207238Uccella S, Cianci S, Gueli Alletti S. Uterine manipulator in endometrial cancer: we are still far from the answer. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Mar;224(3):332. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.09.049. Epub 2020 Nov 15. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 28147240Uccella S, Bonzini M, Malzoni M, Fanfani F, Palomba S, Aletti G, Corrado G, Ceccaroni M, Seracchioli R, Shakir F, Ferrero A, Berretta R, Tinelli R, Vizza E, Roviglione G, Casarella L, Volpi E, Cicinelli E, Scambia G, Ghezzi F. The effect of a uterine manipulator on the recurrence and mortality of endometrial cancer: a multi-centric study by the Italian Society of Gynecological Endoscopy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Jun;216(6):592.e1-592.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.01.027. Epub 2017 Jan 29.
- Background: PubMed 32693096Padilla-Iserte P, Lago V, Tauste C, Diaz-Feijoo B, Gil-Moreno A, Oliver R, Coronado P, Martin-Salamanca MB, Pantoja-Garrido M, Marcos-Sanmartin J, Gilabert-Estelles J, Lorenzo C, Cazorla E, Roldan-Rivas F, Rodriguez-Hernandez JR, Sanchez L, Muruzabal JC, Hervas D, Domingo S; Spanish Society of Gynecology and Obstetrics Spanish Investigational Network Gynecologic Oncology Group. Impact of uterine manipulator on oncological outcome in endometrial cancer surgery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Jan;224(1):65.e1-65.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.07.025. Epub 2020 Jul 18.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 39266205Uccella S, Puppo A, Ghezzi F, Zorzato PC, Ceccaroni M, Mandato VD, Berretta R, Camanni M, Seracchioli R, Perrone AM, Chiantera V, Vizzielli G, Sozzi G, Beretta P, Steinkasserer M, Legge F, Stevenazzi G, Candotti G, Bergamini V, Fanfani F, Garzon S. A randomized controlled trial on the oncologic outcomes of use of the intrauterine manipulator in the treatment of apparent uterine-confined endometrial carcinoma: the MANEC Trial. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2024 Dec 2;34(12):1971-1975. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2024-005668.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Endometrial Neoplasms
Recruiting
Methylation Profiling in Self-Samples for Identification of (Epi)Genetic Biomarkers for Gynecological Cancers
Gynaecological Cancers, Ovarian Cancer
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
Endometrial Cancer Patientes MMR Deficient Comparing Chemotherapy vs Dostarlimab in First Line
Endometrial Cancer
RecruitingPhase 3
Testing the Addition of an Antiangiogenic Drug (Bevacizumab) to Chemotherapy (Carboplatin and Paclitaxel) Combined With Immunotherapy (Pembrolizumab) for pMMR, TP53 Mutated Endometrial Cancer
Advanced Endometrial Carcinoma, Recurrent Endometrial Carcinoma
RecruitingPhase 2
At-Home Cancer Directed Therapy Versus in Clinic for the Treatment of Patients With Advanced Cancer
Advanced Anal Carcinoma, Advanced Biliary Tract Carcinoma
RecruitingPhase 3
Impact of Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping on Patient Reported Lower Extremity Limb Dysfunction in Stage I Endometrial Cancer
Stage I Uterine Corpus Carcinoma or Carcinosarcoma AJCC v8
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Stefano Uccella, MD, PhD principal investigator
AOUI Verona - University of Verona
Simone Garzon, MD principal investigator
AOUI Verona - University of Verona
Pier Carlo Zorzato, MD principal investigator
AOUI Verona - University of Verona
3 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Uterine manipulator use in people with Endometrial Neoplasms, run by Universita di Verona at 3 sites in Italy.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 May 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 3 sites in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Stefano Uccella, MD, PhD (0039 045 812 2720, stefano.uccella@univr.it), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Recurrence-free survival (time frame: Each follow-up visit, up to 4 years from the day of surgery). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05687084, which also lists 6 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 May 2026.