Burn Degree SecondEarly Phase 1NCT05652816
Biological Skin Graft With Keratinocyte-stem Cell Co-cultre for Burn Patients
A Early Phase 1 study testing Split-thickness skin graft, Artificial skin graft and Artificial skin graft co-culture in people with Burn Degree Second and Burn Degree Third, run by Universitas Indonesia at 1 site in Indonesia.
Trial summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to test whether artificial skin graft can substitute autologous skin graft in current burn treatment. The main question it aims to answer is: Can artificial skin graft result in better wound healing compared to the current burn treatment; autologous skin graft? You will: Undergo… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 55 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Burn Degree Second, Burn Degree Third
- What is being tested?
- Split-thickness skin graft, Artificial skin graft and Artificial skin graft co-culture
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 20 participants
- Where
- 1 siteIndonesia
- Study dates
- 6 Sep 2022to 31 Dec 2024
- Phase
- Early Phase 1
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 55 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Aged 18 - 55
- Area of burn <50%
- Acute phase burn (<120 hrs)
- Have not undergo any surgery for burn treatment
Who cannot join
- Immunocompromised
- Have comorbidities
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Indonesia1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
RSUPN Cipto Mangunkusumo
Jakarta Pusat, DKI Jakarta, 10430
Aditya Wardhana, MD, +6287880021350, aditya_wrdn@yahoo.com
Normalina Sandora, PhD, +6281298963425, normalina.sandora@gmail.com
About this study
Official title: Substitute Graft for Burns Using Biological Graft Seeded With Autologous Keratinocyte Co-cultured With Stem Cells
The goal of this clinical trial is to test whether artificial skin graft can substitute autologous skin graft in current burn treatment. The main question it aims to answer is:
- Can artificial skin graft result in better wound healing compared to the current burn treatment; autologous skin graft?
You will:
- Undergo debridement surgery
- Receive artificial skin graft as an alternative to autologous skin graft
- Undergo biopsy procedure of burn area
If there is a comparison group: Researchers will compare autologous skin graft group to see the wound healing process
Read the detailed description
Burn caused by working accidents occurs mostly in the male population of productive age (68.68%). Up to this date, the only treatment for grade 2B-3 burns patients in Indonesia is skin transplantation taken from their own body (autologous skin graft). This treatment has several drawbacks in which repeated surgery is sometimes necessary, the source of skin in patients with wide area of burn is limited, and patients that are in the elder age and have comorbidities have high mortality risk.
In order to find an alternative for autologous skin graft therapy, a combination of tissue engineering and stem cell therapy is used to invent an artificial skin graft. The present study attempts to evaluate the efficacy of artificial skin graft seeded with autologous keratinocyte and stem cells towards wound healing in burn patients. The artificial graft used in this study is amnion bilayer; a graft that was decellularized to remove donor's cells and then layered to form into 3-D.
To evaluate the efficacy, biopsies are taken from the burn area of patients to evaluate the histoarchitecture of patients' tissue by histological staining (H\&E and Movat's pentachrome, IHC collagen I, collagen III, vWF, and alpha-SMA) and measure the relative gene expression by qPCR. For clinical data, burn area calculation using Rule of 9 method and thermography measurement using FLIRONE. Furthermore, systemic evaluation of patients are done by monitoring the procalcitonin, lactate, mean arterial pressure, gradation of wound, and sensory of burn area. The evaluation and measurement mentioned above are then compared to patients treated with the current available therapy; autologous skin graft. The artificial skin graft is hoped to result in equal, if not better, wound healing in burn patients compared to autologous skin graft. The investigators hope that artificial skin graft can be an option, other than autologous skin graft, in treating burn patients in the future.
- Conditions
- Burn Degree Second, Burn Degree Third
- Being tested
- Split-thickness skin graft, Artificial skin graft, Artificial skin graft co-culture
- Keywords
- artificial skin graft, keratinocyte, amnion epithelial stem cells, burn
- Medical subject headings
- Burns
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Split-thickness skin graftProcedure or surgery
Transplantation of autologous skin to burn area
Artificial skin graftBiological
Decellularized amnion membrane formed into 3-D matrix
Artificial skin graft co-cultureBiological
Decellularized amnion membrane formed into 3-D matrix seeded with autologous keratinocyte co-cultured with amnion epithelial stem cells
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| STSG (Split-Thickness Skin Graft) | Sham comparator | Patients treated with the standard treatment; autologous skin graft Receives: Procedure: Split-thickness skin graft |
| Amnion Bilayer Only | Experimental | Patients treated with artificial graft only Receives: Biological: Artificial skin graft |
| Amnion Bilayer seeded with co-culture | Experimental | Patients treated with artificial graft seeded with autologous keratinocyte co-cultured with amnion epithelial stem cells Receives: Biological: Artificial skin graft co-culture |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Burn thickness
Thickness of burn evaluation using Rule of 9
Measured: Day of surgery
Burn thickness
Thickness of burn evaluation using Rule of 9
Measured: Day 7 after surgery
Burn thickness
Thickness of burn evaluation using Rule of 9
Measured: Day 14 after surgery
Burn thermography
Thermography evaluation using FLIRONE
Measured: Day of surgery
Burn thermography
Thermography evaluation using FLIRONE
Measured: Day 7 after surgery
Burn thermography
Thermography evaluation using FLIRONE
Measured: Day 14 after surgery
Systemic clinical evaluation
Mean arterial pressure measurement
Measured: Day of surgery
Systemic clinical evaluation
Mean arterial pressure measurement
Measured: Day 7 after surgery
Systemic clinical evaluation
Mean arterial pressure measurement
Measured: Day 14 after surgery
Systemic clinical evaluation
lactate measurement
Measured: Day of surgery
Systemic clinical evaluation
lactate measurement
Measured: Day 7 after surgery
Systemic clinical evaluation
lactate measurement
Measured: Day 14 after surgery
Systemic clinical evaluation
procalcitonin measurement
Measured: Day of surgery
Systemic clinical evaluation
procalcitonin measurement
Measured: Day 7 after surgery
Systemic clinical evaluation
procalcitonin measurement
Measured: Day 14 after surgery
Systemic clinical evaluation
urine excretion rate measurement
Measured: Day of surgery
Systemic clinical evaluation
urine excretion rate measurement
Measured: Day 7 after surgery
Systemic clinical evaluation
urine excretion rate measurement
Measured: Day 14 after surgery
Histoarchitecture evaluation
Haematoxylin \& Eosin staining
Measured: Day of surgery
Histoarchitecture evaluation
Haematoxylin \& Eosin staining
Measured: Day 14 after surgery
Histoarchitecture evaluation
Movat's Pentachrome staining
Measured: Day of surgery
Histoarchitecture evaluation
Movat's Pentachrome staining
Measured: Day 14 after surgery
Immunohistochemistry
collagen-1 labelling
Measured: Day of surgery
Immunohistochemistry
collagen-1 labelling
Measured: Day 14 after surgery
Immunohistochemistry
collagen-3 labelling
Measured: Day of surgery
Immunohistochemistry
collagen-3 labelling
Measured: Day 14 after surgery
Immunohistochemistry
von Willebrand labelling
Measured: Day of surgery
Immunohistochemistry
von Willebrand labelling
Measured: Day 14 after surgery
Immunohistochemistry
alpha-Smooth Muscle Actin labelling
Measured: Day of surgery
Immunohistochemistry
alpha-Smooth Muscle Actin labelling
Measured: Day 14 after surgery
Wound healing relative gene expression
TGFB1
Measured: Day of surgery
Wound healing relative gene expression
TGFB1
Measured: Day 14 after surgery
Wound healing relative gene expression
TGFB3
Measured: Day of surgery
Wound healing relative gene expression
TGFB3
Measured: Day 14 after surgery
Wound healing relative gene expression
Wnt4
Measured: Day of surgery
Wound healing relative gene expression
Wnt4
Measured: Day 14 after surgery
Wound healing relative gene expression
CTNNB1
Measured: Day of surgery
Wound healing relative gene expression
CTNNB1
Measured: Day 14 after surgery
Wound healing relative gene expression
MMP2
Measured: Day of surgery
Wound healing relative gene expression
MMP2
Measured: Day 14 after surgery
Wound healing relative gene expression
MMP9
Measured: Day of surgery
Wound healing relative gene expression
MMP9
Measured: Day 14 after surgery
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted15 Dec 2022
- Study start6 Sep 2022
- Primary completion31 Dec 2023 (estimated)
- Study completion31 Dec 2024 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Burn Degree SecondStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Universitas IndonesiaThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Early Phase 1
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 20 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Universitas Indonesia
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, dr. Aditya Wardhana, Universitas Indonesia
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05652816
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- KET-866/ETIK/2021
- Status last verified
- Dec 2022
- First submitted
- 29 Nov 2022
- Last updated
- 15 Dec 2022
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 15 Dec 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Substitute Graft for Burns Using Biological Graft Seeded With Autologous Keratinocyte Co-cultured With Stem Cells
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05652816
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- KET-866/ETIK/2021
- Conditions
- Burn Degree Second, Burn Degree Third
- Keywords
- artificial skin graft, keratinocyte, amnion epithelial stem cells, burn
- Phase
- Early Phase 1
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 20 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Universitas IndonesiaUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 6 Sep 2022 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Dec 2023 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 31 Dec 2024 (estimated)
- First posted
- 15 Dec 2022 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The goal of this clinical trial is to test whether artificial skin graft can substitute autologous skin graft in current burn treatment. The main question it aims to answer is:
- Can artificial skin graft result in better wound healing compared to the current burn treatment; autologous skin graft?
You will:
- Undergo debridement surgery
- Receive artificial skin graft as an alternative to autologous skin graft
- Undergo biopsy procedure of burn area
If there is a comparison group: Researchers will compare autologous skin graft group to see the wound healing process
Detailed description
Burn caused by working accidents occurs mostly in the male population of productive age (68.68%). Up to this date, the only treatment for grade 2B-3 burns patients in Indonesia is skin transplantation taken from their own body (autologous skin graft). This treatment has several drawbacks in which repeated surgery is sometimes necessary, the source of skin in patients with wide area of burn is limited, and patients that are in the elder age and have comorbidities have high mortality risk.
In order to find an alternative for autologous skin graft therapy, a combination of tissue engineering and stem cell therapy is used to invent an artificial skin graft. The present study attempts to evaluate the efficacy of artificial skin graft seeded with autologous keratinocyte and stem cells towards wound healing in burn patients. The artificial graft used in this study is amnion bilayer; a graft that was decellularized to remove donor's cells and then layered to form into 3-D.
To evaluate the efficacy, biopsies are taken from the burn area of patients to evaluate the histoarchitecture of patients' tissue by histological staining (H\&E and Movat's pentachrome, IHC collagen I, collagen III, vWF, and alpha-SMA) and measure the relative gene expression by qPCR. For clinical data, burn area calculation using Rule of 9 method and thermography measurement using FLIRONE. Furthermore, systemic evaluation of patients are done by monitoring the procalcitonin, lactate, mean arterial pressure, gradation of wound, and sensory of burn area. The evaluation and measurement mentioned above are then compared to patients treated with the current available therapy; autologous skin graft. The artificial skin graft is hoped to result in equal, if not better, wound healing in burn patients compared to autologous skin graft. The investigators hope that artificial skin graft can be an option, other than autologous skin graft, in treating burn patients in the future.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| STSG (Split-Thickness Skin Graft) | Sham comparator | Procedure: Split-thickness skin graftPatients treated with the standard treatment; autologous skin graft |
| Amnion Bilayer Only | Experimental | Biological: Artificial skin graftPatients treated with artificial graft only |
| Amnion Bilayer seeded with co-culture | Experimental | Biological: Artificial skin graft co-culturePatients treated with artificial graft seeded with autologous keratinocyte co-cultured with amnion epithelial stem cells |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 55 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Aged 18 - 55
- Area of burn <50%
- Acute phase burn (<120 hrs)
- Have not undergo any surgery for burn treatment
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Immunocompromised
- Have comorbidities
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Split-thickness skin graftTransplantation of autologous skin to burn area | Procedure or surgery | STSG (Split-Thickness Skin Graft) |
| Artificial skin graftDecellularized amnion membrane formed into 3-D matrix | Biological | Amnion Bilayer Only |
| Artificial skin graft co-cultureDecellularized amnion membrane formed into 3-D matrix seeded with autologous keratinocyte co-cultured with amnion epithelial stem cells | Biological | Amnion Bilayer seeded with co-culture |
Primary outcome
Burn thickness
Time frame: Day of surgery
Thickness of burn evaluation using Rule of 9
Burn thickness
Time frame: Day 7 after surgery
Thickness of burn evaluation using Rule of 9
Burn thickness
Time frame: Day 14 after surgery
Thickness of burn evaluation using Rule of 9
Burn thermography
Time frame: Day of surgery
Thermography evaluation using FLIRONE
Burn thermography
Time frame: Day 7 after surgery
Thermography evaluation using FLIRONE
Burn thermography
Time frame: Day 14 after surgery
Thermography evaluation using FLIRONE
Systemic clinical evaluation
Time frame: Day of surgery
Mean arterial pressure measurement
Systemic clinical evaluation
Time frame: Day 7 after surgery
Mean arterial pressure measurement
Systemic clinical evaluation
Time frame: Day 14 after surgery
Mean arterial pressure measurement
Systemic clinical evaluation
Time frame: Day of surgery
lactate measurement
Systemic clinical evaluation
Time frame: Day 7 after surgery
lactate measurement
Systemic clinical evaluation
Time frame: Day 14 after surgery
lactate measurement
Systemic clinical evaluation
Time frame: Day of surgery
procalcitonin measurement
Systemic clinical evaluation
Time frame: Day 7 after surgery
procalcitonin measurement
Systemic clinical evaluation
Time frame: Day 14 after surgery
procalcitonin measurement
Systemic clinical evaluation
Time frame: Day of surgery
urine excretion rate measurement
Systemic clinical evaluation
Time frame: Day 7 after surgery
urine excretion rate measurement
Systemic clinical evaluation
Time frame: Day 14 after surgery
urine excretion rate measurement
Histoarchitecture evaluation
Time frame: Day of surgery
Haematoxylin \& Eosin staining
Histoarchitecture evaluation
Time frame: Day 14 after surgery
Haematoxylin \& Eosin staining
Histoarchitecture evaluation
Time frame: Day of surgery
Movat's Pentachrome staining
Histoarchitecture evaluation
Time frame: Day 14 after surgery
Movat's Pentachrome staining
Immunohistochemistry
Time frame: Day of surgery
collagen-1 labelling
Immunohistochemistry
Time frame: Day 14 after surgery
collagen-1 labelling
Immunohistochemistry
Time frame: Day of surgery
collagen-3 labelling
Immunohistochemistry
Time frame: Day 14 after surgery
collagen-3 labelling
Immunohistochemistry
Time frame: Day of surgery
von Willebrand labelling
Immunohistochemistry
Time frame: Day 14 after surgery
von Willebrand labelling
Immunohistochemistry
Time frame: Day of surgery
alpha-Smooth Muscle Actin labelling
Immunohistochemistry
Time frame: Day 14 after surgery
alpha-Smooth Muscle Actin labelling
Wound healing relative gene expression
Time frame: Day of surgery
TGFB1
Wound healing relative gene expression
Time frame: Day 14 after surgery
TGFB1
Wound healing relative gene expression
Time frame: Day of surgery
TGFB3
Wound healing relative gene expression
Time frame: Day 14 after surgery
TGFB3
Wound healing relative gene expression
Time frame: Day of surgery
Wnt4
Wound healing relative gene expression
Time frame: Day 14 after surgery
Wnt4
Wound healing relative gene expression
Time frame: Day of surgery
CTNNB1
Wound healing relative gene expression
Time frame: Day 14 after surgery
CTNNB1
Wound healing relative gene expression
Time frame: Day of surgery
MMP2
Wound healing relative gene expression
Time frame: Day 14 after surgery
MMP2
Wound healing relative gene expression
Time frame: Day of surgery
MMP9
Wound healing relative gene expression
Time frame: Day 14 after surgery
MMP9
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 15 Dec 2022.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Burn Degree Second
Not yet recruiting
Impact of Range of Motion Exercises on Pain and Functional Ability
Impact of ROM Exercises on Pain and Functional Ability in Patients With Second -Degree Burns
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Phoenixin and Pain in Pediatric Burn Patients
Children, Acute Pain
Not yet recruitingObservational study
The Use of Cultured (Dermal) Epithelial Autografts in Severely Burned Patients
Burn Degree Second, Burn Degree Third
Not yet recruiting
Development and Clinical Study of Burn Wound Nursing Dressing Based on Sodium Hyaluronate Carbomer Composite Hydrogel
Burn, Burn Contracture of Skin
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Cell Suspension With Biologic Dressing for Burn Wounds
Wound Healing
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Early Phase 1 study testing Split-thickness skin graft, Artificial skin graft and Artificial skin graft co-culture in people with Burn Degree Second and Burn Degree Third, run by Universitas Indonesia at 1 site in Indonesia.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Dec 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Indonesia. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Early Phase 1 (sometimes called Phase 0) studies give a very small amount of a treatment to a few people, mainly to see how the body handles it.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Each site lists its own contact: choose the nearest one under Trial locations. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Burn thickness (time frame: Day of surgery). The study lists 42 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Dec 2022.