Hidradenitis SuppurativaPhase 2NCT05635838
Study to Evaluate of the Efficacy and Safety of Ruxolitinib Cream in Participants With Hidradenitis Suppurativa
A Phase 2 study testing Ruxolitinib cream in people with Hidradenitis Suppurativa, run by Incyte Corporation at 20 sites in 2 countries.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Ruxolitinib cream in participants with Hidradenitis Suppurativa. This is a randomized 16-week double-blind, vehicle-controlled (DBVC) study followed by a 16 week open label extension period (OLE) with an active treatment for participants who complete… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Hidradenitis Suppurativa
- What is being tested?
- Ruxolitinib cream
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 69 participants
- Where
- 20 sitesin 2 countries
- Study dates
- 7 Dec 2022to 14 Mar 2024
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Diagnosis of HS based on clinical history and physical examination for at least 3 months.
- Diagnosis of HS (Hurley I or II) with the following:
- A total AN count of 3 to ≤ 10, with no draining tunnels at screening and baseline visits. AND
- The AN count at the screening AND baseline visits:
- AN of 3 should affect at least 1 distinct anatomical area
- AN of > 3 to ≤ 10 should affect at least 2 distinct anatomical areas.
Show all 10Show fewer
- Baseline Skin Pain or Itch NRS score ≥ 1.
- Agreement to NOT use topical and systemic antibiotics for treatment of HS during the study.
- Agreement to NOT use a diluted beach bath or topical antiseptic washes containing chlorhexidine gluconate or benzoyl peroxide on the areas affected by HS lesions during the study.
- Willingness to avoid pregnancy or fathering children
Who cannot join
- Presence of draining tunnels at screening or at baseline visits.
- Concurrent conditions and history of other diseases:
- Active ongoing inflammatory diseases of the skin other than HS that might confound the evaluation of HS.
- Any other concomitant skin disorder (eg, generalized erythroderma such as Netherton's syndrome), pigmentation, or extensive scarring that in the opinion of the investigator may interfere with the evaluation of HS AN or compromise participant safety.
- Immunocompromised (eg, lymphoma, acquired immunodeficiency syndrome, or Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome).
- Chronic or acute infection requiring treatment with systemic antibiotics, antivirals, antiparasitics, antiprotozoals, or antifungals within 2 weeks before baseline.
Show all 11Show fewer
- Active acute bacterial, fungal, or viral skin infection (eg, herpes simplex, herpes zoster, chicken pox, clinically infected AD, or impetigo) within 2 weeks before baseline.
- Laboratory values outside of the protocol-defined criteria.
- Use of any prohibited medications per protocol-defined criteria.
- Pregnant or lactating participants, or those considering pregnancy during the period of their study participation.
- Other exclusion criteria may apply.
Trial locations and contacts
20 sites in 2 countries.
20 sites in 2 countries
United States15 sites
Delricht Research
Baton Rouge, Louisiana, 70809
Skin Care Research, Llc Scr Hollywood
Boca Raton, Florida, 33486
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Boston, Massachusetts, 02215
First Oc Dermatology
Fountain Valley, California, 92708
Marietta Dermatology the Skin Cancer Center Marietta
Marietta, Georgia, 30060-1047
International Clinical Research Tennessee Llc
Murfreesboro, Tennessee, 37130
Delricht Research
New Orleans, Louisiana, 70115
Dr Bobby Buka, Md Greenwich Village
New York, New York, 10012-1354
Austin Institute For Clinical Research Aicr Pflugerville
Pflugerville, Texas, 78660
Medical Dermatology Specialists Phoenix
Phoenix, Arizona, 85006
Dermatology Associates of Plymouth Meeting
Plymouth Meeting, Pennsylvania, 19462
Progressive Clinical Research
San Antonio, Texas, 78213
Dermatology Specialists of Spokane
Spokane, Washington, 99202
Forcare Clinical Research
Tampa, Florida, 33613
Revival Research Institute, Llc Troy
Troy, Michigan, 48084
Canada5 sites
Dr.Wei Jing Loo Medicine Professional Corp
London, Ontario, N6H 5L4
Lynderm Research Inc
Markham, Ontario, L3P 1X2
Skin Centre For Dermatology
Peterborough, Ontario, K9J 5K2
Xlr8 Medical Research
Windsor, Ontario, N8W 1E6
Wiseman Dermatology Research Inc
Winnipeg, Manitoba, R3M 3Z4
About this study
Official title: A Phase 2, Double-Blind, Randomized, Vehicle-Controlled, Efficacy, and Safety Study of Ruxolitinib Cream in Participants With Hidradenitis Suppurativa
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Ruxolitinib cream in participants with Hidradenitis Suppurativa. This is a randomized 16-week double-blind, vehicle-controlled (DBVC) study followed by a 16 week open label extension period (OLE) with an active treatment for participants who complete the DBVC period.
- Conditions
- Hidradenitis Suppurativa
- Being tested
- Ruxolitinib cream, Vehicle cream
- Keywords
- Hidradenitis suppurativa, skin disease, ruxolitinb cream
- Medical subject headings
- Hidradenitis Suppurativa, Skin Diseases
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Ruxolitinib creamDrug
Also called INCB018424 cream
Ruxolitinib cream is a topical formulation applied as a thin film to affected areas.
Vehicle creamDrug
Vehicle cream is matching in appearance to ruxolitinib cream and is to be applied in the same manner as ruxolitinib cream.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Ruxolitinib Cream | Experimental | Ruxolitinib 1.5% cream BID for 16 weeks of double-blind, vehicle-controlled (DBVC) period followed by ruxolitinb 1.5% cream BID for 16 weeks in an open-label extension. Receives: Drug: Ruxolitinib cream |
| Vehicle Cream | Experimental | Vehicle cream BID for 16 weeks of double-blind, vehicle-controlled (DBVC) period followed by ruxolitinb 1.5% cream BID for 16 weeks in an open-label extension. Receives: Drug: Vehicle cream |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change From Baseline in Abscess and Inflammatory Nodule (AN) Count at Week 16
The mixed model repeated measure (MMRM) included the fixed effects of the treatment group (ruxolitinib 1.5% and vehicle cream), stratification factor (Baseline AN count of ≥3 to 4 or ≥5 to 10), visit, and visit-by-treatment interaction. Change from Baseline was calculated as the Week 16 value minus the Baseline value.
Measured: Baseline; Week 16
Secondary outcomes (10)
Percentage of Participants Achieving AN50, AN75, AN90, and AN100 at Week 16
AN50, AN75, AN90, and AN100 were defined as at least a 50%, 75%, 90%, and 100% decrease, respectively, in AN count relative to Baseline.
Measured: Baseline; Week 16
Change From Baseline to Week 16 in Total AN Count in Anatomical Areas With Pre-existing ANs at Baseline
Pre-existing ANs at Baseline were defined as abscesses and/or inflammatory nodules present at Baseline. All new ANs identified during the study in an anatomical area that had pre-existing ANs at Baseline were counted. Any new ANs identified in an anatomical area that was initially free of ANs at Baseline were not counted. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. The MMRM included the fixed effects of the treatment group (ruxolitinib 1.5% and vehicle cream), stratification factor (Baseline AN count of ≥3 to 4 or ≥5 to 10), visit, and visit-by-treatment interaction. Change from Baseline was calculated as the Week 16 value minus the Baseline value.
Measured: Baseline; Week 16
Change From Baseline in Skin Pain Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Score at Week 16
The Skin Pain NRS is a daily participant-reported measure (24-hour recall) of the worst level of skin pain related to Hidradenitis Suppurativa. The participants rated the pain severity of their Hidradenitis Suppurativa by selecting a number from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst imaginable pain) that best described their worst level of pain in the past 24 hours. The MMRM included the fixed effects of the treatment group (ruxolitinib 1.5% and vehicle cream), stratification factor (Baseline AN count of ≥3 to 4 or ≥5 to 10), visit, and visit-by-treatment interaction. Change from Baseline was calculated as the Week 16 value minus the Baseline value.
Measured: Baseline; Week 16
Change From Baseline in Itch NRS Score at Week 16
The Itch NRS is a daily participant-reported measure (24-hour recall) of the worst level of itch intensity related to Hidradenitis Suppurativa. The participants rated the itch severity of their Hidradenitis Suppurativa by selecting a number from 0 (no itch) to 10 (worst imaginable itch) that best described their worst level of itching in the past 24 hours. The MMRM included the fixed effects of the treatment group (ruxolitinib 1.5% and vehicle cream), stratification factor (Baseline AN count of ≥3 to 4 or ≥5 to 10), visit, and visit-by-treatment interaction. Change from Baseline was calculated as the Week 16 value minus the Baseline value.
Measured: Baseline; Week 16
Percentage of Participants Who Achieve Hidradenitis Suppurativa Clinical Response (HiSCR) at Week 16
HiSCR was defined as at least a 50% reduction in AN count with no increase in either abscess or draining fistula counts, relative to Baseline.
Measured: Baseline; Week 16
Change From Baseline in the International Hidradenitis Suppurativa Severity Score System (IHS4) Score at Week 16
The IHS4 is a composite, dynamic score and validated tool used to determine Hidradenitis Suppurativa severity. IHS4 score was calculated by the number of inflammatory nodules (multiplied by 1) plus the number of abscesses (multiplied by 2) plus the number of draining tunnels (multiplied by 4). Scores: mild=0-3; moderate=4-10; severe ≥11. The MMRM included the fixed effects of the treatment group (ruxolitinib 1.5% and vehicle cream), stratification factor (Baseline AN count of ≥3 to 4 or ≥5 to 10), visit, and visit-by-treatment interaction. Change from Baseline was calculated as the Week 16 value minus the Baseline value.
Measured: Baseline; Week 16
Number of Participants With Any Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE ) in the Double-blind, Vehicle-controlled (DBVC) Period
An adverse event (AE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence associated with the use of a drug in humans, whether or not it is considered drug related. An AE could therefore have been any unfavorable or unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of study drug. A TEAE was defined as any AE reported for the first time or the worsening of a pre-existing event after the first application of study drug.
Measured: up to Week 16 plus 30 days
Number of Participants With Any Grade 3 or Higher TEAE in the DBVC Period
An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence associated with the use of a drug in humans, whether or not it is considered drug related. A TEAE was defined as any AE reported for the first time or the worsening of a pre-existing event after the first application of study drug. The severity of AEs was assessed using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v5.0 Grades 1 through 5. Grade 1: mild; asymptomatic or mild symptoms; clinical or diagnostic observations only; treatment not indicated. Grade 2: moderate; minimal, local, or noninvasive treatment indicated; limiting age-appropriate activities of daily living. Grade 3: severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening; hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization indicated; disabling; limiting self-care activities of daily living. Grade 4: life-threatening consequences; urgent treatment indicated. Grade 5: fatal.
Measured: up to Week 16 plus 30 days
Number of Participants With Any TEAE in the Open-label Extension (OLE) Period
An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence associated with the use of a drug in humans, whether or not it is considered drug related. An AE could therefore have been any unfavorable or unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of study drug. A TEAE was defined as any AE reported for the first time or the worsening of a pre-existing event after the first application of study drug.
Measured: from Week 17 up to Week 32 plus 30 days
Number of Participants With Any Grade 3 or Higher TEAE in the OLE Period
An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence associated with the use of a drug in humans, whether or not it is considered drug related. A TEAE was defined as any AE reported for the first time or the worsening of a pre-existing event after the first application of study drug. The severity of AEs was assessed using CTCAE v5.0 Grades 1 through 5. Grade 1: mild; asymptomatic or mild symptoms; clinical or diagnostic observations only; treatment not indicated. Grade 2: moderate; minimal, local, or noninvasive treatment indicated; limiting age-appropriate activities of daily living. Grade 3: severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening; hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization indicated; disabling; limiting self-care activities of daily living. Grade 4: life-threatening consequences; urgent treatment indicated. Grade 5: fatal.
Measured: from Week 17 up to Week 32 plus 30 days
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted2 Dec 2022
- Study start7 Dec 2022
- Primary completion19 Oct 2023
- Study completion14 Mar 2024
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Hidradenitis SuppurativaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Incyte CorporationThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Participants will be randomized 1:1 to 1 of 2 treatment groups (ruxolitinib 1.5% cream BID or vehicle cream BID).
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 69 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Incyte Corporation
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05635838
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- INCB 18424-221
- Status last verified
- Oct 2024
- First submitted
- 23 Nov 2022
- Last updated
- 1 Nov 2024
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: Incyte shares data with qualified external researchers after a research proposal is submitted. These requests are reviewed and approved by a review panel on the basis of scientific merit. All data provided is anonymized to respect the privacy of patients who have participated in the trial in line with applicable laws and regulations. The trial data availability is according to the criteria and process described on https://www.incyte.com/our-company/compliance-and-transparency
- Expanded access
- Available
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 1 Nov 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Phase 2, Double-Blind, Randomized, Vehicle-Controlled, Efficacy, and Safety Study of Ruxolitinib Cream in Participants With Hidradenitis Suppurativa
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05635838
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- INCB 18424-221
- Conditions
- Hidradenitis Suppurativa
- Keywords
- Hidradenitis suppurativa, skin disease, ruxolitinb cream
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 69 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Incyte CorporationIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 7 Dec 2022 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 19 Oct 2023 (actual)
- Study completion
- 14 Mar 2024 (actual)
- First posted
- 2 Dec 2022 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 1 Nov 2024
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Ruxolitinib cream in participants with Hidradenitis Suppurativa. This is a randomized 16-week double-blind, vehicle-controlled (DBVC) study followed by a 16 week open label extension period (OLE) with an active treatment for participants who complete the DBVC period.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Participants will be randomized 1:1 to 1 of 2 treatment groups (ruxolitinib 1.5% cream BID or vehicle cream BID).
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Ruxolitinib Cream | Experimental | Drug: Ruxolitinib creamRuxolitinib 1.5% cream BID for 16 weeks of double-blind, vehicle-controlled (DBVC) period followed by ruxolitinb 1.5% cream BID for 16 weeks in an open-label extension. |
| Vehicle Cream | Experimental | Drug: Vehicle creamVehicle cream BID for 16 weeks of double-blind, vehicle-controlled (DBVC) period followed by ruxolitinb 1.5% cream BID for 16 weeks in an open-label extension. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (10 listed)
- Diagnosis of HS based on clinical history and physical examination for at least 3 months.
- Diagnosis of HS (Hurley I or II) with the following:
- AN of 3 should affect at least 1 distinct anatomical area
- AN of > 3 to ≤ 10 should affect at least 2 distinct anatomical areas.
- Baseline Skin Pain or Itch NRS score ≥ 1.
Key exclusion criteria (11 listed)
- Presence of draining tunnels at screening or at baseline visits.
- Concurrent conditions and history of other diseases:
- Laboratory values outside of the protocol-defined criteria.
- Use of any prohibited medications per protocol-defined criteria.
- Pregnant or lactating participants, or those considering pregnancy during the period of their study participation.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Ruxolitinib creamAlso: INCB018424 creamRuxolitinib cream is a topical formulation applied as a thin film to affected areas. | Drug | Ruxolitinib Cream |
| Vehicle creamVehicle cream is matching in appearance to ruxolitinib cream and is to be applied in the same manner as ruxolitinib cream. | Drug | Vehicle Cream |
Primary outcome
Change From Baseline in Abscess and Inflammatory Nodule (AN) Count at Week 16
Time frame: Baseline; Week 16
The mixed model repeated measure (MMRM) included the fixed effects of the treatment group (ruxolitinib 1.5% and vehicle cream), stratification factor (Baseline AN count of ≥3 to 4 or ≥5 to 10), visit, and visit-by-treatment interaction. Change from Baseline was calculated as the Week 16 value minus the Baseline value.
10 secondary outcomes
Percentage of Participants Achieving AN50, AN75, AN90, and AN100 at Week 16
Time frame: Baseline; Week 16
Change From Baseline to Week 16 in Total AN Count in Anatomical Areas With Pre-existing ANs at Baseline
Time frame: Baseline; Week 16
Change From Baseline in Skin Pain Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Score at Week 16
Time frame: Baseline; Week 16
Change From Baseline in Itch NRS Score at Week 16
Time frame: Baseline; Week 16
Percentage of Participants Who Achieve Hidradenitis Suppurativa Clinical Response (HiSCR) at Week 16
Time frame: Baseline; Week 16
Change From Baseline in the International Hidradenitis Suppurativa Severity Score System (IHS4) Score at Week 16
Time frame: Baseline; Week 16
Number of Participants With Any Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE ) in the Double-blind, Vehicle-controlled (DBVC) Period
Time frame: up to Week 16 plus 30 days
Number of Participants With Any Grade 3 or Higher TEAE in the DBVC Period
Time frame: up to Week 16 plus 30 days
Number of Participants With Any TEAE in the Open-label Extension (OLE) Period
Time frame: from Week 17 up to Week 32 plus 30 days
Number of Participants With Any Grade 3 or Higher TEAE in the OLE Period
Time frame: from Week 17 up to Week 32 plus 30 days
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 1 Nov 2024.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. Incyte shares data with qualified external researchers after a research proposal is submitted. These requests are reviewed and approved by a review panel on the basis of scientific merit. All data provided is anonymized to respect the privacy of patients who have participated in the trial in line with applicable laws and regulations. The trial data availability is according to the criteria and process described on https://www.incyte.com/our-company/compliance-and-transparency
Related trials for Hidradenitis Suppurativa
Not yet recruiting
Early Pathophysiology of Hidradenitis Suppurativa and Prediction of the Risk of Progression: a Prospective Cohort
Hidradenitis Suppurativa (HS)
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
A Study of Zasocitinib in Adults With Hidradenitis Suppurativa
Hidradenitis Suppurativa
Active, not recruiting
Acceptability of MBSR for People With HS
Hidradenitis Suppurativa (HS)
RecruitingPhase 3
Rollover Study for Participants Previously Enrolled in Clinical Trials of Povorcitinib
Hidradenitis Suppurativa (HS)
RecruitingPhase 2
ORKA-002 Versus Placebo in Participants With Moderate-to-Severe Hidradenitis Suppurativa
Hidradenitis Suppurativa (HS)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
20 sites in 2 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Ruxolitinib cream in people with Hidradenitis Suppurativa, run by Incyte Corporation at 20 sites in 2 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 10 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Nov 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 20 sites in United States, Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 1 Nov 2024). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change From Baseline in Abscess and Inflammatory Nodule (AN) Count at Week 16 (time frame: Baseline; Week 16). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Nov 2024.