AzTrials
AzTrials

Acute PainNCT05589246

Regional Analgesia in Combination With Cryoanalgesia to Prevent Acute Pain Following Nuss Procedure

A study testing regional analgesia with cryolesia in people with Acute Pain and Regional Anesthesia, run by Pomeranian Medical University Szczecin at 2 sites in Poland.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Funnel chest deformation is a painful procedure, which requires high doses and long time used of opioids. It makes difficult introduction of ERAS protocol. Intraoperative cryolesia of intercostal nerves serves great relief of pain after this procedures. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 10 to 18 years
Conditions the study is for
Acute Pain, Regional Anesthesia
What is being tested?
regional analgesia with cryolesia
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
40 participants
Where
2 sitesPoland
Study dates
28 Sep 2022to 1 Dec 2022
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 10 to 18 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients undergoing pectus excavatum repair with modyfied minimal invasive thoracoscopic NUSS technique
  • aged 10 years or above 10 up to 18
  • informed consent signed for cryoanalgesia informed consent signed for regional analgesia

Who cannot join

  • Age of 9 years or below
  • Refuse to receive cryoanalgesia or regional analgesia as primary pain relief
  • Any contraindication to cryoanalgesia
  • Difficult follow-up for geographical reasons and/or impossibility by the patient to understand how to perform self-measurements

Trial locations and contacts

2 sites in 1 country.

Jowita Biernawska, MD PhD contact

+48501337073

lisienko@wp.pl

Sławomir Zacha, MD PhD contact

513100813

sekozacha@gmail.com

Poland2 sites, 2 recruiting
  • Pomeranian Medical University

    Szczecin, 70-204

    Jowita Biernawska, MD PhD, +48501337073, lisienko@wp.pl

    Recruiting
  • Pomeranian Medical University

    Szczecin, 71-252

    Sławomir Zacha, MD PhD, +48513100813, sekozacha@gmail.com

    Jowita Biernawska, MD PhD, +48501337073, lisienko@wp.pl

    Recruiting

Other trials in Poland

About this study

Official title: Regional Analgesia in Combination With Intraoperative Cryoanalgesia Are the Essential Parts of Enhanced Recovery Protocol in the Minimally Invasive Modyfied Nuss Procedure of Children With Funnel Chest Deformation

Funnel chest deformation is a painful procedure, which requires high doses and long time used of opioids. It makes difficult introduction of ERAS protocol. Intraoperative cryolesia of intercostal nerves serves great relief of pain after this procedures. However ablation of the nerves needs 12-24 hours to achieve effects. During this time the high doses of opioids are needed. It causes side effects (sedation makes rehabilitation difficult). On the other hand, percutaneus cryoablation performed 12-24 hours before Nuss procedure needs repeated general anaesthesia. The investigators hypothesed that regional analgesia (erector spine plain block) performed just before intraopertive cryolesia may cover time to full cryolesia effect.

Read the detailed description

Severe pain in the post-Nuss procedure needs the use of many analgesic drugs, including opioids. It may cause adverse side effects and difficulties with rehabilitation. Moreover, it increases the risk of complications and prolonged hospitalisation. Cryoanalgesia as a part of multimodal analgesia offers better analgesia than single regional techiques with drugs and fasilitate introduction of the enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol. However ablation of the nerves needs 12-24 hours to achieve effects. Regional analgesia (erector spine plain block) performed just before intraopertive cryolesia may cover time to full cryolesia effect.

This Before - After Study is a single institution pilot study designed to compare intraoperative cryolesia alone (control group) with the intervention group (cryolesia and bilateral erector spine plane block). It is designed for better management of acute pain in the pediatric population diagnosed with funnel-chest and treated using the modyfied Nuss method. Control group received standard care with cryolesia using the Cryo-S Painless device (Metrum - Cryoflex Polska Limited) and multimodal analgesia according the current guidelines. The intervention group received all of the above and regional analgesia (erector spine plain block, ESP block).

The aims of the study were the assessment the effectiveness of ESP block before full action of intraoperative cryoanalgesia as a method of acute pain control, safety of the method.

The results were compared in terms of demographics, pain levels, side effects of the pain relief medications in the postoperative period and lenght of hospitalization.

Being tested
regional analgesia with cryolesia
Keywords
nuss procedure
Medical subject headings
Acute Pain

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • regional analgesia with cryolesiaDevice

    The regional analgesia (erector spine plane block) will be added to intraoperative cryolesia of intercostal nerves

Study groups in NCT05589246
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
controlNo interventionintraoperative cryoanalgesia of intercostal nerves with multimodal analgesia
interventionExperimentalregional analgesia (ESP block) with intraoperative cryoanalgesia of intercostal nerves and multimodal analgesia
Receives: Device: regional analgesia with cryolesia

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. The worse pain

    Maximal pain within first 24 hours after operation, Numeric pain score. Range from 0 to 10.

    Measured: within first 24 hours after operation

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. LAST (Local anesthetic systemic toxicity)

    No score exists. Assesment of clinical features: sensory and visual changes, muscular activation, seizure activity, new rhythm disturbances.

    Measured: within first 24 hours after operation

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted21 Oct 2022
  2. Study start28 Sep 2022
  3. Primary completion1 Nov 2022 (estimated)
  4. Study completion1 Dec 2022 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Sequential
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Participant
Enrolment
40 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05589246
Sponsor's protocol ID
PomeranianMU-KRIO
Status last verified
Oct 2022
First submitted
8 Oct 2022
Last updated
21 Oct 2022
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided: after contact with the principal investigator

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing regional analgesia with cryolesia in people with Acute Pain and Regional Anesthesia, run by Pomeranian Medical University Szczecin at 2 sites in Poland.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Oct 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 2 sites in Poland. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Jowita Biernawska, MD PhD (+48501337073, lisienko@wp.pl), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

The worse pain (time frame: within first 24 hours after operation). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Oct 2022.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in