Spinal Cord InjuriesNCT05553353
Dosing rTMS for Depression Post-SCI
A study testing repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation--Active in people with Spinal Cord Injuries and Depression, run by VA Office of Research and Development at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
Depression is a leading cause of disability worldwide and is more commonly seen in individual's post-spinal cord injury (SCI) than in the general population. Depression post-SCI impacts an individuals' quality of life and recovery. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 60 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Spinal Cord Injuries, Depression, Depressive Disorder, Major
- What is being tested?
- repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation--Active
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 24 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 31 Mar 2025to 29 Oct 2027
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 60 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- cervical or thoracic spinal cord injury at least 6 months prior with AIS A, B, C, or D;
- 18 - 60 years of age;
- major depressive disorder, as identified by Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-V;
- Hamilton Depression Rating Scale-17 score > 18;
- not taking antidepressant medications or no change in doses of psychotropic medication(s) for at least 4 weeks before the study (6 weeks if newly initiated medication)
Who cannot join
- concomitant neurologic diseases/disorders or dementia;
- cognitive impairment (Montreal Cognitive Assessment <17);
- history of psychosis or other Axis I disorder that is primary;
- positive screen for bipolar disorder through the Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview;
- history of claustrophobia;
- life expectancy <1 year;
Show all 12Show fewer
- electronic or metallic implants (i.e., metal in the head, cochlear implant, or pacemaker;
- history of seizures or currently prescribed anti-seizure medications;
- taking medication that increases the risk of seizures;
- pregnancy as identified through a positive urine pregnancy test;
- Hamilton Depression Rating Scale-17 question #3 regarding suicide: >2 or suicide attempt within the previous two years;
- inability to (University of California, San Diego Brief Assessment of Capacity to Consent) or declined to give informed consent.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
United States1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Ralph H. Johnson VA Medical Center, Charleston, SC
Charleston, South Carolina, 29401-5703
Catherine J VanDerwerker, PhD DPT PT, 843-792-5047, catherine.vanderwerker@va.gov
Sarah A Jackson, BA MA, (843) 789-6700, sarah.jackson@va.gov
About this study
Official title: Evaluating a Novel Method to Determine the rTMS Dose Needed for Treating Depression After Spinal Cord Injury
Depression is a leading cause of disability worldwide and is more commonly seen in individual's post-spinal cord injury (SCI) than in the general population. Depression post-SCI impacts an individuals' quality of life and recovery. It has been reported that among Veterans with an SCI, those without depression live longer than those with depression. Thus, depression must be treated appropriately. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is an FDA-approved treatment for depression, but dosing is based on a motor response or movement in the thumb. Over half of individuals with SCI have some degree of arm or hand impairment, so these individuals might not be eligible for rTMS, or they may receive the wrong dose. This study proposes clinical trial in individuals with depression post-SCI to assess the anti-depressant effect of a novel technique to dose rTMS that does not require a motor response in the thumb. By gaining a better understanding of the application of rTMS for depression post-SCI, the investigators aim to advance the rehabilitative care of Veterans.
Read the detailed description
Depression is a leading cause of disability worldwide and is one of the most prevalent neuropsychiatric manifestations following spinal cord injury (SCI). Based on an estimated 42,000 Veterans having an SCI1 and an estimated prevalence of depression among Veterans post-SCI of 19-28%, nearly 12,000 Veterans with SCI have comorbid depression at any time. The burden of depression post-SCI is significant, as it can impact quality of life and is associated with increased healthcare utilization and higher mortality. As noted by the updated Clinical Practice Guidelines from the Paralyzed Veterans of America, treating depression is essential, but further research is needed specifically within the SCI population to help formulate stronger evidence-based guidelines.
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), a type of non-invasive brain stimulation, is an FDA-approved treatment option for major depressive disorder (MDD) that is utilized throughout the Veterans Affairs (VA) health system. However, to date, no published studies have examined its effectiveness post-SCI. A critical challenge for widespread administration of rTMS for depression post-SCI is dosing, as the resting motor threshold (rMT), a motor response to transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), of the right abductor pollicis brevis (APB) is used to dose rTMS. Approximately 60% of the SCI population has incomplete or complete tetraplegia, indicating some degree of upper extremity (UE) impairment, making rMT not reliably attainable. Thus, it is plausible to conclude that over half the SCI population could be excluded from receiving rTMS treatment for depression or may receive an improper dose, impacting its safety and effectiveness. This represents a major gap in the field of SCI rehabilitation in that a large portion of individuals with SCI have concurrent MDD. As such, evidence-based treatment options are necessary to address the needs of this large clinical cohort, thereby improving the lives of these Veterans, their caregivers, and their families.
This study will examine the potential of rTMS, dosed by reverse-calculation electric-field modeling, to improve depressive symptoms in individuals with MDD post-SCI via a randomized, 2-arm, sham-controlled pilot clinical trial. Over four years, twenty-four individual post-SCI with MDD will be enrolled and randomized to receive 6 weeks (5 sessions/week) of either active or sham rTMS treatment. Using an unbalanced design, a quarter of the sample (n=6) randomized to the sham group and the remainder (n=18) randomized to receive active rTMS. Dosing parameters will follow the FDA-approved protocol of 3,000 pulses/session at 10Hz, and intensity will be determined by reverse-calculation electric-field modeling. The primary outcome measure for this study will be the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression-17. Participants will also complete a 12- and 24-week post-intervention follow-up assessments. It is hypothesized that rTMS treatment dosed using reverse-calculation electric-field modeling will result in a moderate between-group effect size favoring the anti-depressant benefits of rTMS treatment (vs. sham).
In addition to its established anti-depressive effects, rTMS has also been shown to improve patient-reported outcomes such as quality of life and depression-related disability. An extremely exciting possibility is that effective treatment of MDD results in a virtuous cycle whereby reducing depression concomitantly facilitates improvements in other psychosocial domains. The second aim seeks to explore this possibility by determining the extent to which improvements in depressive symptoms are associated with changes in quality of life and participation in Veterans post-SCI with MDD. This trial is an essential step toward optimizing SCI rehabilitation, while simultaneously providing a unique opportunity to study the effects of depression on psychosocial responses to rehabilitation.
The data generated could inform the development of additional interventions focused on neuromodulation to improve function and quality of life for individuals following SCI and other clinical cohorts with upper extremity motor impairment, (e.g., traumatic brain injury, multiple sclerosis, amputees) who otherwise may not be able to benefit from the anti-depressant effects of rTMS treatment.
- Conditions
- Spinal Cord Injuries, Depression, Depressive Disorder, Major
- Being tested
- repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation--Active, repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation--Sham
- Keywords
- Spinal Cord Injuries, Depression, Depressive Disorder, Major, Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
- Medical subject headings
- Spinal Cord Injuries, Depression, Depressive Disorder, Major
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation--ActiveDevice
Also called rTMS
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is a type of non-invasive brain stimulation. An active coil will be used to administer the active rTMS.
repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation--ShamDevice
Also called rTMS
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is a type of non-invasive brain stimulation. A sham coil will be used to administer the sham rTMS.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Active rTMS | Experimental | Active repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) that will be administered 5 days/week for 6 weeks. Intensity will be individualized based on reverse-calculation electric-field modeling. Receives: Device: repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation--Active |
| Sham rTMS | Sham comparator | Sham repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) that will be administered 5 days/week for 6 weeks. Intensity will be individualized based on reverse-calculation electric-field modeling, but a sham treatment coil will be used; thus, no active treatment will be administered. Receives: Device: repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation--Sham |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change from baseline in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale-17 (HAM-D17) score immediately post-intervention
The Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D17) is the most widely used tool to assess the severity of depressive symptoms, once diagnosed, and will be used in this study. The HAM-D17 is a semi-structured interview style questionnaire that asks about one's experience with seventeen different depressive symptoms over the past week. Total HAM-D17 scores range from no depressive symptoms (HAM-D17 = 0-7); mild (HAM-D17 = 8-16), moderate (HAM-D17 = 17-23) or severe depressive symptoms (HAMD-D17 = 24).
Measured: Baseline; Following Week 2 of 6-week intervention Following Week 4 of 6-week intervention; Immediately post-intervention; 12-weeks post-intervention; 24-weeks post-intervention
Secondary outcomes (6)
Change from baseline in Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire-Short Form (Q-LES-Q-SF) at timepoints noted below
The Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire-Short Form (Q-LES-Q-SF) is a 16-item questionnaire that asks about the degree of enjoyment and satisfaction in various are of daily functioning, like physical health/activity, mood, work, household duties, school/coursework, leisure time activity, and social relationships. Answers are scored from 1 (very poor) to 5 (very good). It is a valid and reliable measure often used in psychiatric research but has been used in SCI research for neuropathic pain.
Measured: Baseline; Following Week 2 of 6-week intervention Following Week 4 of 6-week intervention; Immediately post-intervention; 12-weeks post-intervention; 24-weeks post-intervention
Change from baseline in Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) Score at timepoints noted below
Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS): The SDS is a three-item questionnaire that asks how depressive symptoms have impacted work/school, social, and family. It is based on a 10-point scale, where 0 = no disruption to 10 = extreme disruption. This outcome use used in the only randomized control trial for an antidepressant post-SCI.
Measured: Baseline; Following Week 2 of 6-week intervention Following Week 4 of 6-week intervention; Immediately post-intervention; 12-weeks post-intervention; 24-weeks post-intervention
Change from baseline in Leisure Time Physical Activity Questionnaire for People with Spinal Cord Injury (LTPAQ-SCI) Score at timepoints noted below
Leisure Time Physical Activity Questionnaire for People with Spinal Cord Injury (LTPAQ-SCI) is used to assess physical activity levels of individuals with a spinal cord injury. This is a 3-item questionnaire that asks one to report the number of days and minutes of mild, moderate, and heavy-intensity leisure-time physical activity performed over the previous seven days. This is a valid and reliable measure in the SCI population.
Measured: Baseline; Following Week 2 of 6-week intervention Following Week 4 of 6-week intervention; Immediately post-intervention; 12-weeks post-intervention; 24-weeks post-intervention
Change from baseline in Craig Handicap Assessment and Reporting Tool - Short Form (CHART-SF) Score at timepoints noted below
Craig Handicap Assessment and Reporting Tool - Short Form (CHART-SF) assesses how an individual with a disability fulfills roles in six domains, physical independence, cognitive independence, mobility, occupation, social integration, and economic self-sufficiency. It is a valid and reliable measure post-spinal cord injury. The total score ranges from 0 - 600, with a higher score indicating greater independent functioning and higher social and community participation.
Measured: Baseline; Following Week 2 of 6-week intervention Following Week 4 of 6-week intervention; Immediately post-intervention; 12-weeks post-intervention; 24-weeks post-intervention
Change from baseline in Reintegration to Normal Living Index (RNL) Score at timepoints noted below
The Reintegration to Normal Living Index (RNL) is an 11-item questionnaire that assesses one's satisfaction with their performance of mobility, self-care, daily activity, recreational activity, and family roles. The total adjusted score ranging from 0 - 100, with 100 indicating full or complete reintegration.
Measured: Baseline; Following Week 2 of 6-week intervention Following Week 4 of 6-week intervention; Immediately post-intervention; 12-weeks post-intervention; 24-weeks post-intervention
Change from baseline Hamilton Depression Rating Scale-17 (HAM-D17) Score at timepoints noted below
The Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D17) is the most widely used tool to assess the severity of depressive symptoms, once diagnosed, and will be used in this study. The HAM-D17 is a semi-structured interview style questionnaire that asks about one's experience with seventeen different depressive symptoms over the past week. Total HAM-D17 scores range from no depressive symptoms (HAM-D17 = 0-7); mild (HAM-D17 = 8-16), moderate (HAM-D17 = 17-23) or severe depressive symptoms (HAMD-D17 = 24).
Measured: Baseline; Following Week 2 of 6-week intervention Following Week 4 of 6-week intervention; 12-weeks post-intervention; 24-weeks post-intervention
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted23 Sep 2022
- Study start31 Mar 2025
- Primary completion15 Apr 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion29 Oct 2027 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Spinal Cord InjuriesStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by VA Office of Research and DevelopmentThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Participants will: 1. undergo high-resolution T1- and T2-weighted MRI scanning. These images will be used for image guided TMS assessments and e-field calculations for rTMS intensity. 2. undergo rTMS to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) as a treatment approach for depression. Treatment (active or sham) will be performed five times/week for six weeks (30 sessions). A total of 3,000 pulses/session will be delivered at 10Hz (4 seconds on and 26 seconds off) for a total of 75 stimulation cycles that lasts 37.5 minutes. The intensity will be individualized, as it will be based on reverse-calculation electric-field modeling. Participants receiving sham stimulation will undergo the same procedures as active rTMS except that a coil specifically designed to provide sham stimulation that is double-blinded will be utilized.
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 24 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- VA Office of Research and Development
- Sponsor type
- US federal agency
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Catherine J VanDerwerker, PhD DPT PT, Principal investigator, Ralph H. Johnson VA Medical Center, Charleston, SC
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05553353
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- D3972-W
- Other IDs
- 1IK2RX003972-01A1
- Status last verified
- Jan 2026
- First submitted
- 20 Sep 2022
- Last updated
- 14 Jan 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 14 Jan 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Evaluating a Novel Method to Determine the rTMS Dose Needed for Treating Depression After Spinal Cord Injury
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05553353
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- D3972-W
- Conditions
- Spinal Cord Injuries, Depression, Depressive Disorder, Major
- Keywords
- Spinal Cord Injuries, Depression, Depressive Disorder, Major, Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 24 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- VA Office of Research and DevelopmentUS federal agency
- Study start
- 31 Mar 2025 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 15 Apr 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 29 Oct 2027 (estimated)
- First posted
- 23 Sep 2022 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Depression is a leading cause of disability worldwide and is more commonly seen in individual's post-spinal cord injury (SCI) than in the general population. Depression post-SCI impacts an individuals' quality of life and recovery. It has been reported that among Veterans with an SCI, those without depression live longer than those with depression. Thus, depression must be treated appropriately. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is an FDA-approved treatment for depression, but dosing is based on a motor response or movement in the thumb. Over half of individuals with SCI have some degree of arm or hand impairment, so these individuals might not be eligible for rTMS, or they may receive the wrong dose. This study proposes clinical trial in individuals with depression post-SCI to assess the anti-depressant effect of a novel technique to dose rTMS that does not require a motor response in the thumb. By gaining a better understanding of the application of rTMS for depression post-SCI, the investigators aim to advance the rehabilitative care of Veterans.
Detailed description
Depression is a leading cause of disability worldwide and is one of the most prevalent neuropsychiatric manifestations following spinal cord injury (SCI). Based on an estimated 42,000 Veterans having an SCI1 and an estimated prevalence of depression among Veterans post-SCI of 19-28%, nearly 12,000 Veterans with SCI have comorbid depression at any time. The burden of depression post-SCI is significant, as it can impact quality of life and is associated with increased healthcare utilization and higher mortality. As noted by the updated Clinical Practice Guidelines from the Paralyzed Veterans of America, treating depression is essential, but further research is needed specifically within the SCI population to help formulate stronger evidence-based guidelines.
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), a type of non-invasive brain stimulation, is an FDA-approved treatment option for major depressive disorder (MDD) that is utilized throughout the Veterans Affairs (VA) health system. However, to date, no published studies have examined its effectiveness post-SCI. A critical challenge for widespread administration of rTMS for depression post-SCI is dosing, as the resting motor threshold (rMT), a motor response to transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), of the right abductor pollicis brevis (APB) is used to dose rTMS. Approximately 60% of the SCI population has incomplete or complete tetraplegia, indicating some degree of upper extremity (UE) impairment, making rMT not reliably attainable. Thus, it is plausible to conclude that over half the SCI population could be excluded from receiving rTMS treatment for depression or may receive an improper dose, impacting its safety and effectiveness. This represents a major gap in the field of SCI rehabilitation in that a large portion of individuals with SCI have concurrent MDD. As such, evidence-based treatment options are necessary to address the needs of this large clinical cohort, thereby improving the lives of these Veterans, their caregivers, and their families.
This study will examine the potential of rTMS, dosed by reverse-calculation electric-field modeling, to improve depressive symptoms in individuals with MDD post-SCI via a randomized, 2-arm, sham-controlled pilot clinical trial. Over four years, twenty-four individual post-SCI with MDD will be enrolled and randomized to receive 6 weeks (5 sessions/week) of either active or sham rTMS treatment. Using an unbalanced design, a quarter of the sample (n=6) randomized to the sham group and the remainder (n=18) randomized to receive active rTMS. Dosing parameters will follow the FDA-approved protocol of 3,000 pulses/session at 10Hz, and intensity will be determined by reverse-calculation electric-field modeling. The primary outcome measure for this study will be the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression-17. Participants will also complete a 12- and 24-week post-intervention follow-up assessments. It is hypothesized that rTMS treatment dosed using reverse-calculation electric-field modeling will result in a moderate between-group effect size favoring the anti-depressant benefits of rTMS treatment (vs. sham).
In addition to its established anti-depressive effects, rTMS has also been shown to improve patient-reported outcomes such as quality of life and depression-related disability. An extremely exciting possibility is that effective treatment of MDD results in a virtuous cycle whereby reducing depression concomitantly facilitates improvements in other psychosocial domains. The second aim seeks to explore this possibility by determining the extent to which improvements in depressive symptoms are associated with changes in quality of life and participation in Veterans post-SCI with MDD. This trial is an essential step toward optimizing SCI rehabilitation, while simultaneously providing a unique opportunity to study the effects of depression on psychosocial responses to rehabilitation.
The data generated could inform the development of additional interventions focused on neuromodulation to improve function and quality of life for individuals following SCI and other clinical cohorts with upper extremity motor impairment, (e.g., traumatic brain injury, multiple sclerosis, amputees) who otherwise may not be able to benefit from the anti-depressant effects of rTMS treatment.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Participants will: 1. undergo high-resolution T1- and T2-weighted MRI scanning. These images will be used for image guided TMS assessments and e-field calculations for rTMS intensity. 2. undergo rTMS to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) as a treatment approach for depression. Treatment (active or sham) will be performed five times/week for six weeks (30 sessions). A total of 3,000 pulses/session will be delivered at 10Hz (4 seconds on and 26 seconds off) for a total of 75 stimulation cycles that lasts 37.5 minutes. The intensity will be individualized, as it will be based on reverse-calculation electric-field modeling. Participants receiving sham stimulation will undergo the same procedures as active rTMS except that a coil specifically designed to provide sham stimulation that is double-blinded will be utilized.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Active rTMS | Experimental | Device: repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation--ActiveActive repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) that will be administered 5 days/week for 6 weeks. Intensity will be individualized based on reverse-calculation electric-field modeling. |
| Sham rTMS | Sham comparator | Device: repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation--ShamSham repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) that will be administered 5 days/week for 6 weeks. Intensity will be individualized based on reverse-calculation electric-field modeling, but a sham treatment coil will be used; thus, no active treatment will be administered. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 60 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- cervical or thoracic spinal cord injury at least 6 months prior with AIS A, B, C, or D;
- 18 - 60 years of age;
- major depressive disorder, as identified by Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-V;
- Hamilton Depression Rating Scale-17 score > 18;
- not taking antidepressant medications or no change in doses of psychotropic medication(s) for at least 4 weeks before the study (6 weeks if newly initiated medication)
Key exclusion criteria (12 listed)
- concomitant neurologic diseases/disorders or dementia;
- cognitive impairment (Montreal Cognitive Assessment <17);
- history of psychosis or other Axis I disorder that is primary;
- positive screen for bipolar disorder through the Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview;
- history of claustrophobia;
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation--ActiveAlso: rTMSRepetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is a type of non-invasive brain stimulation. An active coil will be used to administer the active rTMS. | Device | Active rTMS |
| repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation--ShamAlso: rTMSRepetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is a type of non-invasive brain stimulation. A sham coil will be used to administer the sham rTMS. | Device | Sham rTMS |
Primary outcome
Change from baseline in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale-17 (HAM-D17) score immediately post-intervention
Time frame: Baseline; Following Week 2 of 6-week intervention Following Week 4 of 6-week intervention; Immediately post-intervention; 12-weeks post-intervention; 24-weeks post-intervention
The Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D17) is the most widely used tool to assess the severity of depressive symptoms, once diagnosed, and will be used in this study. The HAM-D17 is a semi-structured interview style questionnaire that asks about one's experience with seventeen different depressive symptoms over the past week. Total HAM-D17 scores range from no depressive symptoms (HAM-D17 = 0-7); mild (HAM-D17 = 8-16), moderate (HAM-D17 = 17-23) or severe depressive symptoms (HAMD-D17 = 24).
6 secondary outcomes
Change from baseline in Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire-Short Form (Q-LES-Q-SF) at timepoints noted below
Time frame: Baseline; Following Week 2 of 6-week intervention Following Week 4 of 6-week intervention; Immediately post-intervention; 12-weeks post-intervention; 24-weeks post-intervention
Change from baseline in Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) Score at timepoints noted below
Time frame: Baseline; Following Week 2 of 6-week intervention Following Week 4 of 6-week intervention; Immediately post-intervention; 12-weeks post-intervention; 24-weeks post-intervention
Change from baseline in Leisure Time Physical Activity Questionnaire for People with Spinal Cord Injury (LTPAQ-SCI) Score at timepoints noted below
Time frame: Baseline; Following Week 2 of 6-week intervention Following Week 4 of 6-week intervention; Immediately post-intervention; 12-weeks post-intervention; 24-weeks post-intervention
Change from baseline in Craig Handicap Assessment and Reporting Tool - Short Form (CHART-SF) Score at timepoints noted below
Time frame: Baseline; Following Week 2 of 6-week intervention Following Week 4 of 6-week intervention; Immediately post-intervention; 12-weeks post-intervention; 24-weeks post-intervention
Change from baseline in Reintegration to Normal Living Index (RNL) Score at timepoints noted below
Time frame: Baseline; Following Week 2 of 6-week intervention Following Week 4 of 6-week intervention; Immediately post-intervention; 12-weeks post-intervention; 24-weeks post-intervention
Change from baseline Hamilton Depression Rating Scale-17 (HAM-D17) Score at timepoints noted below
Time frame: Baseline; Following Week 2 of 6-week intervention Following Week 4 of 6-week intervention; 12-weeks post-intervention; 24-weeks post-intervention
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 14 Jan 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Spinal Cord Injuries
Recruiting
Evaluating Long-term Use of a Pediatric Robotic Exoskeleton (P.REX/Agilik) to Improve Gait in Children With Movement Disorders
Cerebral Palsy, Muscular Dystrophy
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Nerve Transfer Surgery to Restore Upper-limb Function After Cervical Spinal Cord Injury
Spinal Cord Injury, Spinal Cord Injury at C5-C7 Level
Recruiting
Implementing a Decision Support Tool to Prevent Community-Acquired Pressure Injury in Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) in the Spinal Cord Injury Clinic
Spinal Cord Injury, Pressure Injury
Recruiting
Feasibility of the BrainGate2 Neural Interface System in Persons With Tetraplegia (BG-Tablet-01)
Brainstem Stroke, ALS
Recruiting
A Neuroprosthesis for Seated Posture and Balance
Spinal Cord Injury, Paralysis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Catherine J VanDerwerker, PhD DPT PT principal investigator
Ralph H. Johnson VA Medical Center, Charleston, SC
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation--Active in people with Spinal Cord Injuries and Depression, run by VA Office of Research and Development at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 12 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 Jan 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Catherine J VanDerwerker, PhD DPT PT ((843) 792-5047, catherine.vanderwerker@va.gov), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change from baseline in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale-17 (HAM-D17) score immediately post-intervention (time frame: Baseline; Following Week 2 of 6-week intervention Following Week 4 of 6-week intervention; Immediately post-intervention; 12-weeks post-intervention; 24-weeks post-intervention). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 Jan 2026.