AzTrials
AzTrials

PainPhase 2/3NCT05508594

Efficacy and Pharmacokinetic-Pharmacodynamic Relationship of Intranasally Administered Sufentanil, Ketamine, and CT001

A Phase 2/3 study testing CT001, Sufentanil and Ketamine in people with Pain, run by Cessatech A/S at 1 site in Denmark.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

A randomised, double-blind, parallel-group, study comparing the analgesic effect of intranasal CT001 to intranasal sufentanil, intranasal ketamine or placebo for treatment of acute pain in adults undergoing surgical removal of an impacted mandibular third molar, where bone removal is judged to be needed. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 55 years
Conditions the study is for
Pain
What is being tested?
CT001, Sufentanil and Ketamine
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
220 participants
Where
1 siteDenmark
Study dates
5 Sep 2022to 5 Oct 2023
Phase
Phase 2/3
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 55 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Healthy (The American Society of Anaesthesiologists' Physical Classification System (ASA) I-II) male or female participants scheduled for surgical removal of an impacted mandibular third molar, where bone removal is judged to be needed
  • Age: ≥ 18 and < 56 years
  • Body Mass index above (>)18.5 or below (<) 30.0 kg/m2
  • Prior to randomisation: Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NRS anchored by 0 = "no pain", 10 = "worst pain imaginable") ≥ 5 at rest within 4 hours after the administration of the last dose of local anaesthetic

Who cannot join

  • Current or history of any clinically significant disease or disorder, which, in the opinion of the investigator, may put the potential subject at risk when participating in the study, or influence the potential subject's ability to participate in the study or influence the study results.
  • Any clinically significant illness, medical/surgical procedure or trauma within 4 weeks of the administration of investigational product that is likely to introduce additional risk factors, jeopardize study integrity, or to interfere with the study assessments or procedure
  • History of increased bleeding tendency
  • Clinically significant mental illness
  • Opioid Risk Tool score of >3
  • Pain Catastrophizing Scale score, total points >30
Show all 10Show fewer
  • Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), points ≥ 11 for anxiety or ≥ 11 points for depression
  • Daily intake of analgesics
  • History of alcohol or drug abuse or use of illicit drugs or positive screen for drugs of abuse at screening or on admission to the Clinic prior to the administration of the investigational product.
  • Abnormal nasal cavity/airway

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Denmark1 site
  • DanTrials

    Copenhagen, NV, 2400

Other trials in Denmark

About this study

Official title: Analgesic Efficacy and Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic Relationship of Intranasally Administered Sufentanil, Ketamine, and CT001 After Impacted Mandibular Third Molar Extraction - A Double-blind, Randomised, Placebo-controlled Study

A randomised, double-blind, parallel-group, study comparing the analgesic effect of intranasal CT001 to intranasal sufentanil, intranasal ketamine or placebo for treatment of acute pain in adults undergoing surgical removal of an impacted mandibular third molar, where bone removal is judged to be needed.

Conditions
Pain
Being tested
CT001, Placebo, Sufentanil, Ketamine
Medical subject headings
Pain

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • CT001Drug

    Intranasal

  • PlaceboDrug

    Intranasal

  • SufentanilDrug

    Intranasal

  • KetamineDrug

    Intranasal

Study groups in NCT05508594
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
CT001ExperimentalNot described
Receives: Drug: CT001
PlaceboPlacebo comparatorNot described
Receives: Drug: Placebo
Sufentanil 27 mcgActive comparatorNot described
Receives: Drug: Sufentanil
Ketamine 27 mgActive comparatorNot described
Receives: Drug: Ketamine
Sufentanil 13 mcgActive comparatorNot described
Receives: Drug: Sufentanil
Ketamine 13 mgActive comparatorNot described
Receives: Drug: Ketamine
Sufentanil 40 mcgActive comparatorNot described
Receives: Drug: Sufentanil
Ketamine 40 mgActive comparatorNot described
Receives: Drug: Ketamine
Sufentanil 13 mcg/Ketamine 13 mgActive comparatorNot described
Receives: Drug: Sufentanil; Drug: Ketamine
Sufentanil 13 mcg/Ketamine 27 mgActive comparatorNot described
Receives: Drug: Sufentanil; Drug: Ketamine
Sufentanil 13 mcg/Ketamine 40 mgActive comparatorNot described
Receives: Drug: Sufentanil; Drug: Ketamine
Sufentanil 27 mcg/Ketamine 13 mgActive comparatorNot described
Receives: Drug: Sufentanil; Drug: Ketamine
Sufentanil 27 mcg/Ketamine 40 mgActive comparatorNot described
Receives: Drug: Sufentanil; Drug: Ketamine
Sufentanil 40 mcg/Ketamine 13 mgActive comparatorNot described
Receives: Drug: Sufentanil; Drug: Ketamine
Sufentanil 40 mcg/Ketamine 27 mgActive comparatorNot described
Receives: Drug: Sufentanil; Drug: Ketamine
Sufentanil 40 mcg/Ketamine 40 mgActive comparatorNot described
Receives: Drug: Sufentanil; Drug: Ketamine

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Sum of pain intensity differences at 55 min

    Derived from pain intensity scores measured by the Numerical Rating Scale (0-10, 0= no pain, 10= worst possible pain).

    Measured: 0-55 min

  2. PK-PD relationship for analgesic efficacy IN sufentanil, IN ketamine and IN CT001

    To assess the relationship between analgesic efficacy and the plasma concentrations of intranasal sufentanil, intranasal ketamine and intranasal CT001.

    Measured: 0-180 min

Secondary outcomes (13)
  1. Maximum Pain intensity difference (PIDmax)

    Measured: 0-180 min

  2. Time to meaningful pain relief

    Time when participants feel that the pain relief becomes meaningful to them

    Measured: 0-180 min

  3. Sum of pain intensity differences at 30 min

    Derived from pain intensity scores measured on the Numerical Rating Scale (0-10, 0= no pain, 10= worst possible

    Measured: 0-30 min

  4. Rescue medication

    Number of participants receiving rescue medication

    Measured: 0-180 min

  5. Number of patients who are considered a responder/non-responder, 30%

    Number of participants with at least 30% reduction in pain intensity score compared to baseline

    Measured: 0-30 min

  6. Number of patients who are considered a responder/non-responder, 50%

    Participants with at least at least 50% reduction in pain intensity score compared to baseline

    Measured: 0-30 min

  7. Sum of pain intensity differences at 90 min

    Derived from pain intensity scores measured on the Numerical Rating Scale (0-10, 0= no pain, 10= worst possible

    Measured: 0-90 min

  8. Time to perceptible pain relief

    Time when participants feel that the pain relief becomes meaningful to them

    Measured: 0-180 min

  9. Time to rescue medication

    Measured: 0-180 min

  10. Mean pain intensity difference (PID) from baseline at rest

    Measured: 0-180 min

  11. Mean pain intensity difference (PID) from baseline on jaw movement

    Measured: 0-181 min

  12. Ramsay sedation score

    Change from baseline in Ramsay sedation score (1= agitated, anxious, restless, 6= unarousable)

    Measured: 0-179 min

  13. Median time to a request for rescue medication

    Measured: 0-180 min

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted19 Aug 2022
  2. Study start5 Sep 2022
  3. Primary completion5 Oct 2023
  4. Study completion5 Oct 2023

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2/3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
220 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05508594
Sponsor's protocol ID
PDC 01-0205
Status last verified
May 2023
First submitted
17 Aug 2022
Last updated
18 Oct 2023
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2/3 study testing CT001, Sufentanil and Ketamine in people with Pain, run by Cessatech A/S at 1 site in Denmark.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Oct 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Denmark. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this combined phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Sum of pain intensity differences at 55 min (time frame: 0-55 min). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Oct 2023; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 8 Nov 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in