Neuromuscular BlockadeNCT05474638
Comparison of Mechanomyographic 100 Versus 200 Hz 5 Second Tetanic Fade Ratios During Neuromuscular Block Recovery
A study testing Isometric Thumb Force (isometric mechanomyography) compared to TOF-Watch SX (acceleromyography) in people with Neuromuscular Blockade, run by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire UCLouvain Namur at 1 site in Belgium.
Trial summary
Two recent pilot studies suggested the potential interest of 100 and 200 Hz tetanic stimulations to detect with mechanomyography (MMG) very low levels of residual neuromuscular blockade (NMB). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Neuromuscular Blockade
- What is being tested?
- Isometric Thumb Force (isometric mechanomyography) compared to TOF-Watch SX (acceleromyography)
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 20 participants
- Where
- 1 siteBelgium
- Study dates
- 25 Oct 2022to 23 Mar 2023
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- ASA I-II
- written informed consent
- general anesthesia for rhino(septo)plasty
Who cannot join
- pregnant or breastfeeding women
- patients with renal or hepatic insufficiency
- patients with neurological disorders
- patients with a suspected allergy to the drugs used in the protocol
- patients receiving medications that could interfere with neuromuscular transmission
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Two recent pilot studies suggested the potential interest of 100 and 200 Hz tetanic stimulations to detect with mechanomyography (MMG) very low levels of residual neuromuscular blockade (NMB). The Tetanic Fade Ratio (TFR, residual force after 5 seconds / maximal force) measured quantitatively by MMG during tetanic stimulation at 100 or 200 Hz could provide today a more consistent response than the train-of-four (TOF) ratio provided by acceleromyography (AMG) to this search for detection of low levels of residual NMB.
This study was designed to evaluate for the first time in anesthetized patients the evolution of NMB spontaneous recovery with 5-second 100 and 200 Hz tetanic stimulations compared to TOF, and to test the hypothesis that a 200 Hz TFR would better and longer detect low levels of residual paralysis than AMG TOF ratio and 100 Hz TFR.
Read the detailed description
MATERIALS AND METHODS Patient management The monocentric study protocol was approved before patients' inclusion by the Institutional Ethical Committee (CHU UCL Namur, Yvoir, Belgium, OM 050, under unique belgian registration number B0392022000035).
It was performed in accordance with the ethical standards of the Declaration of Helsinki and was included in the Clinical Trials Registry (XXX).
After obtaining written informed consent from all participants, 20 patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grades I to II (aged 18 to 65 years), who were scheduled to undergo rhinoplasty or rhinoseptoplasty under general anaesthesia, were included in the study. The exclusion criteria were pregnant or breastfeeding women, patients with renal or hepatic insufficiency, patients with neurological disorders, and any patient with a suspected allergy to the drugs used in the protocol or receiving medications that could interfere with neuromuscular transmission. The patient's height, weight, age, and sex were recorded in the protocol to define the population investigated.
The patients were conventionally monitored with a pulse oximeter, a three-lead electrocardiogram and a non-invasive blood pressure monitor scheduled in automatic mode at 5-minute intervals. An intravenous catheter was inserted into their forearm for crystalloid infusion (side at random). Neuromuscular transmission monitoring (NMTM) was set up according to a specific protocol.
Total intravenous anaesthesia was induced with continuous infusion of remifentanil 0.25 µg/kg/min and continuous infusion of propofol 1% to obtain theoretical plasma concentrations ranging from 3 to 6 µg/mL (Diprifusor Cardinal Health, Basingstoke, UK). Lidocaine 1 mg/kg was also given as an intravenous bolus. After loss of consciousness, manual ventilation was provided during NMTM calibration and the initial NMB baseline measurements. Then, rocuronium 0.45 mg/kg was administered. Non-invasive automatic blood pressure measurement was suspended during the neuromuscular onset to avoid dissimilar distribution of the rocuronium in the two arms. Tracheal intubation was performed when the TOF count reached zero. Automatic non-invasive blood pressure measurement was reactivated. Mechanical ventilation (closed circuit, 40% oxygen in air) maintained end-tidal CO2 within the normal range. Anesthesia was maintained with the continuous intravenous administration of remifentanil 0.15 µg/kg/min and propofol with a target plasma concentration of 2 to 4 µg/mL. Blankets prevented heat loss from the body and both arms, and the oropharyngeal temperature was kept stable. Postoperative analgesia was provided with paracetamol, tramadol and alizapride at the end of surgery.
Neuromuscular transmission monitoring
All recordings were performed during general anesthesia. The skin was cleaned with diethyl ether, and two electrodes were placed above the ulnar nerve on each wrist.
A TOF-Watch SX® (Alvesia Pharma, France) (TWSX) was set on the left hand. The accelerometric transducer was taped on the thumb's pulp, and the hand was inserted and held inside an SL TOF tube. Another TOF-Watch® (Organon-Technika, Copenhagen, Denmark) designed to deliver high-frequency tetanic stimulations (including 100 and 200 Hz) was connected to the electrodes on the right arm, which was equipped with an Isometric Thumb Force (ITF®) handgrip designed to record the force (N) of isometric thumb adduction during electrical stimulations. The Visual-ITF® software recorded all measurements for further off-line analysis. Each tetanic signal was described in a 5 sec window starting from the 1 Newton value. If this 1N threshold was not reached, the recording was excluded from the analysis.
Both arms were positioned alongside the body on soft padding to protect nerve structures from any extra focal pressure.
Supra-maximal stimulation and initial calibration were obtained using the TWSX internal automatic sequence, and the current intensity displayed was applied on both sides. Then, TOF stimulations were applied at 15-second intervals during a short stabilisation period. On the TWSX side, four T4/T1 ratios were recorded to determine the initial baseline (mean of four values) before NMBA administration. On the ITF side, two consecutive tetanic stimulations (100 and 200 Hz at random) were applied for 5 seconds, with a two-minute interval to avoid any potentiation. Consecutive TOF stimulations every 15 seconds were applied to monitor the NMB, from the onset and, during surgery, until the spontaneous recovery of a normalized TOF ratio of 0.9 on the TWSX side and even further. Both tetanic stimulations (same order as previously) were applied alternately with 2-minute intervals on several steps of recovery and until recovering 90% of the initial TFR with both stimulation patterns.
Data collection and statistical analysis On the TWSX side, the TOF ratio provided after each 2Hz TOF stimulation was displayed and recorded. We calculated 90% of the initial baseline mean value to determine the normalised TOF ratio 0.9 recovery threshold using the following formula: normalised TOF ratio 0.9 = sum of 4 TOF ratio × 9/40, with the result rounded up.
On the ITF side, a Tetanic Fade Ratio (TFR) was determined to quantify any fade occurring during the muscle contraction: referring to the resting level just before the contraction, the residual force at the end of 5 seconds of stimulation was divided by the maximal force obtained during the contraction to provide a ratio.
Based on a previous pilot study using the same material and the same stimulating patterns, a sample of 20 patients was determined to provide a significant difference between the TFRs recorded with 100 and 200 Hz tetanic stimulations at the time of AMG TOF ratio 0.9 recovery. We expected to have enough power (0.8 at that stage) to detect a significant difference during an additional period of recovery. The alpha error was 0.05.
Off-line data analysis was based on the archived files. Using R software version 3.3.6 (R Project for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria), Student's t-tests were performed to compare the TFR obtained after 100- or 200-Hz stimulations at initial baseline and at several classical levels of spontaneous recovery on the TWSX side:
- TOF count 1,
- TOF ratio 0.5,
- TOF ratio 0.9
- Normalized TOF ratio 0.9
- TOF ratio 0.95
- TOF ratio 1.0 Then, both tetanic stimulations were repeated every 5 minutes until TFR reached 0.9 to quantify any further period of analysis of low levels of residual blockade.
- Conditions
- Neuromuscular Blockade
- Being tested
- Isometric Thumb Force (isometric mechanomyography) compared to TOF-Watch SX (acceleromyography)
- Keywords
- Residual neuromuscular block, Mechanomyography, Tetanic nerve stimulation
- Medical subject headings
- Delayed Emergence from Anesthesia
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Isometric Thumb Force (isometric mechanomyography) compared to TOF-Watch SX (acceleromyography)Device
Comparison of mechanomyographic measurements of thumb adduction's force induced by 100 versus 200 Hz 5 seconds tetanic ulnar nerve stimulation during neuromuscular block spontaneous recovery monitored by acceleromyography on the controlateral arm.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Controlateral and simultaneous comparison of neuromuscular transmission monitors | Other | Controlateral and simultaneous comparison of responses from acceleromyography- and mechanomyography-based neuromuscular transmission monitors in the same patients. Receives: Device: Isometric Thumb Force (isometric mechanomyography) compared to TOF-Watch SX (acceleromyography) |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
100 vs 200 Hz Tetanic Fade Ratio comparison
To compare 100 and 200 Hz TFR at different literature based spontaneous recovery levels recorded by acceleromyography on the other arm: TOF count 1, TOF ratio 0.5 and TOF ratio 0.9 / normalized 0.9 / 0.95 / 1.0.
Measured: During surgery while the neuromuscular block spontaneously recovers from AMG TOF count 1 until TOF ratio 1.0
Secondary outcomes (1)
Quantification of any remaining MMG fade with 200 Hz stimulation after AMG TOF ratio 0.9 recovery
To quantify any significant deeper fade occurring with 200 Hz compared to 100 Hz during further stages of spontaneous recovery.
Measured: During surgery while the neuromuscular block spontaneously recovers from AMG TOF ratio 0.9 until MMG 200 Hz TFR > 0.9
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted26 Jul 2022
- Study start25 Oct 2022
- Primary completion23 Mar 2023
- Study completion23 Mar 2023
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (16)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Neuromuscular BlockadeStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Model description
- Controlateral and simultaneous comparison of two different neuromuscular transmission monitorings in a cohort of 20 anesthetised patients.
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 20 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire UCLouvain Namur
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Philippe Dubois, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire UCLouvain Namur
- Investigators
- Alain D'Hollander, Prof, Study chair, Fondation pour l'Anesthésie-Réanimation, Vaduz
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05474638
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- TFR 100 vs 200 Hz
- Status last verified
- Mar 2023
- First submitted
- 15 Jul 2022
- Last updated
- 27 Mar 2023
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Ali HH, Utting JE, Gray C. Stimulus frequency in the detection of neuromuscular block in humans. Br J Anaesth. 1970 Nov;42(11):967-78. doi: 10.1093/bja/42.11.967. No abstract available.
PubMed 5488360Gissen AJ, Katz RL. Twitch, tetanus and posttetanic potentiation as indices of nerve-muscle block in man. Anesthesiology. 1969 May;30(5):481-7. doi: 10.1097/00000542-196905000-00001. No abstract available.
PubMed 4305092Waud BE, Waud DR. The relation between tetanic fade and receptor occlusion in the presence of competitive neuromuscular block. Anesthesiology. 1971 Nov;35(5):456-64. doi: 10.1097/00000542-197111000-00003. No abstract available.
PubMed 4329144Fuchs-Buder T, Claudius C, Skovgaard LT, Eriksson LI, Mirakhur RK, Viby-Mogensen J; 8th International Neuromuscular Meeting. Good clinical research practice in pharmacodynamic studies of neuromuscular blocking agents II: the Stockholm revision. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2007 Aug;51(7):789-808. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2007.01352.x.
PubMed 17635389Ali HH, Savarese JJ, Lebowitz PW, Ramsey FM. Twitch, tetanus and train-of-four as indices of recovery from nondepolarizing neuromuscular blockade. Anesthesiology. 1981 Apr;54(4):294-7. doi: 10.1097/00000542-198104000-00007.
PubMed 6452074Stanec A, Heyduk J, Stanec G, Orkin LR. Tetanic fade and post-tetanic tension in the absence of neuromuscular blocking agents in anesthetized man. Anesth Analg. 1978 Jan-Feb;57(1):102-7. doi: 10.1213/00000539-197801000-00019.
PubMed 204226Kopman AF, Epstein RH, Flashburg MH. Use of 100-Hertz tetanus as an index of recovery from pancuronium-induced non-depolarizing neuromuscular blockade. Anesth Analg. 1982 May;61(5):439-41.
PubMed 7199868Eikermann M, Vogt FM, Herbstreit F, Vahid-Dastgerdi M, Zenge MO, Ochterbeck C, de Greiff A, Peters J. The predisposition to inspiratory upper airway collapse during partial neuromuscular blockade. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2007 Jan 1;175(1):9-15. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200512-1862OC. Epub 2006 Oct 5.
PubMed 17023729Plaud B, Debaene B, Donati F, Marty J. Residual paralysis after emergence from anesthesia. Anesthesiology. 2010 Apr;112(4):1013-22. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181cded07. No abstract available.
PubMed 20234315Kirmeier E, Eriksson LI, Lewald H, Jonsson Fagerlund M, Hoeft A, Hollmann M, Meistelman C, Hunter JM, Ulm K, Blobner M; POPULAR Contributors. Post-anaesthesia pulmonary complications after use of muscle relaxants (POPULAR): a multicentre, prospective observational study. Lancet Respir Med. 2019 Feb;7(2):129-140. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(18)30294-7. Epub 2018 Sep 14.
PubMed 30224322Blobner M, Hunter JM, Meistelman C, Hoeft A, Hollmann MW, Kirmeier E, Lewald H, Ulm K. Use of a train-of-four ratio of 0.95 versus 0.9 for tracheal extubation: an exploratory analysis of POPULAR data. Br J Anaesth. 2020 Jan;124(1):63-72. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2019.08.023. Epub 2019 Oct 10.
PubMed 31607388Capron F, Alla F, Hottier C, Meistelman C, Fuchs-Buder T. Can acceleromyography detect low levels of residual paralysis? A probability approach to detect a mechanomyographic train-of-four ratio of 0.9. Anesthesiology. 2004 May;100(5):1119-24. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200405000-00013.
PubMed 15114208Suzuki T, Fukano N, Kitajima O, Saeki S, Ogawa S. Normalization of acceleromyographic train-of-four ratio by baseline value for detecting residual neuromuscular block. Br J Anaesth. 2006 Jan;96(1):44-7. doi: 10.1093/bja/aei273. Epub 2005 Nov 18.
PubMed 16299046Dubois PE, Mitchell J, Regnier M, Passeraub PA, Moreillon F, d'Hollander AA. The interest of 100 versus 200 Hz tetanic stimulations to quantify low levels of residual neuromuscular blockade with mechanomyography: a pilot study. J Clin Monit Comput. 2022 Aug;36(4):1131-1137. doi: 10.1007/s10877-021-00745-6. Epub 2021 Jul 24.
PubMed 34302578Debaene B, Frasca D, Moreillon F, D'Hollander AA. 100 Hz-5 s tetanic stimulation to illustrate the presence of "residual paralysis" co-existing with accelerometric 0.90 train-of-four ratio-A proof-of-concept study. Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med. 2021 Aug;40(4):100903. doi: 10.1016/j.accpm.2021.100903. Epub 2021 Jun 17.
PubMed 34147687
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 27 Mar 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Comparison of Mechanomyographic 100 Versus 200 Hz 5 Second Tetanic Fade Ratios During Neuromuscular Block Recovery
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05474638
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- TFR 100 vs 200 Hz
- Conditions
- Neuromuscular Blockade
- Keywords
- Residual neuromuscular block, Mechanomyography, Tetanic nerve stimulation
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 20 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire UCLouvain NamurUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 25 Oct 2022 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 23 Mar 2023 (actual)
- Study completion
- 23 Mar 2023 (actual)
- First posted
- 26 Jul 2022 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Two recent pilot studies suggested the potential interest of 100 and 200 Hz tetanic stimulations to detect with mechanomyography (MMG) very low levels of residual neuromuscular blockade (NMB). The Tetanic Fade Ratio (TFR, residual force after 5 seconds / maximal force) measured quantitatively by MMG during tetanic stimulation at 100 or 200 Hz could provide today a more consistent response than the train-of-four (TOF) ratio provided by acceleromyography (AMG) to this search for detection of low levels of residual NMB.
This study was designed to evaluate for the first time in anesthetized patients the evolution of NMB spontaneous recovery with 5-second 100 and 200 Hz tetanic stimulations compared to TOF, and to test the hypothesis that a 200 Hz TFR would better and longer detect low levels of residual paralysis than AMG TOF ratio and 100 Hz TFR.
Detailed description
MATERIALS AND METHODS Patient management The monocentric study protocol was approved before patients' inclusion by the Institutional Ethical Committee (CHU UCL Namur, Yvoir, Belgium, OM 050, under unique belgian registration number B0392022000035).
It was performed in accordance with the ethical standards of the Declaration of Helsinki and was included in the Clinical Trials Registry (XXX).
After obtaining written informed consent from all participants, 20 patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grades I to II (aged 18 to 65 years), who were scheduled to undergo rhinoplasty or rhinoseptoplasty under general anaesthesia, were included in the study. The exclusion criteria were pregnant or breastfeeding women, patients with renal or hepatic insufficiency, patients with neurological disorders, and any patient with a suspected allergy to the drugs used in the protocol or receiving medications that could interfere with neuromuscular transmission. The patient's height, weight, age, and sex were recorded in the protocol to define the population investigated.
The patients were conventionally monitored with a pulse oximeter, a three-lead electrocardiogram and a non-invasive blood pressure monitor scheduled in automatic mode at 5-minute intervals. An intravenous catheter was inserted into their forearm for crystalloid infusion (side at random). Neuromuscular transmission monitoring (NMTM) was set up according to a specific protocol.
Total intravenous anaesthesia was induced with continuous infusion of remifentanil 0.25 µg/kg/min and continuous infusion of propofol 1% to obtain theoretical plasma concentrations ranging from 3 to 6 µg/mL (Diprifusor Cardinal Health, Basingstoke, UK). Lidocaine 1 mg/kg was also given as an intravenous bolus. After loss of consciousness, manual ventilation was provided during NMTM calibration and the initial NMB baseline measurements. Then, rocuronium 0.45 mg/kg was administered. Non-invasive automatic blood pressure measurement was suspended during the neuromuscular onset to avoid dissimilar distribution of the rocuronium in the two arms. Tracheal intubation was performed when the TOF count reached zero. Automatic non-invasive blood pressure measurement was reactivated. Mechanical ventilation (closed circuit, 40% oxygen in air) maintained end-tidal CO2 within the normal range. Anesthesia was maintained with the continuous intravenous administration of remifentanil 0.15 µg/kg/min and propofol with a target plasma concentration of 2 to 4 µg/mL. Blankets prevented heat loss from the body and both arms, and the oropharyngeal temperature was kept stable. Postoperative analgesia was provided with paracetamol, tramadol and alizapride at the end of surgery.
Neuromuscular transmission monitoring
All recordings were performed during general anesthesia. The skin was cleaned with diethyl ether, and two electrodes were placed above the ulnar nerve on each wrist.
A TOF-Watch SX® (Alvesia Pharma, France) (TWSX) was set on the left hand. The accelerometric transducer was taped on the thumb's pulp, and the hand was inserted and held inside an SL TOF tube. Another TOF-Watch® (Organon-Technika, Copenhagen, Denmark) designed to deliver high-frequency tetanic stimulations (including 100 and 200 Hz) was connected to the electrodes on the right arm, which was equipped with an Isometric Thumb Force (ITF®) handgrip designed to record the force (N) of isometric thumb adduction during electrical stimulations. The Visual-ITF® software recorded all measurements for further off-line analysis. Each tetanic signal was described in a 5 sec window starting from the 1 Newton value. If this 1N threshold was not reached, the recording was excluded from the analysis.
Both arms were positioned alongside the body on soft padding to protect nerve structures from any extra focal pressure.
Supra-maximal stimulation and initial calibration were obtained using the TWSX internal automatic sequence, and the current intensity displayed was applied on both sides. Then, TOF stimulations were applied at 15-second intervals during a short stabilisation period. On the TWSX side, four T4/T1 ratios were recorded to determine the initial baseline (mean of four values) before NMBA administration. On the ITF side, two consecutive tetanic stimulations (100 and 200 Hz at random) were applied for 5 seconds, with a two-minute interval to avoid any potentiation. Consecutive TOF stimulations every 15 seconds were applied to monitor the NMB, from the onset and, during surgery, until the spontaneous recovery of a normalized TOF ratio of 0.9 on the TWSX side and even further. Both tetanic stimulations (same order as previously) were applied alternately with 2-minute intervals on several steps of recovery and until recovering 90% of the initial TFR with both stimulation patterns.
Data collection and statistical analysis On the TWSX side, the TOF ratio provided after each 2Hz TOF stimulation was displayed and recorded. We calculated 90% of the initial baseline mean value to determine the normalised TOF ratio 0.9 recovery threshold using the following formula: normalised TOF ratio 0.9 = sum of 4 TOF ratio × 9/40, with the result rounded up.
On the ITF side, a Tetanic Fade Ratio (TFR) was determined to quantify any fade occurring during the muscle contraction: referring to the resting level just before the contraction, the residual force at the end of 5 seconds of stimulation was divided by the maximal force obtained during the contraction to provide a ratio.
Based on a previous pilot study using the same material and the same stimulating patterns, a sample of 20 patients was determined to provide a significant difference between the TFRs recorded with 100 and 200 Hz tetanic stimulations at the time of AMG TOF ratio 0.9 recovery. We expected to have enough power (0.8 at that stage) to detect a significant difference during an additional period of recovery. The alpha error was 0.05.
Off-line data analysis was based on the archived files. Using R software version 3.3.6 (R Project for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria), Student's t-tests were performed to compare the TFR obtained after 100- or 200-Hz stimulations at initial baseline and at several classical levels of spontaneous recovery on the TWSX side:
- TOF count 1,
- TOF ratio 0.5,
- TOF ratio 0.9
- Normalized TOF ratio 0.9
- TOF ratio 0.95
- TOF ratio 1.0 Then, both tetanic stimulations were repeated every 5 minutes until TFR reached 0.9 to quantify any further period of analysis of low levels of residual blockade.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
- Model description
- Controlateral and simultaneous comparison of two different neuromuscular transmission monitorings in a cohort of 20 anesthetised patients.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Controlateral and simultaneous comparison of neuromuscular transmission monitors | Other | Device: Isometric Thumb Force (isometric mechanomyography) compared to TOF-Watch SX (acceleromyography)Controlateral and simultaneous comparison of responses from acceleromyography- and mechanomyography-based neuromuscular transmission monitors in the same patients. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 65 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- ASA I-II
- written informed consent
- general anesthesia for rhino(septo)plasty
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- pregnant or breastfeeding women
- patients with renal or hepatic insufficiency
- patients with neurological disorders
- patients with a suspected allergy to the drugs used in the protocol
- patients receiving medications that could interfere with neuromuscular transmission
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Isometric Thumb Force (isometric mechanomyography) compared to TOF-Watch SX (acceleromyography)Comparison of mechanomyographic measurements of thumb adduction's force induced by 100 versus 200 Hz 5 seconds tetanic ulnar nerve stimulation during neuromuscular block spontaneous recovery monitored by acceleromyography on the controlateral arm. | Device | Controlateral and simultaneous comparison of neuromuscular transmission monitors |
Primary outcome
100 vs 200 Hz Tetanic Fade Ratio comparison
Time frame: During surgery while the neuromuscular block spontaneously recovers from AMG TOF count 1 until TOF ratio 1.0
To compare 100 and 200 Hz TFR at different literature based spontaneous recovery levels recorded by acceleromyography on the other arm: TOF count 1, TOF ratio 0.5 and TOF ratio 0.9 / normalized 0.9 / 0.95 / 1.0.
1 secondary outcome
Quantification of any remaining MMG fade with 200 Hz stimulation after AMG TOF ratio 0.9 recovery
Time frame: During surgery while the neuromuscular block spontaneously recovers from AMG TOF ratio 0.9 until MMG 200 Hz TFR > 0.9
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 27 Mar 2023.
- Background: PubMed 5488360Ali HH, Utting JE, Gray C. Stimulus frequency in the detection of neuromuscular block in humans. Br J Anaesth. 1970 Nov;42(11):967-78. doi: 10.1093/bja/42.11.967. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 4305092Gissen AJ, Katz RL. Twitch, tetanus and posttetanic potentiation as indices of nerve-muscle block in man. Anesthesiology. 1969 May;30(5):481-7. doi: 10.1097/00000542-196905000-00001. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 4329144Waud BE, Waud DR. The relation between tetanic fade and receptor occlusion in the presence of competitive neuromuscular block. Anesthesiology. 1971 Nov;35(5):456-64. doi: 10.1097/00000542-197111000-00003. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 17635389Fuchs-Buder T, Claudius C, Skovgaard LT, Eriksson LI, Mirakhur RK, Viby-Mogensen J; 8th International Neuromuscular Meeting. Good clinical research practice in pharmacodynamic studies of neuromuscular blocking agents II: the Stockholm revision. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2007 Aug;51(7):789-808. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2007.01352.x.
- Background: PubMed 6452074Ali HH, Savarese JJ, Lebowitz PW, Ramsey FM. Twitch, tetanus and train-of-four as indices of recovery from nondepolarizing neuromuscular blockade. Anesthesiology. 1981 Apr;54(4):294-7. doi: 10.1097/00000542-198104000-00007.
- Background: PubMed 204226Stanec A, Heyduk J, Stanec G, Orkin LR. Tetanic fade and post-tetanic tension in the absence of neuromuscular blocking agents in anesthetized man. Anesth Analg. 1978 Jan-Feb;57(1):102-7. doi: 10.1213/00000539-197801000-00019.
- Background: PubMed 7199868Kopman AF, Epstein RH, Flashburg MH. Use of 100-Hertz tetanus as an index of recovery from pancuronium-induced non-depolarizing neuromuscular blockade. Anesth Analg. 1982 May;61(5):439-41.
- Background: PubMed 17023729Eikermann M, Vogt FM, Herbstreit F, Vahid-Dastgerdi M, Zenge MO, Ochterbeck C, de Greiff A, Peters J. The predisposition to inspiratory upper airway collapse during partial neuromuscular blockade. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2007 Jan 1;175(1):9-15. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200512-1862OC. Epub 2006 Oct 5.
- Background: PubMed 20234315Plaud B, Debaene B, Donati F, Marty J. Residual paralysis after emergence from anesthesia. Anesthesiology. 2010 Apr;112(4):1013-22. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181cded07. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 30224322Kirmeier E, Eriksson LI, Lewald H, Jonsson Fagerlund M, Hoeft A, Hollmann M, Meistelman C, Hunter JM, Ulm K, Blobner M; POPULAR Contributors. Post-anaesthesia pulmonary complications after use of muscle relaxants (POPULAR): a multicentre, prospective observational study. Lancet Respir Med. 2019 Feb;7(2):129-140. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(18)30294-7. Epub 2018 Sep 14.
- Background: PubMed 31607388Blobner M, Hunter JM, Meistelman C, Hoeft A, Hollmann MW, Kirmeier E, Lewald H, Ulm K. Use of a train-of-four ratio of 0.95 versus 0.9 for tracheal extubation: an exploratory analysis of POPULAR data. Br J Anaesth. 2020 Jan;124(1):63-72. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2019.08.023. Epub 2019 Oct 10.
- Background: PubMed 15114208Capron F, Alla F, Hottier C, Meistelman C, Fuchs-Buder T. Can acceleromyography detect low levels of residual paralysis? A probability approach to detect a mechanomyographic train-of-four ratio of 0.9. Anesthesiology. 2004 May;100(5):1119-24. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200405000-00013.
Related trials for Neuromuscular Blockade
Active, not recruiting
Efficacy of Laparoscopic-Assisted TAP Block in Laparoscopic Appendectomy
Appendectomy, Laparoscopic, Blockades Neuromuscular
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Diaphragm Ultrasound and Neuromuscular Monitoring for Predicting Early Respiratory Events After Extubation
Residual Neuromuscular Blockade, Diaphragm Dysfunction
Recruiting
Inspiratory Muscle Training and Diaphragmatic Breathing in GAD
Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD)
Not yet recruiting
Comparative Effects Of Exercises Targeting Upper Trapezius In Patients With Non Specific Neck Pain
Non Specific Neck Pain
RecruitingObservational study
The Association Between Residual Neuromuscular Block Risk Prediction Score and the Train-of-Four Ratio
Muscle Relaxants
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Alain D'Hollander, Prof study chair
Fondation pour l'Anesthésie-Réanimation, Vaduz
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Isometric Thumb Force (isometric mechanomyography) compared to TOF-Watch SX (acceleromyography) in people with Neuromuscular Blockade, run by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire UCLouvain Namur at 1 site in Belgium.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Mar 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Belgium. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
100 vs 200 Hz Tetanic Fade Ratio comparison (time frame: During surgery while the neuromuscular block spontaneously recovers from AMG TOF count 1 until TOF ratio 1.0). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05474638, which also lists 16 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Mar 2023.