Knee DiseaseNCT05448742
Biplanar PSI Slope-reducing MOWHTO With Tibial Tuberosity Serving as Hinge Axis: Cadaveric Study
A study testing Biplanar PSI slope-reducing MOWHTO. in people with Knee Disease and Knee Osteoarthritis, run by Artromedical Konrad Malinowski Clinic at 1 site in Poland.
Trial summary
Six cadaveric lower limbs will have PSI slope-reducing MOWHTO performed on and accuraccy of biplanar correction will be assessed. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Any age
- Conditions the study is for
- Knee Disease, Knee Osteoarthritis, Knee Injuries and Disorders
- What is being tested?
- Biplanar PSI slope-reducing MOWHTO.
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 6 participants
- Where
- 1 sitePoland
- Study dates
- 22 Jun 2022to 31 Dec 2022
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Any age
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Six fresh-frozen cadaveric lower limbs with 2/3 distal of femoral shaft and full-length leg with ankle and feet will be included in the study
Who cannot join
- There will be no exclusion criteria for cadaveric lower limbs.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Novel, Biplanar, Medial Opening Wedge, Posterior Tibial Slope-reducing High Tibial Osteotomy Aided by Patient-specific Instruments, With Tibial Tuberosity Serving as Hinge Axis: Cadaveric Study Assessing Accuracy of Biplanar Correction With Various Coronal and Sagittal Amounts of Correction
Six cadaveric lower limbs will have PSI slope-reducing MOWHTO performed on and accuraccy of biplanar correction will be assessed.
Read the detailed description
Introduction:
High tibial osteotomy (HTO) is a widely performed procedure in case of varus knee with medial compartment osteoarthritis (OA), with medial-opening wedge version performed more often than lateral-closing wedge one. While in most cases the goal of medial-opening wedge HTO (MOWHTO) is isolated correction of coronal limb alignment, unintentional increase of posterior tibial slope (PTS) after MOWHTO can occur, however its extent is usually limited. Meta-analysis by Nha et al. published in 2016 and summarizing 27 studies including 1260 MOWHTO procedures, reported mean increase of PTS by 2.02° (95% CI, 2.66° to 1.38°; P = .005). One of factors limiting the extent of PTS change both in above described unintentional circumstances and in desired biplanar corrections, can be the fact that in most cases lateral cortex of the tibia is not transected. Therefore, increase of PTS after MOWHTO was proposed to be caused by the unique anatomical characteristics of the proximal tibia such as non-perpendicular angle between anteromedial and lateral cortex. However, this phenomenon has its limitations and in cases when greater correction of PTS is required, transection of lateral tibial cortex may be necessary, as is routinely performed in osteotomies targeted at isolated PTS correction. In such cases, posterior cortex is remained intact to serve as hinge axis.
On the other hand, in some cases significant biplanar correction of both coronal and sagittal knee alignment is desired. However, transecting all three tibial cortexes increases technical difficulty of the procedure and may increase time to union and the risk of non-union. Therefore, optimal placement of hinge axis to achieve higher accuracy of desired biplanar correction is intensively studied and discussed. In general, anterolateral placement of hinge axis is established to be necessary in order to achieve both valgus correction and PTS decrease. Such biplanar correction may be desired i.e. in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) revision cases with varus alignment, especially in cases with associated posterolateral corner (PLC) injury, as varus alignment was shown to increase stress both in ACL and PLC grafts. What is more, Won et al. have shown that as much as 19% of ACL revision cases presented with radiographic OA of Kellgren-Lawrence 2 or higher at the medial tibiofemoral joint, highlighting the potential indication for biplanar MOWHTO. Another issue faced during MOWHTO is its influence on patellar height. Multiple studies suggested the possibility of iatrogenic lowering of the patella or the patella baja after MOWHTO. However, as early as in 1979 Goutallier et al. reported that more anterior placement of hinge axis may diminish the impact of HTO on patellar height, which remains in agreement with the proposed anterolateral placement of hinge axis. Up to date, most of the studies assessing impact of hinge axis localization on biplanar correction are based on 3D models and simulations instead of cadavers of real-life procedures, with inherent limitations of that. What is more, accurate and reproducible placement of hinge axis remains technically challenging. One of the ideas developed to improve accuracy of hinge axis placement and accuracy of biplanar correction are Patient-Specific Instruments (PSI), with good results reported by multiple authors.
Therefore, the aim of this cadaveric study was to assess accuracy of biplanar correction with precisely planned increasing various coronal and sagittal amounts of correction utilizing novel, biplanar, medial-opening wedge, posterior tibial slope-reducing high tibial osteotomy aided by PSI, with tibial tuberosity serving as hinge axis. The primary hypothesis of this study was that: 1) There will be no significant differences between planned and achieved biplanar corrections neither in coronal nor sagittal planes. Secondary hypotheses were as follows: 2) Arhtrex PEEKPower HTO plates a) provide good intraoperative stabilization, b) regardless of the change of plate location there will be enough space to preserve soft tissues and no need for new plate design. c) Material used for plates construction will allow for precise evaluation in Computed tomography (CT); 3) No intraoperative fractures will occur; 4) No significant change of patellar height will occur.
Material and Methods:
Preoperative measurements:
Six fresh-frozen cadaveric lower limbs with 2/3 distal of femoral shaft and full-length leg with ankle and feet will be included in the study. CT scans encompassing full cadaveric specimen will be performed in full extension of the knee, or in maximal extension possible in given limb. Both coronal and sagittal anatomical axis will be assessed on CT scan. Femoral anatomical axis will be defined as a line connecting center of the marrow cavity at the most proximal level of femoral shaft available and the center of the knee at the level of the line tangent to the distal ends of femoral condyles. Tibial anatomical axis will be defined as a line connecting the center of the tibial articular surface in the knee and the center of the talus, similarly to the methodology of Wu Chi-Chuan. Medial proximal tibia angle (MPTA) will be defined as the angle between tibial anatomical axis and the medial tibial plateau joint line. Anatomical femorotibial angle (aFTA) will be defined as the angle between tibial anatomical axis and femoral anatomical axis. PTS will be assessed on CT scans using the methodology provided by Meier et al. and Calek et al. Due to the fact that mean intraindividual difference between PTS measured on medial tibial condyle (medial tibial posterior slope, MTPS) and lateral tibial condyle (lateral tibial posterior slope, LTPS) was reported to differ as much as 2.9 ° (range 0.0°-10.8°) or 2.6° (range 0.0°-9.5°), MTPS and LTPS will be measured separately. They will be defined as an angles between the plane perpendicular to the mechanical axis of the tibia (established using the ankle center and tibial spine) and the line tangent to the most prominent aspects of the anterior and posterior cortices of the medial and lateral compartments, respectively.
Patellar height will be assessed utilizing Insall-Salvati Index (ISI), Blackburne-Peel Index (BPI) and Caton-Deschamps Index (CDI). Two independent observers will perform the measurements separately, each of them will perform the measurements two times. Intra- and inter-reliabilities will be calculated.
CT scans will be performed on Siemens Somatom Go Top tomograph with 140kV voltage, slice thickness 0,6mm, increment 0,4mm. Two scans will be performed during each time, with tin filter and without it. Images of better quality will be chosen for measurements Surgical procedure: All specimens will undergo novel, biplanar, medial-opening wedge, posterior tibial slope-reducing high tibial osteotomy aided by PSI, with tibial tuberosity serving as hinge axis. The following corrections will be performed: group A, 3 specimens, in all cases PTS decrease by 6° and valgus correction of anatomical axis by 6°, 9° and 12°; and group B, 3 specimens, in all cases PTS decrease by 10° and valgus correction of anatomical axis by 6°, 9° and 12°. Randomization of specimens will be performed, irrespective of their native alignment, as the primary aim of this study is to assess the accuracy of planned biplanar correction. PSI will be created for every specimen by the engineer with years of practice in designing orthopaedic PSI (author J.P.). The following computer programs will be used: for creating 3D models out of DICOM files - 3D Slicer 4.11.20210226 (Brigham and Women's Hospital (BWH) \& 3D Slicer contributors, 2021); for designing 3D PSI surgical guides -SolidWorks 2016 (Dassault Systèmes SolidWorks Corporation, 2016). After completion of the design, PSI surgical guides will be 3D printed in two versions: trial, not destined for medical usage - with the 3D printer Stratasys Dimension 1200es (Stratasys Ltd), from material ABS (HMF Chemical); final, destined for medical usage - with the 3D printer EOS Formiga P110 (EOS GmbH), from material PA2200 Balance 1.0 (EOS GmbH). Obtained 3D PSI surgical guides are compliant with the requirements set out in Directive 93/42/EEC concerning medical devices as well as PN-EN ISO 15223-1, EN 1041 +A1:2013, EN ISO 14971, PN-EN ISO 17664:2005 (EN ISO 17664:2004) and PN-EN ISO 10993-1:2010 (EN ISO 10993-1:2009+AC:2010).
Postoperative measurements: MPTS, LPTS, coronal alignment and patellar height will be measured postoperatively utilizing the same methodology as described preoperatively. CT scans will be performed in the same angle of knee extension as preoperatively. Postoperative CT scans will be also assessed for the presence of fractures, in accordance with higher detection rate than when utilizing plain X-ray, as reported by Sang-June Lee. Once again, two observers will perform the measurements/ assessments separately, each of them will perform the measurements two times and they will be blinded as to desired amount of correction in the given extremity. Intra- and inter-reliabilities will be calculated. Statistical analysis will be performed in Statistica 13.3 software (StatSoft/ TIBCO Software Inc, 2017).
- Being tested
- Biplanar PSI slope-reducing MOWHTO.
- Medical subject headings
- Osteoarthritis, Knee, Knee Injuries, Disease
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Biplanar PSI slope-reducing MOWHTO.Device
High tibial osteotomy (HTO) is a widely performed procedure in case of varus knee with medial compartment osteoarthritis (OA), with medial-opening wedge version performed more often than lateral-closing wedge one. While in most cases the goal of medial-opening wedge HTO (MOWHTO) is isolated correction of coronal limb alignment, intentional or unintentional increase of posterior tibial slope (PTS) after MOWHTO can occur, however its extent is usually limited and depends on accurate hinge axis placement. One of the ideas developed to improve accuracy of hinge axis placement and accuracy of biplanar correction are Patient-Specific Instruments (PSI). Our intervention is novel, biplanar, medial-opening wedge, posterior tibial slope-reducing high tibial osteotomy aided by PSI, with tibial tuberosity serving as hinge axis.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Main arm of the study | Experimental | Six cadaveric lower limbs will have biplanar PSI slope-reducing MOWHTO performed on and accuracy of biplanar correction will be assessed. Receives: Device: Biplanar PSI slope-reducing MOWHTO. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Feasibility of the 3D PSI device to achieve desired Medial Proximal Tibial Angle
Feasibility of the 3D PSI device to achieve desired Medial Proximal Tibial Angle - measurement of preop, postop and amount of desired and performed correction on cadavers (not clinical data, measurement on cadavers)
Measured: Procedures will be perfomred on cadaveric limbs on 22th June 2022 and analyzed within 6 weeks
Feasibility of the 3D PSI device to achieve desired Medial Proximal Tibial Slope
Feasibility of the 3D PSI device to achieve desired Medial Proximal Tibial Slope - measurement of preop, postop and amount of desired and performed correction on cadavers (not clinical data, measurement on cadavers)
Measured: Procedures will be perfomred on cadaveric limbs on 22th June 2022 and analyzed within 6 weeks
Feasibility of the 3D PSI device to achieve desired Lateral Proximal Tibial Slope
Feasibility of the 3D PSI device to achieve desired Lateral Proximal Tibial Slope - measurement of preop, postop and amount of desired and performed correction on cadavers (not clinical data, measurement on cadavers)
Measured: Procedures will be perfomred on cadaveric limbs on 22th June 2022 and analyzed within 6 weeks
Feasibility of the 3D PSI device to achieve desired anatomical FemoroTibial Angle
Feasibility of the 3D PSI device to achieve desired anatomical FemoroTibial Angle - measurement of preop, postop and amount of desired and performed correction on cadavers (not clinical data, measurement on cadavers)
Measured: Procedures will be perfomred on cadaveric limbs on 22th June 2022 and analyzed within 6 weeks
Secondary outcomes (4)
Feasibility of the 3D PSI device to avoid change of anatomical Insall-Salvati Index
Feasibility of the 3D PSI device to avoid change of anatomical Insall-Salvati Index - measurement of preop and postop on cadavers (not clinical data, measurement on cadavers).
This is a scale describing patellar height with no minimal and maximal values; higher values mean higher height of patella and lower values mean lower height of patella, however it can not be simply associated with better or worse outcome.
Measured: Procedures will be perfomred on cadaveric limbs on 22th June 2022 and analyzed within 6 weeks
Feasibility of the 3D PSI device to avoid change of anatomical Blackburn-Peel Index
Feasibility of the 3D PSI device to avoid change of anatomical Blackburn-Peel Index - measurement of preop and postop on cadavers (not clinical data, measurement on cadavers)
This is a scale describing patellar height with no minimal and maximal values; higher values mean higher height of patella and lower values mean lower height of patella, however it can not be simply associated with better or worse outcome.
Measured: Procedures will be perfomred on cadaveric limbs on 22th June 2022 and analyzed within 6 weeks
Feasibility of the 3D PSI device to avoid change of anatomical Caton-Deschamps Index
Feasibility of the 3D PSI device to avoid change of anatomical Caton-Deschamps Index - measurement of preop and postop on cadavers (not clinical data, measurement on cadavers).
This is a scale describing patellar height with no minimal and maximal values; higher values mean higher height of patella and lower values mean lower height of patella, however it can not be simply associated with better or worse outcome.
Measured: Procedures will be perfomred on cadaveric limbs on 22th June 2022 and analyzed within 6 weeks
Feasibility of the 3D PSI device to avoid intraoperative fractures
Feasibility of the 3D PSI device to avoid intraoperative fractures - presence of intraoperative fractures will be assessed on CT scans (not clinical data, assessment on cadavers)
Measured: Procedures will be perfomred on cadaveric limbs on 22th June 2022 and analyzed within 6 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted7 Jul 2022
- Study start22 Jun 2022
- Primary completion31 Dec 2022 (estimated)
- Study completion31 Dec 2022 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (28)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Knee DiseaseStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Device feasibility
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Model description
- Six cadaveric lower limbs will have biplanar PSI slope-reducing MOWHTO performed on and accuracy of biplanar correction will be assessed.
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 6 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Artromedical Konrad Malinowski Clinic
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Konrad Malinowski MD, Artromedical Konrad Malinowski Clinic
- Investigators
- Konrad Malinowski, MD PhD, Principal investigator, Artromedical Orthopaedic Clinic, Bełchatów, Poland
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05448742
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 1-pro-ar-2022
- Status last verified
- Jul 2022
- First submitted
- 18 May 2022
- Last updated
- 13 Jul 2022
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Bin SI, Kim HJ, Ahn HS, Rim DS, Lee DH. Changes in Patellar Height After Opening Wedge and Closing Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy: A Meta-analysis. Arthroscopy. 2016 Nov;32(11):2393-2400. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2016.06.012. Epub 2016 Aug 25.
PubMed 27570171Calek AK, Hochreiter B, Hess S, Amsler F, Leclerq V, Hirschmann MT, Behrend H. High inter- and intraindividual differences in medial and lateral posterior tibial slope are not reproduced accurately by conventional TKA alignment techniques. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2022 Mar;30(3):882-889. doi: 10.1007/s00167-021-06477-z. Epub 2021 Feb 6.
PubMed 33547913Dejour D, Saffarini M, Demey G, Baverel L. Tibial slope correction combined with second revision ACL produces good knee stability and prevents graft rupture. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2015 Oct;23(10):2846-52. doi: 10.1007/s00167-015-3758-6. Epub 2015 Aug 23.
PubMed 26298711Dexel J, Fritzsche H, Beyer F, Harman MK, Lutzner J. Open-wedge high tibial osteotomy: incidence of lateral cortex fractures and influence of fixation device on osteotomy healing. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017 Mar;25(3):832-837. doi: 10.1007/s00167-015-3730-5. Epub 2015 Aug 8.
PubMed 26254088Donnez M, Ollivier M, Munier M, Berton P, Podgorski JP, Chabrand P, Parratte S. Are three-dimensional patient-specific cutting guides for open wedge high tibial osteotomy accurate? An in vitro study. J Orthop Surg Res. 2018 Jul 9;13(1):171. doi: 10.1186/s13018-018-0872-4.
PubMed 29986731Eliasberg CD, Hancock KJ, Swartwout E, Robichaud H, Ranawat AS. The Ideal Hinge Axis Position to Reduce Tibial Slope in Opening-Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy Includes Proximalization-Extension and Internal Rotation. Arthroscopy. 2021 May;37(5):1577-1584. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2020.12.203. Epub 2020 Dec 24.
PubMed 33359158Gooi SG, Chan CXY, Tan MKL, Lim AKS, Satkunanantham K, Hui JHP. Patella Height Changes Post High Tibial Osteotomy. Indian J Orthop. 2017 Sep-Oct;51(5):545-551. doi: 10.4103/ortho.IJOrtho_214_17.
PubMed 28966378Goutallier D, Delepine G, Debeyre J. [The patello-femoral joint in osteoarthritis of the knee with genu varum (author's transl)]. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 1979 Jan-Feb;65(1):25-31. French.
PubMed 156384Hankemeier S, Hufner T, Wang G, Kendoff D, Zeichen J, Zheng G, Krettek C. Navigated open-wedge high tibial osteotomy: advantages and disadvantages compared to the conventional technique in a cadaver study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2006 Oct;14(10):917-21. doi: 10.1007/s00167-006-0035-8. Epub 2006 Feb 24.
PubMed 16501952Kesmezacar H, Erginer R, Ogut T, Seyahi A, Babacan M, Tenekecioglu Y. Evaluation of patellar height and measurement methods after valgus high tibial osteotomy. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2005 Oct;13(7):539-44. doi: 10.1007/s00167-004-0572-y. Epub 2005 Jan 8.
PubMed 15645214Kim HJ, Park J, Park KH, Park IH, Jang JA, Shin JY, Kyung HS. Evaluation of Accuracy of a Three-Dimensional Printed Model in Open-Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy. J Knee Surg. 2019 Sep;32(9):841-846. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1669901. Epub 2018 Sep 6.
PubMed 30189435Klek M, Dhawan A. The Role of High Tibial Osteotomy in ACL Reconstruction in Knees with Coronal and Sagittal Plane Deformity. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2019 Dec;12(4):466-471. doi: 10.1007/s12178-019-09589-9.
PubMed 31760623Kwun JD, Kim HJ, Park J, Park IH, Kyung HS. Open wedge high tibial osteotomy using three-dimensional printed models: Experimental analysis using porcine bone. Knee. 2017 Jan;24(1):16-22. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2016.09.026. Epub 2016 Nov 19.
PubMed 27876267Lee BH, Ha CW, Moon SW, Chang M, Kim HY, Park SH, Wang JH. Three-dimensional relationships between secondary changes and selective osteotomy parameters for biplane medial open-wedge high tibial osteotomy. Knee. 2017 Mar;24(2):362-371. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2016.11.010. Epub 2017 Feb 4.
PubMed 28169100Lee SJ, Kim JH, Baek E, Ryu HS, Han D, Choi W. Incidence and Factors Affecting the Occurrence of Lateral Hinge Fracture After Medial Opening-Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy. Orthop J Sports Med. 2021 Oct 8;9(10):23259671211035372. doi: 10.1177/23259671211035372. eCollection 2021 Oct.
PubMed 34646897
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 13 Jul 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Novel, Biplanar, Medial Opening Wedge, Posterior Tibial Slope-reducing High Tibial Osteotomy Aided by Patient-specific Instruments, With Tibial Tuberosity Serving as Hinge Axis: Cadaveric Study Assessing Accuracy of Biplanar Correction With Various Coronal and Sagittal Amounts of Correction
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05448742
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 1-pro-ar-2022
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 6 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Artromedical Konrad Malinowski ClinicUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 22 Jun 2022 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Dec 2022 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 31 Dec 2022 (estimated)
- First posted
- 7 Jul 2022 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Six cadaveric lower limbs will have PSI slope-reducing MOWHTO performed on and accuraccy of biplanar correction will be assessed.
Detailed description
Introduction:
High tibial osteotomy (HTO) is a widely performed procedure in case of varus knee with medial compartment osteoarthritis (OA), with medial-opening wedge version performed more often than lateral-closing wedge one. While in most cases the goal of medial-opening wedge HTO (MOWHTO) is isolated correction of coronal limb alignment, unintentional increase of posterior tibial slope (PTS) after MOWHTO can occur, however its extent is usually limited. Meta-analysis by Nha et al. published in 2016 and summarizing 27 studies including 1260 MOWHTO procedures, reported mean increase of PTS by 2.02° (95% CI, 2.66° to 1.38°; P = .005). One of factors limiting the extent of PTS change both in above described unintentional circumstances and in desired biplanar corrections, can be the fact that in most cases lateral cortex of the tibia is not transected. Therefore, increase of PTS after MOWHTO was proposed to be caused by the unique anatomical characteristics of the proximal tibia such as non-perpendicular angle between anteromedial and lateral cortex. However, this phenomenon has its limitations and in cases when greater correction of PTS is required, transection of lateral tibial cortex may be necessary, as is routinely performed in osteotomies targeted at isolated PTS correction. In such cases, posterior cortex is remained intact to serve as hinge axis.
On the other hand, in some cases significant biplanar correction of both coronal and sagittal knee alignment is desired. However, transecting all three tibial cortexes increases technical difficulty of the procedure and may increase time to union and the risk of non-union. Therefore, optimal placement of hinge axis to achieve higher accuracy of desired biplanar correction is intensively studied and discussed. In general, anterolateral placement of hinge axis is established to be necessary in order to achieve both valgus correction and PTS decrease. Such biplanar correction may be desired i.e. in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) revision cases with varus alignment, especially in cases with associated posterolateral corner (PLC) injury, as varus alignment was shown to increase stress both in ACL and PLC grafts. What is more, Won et al. have shown that as much as 19% of ACL revision cases presented with radiographic OA of Kellgren-Lawrence 2 or higher at the medial tibiofemoral joint, highlighting the potential indication for biplanar MOWHTO. Another issue faced during MOWHTO is its influence on patellar height. Multiple studies suggested the possibility of iatrogenic lowering of the patella or the patella baja after MOWHTO. However, as early as in 1979 Goutallier et al. reported that more anterior placement of hinge axis may diminish the impact of HTO on patellar height, which remains in agreement with the proposed anterolateral placement of hinge axis. Up to date, most of the studies assessing impact of hinge axis localization on biplanar correction are based on 3D models and simulations instead of cadavers of real-life procedures, with inherent limitations of that. What is more, accurate and reproducible placement of hinge axis remains technically challenging. One of the ideas developed to improve accuracy of hinge axis placement and accuracy of biplanar correction are Patient-Specific Instruments (PSI), with good results reported by multiple authors.
Therefore, the aim of this cadaveric study was to assess accuracy of biplanar correction with precisely planned increasing various coronal and sagittal amounts of correction utilizing novel, biplanar, medial-opening wedge, posterior tibial slope-reducing high tibial osteotomy aided by PSI, with tibial tuberosity serving as hinge axis. The primary hypothesis of this study was that: 1) There will be no significant differences between planned and achieved biplanar corrections neither in coronal nor sagittal planes. Secondary hypotheses were as follows: 2) Arhtrex PEEKPower HTO plates a) provide good intraoperative stabilization, b) regardless of the change of plate location there will be enough space to preserve soft tissues and no need for new plate design. c) Material used for plates construction will allow for precise evaluation in Computed tomography (CT); 3) No intraoperative fractures will occur; 4) No significant change of patellar height will occur.
Material and Methods:
Preoperative measurements:
Six fresh-frozen cadaveric lower limbs with 2/3 distal of femoral shaft and full-length leg with ankle and feet will be included in the study. CT scans encompassing full cadaveric specimen will be performed in full extension of the knee, or in maximal extension possible in given limb. Both coronal and sagittal anatomical axis will be assessed on CT scan. Femoral anatomical axis will be defined as a line connecting center of the marrow cavity at the most proximal level of femoral shaft available and the center of the knee at the level of the line tangent to the distal ends of femoral condyles. Tibial anatomical axis will be defined as a line connecting the center of the tibial articular surface in the knee and the center of the talus, similarly to the methodology of Wu Chi-Chuan. Medial proximal tibia angle (MPTA) will be defined as the angle between tibial anatomical axis and the medial tibial plateau joint line. Anatomical femorotibial angle (aFTA) will be defined as the angle between tibial anatomical axis and femoral anatomical axis. PTS will be assessed on CT scans using the methodology provided by Meier et al. and Calek et al. Due to the fact that mean intraindividual difference between PTS measured on medial tibial condyle (medial tibial posterior slope, MTPS) and lateral tibial condyle (lateral tibial posterior slope, LTPS) was reported to differ as much as 2.9 ° (range 0.0°-10.8°) or 2.6° (range 0.0°-9.5°), MTPS and LTPS will be measured separately. They will be defined as an angles between the plane perpendicular to the mechanical axis of the tibia (established using the ankle center and tibial spine) and the line tangent to the most prominent aspects of the anterior and posterior cortices of the medial and lateral compartments, respectively.
Patellar height will be assessed utilizing Insall-Salvati Index (ISI), Blackburne-Peel Index (BPI) and Caton-Deschamps Index (CDI). Two independent observers will perform the measurements separately, each of them will perform the measurements two times. Intra- and inter-reliabilities will be calculated.
CT scans will be performed on Siemens Somatom Go Top tomograph with 140kV voltage, slice thickness 0,6mm, increment 0,4mm. Two scans will be performed during each time, with tin filter and without it. Images of better quality will be chosen for measurements Surgical procedure: All specimens will undergo novel, biplanar, medial-opening wedge, posterior tibial slope-reducing high tibial osteotomy aided by PSI, with tibial tuberosity serving as hinge axis. The following corrections will be performed: group A, 3 specimens, in all cases PTS decrease by 6° and valgus correction of anatomical axis by 6°, 9° and 12°; and group B, 3 specimens, in all cases PTS decrease by 10° and valgus correction of anatomical axis by 6°, 9° and 12°. Randomization of specimens will be performed, irrespective of their native alignment, as the primary aim of this study is to assess the accuracy of planned biplanar correction. PSI will be created for every specimen by the engineer with years of practice in designing orthopaedic PSI (author J.P.). The following computer programs will be used: for creating 3D models out of DICOM files - 3D Slicer 4.11.20210226 (Brigham and Women's Hospital (BWH) \& 3D Slicer contributors, 2021); for designing 3D PSI surgical guides -SolidWorks 2016 (Dassault Systèmes SolidWorks Corporation, 2016). After completion of the design, PSI surgical guides will be 3D printed in two versions: trial, not destined for medical usage - with the 3D printer Stratasys Dimension 1200es (Stratasys Ltd), from material ABS (HMF Chemical); final, destined for medical usage - with the 3D printer EOS Formiga P110 (EOS GmbH), from material PA2200 Balance 1.0 (EOS GmbH). Obtained 3D PSI surgical guides are compliant with the requirements set out in Directive 93/42/EEC concerning medical devices as well as PN-EN ISO 15223-1, EN 1041 +A1:2013, EN ISO 14971, PN-EN ISO 17664:2005 (EN ISO 17664:2004) and PN-EN ISO 10993-1:2010 (EN ISO 10993-1:2009+AC:2010).
Postoperative measurements: MPTS, LPTS, coronal alignment and patellar height will be measured postoperatively utilizing the same methodology as described preoperatively. CT scans will be performed in the same angle of knee extension as preoperatively. Postoperative CT scans will be also assessed for the presence of fractures, in accordance with higher detection rate than when utilizing plain X-ray, as reported by Sang-June Lee. Once again, two observers will perform the measurements/ assessments separately, each of them will perform the measurements two times and they will be blinded as to desired amount of correction in the given extremity. Intra- and inter-reliabilities will be calculated. Statistical analysis will be performed in Statistica 13.3 software (StatSoft/ TIBCO Software Inc, 2017).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Device feasibility
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
- Model description
- Six cadaveric lower limbs will have biplanar PSI slope-reducing MOWHTO performed on and accuracy of biplanar correction will be assessed.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Main arm of the study | Experimental | Device: Biplanar PSI slope-reducing MOWHTO.Six cadaveric lower limbs will have biplanar PSI slope-reducing MOWHTO performed on and accuracy of biplanar correction will be assessed. |
Who may qualify
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Six fresh-frozen cadaveric lower limbs with 2/3 distal of femoral shaft and full-length leg with ankle and feet will be included in the study
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- There will be no exclusion criteria for cadaveric lower limbs.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Biplanar PSI slope-reducing MOWHTO.High tibial osteotomy (HTO) is a widely performed procedure in case of varus knee with medial compartment osteoarthritis (OA), with medial-opening wedge version performed more often than lateral-closing wedge one. While in most cases the goal of medial-opening wedge HTO (MOWHTO) is isolated correction of coronal limb alignment, intentional or unintentional increase of posterior tibial slope (PTS) after MOWHTO can occur, however its extent is usually limited and depends on accurate hinge axis placement. One of the ideas developed to improve accuracy of hinge axis placement and accuracy of biplanar correction are Patient-Specific Instruments (PSI). Our intervention is novel, biplanar, medial-opening wedge, posterior tibial slope-reducing high tibial osteotomy aided by PSI, with tibial tuberosity serving as hinge axis. | Device | Main arm of the study |
Primary outcome
Feasibility of the 3D PSI device to achieve desired Medial Proximal Tibial Angle
Time frame: Procedures will be perfomred on cadaveric limbs on 22th June 2022 and analyzed within 6 weeks
Feasibility of the 3D PSI device to achieve desired Medial Proximal Tibial Angle - measurement of preop, postop and amount of desired and performed correction on cadavers (not clinical data, measurement on cadavers)
Feasibility of the 3D PSI device to achieve desired Medial Proximal Tibial Slope
Time frame: Procedures will be perfomred on cadaveric limbs on 22th June 2022 and analyzed within 6 weeks
Feasibility of the 3D PSI device to achieve desired Medial Proximal Tibial Slope - measurement of preop, postop and amount of desired and performed correction on cadavers (not clinical data, measurement on cadavers)
Feasibility of the 3D PSI device to achieve desired Lateral Proximal Tibial Slope
Time frame: Procedures will be perfomred on cadaveric limbs on 22th June 2022 and analyzed within 6 weeks
Feasibility of the 3D PSI device to achieve desired Lateral Proximal Tibial Slope - measurement of preop, postop and amount of desired and performed correction on cadavers (not clinical data, measurement on cadavers)
Feasibility of the 3D PSI device to achieve desired anatomical FemoroTibial Angle
Time frame: Procedures will be perfomred on cadaveric limbs on 22th June 2022 and analyzed within 6 weeks
Feasibility of the 3D PSI device to achieve desired anatomical FemoroTibial Angle - measurement of preop, postop and amount of desired and performed correction on cadavers (not clinical data, measurement on cadavers)
4 secondary outcomes
Feasibility of the 3D PSI device to avoid change of anatomical Insall-Salvati Index
Time frame: Procedures will be perfomred on cadaveric limbs on 22th June 2022 and analyzed within 6 weeks
Feasibility of the 3D PSI device to avoid change of anatomical Blackburn-Peel Index
Time frame: Procedures will be perfomred on cadaveric limbs on 22th June 2022 and analyzed within 6 weeks
Feasibility of the 3D PSI device to avoid change of anatomical Caton-Deschamps Index
Time frame: Procedures will be perfomred on cadaveric limbs on 22th June 2022 and analyzed within 6 weeks
Feasibility of the 3D PSI device to avoid intraoperative fractures
Time frame: Procedures will be perfomred on cadaveric limbs on 22th June 2022 and analyzed within 6 weeks
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 13 Jul 2022.
- Background: PubMed 27570171Bin SI, Kim HJ, Ahn HS, Rim DS, Lee DH. Changes in Patellar Height After Opening Wedge and Closing Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy: A Meta-analysis. Arthroscopy. 2016 Nov;32(11):2393-2400. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2016.06.012. Epub 2016 Aug 25.
- Background: PubMed 33547913Calek AK, Hochreiter B, Hess S, Amsler F, Leclerq V, Hirschmann MT, Behrend H. High inter- and intraindividual differences in medial and lateral posterior tibial slope are not reproduced accurately by conventional TKA alignment techniques. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2022 Mar;30(3):882-889. doi: 10.1007/s00167-021-06477-z. Epub 2021 Feb 6.
- Background: PubMed 26298711Dejour D, Saffarini M, Demey G, Baverel L. Tibial slope correction combined with second revision ACL produces good knee stability and prevents graft rupture. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2015 Oct;23(10):2846-52. doi: 10.1007/s00167-015-3758-6. Epub 2015 Aug 23.
- Background: PubMed 26254088Dexel J, Fritzsche H, Beyer F, Harman MK, Lutzner J. Open-wedge high tibial osteotomy: incidence of lateral cortex fractures and influence of fixation device on osteotomy healing. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017 Mar;25(3):832-837. doi: 10.1007/s00167-015-3730-5. Epub 2015 Aug 8.
- Background: PubMed 29986731Donnez M, Ollivier M, Munier M, Berton P, Podgorski JP, Chabrand P, Parratte S. Are three-dimensional patient-specific cutting guides for open wedge high tibial osteotomy accurate? An in vitro study. J Orthop Surg Res. 2018 Jul 9;13(1):171. doi: 10.1186/s13018-018-0872-4.
- Background: PubMed 33359158Eliasberg CD, Hancock KJ, Swartwout E, Robichaud H, Ranawat AS. The Ideal Hinge Axis Position to Reduce Tibial Slope in Opening-Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy Includes Proximalization-Extension and Internal Rotation. Arthroscopy. 2021 May;37(5):1577-1584. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2020.12.203. Epub 2020 Dec 24.
- Background: PubMed 28966378Gooi SG, Chan CXY, Tan MKL, Lim AKS, Satkunanantham K, Hui JHP. Patella Height Changes Post High Tibial Osteotomy. Indian J Orthop. 2017 Sep-Oct;51(5):545-551. doi: 10.4103/ortho.IJOrtho_214_17.
- Background: PubMed 156384Goutallier D, Delepine G, Debeyre J. [The patello-femoral joint in osteoarthritis of the knee with genu varum (author's transl)]. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 1979 Jan-Feb;65(1):25-31. French.
- Background: PubMed 16501952Hankemeier S, Hufner T, Wang G, Kendoff D, Zeichen J, Zheng G, Krettek C. Navigated open-wedge high tibial osteotomy: advantages and disadvantages compared to the conventional technique in a cadaver study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2006 Oct;14(10):917-21. doi: 10.1007/s00167-006-0035-8. Epub 2006 Feb 24.
- Background: PubMed 15645214Kesmezacar H, Erginer R, Ogut T, Seyahi A, Babacan M, Tenekecioglu Y. Evaluation of patellar height and measurement methods after valgus high tibial osteotomy. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2005 Oct;13(7):539-44. doi: 10.1007/s00167-004-0572-y. Epub 2005 Jan 8.
- Background: PubMed 30189435Kim HJ, Park J, Park KH, Park IH, Jang JA, Shin JY, Kyung HS. Evaluation of Accuracy of a Three-Dimensional Printed Model in Open-Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy. J Knee Surg. 2019 Sep;32(9):841-846. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1669901. Epub 2018 Sep 6.
- Background: PubMed 31760623Klek M, Dhawan A. The Role of High Tibial Osteotomy in ACL Reconstruction in Knees with Coronal and Sagittal Plane Deformity. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2019 Dec;12(4):466-471. doi: 10.1007/s12178-019-09589-9.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Knee Disease
Not yet recruiting
Holistic Healing for Knee Osteoarthritis
Knee Osteoarthritis (Knee OA)
Recruiting
Effects of Telerehabilitation Versus Supervised Rehabilitation Protocol on Pain, Range of Motion and Functional Recovery in Patients With Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome.
Patello Femoral Pain Syndrome
RecruitingPhase 3
REGN7508 Versus Apixaban and Enoxaparin for Thromboprophylaxis After Total Knee Arthroplasty in Adults
Venous Thromboembolism (VTE)
Recruiting
Effect of Anti-inflammatory Diet in Osteoarthritis
Osteoarthritis, Knee
Active, not recruitingPhase 2/3
Single vs Triple Hyaluronic Acid in Knee Osteoarthritis
Osteoarthritis, Knee
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Konrad Malinowski, MD PhD principal investigator
Artromedical Orthopaedic Clinic, Bełchatów, Poland
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Biplanar PSI slope-reducing MOWHTO. in people with Knee Disease and Knee Osteoarthritis, run by Artromedical Konrad Malinowski Clinic at 1 site in Poland.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Jul 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Poland. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Feasibility of the 3D PSI device to achieve desired Medial Proximal Tibial Angle (time frame: Procedures will be perfomred on cadaveric limbs on 22th June 2022 and analyzed within 6 weeks). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05448742, which also lists 28 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Jul 2022.