AzTrials
AzTrials

NeuroprotectionNCT05445505

Neuroprotective Effects of iTBS in PD

A study testing intermittent theta burst stimulation in people with Neuroprotection and Parkinson Disease, run by Ruijin Hospital at 1 site in China.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) is an emerging non-invasive neuron regulation technique, which is widely used in neuropsychiatry for a variety of diseases and is widely accepted by patients due to its non-invasive, operable and relatively precise localization. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 20 to 80 years
What is being tested?
intermittent theta burst stimulation
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
60 participants
Where
1 siteChina
Study dates
1 Aug 2022to 31 Dec 2024
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 20 to 80 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Meet the revised clinical diagnostic criteria for Parkinson's disease of the Movement Disorder Society (MDS) International (2015 version).
  • aged >20 years and <80 years, regardless of gender.
  • 2 ≤ Hoehn-Yahr stage≤ 4.
  • Maintain medication stability during the study period.
  • Good compliance, written informed consent, and consent for long-term interventional treatment with iTBS.

Who cannot join

  • Patients with severe neuropsychiatric disorders or previous history of severe neurological disorders (e.g., epilepsy, cerebrovascular accidents, etc.) or history of traumatic brain injury or brain surgery.
  • Patients with significant cognitive impairment (MMSE < 24) or inability to complete questionnaires independently.
  • Prior treatment with TMS, DBS or SCS.
  • Severe physical illness and any physical illness that can precipitate epilepsy or intracranial hypertension, including cardiovascular and respiratory disease.
  • Have human implantable materials such as intracranial stents, pacemakers, coronary stents, cochlear implants, etc.
  • Are currently taking other investigational drugs.
  • Any other condition that the investigator deems unsuitable for participation in this study.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

China1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Department of neurology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine

    Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, 200025

    Jun Liu, Professor, 64370045 ext. +86-021, jly0520@hotmail.com

    Recruiting

Other trials in China

About this study

Official title: Neuroprotective Effects of Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation in Parkinson's Disease: a Delayed-start Randomized Double-blind Sham Controlled Study

Intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) is an emerging non-invasive neuron regulation technique, which is widely used in neuropsychiatry for a variety of diseases and is widely accepted by patients due to its non-invasive, operable and relatively precise localization. Combining the results of previous studies and our group's previous research, sixty qualified PD patients would be enrolled to conduct a prospective single-center randomized double-blind sham controlled clinical trial to verify the long-term curative effects of iTBS treatment protocol and explore the neuron-protection of iTBS on neuronal loss of PD patients.

Being tested
intermittent theta burst stimulation, sham iTBS
Medical subject headings
Parkinson Disease

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • intermittent theta burst stimulationDevice

    Also called iTBS

    iTBS is a new form of excitatory rTMS treatment that is less time-consuming and more effective than traditional rTMS in a single treatment session.

  • sham iTBSDevice

    The pseudo-stimulation device looks and sounds the same as the iTBS device

Study groups in NCT05445505
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Early-start single iTBS groupActive comparatorThe intensive period: 2 weeks The maintenance period: 12 weeks
Receives: Device: intermittent theta burst stimulation
Early-start double iTBS groupActive comparatorThe intensive period: 2 weeks The maintenance period: 12 weeks
Receives: Device: intermittent theta burst stimulation
Delayed-start single iTBS groupSham comparatorThe intensive period: sham/iTBS, 2 weeks The maintenance period: daily sham/iTBS, 12 weeks
Receives: Device: intermittent theta burst stimulation; Device: sham iTBS
Delayed-start double iTBS groupSham comparatorThe intensive period: sham/iTBS, 2 weeks The maintenance period: twice daily sham/iTBS, 12 weeks
Receives: Device: intermittent theta burst stimulation; Device: sham iTBS

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Group differences of part 3 of Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) changes

    Compare the changes in UPDRS scores from baseline to post-iTBS in the four intervention groups (UPDRS part3: range 0~72, higher score is related to a worse outcome).

    Measured: 28 weeks

Secondary outcomes (10)
  1. Group differences of Hoehn-Yahr stage

    Compare the changes in Hoehn-Yahr stage from baseline to post-iTBS in the four intervention groups (H-Y stage: range 0~5, higher score is related to a worse outcome).

    Measured: 28 weeks

  2. Group differences of Berg Balance Scale (BBS) changes

    Compare the changes in BBS scores from baseline to post-iTBS in the four intervention groups (BBS: range 0~56, higher score is related to a better outcome).

    Measured: 28 weeks

  3. Group differences of Hamilton depression scale-17 (HAMD-17) changes

    Compare the changes in HAMD-17 scores from baseline to post-iTBS in the four intervention groups (HAMD-17: range 0~38, higher score is related to a worse outcome).

    Measured: 28 weeks

  4. Group differences of Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAMA) changes

    Compare the changes in HAMA scores from baseline to post-iTBS in the four intervention groups (HAMA: range 0~64, higher score is related to a worse outcome).

    Measured: 28 weeks

  5. Group differences of Mini-mental State Examination (MMSE) changes

    Compare the changes in MMSE scores from baseline to post-iTBS in the four intervention groups (MMSE: range 0~30, higher score is related to a better outcome).

    Measured: 28 weeks

  6. Group differences of Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) changes

    Compare the changes in MoCA scores from baseline to post-iTBS in the four intervention groups (MoCA: range 0~30, higher score is related to a better outcome).

    Measured: 28 weeks

  7. Group differences of 39-item Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) changes

    Compare the changes in PDQ-39 scores from baseline to post-iTBS in the four intervention groups (PDQ-39: range 0~156, higher score is related to a worse outcome).

    Measured: 28 weeks

  8. Group differences of 16-item Sniffin' Sticks test (SS-16) changes

    Compare the changes in SS-16 scores from baseline to post-iTBS in the four intervention groups (SS-16: range 0~16, higher score is related to a better outcome).

    Measured: 28 weeks

  9. Group differences of Wexner changes

    Compare the changes in Wexner scores from baseline to post-iTBS in the four intervention groups (Wexner: range 0~30, higher score is related to a worse outcome).

    Measured: 28 weeks

  10. Group differences of adverse event

    Compare the adverse event in four intervention groups.

    Measured: 28 weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted6 Jul 2022
  2. Study start1 Aug 2022
  3. Primary completion30 Jun 2024 (estimated)
  4. Study completion31 Dec 2024 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
60 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05445505
Sponsor's protocol ID
2022043
Status last verified
May 2022
First submitted
23 Jun 2022
Last updated
9 May 2023
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No: No individual participant data (IPD) was available to other researchers.

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing intermittent theta burst stimulation in people with Neuroprotection and Parkinson Disease, run by Ruijin Hospital at 1 site in China.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 May 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Jun Liu, Professor (64370045 ext. +86-021, jly0520@hotmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Group differences of part 3 of Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) changes (time frame: 28 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 May 2023.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in