Endoscopic Ultrasonography-guided Fine Needle AspirationNCT05437497
Safety and Efficacy Evaluation of Remimazolam for Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Fine Needle Aspiration/Biopsy
A study testing Remimazolam Injection and Propofol Injection in people with Endoscopic Ultrasonography-guided Fine Needle Aspiration and Sedation Complication, run by The Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University at 1 site in China.
Trial summary
This study aims to compare the safety and efficacy of remimazolam and propofol in EUS-FNA/FNB sedation. This study is a prospective, single-blind study. We plan to enroll 264 patients undergoing EUS-FNA and divide them into two groups. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Endoscopic Ultrasonography-guided Fine Needle Aspiration, Sedation Complication, Remimazolam
- What is being tested?
- Remimazolam Injection and Propofol Injection
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 264 participants
- Where
- 1 siteChina
- Study dates
- 1 Aug 2021to 31 Dec 2022
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Age: ≥18 years old and ≤75 years old
- BMI: 18kg/m^2<BMI<30kg/m^2;
- Body weight: 40kg<weight<120kg
- Patients who intend and qualified to undergo sedated EUS-FNA/FNB.
- Clearly understand, voluntarily participate in the research, and sign the informed consent form.
Who cannot join
- Patients who are not suitable for sedated EUS-FNA/FNB for any reason (e.g. cardiovascular disease)
- Patients have abnormal liver function, AST and/or ALT≥2.5×ULN, TBIL≥1.5×ULN;
- Patients have abnormal renal function, urea or blood urea nitrogen≥1.5×ULN, serum creatinine≥1.0 ×ULN
- Those who are allergic to benzodiazepines, opioids, propofol or lidocaine.
- Patients have contraindications for benzodiazepines, opioids, propofol or lidocaine.
- Patients have benzodiazepines, opioids, propofol, lidocaine suspected narcotic drug abuse history and pain drug or sedative abuse.
- Patients have history of drug use and/or alcoholism within 2 years before the start of the period. Alcoholism means drinking more than 2 units of alcohol on average per day (1 unit = 360 mL of beer or 45 mL of liquor with an alcohol content of 40% or 150 mL of wine)
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
China1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
The Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University
Changsha, Hunan, 410013
Xiaoyan Wang, Doctor, +8673188618011, 912877437@qq.com
Ning Fang, Doctor, +8618160992303, golempowers@csu.edu.cn
About this study
This study aims to compare the safety and efficacy of remimazolam and propofol in EUS-FNA/FNB sedation. This study is a prospective, single-blind study. We plan to enroll 264 patients undergoing EUS-FNA and divide them into two groups. The experimental group was sedated with remimazolam, and the control group was sedated with propofol; safety and efficacy parameters such as intraoperative blood pressure, finger pulse oxygen, heart rate and sedation success rate would be compared. We hypothesized that patients in the experimental group would be superior in terms of safety parameters; the two would be equal in terms of sedation success.
Read the detailed description
Endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine needle aspiration/biopsy (EUS-FNA/FNB) is an important basis for the diagnosis of lesions in the upper gastrointestinal tract and adjacent organs, and plays an important role in the diagnosis of gastrointestinal tumors. Sedation is the key to a successful EUS-FNA/FNB procedure. However, intraoperative sedation in EUS-FNA/FNB is difficult and challenging. First, EUS-FNA/FNB requires a relatively long operation time and is prone to sedation-related adverse events, such as cardiovascular and cerebrovascular accidents. Second, EUS-FNA/FNB requires weakened gastrointestinal motility, thus deeper sedation is required during the operation; thirdly, the ultrasound probe used in EUS-FNA/FNB surgery is thicker than that of ordinary gastroscopes, which requires better cooperation from the patient. Therefore, the rational use of anesthesia drugs during surgery is required to ensure safety.
In current clinical studies, propofol is mostly used for anesthesia in patients undergoing EUS-FNA/FNB. In recent years, the defects of propofol for EUS sedation have gradually emerged, and its respiratory and circulatory inhibition effects have gradually caused researchers to worry. At present, propofol is still a commonly used EUS sedative drug, but with the improvement of people's requirements for sedation quality, its safety gradually cannot meet the demand. Therefore, it is the general trend to explore new EUS-FNA intraoperative sedation schemes.
Remimazolam is one of the new alternative drugs. Remimazolam is a new type of short-acting sedative-hypnotic drug, which has little inhibition on the respiratory system, less impact on hemodynamics, rapid onset of action, short half-life, rapid recovery, and no accumulation after long-term infusion. Thus, remimazolam is an effective drug for induction and maintenance of general anesthesia.
This study aims to compare the safety and efficacy of remimazolam and propofol in EUS-FNA/FNB sedation. This study is a prospective, single-blind interventional study. We plan to enroll 264 patients undergoing EUS-FNA and divide them into two groups. The experimental group was sedated with remimazolam, and the control group was sedated with propofol; safety and efficacy parameters such as intraoperative blood pressure, finger pulse oxygen, heart rate and sedation success rate would be compared. We hypothesized that patients in the experimental group would be superior in terms of safety parameters; the two would be equal in terms of sedation success.
This study is divided into the following steps:
- Informed consent and participant recruitment First of all, inform the patients of the source, purpose, significance, and possible benefits and risks of participating in this study, so that patients can decide whether to participate after they have a full understanding. Patients who participated voluntarily signed the informed consent form. Eligible patients (n=264) would be selected according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria.
- Information collection and participant screening Collect participant information, including name, gender, age, hospital number, enrollment date, education background, occupation, smoking status, drinking status, ASA classification, height, weight, lesion location, comorbidities (if any), medical history, physical examination results, laboratory examination results and imaging findings. Among them, physical examination results include general condition, upper limb skin, head, chest, abdomen, and necessary neurological examination results; laboratory results include blood routine, liver function, renal function, blood biochemistry, and coagulation routine. Imaging examinations are abdominal CT and other examination results that can reflect the location and size of the lesions.
- Randomization With the help of the random number table pre-generated by SPSS20.0 software, participants would be divided into two groups (1:1). The sedation regimen is determined according to the random number obtained by the patient's lottery. The randomization process was completed by the designated study designer. Neither the patients nor the endoscopist knew the grouping status.
- EUS-FNA/FNB information collection and preoperative preparation Collect operation information, including probe type, operation type, operator qualifications, operation indications, anesthesiologist qualifications, etc.
The patient fasted for at least 6 hours before the operation. Before the operation, the patient took 5ml of 2% lidocaine for topical anesthesia. Inhale oxygen for the patient (4L/min). The patient was placed in the left lateral decubitus position, connected to an ECG monitor, and venous access was established through the vein of the hand. The outpatient operating room is equipped with emergency facilities and equipment (emergency medicines, simple breathing balloons and masks, endotracheal intubation equipment and anesthesia machines).
- Sedation induction and maintenance
- Sedation protocol Remimazolam group: Background oxycodone injection: Slowly inject oxycodone(0.05mg/kg) intravenously. Three minutes (± 1min) after the end of oxycodone injection, begin sedation induction as follows. Sedation induction before EUS-FNA/FNB: the initial dose of remimazolam is 0.15-0.2 mg/kg, and the intravenous injection time is about 1 minute. If the subject's MOAA/S score is 1 point or below after the initial dose, EUS-FNA/FNB can be started; if the degree of sedation is insufficient, additional remimazolam(0.05 mg/kg each time) is allowed. The injection time of additional remimazolam is not less than 15 seconds, and the time interval between each additional administration is ≥ 2 minutes. Maintenance of sedation: In order to maintain the MOAA/S≤1, the investigator can decide to add remimazolam 0.05mg/kg each time, and the intravenous injection time should not be less than 15 seconds, with an additional administration interval of ≥ 2 minutes. Propofol group: Background oxycodone injection: Slowly inject oxycodone(0.05mg/kg) intravenously. Three minutes (± 1min) after the end of oxycodone injection , begin sedation induction as follows. Sedation induction before EUS-FNA/FNB: the initial dose of propofol is 1.5-2.0 mg/kg, and the intravenous injection time is about 1 minute. If the subject's MOAA/S score is 1 point or below after the initial dose, EUS-FNA/FNB can be started; if the degree of sedation is insufficient, additional propofol(0.5 mg/kg each time) is allowed. The injection time of additional propofol is not less than 15 seconds, and the time interval between each additional administration is ≥ 2 minutes. Maintenance of sedation: In order to maintain the MOAA/S≤1, the investigator can decide to add propofol 0.5mg/kg each time, and the intravenous injection time should not be less than 15 seconds, with an additional administration interval of ≥ 2 minutes
- Judgment of sedation failure After the sedation inducement, if more than 5 additional doses are injected in any 15-minute time period, it is considered as a sedation failure. The anesthesiologist should use other sedative rescue measures (such as propofol, etc.) to maintain. After the additional bolus of the sedative, if the participant is still unable to cooperate due to physical movement or other reasons, but the interval between the next additional bolus does not reach 2 minutes, the anesthesiologist can decide to give the subject other sedative rescue measures (such as propofol, etc.) .In this case, failed sedation should be judged due to the use of sedative rescue measures.
- Treatment protocol for adverse events The most likely adverse events in the study were respiratory depression, hypotension, and bradycardia. The corresponding treatment process is as follows: when the pulse oxygen saturation drops below 90% and does not recover spontaneously, the anesthesiologist will perform a 30-second chin lift operation; if blood oxygen saturation still cannot recover, increase the oxygen flow to 6L/min and the anesthesiologist compress the chest for assisted breathing; after 1 minute of observation, if there is still no recovery, a oxygen mask should be used; if it still cannot recover, perform mechanical ventilation or tracheal intubation. Hypotension was corrected with ephedrine (5 mg/time, intravenously) and bradycardia with atropine (0.5 mg/time, intravenously).
- EUS-FNA/FNB operation and postoperative recovery EUS-FNA/FNB should perform according to routine procedures. After EUS-FNA/FNB procedure, patients were monitored in the postoperative recovery room until the modified Alderte score was 9 or greater before patients were allowed to leave. Patients will fill out the Modified Brice Questionnaire before departure.
- Follow-up of patients 1-3 days after operation The patients were followed up 1-3 days after EUS/FNA-FNB to investigate the occurrence of adverse events and re-measure the changes of vital signs.
- Data recording The patient's heart rate, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, pulse oxygen saturation and MOAA/S score would be recorded every three minutes. Record the occurrence of adverse events, specific adverse event types, treatment methods and duration. 3) Record the total dosage of propofol or remimazolam after the operation.
- Conditions
- Endoscopic Ultrasonography-guided Fine Needle Aspiration, Sedation Complication, Remimazolam
- Being tested
- Remimazolam Injection, Propofol Injection
- Keywords
- Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration, Sedation Complication, remimazolam
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Remimazolam InjectionDrug
The experimental group was sedated with remimazolam
Propofol InjectionDrug
The control group was sedated with propofol
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Remimazolam group | Experimental | 1. Background oxycodone injection: Slowly inject oxycodone(0.05mg/kg) intravenously. Three minutes (± 1min) after the end of oxycodone injection , begin sedation induction as follows.
2. Sedation induction before EUS-FNA/FNB: the initial dose of remimazolam is 0.15-0.2 mg/kg, and the intravenous injection time is about 1 minute. If the subject's MOAA/S score is 1 point or below after the initial dose, EUS-FNA/FNB can be started; if the degree of sedation is insufficient, additional remimazolam(0.05 mg/kg each time) is allowed. The injection time of additional remimazolam is not less than 15 seconds, and the time interval between each additional administration is ≥ 2 minutes.
3. Maintenance of sedation: In order to maintain the MOAA/S≤1, the investigator can decide to add remimazolam 0.05mg/kg each time, and the intravenous injection time should not be less than 15 seconds, with an additional administration interval of ≥ 2 minutes. Receives: Drug: Remimazolam Injection |
| Propofol group | Active comparator | 1. Background oxycodone injection: Slowly inject oxycodone(0.05mg/kg) intravenously. Three minutes (± 1min) after the end of oxycodone injection , begin sedation induction as follows.
2. Sedation induction before EUS-FNA/FNB: the initial dose of propofol is 1.5-2.0 mg/kg, and the intravenous injection time is about 1 minute. If the subject's MOAA/S score is 1 point or below after the initial dose, EUS-FNA/FNB can be started; if the degree of sedation is insufficient, additional propofol(0.5 mg/kg each time) is allowed. The injection time of additional propofol is not less than 15 seconds, and the time interval between each additional administration is ≥ 2 minutes.
3. Maintenance of sedation: In order to maintain the MOAA/S≤1, the investigator can decide to add propofol 0.5mg/kg each time, and the intravenous injection time should not be less than 15 seconds, with an additional administration interval of ≥ 2 minutes. Receives: Drug: Propofol Injection |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Cardiopulmonary adverse event incidence
The occurrence of any one of the following reactions was recorded as "Cardiopulmonary Adverse Event", and the cardiopulmonary adverse event incidence was defined as the proportion of the subjects with cardiopulmonary adverse events in each group. Cardiopulmonary adverse events were defined as: any of the following conditions occurred during the operation: 1. respiratory depression: oxygen saturation <90%, or breathing <8 times/min; 2. apnea: respiratory airflow stopped for more than 15s; 3. hypotension: systolic blood pressure decrease greater than 20% of baseline systolic blood pressure; 4. hypertension: systolic blood pressure increase greater than 20% of baseline systolic blood pressure; 5. tachycardia: heart rate>100bpm for 1 minute or more; 6. bradycardia: HR<50, lasting 1 minute or more
Measured: The whole EUS-FNA/FNB procedure
Secondary outcomes (2)
Adverse event incidence
The respective incidence of each adverse event that occurred during the EUS-FNA/FNB procedure, such as the incidence of cough or body movement.
Measured: The whole EUS-FNA/FNB procedure
Sedation success rate:
Sedation success was defined as: completion of the entire procedure; no sedative rescue medication administered; ≤5 additional doses in any 15-minute period from the end of the initial dose of the trial drug. The sedation success rate was defined as the proportion of subjects in the group who were successfully sedated.
Measured: The whole EUS-FNA/FNB procedure
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted29 Jun 2022
- Study start1 Aug 2021
- Primary completion31 Dec 2022 (estimated)
- Study completion31 Dec 2022 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (18)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Endoscopic Ultrasonography-guided Fine Needle AspirationStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by The Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- The experimental group was sedated with remimazolam, and the control group was sedated with propofol;
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 264 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, wang xiaoyan, The Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University
- Investigators
- Xiaoyan Wang, Doctor, Principal investigator, The Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05437497
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- EUS-FNA-2022-01
- Status last verified
- Jun 2022
- First submitted
- 23 Jun 2022
- Last updated
- 29 Jun 2022
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: Some data underlying this trial cannot be shared publicly due to protection of participant's privacy.
Publications
Behrens A, Kreuzmayr A, Manner H, Koop H, Lorenz A, Schaefer C, Plauth M, Jetschmann JU, von Tirpitz C, Ewald M, Sackmann M, Renner W, Kruger M, Schwab D, Hoffmann W, Engelke O, Pech O, Kullmann F, Pampuch S, Lenfers B, Weickert U, Schilling D, Boehm S, Beckebaum S, Cicinnati V, Erckenbrecht JF, Dumoulin FL, Benz C, Rabenstein T, Haltern G, Balsliemke M, de Mas C, Kleber G, Pehl C, Vogt C, Kiesslich R, Fischbach W, Koop I, Kuehne J, Breidert M, Sass NL, May A, Friedrich C, Veitt R, Porschen R, Ellrichmann M, Arlt A, Schmitt W, Dollhopf M, Schmidbaur W, Dignass A, Schmitz V, Labenz J, Kaiser G, Krannich A, Barteska N, Ell C. Acute sedation-associated complications in GI endoscopy (ProSed 2 Study): results from the prospective multicentre electronic registry of sedation-associated complications. Gut. 2019 Mar;68(3):445-452. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2015-311037. Epub 2018 Jan 3.
PubMed 29298872Pagano N, Arosio M, Romeo F, Rando G, Del Conte G, Carlino A, Strangio G, Vitetta E, Malesci A, Repici A. Balanced Propofol Sedation in Patients Undergoing EUS-FNA: A Pilot Study to Assess Feasibility and Safety. Diagn Ther Endosc. 2011;2011:542159. doi: 10.1155/2011/542159. Epub 2011 Jul 12.
PubMed 21785561Fatima H, DeWitt J, LeBlanc J, Sherman S, McGreevy K, Imperiale TF. Nurse-administered propofol sedation for upper endoscopic ultrasonography. Am J Gastroenterol. 2008 Jul;103(7):1649-56. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2008.01906.x. Epub 2008 Jun 28.
PubMed 18557709Nayar DS, Guthrie WG, Goodman A, Lee Y, Feuerman M, Scheinberg L, Gress FG. Comparison of propofol deep sedation versus moderate sedation during endosonography. Dig Dis Sci. 2010 Sep;55(9):2537-44. doi: 10.1007/s10620-010-1308-0. Epub 2010 Jul 16.
PubMed 20635148Kim MG, Park SW, Kim JH, Lee J, Kae SH, Jang HJ, Koh DH, Choi MH. Etomidate versus propofol sedation for complex upper endoscopic procedures: a prospective double-blinded randomized controlled trial. Gastrointest Endosc. 2017 Sep;86(3):452-461. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2017.02.033. Epub 2017 Mar 8.
PubMed 28284883Heuss LT, Schnieper P, Drewe J, Pflimlin E, Beglinger C. Risk stratification and safe administration of propofol by registered nurses supervised by the gastroenterologist: a prospective observational study of more than 2000 cases. Gastrointest Endosc. 2003 May;57(6):664-71. doi: 10.1067/mge.2003.191.
PubMed 12709694Dewitt J, McGreevy K, Sherman S, Imperiale TF. Nurse-administered propofol sedation compared with midazolam and meperidine for EUS: a prospective, randomized trial. Gastrointest Endosc. 2008 Sep;68(3):499-509. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2008.02.092. Epub 2008 Jun 17.
PubMed 18561925Trummel JM, Surgenor SD, Cravero JP, Gordon SR, Blike GT. Comparison of differing sedation practice for upper endoscopic ultrasound using expert observational analysis of the procedural sedation. J Patient Saf. 2009 Sep;5(3):153-9. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0b013e3181b53f80.
PubMed 19927048Amornyotin S, Leelakusolvong S, Chalayonnawin W, Kongphlay S. Age-dependent safety analysis of propofol-based deep sedation for ERCP and EUS procedures at an endoscopy training center in a developing country. Clin Exp Gastroenterol. 2012;5:123-8. doi: 10.2147/CEG.S31275. Epub 2012 Jul 9.
PubMed 22826640Yusoff IF, Raymond G, Sahai AV. Endoscopist administered propofol for upper-GI EUS is safe and effective: a prospective study in 500 patients. Gastrointest Endosc. 2004 Sep;60(3):356-60. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(04)01711-0.
PubMed 15332023Ye L, Xiao X, Zhu L. The Comparison of Etomidate and Propofol Anesthesia in Patients Undergoing Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2017 Feb;27(1):1-7. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000373.
PubMed 28079763Wang F, Zhou Q, Shen M, Quan J, Chen J, Shi J, Zou X. Efficacy and safety of remimazolam in procedural sedation and analgesia: A protocol for systematic review and meta analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Jul 2;99(27):e20765. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000020765.
PubMed 32629656Pastis NJ, Yarmus LB, Schippers F, Ostroff R, Chen A, Akulian J, Wahidi M, Shojaee S, Tanner NT, Callahan SP, Feldman G, Lorch DG Jr, Ndukwu I, Pritchett MA, Silvestri GA; PAION Investigators. Safety and Efficacy of Remimazolam Compared With Placebo and Midazolam for Moderate Sedation During Bronchoscopy. Chest. 2019 Jan;155(1):137-146. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2018.09.015. Epub 2018 Oct 4.
PubMed 30292760Borkett KM, Riff DS, Schwartz HI, Winkle PJ, Pambianco DJ, Lees JP, Wilhelm-Ogunbiyi K. A Phase IIa, randomized, double-blind study of remimazolam (CNS 7056) versus midazolam for sedation in upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Anesth Analg. 2015 Apr;120(4):771-80. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000000548.
PubMed 25502841Pambianco DJ, Borkett KM, Riff DS, Winkle PJ, Schwartz HI, Melson TI, Wilhelm-Ogunbiyi K. A phase IIb study comparing the safety and efficacy of remimazolam and midazolam in patients undergoing colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2016 May;83(5):984-92. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2015.08.062. Epub 2015 Sep 9.
PubMed 26363333
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 29 Jun 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Safety and Efficacy Evaluation of Remimazolam for Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Fine Needle Aspiration/Biopsy
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05437497
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- EUS-FNA-2022-01
- Conditions
- Endoscopic Ultrasonography-guided Fine Needle Aspiration, Sedation Complication, Remimazolam
- Keywords
- Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration, Sedation Complication, remimazolam
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 264 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- The Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Aug 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Dec 2022 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 31 Dec 2022 (estimated)
- First posted
- 29 Jun 2022 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study aims to compare the safety and efficacy of remimazolam and propofol in EUS-FNA/FNB sedation. This study is a prospective, single-blind study. We plan to enroll 264 patients undergoing EUS-FNA and divide them into two groups. The experimental group was sedated with remimazolam, and the control group was sedated with propofol; safety and efficacy parameters such as intraoperative blood pressure, finger pulse oxygen, heart rate and sedation success rate would be compared. We hypothesized that patients in the experimental group would be superior in terms of safety parameters; the two would be equal in terms of sedation success.
Detailed description
Endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine needle aspiration/biopsy (EUS-FNA/FNB) is an important basis for the diagnosis of lesions in the upper gastrointestinal tract and adjacent organs, and plays an important role in the diagnosis of gastrointestinal tumors. Sedation is the key to a successful EUS-FNA/FNB procedure. However, intraoperative sedation in EUS-FNA/FNB is difficult and challenging. First, EUS-FNA/FNB requires a relatively long operation time and is prone to sedation-related adverse events, such as cardiovascular and cerebrovascular accidents. Second, EUS-FNA/FNB requires weakened gastrointestinal motility, thus deeper sedation is required during the operation; thirdly, the ultrasound probe used in EUS-FNA/FNB surgery is thicker than that of ordinary gastroscopes, which requires better cooperation from the patient. Therefore, the rational use of anesthesia drugs during surgery is required to ensure safety.
In current clinical studies, propofol is mostly used for anesthesia in patients undergoing EUS-FNA/FNB. In recent years, the defects of propofol for EUS sedation have gradually emerged, and its respiratory and circulatory inhibition effects have gradually caused researchers to worry. At present, propofol is still a commonly used EUS sedative drug, but with the improvement of people's requirements for sedation quality, its safety gradually cannot meet the demand. Therefore, it is the general trend to explore new EUS-FNA intraoperative sedation schemes.
Remimazolam is one of the new alternative drugs. Remimazolam is a new type of short-acting sedative-hypnotic drug, which has little inhibition on the respiratory system, less impact on hemodynamics, rapid onset of action, short half-life, rapid recovery, and no accumulation after long-term infusion. Thus, remimazolam is an effective drug for induction and maintenance of general anesthesia.
This study aims to compare the safety and efficacy of remimazolam and propofol in EUS-FNA/FNB sedation. This study is a prospective, single-blind interventional study. We plan to enroll 264 patients undergoing EUS-FNA and divide them into two groups. The experimental group was sedated with remimazolam, and the control group was sedated with propofol; safety and efficacy parameters such as intraoperative blood pressure, finger pulse oxygen, heart rate and sedation success rate would be compared. We hypothesized that patients in the experimental group would be superior in terms of safety parameters; the two would be equal in terms of sedation success.
This study is divided into the following steps:
- Informed consent and participant recruitment First of all, inform the patients of the source, purpose, significance, and possible benefits and risks of participating in this study, so that patients can decide whether to participate after they have a full understanding. Patients who participated voluntarily signed the informed consent form. Eligible patients (n=264) would be selected according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria.
- Information collection and participant screening Collect participant information, including name, gender, age, hospital number, enrollment date, education background, occupation, smoking status, drinking status, ASA classification, height, weight, lesion location, comorbidities (if any), medical history, physical examination results, laboratory examination results and imaging findings. Among them, physical examination results include general condition, upper limb skin, head, chest, abdomen, and necessary neurological examination results; laboratory results include blood routine, liver function, renal function, blood biochemistry, and coagulation routine. Imaging examinations are abdominal CT and other examination results that can reflect the location and size of the lesions.
- Randomization With the help of the random number table pre-generated by SPSS20.0 software, participants would be divided into two groups (1:1). The sedation regimen is determined according to the random number obtained by the patient's lottery. The randomization process was completed by the designated study designer. Neither the patients nor the endoscopist knew the grouping status.
- EUS-FNA/FNB information collection and preoperative preparation Collect operation information, including probe type, operation type, operator qualifications, operation indications, anesthesiologist qualifications, etc.
The patient fasted for at least 6 hours before the operation. Before the operation, the patient took 5ml of 2% lidocaine for topical anesthesia. Inhale oxygen for the patient (4L/min). The patient was placed in the left lateral decubitus position, connected to an ECG monitor, and venous access was established through the vein of the hand. The outpatient operating room is equipped with emergency facilities and equipment (emergency medicines, simple breathing balloons and masks, endotracheal intubation equipment and anesthesia machines).
- Sedation induction and maintenance
- Sedation protocol Remimazolam group: Background oxycodone injection: Slowly inject oxycodone(0.05mg/kg) intravenously. Three minutes (± 1min) after the end of oxycodone injection, begin sedation induction as follows. Sedation induction before EUS-FNA/FNB: the initial dose of remimazolam is 0.15-0.2 mg/kg, and the intravenous injection time is about 1 minute. If the subject's MOAA/S score is 1 point or below after the initial dose, EUS-FNA/FNB can be started; if the degree of sedation is insufficient, additional remimazolam(0.05 mg/kg each time) is allowed. The injection time of additional remimazolam is not less than 15 seconds, and the time interval between each additional administration is ≥ 2 minutes. Maintenance of sedation: In order to maintain the MOAA/S≤1, the investigator can decide to add remimazolam 0.05mg/kg each time, and the intravenous injection time should not be less than 15 seconds, with an additional administration interval of ≥ 2 minutes. Propofol group: Background oxycodone injection: Slowly inject oxycodone(0.05mg/kg) intravenously. Three minutes (± 1min) after the end of oxycodone injection , begin sedation induction as follows. Sedation induction before EUS-FNA/FNB: the initial dose of propofol is 1.5-2.0 mg/kg, and the intravenous injection time is about 1 minute. If the subject's MOAA/S score is 1 point or below after the initial dose, EUS-FNA/FNB can be started; if the degree of sedation is insufficient, additional propofol(0.5 mg/kg each time) is allowed. The injection time of additional propofol is not less than 15 seconds, and the time interval between each additional administration is ≥ 2 minutes. Maintenance of sedation: In order to maintain the MOAA/S≤1, the investigator can decide to add propofol 0.5mg/kg each time, and the intravenous injection time should not be less than 15 seconds, with an additional administration interval of ≥ 2 minutes
- Judgment of sedation failure After the sedation inducement, if more than 5 additional doses are injected in any 15-minute time period, it is considered as a sedation failure. The anesthesiologist should use other sedative rescue measures (such as propofol, etc.) to maintain. After the additional bolus of the sedative, if the participant is still unable to cooperate due to physical movement or other reasons, but the interval between the next additional bolus does not reach 2 minutes, the anesthesiologist can decide to give the subject other sedative rescue measures (such as propofol, etc.) .In this case, failed sedation should be judged due to the use of sedative rescue measures.
- Treatment protocol for adverse events The most likely adverse events in the study were respiratory depression, hypotension, and bradycardia. The corresponding treatment process is as follows: when the pulse oxygen saturation drops below 90% and does not recover spontaneously, the anesthesiologist will perform a 30-second chin lift operation; if blood oxygen saturation still cannot recover, increase the oxygen flow to 6L/min and the anesthesiologist compress the chest for assisted breathing; after 1 minute of observation, if there is still no recovery, a oxygen mask should be used; if it still cannot recover, perform mechanical ventilation or tracheal intubation. Hypotension was corrected with ephedrine (5 mg/time, intravenously) and bradycardia with atropine (0.5 mg/time, intravenously).
- EUS-FNA/FNB operation and postoperative recovery EUS-FNA/FNB should perform according to routine procedures. After EUS-FNA/FNB procedure, patients were monitored in the postoperative recovery room until the modified Alderte score was 9 or greater before patients were allowed to leave. Patients will fill out the Modified Brice Questionnaire before departure.
- Follow-up of patients 1-3 days after operation The patients were followed up 1-3 days after EUS/FNA-FNB to investigate the occurrence of adverse events and re-measure the changes of vital signs.
- Data recording The patient's heart rate, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, pulse oxygen saturation and MOAA/S score would be recorded every three minutes. Record the occurrence of adverse events, specific adverse event types, treatment methods and duration. 3) Record the total dosage of propofol or remimazolam after the operation.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- The experimental group was sedated with remimazolam, and the control group was sedated with propofol;
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Remimazolam group | Experimental | Drug: Remimazolam Injection1. Background oxycodone injection: Slowly inject oxycodone(0.05mg/kg) intravenously. Three minutes (± 1min) after the end of oxycodone injection , begin sedation induction as follows. 2. Sedation induction before EUS-FNA/FNB: the initial dose of remimazolam is 0.15-0.2 mg/kg, and the intravenous injection time is about 1 minute. If the subject's MOAA/S score is 1 point or below after the initial dose, EUS-FNA/FNB can be started; if the degree of sedation is insufficient, additional remimazolam(0.05 mg/kg each time) is allowed. The injection time of additional remimazolam is not less than 15 seconds, and the time interval between each additional administration is ≥ 2 minutes. 3. Maintenance of sedation: In order to maintain the MOAA/S≤1, the investigator can decide to add remimazolam 0.05mg/kg each time, and the intravenous injection time should not be less than 15 seconds, with an additional administration interval of ≥ 2 minutes. |
| Propofol group | Active comparator | Drug: Propofol Injection1. Background oxycodone injection: Slowly inject oxycodone(0.05mg/kg) intravenously. Three minutes (± 1min) after the end of oxycodone injection , begin sedation induction as follows. 2. Sedation induction before EUS-FNA/FNB: the initial dose of propofol is 1.5-2.0 mg/kg, and the intravenous injection time is about 1 minute. If the subject's MOAA/S score is 1 point or below after the initial dose, EUS-FNA/FNB can be started; if the degree of sedation is insufficient, additional propofol(0.5 mg/kg each time) is allowed. The injection time of additional propofol is not less than 15 seconds, and the time interval between each additional administration is ≥ 2 minutes. 3. Maintenance of sedation: In order to maintain the MOAA/S≤1, the investigator can decide to add propofol 0.5mg/kg each time, and the intravenous injection time should not be less than 15 seconds, with an additional administration interval of ≥ 2 minutes. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 75 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Age: ≥18 years old and ≤75 years old
- BMI: 18kg/m^2<BMI<30kg/m^2;
- Body weight: 40kg<weight<120kg
- Patients who intend and qualified to undergo sedated EUS-FNA/FNB.
- Clearly understand, voluntarily participate in the research, and sign the informed consent form.
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Patients who are not suitable for sedated EUS-FNA/FNB for any reason (e.g. cardiovascular disease)
- Patients have abnormal liver function, AST and/or ALT≥2.5×ULN, TBIL≥1.5×ULN;
- Patients have abnormal renal function, urea or blood urea nitrogen≥1.5×ULN, serum creatinine≥1.0 ×ULN
- Those who are allergic to benzodiazepines, opioids, propofol or lidocaine.
- Patients have contraindications for benzodiazepines, opioids, propofol or lidocaine.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Remimazolam InjectionThe experimental group was sedated with remimazolam | Drug | Remimazolam group |
| Propofol InjectionThe control group was sedated with propofol | Drug | Propofol group |
Primary outcome
Cardiopulmonary adverse event incidence
Time frame: The whole EUS-FNA/FNB procedure
The occurrence of any one of the following reactions was recorded as "Cardiopulmonary Adverse Event", and the cardiopulmonary adverse event incidence was defined as the proportion of the subjects with cardiopulmonary adverse events in each group. Cardiopulmonary adverse events were defined as: any of the following conditions occurred during the operation: 1. respiratory depression: oxygen saturation <90%, or breathing <8 times/min; 2. apnea: respiratory airflow stopped for more than 15s; 3. hypotension: systolic blood pressure decrease greater than 20% of baseline systolic blood pressure; 4. hypertension: systolic blood pressure increase greater than 20% of baseline systolic blood pressure; 5. tachycardia: heart rate>100bpm for 1 minute or more; 6. bradycardia: HR<50, lasting 1 minute or more
2 secondary outcomes
Adverse event incidence
Time frame: The whole EUS-FNA/FNB procedure
Sedation success rate:
Time frame: The whole EUS-FNA/FNB procedure
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 29 Jun 2022.
- Background: PubMed 29298872Behrens A, Kreuzmayr A, Manner H, Koop H, Lorenz A, Schaefer C, Plauth M, Jetschmann JU, von Tirpitz C, Ewald M, Sackmann M, Renner W, Kruger M, Schwab D, Hoffmann W, Engelke O, Pech O, Kullmann F, Pampuch S, Lenfers B, Weickert U, Schilling D, Boehm S, Beckebaum S, Cicinnati V, Erckenbrecht JF, Dumoulin FL, Benz C, Rabenstein T, Haltern G, Balsliemke M, de Mas C, Kleber G, Pehl C, Vogt C, Kiesslich R, Fischbach W, Koop I, Kuehne J, Breidert M, Sass NL, May A, Friedrich C, Veitt R, Porschen R, Ellrichmann M, Arlt A, Schmitt W, Dollhopf M, Schmidbaur W, Dignass A, Schmitz V, Labenz J, Kaiser G, Krannich A, Barteska N, Ell C. Acute sedation-associated complications in GI endoscopy (ProSed 2 Study): results from the prospective multicentre electronic registry of sedation-associated complications. Gut. 2019 Mar;68(3):445-452. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2015-311037. Epub 2018 Jan 3.
- Background: PubMed 21785561Pagano N, Arosio M, Romeo F, Rando G, Del Conte G, Carlino A, Strangio G, Vitetta E, Malesci A, Repici A. Balanced Propofol Sedation in Patients Undergoing EUS-FNA: A Pilot Study to Assess Feasibility and Safety. Diagn Ther Endosc. 2011;2011:542159. doi: 10.1155/2011/542159. Epub 2011 Jul 12.
- Background: PubMed 18557709Fatima H, DeWitt J, LeBlanc J, Sherman S, McGreevy K, Imperiale TF. Nurse-administered propofol sedation for upper endoscopic ultrasonography. Am J Gastroenterol. 2008 Jul;103(7):1649-56. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2008.01906.x. Epub 2008 Jun 28.
- Background: PubMed 20635148Nayar DS, Guthrie WG, Goodman A, Lee Y, Feuerman M, Scheinberg L, Gress FG. Comparison of propofol deep sedation versus moderate sedation during endosonography. Dig Dis Sci. 2010 Sep;55(9):2537-44. doi: 10.1007/s10620-010-1308-0. Epub 2010 Jul 16.
- Background: PubMed 28284883Kim MG, Park SW, Kim JH, Lee J, Kae SH, Jang HJ, Koh DH, Choi MH. Etomidate versus propofol sedation for complex upper endoscopic procedures: a prospective double-blinded randomized controlled trial. Gastrointest Endosc. 2017 Sep;86(3):452-461. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2017.02.033. Epub 2017 Mar 8.
- Background: PubMed 12709694Heuss LT, Schnieper P, Drewe J, Pflimlin E, Beglinger C. Risk stratification and safe administration of propofol by registered nurses supervised by the gastroenterologist: a prospective observational study of more than 2000 cases. Gastrointest Endosc. 2003 May;57(6):664-71. doi: 10.1067/mge.2003.191.
- Background: PubMed 18561925Dewitt J, McGreevy K, Sherman S, Imperiale TF. Nurse-administered propofol sedation compared with midazolam and meperidine for EUS: a prospective, randomized trial. Gastrointest Endosc. 2008 Sep;68(3):499-509. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2008.02.092. Epub 2008 Jun 17.
- Background: PubMed 19927048Trummel JM, Surgenor SD, Cravero JP, Gordon SR, Blike GT. Comparison of differing sedation practice for upper endoscopic ultrasound using expert observational analysis of the procedural sedation. J Patient Saf. 2009 Sep;5(3):153-9. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0b013e3181b53f80.
- Background: PubMed 22826640Amornyotin S, Leelakusolvong S, Chalayonnawin W, Kongphlay S. Age-dependent safety analysis of propofol-based deep sedation for ERCP and EUS procedures at an endoscopy training center in a developing country. Clin Exp Gastroenterol. 2012;5:123-8. doi: 10.2147/CEG.S31275. Epub 2012 Jul 9.
- Background: PubMed 15332023Yusoff IF, Raymond G, Sahai AV. Endoscopist administered propofol for upper-GI EUS is safe and effective: a prospective study in 500 patients. Gastrointest Endosc. 2004 Sep;60(3):356-60. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(04)01711-0.
- Background: PubMed 28079763Ye L, Xiao X, Zhu L. The Comparison of Etomidate and Propofol Anesthesia in Patients Undergoing Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2017 Feb;27(1):1-7. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000373.
- Background: PubMed 32629656Wang F, Zhou Q, Shen M, Quan J, Chen J, Shi J, Zou X. Efficacy and safety of remimazolam in procedural sedation and analgesia: A protocol for systematic review and meta analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Jul 2;99(27):e20765. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000020765.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. Some data underlying this trial cannot be shared publicly due to protection of participant's privacy.
Related trials for Endoscopic Ultrasonography-guided Fine Needle Aspiration
Recruiting
MCB vs EUS-FNA for Preoperative Pathological Evaluation of Gastric SMT
Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor of Stomach, Submucosal Tumor of Stomach
Not yet recruiting
22G-Adapt vs 22G-Franseen Needle Biopsy in EUS-Guided Tissue Acquisition of Solid Lesions
Pancreatic Neoplasms, Mediastinal Neoplasms
Recruiting
RCT Comparing Accuracy Among Franseen, Forward-bevel Westcott, and Fork-tip EUS-FNB Needle in Diagnosis of Solid Pancreatic Lesions
Pancreatic Masses
Not yet recruiting
The 22G Trident Needle Combined With Different Aspiration Techniques for Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Fine-needle Biopsy
Pancreatic Diseases
Not yet recruiting
The 22G Franseen Needle Combined With Different Aspiration Techniques for Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Fine-needle Biopsy
Pancreatic Diseases
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Xiaoyan Wang, Doctor principal investigator
The Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Remimazolam Injection and Propofol Injection in people with Endoscopic Ultrasonography-guided Fine Needle Aspiration and Sedation Complication, run by The Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University at 1 site in China.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Jun 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Xiaoyan Wang, Doctor (+8673188618011, 912877437@qq.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Cardiopulmonary adverse event incidence (time frame: The whole EUS-FNA/FNB procedure). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05437497, which also lists 18 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Jun 2022.