COVID-19INTEGRATENCT05382130
INTEGrating Ag-RDTs for COVID-19 in MNCH,HIV and TB Services in Cameroon and Kenya
A study testing Test all in people with COVID-19, run by Elizabeth Glaser Pediatric AIDS Foundation at 2 sites in 2 countries.
Trial summary
Integration of antigen-detecting rapid diagnostic tests (Ag-RDT) for COVID-19 into services that provide care for vulnerable populations such as pregnant women, children, people with HIV infection, and patients with tuberculosis (TB) will identify more people with Coronavirus infection. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 2 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- COVID-19
- What is being tested?
- Test all
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 152,082 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesin 2 countries
- Study dates
- 17 May 2022to 31 Mar 2023
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 2 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Age ≥ 2 years.
- Identified as SARS-CoV-2 positive during the study.
- Willing and able to provide informed consent or parental consent +/- assent for the study participation according to the national guidelines
Who cannot join
- Significant medical or psychological condition that would preclude active study participation or ability to provide informed consent.
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 2 countries.
2 sites in 2 countries
About this study
Official title: INTEGrating Rapid Antigen TEsting for SARS-CoV-2 in Maternal, Neonatal and Child Health, HIV and Tuberculosis Services in Cameroon and Kenya: A Cluster Randomized Trial of Two Models
Integration of antigen-detecting rapid diagnostic tests (Ag-RDT) for COVID-19 into services that provide care for vulnerable populations such as pregnant women, children, people with HIV infection, and patients with tuberculosis (TB) will identify more people with Coronavirus infection. This will allow for earlier treatment and tracing of contacts to decrease the spread of the coronavirus. This study is looking at two models for providing the testing in Maternal, Newborn and Child Health (MNCH), Tuberculosis (TB) and HIV clinics in Cameroon and Kenya. In some clinics, attendees with be screened for Coronavirus symptoms and history of exposure and if positive they will receive the rapid coronavirus test right in the clinic. In other facilities, all people attending the clinic with be provided with the coronavirus testing even if they screen negative to see how many people are infected but do not show any symptoms. Hospitalized and non-hospitalized patients with the coronavirus infection will be followed to document their illness and health outcomes. We will also ask health care workers about how well the testing in these clinics is working and what are some of their challenges, and collect information about the costs associated with both the models of testing.
Read the detailed description
Rationale: The use of simple, rapid and affordable antigen-detecting rapid diagnostic tests (Ag-RDT) to expand access to SARS-CoV-2 testing is being incorporated in many national COVID-19 response plans including Cameroon and Kenya. Targeting populations at high risk of COVID-19 disease, more severe outcomes, and onward transmission to other vulnerable populations such as pregnant women, people living with HIV, and patients with TB has the potential to mitigate the adverse effects of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Data on SARS-CoV-2 infection in these populations in Africa and the feasibility of integrating Ag-RDT within MNCH, HIV, and TB services are limited. Most current programs use a screen and test strategy to identify symptomatic infection and those at risk due to exposure because of the limited availability and costs of broader testing. However, this strategy does not identify those with asymptomatic infection who also contribute to the spread of SARS-CoV-2 infection.
Design: We will conduct a pragmatic cluster randomized trial to determine the SARS-CoV-2 case detection rate in facilities randomized to the standard "screen and test" model of SARS-CoV-2 Ag-RDT compared to a "test all" model of SARS-CoV-2 Ag-RDT in MNCH, HIV and TB clinics. We will describe clinical outcomes of SARS-CoV-2 infection and determine the feasibility and costs associated with each model. In each country, we propose to randomly allocate 10 purposively chosen facilities to the "test all" arm and standard of care arm in a 1:1 ratio. We plan to enroll at least 6000 patients per arm.
Screening and testing data on all individuals attending MNCH, TB and HIV clinics will be recorded in clinic records and captured into an electronic database that will be accessed for this study. SARS-CoV-2 positive patients will be followed prospectively to determine the SARS-CoV-2 cascade from testing, ascertainment of disease status, linkage to care, disease progression, to treatment and outcomes for hospitalized and non-hospitalized patients. Disease progression and outcome data will be collected through phone interviews from patients who are not hospitalized and through interview and medical record extraction for hospitalized patients. SARS-CoV-2 positive study participants will be given contact tracing and testing forms for their contacts, which will capture anonymous testing data when contacts access the Ag-RDT testing at the health facility.
The feasibility of the two models of integration will be captured through a structured questionnaire administered to health care workers and the collection of time-motion data to determine provider and patient time required to conduct the Ag-RDT testing. The service delivery costs of each model (such as personnel, training, equipment, tests, documentation) will be determined.
Outcomes: Primary outcomes include the SARS-CoV-2 case detection rates and the number/ proportion of contacts tested and diagnosed with SARS-CoV-2 infection. Secondary outcomes include testing rates, linkage to care, disease progression, treatment and final outcome for SARS-CoV-2 infected patients and the feasibility and cost of integration in the two models. The primary analysis will summarize SARS-CoV-2 detection rates and associated 95% confidence intervals for each facility. The overall case identification rates for each arm will be estimated using inverse variance weighted method to combine rates across facilities. The effect of the intervention and associated 95% confidence intervals will be estimated using Poisson regression and expressed as a relative risk. Lower 95% confidence interval limit above 1 will indicate significant increase in the case detection rates due to "test all" intervention. Additional sub group analyses will examine effects of the "test all" intervention across the different clinics and different countries. To account for potential clustering of outcomes by health facility, we will estimate robust standard errors in the regression models.
Duration: it is anticipated that study enrolment will take approximately 4 months with an additional 1 month to complete study follow-up, and 3-4 months for data analysis and reporting.
- Conditions
- COVID-19
- Being tested
- Test all
- Keywords
- Antigen rapid diagnostic test, Integration, COVID-19, Health Facilities, Africa
- Medical subject headings
- COVID-19
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Test allDiagnostic test
In the "test all" arm, SARS-CoV-2 infection screening questions will be administered to all clinic attendees followed by SARS-CoV-2 Ag-RDT testing irrespective of screening results.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Test All | Experimental | MNCH, HIV, and TB clinic attendees are offered SARS-CoV-2 testing regardless of symptoms. Receives: Diagnostic Test: Test all |
| Screen and Test | No intervention | Populations are screened and tested for SARS-CoV-2 according to the MOH testing guidelines model. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
SARS-CoV-2 case detection rate
Number of SARS-CoV-2 infections detected per 100 clinic attendees
Measured: 6 months
Proportion of contacts tested for SARS-CoV2 infection
Number of contacts tested per 100 clinic attendees
Measured: 6 months
Proportion of contacts identified with SARS-CoV-2 infection
Number of contacts testing positive for SARS-CoV2 infection as a proportion of the number contacts tested
Measured: 6 months
Secondary outcomes (4)
Testing rates, linkage to care, disease progression, treatment and final outcome for SARS-CoV-2 infected patients
Number of patients accepting (or refusing) testing divided by the total number of patients attending the 3 clinics
Measured: 6 months
Linkage to care for SARS-CoV-2 infected patients
Number of SARS-CoV-2 positive patients linked to care and treatment divided by the number of SARS-CoV2 positive patients
Measured: 6 months
Disease progression, treatment and final outcome for SARS-CoV-2 infected patients
Number of asymptomatic patients progressing to symptomatic disease and admission to hospital, divided by number asymptomatic patients Number of patients hospitalized for COVID-19 divided by the number of patients with COVID-19
Measured: 6 months
Feasibility and acceptability of integrating the model and the cost of the test-all versus screen-and-test models
- Health care provider perceptions of the feasibility and acceptability of integrating SARS-CoV-2 Ag-RDT in their clinics; the ability to provide service, speed of service delivery, and concerns or challenges on the feasibility and acceptability of integration;
- Effect of integration on health care providers and patients' time in clinic.
- Costs associated with implementation of the "test all" model compared to the "screen and test" model
Measured: 6 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted19 May 2022
- Study start17 May 2022
- Primary completion31 Mar 2023
- Study completion31 Mar 2023
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for COVID-19Studies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 152,082 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Elizabeth Glaser Pediatric AIDS Foundation
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- UNITAID, Kenya Ministry of Health, Ministry of Public Health, Cameroon
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Nilesh Bhatt, MD,MMed,PhD, Principal investigator, Elizabeth Glaser Pediatric AIDS FoundationBoris Tchounga, MD, PhD, Principal investigator, Elizabeth Glaser Pediatric AIDS FoundationRose Otieno Masaba, MD, MSc, Principal investigator, Elizabeth Glaser Pediatric AIDS Foundation
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05382130
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- EG0274
- Acronym
- INTEGRATE
- Status last verified
- Jan 2024
- First submitted
- 17 May 2022
- Last updated
- 11 Jan 2024
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: Anonymized participant data will be made available upon requests directed to the corresponding author. Proposals will be reviewed and approved by the sponsor, investigator, and collaborators on the basis of scientific merit. After approval of a proposal, data can be shared through a secure online platform after signing a data-sharing agreement. All data will be made available for a minimum of 3 years from the end of the trial.
Publications
Bhatt N, Masaba RO, Tchounga B, Yemaneberhan A, Simo L, Katcho TD, Ndimbii J, Siamba S, Mwancha-Kwasa C, Epee E, Zoung-Kanyi Bissek AC, Pearson S, Tiam A, Guay L, Machekano R. Integrating SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen testing in maternal, neonatal and child health, HIV and tuberculosis services in Cameroon and Kenya: a cluster randomised trial of two testing models. BMJ Public Health. 2025 Jul 13;2(Suppl 1):e000873. doi: 10.1136/bmjph-2023-000873. eCollection 2024 Jul.
PubMed 41190341Ndimbii J, Djikeussi T, Kana R, Siamba S, Machekano R, Bhatt N, Yemaneberhan A, Pearson S, Wanyama E, Mwancha-Kwasa C, Epee E, Tchounga B, Tiam A, Masaba RO. Assessing time requirements of two models of SARS-CoV-2 screening and testing in routine healthcare services in Kenya and Cameroon: a descriptive study. BMJ Public Health. 2025 Mar 22;2(Suppl 1):e001154. doi: 10.1136/bmjph-2024-001154. eCollection 2024 Jul.
PubMed 40599610
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 11 Jan 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- INTEGrating Rapid Antigen TEsting for SARS-CoV-2 in Maternal, Neonatal and Child Health, HIV and Tuberculosis Services in Cameroon and Kenya: A Cluster Randomized Trial of Two Models
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05382130
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- INTEGRATE / EG0274
- Conditions
- COVID-19
- Keywords
- Antigen rapid diagnostic test, Integration, COVID-19, Health Facilities, Africa
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 152,082 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Elizabeth Glaser Pediatric AIDS FoundationUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- UNITAID, Kenya Ministry of Health, Ministry of Public Health, Cameroon
- Study start
- 17 May 2022 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Mar 2023 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 Mar 2023 (actual)
- First posted
- 19 May 2022 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Integration of antigen-detecting rapid diagnostic tests (Ag-RDT) for COVID-19 into services that provide care for vulnerable populations such as pregnant women, children, people with HIV infection, and patients with tuberculosis (TB) will identify more people with Coronavirus infection. This will allow for earlier treatment and tracing of contacts to decrease the spread of the coronavirus. This study is looking at two models for providing the testing in Maternal, Newborn and Child Health (MNCH), Tuberculosis (TB) and HIV clinics in Cameroon and Kenya. In some clinics, attendees with be screened for Coronavirus symptoms and history of exposure and if positive they will receive the rapid coronavirus test right in the clinic. In other facilities, all people attending the clinic with be provided with the coronavirus testing even if they screen negative to see how many people are infected but do not show any symptoms. Hospitalized and non-hospitalized patients with the coronavirus infection will be followed to document their illness and health outcomes. We will also ask health care workers about how well the testing in these clinics is working and what are some of their challenges, and collect information about the costs associated with both the models of testing.
Detailed description
Rationale: The use of simple, rapid and affordable antigen-detecting rapid diagnostic tests (Ag-RDT) to expand access to SARS-CoV-2 testing is being incorporated in many national COVID-19 response plans including Cameroon and Kenya. Targeting populations at high risk of COVID-19 disease, more severe outcomes, and onward transmission to other vulnerable populations such as pregnant women, people living with HIV, and patients with TB has the potential to mitigate the adverse effects of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Data on SARS-CoV-2 infection in these populations in Africa and the feasibility of integrating Ag-RDT within MNCH, HIV, and TB services are limited. Most current programs use a screen and test strategy to identify symptomatic infection and those at risk due to exposure because of the limited availability and costs of broader testing. However, this strategy does not identify those with asymptomatic infection who also contribute to the spread of SARS-CoV-2 infection.
Design: We will conduct a pragmatic cluster randomized trial to determine the SARS-CoV-2 case detection rate in facilities randomized to the standard "screen and test" model of SARS-CoV-2 Ag-RDT compared to a "test all" model of SARS-CoV-2 Ag-RDT in MNCH, HIV and TB clinics. We will describe clinical outcomes of SARS-CoV-2 infection and determine the feasibility and costs associated with each model. In each country, we propose to randomly allocate 10 purposively chosen facilities to the "test all" arm and standard of care arm in a 1:1 ratio. We plan to enroll at least 6000 patients per arm.
Screening and testing data on all individuals attending MNCH, TB and HIV clinics will be recorded in clinic records and captured into an electronic database that will be accessed for this study. SARS-CoV-2 positive patients will be followed prospectively to determine the SARS-CoV-2 cascade from testing, ascertainment of disease status, linkage to care, disease progression, to treatment and outcomes for hospitalized and non-hospitalized patients. Disease progression and outcome data will be collected through phone interviews from patients who are not hospitalized and through interview and medical record extraction for hospitalized patients. SARS-CoV-2 positive study participants will be given contact tracing and testing forms for their contacts, which will capture anonymous testing data when contacts access the Ag-RDT testing at the health facility.
The feasibility of the two models of integration will be captured through a structured questionnaire administered to health care workers and the collection of time-motion data to determine provider and patient time required to conduct the Ag-RDT testing. The service delivery costs of each model (such as personnel, training, equipment, tests, documentation) will be determined.
Outcomes: Primary outcomes include the SARS-CoV-2 case detection rates and the number/ proportion of contacts tested and diagnosed with SARS-CoV-2 infection. Secondary outcomes include testing rates, linkage to care, disease progression, treatment and final outcome for SARS-CoV-2 infected patients and the feasibility and cost of integration in the two models. The primary analysis will summarize SARS-CoV-2 detection rates and associated 95% confidence intervals for each facility. The overall case identification rates for each arm will be estimated using inverse variance weighted method to combine rates across facilities. The effect of the intervention and associated 95% confidence intervals will be estimated using Poisson regression and expressed as a relative risk. Lower 95% confidence interval limit above 1 will indicate significant increase in the case detection rates due to "test all" intervention. Additional sub group analyses will examine effects of the "test all" intervention across the different clinics and different countries. To account for potential clustering of outcomes by health facility, we will estimate robust standard errors in the regression models.
Duration: it is anticipated that study enrolment will take approximately 4 months with an additional 1 month to complete study follow-up, and 3-4 months for data analysis and reporting.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Test All | Experimental | Diagnostic Test: Test allMNCH, HIV, and TB clinic attendees are offered SARS-CoV-2 testing regardless of symptoms. |
| Screen and Test | No intervention | –Populations are screened and tested for SARS-CoV-2 according to the MOH testing guidelines model. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 2 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Age ≥ 2 years.
- Identified as SARS-CoV-2 positive during the study.
- Willing and able to provide informed consent or parental consent +/- assent for the study participation according to the national guidelines
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Significant medical or psychological condition that would preclude active study participation or ability to provide informed consent.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Test allIn the "test all" arm, SARS-CoV-2 infection screening questions will be administered to all clinic attendees followed by SARS-CoV-2 Ag-RDT testing irrespective of screening results. | Diagnostic test | Test All |
Primary outcome
SARS-CoV-2 case detection rate
Time frame: 6 months
Number of SARS-CoV-2 infections detected per 100 clinic attendees
Proportion of contacts tested for SARS-CoV2 infection
Time frame: 6 months
Number of contacts tested per 100 clinic attendees
Proportion of contacts identified with SARS-CoV-2 infection
Time frame: 6 months
Number of contacts testing positive for SARS-CoV2 infection as a proportion of the number contacts tested
4 secondary outcomes
Testing rates, linkage to care, disease progression, treatment and final outcome for SARS-CoV-2 infected patients
Time frame: 6 months
Linkage to care for SARS-CoV-2 infected patients
Time frame: 6 months
Disease progression, treatment and final outcome for SARS-CoV-2 infected patients
Time frame: 6 months
Feasibility and acceptability of integrating the model and the cost of the test-all versus screen-and-test models
Time frame: 6 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 11 Jan 2024.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 41190341Bhatt N, Masaba RO, Tchounga B, Yemaneberhan A, Simo L, Katcho TD, Ndimbii J, Siamba S, Mwancha-Kwasa C, Epee E, Zoung-Kanyi Bissek AC, Pearson S, Tiam A, Guay L, Machekano R. Integrating SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen testing in maternal, neonatal and child health, HIV and tuberculosis services in Cameroon and Kenya: a cluster randomised trial of two testing models. BMJ Public Health. 2025 Jul 13;2(Suppl 1):e000873. doi: 10.1136/bmjph-2023-000873. eCollection 2024 Jul.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 40599610Ndimbii J, Djikeussi T, Kana R, Siamba S, Machekano R, Bhatt N, Yemaneberhan A, Pearson S, Wanyama E, Mwancha-Kwasa C, Epee E, Tchounga B, Tiam A, Masaba RO. Assessing time requirements of two models of SARS-CoV-2 screening and testing in routine healthcare services in Kenya and Cameroon: a descriptive study. BMJ Public Health. 2025 Mar 22;2(Suppl 1):e001154. doi: 10.1136/bmjph-2024-001154. eCollection 2024 Jul.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. Anonymized participant data will be made available upon requests directed to the corresponding author. Proposals will be reviewed and approved by the sponsor, investigator, and collaborators on the basis of scientific merit. After approval of a proposal, data can be shared through a secure online platform after signing a data-sharing agreement. All data will be made available for a minimum of 3 years from the end of the trial.
Related trials for COVID-19
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Phase I Open-Label Safety Trial of Pembrolizumab for Neurological Post- Acute Sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 (PD1-PASC I)
Post-Acute COVID-19 Syndrome
Active, not recruitingPhase 1
A Safety and Immunogenicity Trial of OCU500, ChAd36 Vector Encoding SARS-CoV-2 Spike Vaccine Via Intranasal and Inhalational Routes in Previously Vaccinated Adults
COVID-19
Active, not recruiting
Intervention to Address Disparate Mental Health Consequences of COVID-19 Pandemic on Latinx and African Newcomers
Mental Health Issue, Mental Health Disorder
Recruiting
Home-Based Exercise Tele-Rehabilitation After COVID-19
Post SARS-CoV2 (COVID-19)
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
A Safety, Reactogenicity and Immunogenicity Trial of RVX-sCPD9 Booster Intranasal COVID-19 Vaccine
COVID -19
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Nilesh Bhatt, MD,MMed,PhD principal investigator
Elizabeth Glaser Pediatric AIDS Foundation
Boris Tchounga, MD, PhD principal investigator
Elizabeth Glaser Pediatric AIDS Foundation
Rose Otieno Masaba, MD, MSc principal investigator
Elizabeth Glaser Pediatric AIDS Foundation
2 sites in 2 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Test all in people with COVID-19, run by Elizabeth Glaser Pediatric AIDS Foundation at 2 sites in 2 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 Jan 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in Cameroon, Kenya. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
SARS-CoV-2 case detection rate (time frame: 6 months). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05382130, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 Jan 2024.