AzTrials
AzTrials

COVID-19INTEGRATENCT05382130

INTEGrating Ag-RDTs for COVID-19 in MNCH,HIV and TB Services in Cameroon and Kenya

A study testing Test all in people with COVID-19, run by Elizabeth Glaser Pediatric AIDS Foundation at 2 sites in 2 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Integration of antigen-detecting rapid diagnostic tests (Ag-RDT) for COVID-19 into services that provide care for vulnerable populations such as pregnant women, children, people with HIV infection, and patients with tuberculosis (TB) will identify more people with Coronavirus infection. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 2 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
COVID-19
What is being tested?
Test all
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
152,082 participants
Where
2 sitesin 2 countries
Study dates
17 May 2022to 31 Mar 2023
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 2 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Age ≥ 2 years.
  • Identified as SARS-CoV-2 positive during the study.
  • Willing and able to provide informed consent or parental consent +/- assent for the study participation according to the national guidelines

Who cannot join

  • Significant medical or psychological condition that would preclude active study participation or ability to provide informed consent.

Trial locations and contacts

2 sites in 2 countries.

2 sites in 2 countries

Cameroon1 site
  • Health facilities in Cameroon

    Yaoundé

Other trials in Cameroon

Kenya1 site
  • Health facilities in Kenya

    Nairobi

Other trials in Kenya

About this study

Official title: INTEGrating Rapid Antigen TEsting for SARS-CoV-2 in Maternal, Neonatal and Child Health, HIV and Tuberculosis Services in Cameroon and Kenya: A Cluster Randomized Trial of Two Models

Integration of antigen-detecting rapid diagnostic tests (Ag-RDT) for COVID-19 into services that provide care for vulnerable populations such as pregnant women, children, people with HIV infection, and patients with tuberculosis (TB) will identify more people with Coronavirus infection. This will allow for earlier treatment and tracing of contacts to decrease the spread of the coronavirus. This study is looking at two models for providing the testing in Maternal, Newborn and Child Health (MNCH), Tuberculosis (TB) and HIV clinics in Cameroon and Kenya. In some clinics, attendees with be screened for Coronavirus symptoms and history of exposure and if positive they will receive the rapid coronavirus test right in the clinic. In other facilities, all people attending the clinic with be provided with the coronavirus testing even if they screen negative to see how many people are infected but do not show any symptoms. Hospitalized and non-hospitalized patients with the coronavirus infection will be followed to document their illness and health outcomes. We will also ask health care workers about how well the testing in these clinics is working and what are some of their challenges, and collect information about the costs associated with both the models of testing.

Read the detailed description

Rationale: The use of simple, rapid and affordable antigen-detecting rapid diagnostic tests (Ag-RDT) to expand access to SARS-CoV-2 testing is being incorporated in many national COVID-19 response plans including Cameroon and Kenya. Targeting populations at high risk of COVID-19 disease, more severe outcomes, and onward transmission to other vulnerable populations such as pregnant women, people living with HIV, and patients with TB has the potential to mitigate the adverse effects of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Data on SARS-CoV-2 infection in these populations in Africa and the feasibility of integrating Ag-RDT within MNCH, HIV, and TB services are limited. Most current programs use a screen and test strategy to identify symptomatic infection and those at risk due to exposure because of the limited availability and costs of broader testing. However, this strategy does not identify those with asymptomatic infection who also contribute to the spread of SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Design: We will conduct a pragmatic cluster randomized trial to determine the SARS-CoV-2 case detection rate in facilities randomized to the standard "screen and test" model of SARS-CoV-2 Ag-RDT compared to a "test all" model of SARS-CoV-2 Ag-RDT in MNCH, HIV and TB clinics. We will describe clinical outcomes of SARS-CoV-2 infection and determine the feasibility and costs associated with each model. In each country, we propose to randomly allocate 10 purposively chosen facilities to the "test all" arm and standard of care arm in a 1:1 ratio. We plan to enroll at least 6000 patients per arm.

Screening and testing data on all individuals attending MNCH, TB and HIV clinics will be recorded in clinic records and captured into an electronic database that will be accessed for this study. SARS-CoV-2 positive patients will be followed prospectively to determine the SARS-CoV-2 cascade from testing, ascertainment of disease status, linkage to care, disease progression, to treatment and outcomes for hospitalized and non-hospitalized patients. Disease progression and outcome data will be collected through phone interviews from patients who are not hospitalized and through interview and medical record extraction for hospitalized patients. SARS-CoV-2 positive study participants will be given contact tracing and testing forms for their contacts, which will capture anonymous testing data when contacts access the Ag-RDT testing at the health facility.

The feasibility of the two models of integration will be captured through a structured questionnaire administered to health care workers and the collection of time-motion data to determine provider and patient time required to conduct the Ag-RDT testing. The service delivery costs of each model (such as personnel, training, equipment, tests, documentation) will be determined.

Outcomes: Primary outcomes include the SARS-CoV-2 case detection rates and the number/ proportion of contacts tested and diagnosed with SARS-CoV-2 infection. Secondary outcomes include testing rates, linkage to care, disease progression, treatment and final outcome for SARS-CoV-2 infected patients and the feasibility and cost of integration in the two models. The primary analysis will summarize SARS-CoV-2 detection rates and associated 95% confidence intervals for each facility. The overall case identification rates for each arm will be estimated using inverse variance weighted method to combine rates across facilities. The effect of the intervention and associated 95% confidence intervals will be estimated using Poisson regression and expressed as a relative risk. Lower 95% confidence interval limit above 1 will indicate significant increase in the case detection rates due to "test all" intervention. Additional sub group analyses will examine effects of the "test all" intervention across the different clinics and different countries. To account for potential clustering of outcomes by health facility, we will estimate robust standard errors in the regression models.

Duration: it is anticipated that study enrolment will take approximately 4 months with an additional 1 month to complete study follow-up, and 3-4 months for data analysis and reporting.

Conditions
COVID-19
Being tested
Test all
Keywords
Antigen rapid diagnostic test, Integration, COVID-19, Health Facilities, Africa
Medical subject headings
COVID-19

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Test allDiagnostic test

    In the "test all" arm, SARS-CoV-2 infection screening questions will be administered to all clinic attendees followed by SARS-CoV-2 Ag-RDT testing irrespective of screening results.

Study groups in NCT05382130
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Test AllExperimentalMNCH, HIV, and TB clinic attendees are offered SARS-CoV-2 testing regardless of symptoms.
Receives: Diagnostic Test: Test all
Screen and TestNo interventionPopulations are screened and tested for SARS-CoV-2 according to the MOH testing guidelines model.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. SARS-CoV-2 case detection rate

    Number of SARS-CoV-2 infections detected per 100 clinic attendees

    Measured: 6 months

  2. Proportion of contacts tested for SARS-CoV2 infection

    Number of contacts tested per 100 clinic attendees

    Measured: 6 months

  3. Proportion of contacts identified with SARS-CoV-2 infection

    Number of contacts testing positive for SARS-CoV2 infection as a proportion of the number contacts tested

    Measured: 6 months

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. Testing rates, linkage to care, disease progression, treatment and final outcome for SARS-CoV-2 infected patients

    Number of patients accepting (or refusing) testing divided by the total number of patients attending the 3 clinics

    Measured: 6 months

  2. Linkage to care for SARS-CoV-2 infected patients

    Number of SARS-CoV-2 positive patients linked to care and treatment divided by the number of SARS-CoV2 positive patients

    Measured: 6 months

  3. Disease progression, treatment and final outcome for SARS-CoV-2 infected patients

    Number of asymptomatic patients progressing to symptomatic disease and admission to hospital, divided by number asymptomatic patients Number of patients hospitalized for COVID-19 divided by the number of patients with COVID-19

    Measured: 6 months

  4. Feasibility and acceptability of integrating the model and the cost of the test-all versus screen-and-test models

    1. Health care provider perceptions of the feasibility and acceptability of integrating SARS-CoV-2 Ag-RDT in their clinics; the ability to provide service, speed of service delivery, and concerns or challenges on the feasibility and acceptability of integration;
    2. Effect of integration on health care providers and patients' time in clinic.
    3. Costs associated with implementation of the "test all" model compared to the "screen and test" model

    Measured: 6 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted19 May 2022
  2. Study start17 May 2022
  3. Primary completion31 Mar 2023
  4. Study completion31 Mar 2023

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
152,082 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05382130
Sponsor's protocol ID
EG0274
Acronym
INTEGRATE
Status last verified
Jan 2024
First submitted
17 May 2022
Last updated
11 Jan 2024
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: Anonymized participant data will be made available upon requests directed to the corresponding author. Proposals will be reviewed and approved by the sponsor, investigator, and collaborators on the basis of scientific merit. After approval of a proposal, data can be shared through a secure online platform after signing a data-sharing agreement. All data will be made available for a minimum of 3 years from the end of the trial.

Publications

  • Bhatt N, Masaba RO, Tchounga B, Yemaneberhan A, Simo L, Katcho TD, Ndimbii J, Siamba S, Mwancha-Kwasa C, Epee E, Zoung-Kanyi Bissek AC, Pearson S, Tiam A, Guay L, Machekano R. Integrating SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen testing in maternal, neonatal and child health, HIV and tuberculosis services in Cameroon and Kenya: a cluster randomised trial of two testing models. BMJ Public Health. 2025 Jul 13;2(Suppl 1):e000873. doi: 10.1136/bmjph-2023-000873. eCollection 2024 Jul.

    PubMed 41190341
  • Ndimbii J, Djikeussi T, Kana R, Siamba S, Machekano R, Bhatt N, Yemaneberhan A, Pearson S, Wanyama E, Mwancha-Kwasa C, Epee E, Tchounga B, Tiam A, Masaba RO. Assessing time requirements of two models of SARS-CoV-2 screening and testing in routine healthcare services in Kenya and Cameroon: a descriptive study. BMJ Public Health. 2025 Mar 22;2(Suppl 1):e001154. doi: 10.1136/bmjph-2024-001154. eCollection 2024 Jul.

    PubMed 40599610

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Test all in people with COVID-19, run by Elizabeth Glaser Pediatric AIDS Foundation at 2 sites in 2 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 Jan 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 2 sites in Cameroon, Kenya. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

SARS-CoV-2 case detection rate (time frame: 6 months). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05382130, which also lists 2 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 Jan 2024.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in