Laparoscopic-Roux-en-Y Gastric BypassBPG-1NCT05334173
Gastric Bypass With Different Lengths of the Bilipancreatic Limb
A study testing Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (RYGB) measuring the lengh of the common limb in people with Laparoscopic-Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass and Obesity, run by Hospital Universitario de Fuenlabrada at 3 sites in Spain.
Trial summary
Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (LRYGB) has been the most performed bariatric surgical intervention until a few years ago, due to its good results in terms of weight loss and remission of comorbidities such as hypertension, type 2 diabetes mellitus, dyslipidemia and obstructive sleep apnea syndrome. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Laparoscopic-Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass, Obesity, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
- What is being tested?
- Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (RYGB) measuring the lengh of the common limb
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 94 participants
- Where
- 3 sitesSpain
- Study dates
- 29 Jan 2019to 21 Sep 2026
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients with BMI 35-40 kg/m2 with associated medical problems (Diabetes Mellitus, Hipertension, Dyslipidemia, Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome) or 40-50 kg/m2 with or without associated medical problems, who comply with the regulatory rules for bariatric surgery in Spain (SECO and AEC)
Who cannot join
- General contraindications to kind of surgery
- BMI > 50 kg/m2
- Known drug or alcohol abuse
- ASA (American Society of Anesthesiology) physical status classification > III
- Inability to follow the procedures of the study
Trial locations and contacts
3 sites in 1 country.
Spain3 sites
Juan José Arroyo Martín
Denia, Alicante, 03700
Débora Acín Gándara
Fuenlabrada, Madrid, 28942
Esther Mans Muntwyler
Mataró, Barcelona, 08301
About this study
Official title: Randomized Clinical Trial on the Outcome of Gastric Bypass With Biliopancreatic and Alimentary Limbs of 150 Centimeters (cm)/70 cm Versus(vs) 70/150 cm, Measuring the Length of the Common Limb
Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (LRYGB) has been the most performed bariatric surgical intervention until a few years ago, due to its good results in terms of weight loss and remission of comorbidities such as hypertension, type 2 diabetes mellitus, dyslipidemia and obstructive sleep apnea syndrome. However, more than 25% of patients do not obtain the expected result.
There is no uniform technique to perform a LRYGB, but traditionally it was constructed using a long alimentary limb (AL) and a short biliopancreatic limb (BPL). There is no current consensus on the ideal length of the LRYGB limbs.
Read more
The distal gastric bypass at the expense of a longer biliopancreatic limb (LBPL-GB) could induce more excess of weight loss (EWL%), but with possible protein malnutrition depending on the length of the remaining common limb.
The aim of this study is compare a LBPL-GB (BPL 150cm, AL 70cm) with LAL-GB (BPL 70cm, AL 150cm).
PRIMARY OUTCOME: to evaluate if there are differences in weight loss. SECONDARY OUTCOME: to assess whether there are differences in both groups in remission of the most common comorbidities and in quality of life.
DESIGN: multicenter, prospective, randomized study in blocks (1:1), blinded for the patient and to the surgeon up to the time of intervention, in patients with indication of RYGB for obesity (BMI>35 with associated comorbidity or BMI>40 with or without comorbidity, excluding those of BMI>50). Intervention: LRYGB type 1 (LAL-GB: 150cm ALand 70cm BPL) or type 2 (LBPL-GB: 70cm AL and 150cm BPL).
The expected result is that the patients with LBPL-GB present better EWL%, and higher remission of their comorbidities than the comparison group
- Conditions
- Laparoscopic-Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass, Obesity, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Hypertension, Dyslipidemias, Sleep Apnea
- Being tested
- Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (RYGB) measuring the lengh of the common limb
- Keywords
- Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Hypertension, Dyslipidemia, Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome, Quality of life, Nutritional deficit, Laparoscopic-Roux-en-Y-Gastric-Bypass, Biliopancreatic limb, Alimentary limb, Common limb
- Medical subject headings
- Obesity, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Hypertension, Dyslipidemias, Sleep Apnea Syndromes, Sleep Apnea, Obstructive
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (RYGB) measuring the lengh of the common limbProcedure or surgery
Also called Biliopancreatic and alimentary limbs of 150cm / 70cm, Biliopancreatic and alimentary limbs of 70cm / 150cm
The patients are randomized to Type 1 laparoscopic RYGB (150cm alimentary limb and 70cm biliopancreatic limb) or type 2 laparoscopic RYGB (70cm alimentary limb and 150cm biliopancreatic limb). In both groups, the total intestinal length is measured to determine the size of the common limb. We introduce a 10 cm ruler into the abdominal cavity to measure the bowel and then extract it. LRYGB is made with linear stapler anastomosis.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| RYGB TYPE 1 - LONGER ALIMENTARY LIMB (LAL-GB) | Active comparator | 150 cm alimentary limb and 70 cm biliopancreatic limb Receives: Procedure: Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (RYGB) measuring the lengh of the common limb |
| RYGB TYPE 2 - LONGER BILIOPANCREATIC LIMB (LBPL-GB) | Active comparator | 70 cm alimentary limb and 150 cm biliopancreatic limb Receives: Procedure: Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (RYGB) measuring the lengh of the common limb |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Excess Weight Loss (%EWL)
The Excess Weight Loss (%EWL) after surgery. (Preoperatory weight in kilograms - current weight in kilograms) / (preoperatory weight in kilograms) x 100
Measured: From baseline to five years after surgery
Secondary outcomes (4)
Remission or improvement of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
Remission or improvement of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus after surgery, according to the Criteria of American Diabetes Association, Spanish Obesity Surgery Society and Spanish Surgeon Association.
Complete remission: HbA1c < 6% and normalization of fasting blood glucose (100 mg/dl) without medication during one year minimum. Partial remission: HbA1c 6-6.5% and fasting blood glucose between 100 and 125 mg/dl) without medication.
Prolonged remission: at least 5 years of remission. Improvement HbA1c < 7%, with pharmacological treatment. ADA criteria (American Diabetes Association)
Measured: From baseline to five years after surgery
Remission or improvement of Hypertension
Remission or improvement of Hypertension after surgery, according to the Criteria of the Spanish Obesity Surgery Society and Spanish Surgeon Association.
Complete remission: blood pressure (BP) <120/80 without medication Partial remission: systolic BP 120-140 mmHg and diastolic BP 80-89 mmHg without medication.
Measured: From baseline to five years after surgery
Remission of improvement of Dyslipidemia
Remission or improvement of Dyslipidemia after surgery, according to the Criteria of the Spanish Obesity Surgery Society and Spanish Surgeon Association.
Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDLc) < 100 mg/dl, Triglycerides (TG) < 150 mg/dl, total cholesterol < 200 mg/dl, High-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDLc) > 60 mg/dl.
Measured: From baseline to five years after surgery
Remission or improvement of Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome
Remission or improvement of Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome after surgery, according to the Criteria of the Spanish Obesity Surgery Society and Spanish Surgeon Association.
Number of apneic-hypopneic episodes/hour, recorded by polysomnography.
Measured: From baseline to five years after surgery
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted19 Apr 2022
- Study start29 Jan 2019
- Primary completion11 Oct 2024 (estimated)
- Study completion21 Sep 2026 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Laparoscopic-Roux-en-Y Gastric BypassStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Randomized trial in blocks (1:1). Type 1 laparoscopic Gastric Bypass (150cm alimentary limb and 70cm biliopancreatic limb) or type 2 laparoscopic Gastric Bypass (70cm alimentary limb and 150cm biliopancreatic limb)
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 94 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Hospital Universitario de Fuenlabrada
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Spanish Association of Surgeons (AEC)
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Débora Acín, Hospital Universitario de Fuenlabrada
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05334173
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- BPG-1
- Acronym
- BPG-1
- Status last verified
- Oct 2023
- First submitted
- 19 Mar 2022
- Last updated
- 17 Oct 2023
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 17 Oct 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Randomized Clinical Trial on the Outcome of Gastric Bypass With Biliopancreatic and Alimentary Limbs of 150 Centimeters (cm)/70 cm Versus(vs) 70/150 cm, Measuring the Length of the Common Limb
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05334173
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- BPG-1 / BPG-1
- Conditions
- Laparoscopic-Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass, Obesity, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Hypertension, Dyslipidemias, Sleep Apnea
- Keywords
- Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Hypertension, Dyslipidemia, Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome, Quality of life, Nutritional deficit, Laparoscopic-Roux-en-Y-Gastric-Bypass, Biliopancreatic limb
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 94 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Hospital Universitario de FuenlabradaUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Spanish Association of Surgeons (AEC)
- Study start
- 29 Jan 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 11 Oct 2024 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 21 Sep 2026 (estimated)
- First posted
- 19 Apr 2022 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (LRYGB) has been the most performed bariatric surgical intervention until a few years ago, due to its good results in terms of weight loss and remission of comorbidities such as hypertension, type 2 diabetes mellitus, dyslipidemia and obstructive sleep apnea syndrome. However, more than 25% of patients do not obtain the expected result.
There is no uniform technique to perform a LRYGB, but traditionally it was constructed using a long alimentary limb (AL) and a short biliopancreatic limb (BPL). There is no current consensus on the ideal length of the LRYGB limbs.
The distal gastric bypass at the expense of a longer biliopancreatic limb (LBPL-GB) could induce more excess of weight loss (EWL%), but with possible protein malnutrition depending on the length of the remaining common limb.
The aim of this study is compare a LBPL-GB (BPL 150cm, AL 70cm) with LAL-GB (BPL 70cm, AL 150cm).
PRIMARY OUTCOME: to evaluate if there are differences in weight loss. SECONDARY OUTCOME: to assess whether there are differences in both groups in remission of the most common comorbidities and in quality of life.
DESIGN: multicenter, prospective, randomized study in blocks (1:1), blinded for the patient and to the surgeon up to the time of intervention, in patients with indication of RYGB for obesity (BMI>35 with associated comorbidity or BMI>40 with or without comorbidity, excluding those of BMI>50). Intervention: LRYGB type 1 (LAL-GB: 150cm ALand 70cm BPL) or type 2 (LBPL-GB: 70cm AL and 150cm BPL).
The expected result is that the patients with LBPL-GB present better EWL%, and higher remission of their comorbidities than the comparison group
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Randomized trial in blocks (1:1). Type 1 laparoscopic Gastric Bypass (150cm alimentary limb and 70cm biliopancreatic limb) or type 2 laparoscopic Gastric Bypass (70cm alimentary limb and 150cm biliopancreatic limb)
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| RYGB TYPE 1 - LONGER ALIMENTARY LIMB (LAL-GB) | Active comparator | Procedure: Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (RYGB) measuring the lengh of the common limb150 cm alimentary limb and 70 cm biliopancreatic limb |
| RYGB TYPE 2 - LONGER BILIOPANCREATIC LIMB (LBPL-GB) | Active comparator | Procedure: Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (RYGB) measuring the lengh of the common limb70 cm alimentary limb and 150 cm biliopancreatic limb |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 65 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Patients with BMI 35-40 kg/m2 with associated medical problems (Diabetes Mellitus, Hipertension, Dyslipidemia, Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome) or 40-50 kg/m2 with or without associated medical problems, who comply with the regulatory rules for bariatric surgery in Spain (SECO and AEC)
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- General contraindications to kind of surgery
- BMI > 50 kg/m2
- Known drug or alcohol abuse
- ASA (American Society of Anesthesiology) physical status classification > III
- Inability to follow the procedures of the study
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (RYGB) measuring the lengh of the common limbAlso: Biliopancreatic and alimentary limbs of 150cm / 70cm, Biliopancreatic and alimentary limbs of 70cm / 150cmThe patients are randomized to Type 1 laparoscopic RYGB (150cm alimentary limb and 70cm biliopancreatic limb) or type 2 laparoscopic RYGB (70cm alimentary limb and 150cm biliopancreatic limb). In both groups, the total intestinal length is measured to determine the size of the common limb. We introduce a 10 cm ruler into the abdominal cavity to measure the bowel and then extract it. LRYGB is made with linear stapler anastomosis. | Procedure or surgery | RYGB TYPE 1 - LONGER ALIMENTARY LIMB (LAL-GB), RYGB TYPE 2 - LONGER BILIOPANCREATIC LIMB (LBPL-GB) |
Primary outcome
Excess Weight Loss (%EWL)
Time frame: From baseline to five years after surgery
The Excess Weight Loss (%EWL) after surgery. (Preoperatory weight in kilograms - current weight in kilograms) / (preoperatory weight in kilograms) x 100
4 secondary outcomes
Remission or improvement of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
Time frame: From baseline to five years after surgery
Remission or improvement of Hypertension
Time frame: From baseline to five years after surgery
Remission of improvement of Dyslipidemia
Time frame: From baseline to five years after surgery
Remission or improvement of Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome
Time frame: From baseline to five years after surgery
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 17 Oct 2023.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Laparoscopic-Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass
Recruiting
Comparison of Hormonal Response to a Mixed-Meal Tolerance Test After Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Versus Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy With Duodenojejunal Bypass in Patients With Super Morbid Obesity
Bariatric Surgery, Hormonal Response
Not yet recruitingPhase 4
Swap Anesthetic Versus Continuous Desflurane in Adults Undergoing Bariatric Surgery
Obesity, Bariatric Surgery
RecruitingPhase 4
The Bioavailability and Effect on Pouch pH of Esomeprazole After Gastric Bypass
Obesity, Gastric Reflux
Recruiting
Binge Eating, Depression and Anxiety Outcomes After Sleeve Gastrectomy Versus Gastric Bypass: A Cohort Study
Obesity
Recruiting
Comparing Revisional Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Versus Ringed Revisional Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass After Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy
Revisional Bariatric Surgery
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
3 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (RYGB) measuring the lengh of the common limb in people with Laparoscopic-Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass and Obesity, run by Hospital Universitario de Fuenlabrada at 3 sites in Spain.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Oct 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 3 sites in Spain. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Excess Weight Loss (%EWL) (time frame: From baseline to five years after surgery). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Oct 2023.