Older AdultsPROFITNCT05319145
PeRsonalizing the Approach to the Oncologic Frail Individual Through Tailored Assessment and Intervention (PROFIT Study)
A study testing Intervention group in people with Older Adults and Gastro-Intestinal Cancer, run by Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron Research Institute at 3 sites in 2 countries.
Trial summary
The PROFIT study has two complementary aims. The first aim is to compare, in a cohort study enrolling N=257 older adults (>65 years) with lung, gastrointestinal and prostate cancer, different easy measures of frailty (Geriatric 8 questionnaire (G8), Short physical Performance Battery (SPPB) and the IF-VIG), testing… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 65 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Older Adults, Gastro-Intestinal Cancer, Prostate Cancer
- What is being tested?
- Intervention group
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 268 participants
- Where
- 3 sitesin 2 countries
- Study dates
- 1 May 2022to 31 Jan 2023
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 65 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Older adult
Who may be able to join
- 1) Older adults (≥65 years) 2) Diagnosed with solid tumors (specifically, prostate, lung, colon, rectal, hepatic-biliary, pancreatic, and esophagus-gastric cancers), an extension of T2, T3, T4, involving or not lymph nodes, and either metastatic or not (M0-1), who might or might not underwent onco-specific treatments or await for new treatments 3) Evidence of functional impact (ECOG≥2) but overall maintained functional status (Barthel≥50) 4) Life expectancy ≥3 months 5) Patients with mild-moderate frailty (G8<14) 5) Willing to provide informed consent to participate.
Who cannot join
- 1) Participants with moderate-severe cognitive impairment (Reisberg's Global Deterioration Scale ≥5).
Trial locations and contacts
3 sites in 2 countries.
3 sites in 2 countries
Spain2 sites
Parc Sanitari Pere Virgili - Vall d'Hebron Institut de Recerca
Barcelona, 08035
NavarraBiomed
Pamplona, Navarre, 31008
Andorra1 site
Servei Andorrà d'Atenció Sanitària
Andorra la Vella, Andorra, AD500
About this study
The PROFIT study has two complementary aims. The first aim is to compare, in a cohort study enrolling N=257 older adults (>65 years) with lung, gastrointestinal and prostate cancer, different easy measures of frailty (Geriatric 8 questionnaire (G8), Short physical Performance Battery (SPPB) and the IF-VIG), testing their ability to predict survival, functional status (ECOG, Barthel Index), quality of life (EuroQol5D) and resources utilization (visits, hospital admissions, treatments) at 3, 6 and 12 months. The second aim, which motivates the registration in ClinicalTrials.gov, is to conduct a randomized controlled trial (RCT) enrolling N=134 patients per group, with similar characteristics to those enrolled for aim 1, but with mild-moderate frailty (G8≤14 points); we will compare a multi-component CGA-based intervention including physical exercise and nutritional recommendations with usual care, measuring the impact on the same outcomes as for aim 1, at 3 and 6 months. The use of ad hoc eHealth solutions (App/platform for exercise) will foster patients' empowerment and sustainability of the intervention. We will also assess patients, caregivers, and professionals' experience with the intervention through focus groups. Participants will be recruited from outpatients and from post-acute care units.
Read the detailed description
The impact of the aging of population on cancer incidence and consequences is clear: in very few years, more than 50% of older adults will be diagnosed with malignant tumors, with a relevant increase in mortality compared to younger adults, and a dramatic burden of disability. Many of these patients will be potential candidates for oncospecific treatments, either curative, adjuvants or palliative. Despite this scenario, many trials on cancers still exclude patients based on their age or set survival and treatments' toxicity as the main outcomes, neglecting other meaningful outcomes such as functional status or quality of life. Therefore, clinical decisions regarding this specific population are not always based on real-life data. Moreover, older adults are a highly heterogeneous population, based on clinical, functional, and psychosocial aspects. This is why, in such a population group, the individualization of treatments is pivotal.
Frailty has been proposed as a better marker of biological age than chronological age. This concept indicates a reversible state of risk of increased vulnerability to external or internal stressors, exposing the patients to a higher risk of adverse events, including disability and mortality. However, there is no agreement on the most suitable frailty tools to be used in practice. In older adults with cancer, frailty, which is easily measured in any setting through quick clinical scales, could be an ideal trigger to select candidate patients for a subsequent more extensive comprehensive geriatric assessment (onwards, CGA) and potential interventions. Among these interventions, multi-component approaches including physical exercise and nutritional recommendations have shown a positive impact on both mortality and functional status in patients with different cancers and could be proposed for either pre-habilitation or re-habilitation in older cancer patients with mild-moderate frailty.
Considering these premises, the PROFIT study has two complementary aims. The first aim is to compare, in a cohort study enrolling N=257 older adults (>65 years) with lung, gastrointestinal and prostate cancer, different easy measures of frailty (Geriatric 8 questionnaire (G8), Short physical Performance Battery (SPPB) and the IF-VIG), testing their ability to predict survival, functional status (ECOG, Barthel Index), quality of life (EuroQol5D) and resources utilization (visits, hospital admissions, treatments) at 3, 6 and 12 months. The second aim is to conduct a randomized controlled trial (RCT) enrolling N=134 patients per group, with similar characteristics to those enrolled for aim 1, but with mild-moderate frailty (G8≤14 points); we will compare a multi-component CGA-based intervention including physical exercise and nutritional recommendations with usual care, measuring the impact on the same outcomes as for aim 1, at 3 and 6 months. The use of ad hoc eHealth solutions (App/platform for exercise) will foster patients' empowerment and sustainability of the intervention. We will also assess patients, caregivers, and professionals' experience with the intervention through focus groups. Participants will be recruited from outpatients and from post-acute care units.
The PROFIT study will add relevant evidence for the management of older cancer patients. The impact, for the individual and the society, is high, in light of the aging of the population: the results will allow providing oncologists and other professionals with tools to improve the personalization of treatments, to finally provide adequate and tailored care programs. This might contribute to avoid the exclusion of patients who could benefit from active treatments and, on the other hand, reducing overtreatment for those who will likely not benefit from it. The clinical trial will also provide information on the most suitable content and on the impact of an intervention aimed at strengthening the functional status and improving the quality of life in older cancer patients with mild-moderate frailty, who might be potential candidates for subsequent onco-specific treatments. The project will also deliver adapted materials and eHealth solutions to be potentially scaled up for this profile of users, as a benefit for the society even beyond this project.
- Conditions
- Older Adults, Gastro-Intestinal Cancer, Prostate Cancer, Lung Cancer, Frail Elderly Syndrome
- Being tested
- Intervention group, Control group
- Medical subject headings
- Prostatic Neoplasms, Lung Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Intervention groupBehavioural
Also called Tailored multidisciplinary intervention based on CGA, focused on a multicomponent physical exercise program with nutritional recommendations.
- Multi-component exercise intervention program based on Vivifrail©. It consists of 1 daily-30 minutes session, twice a week, for 10 consecutive weeks supervised by an experienced exercise specialist. Exercises (resistance, gait retraining, balance training) are personalized depending on the person's functional capacity (evaluated by the SPPB and a walking speed test) and the risk of falling. Between sessions, individual, unsupervised training by the own patient, supported in the case by the caregiver, will be stimulated, through the recommendations of ViviFrail©. 2) Nutrition. Personalized recommendations according to nutritional and medical status (active oncologic treatment, remission, or palliative stage) will be offered according to the ESPEN recommendations for cancer patients, aimed at compensating for inadequate energy intake, improving patients' malnutrition risk stage (assessed by means of the MNA-SF).
Control groupOther
Also called Health psycho-education
General recommendations (written and videos) will be offered.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Control group | Active comparator | Treatment as usual. Mainly based on standard physical rehabilitation. Receives: Other: Control group |
| Intervention group | Experimental | Based on the results of the CGA, a tailored multidisciplinary intervention will be proposed, focused on a multicomponent physical exercise program with nutritional recommendations. Receives: Behavioral: Intervention group |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB)
Change in physical function, measured by the difference on SPPB between follow-ups, hand grip and maximum resistance.
Measured: Pre-intervention (baseline) and post-intervention at follow-ups (at 3, 6, and 12 months)
Secondary outcomes (10)
Barthel
Functional status and disability
Measured: Pre-intervention (baseline) and post-intervention at follow-ups (at 3, 6, and 12 months)
ECOG
Functional status and disability
Measured: Pre-intervention (baseline) and post-intervention at follow-ups (at 3, 6, and 12 months)
EQoL-5D
Quality of life
Measured: Pre-intervention (baseline) and post-intervention at follow-ups (at 3, 6, and 12 months)
Edmonton Symptom Assessment System
Intensity of specific symptoms related to cancer
Measured: Pre-intervention (baseline) and post-intervention at follow-ups (at 3, 6, and 12 months)
Falls (yes vs. no & number of events)
Potential adverse effects of the intervention
Measured: Pre-intervention (baseline) and post-intervention at follow-ups (at 3, 6, and 12 months)
Fractures (yes vs. no & number of events)
Potential adverse effects of the intervention
Measured: Pre-intervention (baseline) and post-intervention at follow-ups (at 3, 6, and 12 months)
Pain (0-10 VAS)
Potential adverse effects of the intervention
Measured: Pre-intervention (baseline) and post-intervention at follow-ups (at 3, 6, and 12 months)
Cardiovascular events (yes vs. no & number of events)
Collecting ocurrence of angina, myocardial infarction, TIA and/or stroke
Measured: Pre-intervention (baseline) and post-intervention at follow-ups (at 3, 6, and 12 months)
Readmissions to the acute hospital
Potential adverse effects
Measured: Post-intervention at follow-ups (at 3, 6, and 12 months)
Days spent at home (number of days)
Related to process \& resources utilization
Measured: Post-intervention at follow-ups (at 3, 6, and 12 months)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted8 Apr 2022
- Study start1 May 2022 (estimated)
- Primary completion1 Dec 2022 (estimated)
- Study completion31 Jan 2023 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Older AdultsStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron Research InstituteThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 268 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Servicio de Geriatría Complejo Hospitalario de Navarra (CHN), Fundación Miguel Servet - Navarrabiomed, Hospital de la Ribera, Alzira, Valencia, Institut Català d'Oncologia ICO Girona, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology, Servei Andorrà d'Atenció Sanitària (SAAS), Andorra, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05319145
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- PROFIT Study
- Acronym
- PROFIT
- Status last verified
- Apr 2022
- First submitted
- 31 Mar 2022
- Last updated
- 13 Apr 2022
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 13 Apr 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- PeRsonalizing the Approach to the Oncologic Frail Individual Through Tailored Assessment and Intervention (PROFIT Study)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05319145
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- PROFIT / PROFIT Study
- Conditions
- Older Adults, Gastro-Intestinal Cancer, Prostate Cancer, Lung Cancer, Frail Elderly Syndrome
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 268 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron Research InstituteUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Servicio de Geriatría Complejo Hospitalario de Navarra (CHN), Fundación Miguel Servet - Navarrabiomed, Hospital de la Ribera, Alzira, Valencia, Institut Català d'Oncologia ICO Girona, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology, Servei Andorrà d'Atenció Sanitària (SAAS), Andorra, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS
- Study start
- 1 May 2022 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- 1 Dec 2022 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 31 Jan 2023 (estimated)
- First posted
- 8 Apr 2022 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The PROFIT study has two complementary aims. The first aim is to compare, in a cohort study enrolling N=257 older adults (>65 years) with lung, gastrointestinal and prostate cancer, different easy measures of frailty (Geriatric 8 questionnaire (G8), Short physical Performance Battery (SPPB) and the IF-VIG), testing their ability to predict survival, functional status (ECOG, Barthel Index), quality of life (EuroQol5D) and resources utilization (visits, hospital admissions, treatments) at 3, 6 and 12 months. The second aim, which motivates the registration in ClinicalTrials.gov, is to conduct a randomized controlled trial (RCT) enrolling N=134 patients per group, with similar characteristics to those enrolled for aim 1, but with mild-moderate frailty (G8≤14 points); we will compare a multi-component CGA-based intervention including physical exercise and nutritional recommendations with usual care, measuring the impact on the same outcomes as for aim 1, at 3 and 6 months. The use of ad hoc eHealth solutions (App/platform for exercise) will foster patients' empowerment and sustainability of the intervention. We will also assess patients, caregivers, and professionals' experience with the intervention through focus groups. Participants will be recruited from outpatients and from post-acute care units.
Detailed description
The impact of the aging of population on cancer incidence and consequences is clear: in very few years, more than 50% of older adults will be diagnosed with malignant tumors, with a relevant increase in mortality compared to younger adults, and a dramatic burden of disability. Many of these patients will be potential candidates for oncospecific treatments, either curative, adjuvants or palliative. Despite this scenario, many trials on cancers still exclude patients based on their age or set survival and treatments' toxicity as the main outcomes, neglecting other meaningful outcomes such as functional status or quality of life. Therefore, clinical decisions regarding this specific population are not always based on real-life data. Moreover, older adults are a highly heterogeneous population, based on clinical, functional, and psychosocial aspects. This is why, in such a population group, the individualization of treatments is pivotal.
Frailty has been proposed as a better marker of biological age than chronological age. This concept indicates a reversible state of risk of increased vulnerability to external or internal stressors, exposing the patients to a higher risk of adverse events, including disability and mortality. However, there is no agreement on the most suitable frailty tools to be used in practice. In older adults with cancer, frailty, which is easily measured in any setting through quick clinical scales, could be an ideal trigger to select candidate patients for a subsequent more extensive comprehensive geriatric assessment (onwards, CGA) and potential interventions. Among these interventions, multi-component approaches including physical exercise and nutritional recommendations have shown a positive impact on both mortality and functional status in patients with different cancers and could be proposed for either pre-habilitation or re-habilitation in older cancer patients with mild-moderate frailty.
Considering these premises, the PROFIT study has two complementary aims. The first aim is to compare, in a cohort study enrolling N=257 older adults (>65 years) with lung, gastrointestinal and prostate cancer, different easy measures of frailty (Geriatric 8 questionnaire (G8), Short physical Performance Battery (SPPB) and the IF-VIG), testing their ability to predict survival, functional status (ECOG, Barthel Index), quality of life (EuroQol5D) and resources utilization (visits, hospital admissions, treatments) at 3, 6 and 12 months. The second aim is to conduct a randomized controlled trial (RCT) enrolling N=134 patients per group, with similar characteristics to those enrolled for aim 1, but with mild-moderate frailty (G8≤14 points); we will compare a multi-component CGA-based intervention including physical exercise and nutritional recommendations with usual care, measuring the impact on the same outcomes as for aim 1, at 3 and 6 months. The use of ad hoc eHealth solutions (App/platform for exercise) will foster patients' empowerment and sustainability of the intervention. We will also assess patients, caregivers, and professionals' experience with the intervention through focus groups. Participants will be recruited from outpatients and from post-acute care units.
The PROFIT study will add relevant evidence for the management of older cancer patients. The impact, for the individual and the society, is high, in light of the aging of the population: the results will allow providing oncologists and other professionals with tools to improve the personalization of treatments, to finally provide adequate and tailored care programs. This might contribute to avoid the exclusion of patients who could benefit from active treatments and, on the other hand, reducing overtreatment for those who will likely not benefit from it. The clinical trial will also provide information on the most suitable content and on the impact of an intervention aimed at strengthening the functional status and improving the quality of life in older cancer patients with mild-moderate frailty, who might be potential candidates for subsequent onco-specific treatments. The project will also deliver adapted materials and eHealth solutions to be potentially scaled up for this profile of users, as a benefit for the society even beyond this project.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, care provider, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Control group | Active comparator | Other: Control groupTreatment as usual. Mainly based on standard physical rehabilitation. |
| Intervention group | Experimental | Behavioral: Intervention groupBased on the results of the CGA, a tailored multidisciplinary intervention will be proposed, focused on a multicomponent physical exercise program with nutritional recommendations. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 65 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- 1) Older adults (≥65 years) 2) Diagnosed with solid tumors (specifically, prostate, lung, colon, rectal, hepatic-biliary, pancreatic, and esophagus-gastric cancers), an extension of T2, T3, T4, involving or not lymph nodes, and either metastatic or not (M0-1), who might or might not underwent onco-specific treatments or await for new treatments 3) Evidence of functional impact (ECOG≥2) but overall maintained functional status (Barthel≥50) 4) Life expectancy ≥3 months 5) Patients with mild-moderate frailty (G8<14) 5) Willing to provide informed consent to participate.
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- 1) Participants with moderate-severe cognitive impairment (Reisberg's Global Deterioration Scale ≥5).
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention groupAlso: Tailored multidisciplinary intervention based on CGA, focused on a multicomponent physical exercise program with nutritional recommendations.1) Multi-component exercise intervention program based on Vivifrail©. It consists of 1 daily-30 minutes session, twice a week, for 10 consecutive weeks supervised by an experienced exercise specialist. Exercises (resistance, gait retraining, balance training) are personalized depending on the person's functional capacity (evaluated by the SPPB and a walking speed test) and the risk of falling. Between sessions, individual, unsupervised training by the own patient, supported in the case by the caregiver, will be stimulated, through the recommendations of ViviFrail©. 2) Nutrition. Personalized recommendations according to nutritional and medical status (active oncologic treatment, remission, or palliative stage) will be offered according to the ESPEN recommendations for cancer patients, aimed at compensating for inadequate energy intake, improving patients' malnutrition risk stage (assessed by means of the MNA-SF). | Behavioural | Intervention group |
| Control groupAlso: Health psycho-educationGeneral recommendations (written and videos) will be offered. | Other | Control group |
Primary outcome
Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB)
Time frame: Pre-intervention (baseline) and post-intervention at follow-ups (at 3, 6, and 12 months)
Change in physical function, measured by the difference on SPPB between follow-ups, hand grip and maximum resistance.
10 secondary outcomes
Barthel
Time frame: Pre-intervention (baseline) and post-intervention at follow-ups (at 3, 6, and 12 months)
ECOG
Time frame: Pre-intervention (baseline) and post-intervention at follow-ups (at 3, 6, and 12 months)
EQoL-5D
Time frame: Pre-intervention (baseline) and post-intervention at follow-ups (at 3, 6, and 12 months)
Edmonton Symptom Assessment System
Time frame: Pre-intervention (baseline) and post-intervention at follow-ups (at 3, 6, and 12 months)
Falls (yes vs. no & number of events)
Time frame: Pre-intervention (baseline) and post-intervention at follow-ups (at 3, 6, and 12 months)
Fractures (yes vs. no & number of events)
Time frame: Pre-intervention (baseline) and post-intervention at follow-ups (at 3, 6, and 12 months)
Pain (0-10 VAS)
Time frame: Pre-intervention (baseline) and post-intervention at follow-ups (at 3, 6, and 12 months)
Cardiovascular events (yes vs. no & number of events)
Time frame: Pre-intervention (baseline) and post-intervention at follow-ups (at 3, 6, and 12 months)
Readmissions to the acute hospital
Time frame: Post-intervention at follow-ups (at 3, 6, and 12 months)
Days spent at home (number of days)
Time frame: Post-intervention at follow-ups (at 3, 6, and 12 months)
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 13 Apr 2022.
Related trials for Older Adults
Recruiting
Colon-delivered Riboflavin and Gut Microbiota Composition
Microbiome Dysbiosis, Gut Health
Not yet recruiting
Bispectral Index-Guided Propofol Sedation During Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography
Deep Sedation, Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography
Not yet recruiting
Expanded Diagnostic Strategy in Older Adults Hospitalized With Community-Acquired Acute Respiratory Infection
Acute Respiratory Infection
RecruitingObservational study
Effects of Obesity on Physical Abilities and Daily Living Activities in Elderly Adults
Obesity, Sarcopenic Obesity
RecruitingPhase 2
Testing New Therapies for Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia Who Are Newly Diagnosed and Have Not Yet Started Treatment (A MyeloMATCH Treatment Trial)
Acute Myeloid Leukemia, Acute Myeloid Leukemia Arising From Previous Myelodysplastic/Myeloproliferative Neoplasm
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
3 sites in 2 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Intervention group in people with Older Adults and Gastro-Intestinal Cancer, run by Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron Research Institute at 3 sites in 2 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Apr 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 3 sites in Spain, Andorra. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) (time frame: Pre-intervention (baseline) and post-intervention at follow-ups (at 3, 6, and 12 months)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Apr 2022.