AzTrials
AzTrials

Older AdultsPROFITNCT05319145

PeRsonalizing the Approach to the Oncologic Frail Individual Through Tailored Assessment and Intervention (PROFIT Study)

A study testing Intervention group in people with Older Adults and Gastro-Intestinal Cancer, run by Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron Research Institute at 3 sites in 2 countries.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The PROFIT study has two complementary aims. The first aim is to compare, in a cohort study enrolling N=257 older adults (>65 years) with lung, gastrointestinal and prostate cancer, different easy measures of frailty (Geriatric 8 questionnaire (G8), Short physical Performance Battery (SPPB) and the IF-VIG), testing… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 65 years and older
What is being tested?
Intervention group
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
268 participants
Where
3 sitesin 2 countries
Study dates
1 May 2022to 31 Jan 2023
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 65 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • 1) Older adults (≥65 years) 2) Diagnosed with solid tumors (specifically, prostate, lung, colon, rectal, hepatic-biliary, pancreatic, and esophagus-gastric cancers), an extension of T2, T3, T4, involving or not lymph nodes, and either metastatic or not (M0-1), who might or might not underwent onco-specific treatments or await for new treatments 3) Evidence of functional impact (ECOG≥2) but overall maintained functional status (Barthel≥50) 4) Life expectancy ≥3 months 5) Patients with mild-moderate frailty (G8<14) 5) Willing to provide informed consent to participate.

Who cannot join

  • 1) Participants with moderate-severe cognitive impairment (Reisberg's Global Deterioration Scale ≥5).

Trial locations and contacts

3 sites in 2 countries.

3 sites in 2 countries

Spain2 sites
  • Parc Sanitari Pere Virgili - Vall d'Hebron Institut de Recerca

    Barcelona, 08035

  • NavarraBiomed

    Pamplona, Navarre, 31008

Other trials in Spain

Andorra1 site
  • Servei Andorrà d'Atenció Sanitària

    Andorra la Vella, Andorra, AD500

About this study

The PROFIT study has two complementary aims. The first aim is to compare, in a cohort study enrolling N=257 older adults (>65 years) with lung, gastrointestinal and prostate cancer, different easy measures of frailty (Geriatric 8 questionnaire (G8), Short physical Performance Battery (SPPB) and the IF-VIG), testing their ability to predict survival, functional status (ECOG, Barthel Index), quality of life (EuroQol5D) and resources utilization (visits, hospital admissions, treatments) at 3, 6 and 12 months. The second aim, which motivates the registration in ClinicalTrials.gov, is to conduct a randomized controlled trial (RCT) enrolling N=134 patients per group, with similar characteristics to those enrolled for aim 1, but with mild-moderate frailty (G8≤14 points); we will compare a multi-component CGA-based intervention including physical exercise and nutritional recommendations with usual care, measuring the impact on the same outcomes as for aim 1, at 3 and 6 months. The use of ad hoc eHealth solutions (App/platform for exercise) will foster patients' empowerment and sustainability of the intervention. We will also assess patients, caregivers, and professionals' experience with the intervention through focus groups. Participants will be recruited from outpatients and from post-acute care units.

Read the detailed description

The impact of the aging of population on cancer incidence and consequences is clear: in very few years, more than 50% of older adults will be diagnosed with malignant tumors, with a relevant increase in mortality compared to younger adults, and a dramatic burden of disability. Many of these patients will be potential candidates for oncospecific treatments, either curative, adjuvants or palliative. Despite this scenario, many trials on cancers still exclude patients based on their age or set survival and treatments' toxicity as the main outcomes, neglecting other meaningful outcomes such as functional status or quality of life. Therefore, clinical decisions regarding this specific population are not always based on real-life data. Moreover, older adults are a highly heterogeneous population, based on clinical, functional, and psychosocial aspects. This is why, in such a population group, the individualization of treatments is pivotal.

Frailty has been proposed as a better marker of biological age than chronological age. This concept indicates a reversible state of risk of increased vulnerability to external or internal stressors, exposing the patients to a higher risk of adverse events, including disability and mortality. However, there is no agreement on the most suitable frailty tools to be used in practice. In older adults with cancer, frailty, which is easily measured in any setting through quick clinical scales, could be an ideal trigger to select candidate patients for a subsequent more extensive comprehensive geriatric assessment (onwards, CGA) and potential interventions. Among these interventions, multi-component approaches including physical exercise and nutritional recommendations have shown a positive impact on both mortality and functional status in patients with different cancers and could be proposed for either pre-habilitation or re-habilitation in older cancer patients with mild-moderate frailty.

Considering these premises, the PROFIT study has two complementary aims. The first aim is to compare, in a cohort study enrolling N=257 older adults (>65 years) with lung, gastrointestinal and prostate cancer, different easy measures of frailty (Geriatric 8 questionnaire (G8), Short physical Performance Battery (SPPB) and the IF-VIG), testing their ability to predict survival, functional status (ECOG, Barthel Index), quality of life (EuroQol5D) and resources utilization (visits, hospital admissions, treatments) at 3, 6 and 12 months. The second aim is to conduct a randomized controlled trial (RCT) enrolling N=134 patients per group, with similar characteristics to those enrolled for aim 1, but with mild-moderate frailty (G8≤14 points); we will compare a multi-component CGA-based intervention including physical exercise and nutritional recommendations with usual care, measuring the impact on the same outcomes as for aim 1, at 3 and 6 months. The use of ad hoc eHealth solutions (App/platform for exercise) will foster patients' empowerment and sustainability of the intervention. We will also assess patients, caregivers, and professionals' experience with the intervention through focus groups. Participants will be recruited from outpatients and from post-acute care units.

The PROFIT study will add relevant evidence for the management of older cancer patients. The impact, for the individual and the society, is high, in light of the aging of the population: the results will allow providing oncologists and other professionals with tools to improve the personalization of treatments, to finally provide adequate and tailored care programs. This might contribute to avoid the exclusion of patients who could benefit from active treatments and, on the other hand, reducing overtreatment for those who will likely not benefit from it. The clinical trial will also provide information on the most suitable content and on the impact of an intervention aimed at strengthening the functional status and improving the quality of life in older cancer patients with mild-moderate frailty, who might be potential candidates for subsequent onco-specific treatments. The project will also deliver adapted materials and eHealth solutions to be potentially scaled up for this profile of users, as a benefit for the society even beyond this project.

Being tested
Intervention group, Control group
Medical subject headings
Prostatic Neoplasms, Lung Neoplasms

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Intervention groupBehavioural

    Also called Tailored multidisciplinary intervention based on CGA, focused on a multicomponent physical exercise program with nutritional recommendations.

    1. Multi-component exercise intervention program based on Vivifrail©. It consists of 1 daily-30 minutes session, twice a week, for 10 consecutive weeks supervised by an experienced exercise specialist. Exercises (resistance, gait retraining, balance training) are personalized depending on the person's functional capacity (evaluated by the SPPB and a walking speed test) and the risk of falling. Between sessions, individual, unsupervised training by the own patient, supported in the case by the caregiver, will be stimulated, through the recommendations of ViviFrail©. 2) Nutrition. Personalized recommendations according to nutritional and medical status (active oncologic treatment, remission, or palliative stage) will be offered according to the ESPEN recommendations for cancer patients, aimed at compensating for inadequate energy intake, improving patients' malnutrition risk stage (assessed by means of the MNA-SF).
  • Control groupOther

    Also called Health psycho-education

    General recommendations (written and videos) will be offered.

Study groups in NCT05319145
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Control groupActive comparatorTreatment as usual. Mainly based on standard physical rehabilitation.
Receives: Other: Control group
Intervention groupExperimentalBased on the results of the CGA, a tailored multidisciplinary intervention will be proposed, focused on a multicomponent physical exercise program with nutritional recommendations.
Receives: Behavioral: Intervention group

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB)

    Change in physical function, measured by the difference on SPPB between follow-ups, hand grip and maximum resistance.

    Measured: Pre-intervention (baseline) and post-intervention at follow-ups (at 3, 6, and 12 months)

Secondary outcomes (10)
  1. Barthel

    Functional status and disability

    Measured: Pre-intervention (baseline) and post-intervention at follow-ups (at 3, 6, and 12 months)

  2. ECOG

    Functional status and disability

    Measured: Pre-intervention (baseline) and post-intervention at follow-ups (at 3, 6, and 12 months)

  3. EQoL-5D

    Quality of life

    Measured: Pre-intervention (baseline) and post-intervention at follow-ups (at 3, 6, and 12 months)

  4. Edmonton Symptom Assessment System

    Intensity of specific symptoms related to cancer

    Measured: Pre-intervention (baseline) and post-intervention at follow-ups (at 3, 6, and 12 months)

  5. Falls (yes vs. no & number of events)

    Potential adverse effects of the intervention

    Measured: Pre-intervention (baseline) and post-intervention at follow-ups (at 3, 6, and 12 months)

  6. Fractures (yes vs. no & number of events)

    Potential adverse effects of the intervention

    Measured: Pre-intervention (baseline) and post-intervention at follow-ups (at 3, 6, and 12 months)

  7. Pain (0-10 VAS)

    Potential adverse effects of the intervention

    Measured: Pre-intervention (baseline) and post-intervention at follow-ups (at 3, 6, and 12 months)

  8. Cardiovascular events (yes vs. no & number of events)

    Collecting ocurrence of angina, myocardial infarction, TIA and/or stroke

    Measured: Pre-intervention (baseline) and post-intervention at follow-ups (at 3, 6, and 12 months)

  9. Readmissions to the acute hospital

    Potential adverse effects

    Measured: Post-intervention at follow-ups (at 3, 6, and 12 months)

  10. Days spent at home (number of days)

    Related to process \& resources utilization

    Measured: Post-intervention at follow-ups (at 3, 6, and 12 months)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted8 Apr 2022
  2. Study start1 May 2022 (estimated)
  3. Primary completion1 Dec 2022 (estimated)
  4. Study completion31 Jan 2023 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Triple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
268 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05319145
Sponsor's protocol ID
PROFIT Study
Acronym
PROFIT
Status last verified
Apr 2022
First submitted
31 Mar 2022
Last updated
13 Apr 2022
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Intervention group in people with Older Adults and Gastro-Intestinal Cancer, run by Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron Research Institute at 3 sites in 2 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Apr 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 3 sites in Spain, Andorra. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) (time frame: Pre-intervention (baseline) and post-intervention at follow-ups (at 3, 6, and 12 months)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Apr 2022.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in