AzTrials
AzTrials

First AidReFANCT05312931

Retention of Knowledge and Skills of First Aid After Change in Concept of Teaching First Aid

An observational study of First Aid, run by Brno University Hospital.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The investigators will evaluate the effect of simulation-based education in First Aid practice on knowledge and skills retention. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 30 years
Conditions the study is for
First Aid
What is being tested?
OSCE
How many people
30 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
1 May 2022to 30 Apr 2023
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 30 years
  • All sexes
  • Adult

Study population: Students of General medicine and Dentistry of the Faculty of Medicine of Masaryk University who underwent FAT in autumn semester 2020 and 2021 and have not been involved in Student as Teacher programme.

Who may be able to join

  • Students of General medicine and Dentistry of the Faculty of Medicine of Masaryk University who underwent FAT in autumn semester 2020 and 2021 and have not been involved in Student as Teacher programme.

Who cannot join

  • Students of General medicine and Dentistry of the Faculty of Medicine of Masaryk University who underwent FAT in different time intervals or who underwent FAT in autumn semester 2020 and 2021 and also have been involved in Student as Teacher programme.

Trial locations and contacts

No sites are listed yet.

Tereza Prokopová, MD contact

+420736669784

prokopova.tereza@gmail.com

Tereza Vafková, MD contact

+420774131121

tereza.vafkova@med.muni.cz

About this study

The investigators will evaluate the effect of simulation-based education in First Aid practice on knowledge and skills retention.

Read the detailed description

In autumn semester 2020 a new concept of the subject First aid for the students of General medicine and Dentistry at Faculty of Medicine of Masaryk University was introduced. This concept based on evidence-based medical education puts different principles such as simulation-based education, learner-centred learning, peer learning and outcome-based education into practice.

First aid training (FAT) is indispensable part of the curriculum and knowledge of the first year medical students. The investigator´s aim is to evaluate if the new concept of the first aid training led to improvement in knowledge and mainly in skills of the students. Investigator´s null hypothesis is that the new concept does not lead to improvement in the long-term retention of the knowledge and the skills than the original concept. The investigators will compare tested knowledge and skills of the students who underwent FAT in autumn semester 2019 (original concept, group A) and the students who underwent FAT in autumn semester 2020 (new concept, group B).

The evaluation of the two groups will happen in the interval of 20-24 months after the completion of the FAT. Group A will be evaluated in autumn semester 2021, group B in autumn semester 2022. The evaluation method will be based on a knowledge test and a OSCE (objective structured clinical examination) stations.

Applying principles of evidence-based medical education into practice and designing FAT according to simulation-based education could lead better long-term retention of knowledge and skills of the students.

Conditions
First Aid
Being tested
OSCE
Keywords
retention of knowledge, retention of skills, First Aid

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • OSCEOther

    Students undergo OSCE (objective structured clinical exams). It means students will perform CPR for 2 min and their success rate will be monitored.

Study groups in NCT05312931
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Group Astudents who underwent original concept of First Aid
Receives: Other: OSCE
Group Bstudent who underwent new concept of First Aid
Receives: Other: OSCE

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Measurement of CPR quality - chest compression/ventilation ratio

    CPR quality will be measured with CPR monitoring (qCPR Anne - compression/ventilation feedback software). Attributes of CPR and a method of measurement:

    chest compression/ventilation ratio - investigator will count the number of chest compressions and a number of ventilation in each cycle in 2 min CPR. It will be statistically analyzed.

    Measured: Up to 36 months

  2. Measurement of CPR quality - percentage of adequate depth of chest compressions

    CPR quality will be measured with CPR monitoring (qCPR Anne - compression/ventilation feedback software). Attributes of CPR and a method of measurement:

    percentage of adequate depth of chest compressions (%) in 2 min CPR. Adequate depth of chest compression (5 - 6 cm).

    Method of mesurement: (qCPR Anne - compression/ventilation feedback software).

    Measured: Up to 36 months

  3. Measurement of CPR quality - the longest pause in chest compressions (s)

    CPR quality will be measured with CPR monitoring (qCPR Anne - compression/ventilation feedback software). Attributes of CPR and a method of measurement:

    the longest pause in chest compressions (s) in 2 min CPR. Method of mesurement: (qCPR Anne - compression/ventilation feedback software).

    Measured: Up to 36 months

  4. Measurement of CPR quality - percentage of chest compression when thorax was adequately released

    CPR quality will be measured with CPR monitoring (qCPR Anne - compression/ventilation feedback software). Attributes of CPR and a method of measurement:

    percentage of chest compression when thorax was adequately released (%) in 2 min CPR.

    Method of mesurement: (qCPR Anne - compression/ventilation feedback software).

    Measured: Up to 36 months

  5. Measurement of CPR quality - rescue breaths

    CPR quality will be measured with CPR monitoring (qCPR Anne - compression/ventilation feedback software). Attributes of CPR and a method of measurement:

    the number of detectable rescue breaths and number of unsuccessful rescue breaths during 2 min in CPR will be recorded. Detectable rescue breath means that the software was able to detect the rescue breath. Unsuccessful rescue breath means that the student tried to deliver rescue breath but the software was not able to detect it. Method of mesurement: (qCPR Anne - compression/ventilation feedback software).

    Measured: Up to 36 months

  6. Measurement of CPR quality - frequency of chest compressions

    CPR quality will be measured with CPR monitoring (qCPR Anne - compression/ventilation feedback software). Attributes of CPR and a method of measurement:

    frequency of chest compressions (compressions/min) in 2 min CPR will be measured with qCPR software. Method of mesurement: (qCPR Anne - compression/ventilation feedback software).

    Measured: Up to 36 months

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. Comparison of group A and B: Chest compressions/ventilation ratio

    Statistic analysis will be used in a comparison of Chest compressions/ventilation ratio in groups A and B.

    Chest compressions/ventilation ratio - good ratio 30:2 according to ERC.

    Measured: up to 36 months

  2. Comparison of group A and B: Depth of chest compressions

    Statistic analysis will be used to compare the depth of chest compressions in groups A and B.

    Depth of chest compressions: adequate chest compression is 5-6 cm.

    Measured: up to 36 months

  3. Comparison of group A and B: Frequency of chest compression

    Statistic analysis will be used in a comparison of the frequency of chest compression in groups A and B.

    Frequency of chest compression: adequate average frequency is 100-120/min.

    Measured: up to 36 months

  4. Comparison of group A and B: The longest pause in chest compressions

    Statistic analysis will be used in a comparison of the longest pause in chest compressions in groups A and B.

    The longest pause in chest compressions: adequate is up to 10s.

    Measured: up to 36 months

  5. Comparison of group A and B: rescue breaths

    Statistic analysis will be used in a comparison of the longest pause in chest compressions in groups A and B.

    The number of detectable rescue breaths and number of unsuccessful rescue breaths during 2 min in CPR will be statistically analyzed.

    Measured: up to 36 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted6 Apr 2022
  2. Study start1 May 2022 (estimated)
  3. Primary completion30 Apr 2023 (estimated)
  4. Study completion30 Apr 2023 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
30 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05312931
Sponsor's protocol ID
ReFA
Acronym
ReFA
Status last verified
Mar 2022
First submitted
17 Feb 2022
Last updated
6 Apr 2022
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No: The investigators do not plan to share IPD.

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of First Aid, run by Brno University Hospital.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Apr 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Tereza Prokopová, MD (+420736669784, prokopova.tereza@gmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Measurement of CPR quality - chest compression/ventilation ratio (time frame: Up to 36 months). The study lists 6 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Apr 2022.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in