AzTrials
AzTrials

Hearing Loss, SensorineuralSoftSpeechNCT05299892

Optimizing Soft Speech Recognition in Children With Hearing Loss

A study testing Phonak Audeo P or Naida P hearing aid in people with Hearing Loss, Sensorineural and Hearing Loss, Bilateral, run by Sonova AG at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Overhearing is important for vocabulary learning and speech and language development in young children. However, contemporary hearing aids are generally unable to provide adequate access to low-level auditory inputs from multiple talkers at a distance to capitalize on overhearing. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 4 to 12 years
What is being tested?
Phonak Audeo P or Naida P hearing aid
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
36 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
21 Mar 2022to 14 Oct 2022
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 4 to 12 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child

Who may be able to join

  • native English speakers who communicate verbally
  • no known speech language disorders, cognitive or learning issues
  • experienced hearing aid users (> 6 months use)
  • "full-time" hearing aid users (i.e., wear on a daily basis)
  • CNC word scores of 30% or better at 50dBA in quiet with SE "off"

Who cannot join

  • new hearing aid users
  • inconsistent hearing aid users
  • <4 years or >12 years of age
  • non-native English speaker who communicates verbally
  • known cognitive/ learning issues or speech language disorder
  • CNC word scores < 30% correct presented at 50dBA in quiet with SE "off"

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Hearts for Hearing

    Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73120

Other trials in United States

About this study

Overhearing is important for vocabulary learning and speech and language development in young children. However, contemporary hearing aids are generally unable to provide adequate access to low-level auditory inputs from multiple talkers at a distance to capitalize on overhearing. A recent investigation by Jace Wolfe and colleagues showed that, even when aided, children with hearing loss had significantly poorer speech recognition at 40, 50 and 60 dBA compared to children with normal hearing. Furthermore, they showed that increasing hearing aid gain for very low-level inputs produced a statistically significant improvement in syllable-final plural recognition and a non-significant trend toward better monosyllabic word recognition at very low presentation levels. Additional research is needed to document low-level speech recognition ability of children with hearing loss as well as the potential benefit or detriment of increasing hearing aid gain for low-level inputs. A novel hearing aid technology known as Soft Speech Enhancer has been shown improve low-level speech perception in adults with hearing loss; however, the effect of Speech Enhancer on speech recognition in children is not yet known and will be evaluated.

Read the detailed description

The primary objective of this study is to evaluate whether soft speech recognition in quiet is significantly improved with Speech Enhancer (SE) "on" at the default setting (moderate) compared to Speech Enhancer "off" in children with moderate (N3) to severe (N5) hearing loss. There are several secondary objectives: 1) To evaluate the main effects of age and Speech Enhancer strength, and potential interaction on speech recognition and comfort in children with moderate to severe hearing loss. 2) To demonstrate that hearing aids compensate for hearing loss in children.

This confirmatory clinical investigation will be executed at Hearts for Hearing. It is a single-group, single blind intervention study with each participant serving as his or her own control. However, in certain conditions participant blinding is not feasible (i.e., aided versus unaided performance). The outcome measures being assessed include: speech recognition in quiet with Consonant-Nucleus-Consonant (CNC) words, and comfort ratings using a Multiple Stimuli with Hidden Reference and Anchor (MUSHRA) procedure and looped sentences overlaid with low-level transient noise.

Four different hearing aid conditions will be assessed in this clinical investigation: unaided (no amplification), aided with SE "off", aided with SE "moderate", aided with SE "strong". For the unaided or no treatment condition no hearing aids will be worn. For aided conditions, experienced hearing aid users will be fit binaurally with investigational devices matching their personal device form factor connected to their personal acoustic coupling (e.g., earmold). Using the Audioscan Verifit 2, probe microphone measurements will be conducted to match DSL 5.0 pediatric quiet and noise targets. Three distinct programs will be created, each with a different SE strength.

Hearing aid program order (speech enhancer settings) will be randomized for all testing conditions except for CNC at 50 dBA Quiet with SE Off; that condition is administered first to establish candidacy for further testing. A randomized list of SE settings was generated for all participants for the remaining conditions.

Testing will be completed in a double-walled sound booth with calibrated equipment. Recorded stimuli will be presented through loudspeakers (Sony CFD-ZW755) from clinical audiometers (Grayson Stadler Standard) or Dell computers using the Arizona State University Speech Recognition Program, Windows Media Player and Adobe Audition. Speech stimuli will be presented from a loudspeaker located at 0 degrees azimuth (directly in front).

Speech recognition results will be compared to determine the effect of amplification on accuracy scores as well as the influence of speech enhancer on behaviorally measured benefit and subjectively-derived listening preference.

Being tested
Phonak Audeo P or Naida P hearing aid
Medical subject headings
Hearing Loss, Sensorineural, Hearing Loss, Bilateral

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Phonak Audeo P or Naida P hearing aidDevice

    Commercially available hearing aid that has access to speech enhancer feature settings "off", "moderate" and "strong"

Study groups in NCT05299892
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Children with Hearing LossExperimentalParticipants age 5-12 with hearing loss who will be fit with study hearing aids and tested on speech perception in unaided and aided condition.
Receives: Device: Phonak Audeo P or Naida P hearing aid

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Speech Recognition in Quiet Using CNC (Consonant-Nucleus-Consonant) Word Lists

    One word list of 25 words is presented at 50 dB (quiet conditions) through a front speaker. The percent correctly repeated words are calculated and a higher score indicates better speech perception. The participants completed this task without hearing aids. Data was collected on both age groups, but analysis was completed only on the entire group as a whole. Age effects were not tested.

    Measured: Day 1 of 1 day study

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Subjective Ratings of Speech Enhancer

    Participants will listen to a sound sample of looped sentences overlaid with low-level transient noise with the Speech Enhancer at different settings (off, moderate, strong) and rate their preference. An A/B comparison will be used to compare Speech Enhancer Off vs. Speech Enhancer Moderate, and Speech Enhancer Off vs. Speech Enhancer Strong. Participants answered three questions: 1) Which sounds better?, 2) Which is more comfortable?, and 3) Which do you prefer? Results will be reported as qualitative data and no statistical analysis will take place.

    Measured: Day 1 of 1 day study

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted29 Mar 2022
  2. Study start21 Mar 2022
  3. Primary completion14 Oct 2022
  4. Study completion14 Oct 2022

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Model description
One group of participants will be assessed unaided and aided with Phonak Audeo P or Phonak Naida P hearing aids with Speech Enhancer "off", "on at moderate", and "on at strong" settings.
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
36 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05299892
Sponsor's protocol ID
458
Acronym
SoftSpeech
Status last verified
Nov 2023
First submitted
1 Mar 2022
Last updated
14 Dec 2023
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Phonak Audeo P or Naida P hearing aid in people with Hearing Loss, Sensorineural and Hearing Loss, Bilateral, run by Sonova AG at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 Dec 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 18 Nov 2023). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Speech Recognition in Quiet Using CNC (Consonant-Nucleus-Consonant) Word Lists (time frame: Day 1 of 1 day study). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 Dec 2023.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in