Pulmonary Valve; FailureEUROPULMS3NCT05264181
Transcatheter Pulmonary Valve Implantation With SAPIEN 3 Valve
An observational study of Pulmonary Valve; Failure and Percutaneous Pulmonary Valve Implantation, run by Centre Chirurgical Marie Lannelongue at 1 site in France.
Trial summary
Background Transcatheter pulmonary valve implantation (TPVI) is indicated to treat right ventricular outflow tract dysfunction in patients with congenital heart diseases. Long-term outcomes following this procedure using the new generation SAPIEN 3 valve is little known. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 5 to 110 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Pulmonary Valve; Failure, Percutaneous Pulmonary Valve Implantation, Infective Endocarditis
- What is being tested?
- Percutaneous pulmonary valve implantation
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- How many people
- 600 participants
- Where
- 1 siteFrance
- Study dates
- 1 Sep 2021to 1 Aug 2022
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 5 to 110 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Study population: Inclusion criteria were a clinical indication for PPVI in the pulmonic position, with the decision to perform the procedure taken independently. So as to represent the broadest possible spectrum of patients undergoing PPVI, no further inclusion/exclusion criteria were stipulated. PPVI is usually indicated in symptomatic patients with congenital heart diseases or those with evidence of RV or left ventricular systolic dysfunction, severe RV enlargement with an indexed RV end-diastolic volume of greater than 160 mL/m2, or an indexed RV end-systolic volume of greater than 80 mL/m2 and those with decreases in exercise capacity.
Who may be able to join
- Patient with congenital heart disease, dysfunctional right ventricle outflow tract and indications for percutaneous pulmonary valve replacement as indicated by international guidelines-
- Patient having a valve replacement using a SAPIEN 3 valve
Who cannot join
- Patient having a valve replacement using a SAPIEN XT valve
- Patient having a valve replacement using a Melody valve
- Patient having a valve replacement using a Harmony valve
- Patient having a valve replacement using a Venus-P valve
- Patient refusing participation to the study
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Estibaliz Valdeolmillos, MD contact
France1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Hopital Marie Lannelongue
Le Plessis-Robinson, 92350
Sebastien Hascoet, MD, PhD, s.hascoet@ghpsj.fr
Estibaliz Valdeolmillos, MD, evaldeolmillos@ghpsj.fr
About this study
Official title: Long Term Outcomes Following Transcatheter Pulmonary Valve Implantation With SAPIEN 3 Valve : a Multicentre International Study
Background Transcatheter pulmonary valve implantation (TPVI) is indicated to treat right ventricular outflow tract dysfunction in patients with congenital heart diseases. Long-term outcomes following this procedure using the new generation SAPIEN 3 valve is little known.
Purpose This study aims to report mid-term outcomes in a large cohort of patients who had TPVI using the SAPIEN 3 valve.
Methods We designed a retrospective multicentre observational registry of patients undergoing TPVI with the SAPIEN 3 valve across centres in Europe, Middle-east and Canada. Patient-related, procedural, and mid-term outcomes data will be characterized.
Read the detailed description
- INTRODUCTION Percutaneous pulmonary valve implantation (PPVI) is effective to treat right ventricle outflow (RVOT) dysfunction. First reported by Bonhoeffer et al. in 2000, PPVI extends the lifespan of an existing RVOT revision and delays the need for repeat surgical intervention. First limited to patients with dysfunctional right-ventricle to pulmonary artery conduit, its feasibility was extended to patients with bioprosthesis, small expandable conduits and native RVOT. In select patients, it is nowadays a first-line approach to PV replacement. With longer follow-up, some issues arose such as the incidence of infective endocarditis (IE). It remains highly debatable if the risk of IE varied according to the type of implanted valve. Tricuspid valve injuries were also reported while advancing a valve without covering along the right heart cavities. However, most of the current evidence has been gathered using the early generation Melody (Medtronic Inc., Minneapolis, MN) or Edwards SAPIEN valves (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, CA). Ongoing prosthesis improvement programmes have led to the availability of the SAPIEN 3 (S3), a bovine pericardial valve mounted on a fatigue-resistant cobalt chromium alloy stent with inclusion of an outer polyethylene terephthalate skirt, available in 20, 23, 26 and 29 mm in diameter. First implanted in 2014 in pulmonary position and subsequently described in preliminary multicentre reports, PPVI with the S3 valve appears to be safe and feasible in a wide range of patients with congenital heart defects, including those with large native RVOT. Use of this valve and its smooth deflectable Commander delivery system has been shown to facilitate PPVI, together with the use of a long introducer delivery sheath. The procedures resulted in good short-term haemodynamic and functional outcomes, with very few adverse events, paving the way for worldwide implantation of the S3 valve in the pulmonic position. Furthermore, while prestenting is systematically recommended before implanting a Melody valve to decrease the risk of stent fracture during follow-up, S3 design and radial strength resulted in a modification of implantation method with decreased prestenting indications. However, positive safety and efficacy outcomes remains to be demonstrated over the longer term. There is currently little formal data on S3 implantation in the pulmonic position over few months. The objective of the present multicentre registry analysis was to explore safety, feasibility, and haemodynamic outcomes of PPVI using the S3 to up to five years.
- METHODS We designed a retrospective multicentre cohort study including all consecutives PPVI of a S3 valve between 2014 and decembre 2021 in European, Canadian and middle-east centres. The study was approved by an ethical committees (GERM IRB 00012157, reference 543, 27 October 2021) and performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and its amendments. 2.1 Centres These centres are situated in Europe (France, United-Kingdom, Germany, Italy, Spain, Switzerland, Poland), the Middle East (Turkey, Israel), and Canada. No minimum requirements pertaining to number of implants or operator experience are specified. 2.2 Patients Inclusion criteria were a clinical indication for PPVI and a prior implantation of the S3 in the pulmonic position, with the decision to perform the procedure taken independently. So as to represent the broadest possible spectrum of patients undergoing PPVI, no further inclusion/exclusion criteria were stipulated. PPVI is usually indicated in symptomatic patients or those with evidence of RV or left ventricular systolic dysfunction, severe RV enlargement with an indexed RV end-diastolic volume of greater than 160 mL/m2, or an indexed RV end-systolic volume of greater than 80 mL/m2 and those with decreases in exercise capacity. PPVI was performed using SAPIEN 3 valve in all cases. The SAPIEN 3 valve is characterized by a trileaflet valve crafted from bovine pericardium treated with the same ThermaFix process as Carpentier-Edwards surgical valves. The valve is sutured to a cobalt-chromium stent frame with optimized cell design to minimize profile and improve radial strength. Additionally, the SAPIEN 3 has an outer polyethylene terephthalate skirt which decreases the incidence of paravalvular leak. The SAPIEN 3 valve is available in 20- 23-, 26-, and 29-mm sizes and is introduced using the Commander delivery system (14 and 16-Fr expandable sheaths). It has obtained CE mark in 2021. 2.3 Data collection Given the wide range of patients represented in the study, the Pulmonic S3 electronic case report form (eCRF) was designed to accommodate the broadest possible spectrum of clinical settings in which PPVI may be indicated. As such, the data collected reflects the site's standard procedures, including but not limited to physical assessments, ECGs, laboratory testing, and cardiac imaging. Data entry was performed by the treating physician or study nurse through retrospective appraisal of medical records. Data regarding patient demographics, underlying diagnoses and RVOT anatomies were collected for the period prior to PPVI, with peri-procedural details and outcomes also documented. Follow-up time points for the assessment of adverse events and functional outcomes were 30 days, six months, one and two years. Data were subjected to regular automatic and manual checks for plausibility and completeness. 2.4 Outcomes and definitions Key haemodynamic and functional outcomes included changes in the peak systolic gradient over RVOT; degree of pulmonary regurgitation following PPVI. Feasibility was assessed according to procedural success (defined as successful implantation of a single valve at the intended location and retrieval of the delivery catheter), while safety outcomes included the rates of periprocedural technical complications (device malfunction [defined as failure to meet performance specifications or otherwise perform as expected]; valve dislocation requiring surgical intervention; and stent dislocation), periprocedural adverse events (significant bleeding; arrhythmia requiring pacing, drugs or cardioversion; conduit/RVOT rupture requiring emergency stenting or surgery; significant neurological impairment [based on clinical assessment; coronary compression; myocardial infarction; pulmonary embolism; and periprocedural death). 2.5 Statistics Data are presented as descriptive data summaries. Categorical variables are expressed as absolute numbers and frequencies (%), while continuous variables are expressed as means with standard deviations (SD) and minimum-maximum data ranges.
- RESULTS 3.1 Patient characteristics will be displayed 3.2 Procedural characteristics will be displayed 3.3 Periprocedural outcomes and safety will be reported
- What is known:
Percutaneous pulmonary valve implantation is safe and effective to treat right ventricle outflow tract dysfunction in patients with congenital heart diseases A wide spectrum of devices are being used currently. The new-generation SAPIEN 3 valve has recently been labelled for percutaneous pulmonary valve implantation.
- What the Study will Add: SAPIEN 3 Three and Five-years freedom from secondary pulmonary valve replacement will be reported SAPIEN 3 Annualized Incidence of infective endocarditis will be reported.
- Conditions
- Pulmonary Valve; Failure, Percutaneous Pulmonary Valve Implantation, Infective Endocarditis, Congenital Heart Disease
- Being tested
- Percutaneous pulmonary valve implantation
- Keywords
- percutaneous pulmonary valve implantation, SAPIEN 3, transcatheter pulmonary valve replacement, infective endocarditis, Congenital Heart Disease
- Medical subject headings
- Endocarditis, Heart Defects, Congenital
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Percutaneous pulmonary valve implantationDevice
Percutaneous pulmonary valve implantation using SAPIEN 3 valve in the context of routine care of patients with congenital heart diseases
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
secondary pulmonary valve replacement
annualized incidence of secondary valve replacement by catheterization or surgery for SAPIEN 3 valve failure
Measured: 5 years
Secondary outcomes (2)
Infective endocarditis
Annualized incidence of infective endocarditis on the SAPIEN 3 Vave
Measured: 5 years
Thrombosis
Annualized incidence of pulmonary vavle thrombosis following PPVI with Sapien 3 valve
Measured: 5 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted3 Mar 2022
- Study start1 Sep 2021
- Primary completion1 Mar 2022 (estimated)
- Study completion1 Aug 2022 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Pulmonary Valve; FailureStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
- Enrolment
- 600 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Centre Chirurgical Marie Lannelongue
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Institut für Pharmakologie und Präventive Medizin
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Alain Fraisse, MD, PhD, Study director, Royal Brompton & Harefield NHS Foundation Trust
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05264181
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2022-564
- Acronym
- EUROPULMS3
- Status last verified
- Feb 2022
- First submitted
- 22 Feb 2022
- Last updated
- 3 Mar 2022
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Hascoet S, Bentham JR, Giugno L, Betrian-Blasco P, Kempny A, Houeijeh A, Baho H, Sharma SR, Jones MI, Biernacka EK, Combes N, Georgiev S, Bouvaist H, Martins JD, Kantzis M, Turner M, Schubert S, Jalal Z, Butera G, Malekzadeh-Milani S, Valdeolmillos E, Karsenty C, Odemis E, Aldebert P, Haas NA, Khatib I, Wahlander H, Gaio G, Mendoza A, Arif S, Castaldi B, Dohlen G, Carere RG, Del Cerro-Marin MJ, Kitzmuller E, Hermuzi A, Carminati M, Guerin P, Tengler A, Fraisse A; EUROPULMS3 investigators. Outcomes of transcatheter pulmonary SAPIEN 3 valve implantation: an international registry. Eur Heart J. 2024 Jan 14;45(3):198-210. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehad663.
PubMed 37874971
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 3 Mar 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Long Term Outcomes Following Transcatheter Pulmonary Valve Implantation With SAPIEN 3 Valve : a Multicentre International Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05264181
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- EUROPULMS3 / 2022-564
- Conditions
- Pulmonary Valve; Failure, Percutaneous Pulmonary Valve Implantation, Infective Endocarditis, Congenital Heart Disease
- Keywords
- percutaneous pulmonary valve implantation, SAPIEN 3, transcatheter pulmonary valve replacement, infective endocarditis, Congenital Heart Disease
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 600 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Centre Chirurgical Marie LannelongueUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Institut für Pharmakologie und Präventive Medizin
- Study start
- 1 Sep 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Mar 2022 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 1 Aug 2022 (estimated)
- First posted
- 3 Mar 2022 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Background Transcatheter pulmonary valve implantation (TPVI) is indicated to treat right ventricular outflow tract dysfunction in patients with congenital heart diseases. Long-term outcomes following this procedure using the new generation SAPIEN 3 valve is little known.
Purpose This study aims to report mid-term outcomes in a large cohort of patients who had TPVI using the SAPIEN 3 valve.
Methods We designed a retrospective multicentre observational registry of patients undergoing TPVI with the SAPIEN 3 valve across centres in Europe, Middle-east and Canada. Patient-related, procedural, and mid-term outcomes data will be characterized.
Detailed description
- INTRODUCTION Percutaneous pulmonary valve implantation (PPVI) is effective to treat right ventricle outflow (RVOT) dysfunction. First reported by Bonhoeffer et al. in 2000, PPVI extends the lifespan of an existing RVOT revision and delays the need for repeat surgical intervention. First limited to patients with dysfunctional right-ventricle to pulmonary artery conduit, its feasibility was extended to patients with bioprosthesis, small expandable conduits and native RVOT. In select patients, it is nowadays a first-line approach to PV replacement. With longer follow-up, some issues arose such as the incidence of infective endocarditis (IE). It remains highly debatable if the risk of IE varied according to the type of implanted valve. Tricuspid valve injuries were also reported while advancing a valve without covering along the right heart cavities. However, most of the current evidence has been gathered using the early generation Melody (Medtronic Inc., Minneapolis, MN) or Edwards SAPIEN valves (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, CA). Ongoing prosthesis improvement programmes have led to the availability of the SAPIEN 3 (S3), a bovine pericardial valve mounted on a fatigue-resistant cobalt chromium alloy stent with inclusion of an outer polyethylene terephthalate skirt, available in 20, 23, 26 and 29 mm in diameter. First implanted in 2014 in pulmonary position and subsequently described in preliminary multicentre reports, PPVI with the S3 valve appears to be safe and feasible in a wide range of patients with congenital heart defects, including those with large native RVOT. Use of this valve and its smooth deflectable Commander delivery system has been shown to facilitate PPVI, together with the use of a long introducer delivery sheath. The procedures resulted in good short-term haemodynamic and functional outcomes, with very few adverse events, paving the way for worldwide implantation of the S3 valve in the pulmonic position. Furthermore, while prestenting is systematically recommended before implanting a Melody valve to decrease the risk of stent fracture during follow-up, S3 design and radial strength resulted in a modification of implantation method with decreased prestenting indications. However, positive safety and efficacy outcomes remains to be demonstrated over the longer term. There is currently little formal data on S3 implantation in the pulmonic position over few months. The objective of the present multicentre registry analysis was to explore safety, feasibility, and haemodynamic outcomes of PPVI using the S3 to up to five years.
- METHODS We designed a retrospective multicentre cohort study including all consecutives PPVI of a S3 valve between 2014 and decembre 2021 in European, Canadian and middle-east centres. The study was approved by an ethical committees (GERM IRB 00012157, reference 543, 27 October 2021) and performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and its amendments. 2.1 Centres These centres are situated in Europe (France, United-Kingdom, Germany, Italy, Spain, Switzerland, Poland), the Middle East (Turkey, Israel), and Canada. No minimum requirements pertaining to number of implants or operator experience are specified. 2.2 Patients Inclusion criteria were a clinical indication for PPVI and a prior implantation of the S3 in the pulmonic position, with the decision to perform the procedure taken independently. So as to represent the broadest possible spectrum of patients undergoing PPVI, no further inclusion/exclusion criteria were stipulated. PPVI is usually indicated in symptomatic patients or those with evidence of RV or left ventricular systolic dysfunction, severe RV enlargement with an indexed RV end-diastolic volume of greater than 160 mL/m2, or an indexed RV end-systolic volume of greater than 80 mL/m2 and those with decreases in exercise capacity. PPVI was performed using SAPIEN 3 valve in all cases. The SAPIEN 3 valve is characterized by a trileaflet valve crafted from bovine pericardium treated with the same ThermaFix process as Carpentier-Edwards surgical valves. The valve is sutured to a cobalt-chromium stent frame with optimized cell design to minimize profile and improve radial strength. Additionally, the SAPIEN 3 has an outer polyethylene terephthalate skirt which decreases the incidence of paravalvular leak. The SAPIEN 3 valve is available in 20- 23-, 26-, and 29-mm sizes and is introduced using the Commander delivery system (14 and 16-Fr expandable sheaths). It has obtained CE mark in 2021. 2.3 Data collection Given the wide range of patients represented in the study, the Pulmonic S3 electronic case report form (eCRF) was designed to accommodate the broadest possible spectrum of clinical settings in which PPVI may be indicated. As such, the data collected reflects the site's standard procedures, including but not limited to physical assessments, ECGs, laboratory testing, and cardiac imaging. Data entry was performed by the treating physician or study nurse through retrospective appraisal of medical records. Data regarding patient demographics, underlying diagnoses and RVOT anatomies were collected for the period prior to PPVI, with peri-procedural details and outcomes also documented. Follow-up time points for the assessment of adverse events and functional outcomes were 30 days, six months, one and two years. Data were subjected to regular automatic and manual checks for plausibility and completeness. 2.4 Outcomes and definitions Key haemodynamic and functional outcomes included changes in the peak systolic gradient over RVOT; degree of pulmonary regurgitation following PPVI. Feasibility was assessed according to procedural success (defined as successful implantation of a single valve at the intended location and retrieval of the delivery catheter), while safety outcomes included the rates of periprocedural technical complications (device malfunction [defined as failure to meet performance specifications or otherwise perform as expected]; valve dislocation requiring surgical intervention; and stent dislocation), periprocedural adverse events (significant bleeding; arrhythmia requiring pacing, drugs or cardioversion; conduit/RVOT rupture requiring emergency stenting or surgery; significant neurological impairment [based on clinical assessment; coronary compression; myocardial infarction; pulmonary embolism; and periprocedural death). 2.5 Statistics Data are presented as descriptive data summaries. Categorical variables are expressed as absolute numbers and frequencies (%), while continuous variables are expressed as means with standard deviations (SD) and minimum-maximum data ranges.
- RESULTS 3.1 Patient characteristics will be displayed 3.2 Procedural characteristics will be displayed 3.3 Periprocedural outcomes and safety will be reported
- What is known:
Percutaneous pulmonary valve implantation is safe and effective to treat right ventricle outflow tract dysfunction in patients with congenital heart diseases A wide spectrum of devices are being used currently. The new-generation SAPIEN 3 valve has recently been labelled for percutaneous pulmonary valve implantation.
- What the Study will Add: SAPIEN 3 Three and Five-years freedom from secondary pulmonary valve replacement will be reported SAPIEN 3 Annualized Incidence of infective endocarditis will be reported.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 5 to 110 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Inclusion criteria were a clinical indication for PPVI in the pulmonic position, with the decision to perform the procedure taken independently. So as to represent the broadest possible spectrum of patients undergoing PPVI, no further inclusion/exclusion criteria were stipulated. PPVI is usually indicated in symptomatic patients with congenital heart diseases or those with evidence of RV or left ventricular systolic dysfunction, severe RV enlargement with an indexed RV end-diastolic volume of greater than 160 mL/m2, or an indexed RV end-systolic volume of greater than 80 mL/m2 and those with decreases in exercise capacity.
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Patient with congenital heart disease, dysfunctional right ventricle outflow tract and indications for percutaneous pulmonary valve replacement as indicated by international guidelines-
- Patient having a valve replacement using a SAPIEN 3 valve
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Patient having a valve replacement using a SAPIEN XT valve
- Patient having a valve replacement using a Melody valve
- Patient having a valve replacement using a Harmony valve
- Patient having a valve replacement using a Venus-P valve
- Patient refusing participation to the study
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Percutaneous pulmonary valve implantationPercutaneous pulmonary valve implantation using SAPIEN 3 valve in the context of routine care of patients with congenital heart diseases | Device | – |
Primary outcome
secondary pulmonary valve replacement
Time frame: 5 years
annualized incidence of secondary valve replacement by catheterization or surgery for SAPIEN 3 valve failure
2 secondary outcomes
Infective endocarditis
Time frame: 5 years
Thrombosis
Time frame: 5 years
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 3 Mar 2022.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 37874971Hascoet S, Bentham JR, Giugno L, Betrian-Blasco P, Kempny A, Houeijeh A, Baho H, Sharma SR, Jones MI, Biernacka EK, Combes N, Georgiev S, Bouvaist H, Martins JD, Kantzis M, Turner M, Schubert S, Jalal Z, Butera G, Malekzadeh-Milani S, Valdeolmillos E, Karsenty C, Odemis E, Aldebert P, Haas NA, Khatib I, Wahlander H, Gaio G, Mendoza A, Arif S, Castaldi B, Dohlen G, Carere RG, Del Cerro-Marin MJ, Kitzmuller E, Hermuzi A, Carminati M, Guerin P, Tengler A, Fraisse A; EUROPULMS3 investigators. Outcomes of transcatheter pulmonary SAPIEN 3 valve implantation: an international registry. Eur Heart J. 2024 Jan 14;45(3):198-210. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehad663.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Pulmonary Valve; Failure
Recruiting
Heart@Home Safety and Efficacy of Hospital-at-Home Care Versus Standard Hospitalization in Cardiac Patients
Myocardial Infarction, Myocarditis Acute
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Expanded Studies on the SCAPIS Stockholm Reexamination Cohort
Coronary Artery Disease, Arterial Stiffness, Blood Pressure
RecruitingObservational study
Prospective Evaluation of AI-ECG for SHD Detection
Valvular Heart Disease Stenosis and Regurgitation (Diagnosis), Pulmonary Hypertension (Diagnosis)
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Multimodal Physiologic State Intelligence Study
Heart Failure, Cardiomyopathies
Recruiting
The CardioClip Study
Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction, Mitral Regurgitation
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Estibaliz Valdeolmillos, MD contact
Alain Fraisse, MD, PhD study director
Royal Brompton & Harefield NHS Foundation Trust
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Pulmonary Valve; Failure and Percutaneous Pulmonary Valve Implantation, run by Centre Chirurgical Marie Lannelongue at 1 site in France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 Mar 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Sebastien Hascoet, MD, PhD (0140942429 ext. +33, s.hascoet@ghpsj.fr), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
secondary pulmonary valve replacement (time frame: 5 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05264181, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 Mar 2022.