AzTrials
AzTrials

Pulmonary Valve; FailureEUROPULMS3NCT05264181

Transcatheter Pulmonary Valve Implantation With SAPIEN 3 Valve

An observational study of Pulmonary Valve; Failure and Percutaneous Pulmonary Valve Implantation, run by Centre Chirurgical Marie Lannelongue at 1 site in France.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Background Transcatheter pulmonary valve implantation (TPVI) is indicated to treat right ventricular outflow tract dysfunction in patients with congenital heart diseases. Long-term outcomes following this procedure using the new generation SAPIEN 3 valve is little known. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 5 to 110 years
What is being tested?
Percutaneous pulmonary valve implantation
Type of treatment
Medical device
How many people
600 participants
Where
1 siteFrance
Study dates
1 Sep 2021to 1 Aug 2022
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 5 to 110 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Study population: Inclusion criteria were a clinical indication for PPVI in the pulmonic position, with the decision to perform the procedure taken independently. So as to represent the broadest possible spectrum of patients undergoing PPVI, no further inclusion/exclusion criteria were stipulated. PPVI is usually indicated in symptomatic patients with congenital heart diseases or those with evidence of RV or left ventricular systolic dysfunction, severe RV enlargement with an indexed RV end-diastolic volume of greater than 160 mL/m2, or an indexed RV end-systolic volume of greater than 80 mL/m2 and those with decreases in exercise capacity.

Who may be able to join

  • Patient with congenital heart disease, dysfunctional right ventricle outflow tract and indications for percutaneous pulmonary valve replacement as indicated by international guidelines-
  • Patient having a valve replacement using a SAPIEN 3 valve

Who cannot join

  • Patient having a valve replacement using a SAPIEN XT valve
  • Patient having a valve replacement using a Melody valve
  • Patient having a valve replacement using a Harmony valve
  • Patient having a valve replacement using a Venus-P valve
  • Patient refusing participation to the study

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Sebastien Hascoet, MD, PhD contact

0140942429 ext. +33

s.hascoet@ghpsj.fr

Estibaliz Valdeolmillos, MD contact

evaldeolmillos@ghpsj.fr

France1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Hopital Marie Lannelongue

    Le Plessis-Robinson, 92350

    Sebastien Hascoet, MD, PhD, s.hascoet@ghpsj.fr

    Estibaliz Valdeolmillos, MD, evaldeolmillos@ghpsj.fr

    Recruiting

Other trials in France

About this study

Official title: Long Term Outcomes Following Transcatheter Pulmonary Valve Implantation With SAPIEN 3 Valve : a Multicentre International Study

Background Transcatheter pulmonary valve implantation (TPVI) is indicated to treat right ventricular outflow tract dysfunction in patients with congenital heart diseases. Long-term outcomes following this procedure using the new generation SAPIEN 3 valve is little known.

Purpose This study aims to report mid-term outcomes in a large cohort of patients who had TPVI using the SAPIEN 3 valve.

Methods We designed a retrospective multicentre observational registry of patients undergoing TPVI with the SAPIEN 3 valve across centres in Europe, Middle-east and Canada. Patient-related, procedural, and mid-term outcomes data will be characterized.

Read the detailed description
  1. INTRODUCTION Percutaneous pulmonary valve implantation (PPVI) is effective to treat right ventricle outflow (RVOT) dysfunction. First reported by Bonhoeffer et al. in 2000, PPVI extends the lifespan of an existing RVOT revision and delays the need for repeat surgical intervention. First limited to patients with dysfunctional right-ventricle to pulmonary artery conduit, its feasibility was extended to patients with bioprosthesis, small expandable conduits and native RVOT. In select patients, it is nowadays a first-line approach to PV replacement. With longer follow-up, some issues arose such as the incidence of infective endocarditis (IE). It remains highly debatable if the risk of IE varied according to the type of implanted valve. Tricuspid valve injuries were also reported while advancing a valve without covering along the right heart cavities. However, most of the current evidence has been gathered using the early generation Melody (Medtronic Inc., Minneapolis, MN) or Edwards SAPIEN valves (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, CA). Ongoing prosthesis improvement programmes have led to the availability of the SAPIEN 3 (S3), a bovine pericardial valve mounted on a fatigue-resistant cobalt chromium alloy stent with inclusion of an outer polyethylene terephthalate skirt, available in 20, 23, 26 and 29 mm in diameter. First implanted in 2014 in pulmonary position and subsequently described in preliminary multicentre reports, PPVI with the S3 valve appears to be safe and feasible in a wide range of patients with congenital heart defects, including those with large native RVOT. Use of this valve and its smooth deflectable Commander delivery system has been shown to facilitate PPVI, together with the use of a long introducer delivery sheath. The procedures resulted in good short-term haemodynamic and functional outcomes, with very few adverse events, paving the way for worldwide implantation of the S3 valve in the pulmonic position. Furthermore, while prestenting is systematically recommended before implanting a Melody valve to decrease the risk of stent fracture during follow-up, S3 design and radial strength resulted in a modification of implantation method with decreased prestenting indications. However, positive safety and efficacy outcomes remains to be demonstrated over the longer term. There is currently little formal data on S3 implantation in the pulmonic position over few months. The objective of the present multicentre registry analysis was to explore safety, feasibility, and haemodynamic outcomes of PPVI using the S3 to up to five years.
  2. METHODS We designed a retrospective multicentre cohort study including all consecutives PPVI of a S3 valve between 2014 and decembre 2021 in European, Canadian and middle-east centres. The study was approved by an ethical committees (GERM IRB 00012157, reference 543, 27 October 2021) and performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and its amendments. 2.1 Centres These centres are situated in Europe (France, United-Kingdom, Germany, Italy, Spain, Switzerland, Poland), the Middle East (Turkey, Israel), and Canada. No minimum requirements pertaining to number of implants or operator experience are specified. 2.2 Patients Inclusion criteria were a clinical indication for PPVI and a prior implantation of the S3 in the pulmonic position, with the decision to perform the procedure taken independently. So as to represent the broadest possible spectrum of patients undergoing PPVI, no further inclusion/exclusion criteria were stipulated. PPVI is usually indicated in symptomatic patients or those with evidence of RV or left ventricular systolic dysfunction, severe RV enlargement with an indexed RV end-diastolic volume of greater than 160 mL/m2, or an indexed RV end-systolic volume of greater than 80 mL/m2 and those with decreases in exercise capacity. PPVI was performed using SAPIEN 3 valve in all cases. The SAPIEN 3 valve is characterized by a trileaflet valve crafted from bovine pericardium treated with the same ThermaFix process as Carpentier-Edwards surgical valves. The valve is sutured to a cobalt-chromium stent frame with optimized cell design to minimize profile and improve radial strength. Additionally, the SAPIEN 3 has an outer polyethylene terephthalate skirt which decreases the incidence of paravalvular leak. The SAPIEN 3 valve is available in 20- 23-, 26-, and 29-mm sizes and is introduced using the Commander delivery system (14 and 16-Fr expandable sheaths). It has obtained CE mark in 2021. 2.3 Data collection Given the wide range of patients represented in the study, the Pulmonic S3 electronic case report form (eCRF) was designed to accommodate the broadest possible spectrum of clinical settings in which PPVI may be indicated. As such, the data collected reflects the site's standard procedures, including but not limited to physical assessments, ECGs, laboratory testing, and cardiac imaging. Data entry was performed by the treating physician or study nurse through retrospective appraisal of medical records. Data regarding patient demographics, underlying diagnoses and RVOT anatomies were collected for the period prior to PPVI, with peri-procedural details and outcomes also documented. Follow-up time points for the assessment of adverse events and functional outcomes were 30 days, six months, one and two years. Data were subjected to regular automatic and manual checks for plausibility and completeness. 2.4 Outcomes and definitions Key haemodynamic and functional outcomes included changes in the peak systolic gradient over RVOT; degree of pulmonary regurgitation following PPVI. Feasibility was assessed according to procedural success (defined as successful implantation of a single valve at the intended location and retrieval of the delivery catheter), while safety outcomes included the rates of periprocedural technical complications (device malfunction [defined as failure to meet performance specifications or otherwise perform as expected]; valve dislocation requiring surgical intervention; and stent dislocation), periprocedural adverse events (significant bleeding; arrhythmia requiring pacing, drugs or cardioversion; conduit/RVOT rupture requiring emergency stenting or surgery; significant neurological impairment [based on clinical assessment; coronary compression; myocardial infarction; pulmonary embolism; and periprocedural death). 2.5 Statistics Data are presented as descriptive data summaries. Categorical variables are expressed as absolute numbers and frequencies (%), while continuous variables are expressed as means with standard deviations (SD) and minimum-maximum data ranges.
  3. RESULTS 3.1 Patient characteristics will be displayed 3.2 Procedural characteristics will be displayed 3.3 Periprocedural outcomes and safety will be reported
  • What is known:

Percutaneous pulmonary valve implantation is safe and effective to treat right ventricle outflow tract dysfunction in patients with congenital heart diseases A wide spectrum of devices are being used currently. The new-generation SAPIEN 3 valve has recently been labelled for percutaneous pulmonary valve implantation.

  • What the Study will Add: SAPIEN 3 Three and Five-years freedom from secondary pulmonary valve replacement will be reported SAPIEN 3 Annualized Incidence of infective endocarditis will be reported.
Being tested
Percutaneous pulmonary valve implantation
Keywords
percutaneous pulmonary valve implantation, SAPIEN 3, transcatheter pulmonary valve replacement, infective endocarditis, Congenital Heart Disease
Medical subject headings
Endocarditis, Heart Defects, Congenital

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Percutaneous pulmonary valve implantationDevice

    Percutaneous pulmonary valve implantation using SAPIEN 3 valve in the context of routine care of patients with congenital heart diseases

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. secondary pulmonary valve replacement

    annualized incidence of secondary valve replacement by catheterization or surgery for SAPIEN 3 valve failure

    Measured: 5 years

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Infective endocarditis

    Annualized incidence of infective endocarditis on the SAPIEN 3 Vave

    Measured: 5 years

  2. Thrombosis

    Annualized incidence of pulmonary vavle thrombosis following PPVI with Sapien 3 valve

    Measured: 5 years

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted3 Mar 2022
  2. Study start1 Sep 2021
  3. Primary completion1 Mar 2022 (estimated)
  4. Study completion1 Aug 2022 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrolment
600 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05264181
Sponsor's protocol ID
2022-564
Acronym
EUROPULMS3
Status last verified
Feb 2022
First submitted
22 Feb 2022
Last updated
3 Mar 2022
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Hascoet S, Bentham JR, Giugno L, Betrian-Blasco P, Kempny A, Houeijeh A, Baho H, Sharma SR, Jones MI, Biernacka EK, Combes N, Georgiev S, Bouvaist H, Martins JD, Kantzis M, Turner M, Schubert S, Jalal Z, Butera G, Malekzadeh-Milani S, Valdeolmillos E, Karsenty C, Odemis E, Aldebert P, Haas NA, Khatib I, Wahlander H, Gaio G, Mendoza A, Arif S, Castaldi B, Dohlen G, Carere RG, Del Cerro-Marin MJ, Kitzmuller E, Hermuzi A, Carminati M, Guerin P, Tengler A, Fraisse A; EUROPULMS3 investigators. Outcomes of transcatheter pulmonary SAPIEN 3 valve implantation: an international registry. Eur Heart J. 2024 Jan 14;45(3):198-210. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehad663.

    PubMed 37874971

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Pulmonary Valve; Failure and Percutaneous Pulmonary Valve Implantation, run by Centre Chirurgical Marie Lannelongue at 1 site in France.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 Mar 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Sebastien Hascoet, MD, PhD (0140942429 ext. +33, s.hascoet@ghpsj.fr), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

secondary pulmonary valve replacement (time frame: 5 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05264181, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 Mar 2022.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in