AzTrials
AzTrials

Obstructive Sleep Apnea of ChildNCT05154214

Surgical Treatment of Children With OSA and Small Tonsils or Down Syndrome

An observational study of Obstructive Sleep Apnea of Child, run by Oregon Health and Science University at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to prospectively compare the effectiveness of a novel personalized approach to the surgical treatment of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in children, drug induced sleep endoscopy (DISE) directed surgery versus the standard adenotonsillectomy (AT). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 2 to 18 years
Conditions the study is for
Obstructive Sleep Apnea of Child
What is being tested?
Adenotonsillectomy and Drug-induced sleep endoscopy directed surgery
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
How many people
30 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
9 Nov 2021to 11 Oct 2024
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 2 to 18 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult

Study population: Participants will be recruited from the Oregon Health and Science University pediatric otolaryngology clinic and from the pediatric sleep medicine clinic.

Who may be able to join

  • Moderate OSA (oAHI ≥ 5),
  • Clinically small tonsils (Brodsky score 1+ or 2+) AND/OR Down syndrome
  • Desiring surgical treatment.
  • English or Spanish speaking

Who cannot join

  • Non-Down Syndrome neuromuscular disorder, craniofacial anomaly, genetic abnormality, subglottic or tracheal stenosis, tracheostomy dependence.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Oregon Health and Science University

    Portland, Oregon, 97239

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Prospective Study of Surgical Treatment of Children With Obstructive Sleep Apnea and Small Tonsils or Down Syndrome

The purpose of this study is to prospectively compare the effectiveness of a novel personalized approach to the surgical treatment of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in children, drug induced sleep endoscopy (DISE) directed surgery versus the standard adenotonsillectomy (AT). This will also serve to test the feasibility of recruiting families for a future randomized protocol comparing the same surgical techniques. It is the investigators' central hypothesis that a personalized DISE-directed surgical approach that uses existing procedures to address the specific fixed and dynamic anatomic features causing obstruction (ie, anatomic endotypes) in each child with small tonsils or Down syndrome will be superior to the currently recommended standard first line approach of AT. This novel approach may improve OSA outcomes and reduce the burden of unnecessary AT or secondary surgery for persistent OSA after an ineffective AT. To test this hypothesis, the investigators will study children aged 2 to 18 years with clinically small tonsils (Brodsky score 1+ or 2+ on a scale 1+ to 4+) OR Down syndrome.

Read the detailed description

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is defined as repetitive obstruction of the upper airway during sleep and has been estimated to affect 1-6% of the general pediatric population. Untreated OSA in children has been associated with childhood hypertension, autonomic dysfunction, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, neurobehavioral impairment, and poor quality of life. These sequelae contribute to a 226% increase in health care utilization among children with OSA compared to controls, primarily in the form of increased hospitalizations, emergency department visits, and medication use. Adenotonsillar hypertrophy is considered the most common risk factor for OSA in children, and adenotonsillectomy (AT) is the first line treatment.

Although AT is the recommended first line treatment for pediatric OSA in treatment guidelines, multiple studies have demonstrated that AT is not always curative, with estimates of persistent OSA after AT ranging from 25 to 75%. Many risk factors for AT failure have been reported, but the impact of tonsil size on AT outcome remains a controversial topic. Not every child with enlarged tonsils will have OSA, and conversely, there are many children with proven OSA who do not have clinically large tonsils or adenoids. The prevalence of small tonsils (1+ or 2+ on Brodsky tonsil scoring scale of 1+ to 4+) has been reported to be 67-70% among children with symptoms of OSA presenting to either the emergency department or a pediatric pulmonology clinic. Clinic assessment of tonsil size during an awake examination has not consistently correlated with either baseline disease severity or response to AT. The outcome of AT in children with small tonsils (Brodsky 1+ or 2+) remains unknown and clinical decisions in children with small tonsils are not evidence-based.

Patients with Down Syndrome have a higher incidence of OSA than the general pediatric population, with rates of 30-60%, resulting in increased morbidity and decreased quality of life for affected individuals. Children with Down Syndrome often undergo T\&A for obstructive sleep apnea; however 30-50% will have persistent obstructive sleep patterns requiring continuous positive pressure airway support (CPAP) or tracheotomy. Persistent obstruction is attributed to anatomic and physiologic differences in this population, including reduced muscular tone, macroglossia, maxillary hypoplasia, and lingual tonsil hypertrophy.

Drug-induced sleep endoscopy (DISE) enables direct observation of the sites and patterns of obstruction during sedated sleep. DISE increasingly helps guide surgical decision-making in adult OSA, and the investigators hypothesize DISE can guide surgical decisions in pediatric OSA and improve outcomes. Towards that end, the study team has developed and validated the DISE Rating Scale in children. Furthermore, the investigators have demonstrated DISE ratings of adenotonsillar obstruction during sedated sleep are strongly associated with both OSA severity and response to AT, unlike clinic assessments of tonsil size. This preliminary data and others' studies have identified non-adenotonsillar obstruction can also occur at the nose, palate, base of tongue, and larynx. DISE findings in surgically naïve children and the outcomes of procedures based on those findings have been reported in mostly small observational case series. The surgical plan may be modified from the standard AT in up to 77% of children based on DISE findings. These alternative procedures can be less invasive (e.g., only isolated adenoidectomy or isolated tonsillectomy) or include procedures to address other anatomic sites in addition to or instead of the tonsils and adenoids. The most commonly reported non-adenotonsillar sites of obstruction are the nose, velopharynx (soft palate), tongue base, and the larynx. DISE-directed surgery at these sites may improve pediatric OSA outcomes, but existing studies are small, uncontrolled case series in heterogeneous study populations. There are no trials directly comparing AT and DISE-directed surgery in the common scenario of surgically naïve children with small tonsils. This study will inform a future randomized trial that has the potential to change the paradigm of treating OSA in children with small tonsils or Down syndrome, thereby improving outcomes, and reducing inappropriate AT and need for secondary sleep surgery.

Being tested
Adenotonsillectomy, Drug-induced sleep endoscopy directed surgery
Keywords
Adenotonsillectomy, Drug-induced sleep endoscopy, pediatric, otolaryngology, OSA, sleep apnea, Down Syndrome
Medical subject headings
Sleep Apnea Syndromes, Down Syndrome

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • AdenotonsillectomyProcedure or surgery

    Removal of tonsils and adenoids

  • Drug-induced sleep endoscopy directed surgeryProcedure or surgery

    Surgeries selected based on direct visualization of airway collapse using endoscopy during drug-induced sleep

Study groups in NCT05154214
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
AdenotonsillectomyExcision of the palatine tonsils and excision or ablation of the adenoids by each individual surgeon's preferred techniques.
Receives: Procedure: Adenotonsillectomy
Drug-induced sleep endoscopy directed surgery (DISE)DISE will be performed by the surgeon performing the surgical intervention. The DISE Rating Scale assesses the degree of maximal closure or obstruction at six locations in the upper airway: the nose, nasopharynx (adenoids), velopharynx (soft palate), oropharynx (tonsils), tongue base (tongue, lingual tonsils), and larynx (epiglottis, arytenoids). The degree of obstruction is scored on a 3-point rating scale as none (0), partial (+1), or complete (+2) at each anatomic site. The rating at each anatomic level can be summed into a DISE Rating Scale total. The actual surgery performed will determine which established surgical treatments will be used based on the results of the DISE.
Receives: Procedure: Drug-induced sleep endoscopy directed surgery

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change in Pediatric Quality of Life (PedsQL), a generic quality of life scale

    Parent and child-reported surveys, higher scores indicate better quality of life, mean scores 0-100

    Measured: 6 months post-surgery

  2. Parent-reported ease of participation

    Parent-reported survey or parent interview

    Measured: 6 months post-surgery

  3. Parent-reported barriers to recruitment

    Parent-reported survey or parent interview

    Measured: Initial visit

  4. Change in Obstructive Sleep Apnea -18 (OSA-18): disease-specific quality of life survey

    Parent-reported survey, higher scores mean higher disease burden, scores from 18-126

    Measured: 6 months post-surgery

  5. Parent-reported barriers to recruitment

    Parent-reported survey or parent interview

    Measured: 6 months post-surgery

Secondary outcomes (8)
  1. Change in Obstructive Apnea-Hypopnea Index (oAHI)

    As measured in clinical polysomnography (PSG)

    Measured: 6 months post-surgery

  2. Change in Total Apnea-Hypopnea Index

    As measured in clinical polysomnography (PSG)

    Measured: 6 months post-surgery

  3. Change in REM Apnea-Hypopnea Index (REM AHI)

    As measured in clinical polysomnography (PSG)

    Measured: 6 months post-surgery

  4. Change in Minimum Oxygen Saturation (Min SpO2)

    As measured in clinical polysomnography (PSG)

    Measured: 6 months post-surgery

  5. Change in Mean End Tidal CO2 (ETCO2)

    As measured in clinical polysomnography (PSG)

    Measured: 6 months post-surgery

  6. Change in Max End Tidal CO2 (ETCO2)

    As measured in clinical polysomnography (PSG)

    Measured: 6 months post-surgery

  7. Change in Oxyhemoglobin desaturation ≥3% Index (ODI)

    As measured in clinical polysomnography (PSG)

    Measured: 6 months post-surgery

  8. Change in % Total Sleep Time with ETCO2 > 45/50 mmHg

    As measured in clinical polysomnography (PSG)

    Measured: 6 months post-surgery

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted13 Dec 2021
  2. Study start9 Nov 2021
  3. Primary completion11 Oct 2024
  4. Study completion11 Oct 2024

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
30 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05154214
Sponsor's protocol ID
STUDY00023287
Status last verified
Sep 2025
First submitted
15 Nov 2021
Last updated
29 Sep 2025
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Obstructive Sleep Apnea of Child, run by Oregon Health and Science University at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Sep 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change in Pediatric Quality of Life (PedsQL), a generic quality of life scale (time frame: 6 months post-surgery). The study lists 5 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Sep 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in