OsteoporosisPhase 4NCT05101018
Treatment With Romosozumab Versus Denosumab to Improve Bone Mineral Density and Architecture in Subacute SCI
A Phase 4 study testing Romosozumab and Denosumab in people with Osteoporosis and Spinal Cord Injuries, run by James J. Peters Veterans Affairs Medical Center at 2 sites in United States.
Trial summary
The objective of the proposed work is to determine whether administration for 12 months of romosozumab followed by 12 months of denosumab will maintain bone mass at the knee in subjects with subacute SCI compared to 24 months of denosumab administration alone. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 55 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Osteoporosis, Spinal Cord Injuries
- What is being tested?
- Romosozumab and Denosumab
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 40 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- 1 Nov 2021to 1 Nov 2027
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 55 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Traumatic motor-complete or incomplete SCI C4-L2 (AIS grade A-C);
- Duration of SCI less than 6 months;
- Males and females (premenopausal) between the ages of 18 and 55 years old; and a safe range of BMD right above the knee as determined by study staff review;
Who cannot join
- Active and/or history of coronary heart disease or stroke;
- Bone cancer;
- Long-bone fracture of the leg within the past year;
- History of prior bone disease (for example, Paget's hyperparathyroidism, osteoporosis, etc.);
- Postmenopausal women;
- Men with known low functioning tests before SCI;
Show all 18Show fewer
- Drugs geared toward increasing BMD longer than a six month duration after SCI;
- As determined by study staff review of my medication history of glucocorticoid administration longer than three months duration within the last year
- Abnormalities of my endocrine glands such as hyperthyroidism, Cushing's disease or syndrome, etc.;
- Severe underlying chronic disease (for example chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), end-stage heart disease, chronic renal failure);
- Heterotopic ossification (HO) of the distal femur (the knee end of the thigh bone). HO is a condition where bone tissue forms outside of the skeleton. If HO is found in any other area than the distal femur it will not prevent my participation in the study.;
- History of chronic alcohol abuse;
- Diagnosis of hypercalcemia (high levels of calcium in the blood);
- Pregnancy;
- As determined by study staff review of my medications a bisphosphonate for heterotopic ossification (HO), or other medications to treat osteoporosis other than calcium and vitamin D;
- Current diagnosis of cancer or history of cancer;
- As determined by study staff review of my medications, prescribed moderate or high dose corticosteroids (>40 mg/d prednisone or an equivalent dose of other corticosteroid medication) for longer than one week, not including drug administered to preserve neurological function at the time of acute SCI; and
- Life expectancy less than 5 years.
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country.
United States2 sites
James J. Peters VA Medical Center
The Bronx, New York, 10468
Kessler Institute for Rehabilitation
West Orange, New Jersey, 07052
About this study
The objective of the proposed work is to determine whether administration for 12 months of romosozumab followed by 12 months of denosumab will maintain bone mass at the knee in subjects with subacute SCI compared to 24 months of denosumab administration alone.
Read the detailed description
Sublesional bone loss after acute spinal cord injury (SCI) is sudden, progressive, and dramatic. After depletion of bone mass and the loss of architectural integrity, it may be difficult, if even possible, to restore skeletal mass and strength. Romosozumab is a human monoclonal anti-sclerostin antibody bone anabolic agent that recently gained FDA approval to treat osteoporosis in postmenopausal women. This study will test the ability of romosozumab administered in FDA-approved therapeutic doses for 12 months to prevent loss of BMD to regions of interest of the lower extremities in persons with subacute SCI; attention will be focused to the knee region (distal femur), but the proximal tibia and hip regions will also be acquired and analyzed. The ability of denosumab to preserve the gains in BMD attained with romosozumab will be determined.The romosozumab + denosumab group will be compared to a group that receives 24 months of denosumab.
In persons with acute/subacute motor-compete SCI (<6 months since SCI), the primary objectives in the intervention group are to maintain baseline values of sublesional distal femur aBMD at 12 months after single drug therapy (12 months of romosozumab) and at 24 months after sequential dual drug therapy (12 months of romosozumab followed by 12 months of denosumab). This dual drug intervention group will be compared to a group that receives denosumab for 24 months; each active drug group will be compared to a historical control (placebo) group.
- Conditions
- Osteoporosis, Spinal Cord Injuries
- Being tested
- Romosozumab, Denosumab
- Keywords
- Osteoporosis, Spinal Cord Injuries, Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry, Denosumab, Romosozumab
- Medical subject headings
- Osteoporosis, Spinal Cord Injuries
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
RomosozumabDrug
Also called Evenity
Romosozumab (Amgen Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA) 210mg SQ administered each month
DenosumabDrug
Also called Prolia
Denosumab (Amgen Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA) 60 mg SQ administered every six months
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Romosozumab Baseline to Month 11 followed by Denosumab Month 12 to Month 24 | Experimental | Of the forty (40) individuals with subacute spinal cord injury (SCI) enrolled in this study, twenty (20) participants will be randomly selected to receive romosozumab (210mg SQ) once a month for 12 months.
After 12 months the same twenty (20) individuals will receive denosumab (60mg SQ) at month 12 and 18. Receives: Drug: Romosozumab; Drug: Denosumab |
| Denosumab Baseline to Month 24 | Active comparator | Of the forty (40) individuals with subacute spinal cord injury (SCI) enrolled in this study, twenty (20) participants will be randomly selected to receive denosumab (60 mg SQ) at baseline and 6, 12, and 18 months. Receives: Drug: Denosumab |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Bone mineral density (BMD) of the distal femur metaphysis
BMD at the distal femur metaphysis will be obtained by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA)
Measured: Baseline to 24 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted29 Oct 2021
- Study start1 Nov 2021
- Primary completion1 Jun 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion1 Nov 2027 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (3)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for OsteoporosisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Arm 1: romosozumab administered monthly from baseline to month 11 followed by denosumab at month 12 and 18. Arm 2: denosumab administered at baseline, month 6, 12, and 18
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- James J. Peters Veterans Affairs Medical Center
- Sponsor type
- US federal agency
- Collaborators
- Kessler Institute for Rehabilitation
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Chris Cardozo, James J. Peters Veterans Affairs Medical Center
- Investigators
- Steven C Kirshblum, M.D., Principal investigator, Kessler Institute for Rehabilitation
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05101018
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- BAU-19-60
- Status last verified
- Sep 2025
- First submitted
- 14 Oct 2021
- Last updated
- 17 Sep 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Lewiecki EM, Dinavahi RV, Lazaretti-Castro M, Ebeling PR, Adachi JD, Miyauchi A, Gielen E, Milmont CE, Libanati C, Grauer A. One Year of Romosozumab Followed by Two Years of Denosumab Maintains Fracture Risk Reductions: Results of the FRAME Extension Study. J Bone Miner Res. 2019 Mar;34(3):419-428. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.3622. Epub 2018 Dec 3.
PubMed 30508316Cosman F, Crittenden DB, Ferrari S, Khan A, Lane NE, Lippuner K, Matsumoto T, Milmont CE, Libanati C, Grauer A. FRAME Study: The Foundation Effect of Building Bone With 1 Year of Romosozumab Leads to Continued Lower Fracture Risk After Transition to Denosumab. J Bone Miner Res. 2018 Jul;33(7):1219-1226. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.3427. Epub 2018 May 17.
PubMed 29573473McClung MR, Brown JP, Diez-Perez A, Resch H, Caminis J, Meisner P, Bolognese MA, Goemaere S, Bone HG, Zanchetta JR, Maddox J, Bray S, Grauer A. Effects of 24 Months of Treatment With Romosozumab Followed by 12 Months of Denosumab or Placebo in Postmenopausal Women With Low Bone Mineral Density: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase 2, Parallel Group Study. J Bone Miner Res. 2018 Aug;33(8):1397-1406. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.3452. Epub 2018 May 22.
PubMed 29694685
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 17 Sep 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Treatment With Romosozumab Versus Denosumab to Improve Bone Mineral Density and Architecture in Subacute SCI
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05101018
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- BAU-19-60
- Conditions
- Osteoporosis, Spinal Cord Injuries
- Keywords
- Osteoporosis, Spinal Cord Injuries, Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry, Denosumab, Romosozumab
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Active, not recruiting
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- James J. Peters Veterans Affairs Medical CenterUS federal agency
- Collaborators
- Kessler Institute for Rehabilitation
- Study start
- 1 Nov 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Jun 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 1 Nov 2027 (estimated)
- First posted
- 29 Oct 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The objective of the proposed work is to determine whether administration for 12 months of romosozumab followed by 12 months of denosumab will maintain bone mass at the knee in subjects with subacute SCI compared to 24 months of denosumab administration alone.
Detailed description
Sublesional bone loss after acute spinal cord injury (SCI) is sudden, progressive, and dramatic. After depletion of bone mass and the loss of architectural integrity, it may be difficult, if even possible, to restore skeletal mass and strength. Romosozumab is a human monoclonal anti-sclerostin antibody bone anabolic agent that recently gained FDA approval to treat osteoporosis in postmenopausal women. This study will test the ability of romosozumab administered in FDA-approved therapeutic doses for 12 months to prevent loss of BMD to regions of interest of the lower extremities in persons with subacute SCI; attention will be focused to the knee region (distal femur), but the proximal tibia and hip regions will also be acquired and analyzed. The ability of denosumab to preserve the gains in BMD attained with romosozumab will be determined.The romosozumab + denosumab group will be compared to a group that receives 24 months of denosumab.
In persons with acute/subacute motor-compete SCI (<6 months since SCI), the primary objectives in the intervention group are to maintain baseline values of sublesional distal femur aBMD at 12 months after single drug therapy (12 months of romosozumab) and at 24 months after sequential dual drug therapy (12 months of romosozumab followed by 12 months of denosumab). This dual drug intervention group will be compared to a group that receives denosumab for 24 months; each active drug group will be compared to a historical control (placebo) group.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Arm 1: romosozumab administered monthly from baseline to month 11 followed by denosumab at month 12 and 18. Arm 2: denosumab administered at baseline, month 6, 12, and 18
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Romosozumab Baseline to Month 11 followed by Denosumab Month 12 to Month 24 | Experimental | Drug: Romosozumab, Drug: DenosumabOf the forty (40) individuals with subacute spinal cord injury (SCI) enrolled in this study, twenty (20) participants will be randomly selected to receive romosozumab (210mg SQ) once a month for 12 months. After 12 months the same twenty (20) individuals will receive denosumab (60mg SQ) at month 12 and 18. |
| Denosumab Baseline to Month 24 | Active comparator | Drug: DenosumabOf the forty (40) individuals with subacute spinal cord injury (SCI) enrolled in this study, twenty (20) participants will be randomly selected to receive denosumab (60 mg SQ) at baseline and 6, 12, and 18 months. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 55 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Traumatic motor-complete or incomplete SCI C4-L2 (AIS grade A-C);
- Duration of SCI less than 6 months;
- Males and females (premenopausal) between the ages of 18 and 55 years old; and a safe range of BMD right above the knee as determined by study staff review;
Key exclusion criteria (18 listed)
- Active and/or history of coronary heart disease or stroke;
- Bone cancer;
- Long-bone fracture of the leg within the past year;
- History of prior bone disease (for example, Paget's hyperparathyroidism, osteoporosis, etc.);
- Postmenopausal women;
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| RomosozumabAlso: EvenityRomosozumab (Amgen Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA) 210mg SQ administered each month | Drug | Romosozumab Baseline to Month 11 followed by Denosumab Month 12 to Month 24 |
| DenosumabAlso: ProliaDenosumab (Amgen Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA) 60 mg SQ administered every six months | Drug | Denosumab Baseline to Month 24, Romosozumab Baseline to Month 11 followed by Denosumab Month 12 to Month 24 |
Primary outcome
Bone mineral density (BMD) of the distal femur metaphysis
Time frame: Baseline to 24 months
BMD at the distal femur metaphysis will be obtained by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA)
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 17 Sep 2025.
- Background: PubMed 30508316Lewiecki EM, Dinavahi RV, Lazaretti-Castro M, Ebeling PR, Adachi JD, Miyauchi A, Gielen E, Milmont CE, Libanati C, Grauer A. One Year of Romosozumab Followed by Two Years of Denosumab Maintains Fracture Risk Reductions: Results of the FRAME Extension Study. J Bone Miner Res. 2019 Mar;34(3):419-428. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.3622. Epub 2018 Dec 3.
- Background: PubMed 29573473Cosman F, Crittenden DB, Ferrari S, Khan A, Lane NE, Lippuner K, Matsumoto T, Milmont CE, Libanati C, Grauer A. FRAME Study: The Foundation Effect of Building Bone With 1 Year of Romosozumab Leads to Continued Lower Fracture Risk After Transition to Denosumab. J Bone Miner Res. 2018 Jul;33(7):1219-1226. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.3427. Epub 2018 May 17.
- Background: PubMed 29694685McClung MR, Brown JP, Diez-Perez A, Resch H, Caminis J, Meisner P, Bolognese MA, Goemaere S, Bone HG, Zanchetta JR, Maddox J, Bray S, Grauer A. Effects of 24 Months of Treatment With Romosozumab Followed by 12 Months of Denosumab or Placebo in Postmenopausal Women With Low Bone Mineral Density: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase 2, Parallel Group Study. J Bone Miner Res. 2018 Aug;33(8):1397-1406. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.3452. Epub 2018 May 22.
Related trials for Osteoporosis
RecruitingObservational study
A Clinical Study to Collect Real-wordt Data on Safety and Clinical Performance of the VCFix Spinal System for Treatment of Vertebral Compression Fractures of (Suspected) Osteoporotic Origin.
Vertebra Compression Fracture
Active, not recruitingObservational study
The Impact of Osteosarcopenia on Falls, Kinesiophobia, and Quality of Life in Postmenopausal Women
Osteosarcopenia, Sarcopenia
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
TCM Formula vs. HMB in Pre-Frail Elders: Muscle Strength and Bone Status
Pre-Frailty, Sarcopenia
Not yet recruitingPhase 4
Romosozumab and Denosumab Combination Therapy for Osteoporosis
Postmenopausal Osteoporosis
RecruitingObservational study
Assessment and Comparison of Osteoporosis Risk Factors After Stroke
Stroke, Osteoporosis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Steven C Kirshblum, M.D. principal investigator
Kessler Institute for Rehabilitation
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Romosozumab and Denosumab in people with Osteoporosis and Spinal Cord Injuries, run by James J. Peters Veterans Affairs Medical Center at 2 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 18 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Sep 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Bone mineral density (BMD) of the distal femur metaphysis (time frame: Baseline to 24 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05101018, which also lists 3 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Sep 2025.