AzTrials
AzTrials

Lung DiseasesNCT05072236

Effects of Adding Different Drugs for Preventing Cough Induced by Bronchoscopic Spraying of Local Anesthetics

A study testing bronchoscopic insertion in people with Lung Diseases and Total Intravenous Anesthesia, run by National Taiwan University Hospital at 1 site in Taiwan.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Cough is the most unwanted response during bronchoscopic interventions for hemodynamic instability, hypoxemia, and interruption of interventions. Topical lidocaine is recommended with a grade evidence in British Thoracic Society guideline. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 20 to 65 years
What is being tested?
bronchoscopic insertion
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
108 participants
Where
1 siteTaiwan
Study dates
9 May 2022to 30 Oct 2024
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 20 to 65 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • patients planned to receive bronchoscopic interventions for lung tumors with intravenous anesthesia.

Who cannot join

  • conventional bronchoscopy without interventions such as EBUS, tracheal tumore excision

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Taiwan1 site
  • National Taiwan University Cancer Center Hospital

    Taipei

Other trials in Taiwan

About this study

Official title: Effects of Adding Intravenous Lidocaine, Alfentanil Before Bronchoscopic Insertion for Preventing Cough During Bronchoscopic Spraying of Local Anesthetics in Non-intubated Bronchoscoopic Interventions

Cough is the most unwanted response during bronchoscopic interventions for hemodynamic instability, hypoxemia, and interruption of interventions. Topical lidocaine is recommended with a grade evidence in British Thoracic Society guideline. However, severe cough often induces during the initial bronchoscopic spraying of local anesthesia, follows with uneven spraying, spasm or arrythmias. In previous reports, there were many drugs and techniques investigated for preventing cough during broncoscopic spraying. As bronchoscopic interventions need more space and stability of airways to precisely operate on, few studies have focused on the effects of different drugs for preventing cough. In this study, Different intravenous drugs (lidocaine, alfentanil, compared to normal saline) is planned to be injected one minutes before bronchoscopic insertion, the responses to bronchoscopicly spraying local anestheticsuch as cough intensity, BIS levels, ANI, Transdermal O2 and CO2, respiration were recorded and analyzed.

Read the detailed description

Cough is the most unwanted response during bronchoscopic interventions. Cough could lead to airway spasm, hemodynamic instability, desaturation, hypoventilation, and then interrupt the following interventions. In previous reports, lodicaine and other drugs given intravenously, inhalationally or trans-cricoidally have been investigated for preventing cough during conventional broncoscopic examinations. As bronchoscopic interventions were goaled to precise localization and operations with higher yield rate. Steady airways without endotracheal tubes are usually required. Topical lidocaine is recommended with a grade evidence in British Thoracic Society guideline. However, severe cough often induces during the initial bronchoscopic spraying of local anesthesia, follows with uneven spraying, spasm or arrythmias. There are few studies focused on the effects of different drugs for preventing cough even bronchoscopic spary of local anesthetics has become the routine pratice before interventions. In this study, different intravenous drugs (lidocaine, alfentanil, compared to normal saline) are planned to be injected one minutes before bronchoscopic insertion, the responses to bronchoscopic spraying local anesthetic were recorded and analyzed. Besdies cough scores, the following changes are recorded and compared: (1) status on visualization and the responses to spraying of vocal cords, (2) anesthetic depth (BIS levels), ANI scores (3) blood pressure and heart beats, (4) data of hemoglobin saturation (SPO2) and Transdermal O2 and CO2. We goaled to compare the effects of intravenous lidocaine and etomidate on cough intensity, hemodynamics, ventilation, and bronchoscopic withdrawl rate during bronchoscopic interventions with intravenous anethesia.

Being tested
bronchoscopic insertion
Keywords
cough, desaturation, ventilation, bronchoscopic interventions
Medical subject headings
Lung Diseases, Cough, Respiratory Aspiration

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • bronchoscopic insertionProcedure or surgery

    Also called bronchoscopic spraying of 2% lidocaine

    After intravenous anesthesia is stabilized with BIS levels between 50-70, Intravenous lidocaine 1.5 mg/kg, or alfentanil 10 ug/kg, or 5 mL normal saline will be injected. Bronchoscopic insertion will be started 1 minute later. After seeing the vocal cords, local spraying of 2% will be initiated from vocal cords, trachea, and bilateral bronchial trees.

Study groups in NCT05072236
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
normal salinePlacebo comparatorintravenous normal saline 5 mL 1 minute before bronchoscope insertion
Receives: Procedure: bronchoscopic insertion
lidocaineActive comparatorintravenous lidocaine 1.5 mg/kg 1 minute before bronchoscope insertion
Receives: Procedure: bronchoscopic insertion
alfentanilExperimentalintravenous alfentanil 10 ug/kg 1 minute before bronchoscope insertion
Receives: Procedure: bronchoscopic insertion

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. cough score

    cough severity x times Cough severity was graded on a 5-point scale: minimal cough, 1 point; moderate cough, 2 points; severe cough, 3 points; bouts of coughing, 4 points; and series of bouts of coughing, 5 points.

    Measured: from bronchoscopic spray local anesthetics on vocal cords to the end of spraying on bonchial trees

  2. BIS levels from EEG monitor

    the changes of BIS levels (0-100)

    Measured: from 1 minutes before bronchoscopic insertion to 20 minutes after bronchoscopic interventions

  3. ANI scores from analgesia-nociception monitor (0-100)

    the changes of ANI scores (0-100)

    Measured: from 1 minutes before bronchoscopic insertion to 20 minutes after bronchoscopic interventions

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. MAP

    mean arterial pressure, mmHg

    Measured: from bronchoscopic insertion to 20 minutes after completion of local anesthetic spraying

  2. heart rate

    heart rate, beats/ minute

    Measured: from bronchoscopic insertion to 20 minutes after completion of local anesthetic spraying

  3. SPO2

    SPO2, %

    Measured: from bronchoscopic insertion to 20 minutes after completion of local anesthetic spraying

  4. Transdermal CO2

    Transdermal CO2, mmHg

    Measured: from bronchoscopic insertion to 20 minutes after completion of local anesthetic spraying

  5. BTransdermal O2

    Transdermal O2, mmHg

    Measured: from bronchoscopic insertion to 20 minutes after completion of local anesthetic spraying

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted8 Oct 2021
  2. Study start9 May 2022
  3. Primary completion30 Jun 2024
  4. Study completion30 Oct 2024

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
108 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05072236
Sponsor's protocol ID
202107071MIND
Status last verified
Sep 2025
First submitted
14 Sep 2021
Last updated
19 Nov 2025
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing bronchoscopic insertion in people with Lung Diseases and Total Intravenous Anesthesia, run by National Taiwan University Hospital at 1 site in Taiwan.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Nov 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Taiwan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

cough score (time frame: from bronchoscopic spray local anesthetics on vocal cords to the end of spraying on bonchial trees). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Nov 2025.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in