Non-carious Cervical LesionsNCT05029479
the Clinical Performance of a Moisture Resistant, M-TEG-P Phosphate Monomer Based Universal Adhesive (YAMAKIN TMR-Aquabond0) Compared to the Conventional Universal Adhesive (3m ESPE Single Bond Universal Adhesive)
A study testing Bonding in NCCLs in people with Non-carious Cervical Lesions and Geriatric Patients, run by Cairo University at 1 site in Egypt.
Trial summary
this trial is to test the clinical performance of a novel moisture resistant, M-TEG-P phosphate monomer based universal adhesive (YAMAKIN TMR-Aquabond0) compared to the conventional universal adhesive (3m ESPE Single Bond Universal Adhesive) in geriatric patients with Non-carious Cervical lesions (NCLLs) Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 60 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Non-carious Cervical Lesions, Geriatric Patients
- What is being tested?
- Bonding in NCCLs
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 28 participants
- Where
- 1 siteEgypt
- Study dates
- 13 Oct 2021to Dec 2022
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 60 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Non-carious cervical lesions in anterior and posterior teeth.
- Geriatric patients from age 60 years and above.
- Patients willing to commit to the whole period of the study.
- Males \& Females included.
Who cannot join
- Lack of written informed consent to participate
- Cervical hypersensitivities
- Underage patients
- Allergies to components of the materials used
- Infectious diseases
- Mucosal diseases with unclear diagnosis
Show all 14Show fewer
- Inadequate oral hygiene
- Bruxism
- High caries activity
- Non-vital pulp
- Severe periodontal diseases
- Severe dysgnathia/traumatic occlusion
- Undergoing orthodontic treatments
- Undergoing bleaching procedures
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Clinical Performance of a Moisture Resistant, M-TEG-P Phosphate Monomer-based Universal Adhesive in Geriatric Patients With Non-carious Cervical Lesions (NCLLs):A Randomized Clinical Trial
this trial is to test the clinical performance of a novel moisture resistant, M-TEG-P phosphate monomer based universal adhesive (YAMAKIN TMR-Aquabond0) compared to the conventional universal adhesive (3m ESPE Single Bond Universal Adhesive) in geriatric patients with Non-carious Cervical lesions (NCLLs)
Read the detailed description
To evaluate the clinical performance of a novel moisture resistant, M-TEG-P phosphate monomer based universal adhesive (YAMAKIN TMR-Aquabond0) compared to the conventional universal adhesive (3m ESPE Single Bond Universal Adhesive) in geriatric patients with Non-carious Cervical lesions (NCLLs)
P: Population: Geriatric patients with non-carious cervical lesions (NCCLs) I: Intervention: Novel moisture resistant, M-TEG-P phosphate monomer based universal adhesive (YAMAKIN TMR-Aquabond0) C: Comparator : 3m ESPE Single Bond Universal Adhesive O: Outcome:Clinical Performance using FDI criteria
- Conditions
- Non-carious Cervical Lesions, Geriatric Patients
- Being tested
- Bonding in NCCLs
- Keywords
- Non-Carious cervical lesions
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Bonding in NCCLsOther
bonding agent which can resist moisture and has shorter decalcifying and curing time
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Yamakin TMR-Aquabond0 | Experimental | Novel Moisture Resistant, M-TEG-P Phosphate Monomer Based Universal Adhesive (YAMAKIN TMR-Aquabond0) Receives: Other: Bonding in NCCLs |
| 3m ESPE Single Bond Universal Adhesive | Active comparator | Conventional Universal Adhesive Receives: Other: Bonding in NCCLs |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Number of fractured restorations
First, visual inspection to ensure that there is no complete loss of retention of the restoration then tactile evaluation will be done using probe tip that will be held gently at right angle to the labial surface and move from restoration to tooth and vice versa to insure there is no rocking /fracture /ditching in the restoration following FDI criteria ( first visually for total loss followed by tactile inspection using FDI probe for any fracture /rocking or loss of retention.
Measured: 12 months
Number of restorations with retention loss
First, visual inspection to ensure that there is no complete loss of retention of the restoration then tactile evaluation will be done using probe tip that will be held gently at right angle to the labial surface and move from restoration to tooth and vice versa to insure no rocking /fracture /ditching in the restoration following FDI criteria
Measured: 12 months
Secondary outcomes (2)
Number of restoration with change in colour or texture
Evaluation will be done visually following FDI criteria to ensure no change in colour or texture of the restoration
Measured: 12 months
Number of restoration caused biological harm
Evaluation will be done following FDI criteria using FDI probe to ensure there is no change in restoration that caused any harm to the health of biological structure
Measured: 12 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted31 Aug 2021
- Study start13 Oct 2021
- Primary completion13 Oct 2022 (estimated)
- Study completionDec 2022 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (13)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Non-carious Cervical LesionsStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Cairo UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 28 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Cairo University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Hend Taha Hanafi Mahmoud, Cairo University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05029479
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Novel YAMAKIN TMR-Aquabond0
- Status last verified
- Jul 2022
- First submitted
- 21 Aug 2021
- Last updated
- 21 Jul 2022
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Li Y, Hu X, Xia Y, Ji Y, Ruan J, Weir MD, Lin X, Nie Z, Gu N, Masri R, Chang X, Xu HHK. Novel magnetic nanoparticle-containing adhesive with greater dentin bond strength and antibacterial and remineralizing capabilities. Dent Mater. 2018 Sep;34(9):1310-1322. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2018.06.001. Epub 2018 Jun 21.
PubMed 29935766Wawrzynkiewicz A, Rozpedek-Kaminska W, Galita G, Lukomska-Szymanska M, Lapinska B, Sokolowski J, Majsterek I. The Cytotoxicity and Genotoxicity of Three Dental Universal Adhesives-An In Vitro Study. Int J Mol Sci. 2020 May 31;21(11):3950. doi: 10.3390/ijms21113950.
PubMed 32486393Santis LR, Silva TM, Haddad BA, Goncalves LL, Goncalves SE. Influence of dentin thickness on intrapulpal temperature under simulated pulpal pressure during Nd:YAG laser irradiation. Lasers Med Sci. 2017 Jan;32(1):161-167. doi: 10.1007/s10103-016-2098-1. Epub 2016 Oct 24.
PubMed 27778115Akarsu S, Karademir SA, Ertas E, Atasoy S. The effect of diode laser application on restoration of non carious cervical lesion: Clinical follow up. Niger J Clin Pract. 2020 Feb;23(2):165-171. doi: 10.4103/njcp.njcp_399_19.
PubMed 32031090Peumans M, Politano G, Van Meerbeek B. Treatment of noncarious cervical lesions: when, why, and how. Int J Esthet Dent. 2020;15(1):16-42.
PubMed 31994534Wagner A, Wendler M, Petschelt A, Belli R, Lohbauer U. Bonding performance of universal adhesives in different etching modes. J Dent. 2014 Jul;42(7):800-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2014.04.012. Epub 2014 May 6.
PubMed 24814138Ranjitha GR, Vikram R, Meena N, Vijayalakshmi L, Murthy CS. Clinical efficacy of universal adhesives for the restoration of noncarious cervical lesions: A randomized clinical trial. J Conserv Dent. 2020 May-Jun;23(3):227-232. doi: 10.4103/JCD.JCD_51_20. Epub 2020 Dec 4.
PubMed 33551590Hickel R, Peschke A, Tyas M, Mjor I, Bayne S, Peters M, Hiller KA, Randall R, Vanherle G, Heintze SD. FDI World Dental Federation - clinical criteria for the evaluation of direct and indirect restorations. Update and clinical examples. J Adhes Dent. 2010 Aug;12(4):259-72. doi: 10.3290/j.jad.a19262.
PubMed 20847997Loguercio AD, Luque-Martinez IV, Fuentes S, Reis A, Munoz MA. Effect of dentin roughness on the adhesive performance in non-carious cervical lesions: A double-blind randomized clinical trial. J Dent. 2018 Feb;69:60-69. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2017.09.011. Epub 2017 Sep 27.
PubMed 28962842Milia E, Cumbo E, Cardoso RJ, Gallina G. Current dental adhesives systems. A narrative review. Curr Pharm Des. 2012;18(34):5542-52. doi: 10.2174/138161212803307491.
PubMed 22632386Sawlani K, Lawson NC, Burgess JO, Lemons JE, Kinderknecht KE, Givan DA, Ramp L. Factors influencing the progression of noncarious cervical lesions: A 5-year prospective clinical evaluation. J Prosthet Dent. 2016 May;115(5):571-7. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.10.021. Epub 2016 Jan 7.
PubMed 26774320de Paris Matos T, Perdigao J, de Paula E, Coppla F, Hass V, Scheffer RF, Reis A, Loguercio AD. Five-year clinical evaluation of a universal adhesive: A randomized double-blind trial. Dent Mater. 2020 Nov;36(11):1474-1485. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2020.08.007. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
PubMed 32933775Luque-Martinez IV, Perdigao J, Munoz MA, Sezinando A, Reis A, Loguercio AD. Effects of solvent evaporation time on immediate adhesive properties of universal adhesives to dentin. Dent Mater. 2014 Oct;30(10):1126-35. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2014.07.002. Epub 2014 Aug 16.
PubMed 25139815
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 21 Jul 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Clinical Performance of a Moisture Resistant, M-TEG-P Phosphate Monomer-based Universal Adhesive in Geriatric Patients With Non-carious Cervical Lesions (NCLLs):A Randomized Clinical Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05029479
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Novel YAMAKIN TMR-Aquabond0
- Conditions
- Non-carious Cervical Lesions, Geriatric Patients
- Keywords
- Non-Carious cervical lesions
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 28 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Cairo UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 13 Oct 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 13 Oct 2022 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Dec 2022 (estimated)
- First posted
- 31 Aug 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
this trial is to test the clinical performance of a novel moisture resistant, M-TEG-P phosphate monomer based universal adhesive (YAMAKIN TMR-Aquabond0) compared to the conventional universal adhesive (3m ESPE Single Bond Universal Adhesive) in geriatric patients with Non-carious Cervical lesions (NCLLs)
Detailed description
To evaluate the clinical performance of a novel moisture resistant, M-TEG-P phosphate monomer based universal adhesive (YAMAKIN TMR-Aquabond0) compared to the conventional universal adhesive (3m ESPE Single Bond Universal Adhesive) in geriatric patients with Non-carious Cervical lesions (NCLLs)
P: Population: Geriatric patients with non-carious cervical lesions (NCCLs) I: Intervention: Novel moisture resistant, M-TEG-P phosphate monomer based universal adhesive (YAMAKIN TMR-Aquabond0) C: Comparator : 3m ESPE Single Bond Universal Adhesive O: Outcome:Clinical Performance using FDI criteria
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Yamakin TMR-Aquabond0 | Experimental | Other: Bonding in NCCLsNovel Moisture Resistant, M-TEG-P Phosphate Monomer Based Universal Adhesive (YAMAKIN TMR-Aquabond0) |
| 3m ESPE Single Bond Universal Adhesive | Active comparator | Other: Bonding in NCCLsConventional Universal Adhesive |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 60 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Non-carious cervical lesions in anterior and posterior teeth.
- Geriatric patients from age 60 years and above.
- Patients willing to commit to the whole period of the study.
- Males \& Females included.
Key exclusion criteria (14 listed)
- Lack of written informed consent to participate
- Cervical hypersensitivities
- Underage patients
- Allergies to components of the materials used
- Infectious diseases
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Bonding in NCCLsbonding agent which can resist moisture and has shorter decalcifying and curing time | Other | 3m ESPE Single Bond Universal Adhesive, Yamakin TMR-Aquabond0 |
Primary outcome
Number of fractured restorations
Time frame: 12 months
First, visual inspection to ensure that there is no complete loss of retention of the restoration then tactile evaluation will be done using probe tip that will be held gently at right angle to the labial surface and move from restoration to tooth and vice versa to insure there is no rocking /fracture /ditching in the restoration following FDI criteria ( first visually for total loss followed by tactile inspection using FDI probe for any fracture /rocking or loss of retention.
Number of restorations with retention loss
Time frame: 12 months
First, visual inspection to ensure that there is no complete loss of retention of the restoration then tactile evaluation will be done using probe tip that will be held gently at right angle to the labial surface and move from restoration to tooth and vice versa to insure no rocking /fracture /ditching in the restoration following FDI criteria
2 secondary outcomes
Number of restoration with change in colour or texture
Time frame: 12 months
Number of restoration caused biological harm
Time frame: 12 months
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 21 Jul 2022.
- Results publication: PubMed 29935766Li Y, Hu X, Xia Y, Ji Y, Ruan J, Weir MD, Lin X, Nie Z, Gu N, Masri R, Chang X, Xu HHK. Novel magnetic nanoparticle-containing adhesive with greater dentin bond strength and antibacterial and remineralizing capabilities. Dent Mater. 2018 Sep;34(9):1310-1322. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2018.06.001. Epub 2018 Jun 21.
- Results publication: PubMed 32486393Wawrzynkiewicz A, Rozpedek-Kaminska W, Galita G, Lukomska-Szymanska M, Lapinska B, Sokolowski J, Majsterek I. The Cytotoxicity and Genotoxicity of Three Dental Universal Adhesives-An In Vitro Study. Int J Mol Sci. 2020 May 31;21(11):3950. doi: 10.3390/ijms21113950.
- Results publication: PubMed 27778115Santis LR, Silva TM, Haddad BA, Goncalves LL, Goncalves SE. Influence of dentin thickness on intrapulpal temperature under simulated pulpal pressure during Nd:YAG laser irradiation. Lasers Med Sci. 2017 Jan;32(1):161-167. doi: 10.1007/s10103-016-2098-1. Epub 2016 Oct 24.
- Results publication: PubMed 32031090Akarsu S, Karademir SA, Ertas E, Atasoy S. The effect of diode laser application on restoration of non carious cervical lesion: Clinical follow up. Niger J Clin Pract. 2020 Feb;23(2):165-171. doi: 10.4103/njcp.njcp_399_19.
- Results publication: PubMed 31994534Peumans M, Politano G, Van Meerbeek B. Treatment of noncarious cervical lesions: when, why, and how. Int J Esthet Dent. 2020;15(1):16-42.
- Results publication: PubMed 24814138Wagner A, Wendler M, Petschelt A, Belli R, Lohbauer U. Bonding performance of universal adhesives in different etching modes. J Dent. 2014 Jul;42(7):800-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2014.04.012. Epub 2014 May 6.
- Results publication: PubMed 33551590Ranjitha GR, Vikram R, Meena N, Vijayalakshmi L, Murthy CS. Clinical efficacy of universal adhesives for the restoration of noncarious cervical lesions: A randomized clinical trial. J Conserv Dent. 2020 May-Jun;23(3):227-232. doi: 10.4103/JCD.JCD_51_20. Epub 2020 Dec 4.
- Results publication: PubMed 20847997Hickel R, Peschke A, Tyas M, Mjor I, Bayne S, Peters M, Hiller KA, Randall R, Vanherle G, Heintze SD. FDI World Dental Federation - clinical criteria for the evaluation of direct and indirect restorations. Update and clinical examples. J Adhes Dent. 2010 Aug;12(4):259-72. doi: 10.3290/j.jad.a19262.
- Results publication: PubMed 28962842Loguercio AD, Luque-Martinez IV, Fuentes S, Reis A, Munoz MA. Effect of dentin roughness on the adhesive performance in non-carious cervical lesions: A double-blind randomized clinical trial. J Dent. 2018 Feb;69:60-69. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2017.09.011. Epub 2017 Sep 27.
- Results publication: PubMed 22632386Milia E, Cumbo E, Cardoso RJ, Gallina G. Current dental adhesives systems. A narrative review. Curr Pharm Des. 2012;18(34):5542-52. doi: 10.2174/138161212803307491.
- Results publication: PubMed 26774320Sawlani K, Lawson NC, Burgess JO, Lemons JE, Kinderknecht KE, Givan DA, Ramp L. Factors influencing the progression of noncarious cervical lesions: A 5-year prospective clinical evaluation. J Prosthet Dent. 2016 May;115(5):571-7. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.10.021. Epub 2016 Jan 7.
- Results publication: PubMed 32933775de Paris Matos T, Perdigao J, de Paula E, Coppla F, Hass V, Scheffer RF, Reis A, Loguercio AD. Five-year clinical evaluation of a universal adhesive: A randomized double-blind trial. Dent Mater. 2020 Nov;36(11):1474-1485. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2020.08.007. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Non-carious Cervical Lesions
Recruiting
Root Coverage Performance of Restorative Materials in Class V Cavities
Gingival Recession, Non-Carious Cervical Lesions (NCCLs)
Not yet recruiting
Evaluation of Different Non-Invasive Methods in the Treatment of Dentin Hypersensitivity Associated With Non-Carious Cervical Lesions: A Split-Mouth Clinical Study
Non-Carious Cervical Lesions (NCCLs), Dentin Hypersensitivity
Active, not recruiting
Split-mouth Study of a New Flowable Composite in Non-carious Cervical Lesions
Non-carious Cervical Lesions
Active, not recruitingPhase 2/3
Effectiveness of Resin-Based Desensitizer and Laser, Compared to Fluoride Varnish in Management of Dentine Hypersensitivity in Non-carious Cervical Lesions
Dentin Hypersensitivity, Non-carious Cervical Lesions, Bioactive Glass Air Polishing, S-PRG, Dentin Hypersensitivity
Active, not recruiting
Clinical Evaluation of Composite Restorations Using Two-steps Universal Adhesive in Non-carious Cervical Lesion (NCCL)
Non-carious Cervical Lesion
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Bonding in NCCLs in people with Non-carious Cervical Lesions and Geriatric Patients, run by Cairo University at 1 site in Egypt.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 14 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Jul 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Egypt. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Number of fractured restorations (time frame: 12 months). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05029479, which also lists 13 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Jul 2022; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 7 Nov 2026.