AzTrials
AzTrials

Persistent Atrial FibrillationNCT05021601

Bi-atrial Versus Left Atrial Ablation for Patients With Rheumatic Mitral Valve Disease and Non-paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation

A study testing Bi-atrial ablation and Left atrial ablation in people with Persistent Atrial Fibrillation, run by China National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases at 2 sites in China.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study is aimed to compare the efficacy of bi-atrial ablation with left atrial ablation for atrial fibrillation during mitral valve surgery in patients with rheumatic mitral valve disease. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Persistent Atrial Fibrillation
What is being tested?
Bi-atrial ablation and Left atrial ablation
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
320 participants
Where
2 sitesChina
Study dates
10 May 2022to Jul 2025
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Age ≥ 18 years
  • Diagnosis of persistent atrial fibrillation(AF) or long-standing persistent AF by medical history and Holter monitoring (persistent AF lasting more than 7 days; long-standing persistent AF lasting more than 1 year).
  • Rheumatic mitral valve disease(RMVD) requires mitral valve surgery( RMVD was determined by history of acute rheumatic fever, valve morphology, echocardiographic findings and pathological diagnosis).
  • Consent to surgical ablation of AF

Who cannot join

  • Paroxysmal AF
  • Degenerative or ischemic mitral valve disease
  • Evidence of active infection
  • Previous catheter ablation or surgical ablation for AF
  • Surgical management of hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy
  • Absolute contraindications for anticoagulation therapy
Show all 15Show fewer
  • Left atrial thrombosis (not including left atrial appendage thrombosis alone)
  • Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease(Forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1)<30% anticipated value)
  • Uncontrolled hypo- or hyperthyroidism
  • Mental impairment or other conditions that may not allow participants to understand the nature, significance, and scope of study
  • Left atrial diameter>70mm
  • Right ventricular dysfunction (TAPSE<16) or moderate to severe tricuspid regurgitation or pulmonary artery pressure (estimated by echocardiography) >60mmHg
  • Coronary artery bypass grafting is required for participants with coronary heart disease
  • Previous cardiac surgery
  • Refuse to participate in this study

Trial locations and contacts

2 sites in 1 country.

Zhe Zheng, MD,PhD contact

: +86-010-88396051

zhengzhe@fuwai.com

Chunyu Yu, MD contact

yuchunyu@fuwai.com

China2 sites, 2 recruiting
  • Fuwai Hospital

    Beijing, Beijing Municipality

    Chunyu Yu, MD, yuchunyu@fuwai.com

    Recruiting
  • Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University

    Nanjing, Jiangsu

    Xin Chen

    Recruiting

Other trials in China

About this study

Official title: Bi-atrial Versus Left Atrial Ablation for Patients With Rheumatic Mitral Valve Disease and Non-paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation: a Multicenter, Prospective, Randomized Controlled Trial

This study is aimed to compare the efficacy of bi-atrial ablation with left atrial ablation for atrial fibrillation during mitral valve surgery in patients with rheumatic mitral valve disease.

Read the detailed description

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is present in 40%-60% of patients with rheumatic mitral valve disease (RMVD), which is an independent predictor of mortality and late stroke. During mitral valve (MV) surgery, the open left atrium facilitates a bi-atrial ablation procedure. However, a simplified lesion set including isolated pulmonary vein isolation or posterior left atrial (LA) wall isolation or LA maze was usually applied. The current literatures provide insufficient evidence to determine the potential benefits of bi-atrial ablation procedure when comparing with LA ablation procrdure in patients with non-paroxysmal AF and RMVD.

Patients with RMVD often have longer history, which tends to affect the right atrium, including pulmonary hypertension or tricuspid regurgitation.The necessity of bi-atrial ablation procedure targeting the bi-atrial substrate for AF in RMVD requires to be explored. In this study, we aimed to compare the efficacy of bi-atrial ablation with LA ablation for AF during MV surgery in patients with RMVD.

Being tested
Bi-atrial ablation, Left atrial ablation
Keywords
Rheumatic mitral valve disease, Surgical ablation, Mitral valve surgery
Medical subject headings
Atrial Fibrillation

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Bi-atrial ablationProcedure or surgery

    This intervention includes mitral valve surgery concomitant with left atrial ablation and right atrial ablation.

  • Left atrial ablationProcedure or surgery

    This intervention includes mitral valve surgery concomitant with left atrial ablation alone.

Study groups in NCT05021601
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Bi-atrial ablation groupExperimentalParticipants in this group will receive mitral valve surgery concomitant with bi-atrial ablation procedure.
Receives: Procedure: Bi-atrial ablation
Left atrial ablation groupActive comparatorParticipants in this group will receive mitral valve surgery concomitant with left atrial ablation procedure.
Receives: Procedure: Left atrial ablation

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Survival rate without any recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmias in the absence of antiarrhythmic drugs

    Without detections of atrial fibrillation, atrial flutter, or other atrial tachyarrhythmias with a duration of greater than 30 seconds documented by 3-day Holter monitoring in the absence of antiarrhythmic drugs.

    Measured: At 12-month after intervention

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. Survival rate without permanent pacemaker implantation (Key secondary outcome)

    Percentage of participants who did not have a new permanent pacemaker implanted.

    Measured: At 12-month after intervention

  2. Survival rate without any recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmias with antiarrhythmic drugs

    Without detections of atrial fibrillation, atrial flutter, or other atrial tachyarrhythmias with a duration of greater than 30 seconds documented by 3-day Holter monitoring with antiarrhythmic drugs.

    Measured: At 12-month after intervention

  3. Burden of atrial fibrillation

    Burden of atrial fibrillation according to 3-day Holter monitoring.

    Measured: At 12-month after intervention

  4. Major adverse events

    Including cardiac death, stroke, heart failure requiring rehospitalization, embolic events or bleeding events requiring rehospitalization.

    Measured: At 12-month after intervention

  5. Cardiac function

    Documented by echocardiography (left ventricular ejection fraction).

    Measured: At 12-month after intervention

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted25 Aug 2021
  2. Study start10 May 2022
  3. Primary completionJun 2025 (estimated)
  4. Study completionJul 2025 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
320 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05021601
Sponsor's protocol ID
2021-1515
Status last verified
Jun 2024
First submitted
16 Aug 2021
Last updated
13 Jun 2024
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Yu C, Li H, Wang Y, Chen S, Zhao Y, Zheng Z. Bi-atrial versus left atrial ablation for patients with rheumatic mitral valve disease and non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (ABLATION): rationale, design and study protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2022 Nov 29;12(11):e064861. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064861.

    PubMed 36446460

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Bi-atrial ablation and Left atrial ablation in people with Persistent Atrial Fibrillation, run by China National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases at 2 sites in China.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 15 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Jun 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 2 sites in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Zhe Zheng, MD,PhD (: +86-010-88396051, zhengzhe@fuwai.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Survival rate without any recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmias in the absence of antiarrhythmic drugs (time frame: At 12-month after intervention). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05021601, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Jun 2024.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in