End-of-LifeNCT04966260
Virtual Reality Therapy to Improve Physical and Psychological Symptoms and Quality of Life for End-of-life Patients on a Palliative Care Unit
A study testing Standardized Virtual Reality and Personalized Virtual Reality in people with End-of-Life and Physical Suffering, run by Baycrest at 1 site in Canada.
Trial summary
People with advanced and life-threatening illnesses experience challenges across multiple domains of function including physical, psychological, social, and spiritual. The benefits of non-pharmacological interventions for palliative care patients are well recognized, but are relatively under-utilized. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 55 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- End-of-Life, Physical Suffering, Psychological Distress
- What is being tested?
- Standardized Virtual Reality and Personalized Virtual Reality
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 63 participants
- Where
- 1 siteCanada
- Study dates
- 15 Jun 2021to 7 Feb 2023
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 55 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Admitted to Baycrest PCU
- Capable to consent to the study
- Able to complete the outcome measures through a telephone interview with a research assistant
- Estimated prognosis ≥3 weeks
- At least 2 or more ESAS scores of 4 or greater within the week of the intervention
- English speaking
Who cannot join
- Intractable nausea/vomiting
- History of seizures or epilepsy
- Vision and/or hearing impairment that cannot be accommodated e.g. pocket talker
- Any abnormalities of the head preventing use of the headset
- Patients who are too unwell to participate based on the opinion of the clinical team
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Virtual Reality Therapy to Improve Physical and Psychological Symptoms and Quality of Life for End-of-life Patients on a Palliative Care Unit: a Randomized Controlled Study
People with advanced and life-threatening illnesses experience challenges across multiple domains of function including physical, psychological, social, and spiritual. The benefits of non-pharmacological interventions for palliative care patients are well recognized, but are relatively under-utilized. Virtual Reality (VR) therapy may help address these challenges and be a valuable addition to the current therapies used in palliative care.
VR is a computer generated, three-dimensional environment that individuals can explore and interact with using specialized equipment such as a head-mounted display with internal sensors. VR has been increasingly adapted for applications in healthcare, as a simulation for medical training and an intervention tool to impact pain management, stress and anxiety. VR has the potential to improve both physical and psychological symptoms in patients with terminal illnesses.
Read more
The current study is a small randomized controlled trial to understand the impact of VR on physical symptoms, psychological symptoms and quality of life in patients at the end of life. Participants will be randomized to a single comparator session, single session of standard VR, or single session of personalized VR. The comparator arm will consist of participants viewing an ordinary two-dimensional video on an iPad such as a peaceful nature scene. The standard VR arm will consist of participants viewing a "bucket list" experience self-selected from a VR library i.e. an experience the participant desires but has never experienced. The personalized VR arm will consist of participants viewing content that is personally meaningful to them. This content will be obtained through either a) family/friends creating a personalized video (e.g. video footage of their summer cottage) or b) the participant will select an experience from the VR library that is personally meaningful (e.g. visiting their honeymoon destination, exploring their childhood hometown, etc.) if option a) is not possible.
Participants will complete self-report questionnaires about their physical and psychological symptoms and quality of life before and after the intervention (two days and seven days post intervention). Participants will also complete a feedback survey to evaluate their satisfaction with the intervention. Surveys will be administered by the research assistant.
- Conditions
- End-of-Life, Physical Suffering, Psychological Distress
- Being tested
- Standardized Virtual Reality, Control, Personalized Virtual Reality
- Keywords
- Palliative Care, Symptom management, Virtual Reality
- Medical subject headings
- Death, Pain
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Standardized Virtual RealityOther
This is a one session intervention, where participants will be asked to wear a VR headset and view a three-dimensional standard VR video. The activity session will be approximately 15 minutes in length. Prior to starting the intervention, the therapeutic recreation staff will explain the activity and familiarize participants with the VR headset.
ControlOther
This is a one session intervention, where participants will be asked to view a two-dimensional video on an iPad. The activity session will be approximately 15 minutes in length. Prior to starting the activity session, the therapeutic recreation staff will explain the activity.
Personalized Virtual RealityOther
This is a one session intervention, where participants will be asked to wear a VR headset and view a three-dimensional personalized VR video. The activity session will be approximately 15 minutes in length. Prior to starting the intervention, the therapeutic recreation staff will explain the activity and familiarize participants with the VR headset.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Standardized Virtual Reality | Experimental | Participants in the standard virtual reality (VR) group will choose from the general library of VR experiences. Participants will be asked to select an experience they desire but have never experienced in person. The session will be facilitated by the therapeutic recreation staff on the unit. Receives: Other: Standardized Virtual Reality |
| Personalized Virtual Reality | Experimental | There are two types of personalized VR: 1) Family/friends provide personalized content (e.g., life stories, photos, videos) that will be used during the VR session. Family/friends of participants in the personalized VR group will have the opportunity to upload custom photos, videos, life stories or capture their own 360° footage of family events using a GoPro camera that will be loaned to them for the study. This content will be uploaded to a cloud-based portal. 2) If the family/friends of those in the personalized VR arm are unavailable/unable/unwilling to provide personalized content the participant will select a video from the VR library of an experience that is personally memorable to them, such as their childhood hometown, a favourite vacation destination. The session will be facilitated by the therapeutic recreation staff on the unit. Receives: Other: Personalized Virtual Reality |
| Two-Dimensional Video | Active comparator | Participants in the active comparator group will choose a two-dimensional video such as a mountain view, ocean view or safari. Participants will view the two-dimensional video on an iPad and the session will be facilitated by the therapeutic recreation staff on the unit. Receives: Other: Control |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS) Score
The ESAS is a self-report measure used to assist in the assessment of pain, tiredness, nausea, depression, anxiety, drowsiness, appetite, wellbeing, and shortness of breath (Bruera, Kuehn, Miller, Selmser, \& Macmillan, 1991). The severity of the symptom at the time of the assessment is rated from zero to ten, with zero meaning the symptom is absent and ten meaning worst possible severity. For the purpose of the study the ESAS was modified to include two additional items, headache and dizziness.
Analysis of the ESAS scores across the different time points will help determine whether VR effects are transient (within 24 hours) or sustained (after 2 and 7 days).
Measured: Pre-intervention, post-intervention (same day immediately after intervention), 2 day follow up, 7 day follow up
Change in Missoula-VITAS Quality of Life Index (MVQOLI)
The MVQOLI evaluates subjective quality of life among people living with advanced, life-threatening illness by assessing the domains of symptoms, function, interpersonal, wellbeing, and transcendence (Schwartz, Merriman, Reed, \& Byock, 2005). Each domain includes three Likert-scale evaluation questions.
Analysis of the MVQOLI scores across the different time points will help determine whether VR effects are transient (within 24 hours) or sustained (after 2 and 7 days).
Measured: Pre-intervention, post-intervention (same day immediately after intervention), 2 day follow up, 7 day follow up
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted19 Jul 2021
- Study start15 Jun 2021
- Primary completion7 Feb 2023
- Study completion7 Feb 2023
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (3)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for End-of-LifeStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- This is a small randomized controlled trial conducted in a study population of patients admitted to a geriatric palliative care unit. The clinical team will determine if the patient is eligible for the study. Patients and families/friends of patients who are randomized to the personalized VR will be consented over the telephone by the research assistant., Participants will then be randomly assigned into one of the three study arms: comparator, standardized VR or personalized VR, on a 1:1:1 basis using computer-generated random numbers and a block size of 3 without additional stratification.
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 63 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Baycrest
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Ginah Kim, Baycrest
- Investigators
- Ginah Kim, MD, Principal investigator, Baycrest
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04966260
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 21-15
- Status last verified
- Aug 2024
- First submitted
- 29 Jun 2021
- Last updated
- 7 Aug 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Anderson F, Downing GM, Hill J, Casorso L, Lerch N. Palliative performance scale (PPS): a new tool. J Palliat Care. 1996 Spring;12(1):5-11.
PubMed 8857241Hui D, Shamieh O, Paiva CE, Perez-Cruz PE, Kwon JH, Muckaden MA, Park M, Yennu S, Kang JH, Bruera E. Minimal clinically important differences in the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale in cancer patients: A prospective, multicenter study. Cancer. 2015 Sep 1;121(17):3027-35. doi: 10.1002/cncr.29437. Epub 2015 Jun 8.
PubMed 26059846Schwartz CE, Merriman MP, Reed G, Byock I. Evaluation of the Missoula-VITAS Quality of Life Index--revised: research tool or clinical tool? J Palliat Med. 2005 Feb;8(1):121-35. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2005.8.121.
PubMed 15662181
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 7 Aug 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Virtual Reality Therapy to Improve Physical and Psychological Symptoms and Quality of Life for End-of-life Patients on a Palliative Care Unit: a Randomized Controlled Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04966260
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 21-15
- Conditions
- End-of-Life, Physical Suffering, Psychological Distress
- Keywords
- Palliative Care, Symptom management, Virtual Reality
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 63 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- BaycrestUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 15 Jun 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 7 Feb 2023 (actual)
- Study completion
- 7 Feb 2023 (actual)
- First posted
- 19 Jul 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
People with advanced and life-threatening illnesses experience challenges across multiple domains of function including physical, psychological, social, and spiritual. The benefits of non-pharmacological interventions for palliative care patients are well recognized, but are relatively under-utilized. Virtual Reality (VR) therapy may help address these challenges and be a valuable addition to the current therapies used in palliative care.
VR is a computer generated, three-dimensional environment that individuals can explore and interact with using specialized equipment such as a head-mounted display with internal sensors. VR has been increasingly adapted for applications in healthcare, as a simulation for medical training and an intervention tool to impact pain management, stress and anxiety. VR has the potential to improve both physical and psychological symptoms in patients with terminal illnesses.
The current study is a small randomized controlled trial to understand the impact of VR on physical symptoms, psychological symptoms and quality of life in patients at the end of life. Participants will be randomized to a single comparator session, single session of standard VR, or single session of personalized VR. The comparator arm will consist of participants viewing an ordinary two-dimensional video on an iPad such as a peaceful nature scene. The standard VR arm will consist of participants viewing a "bucket list" experience self-selected from a VR library i.e. an experience the participant desires but has never experienced. The personalized VR arm will consist of participants viewing content that is personally meaningful to them. This content will be obtained through either a) family/friends creating a personalized video (e.g. video footage of their summer cottage) or b) the participant will select an experience from the VR library that is personally meaningful (e.g. visiting their honeymoon destination, exploring their childhood hometown, etc.) if option a) is not possible.
Participants will complete self-report questionnaires about their physical and psychological symptoms and quality of life before and after the intervention (two days and seven days post intervention). Participants will also complete a feedback survey to evaluate their satisfaction with the intervention. Surveys will be administered by the research assistant.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 3
- Model description
- This is a small randomized controlled trial conducted in a study population of patients admitted to a geriatric palliative care unit. The clinical team will determine if the patient is eligible for the study. Patients and families/friends of patients who are randomized to the personalized VR will be consented over the telephone by the research assistant., Participants will then be randomly assigned into one of the three study arms: comparator, standardized VR or personalized VR, on a 1:1:1 basis using computer-generated random numbers and a block size of 3 without additional stratification.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Standardized Virtual Reality | Experimental | Other: Standardized Virtual RealityParticipants in the standard virtual reality (VR) group will choose from the general library of VR experiences. Participants will be asked to select an experience they desire but have never experienced in person. The session will be facilitated by the therapeutic recreation staff on the unit. |
| Personalized Virtual Reality | Experimental | Other: Personalized Virtual RealityThere are two types of personalized VR: 1) Family/friends provide personalized content (e.g., life stories, photos, videos) that will be used during the VR session. Family/friends of participants in the personalized VR group will have the opportunity to upload custom photos, videos, life stories or capture their own 360° footage of family events using a GoPro camera that will be loaned to them for the study. This content will be uploaded to a cloud-based portal. 2) If the family/friends of those in the personalized VR arm are unavailable/unable/unwilling to provide personalized content the participant will select a video from the VR library of an experience that is personally memorable to them, such as their childhood hometown, a favourite vacation destination. The session will be facilitated by the therapeutic recreation staff on the unit. |
| Two-Dimensional Video | Active comparator | Other: ControlParticipants in the active comparator group will choose a two-dimensional video such as a mountain view, ocean view or safari. Participants will view the two-dimensional video on an iPad and the session will be facilitated by the therapeutic recreation staff on the unit. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 55 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Admitted to Baycrest PCU
- Capable to consent to the study
- Able to complete the outcome measures through a telephone interview with a research assistant
- Estimated prognosis ≥3 weeks
- At least 2 or more ESAS scores of 4 or greater within the week of the intervention
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Intractable nausea/vomiting
- History of seizures or epilepsy
- Vision and/or hearing impairment that cannot be accommodated e.g. pocket talker
- Any abnormalities of the head preventing use of the headset
- Patients who are too unwell to participate based on the opinion of the clinical team
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Standardized Virtual RealityThis is a one session intervention, where participants will be asked to wear a VR headset and view a three-dimensional standard VR video. The activity session will be approximately 15 minutes in length. Prior to starting the intervention, the therapeutic recreation staff will explain the activity and familiarize participants with the VR headset. | Other | Standardized Virtual Reality |
| ControlThis is a one session intervention, where participants will be asked to view a two-dimensional video on an iPad. The activity session will be approximately 15 minutes in length. Prior to starting the activity session, the therapeutic recreation staff will explain the activity. | Other | Two-Dimensional Video |
| Personalized Virtual RealityThis is a one session intervention, where participants will be asked to wear a VR headset and view a three-dimensional personalized VR video. The activity session will be approximately 15 minutes in length. Prior to starting the intervention, the therapeutic recreation staff will explain the activity and familiarize participants with the VR headset. | Other | Personalized Virtual Reality |
Primary outcome
Change in Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS) Score
Time frame: Pre-intervention, post-intervention (same day immediately after intervention), 2 day follow up, 7 day follow up
The ESAS is a self-report measure used to assist in the assessment of pain, tiredness, nausea, depression, anxiety, drowsiness, appetite, wellbeing, and shortness of breath (Bruera, Kuehn, Miller, Selmser, \& Macmillan, 1991). The severity of the symptom at the time of the assessment is rated from zero to ten, with zero meaning the symptom is absent and ten meaning worst possible severity. For the purpose of the study the ESAS was modified to include two additional items, headache and dizziness. Analysis of the ESAS scores across the different time points will help determine whether VR effects are transient (within 24 hours) or sustained (after 2 and 7 days).
Change in Missoula-VITAS Quality of Life Index (MVQOLI)
Time frame: Pre-intervention, post-intervention (same day immediately after intervention), 2 day follow up, 7 day follow up
The MVQOLI evaluates subjective quality of life among people living with advanced, life-threatening illness by assessing the domains of symptoms, function, interpersonal, wellbeing, and transcendence (Schwartz, Merriman, Reed, \& Byock, 2005). Each domain includes three Likert-scale evaluation questions. Analysis of the MVQOLI scores across the different time points will help determine whether VR effects are transient (within 24 hours) or sustained (after 2 and 7 days).
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 7 Aug 2024.
- Background: PubMed 8857241Anderson F, Downing GM, Hill J, Casorso L, Lerch N. Palliative performance scale (PPS): a new tool. J Palliat Care. 1996 Spring;12(1):5-11.
- Background: PubMed 26059846Hui D, Shamieh O, Paiva CE, Perez-Cruz PE, Kwon JH, Muckaden MA, Park M, Yennu S, Kang JH, Bruera E. Minimal clinically important differences in the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale in cancer patients: A prospective, multicenter study. Cancer. 2015 Sep 1;121(17):3027-35. doi: 10.1002/cncr.29437. Epub 2015 Jun 8.
- Background: PubMed 15662181Schwartz CE, Merriman MP, Reed G, Byock I. Evaluation of the Missoula-VITAS Quality of Life Index--revised: research tool or clinical tool? J Palliat Med. 2005 Feb;8(1):121-35. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2005.8.121.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for End-of-Life
RecruitingObservational study
AI-powered ECG Analysis Using Willem™ Software in High-risk Cardiac Patients (WILLEM)
Cardiomyopathies, Cardiac Arrest
Not yet recruiting
Miniature In-line Respirator
Brain Death, Respiration, Artificial
Not yet recruiting
Hypothermic Kidney Machine Perfusion With Omnisol
End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD), Kidney Transplant
RecruitingPhase 2
Tislelizumab in People With Colorectal Cancer
Colorectal Cancer
Not yet recruitingPhase 1/2
STAR0602 With Nivolumab in Non Small Cell Lung Cancer and in Metastatic Castrate-Resistant Prostate Cancer, and STAR0602 Alone in Thymic Carcinoma
NSCLC, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Ginah Kim, MD principal investigator
Baycrest
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Standardized Virtual Reality and Personalized Virtual Reality in people with End-of-Life and Physical Suffering, run by Baycrest at 1 site in Canada.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 Aug 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS) Score (time frame: Pre-intervention, post-intervention (same day immediately after intervention), 2 day follow up, 7 day follow up). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04966260, which also lists 3 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 Aug 2024.