Obstructive Sleep Apnea of AdultNCT04925466
Acceptable Pressure Range for Continuous Positive Airway Pressure(CPAP) Treatment
A study testing CPAP at pressure of 10 cmH2O and CPAP at minimal effective pressure in people with Obstructive Sleep Apnea of Adult, run by State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease at 1 site in China.
Trial summary
Compliance of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) derived from auto-titration is similar to that derived from manual titration, although pressure derived from the former was usually 2-5 cmH2O higher than the latter. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Obstructive Sleep Apnea of Adult
- What is being tested?
- CPAP at pressure of 10 cmH2O and CPAP at minimal effective pressure
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 40 participants
- Where
- 1 siteChina
- Study dates
- 5 Jun 2021to 23 Sep 2021
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- reported snore, apnea and daytime sleepiness;
- a diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea with polysomnography according to ASSM guideline(apnoea-hypopnea-index(AHI)≥5 events/h) and need to be treated with continuous positive airway pressure;
- willing to participate after informed consent.
Who cannot join
- Evidence of severe coronary or cerebral, cardiovascular disease and significant memory, perceptual or behavioural disorder;
- Severe respiratory disease defined as severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease(ie. FEV1/FVC<70% and FEV1<50%predicted) or resting awake SaO2<90%
- Have known contraindications with CPAP, like current pneumothorax and hemoptysis, et al.
- Central sleep apnea>10 events/h;
- Frequent nasal congestion;
- Optimal treatment CPAP pressure(by manual titration) equal or higher than 10cmH2O.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
China1 site
The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University
Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510230
About this study
Official title: Comparison of 10cmH2O and Manual Titrated Pressure in Treatment of Obstructive Sleep Apnea(OSA) Patients
Compliance of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) derived from auto-titration is similar to that derived from manual titration, although pressure derived from the former was usually 2-5 cmH2O higher than the latter. Therefore the Investigators hypothesize that accurate titration maybe not necessary for successful treatment of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) as long as CPAP pressure was not lower than the minimal effective pressure.
Read the detailed description
Study Design: A randomized, cross-over and double-blind study. Objective: To compare the pressure of 10 cmH2O and minimal effective pressure derived from manual titration on the effect of CPAP treatment in OSA. Methods: Patients with suspected OSA (age, body mass index and symptom) to be referred to a sleep centre were recruited. Patients with OSA confirmed by overnight full polysomnography (PSG) were invited to do standard overnight manual titration under PSG based on the Academy of Sleep Medicine (AASM) manual guidelines. Patients whose manual titration pressure lower than 10cmH2O and willing to participate in the study were invited to repeat two more nights (3th PSG and 4th PSG) under CPAP pressure at both 10cmH2O and the pressure derived from manual titration in random order. The sleep apnea-hypopnea index (AHI), obstructive sleep apnea index (OHI), arousal index (ArI), oxygen desaturation index (ODI), sleep structure, and treatment preference were to be observed.
- Conditions
- Obstructive Sleep Apnea of Adult
- Being tested
- CPAP at pressure of 10 cmH2O, CPAP at minimal effective pressure
- Keywords
- OSA, CPAP, acceptable range
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
CPAP at pressure of 10 cmH2ODevice
Patients used CPAP with the pressure of 10 cmH2O during overnight polysomnography
CPAP at minimal effective pressureDevice
Patients with OSA will be treated with CPAP at minimal effective pressure derived from manual titration during sleep.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Treatment with CPAP at 10cmH2O | Experimental | Patients with OSA will be treated with CPAP at 10cmH2O during sleep. Receives: Device: CPAP at pressure of 10 cmH2O |
| Treatment with CPAP at minimal effective pressure | Experimental | Patients with OSA will be treated with CPAP at minimal effective pressure derived from manual titration during sleep. Receives: Device: CPAP at minimal effective pressure |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
sleep structure
Assessment of the sleep efficiency (percentage is calculated by dividing Total Sleep Time by Total Time in bed)
Measured: 4 full night
arousal index
total number of arousal events/total sleep time(h)
Measured: 4 full night
Apnea hypopnea index
Total number of apneas and hypopneas/total sleep time (h)
Measured: 4 full night
Oxygen Desaturation Index
Total number of oxygen desaturations≥3% /total sleep time(h)
Measured: 4 full night
Secondary outcomes (1)
Patients preference
Using a questionnaire named preference to record patients preference to 10cmH2O or manual titrated pressure
Measured: 4 full night
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted14 Jun 2021
- Study start5 Jun 2021
- Primary completion19 Jul 2021
- Study completion23 Sep 2021
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Obstructive Sleep Apnea of AdultStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Yuan-Ming Luo, State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease
- Investigators
- Yuanming Luo, PhD, Principal investigator, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04925466
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2021016
- Status last verified
- Apr 2022
- First submitted
- 4 Jun 2021
- Last updated
- 8 Apr 2022
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Publications
Wang L, Chen Y, Wei Q, Wu Y, Huang C, Liang S, Steier J, Catcheside P, Eckert D, Wellman A, Luo Y. Fixed CPAP at 10 cmH 2O May Replace Manual Titration in Moderate to Severe OSA Patients: A Preliminary Randomised Controlled Trial. Respirology. 2025 Aug;30(8):770-778. doi: 10.1111/resp.70037. Epub 2025 Mar 25.
PubMed 40130675
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 8 Apr 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Comparison of 10cmH2O and Manual Titrated Pressure in Treatment of Obstructive Sleep Apnea(OSA) Patients
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04925466
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 2021016
- Conditions
- Obstructive Sleep Apnea of Adult
- Keywords
- OSA, CPAP, acceptable range
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- State Key Laboratory of Respiratory DiseaseUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 5 Jun 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 19 Jul 2021 (actual)
- Study completion
- 23 Sep 2021 (actual)
- First posted
- 14 Jun 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Compliance of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) derived from auto-titration is similar to that derived from manual titration, although pressure derived from the former was usually 2-5 cmH2O higher than the latter. Therefore the Investigators hypothesize that accurate titration maybe not necessary for successful treatment of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) as long as CPAP pressure was not lower than the minimal effective pressure.
Detailed description
Study Design: A randomized, cross-over and double-blind study. Objective: To compare the pressure of 10 cmH2O and minimal effective pressure derived from manual titration on the effect of CPAP treatment in OSA. Methods: Patients with suspected OSA (age, body mass index and symptom) to be referred to a sleep centre were recruited. Patients with OSA confirmed by overnight full polysomnography (PSG) were invited to do standard overnight manual titration under PSG based on the Academy of Sleep Medicine (AASM) manual guidelines. Patients whose manual titration pressure lower than 10cmH2O and willing to participate in the study were invited to repeat two more nights (3th PSG and 4th PSG) under CPAP pressure at both 10cmH2O and the pressure derived from manual titration in random order. The sleep apnea-hypopnea index (AHI), obstructive sleep apnea index (OHI), arousal index (ArI), oxygen desaturation index (ODI), sleep structure, and treatment preference were to be observed.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Treatment with CPAP at 10cmH2O | Experimental | Device: CPAP at pressure of 10 cmH2OPatients with OSA will be treated with CPAP at 10cmH2O during sleep. |
| Treatment with CPAP at minimal effective pressure | Experimental | Device: CPAP at minimal effective pressurePatients with OSA will be treated with CPAP at minimal effective pressure derived from manual titration during sleep. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 75 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- reported snore, apnea and daytime sleepiness;
- a diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea with polysomnography according to ASSM guideline(apnoea-hypopnea-index(AHI)≥5 events/h) and need to be treated with continuous positive airway pressure;
- willing to participate after informed consent.
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Evidence of severe coronary or cerebral, cardiovascular disease and significant memory, perceptual or behavioural disorder;
- Severe respiratory disease defined as severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease(ie. FEV1/FVC<70% and FEV1<50%predicted) or resting awake SaO2<90%
- Have known contraindications with CPAP, like current pneumothorax and hemoptysis, et al.
- Central sleep apnea>10 events/h;
- Frequent nasal congestion;
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| CPAP at pressure of 10 cmH2OPatients used CPAP with the pressure of 10 cmH2O during overnight polysomnography | Device | Treatment with CPAP at 10cmH2O |
| CPAP at minimal effective pressurePatients with OSA will be treated with CPAP at minimal effective pressure derived from manual titration during sleep. | Device | Treatment with CPAP at minimal effective pressure |
Primary outcome
sleep structure
Time frame: 4 full night
Assessment of the sleep efficiency (percentage is calculated by dividing Total Sleep Time by Total Time in bed)
arousal index
Time frame: 4 full night
total number of arousal events/total sleep time(h)
Apnea hypopnea index
Time frame: 4 full night
Total number of apneas and hypopneas/total sleep time (h)
Oxygen Desaturation Index
Time frame: 4 full night
Total number of oxygen desaturations≥3% /total sleep time(h)
1 secondary outcome
Patients preference
Time frame: 4 full night
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 8 Apr 2022.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 40130675Wang L, Chen Y, Wei Q, Wu Y, Huang C, Liang S, Steier J, Catcheside P, Eckert D, Wellman A, Luo Y. Fixed CPAP at 10 cmH 2O May Replace Manual Titration in Moderate to Severe OSA Patients: A Preliminary Randomised Controlled Trial. Respirology. 2025 Aug;30(8):770-778. doi: 10.1111/resp.70037. Epub 2025 Mar 25.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Obstructive Sleep Apnea of Adult
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study to Learn About the Monthly Dosing Study Medicine Called Berobenatide in Adults With Breathing Problems During Sleep and Overweight or Obesity Who Do Not Use a Breathing Machine (PAP) (VESPER-OSA 2)
Apnea, Sleep Disorders
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study to Learn About the Monthly Dosing Study Medicine Called Berobenatide in Adults With Breathing Problems During Sleep and Overweight or Obesity Who Use a Breathing Machine (PAP) (VESPER-OSA 1)
Apnea, Sleep Disorders
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study of Eloralintide (LY3841136) in Participants With Obstructive Sleep Apnea and Obesity or Overweight
Sleep Apnea, Obstructive, Obesity
Not yet recruiting
Testing Settings of NovaResp's cMAP® Software During Home PAP Therapy
Obstructive Sleep Apnea
Recruiting
The Effects of Successful OSA Treatment on Memory and AD Biomarkers in Older Adults Study
Obstructive Sleep Apnea, Cognitive Decline
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Yuanming Luo, PhD principal investigator
The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing CPAP at pressure of 10 cmH2O and CPAP at minimal effective pressure in people with Obstructive Sleep Apnea of Adult, run by State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease at 1 site in China.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Apr 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
sleep structure (time frame: 4 full night). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04925466, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Apr 2022.