AzTrials
AzTrials

Trauma, SexualNCT04902287

PHF Problematic Sexual Behavior of Youth Family Engagement

A study testing Training Intervention for the Engagement of Families (TIES) in people with Trauma, Sexual, run by University of Oklahoma at 1 site in United States.

Terminated

Stopped early. The study ended before it was planned to and will not resume.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Efficacious child mental health services are only helpful if families engage in services; however, as many as 75% of families in need never establish contact with a mental health professional and greater than half of families fail to attend their first appointment. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 7 to 12 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Trauma, Sexual
What is being tested?
Training Intervention for the Engagement of Families (TIES)
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
9 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
13 Oct 2021to 18 Feb 2022
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 7 to 12 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Child

Who may be able to join

  • Child between the ages of 7-12 who is referred to the treatment program for youth with PSB
  • At least one incident of developmentally inappropriate sexual behavior
  • Speak and understand English

Who cannot join

  • Court mandate to participate in treatment
  • Anticipation of a change of placement within three months
  • Have a current diagnosis of a developmental disorder, schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, or intellectual disability

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • CCAN Cares Clinic/OU Child Study Center

    Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73117

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: From Science to Practice: An Evidence Based Engagement Intervention to Support Treatment Success for Youth's Problematic Sexual Behavior

Efficacious child mental health services are only helpful if families engage in services; however, as many as 75% of families in need never establish contact with a mental health professional and greater than half of families fail to attend their first appointment. Fortunately, interventions have been developed to increase the likelihood that families will participate in treatment. Despite the development of these interventions, no research to date has evaluated these strategies with a critically important population, youth with problematic sexual behaviors (PSB). PSBs in children are a substantial public health concern, as greater than one-third of child sexual abuse cases are committed by other youth. Evidence based practices (EBP's) that include direct engagement of caregivers in services for youth PSB have strong efficacy, with recidivism rates of two percent. Thus, a therapeutic response that successfully engages families is necessary to promote community safety. Research has indicated that engagement of families in PSB treatment has greater complications due to managing internal and external experiences of shame, stigma, and misperceptions of youth. Therefore, the present study seeks to determine the impact of a first contact intervention to assess if strategies aid in the engagement of families in treatment for youth PSB as compared to referral as usual. This will be accomplished by conducting a small-scale Randomized Control Trial. This project is the first step in an innovative line of research that will provide practical strategies for practitioners to utilize in order to successfully recruit, retain, and heal families of youth with PSB.

Read the detailed description

Efficacious child mental health services are only helpful if families engage in services. However, as many as 75% of families in need never establish contact with a mental health professional and greater than half of families fail to attend their first scheduled visit. Fortunately, first contact interventions have reduced barriers and increased the likelihood that a family begin services following initial referral. Research has demonstrated the effectiveness of a phone intervention using 'Training Intervention for the Engagement of Families' (TIES) for engagement of families referred to outpatient behavioral health services due to childhood trauma and disruptive behavior disorders. However, engagement intervention strategies have not yet been applied to a critically important population, youth with problematic sexual behaviors (PSB), who face unique barriers to engagement in treatment. PSBs in children are a substantial public health concern, as greater than one-third of child sexual abuse cases have been found to be committed by other youth. Evidence based practices (EBP's) that include direct engagement of caregivers in services for children with PSB have strong efficacy, with recidivism rates of two percent. Thus, a therapeutic response is most logical to promote community safety and prevent future incidence of PSB. Despite the development of efficacious treatment, EBP's are not provided to most youth with PSB. Our research has indicated that engagement of families when a child has PSB has greater complications due to managing internal and external experiences of shame, stigma, and misperceptions surrounding the youth's behaviors, as well as navigation of a large number of systems (e.g., child welfare, juvenile justice, law enforcement). Given the potential negative impact of treatment attrition on overall community safety and child well-being, research efforts concentrated on identifying strategies that enhance service engagement for the treatment of youth with PSB are warranted. While TIES strategies have shown great promise in increasing family engagement, no research to date has examined the impact of purposeful, evidence-based engagement intervention on decreasing attrition amongst families of youth with PSB. A critical gap exists in the research literature, as families of youth with PSB face additional perceptual barriers to engaging in treatment such as a hesitancy to discuss stigmatizing behaviors due to feelings of responsibility and shame. Therefore, the present study seeks to determine the impact of this intervention to assess if these strategies successfully aid in both the successful engagement of families in treatment for youth PSB as compared to referral as usual. This will be accomplished by conducting a small-scale Randomized Control Trial (RCT). We will test the hypothesis that TIES engagement strategies will improve both initial and sustained engagement in EBP as compared to referral as usual amongst families of school aged children with PSB. The proposed study will accomplish this through the following specific aims:

Aim 1. To examine the efficacy of an evidence-based engagement intervention strategy for successfully engaging families of youth with PSB in treatment. Families' who are referred to the PSB-CBT treatment services will be randomly assigned to TIES strategies or referral as usual procedures to test the impact of an evidence-based engagement intervention on program attrition. Factors such as parenting stress, child emotional and behavioral health concerns, treatment satisfaction and alliance will be examined to understand their unique contribution to family attrition in treatment for this population.

Aim 2. In order to accomplish Aim 1, we will first systematically adapt the TIES intervention to meet the unique needs of families of youth with PSB to improve the ability of TIES to decrease overall attrition. Adaptations to TIES strategies will include supporting families to overcome barriers such as navigating community systems and addressing misperceptions such as shame and stigma of youth with PSB.

Conditions
Trauma, Sexual
Being tested
Training Intervention for the Engagement of Families (TIES)
Medical subject headings
Sexual Trauma

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Training Intervention for the Engagement of Families (TIES)Behavioural

    This intervention involves training service personnel in a method of communication that elicits a person's intrinsic motivation for change.

Study groups in NCT04902287
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
TIES Engagement StrategiesExperimentalParticipants in this arm will receive a 30-minute TIES engagement intervention during their referral phone call.
Receives: Behavioral: Training Intervention for the Engagement of Families (TIES)
Referral as UsualNo interventionParticipants in this arm will receive a standard call to schedule an intake appointment by an administrative assistant with no clinical training.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Attendance in Treatment

    Completed number of treatment sessions

    Measured: 18 weeks

  2. Provider Rated Engagement

    Measure completed weekly from the lead therapist regarding each family's participation in the treatment session

    Measured: 18 weeks

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ-8)

    The CSQ-8 is an 8-item reliable and valid outcome measure that assesses for client satisfaction with treatment services. The CSQ-8 has no subscales and reports a single score measuring a single dimension of overall satisfaction with treatment. Higher scores indicate a stronger level of satisfaction.

    Measured: 18 weeks

  2. Working Alliance Inventory (WAI-SR; WAI-CA)

    Treatment alliance between the therapist and family will be measured using the Working Alliance Inventory - Short Revised (WAI-SR) and Working Alliance Inventory - Children and Adolescents (WAI-CA). The WAI-SR and WAI-CA assesses the therapeutic alliance between a child and their caregiver with the therapeutic provider. This form will be completed by both caregiver and child at 1-month and discharge. Both the WAI-SR and WAI-CA have demonstrated high levels of internal consistency and external validity. Higher scores represent a higher level of treatment alliance.

    Measured: 18 weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted26 May 2021
  2. Study start13 Oct 2021
  3. Primary completion18 Feb 2022
  4. Study completion18 Feb 2022

Why it stopped: Funding ending due to PI leaving position at the University of Oklahoma.

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Screening
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
The current clinical trial involves two conditions (N=20 each): engagement condition or referral as usual
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
9 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04902287
Sponsor's protocol ID
20211217
Status last verified
May 2022
First submitted
21 May 2021
Last updated
26 May 2022
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Training Intervention for the Engagement of Families (TIES) in people with Trauma, Sexual, run by University of Oklahoma at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 May 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study was stopped early (reason given: Funding ending due to PI leaving position at the University of Oklahoma.). Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Attendance in Treatment (time frame: 18 weeks). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 May 2022.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in