Multiple MyelomaVAMOSNCT04888039
Follow-up of Patients With Multiple Myeloma in the West-Occitanie Region "Living With a Myeloma in West-Occitanie"
An observational study of Multiple Myeloma, run by University Hospital, Toulouse at 1 site in France.
Trial summary
Actually very few real life data are available for patients with multiple myeloma (MM), whereas they're playing a more and more important role in health care decisions. Treatments choice for medical care of patient with MM depends of their age, their general status, their eligibility to high dose treatment… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Multiple Myeloma
- What is being tested?
- quality of life questionnaires (EORTC QLQ-C30 ; EORTC QLQMY20 ; EQ-5D-5L ; Cohen's stress scale)
- How many people
- 2,000 participants
- Where
- 1 siteFrance
- Study dates
- 15 Dec 2021to Jun 2031
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Adult patients with a diagnosis of symptomatic multiple myeloma and living in the west-Occitanie region.
Who may be able to join
- Patient living in the West-Occitanie region
- Patient with a diagnosis of symptomatic multiple myeloma (Rajkumar et al, Lancet Oncology 2014)
Who cannot join
- Patient opposed to this research
- Patient under legal protection
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
France1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
IUCT-Oncopole - Toulouse University Hospital
Toulouse, West-Occitanie, 31059
Sandra BERNARD, PM, +33 5 61 77 85 73 ext. +33, bernard.s@chu-toulouse.fr
Aurore PERROT, MD
About this study
Official title: Therapeutic and Support Oncologic Medical Care Evaluation in Patients With Multiple Myeloma in West-Occitanie Region. Factors Influencing Medical Care and Predictive and Prognostic Impact.
Actually very few real life data are available for patients with multiple myeloma (MM), whereas they're playing a more and more important role in health care decisions. Treatments choice for medical care of patient with MM depends of their age, their general status, their eligibility to high dose treatment (autograft), and also based on cytogenetic risk (standard/high risk). Therapeutic strategies are multiple and based on drugs associations including proteasome inhibitors, immuno-modulators and monoclonal antibodies.
Therapeutic medical care objective is to improve quality and response duration through more effective induction schemas, systematic consolidation for patients who have undergone high dose therapy and/or maintenance treatment, ensuring patients safety and well-being in the health care pathway.
Read more
Quality of life evaluation has to take in consideration disease outcome and secondary effects impact from treatments prescribed for MM.
With clinical trials, new therapeutic strategies are proposed with innovative drugs but participants are selected and do not represent all patients with MM. Therefore, there is a large gap between clinical trials and real life data.
That's why the CHU Toulouse intends to set up a prospective cohort to evaluate the health care pathway of patients with MM in West-Occitanie region and studies impact of treatments prescribed on the disease and on the patients' quality of life.
With this research, standard of care practices for patients with MM will be followed, prognostic scores and clinical trials results will be validated in real life, impact of outpatient support procedure will be assessed (AMA procedure) and sociodemographic/quality of life data will be available for research teams.
Read the detailed description
Primary objective :
Describe health care pathways of patients with MM living in West Occitanie according to socio-demographic patients' caracteristics, their comorbidities and their initial disease severity. These pathways will be described until the patients' death if the death occurs before the end of their follow-up in this study.
Secondary objectives :
- The best response at each line of therapy
- The progression free survival and overall survival
- Quality of life of patients with MM along their health care pathway
- Second primary malignancy and neuropathy grade 3 or more occurrence during patients'care
- Socio-demographic, clinic and biology factors identification to predict response to treatments, progression free survival, overall survival and quality of life.
Study size calculation :
With the hypothesis of 80% of patients informed about the study will agree to participate and will accept to have their health care data collected, and with 500 to 550 patients' medical files presented each year for MM care to West Occitanie multidisciplinary committee meeting (approximately 400 different patients), a 5-years recruitment period will lead to 1600 patients enrollment.
This size will be able to generate enough precisions for descriptive analyses. Indeed, as example, with a percentage of 50%, conservative situation to estimate percentages, expected precision should be more or less 2.5% according to Clopper-Pearson exact method.
Precision of more or less 5% should be also obtained for sub-groups of 400 persons.
- Conditions
- Multiple Myeloma
- Being tested
- quality of life questionnaires (EORTC QLQ-C30 ; EORTC QLQMY20 ; EQ-5D-5L ; Cohen's stress scale)
- Keywords
- Multiple Myeloma, Real life, Health care pathways, Quality of life
- Medical subject headings
- Multiple Myeloma
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
quality of life questionnaires (EORTC QLQ-C30 ; EORTC QLQMY20 ; EQ-5D-5L ; Cohen's stress scale)Other
Excepted the delivery of quality of life questionnaires (a maximum of 5 times during the course of treatment) specific to this study, only the data available during the course of patient care will be collected.
The quality of life questionnaires and the perceived stress questionnaire will be given to patients :
- At diagnosis (before starting 1st line of treatment),
- after the induction phase (before autologous transplantation for patients who will be transplanted),
- after the consolidation phase,
- after the maintenance phase : 1 year and 2 years after the start of the maintenance.
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Treatment lines and procedures followed by the patients
Different treatment lines and procedures followed by the patients with drugs involved, number of cycles performed in each treatment phase (induction, consolidation, maintenance) and for each therapeutic line
Measured: 5 to 10 years
Transplants
Transplants carrying out
Measured: 5 to 10 years
Treatments discontinuation
Reasons for treatments administered discontinuation
Measured: 5 to 10 years
Therapeutic medical care description
Supportive care and the type of care set up
Measured: 5 to 10 years
Unconventional alternative medicine
Use and description of unconventional alternative medicine
Measured: 5 to 10 years
Outpatient support structure
Support from an outpatient support structure (AMA)
Measured: 5 to 10 years
Secondary outcomes (6)
Best response (BR)
BR evaluated according to IMWG criteria at each treatment line. This takes into account the MRD as part of the response criteria since this date.
Measured: 5 to 10 years
Progression-free Survival (PFS)
Time between date of first intake of treatment until 1st progression according to the IMWG criteria or until death if it occurs before progression
Measured: 5 to 10 years
PFS after the second therapeutic line
Time between date of 1st dose of treatment until 2nd progression according to the IMWG criteria or until death if it occurs before the 2nd progression.
Measured: 5 to 10 years
Overall Survival (OS);
Time between date of first intake of treatment and death from any cause.
Measured: 5 to 10 years
Quality of life (QOL) during the treatment course
QOL assessed by the EORTC questionnaires QLQ-C30, QLQMY20 and EQ-5D-5L, at the start of treatment then at the end of induction and consolidation periods and once a year for patients undergoing maintenance for the first 2 lines of treatment.
Measured: 5 to 10 years
Second primary cancers (SPC) and grade 3 and higher neuropathies
-SPC and grade 3 and higher neuropathies (depending on the applicable version of the CTCAE)
Measured: 5 to 10 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted17 May 2021
- Study start15 Dec 2021
- Primary completionJun 2031 (estimated)
- Study completionJun 2031 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Multiple MyelomaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University Hospital, ToulouseThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
- Enrolment
- 2,000 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospital, Toulouse
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Aurore PERROT, MD, Principal investigator, IUCT-Oncopole - Toulouse University Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04888039
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- RC31/20/0482
- Other IDs
- N° ID RCB: 2020-A03527-32
- Acronym
- VAMOS
- Status last verified
- Apr 2026
- First submitted
- 4 May 2021
- Last updated
- 29 Apr 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 29 Apr 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Therapeutic and Support Oncologic Medical Care Evaluation in Patients With Multiple Myeloma in West-Occitanie Region. Factors Influencing Medical Care and Predictive and Prognostic Impact.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04888039
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- VAMOS / RC31/20/0482
- Conditions
- Multiple Myeloma
- Keywords
- Multiple Myeloma, Real life, Health care pathways, Quality of life
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 2,000 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospital, ToulouseUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Institut National de la Santé Et de la Recherche Médicale, France, Takeda, Sanofi
- Study start
- 15 Dec 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Jun 2031 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Jun 2031 (estimated)
- First posted
- 17 May 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Actually very few real life data are available for patients with multiple myeloma (MM), whereas they're playing a more and more important role in health care decisions. Treatments choice for medical care of patient with MM depends of their age, their general status, their eligibility to high dose treatment (autograft), and also based on cytogenetic risk (standard/high risk). Therapeutic strategies are multiple and based on drugs associations including proteasome inhibitors, immuno-modulators and monoclonal antibodies.
Therapeutic medical care objective is to improve quality and response duration through more effective induction schemas, systematic consolidation for patients who have undergone high dose therapy and/or maintenance treatment, ensuring patients safety and well-being in the health care pathway.
Quality of life evaluation has to take in consideration disease outcome and secondary effects impact from treatments prescribed for MM.
With clinical trials, new therapeutic strategies are proposed with innovative drugs but participants are selected and do not represent all patients with MM. Therefore, there is a large gap between clinical trials and real life data.
That's why the CHU Toulouse intends to set up a prospective cohort to evaluate the health care pathway of patients with MM in West-Occitanie region and studies impact of treatments prescribed on the disease and on the patients' quality of life.
With this research, standard of care practices for patients with MM will be followed, prognostic scores and clinical trials results will be validated in real life, impact of outpatient support procedure will be assessed (AMA procedure) and sociodemographic/quality of life data will be available for research teams.
Detailed description
Primary objective :
Describe health care pathways of patients with MM living in West Occitanie according to socio-demographic patients' caracteristics, their comorbidities and their initial disease severity. These pathways will be described until the patients' death if the death occurs before the end of their follow-up in this study.
Secondary objectives :
- The best response at each line of therapy
- The progression free survival and overall survival
- Quality of life of patients with MM along their health care pathway
- Second primary malignancy and neuropathy grade 3 or more occurrence during patients'care
- Socio-demographic, clinic and biology factors identification to predict response to treatments, progression free survival, overall survival and quality of life.
Study size calculation :
With the hypothesis of 80% of patients informed about the study will agree to participate and will accept to have their health care data collected, and with 500 to 550 patients' medical files presented each year for MM care to West Occitanie multidisciplinary committee meeting (approximately 400 different patients), a 5-years recruitment period will lead to 1600 patients enrollment.
This size will be able to generate enough precisions for descriptive analyses. Indeed, as example, with a percentage of 50%, conservative situation to estimate percentages, expected precision should be more or less 2.5% according to Clopper-Pearson exact method.
Precision of more or less 5% should be also obtained for sub-groups of 400 persons.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Adult patients with a diagnosis of symptomatic multiple myeloma and living in the west-Occitanie region.
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Patient living in the West-Occitanie region
- Patient with a diagnosis of symptomatic multiple myeloma (Rajkumar et al, Lancet Oncology 2014)
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Patient opposed to this research
- Patient under legal protection
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| quality of life questionnaires (EORTC QLQ-C30 ; EORTC QLQMY20 ; EQ-5D-5L ; Cohen's stress scale)Excepted the delivery of quality of life questionnaires (a maximum of 5 times during the course of treatment) specific to this study, only the data available during the course of patient care will be collected. The quality of life questionnaires and the perceived stress questionnaire will be given to patients : * At diagnosis (before starting 1st line of treatment), * after the induction phase (before autologous transplantation for patients who will be transplanted), * after the consolidation phase, * after the maintenance phase : 1 year and 2 years after the start of the maintenance. | Other | – |
Primary outcome
Treatment lines and procedures followed by the patients
Time frame: 5 to 10 years
Different treatment lines and procedures followed by the patients with drugs involved, number of cycles performed in each treatment phase (induction, consolidation, maintenance) and for each therapeutic line
Transplants
Time frame: 5 to 10 years
Transplants carrying out
Treatments discontinuation
Time frame: 5 to 10 years
Reasons for treatments administered discontinuation
Therapeutic medical care description
Time frame: 5 to 10 years
Supportive care and the type of care set up
Unconventional alternative medicine
Time frame: 5 to 10 years
Use and description of unconventional alternative medicine
Outpatient support structure
Time frame: 5 to 10 years
Support from an outpatient support structure (AMA)
6 secondary outcomes
Best response (BR)
Time frame: 5 to 10 years
Progression-free Survival (PFS)
Time frame: 5 to 10 years
PFS after the second therapeutic line
Time frame: 5 to 10 years
Overall Survival (OS);
Time frame: 5 to 10 years
Quality of life (QOL) during the treatment course
Time frame: 5 to 10 years
Second primary cancers (SPC) and grade 3 and higher neuropathies
Time frame: 5 to 10 years
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 29 Apr 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Multiple Myeloma
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Study of YKST02 in Adults With Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma
Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM)
RecruitingPhase 2
Engaging T-cells to Eliminate MRD in Newly Diagnosed Myeloma Optimizing Response With Talquetmab and Teclistamab (ROTATE)
Multiple Myeloma
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
A Phase III Study of Eque-cel in Subjects With Len-refractory RRMM (FUMANBA-03)
Multiple Myeloma
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
A Window of Opportunity Trial to Learn if Linvoseltamab is Safe and Well Tolerated, and How Well it Works in Adult Participants With Recently Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Who Have Not Already Received Treatment
Multiple Myeloma
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Testing AZD5363 as a Potential Targeted Treatment in Cancers With AKT Genetic Changes (MATCH-Subprotocol Y)
Advanced Lymphoma, Advanced Malignant Solid Neoplasm
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Aurore PERROT, MD principal investigator
IUCT-Oncopole - Toulouse University Hospital
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Multiple Myeloma, run by University Hospital, Toulouse at 1 site in France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Apr 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Aurore PERROT, MD (+33 5 31 15 64 90 ext. +33, perrot.aurore@iuct-oncopole.fr), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Treatment lines and procedures followed by the patients (time frame: 5 to 10 years). The study lists 6 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Apr 2026.